Thrombophilia is associated with an elevated risk of thrombosis, which may be further elevated with use of hormonal contraception. Our objective was to update a previously published systematic review on thrombosis risk with use of hormonal contraception among women with thrombophilia.

We conducted a systematic review of five databases from database inception through December 8, 2022. We searched for articles that examined risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) or arterial thromboembolism (ATE) in women with thrombophilia using hormonal contraception compared with women using non-hormonal or no contraception. We assessed risk of bias for each study and certainty of evidence for all outcomes.

Eighteen articles met inclusion criteria; four had moderate risk of bias and 14 had high risk of bias. Odds of VTE in women with factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation or prothrombin (PT) gene mutation were elevated in combined oral contraception (COC) users vs non-users. Odds of VTE were elevated in COC users with FVL mutation, PT gene mutation, both FVL and PT mutations, antithrombin (AT) deficiency, or protein C deficiency compared with non-users without the mutation. Odds of stroke were elevated in COC users with FVL mutation compared with non-users without the mutation. Evidence was mixed on whether risk was elevated in women with protein S deficiency using COC compared with non-use. One study found elevated odds of VTE in women with FVL mutation but not women with PT gene mutation using progestin-only contraception (POC), compared with non-users without the mutation.

Overall, studies found elevated odds of VTE and ATE in women with thrombophilia using COC compared with non-users without thrombophilia. The certainty of evidence for all outcomes is low. Evidence is also limited by small numbers of women and minimal evidence on use of patch, ring, or POC, and is insufficient to assess differential risk by all thrombophilia types.

Use of estrogen-containing hormonal contraception might further elevate risk of thrombosis among women with thrombophilia. Further study is needed on safety of POC use in women with thrombophilia.

Although considered "benign," mild blood count abnormalities, genetic factors imparting inconsequential thrombotic risk, and low-risk premalignant blood disorders can have significant psychological and financial impact on our patients. Several studies have demonstrated that patients with noncancerous conditions have increased levels of anxiety with distress similar to those with malignancy. Additionally, referral to a classical hematologist can be a daunting process for many patients due to uncertainties surrounding the reason for referral or misconstrued beliefs in a cancer diagnosis ascribed to the pairing of oncology and hematology in medical practice. If not properly triaged, incidental laboratory abnormalities can trigger extensive and costly evaluation. These challenges are compounded by a lack of consensus guidance and generalizability of modern reference ranges that do not adequately account for common influencing factors. Although often benign, incidental hematologic findings can lead to emotional suffering and careful consideration of the potential psychological and financial duress imparted to an individual must be considered. In this article, we will review the current literature describing the psychological effect of some commonly known hematologic conditions, identify benign causes for variations in hematologic laboratory values, and provide recommendations to reduce psychological toxicity as it pertains to hematologic testing.

Inherited thrombophilia is a blood clotting disorder caused by genetic mutations of specific coagulation plasma factors. It is a well-established predisposing factor for venous as well as arterial thromboembolism. Thromboembolic events with renal involvement in patients with inherited thrombophilia are possible but relatively rare. On the other hand, vascular complications, including renal artery and vein thrombosis, are the main causes of early graft loss after kidney transplantation. Furthermore, there is evidence that inherited thrombophilia has a role in chronic kidney disease development. Although there are data on kidney transplantation of recipients with inherited thrombophilia, to the best of our knowledge there are no reports on kidney donation from patients with thrombophilia in the English literature. We present 2 cases of successful kidney transplantation from the same donor with inherited thrombophilia.

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are collectively referred to as "venous thromboembolic events" (VTE). Despite advances in prophylaxis, diagnosis, and treatment, VTE remains a leading cause of cost, disability, and death in postoperative and hospitalized patients (1, 2). Beyond the acute sequelae of leg pain, edema, and respiratory distress, VTE may result in chronic conditions, including postthrombotic syndrome (3), venous insufficiency, and pulmonary hypertension. This Practice Bulletin has been revised to reflect updated literature on the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery and the current surgical thromboprophylaxis guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians (4). Discussion of gynecologic surgery and chronic antithrombotic therapy is beyond the scope of this document.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. Up to one half of patients who present with VTE will have an underlying thrombophilic defect. This knowledge has led to a widespread practice of testing for such defects in patients who develop VTE. However, identifying a hereditary thrombophilia by itself does not necessarily change outcomes or dictate therapy. Furthermore, family history of VTE by itself can increase an asymptomatic person's VTE risk several-fold, independent of detecting a known inherited thrombophilia. In this article, we will describe the current validated hereditary thrombophilias including their history, prevalence, and association with VTE. With a focus on evaluating both risks and benefits of testing, we will also explore the controversies of why, who, and when to test as well as discuss contemporary societal guidelines. Lastly, we will share how these tests have been integrated into clinical practice and how to best utilize them in the future.

: Thrombophilia testing is frequently performed in both seemingly provoked and unprovoked portal vein thrombosis (PVT), yet the clinical implications of these expensive laboratory tests are unknown. We investigated the frequency of clinical management changes in patients with newly diagnosed PVT. This is a retrospective analysis of adult patients with a newly diagnosed PVT at a single institution. The primary outcome is change in clinical management, defined as documented change in choice, dose, or duration of anticoagulation, future thromboprophylaxis, or counseling of asymptomatic family members. Five-hundred and forty-four patients with PVT were identified, 438 (80.5%) of whom had an identifiable pretesting provoking factor, most commonly cirrhosis (39.2%). Two-hundred ninety-one patients (53.5%) had at least one hypercoagulable laboratory test performed. The most frequently positive test was PAI-1 polymorphism, followed by elevated homocysteine and MTHFR mutational analysis. However, the only test that was frequently positive and consistently altered management was JAK2 mutational analysis (15.3%). Factor V Leiden was commonly positive but rarely changed clinical decision-making (1.5%), as was flow cytometric testing for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (0.8%), and antiphospholipid antibodies (0.7%). Patients with cirrhosis rarely had thrombophilia testing results that were clinically significant. A rough cost estimate was dramatically reduced from $231 000 to $76 000 if only clinically meaningful tests were employed in the hypercoagulable work-up. These results highlight the need for focused thrombophilia testing in patients with PVT.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is the third most common form of atherosclerotic vascular disease and is characterized by significant functional disability and increased cardiovascular mortality. Recent genetic data support a role for a procoagulation protein variant, the factor V Leiden mutation, in PAD. The role of other hemostatic factors in PAD remains unknown. We evaluated the role of hemostatic factors in PAD using Mendelian randomization. Approach and Results: Two-sample Mendelian randomization to evaluate the roles of FVII (factor VII), FVIII (factor VIII), FXI (factor XI), VWF (von Willebrand factor), and fibrinogen in PAD was performed using summary statistics from GWAS for hemostatic factors performed within the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in the Genome Epidemiology Consortium and from GWAS performed for PAD within the Million Veteran Program. Genetically determined FVIII and VWF, but not FVII, FXI, or fibrinogen, were associated with PAD in Mendelian randomization experiments (FVIII: odds ratio, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.23-1.62], P=6.0×10^-7, VWF: odds ratio, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.07-1.52], P=0.0073). In single variant sensitivity analysis, the ABO locus was the strongest genetic instrument for both FVIII and VWF.

Our results suggest a role for hemostasis, and by extension, thrombosis in PAD. Further study is warranted to determine whether VWF and FVIII independently affect the biology of PAD.

Patients with pulmonary embolism commonly undergo thrombophilia evaluation for a variety of reasons including risk stratification for recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and treatment planning. However, the utility of thrombophilia testing in many clinical scenarios remains unclear. This review evaluates current recommendations for thrombophilia testing described in consensus VTE guidelines, recent literature on the clinical application of these recommendations, novel genetic assessments for hereditary thrombophilias, and studies evaluating use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in VTE patients with thrombophilias.

Current VTE guidelines advise limited use of thrombophilia testing, recognizing that testing may be misinterpreted and frequently does not lead to a change in management. Testing and test results are not necessarily benign, are frequently misinterpreted, and can lead to increased anxiety in both patients and clinicians. Recent studies have offered innovative techniques to better align clinical practice with these recommendations as well as expanded genomic assessments to improve the scope and predictive value of thrombophilia testing. There is also emerging literature on the appropriateness of direct oral anticoagulant therapy for VTE patients with hereditary thrombophilias or antiphospholipid syndrome.

Thrombophilia testing in its current form does not significantly impact clinical management or improve outcomes for most VTE patients. Therefore, it should be employed judiciously and only in patients for whom it is likely to alter clinical management. Novel expanded genomic thrombophilia testing approaches and additional studies evaluating optimal anticoagulant treatment in various thrombophilia subpopulations will make thrombophilia testing more useful for patients moving forward.

Background Inherited thrombophilias are well-established predisposing factors for venous thromboembolism, but their role in arterial thrombosis, such as arterial ischemic stroke, remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the association between inherited thrombophilia (factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A mutation, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, and antithrombin deficiency) and risk of arterial ischemic stroke in adults. Methods and Results We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library Databases from inception to December 31, 2018. We included case-control or cohort studies of adults reporting the prevalence of inherited thrombophilias in those with arterial ischemic stroke and subjects without arterial ischemic stroke. Two reviewers (T.C., E.D.) independently searched the literature and extracted data. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated using random-effects model. We identified 68 eligible studies, which collectively enrolled 11 916 stroke patients and 96 057 controls. The number of studies reporting factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A mutation, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, and antithrombin deficiency were 56, 45, 15, 17, and 12, respectively. Compared with controls, patients with arterial ischemic stroke were significantly more likely to have the following inherited thrombophilias: factor V Leiden (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.08-1.44; I2=0%), prothrombin G20210A mutation (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.22-1.80; I2=0%), protein C deficiency (OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.16-3.90; I2=0%), and protein S deficiency (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.34-3.80; I2=8.8%). Statistical significance was not reached for antithrombin deficiency (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.58-2.67; I2=8.8%). Conclusions Inherited thrombophilias (factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A mutation, protein C deficiency, and protein S deficiency) are associated with an increased risk of arterial ischemic stroke in adults. The implications of these findings with respect to clinical management of patients with ischemic stroke require further investigation.

Significant improvement has been achieved in diagnostic accuracy, validation of probability scores, and standardized treatment algorithms for patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism. These developments have provided the tools for a safe and cost-effective management for most of these patients. In our experience, however, the presence of medical myths and ongoing controversies seem to hinder the implementation of these tools in everyday clinical practice. This review provides a selection of such dilemmas and controversies and discusses the published evidence beyond them. By doing so, we try to overcome these dilemmas and suggest pragmatic approaches guided by the available evidence and current guidelines.

Use of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) by women increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which can have a major impact on an individuals' quality of life. VTE is also associated with an increase in healthcare costs. Our aim was to systematically review cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) considering any screening for risk of VTE in women using COCs. The quality of reporting in each study was assessed, a summary of results was prepared, and the key drivers of cost effectiveness in each of the eligible CEAs were identified. A search strategy using MeSH terms was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, the Centre for Review and Dissemination (CRD) database including the Economic Evaluation Database from the UK National Health Service, and Cochrane reviews. Two reviewers independently screened and determined the final articles, and a third reviewer resolved any discrepancies. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards was used to assess the quality of reporting in terms of perspective, effectiveness measures, model structure, cost, time-horizon and discounting. Four publications (three from Europe, one from the United States) were eligible for inclusion in the review. According to current criteria, relevant elements were sometimes not captured and the sources of epidemiological and effectiveness data used in the CEAs were of limited quality. The studies varied in terms of type of costs assessed, country settings, model assumptions and uncertainty around input parameters. Key drivers of CEAs were sensitivity and specificity of the test, incidence rate of VTE, relative risk of prophylaxis, and costs of the test. The reviewed studies were too dissimilar to draw a firm conclusion on cost-effectiveness analysis about universal and selective screening in high-risk groups. The new emerging diagnostic tools for identifying women at risk of developing VTE, that are more predictive and less costly, highlight the need for more studies that apply the latest evidence and utilize robust methods for cost-effectiveness analysis. This information is required to improve decision making for this pertinent issue within personalized medicine.

Objective To provide evidence to support updated guidelines for the management of pregnant women with hereditary thrombophilia in order to reduce the risk of a first venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pregnancy.Design Systematic review and bayesian meta-analysis.Data sources Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from inception through 14 November 2016.Review methods Observational studies that reported on pregnancies without the use of anticoagulants and the outcome of first VTE for women with thrombophilia were eligible for inclusion. VTE was considered established if it was confirmed by objective means, or when the patient had received a full course of a full dose anticoagulant treatment without objective testing. Results 36 studies were included in the meta-analysis. All thrombophilias increased the risk for pregnancy associated VTE (probabilities ≥91%). Regarding absolute risks of pregnancy associated VTE, high risk thrombophilias were antithrombin deficiency (antepartum: 7.3%, 95% credible interval 1.8% to 15.6%; post partum: 11.1%, 3.7% to 21.0%), protein C deficiency (antepartum: 3.2%, 0.6% to 8.2%; post partum: 5.4%, 0.9% to 13.8%), protein S deficiency (antepartum: 0.9%, 0.0% to 3.7%; post partum: 4.2%; 0.7% to 9.4%), and homozygous factor V Leiden (antepartum: 2.8%, 0.0% to 8.6%; post partum: 2.8%, 0.0% to 8.8%). Absolute combined antepartum and postpartum risks for women with heterozygous factor V Leiden, heterozygous prothrombin G20210A mutations, or compound heterozygous factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations were all below 3%. Conclusions Women with antithrombin, protein C, or protein S deficiency or with homozygous factor V Leiden should be considered for antepartum or postpartum thrombosis prophylaxis, or both. Women with heterozygous factor V Leiden, heterozygous prothrombin G20210A mutation, or compound heterozygous factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutation should generally not be prescribed thrombosis prophylaxis on the basis of thrombophilia and family history alone. These data should be considered in future guidelines on pregnancy associated VTE risk.

Inherited thrombophilia is a blood coagulation disorder that increases the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). During the last decades, the practice of testing has evolved from testing selected populations, leading to high perceived risks, to broad testing for various conditions that included VTE, arterial thrombosis, and pregnancy complications. Because results of such tests usually do not guide treatment decisions, not testing patients with VTE for inherited thrombophilia is on the "Choosing Wisely" list endorsed by multiple specialty societies, including ASH. Inherited thrombophilia can be regarded a double-edged sword, as despite the rationale not to test, it is still being performed frequently. Another way of seeing inherited thrombophilia as a double-edged sword lies in its 2-sided association with reproduction, both in men and in women. Current areas of research are whether women with inherited thrombophilia and pregnancy complications benefit from anticoagulant therapy with regard to improving the chance of a successful pregnancy. Potential effects of inherited thrombophilia, most notably factor V Leiden, on improved embryo implantation in women and sperm counts in men are intriguing, but are currently poorly understood.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the roles of factors associated with coagulation in the etiology and pathogenesis of Sheehan's syndrome (SS) which is a frequent cause of hypopituitarism in underdeveloped and developing regions of the world.

Mean prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and expression levels of genes, which included methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE), coagulation factor V (FV), FVII, FVIII and FIX in 44 patients with SS were compared with 43 healthy subjects.

The mean expression level of the ACE gene was significantly lower, while that of the FV gene was significantly higher in the patients with SS. No significant difference was found between the patients with SS and the healthy subjects in the comparisons of the remaining gene expression values, as well as in the PT and APTT values.

An increased expression of the FV gene may be a contributing factor for the development of SS in some patients. Further studies are required to clarify the roles of coagulation disorders in the development of SS.

While Factor V Leiden (F5 rs6025 A allele) is a known venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk factor, VTE risk among heterozygous vs. homozygous carriers is uncertain.

In a retrospective cohort study of Mayo Clinic patients referred for genotyping between 1996 and 2013, we tested Factor V Leiden genotype as a risk factor for incident and recurrent VTE.

Among heterozygous (n=268) and homozygous (n=111) carriers, the prevalence of VTE was 54% and 68%, respectively (p=0.016). While mean patient age at first VTE event (43.9 vs. 42.9years; p=0.70) did not differ significantly, median VTE-free survival was modestly shorter for homozygous carriers (56.8 vs 59.5 years; p=0.04). Sixty-nine (48%) and 31 (42%) heterozygous and homozygous carriers had ≥1 VTE recurrence (p=0.42). In a multivariable model, idiopathic incident VTE and a second thrombophilia were associated with increased and anticoagulation duration >6months with reduced hazards of VTE recurrence; Factor V Leiden genotype was not an independent predictor of recurrence.

Aside from a higher VTE prevalence and modestly reduced VTE-free survival, VTE penetrance and phenotype severity did not differ significantly among homozygous vs. heterozygous carriers, suggesting that VTE prophylaxis and management should not differ by Factor V Leiden genotype.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which may manifest as pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT), is a serious and potentially fatal condition. Treatment and prevention of obstetric-related VTE is complicated by the need to consider fetal, as well as maternal, wellbeing when making management decisions. Although absolute VTE rates in this population are low, obstetric-associated VTE is an important cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. This manuscript, initiated by the Anticoagulation Forum, provides practical clinical guidance on the prevention and treatment of obstetric-associated VTE based on existing guidelines and consensus expert opinion based on available literature where guidelines are lacking.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been recently recognized as a complication of sickle cell disease (SCD); however, the incidence of VTE in SCD is unknown.

The primary objective of this study was to determine the incidence of first VTE, including pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), among SCD patients age ≥ 15 years. We also evaluated genotypic differences in VTE risk and determined the relationship between VTE and mortality.

In this retrospective cohort study, we used data from the Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease (CSSCD) to calculate incidence rates for first VTE. We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for time to VTE by genotype and time to death by VTE status.

We included 1523 SCD patients aged ≥ 15 years with 8862 years of follow-up in this analysis. The incidence rate for first VTE was 5.2 events/1000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.8-6.9) with a cumulative incidence of 11.3% (95% CI 8.3-15.3) by age 40 years. Individuals with the SS/Sβ(0) -thalassemia genotype had the highest rate of VTE (7.6 events/1000 person-years [95% CI 5.3-10.6]). The incidence of PE exceeded that of isolated DVT (3.6 [95% CI 2.5-5.1] events/1000 person-years vs. 1.6 [95% CI 0.9-2.7] events/1000 person-years), although this difference was not statistically significant. SCD patients with VTE had a higher mortality rate (adjusted HR 2.32 [95% CI 1.20-4.46]) than those without VTE.

Patients with SCD are at substantial risk for VTE, and individuals with VTE are at higher risk of death than those without VTE.

Sheehan's Syndrome (SS) is defined as pituitary hormone deficiency due to ischemic infarction of the pituitary gland as a result of massive postpartum uterine hemorrhage. Herein, we aimed to investigate the roles of Factor II (G20210A), Factor V (G1691A), MTHFR (C677T and A1298C), PAI-1 4G/5G, and TNF- α (-308  G > A) gene polymorphisms in the etiopathogenesis of SS. Venous blood samples were obtained from 53 cases with SS and 43 healthy women. Standard methods were used to extract the genomic DNAs. Factor II (G20210A), Factor V (G1691A), and MTHFR (C677T and A1298C) polymorphisms were identified by real-time PCR. PAI-1 4G/5G and TNF- α (-308  G > A) gene polymorphisms were detected with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) methods. According to statistical analysis, none of the polymorphisms were found to be significantly higher in the SS group compared to the control group. Hence, we suggest that genetic factors other than Factor II, Factor V, MTHFR, PAI-1, and TNF- α gene polymorphisms should be researched in the etiopathogenesis of SS.

Approximately half of all pregnancy-related venous thromboembolic events are associated with thrombophilia. Although the most compelling data for a link between thrombophilia and other adverse pregnancy outcomes derive from women with antiphospholipid antibodies, some studies also suggest an association between these pregnancy complications and hereditary thrombophilias. Management of thrombophilia often involves anticoagulant therapy; however, use of these agents during pregnancy is challenging. There is a paucity of high-quality studies and consequently, recommendations are based largely on extrapolation from data in nonpregnant women, in addition to observational studies and a few small randomized studies. This article will review the impact of the thrombophilias on pregnancy and its outcome, evidence for therapies aimed at the prevention of thrombophilia-related pregnancy complications, and the most recent recommendations contained in the 9th Edition of the American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

To evaluate the course of pregnancy and puerperium in asymptomatic carriers of FV Leiden and FII prothrombin mutation in heterozygous configuration in terms of risk of thrombembolic disease (TED) and late pregnancy complications. To evaluate whether global prophylactic LMWH administration during pregnancy benefits these women.

We monitored the incidence of thrombembolic events and severe late pregnancy complications in 473 asymptomatic carriers of FV Leiden and FII prothrombin mutation in heterozygous configuration. In 253 women, preventive LMWH application was introduced already during pregnancy. In 220 women, the application of LMWH was commenced as late as on the delivery day. In both groups application of LMWH continued during the puerperium.

The incidence of TED in the whole group of carriers of thrombophylic mutations accounted for 0.19%. The incidence of severe late pregnancy complications was low - 2.5% compared with general population of pregnant women (6.4%).

No direct causal relationship was established between asymptomatic carriage of Leiden and prothrombin mutation in heterozygous configuration and the occurrence of severe late pregnancy complications. There was no benefit from general LMWH prophylaxis started as early as pregnancy in these women and thus we consider it unnecessary.

Factor V Leiden mutation is the most common inherited predisposition for hypercoagulability and thereby a common genetic cause for initiation of oral anti-coagulation therapy. There is a dearth of knowledge of coumarin response profile in such thrombophilic population.

The current pilot study aims to estimate coumarin sensitivity in an Indian cohort with an inherited thrombophilia risk factor (Factor V Leiden mutation carriers) based on the observed frequency of CYP2C9 (*)2, (*)3 and VKORC1-1639G >A genotype combinations.

A retrospective study carried out in a tertiary health care center in India.

Carriers of FVL mutation were genotyped for CYP2C9 ((*)2, F(*)3) and VKORC1 (-1639G >A) variants by PCR-RFLP technique.

Chi-square test to analyze difference in expected and observed genotype frequency.

Sixty-one (n = 61) unrelated carriers of FVL mutation were observed in the 13 years study period. The allele frequency of CYP2C9 (*)2, CYP2C9 (*)3, and VKORC1-1639A in this cohort was 0.06, 0.11, and 0.16, respectively. Six (9.7%) individuals had two of the three variant alleles (heterozygous or homozygous), and 28 (45.9%) were heterozygous for at least one polymorphism.

Pre-prescription genotyping for coumarin drugs, if introduced in Indians with inherited thrombophilia (in whom oral anti-coagulant therapy may be necessary), is likely to identify 9.7% (hypersensitive) subjects in whom the optimum anti-coagulation may be achieved with reduced dosages, 44.3% (normal sensitivity) who may require higher dose and also 55.6% (hyper and moderate sensitivity) subjects who are likely to experience bleeding episodes.

Traumatic vascular injuries to the lower limb are frequent in athletes, particularly in sports characterized by high-speed collisions. However, the diagnosis is not always straightforward, for the lack of clearly visible abnormalities without provocative testing or appropriate imaging. The failure of an early diagnosis can lead to devastating consequences. In these subjects, it may be useful to investigate the personal susceptibility to thrombotic events such as the presence of a hereditary hypercoagulable state. We experienced a case of a soccer player with progressive swelling and severe pain of the calf after a trauma during a football match 3 days previously, who came to our hospital for suspected deep vein thrombosis, confirmed by echo-Doppler ultrasound. A thrombophilia screening detected a double heterozygosity for factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutation in the presence of a strong family history for thromboembolism. Immediate treatment with elastic stocking compression and enoxaparin was started. The patient was discharged on warfarin therapy maintained for six months, with the warning to avoid trauma activities during anticoagulation. Thrombotic genetic testing in athletes who experience episodes of deep vein thrombosis might offer important opportunities for patient management, such as prolonged anticoagulant therapy or avoidance of risk factors such as trauma-related sports.

Pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and this condition remains an important cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. The use of anticoagulant therapy for treatment and prophylaxis of VTE during pregnancy is challenging because of the potential for fetal, as well as maternal, complications. Although evidence-based recommendations for the use of anticoagulants have been published, given the paucity of available data, guidelines are based largely upon observational studies and from data in nonpregnant patients. This article reviews the available literature and provides guidance for the management and prevention of VTE during pregnancy.

Compounds that are systemically absorbed during the course of cigarette smoking, and their metabolites, affect the coagulation system and cause endothelial dysfunction, dyslipidemia, and platelet activation leading to a prothrombotic state. In addition, smoking increases the activity of fibrinogen, homocysteine, and C-reactive protein. We hypothesize that smoking may affect functional coagulation testing during pregnancy. A secondary analysis of 371 women pregnant with a singleton pregnancy and enrolled in a multicenter, prospective observational study of complications of factor V Leiden mutation subsequently underwent functional coagulation testing for antithrombin III, protein C antigen and activity, and protein S antigen and activity. Smoking was assessed by self-report at time of enrollment (<14 weeks). None of the functional coagulation testing results was altered by maternal smoking during pregnancy. Smoking does not affect the aforementioned functional coagulation testing results during pregnancy.

The use of anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy is challenging because of the potential for both fetal and maternal complications. This guideline focuses on the management of VTE and thrombophilia as well as the use of antithrombotic agents during pregnancy.

The methods of this guideline follow the Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines in this supplement.

We recommend low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention and treatment of VTE in pregnant women instead of unfractionated heparin (Grade 1B). For pregnant women with acute VTE, we suggest that anticoagulants be continued for at least 6 weeks postpartum (for a minimum duration of therapy of 3 months) compared with shorter durations of treatment (Grade 2C). For women who fulfill the laboratory criteria for antiphospholipid antibody (APLA) syndrome and meet the clinical APLA criteria based on a history of three or more pregnancy losses, we recommend antepartum administration of prophylactic or intermediate-dose unfractionated heparin or prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin combined with low-dose aspirin (75-100 mg/d) over no treatment (Grade 1B). For women with inherited thrombophilia and a history of pregnancy complications, we suggest not to use antithrombotic prophylaxis (Grade 2C). For women with two or more miscarriages but without APLA or thrombophilia, we recommend against antithrombotic prophylaxis (Grade 1B).

Most recommendations in this guideline are based on observational studies and extrapolation from other populations. There is an urgent need for appropriately designed studies in this population.

Factor V Leiden is a genetic disorder characterized by a poor anticoagulant response to activated Protein C and an increased risk for venous thromboembolism. Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are the most common manifestations, but thrombosis in unusual locations also occurs. The current evidence suggests that the mutation has at most a modest effect on recurrence risk after initial treatment of a first venous thromboembolism. Factor V Leiden is also associated with a 2- to 3-fold increased relative risk for pregnancy loss and possibly other obstetric complications, although the probability of a successful pregnancy outcome is high. The clinical expression of Factor V Leiden is influenced by the number of Factor V Leiden alleles, coexisting genetic and acquired thrombophilic disorders, and circumstantial risk factors. Diagnosis requires the activated Protein C resistance assay (a coagulation screening test) or DNA analysis of the F5 gene, which encodes the Factor V protein. The first acute thrombosis is treated according to standard guidelines. Decisions regarding the optimal duration of anticoagulation are based on an individualized assessment of the risks for venous thromboembolism recurrence and anticoagulant-related bleeding. In the absence of a history of thrombosis, long-term anticoagulation is not routinely recommended for asymptomatic Factor V Leiden heterozygotes, although prophylactic anticoagulation may be considered in high-risk clinical settings. In the absence of evidence that early diagnosis reduces morbidity or mortality, decisions regarding testing at-risk family members should be made on an individual basis.

The pathophysiology of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation (AF) is a multifactorial and complex process. Abnormalities of haemostasis, fibrinolysis, endothelium, and platelets have all been described in AF. This prothrombotic state observed in AF appears to be additive to the presence of clinical and echocardiography risk factors for thromboembolism. Nonetheless, the precise mechanistic pathway(s) leading to the prothrombotic state in AF remain to be elucidated. Of note, there are limited data on the influence of genetic polymorphisms in thromboembolic risk associated with AF. On the other hand, the response to coumarin derivatives depends on several factors, such as sex, age, diet, or interacting drugs. Optimal anticoagulation control is usually hampered by significant interindividual variability in dose requirements for a given target level of anticoagulation. There is increasing evidence that interindividual sensitivity and side-effects to coumarinics may be largely determined genetically. Thus, genetic polymorphisms could explain the individual risk of developing an adverse drug reaction (bleeding) or drug inefficacy (thrombosis) with oral anticoagulation. In this article, we provide an overview of the limited data about the possible influence of genetic polymorphisms on thromboembolic risk in AF, as well as the genetic influences on anticoagulant drug responsiveness.

To determine a proximate family history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in (1) the prevalence of thrombophilia; (2) the frequency of recommended changes in management resulting from thrombophilia evaluation; and (3) outcomes in longitudinal follow-up.

Laboratory thrombophilia investigation was performed in 56 children with first- or second-degree family history of thromboembolism before age 55 years, but without personal history of thromboembolism, who were enrolled in a prospective inception cohort. VTE risk factors, family history, thrombophilia findings, and management recommendations were systematically collected, along with thromboembolism risk episodes/exposures, prophylactic anticoagulation, major bleeds, and thromboembolism events during follow-up.

The frequencies of all thrombophilia traits were higher than the general population. Among 32 children who underwent complete laboratory evaluation, 34% had >or=2 traits. Thrombophilia testing led to recommendations for risk-based transient antithrombotic prophylaxis in 71% of subjects. No thromboembolism episodes developed during more than 900 patient-months of follow-up, although at-risk exposures were infrequent.

Risk-stratified approaches to primary prevention of pediatric VTE should be further evaluated in cooperative prospective studies.

Factor V Leiden (FVL) increases the risk of venous thrombosis and pregnancy loss in carriers. Nevertheless, this relatively old mutation is prevalent in Caucasion populations, which could be explained by positive selection pressure. Men with FVL have previously been found to have higher fecundity (the time between marriage and first pregnancy). Whether this is caused by increased sperm counts in men with FVL is unknown.

To assess whether men with factor V Leiden have increased sperm counts.

We performed a prospective cohort study among 1139 consecutively included male partners of subfertile couples presenting at our university hospital for fertility workup between January 2000 and July 2007. All potential candidates who gave informed consent were included, irrespective of their fertility workup. In this retrospective analysis, we excluded participants with known causes of spermatogenic function or azoospermia. Subsequently, we genotyped all participants and compared sperm counts between FVL carriers and non-carriers.

We identified 37 FVL carriers and 921 non-carriers. FVL carriers had higher total sperm counts and total motile sperm counts than non-carriers: 236 x 10(6) (95% CI 158-292 x 10(6)) vs. 163 x 10(6) (95% CI 147-178 x 10(6)) and 81 x 10(6) (95% CI 54-105 x 10(6)) vs. 52 x 10(6) (95% CI 48-57 x 10(6)), respectively.

To our knowledge, this is the first study that indicates that an increased incidence of a genotype may be controlled by increased sperm counts. However, the finding that men with FVL had higher total (motile) sperm counts was not statistically significant and needs confirmation in other studies.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the leading cause of maternal mortality in the developed world. Mortality from PE in pregnancy might be related to challenges in targeting the right population for prevention, ensuring that diagnosis is suspected and adequately investigated, and initiating timely and best possible treatment of this disease. Pregnancy is an example of Virchow's triad: hypercoagulability, venous stasis, and vascular damage; together these factors lead to an increased incidence of venous thromboembolism. This disorder is often suspected in pregnant women because some of the physiological changes of pregnancy mimic its signs and symptoms. Despite concerns for fetal teratogenicity and oncogenicity associated with diagnostic testing, and potential adverse effects of pharmacological treatment, an accurate diagnosis of PE and a timely therapeutic intervention are crucial. Appropriate prophylaxis should be weighed against the risk of complications and offered according to risk stratification.

This review summarizes the currently available data concerning risk and management of venous thromboembolism in pregnant women with inherited thrombophilia.

Pregnancy is a hypercoagulable state, and inherited thrombophilia increases this risk further. Despite the risks, the actual incidence of venous thromboembolism remains low, and therefore, the widespread use of anticoagulants for pregnant women with inherited thrombophilia is not advised. Although randomized, placebo-controlled trials investigating the risks and benefits of anticoagulation have not been performed, there are data to support the use of low molecular weight heparin for high and intermediate-risk women. We will review these data and treatment recommendations, which are based on retrospective and case-control studies as well as expert opinion and consensus statements.