Copyright
©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2005; 11(20): 3147-3150
Published online May 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i20.3147
Published online May 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i20.3147
Figure 1 Effect of emodin on the contents of motilin and somatostatin in small intestine of mice (mean±SD, n = 10).
A. Normal control; B. Model; C. Emodin low dose; D. Emodin medium dose; E. Emodin high dose. aP<0.05 vs model; bP<0.01 vs model; dP<0.01 vs normal control.
Figure 2 Effect of emodin on transmural PD (glucose K-H) of mice in vitro: comparison of the same group before administration and 15 min after administration.
mean±SD, n = 10 1.K-H solution; 2.emodin (0.2 g/L); 3. emodin (0.4 g/L); 4. emodin (0.8 g/L); 5. emodin (1.6 g/L); bP<0.01 vs before administration.
Figure 3 Effect of emodin on transmural PD (glucose K-H) of mice in vitro: comparison of different group before administration and 15 min after administration.
mean±SD, n = 100. K-H solution; bP<0.01 vs K-H solution.
- Citation: Zhang HQ, Zhou CH, Wu YQ. Effect of emodin on small intestinal peristalsis of mice and relevant mechanism. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(20): 3147-3150
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i20/3147.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i20.3147