Guan AX, Yang SY, Wu T, Zhou WT, Chen H, Huang ZS, Luo PP, Huang YQ. Novel chromogenic medium-based method for the rapid detection of Helicobacter pylori drug resistance. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(32): 106424 [PMID: 40900768 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i32.106424]
Reader's ID:
08065750
Submitted on:
August 27, 2025, 09:47
Reader Expertise:
Reader’s expertise on the topic of the manuscript
Conflicts-of-Interest Statement:
Does the reader have a conflict of interest?
Reader Comment Standards for Published Articles:
1 Title
Does the title reflect the main subject/hypothesis of the manuscript?
2 Abstract
Does the abstract summarize and reflect the work described in the manuscript?
3 Key Words
Do the key words reflect the focus of the manuscript?
4 Background
Does the manuscript adequately describe the background, present status and significance of the study?
5 Methods
Does the manuscript describe methods (e.g., experiments, data analysis, surveys, and clinical trials, etc.) in adequate detail?
6 Results
Are the research objectives achieved by the experiments used in this study?
Has the study made meaningful contributions towards research progress in this field?
7 Discussion
Does the manuscript interpret the findings adequately and appropriately, highlighting the key points concisely, clearly and logically?
Are the findings and their applicability/relevance to the literature stated in a clear and definite manner?
Is the Discussion accurate and does it discuss the paper’s scientific significance and/or relevance to clinical practice sufficiently?
8 Illustrations and Tables
Are the figures, diagrams and tables sufficient, good quality and appropriately illustrative of the paper contents?
Do figures require labeling with arrows, asterisks, etc., or better legends?
9 Biostatistics
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of biostatistics?
10 Units
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of use of SI units?
11 References
Does the manuscript appropriately cite the latest, important and authoritative references in the Introduction and Discussion sections?
Does the author self-cite, omit, incorrectly cite and/or over-cite references?
12 Quality of manuscript organization and presentation
Is the manuscript concisely and coherently organized and presented?
Are the style, language and grammar accurate and appropriate?
13 Ethics statements
For all manuscripts involving human studies and/or animal experiments, author(s) must submit the related formal ethics documents that were reviewed and approved by their local ethical review committee. Did the manuscript meet the requirements of ethics?
Scientific Quality:
The overall quality of the manuscript, based on the above-listed criteria, should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories
Language Quality:
Language quality (style, grammar, and spelling) should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories.
Reader Comments:
This study addresses an important and timely issue in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection, particularly given the rising problem of drug resistance. The authors have clearly explained the challenges with conventional susceptibility testing, which is slow and laborious due to the bacterium’s fastidious growth. The new chromogenic medium-based method they propose is interesting and practical, as it uses urease activity to visually identify resistant strains while suppressing susceptible ones with antibiotics. The methodology is described in a clear and detailed manner, and the inclusion of standard reference strains as controls adds credibility. The results are impressive, showing that resistance can be detected in just 28-36 hours—far quicker than the usual 11-day protocol—without compromising accuracy. The high detection rate (90.5%) and strong agreement with standard microdilution testing make a strong case for the method’s reliability. The study rightly points out the simplicity and potential clinical usefulness of this approach, which could help doctors make faster treatment decisions and improve patient outcomes. Some minor points that could be addressed include how well the method performs in samples with mixed infections or varying urease activity, and a discussion on its cost-effectiveness and feasibility for routine use in clinical labs. Overall, this is a well-conducted and valuable study with strong translational potential.
Reply from the Editorial Office:
First, thank you very much for your professional comments on the article published in World Journal of Gastroenterology.
Second, we read your comments with great interest. You are welcome to format your valuable comments into a Letter to the Editor and submit it online to World Journal of Gastroenterology at https://www.f6publishing.com. There are no restrictions on the number of words, figures (color, B/W) or authors for a Letter to the Editor. In addition, the article processing charge will be exempted for this Letter to the Editor. As with all articles published by the Baishideng Publishing Group, the Letter to the Editor will be published online after completing peer review. The guidelines for a Letter to the Editor can be found at: https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/GerInfo/219.
Finally, we look forward to receiving your high-quality Letter to the Editor, which will promote academic communication and lead the development of this discipline.
Author's Reply:
Replied on September 29, 2025, 04:21
This is a relatively good paper, with innovative content and potential value for application.
Replied on September 29, 2025, 04:21
This is a relatively good paper, with innovative content and potential value for application.