BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Manuscript Reader Comments
Huang YH, Lin Q, Jin XY, Chou CY, Wei JJ, Xing J, Guo HM, Liu ZF, Lu Y. Classification of pediatric video capsule endoscopy images for small bowel abnormalities using deep learning models. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(21): 107601 [PMID: 40538507 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i21.107601]
Reader's ID:
08628847
Submitted on:
June 20, 2025, 08:23
Reader Expertise:
Reader’s expertise on the topic of the manuscript
Conflicts-of-Interest Statement:
Does the reader have a conflict of interest?
Reader Comment Standards for Published Articles:
1 Title
Does the title reflect the main subject/hypothesis of the manuscript?
2 Abstract
Does the abstract summarize and reflect the work described in the manuscript?
3 Key Words
Do the key words reflect the focus of the manuscript?
4 Background
Does the manuscript adequately describe the background, present status and significance of the study?
5 Methods
Does the manuscript describe methods (e.g., experiments, data analysis, surveys, and clinical trials, etc.) in adequate detail?
6 Results
Are the research objectives achieved by the experiments used in this study?
Has the study made meaningful contributions towards research progress in this field?
7 Discussion
Does the manuscript interpret the findings adequately and appropriately, highlighting the key points concisely, clearly and logically?
Are the findings and their applicability/relevance to the literature stated in a clear and definite manner?
Is the Discussion accurate and does it discuss the paper’s scientific significance and/or relevance to clinical practice sufficiently?
8 Illustrations and Tables
Are the figures, diagrams and tables sufficient, good quality and appropriately illustrative of the paper contents?
Do figures require labeling with arrows, asterisks, etc., or better legends?
9 Biostatistics
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of biostatistics?
10 Units
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of use of SI units?
11 References
Does the manuscript appropriately cite the latest, important and authoritative references in the Introduction and Discussion sections?
Does the author self-cite, omit, incorrectly cite and/or over-cite references?
12 Quality of manuscript organization and presentation
Is the manuscript concisely and coherently organized and presented?
Are the style, language and grammar accurate and appropriate?
13 Ethics statements
For all manuscripts involving human studies and/or animal experiments, author(s) must submit the related formal ethics documents that were reviewed and approved by their local ethical review committee. Did the manuscript meet the requirements of ethics?
Scientific Quality:
The overall quality of the manuscript, based on the above-listed criteria, should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories
Language Quality:
Language quality (style, grammar, and spelling) should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories.
Reader Comments:
This paper explores the application of deep learning models, including DenseNet121, ResNet50, VGG16, and Vision Transformer, for classifying pediatric video capsule endoscopy (VCE) images, aiming to improve diagnostic efficiency for pediatric gastrointestinal diseases. The study is highly relevant to clinical needs, particularly in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and reducing manual review time. The results show that the deep learning models used performed excellently in classifying various lesions, such as normal mucosa, ulcers, and polyps. However, the novelty of the study is somewhat limited, as it mainly applies existing deep learning architectures without providing new methods. The discussion on clinical applications is also brief, lacking in-depth analysis of the model's applicability, limitations, and challenges in real-world clinical settings. Overall, the paper offers valuable insights into the automated diagnosis of pediatric gastrointestinal diseases, but it would benefit from more original data and a deeper exploration of clinical applications.
Reply from the Editorial Office:
Thank you very much for your comments.