Martínez-Díaz FM, Jiménez-Cuevas EA, Morales-Galicia AE, Ramírez-Mejía MM, Qi XS, Poo JL, Méndez-Sánchez N. Toward noninvasive prediction of treatment outcomes in patients with variceal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(11): 115723 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i11.115723]
Reader's ID:
08942927
Submitted on:
March 16, 2026, 07:30
Reader Expertise:
Reader’s expertise on the topic of the manuscript
Conflicts-of-Interest Statement:
Does the reader have a conflict of interest?
Reader Comment Standards for Published Articles:
1 Title
Does the title reflect the main subject/hypothesis of the manuscript?
2 Abstract
Does the abstract summarize and reflect the work described in the manuscript?
3 Key Words
Do the key words reflect the focus of the manuscript?
4 Background
Does the manuscript adequately describe the background, present status and significance of the study?
5 Methods
Does the manuscript describe methods (e.g., experiments, data analysis, surveys, and clinical trials, etc.) in adequate detail?
6 Results
Are the research objectives achieved by the experiments used in this study?
Has the study made meaningful contributions towards research progress in this field?
7 Discussion
Does the manuscript interpret the findings adequately and appropriately, highlighting the key points concisely, clearly and logically?
Are the findings and their applicability/relevance to the literature stated in a clear and definite manner?
Is the Discussion accurate and does it discuss the paper’s scientific significance and/or relevance to clinical practice sufficiently?
8 Illustrations and Tables
Are the figures, diagrams and tables sufficient, good quality and appropriately illustrative of the paper contents?
Do figures require labeling with arrows, asterisks, etc., or better legends?
9 Biostatistics
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of biostatistics?
10 Units
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of use of SI units?
11 References
Does the manuscript appropriately cite the latest, important and authoritative references in the Introduction and Discussion sections?
Does the author self-cite, omit, incorrectly cite and/or over-cite references?
12 Quality of manuscript organization and presentation
Is the manuscript concisely and coherently organized and presented?
Are the style, language and grammar accurate and appropriate?
13 Ethics statements
For all manuscripts involving human studies and/or animal experiments, author(s) must submit the related formal ethics documents that were reviewed and approved by their local ethical review committee. Did the manuscript meet the requirements of ethics?
Scientific Quality:
The overall quality of the manuscript, based on the above-listed criteria, should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories
Language Quality:
Language quality (style, grammar, and spelling) should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories.
Reader Comments:
Esophageal variceal bleeding is one of the most severe complications of cirrhotic portal hypertension, associated with high rates of rebleeding and mortality. Although endoscopic variceal band ligation (EVBL) is currently the standard treatment, its reliance on repeated endoscopic follow-up presents challenges, including invasiveness, high resource consumption, and poor patient tolerance.
This study focuses on the potential application of multiparametric ultrasound (MP-US) in predicting outcomes following EVBL, proposing a novel follow-up strategy that is noninvasive, individualized, and reproducible, with significant promise for clinical translation.
The article begins with the clinical burden of EVB, progressively introduces the limitations of current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, and naturally transitions to the technical advantages and research evidence supporting MP-US, culminating in future research directions. The structure is well-organized, and the logic is rigorous. The critical analysis of existing technologies is insightful. The article objectively highlights the limitations of HVPG and repeated endoscopy, particularly their inaccessibility in resource-limited settings. It also provides a reasonable evaluation of the shortcomings of noninvasive tools such as the Baveno criteria and elastography in predicting postprocedural outcomes, reflecting the authors' deep understanding of clinical realities. The analysis of MP-US's clinical application is thorough. By integrating measurements of liver stiffness, spleen stiffness, and perfusion imaging, MP-US enables a comprehensive assessment of portal hypertension from both structural and hemodynamic perspectives, overcoming the limitations of traditional single-parameter prediction models. Citing data from Ainora et al, the study demonstrates the potential of MP-US in predicting variceal eradication and guiding individualized follow-up. The outlook on future research directions is instructive. The article notes that current studies are mostly small-sample, single-center designs lacking standardized operating and interpretation protocols, and calls for multicenter, prospective studies to validate the clinical value of MP-US—a recommendation with practical significance. Figure 1 is highly informative, clearly illustrating the evolutionary pathway from invasive to noninvasive diagnostic tools, facilitating readers' understanding of technological advancements.
Areas for improvement and suggestions: The issue of MP-US technical standardization requires further clarification. Although the article mentions that MP-US is influenced by factors such as operator experience and equipment variability, it does not delve deeply into how to achieve standardized operation and interpretation; future research should focus on this aspect. A cost-effectiveness analysis is lacking. While MP-US has the potential to reduce the frequency of endoscopic examinations, its high equipment costs and reliance on contrast agents may limit its widespread adoption in certain regions. Future studies should incorporate health economic evaluations. The integration of AI with MP-US warrants further exploration. The article mentions the application of AI in endoscopic measurement but does not explore the possibility of combining AI with MP-US. Future research could investigate AI-based automated analysis of MP-US images and risk prediction models.
This study, with its clear logic, solid literature support, and forward-looking perspective, systematically elaborates on the potential application of MP-US in post-EVBL follow-up. It not only provides clinicians with new diagnostic and therapeutic insights but also points future researchers toward promising directions. If further advancements are made in MP-US standardization, multicenter validation, and AI integration, it holds the potential to achieve truly noninvasive, precise, and individualized management of portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis.