Correlation of tumor-positive ratio and number of perigastric lymph nodes with prognosis of gastric carcinoma in surgically-treated patients

doi:10.3748/wjg.v10.i2.182

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 10, Issue 2

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (2893)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series, Tables (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

341

HTML

2117

Figures (1-2)

212

Tables (1-4)

223

Sum=2893

Jan 15, 2004 (publication date) through Nov 27, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (11)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Gastric Cancer

World J Gastroenterol. Jan 15, 2004; 10(2): 182-185
Published online Jan 15, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i2.182

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Negative correlation between survival years and ra-tio of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with gastric cancer. +: patients with metastatic ratio of lymph node less than 20%: -: patients with metastatic ratio of lymph node more than 21%.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Negative correlations between survival years and num-ber of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with gastric cancer. +: patients with metastatic number of lymph nodes less than 5: -: patients with metastatic number of lymph nodes more than 6.

Citation: Ding YB, Chen GY, Xia JG, Zang XW, Yang HY, Yang L, Liu YX. Correlation of tumor-positive ratio and number of perigastric lymph nodes with prognosis of gastric carcinoma in surgically-treated patients. World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10(2): 182-185
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v10/i2/182.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v10.i2.182