Tamraz M, Al Ghossaini N, Temraz S. Optimization of colorectal cancer screening strategies: New insights. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30(28): 3361-3366 [PMID: 39091719 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i28.3361]
Reader's ID:
03003679
Submitted on:
July 25, 2024, 01:11
Reader Expertise:
Reader’s expertise on the topic of the manuscript
Conflicts-of-Interest Statement:
Does the reader have a conflict of interest?
Reader Comment Standards for Published Articles:
1 Title
Does the title reflect the main subject/hypothesis of the manuscript?
2 Abstract
Does the abstract summarize and reflect the work described in the manuscript?
3 Key Words
Do the key words reflect the focus of the manuscript?
4 Background
Does the manuscript adequately describe the background, present status and significance of the study?
5 Methods
Does the manuscript describe methods (e.g., experiments, data analysis, surveys, and clinical trials, etc.) in adequate detail?
6 Results
Are the research objectives achieved by the experiments used in this study?
Has the study made meaningful contributions towards research progress in this field?
7 Discussion
Does the manuscript interpret the findings adequately and appropriately, highlighting the key points concisely, clearly and logically?
Are the findings and their applicability/relevance to the literature stated in a clear and definite manner?
Is the Discussion accurate and does it discuss the paper’s scientific significance and/or relevance to clinical practice sufficiently?
8 Illustrations and Tables
Are the figures, diagrams and tables sufficient, good quality and appropriately illustrative of the paper contents?
Do figures require labeling with arrows, asterisks, etc., or better legends?
9 Biostatistics
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of biostatistics?
10 Units
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of use of SI units?
11 References
Does the manuscript appropriately cite the latest, important and authoritative references in the Introduction and Discussion sections?
Does the author self-cite, omit, incorrectly cite and/or over-cite references?
12 Quality of manuscript organization and presentation
Is the manuscript concisely and coherently organized and presented?
Are the style, language and grammar accurate and appropriate?
13 Ethics statements
For all manuscripts involving human studies and/or animal experiments, author(s) must submit the related formal ethics documents that were reviewed and approved by their local ethical review committee. Did the manuscript meet the requirements of ethics?
Scientific Quality:
The overall quality of the manuscript, based on the above-listed criteria, should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories
Language Quality:
Language quality (style, grammar, and spelling) should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories.
Reader Comments:
Enhancing Participation Rates: The Necessity of Optimizing Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies
Introduction
Magie Tamraz et al.'s article in the World Journal of Gastroenterology delves into the critical issue of optimizing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening strategies. Despite the proven mortality benefits of screening, adherence to CRC screening guidelines remains low in many regions worldwide. This comment highlights the key points of the article and its significant contributions to CRC screening strategies.
Identifying High-Risk Groups
The article emphasizes the importance of identifying high-risk groups for screening, given the limited financial and human resources. This perspective is highly pragmatic as nationwide screening is not feasible in many countries. By focusing on screening high-risk individuals, resources can be utilized more effectively to minimize the burden of CRC.
Considering Population Variations
Implementing screening procedures requires consideration of variations within each population. This argument underscores the necessity of avoiding a "one-size-fits-all" approach in developing and implementing screening strategies. Each population has specific barriers and challenges, and addressing these is crucial for improving screening adherence. The authors suggest tackling these barriers in a targeted manner to enhance overall screening effectiveness.
Encouraging Patients with Comorbidities to Undergo Screening
The article points out that patients with comorbidities who regularly visit the hospital are often diagnosed with CRC at an early stage, similar to those undergoing periodic screening. This finding highlights the importance of encouraging patients with comorbidities who do not attend routine visits to undergo screening. This recommendation is significant for reducing the burden of late-stage CRC diagnosis, emphasizing the critical role of regular screening in early cancer detection.
Conclusion
Tamraz et al.'s article provides valuable insights into optimizing CRC screening strategies. Identifying high-risk individuals, considering population variations, and encouraging patients with comorbidities to undergo screening are key steps in improving screening adherence and reducing the burden of CRC. Implementing these optimized strategies can significantly enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of CRC screening, ultimately improving overall patient outcomes.
Reply from the Editorial Office:
First, thank you very much for your professional comments on the article published in World Journal of Gastroenterology.
Second, we read your comments with great interest. You are welcome to format your valuable comments into a Letter to the Editor and submit it online to World Journal of Gastroenterology at https://www.f6publishing.com. There are no restrictions on the number of words, figures (color, B/W) or authors for a Letter to the Editor. In addition, the article processing charge will be exempted for this Letter to the Editor. As with all articles published by the Baishideng Publishing Group, the Letter to the Editor will be published online after completing peer review. The guidelines for a Letter to the Editor can be found at: https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/GerInfo/219.
Finally, we look forward to receiving your high-quality Letter to the Editor, which will promote academic communication and lead the development of this discipline.