Xu EP, Qi ZP, Zhang JW, Li B, Ren Z, Cai MY, Cai SL, Lv ZT, Chen ZH, Liu JY, Zhong YS, Zhou PH, Shi Q. Endoscopic treatment outcome of oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumours. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(10): 102393 [PMID: 40093666 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i10.102393]
Reader's ID:
03731036
Submitted on:
March 10, 2025, 06:41
Reader Expertise:
Reader’s expertise on the topic of the manuscript
Conflicts-of-Interest Statement:
Does the reader have a conflict of interest?
Reader Comment Standards for Published Articles:
1 Title
Does the title reflect the main subject/hypothesis of the manuscript?
2 Abstract
Does the abstract summarize and reflect the work described in the manuscript?
3 Key Words
Do the key words reflect the focus of the manuscript?
4 Background
Does the manuscript adequately describe the background, present status and significance of the study?
5 Methods
Does the manuscript describe methods (e.g., experiments, data analysis, surveys, and clinical trials, etc.) in adequate detail?
6 Results
Are the research objectives achieved by the experiments used in this study?
Has the study made meaningful contributions towards research progress in this field?
7 Discussion
Does the manuscript interpret the findings adequately and appropriately, highlighting the key points concisely, clearly and logically?
Are the findings and their applicability/relevance to the literature stated in a clear and definite manner?
Is the Discussion accurate and does it discuss the paper’s scientific significance and/or relevance to clinical practice sufficiently?
8 Illustrations and Tables
Are the figures, diagrams and tables sufficient, good quality and appropriately illustrative of the paper contents?
Do figures require labeling with arrows, asterisks, etc., or better legends?
9 Biostatistics
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of biostatistics?
10 Units
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of use of SI units?
11 References
Does the manuscript appropriately cite the latest, important and authoritative references in the Introduction and Discussion sections?
Does the author self-cite, omit, incorrectly cite and/or over-cite references?
12 Quality of manuscript organization and presentation
Is the manuscript concisely and coherently organized and presented?
Are the style, language and grammar accurate and appropriate?
13 Ethics statements
For all manuscripts involving human studies and/or animal experiments, author(s) must submit the related formal ethics documents that were reviewed and approved by their local ethical review committee. Did the manuscript meet the requirements of ethics?
Scientific Quality:
The overall quality of the manuscript, based on the above-listed criteria, should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories
Language Quality:
Language quality (style, grammar, and spelling) should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories.
Reader Comments:
This study provides valuable data specifically focused on endoscopic resection (ER) of esophageal GISTs. Thorough evaluation of the ER technique, complications, and resection margin status enhances our understanding of ER safety and effectiveness. Furthermore, the study presented a relatively large case series of 32 patients, which increases the statistical reliability of the findings for esophageal GIST research. By presenting long-term follow-up results, it assessed the long-term prognosis after ER and suggested potential benefits for future treatment strategy development.
Reply from the Editorial Office:
Thank you very much for your comments.