BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Manuscript Reader Comments
Atay A, Ergul M, Ozturk O, Acun KC, Cagir Y, Durak MB, Yuksel I. Outcomes of 5-aminosalicylates withdrawal due to non-adherence in ulcerative colitis patients: A step toward evaluating intermittent therapy. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(30): 110112 [PMID: 40904881 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i30.110112]
Reader's ID:
08549003
Submitted on:
August 09, 2025, 02:20
Reader Expertise:
Reader’s expertise on the topic of the manuscript
Conflicts-of-Interest Statement:
Does the reader have a conflict of interest?
Reader Comment Standards for Published Articles:
1 Title
Does the title reflect the main subject/hypothesis of the manuscript?
2 Abstract
Does the abstract summarize and reflect the work described in the manuscript?
3 Key Words
Do the key words reflect the focus of the manuscript?
4 Background
Does the manuscript adequately describe the background, present status and significance of the study?
5 Methods
Does the manuscript describe methods (e.g., experiments, data analysis, surveys, and clinical trials, etc.) in adequate detail?
6 Results
Are the research objectives achieved by the experiments used in this study?
Has the study made meaningful contributions towards research progress in this field?
7 Discussion
Does the manuscript interpret the findings adequately and appropriately, highlighting the key points concisely, clearly and logically?
Are the findings and their applicability/relevance to the literature stated in a clear and definite manner?
Is the Discussion accurate and does it discuss the paper’s scientific significance and/or relevance to clinical practice sufficiently?
8 Illustrations and Tables
Are the figures, diagrams and tables sufficient, good quality and appropriately illustrative of the paper contents?
Do figures require labeling with arrows, asterisks, etc., or better legends?
9 Biostatistics
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of biostatistics?
10 Units
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of use of SI units?
11 References
Does the manuscript appropriately cite the latest, important and authoritative references in the Introduction and Discussion sections?
Does the author self-cite, omit, incorrectly cite and/or over-cite references?
12 Quality of manuscript organization and presentation
Is the manuscript concisely and coherently organized and presented?
Are the style, language and grammar accurate and appropriate?
13 Ethics statements
For all manuscripts involving human studies and/or animal experiments, author(s) must submit the related formal ethics documents that were reviewed and approved by their local ethical review committee. Did the manuscript meet the requirements of ethics?
Scientific Quality:
The overall quality of the manuscript, based on the above-listed criteria, should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories
Language Quality:
Language quality (style, grammar, and spelling) should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories.
Reader Comments:
Inflammatory bowel disease is a chronic, debilitating, lifelong disease with waxing and waning. Since the disease is chronic, long-term medical therapy is required. Often, a few patients may not be adherent to medications due to various reasons, and this study explored this aspect with the expansion of Withdrawal of drugs in IBD. Most of the patients who were not adherent may present with acute severe ulcerative colitis, and most of them will have recapture of the remission with steroids or original drugs. This Study also showed a similar picture, with only 1/4 requiring corticosteroids. This study is well-written, but in the era of treat-to-target, it notably overlooks the histological findings in patients with ASA withdrawal. Addition of Endoscopic and histopathological findings after withdrawal, even without relapse, would have given a better picture
Reply from the Editorial Office:
Thank you very much for your comments.
Author's Reply:
Replied on August 09, 2025, 21:58
We thank the reader for their insightful comments. We agree that endoscopic and histopathological assessments following 5-ASA withdrawal could provide valuable additional insights. However, the design of our study was focused on evaluating clinical outcomes and treatment patterns rather than histological or endoscopic parameters. Our aim was to present a clear, real-world picture of the clinical course after 5-ASA withdrawal in ulcerative colitis patients in remission. We appreciate this perspective, and future studies incorporating histological and endoscopic follow-up may further enhance understanding of this clinical scenario.