Esophageal cancer is among the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in males. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nedaplatin (NDP) in comparison to other platinum-based (OPB) agents combined with paclitaxel and concurrent neoadjuvant radiotherapy for locally advanced thoracic segmental esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

This single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted in China. The primary endpoints of this study were safety and efficacy assessments. Unpaired t-tests, chi-squared tests, and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare intergroup differences, as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to explore the associations between postoperative outcomes and the two treatment groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression models based on OS and PFS were used to compare the efficacy between the two groups.

A total of 212 patients were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study, including 79 who received NDP and 133 who received OPB (82 were treated with cisplatin, 20 with carboplatin, 19 with lobaplatin, and 12 with oxaliplatin) agents. The incidences of grade 3-4 acute radiotherapy-associated esophagitis, pneumonitis, and leukemia were significantly lower in the NDP group than in the OPB group (p = 0.02, p < 0.001, and p = 0.002, respectively). All grades of acute gastrointestinal reactions, including nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and diarrhea, were significantly more frequent in the OPB group than in the NPD group (p < 0.001, p = 0.032, p < 0.001, and p = 0.002, respectively). The Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) showed similar results for both groups.

The safety profile of nedaplatin may be superior to those of other platinum-based agents in terms of acute radiotherapy toxicity and postoperative side effects; however, there was no difference in the efficacy between the two groups regarding short-term prognostic tumor regression grades or long-term OS and PFS.

This study aims to examine the recurrence patterns in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. Retrospective analysis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received neoadjuvant Chemo-IO before surgery at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between 2019 and 2023. The clinicopathological features, recurrence patterns, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed, and the impact of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy on prognosis was evaluated. In total, 422 patients were included in the study. After a median follow-up of 22 months, disease recurrence was observed in 89 (21.1%) patients, comprising 37 cases (8.8%) of locoregional recurrence, 30 cases (7.1%) of distant metastasis, and 22 cases (5.2%) of combined recurrence. Patients who achieved a pathologic complete response demonstrated significantly higher 3-year OS rates (90.0% vs. 72.5%; P = 0.01) and DFS rates (73.2% vs. 61.8%; P = 0.046). Univariable and multivariable analyses identified pathological lymph node staging (ypN0 vs. ypN+; HR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.01-2.99; P = 0.047) as an independent prognostic factor for locoregional recurrence. Kaplan-Meier curves for OS and DFS demonstrated that postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) significantly improved OS and DFS in ypN+ patients after propensity score matching. Additionally, PORT significantly enhanced locoregional recurrence-free survival and distant recurrence-free survival in ypN+ patients. In patients receiving neoadjuvant Chemo-IO, locoregional recurrence is the predominant recurrence pattern. For ypN+ patients, PORT significantly improved survival outcomes. However, long-term outcomes require further investigation through randomized controlled trials.

Esophageal squamous carcinoma is a prevalent cancer worldwide, particularly in China. Few studies have compared the treatment effects of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on the long-term prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma. This study analyzed the 3-year overall survival rate of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous carcinoma treated with esophagectomy after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

A total of 309 patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy between 2010 and 2020 and 88 who underwent neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy between 2019 and 2020 at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital were included in this study. Propensity score matching with a 1:1 ratio and a caliper of 0.02 was used to balance the baseline characteristics.

The study included 397 patients with locally advanced thoracic segmental esophageal squamous carcinoma, including 88 who received neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and 309 who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in pathologic complete response between the 2 groups (21.3% vs 33.3%, χ2 = 2.148, P = .143), and the neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy group demonstrated a greater 3-year overall survival rate (73.8% vs 54.8%, P = .003), particularly for patients with a primary stage Ⅲ diagnosis (T3N1M0, T1-3N2M0) or an initial suspicion of lymph node metastases. Pathologic complete response emerged as a reliable predictor of long-term outcomes in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, but not in those receiving neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy was associated with improved long-term prognosis in patients with a primary stage Ⅲ diagnosis or an initial suspicion of lymph node metastases. Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy plus surgery emerged as an effective therapeutic strategy for treating locally advanced thoracic segmental esophageal squamous carcinoma.

Esophageal cancer has a poor prognosis and survival rate due to its high incidence in Asia, lack of early symptoms and limited treatment options. In recent years, many clinical trials have demonstrated that immunotherapy has greatly improved the survival of patients with esophageal cancer. In addition, the combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy with other popular therapeutic regimens has shown good efficacy and safety. In this review, we summarize the progress of clinical trials and some breakthroughs in neoadjuvant immunotherapy for esophageal cancer in recent years and suggest the possibility of multimodal neoadjuvant immunotherapy regimens, as well as directions for future development.

To explore whether neoadjuvant Sintilimab is suitable for patients with gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, we designed this study to evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant Sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy for resectable GEJ adenocarcinoma.

We retrospectively collected data on patients with GEJ adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery after receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy at Jining First People's Hospital between October 2020 and October 2023. The primary endpoint was complete pathological response (pCR) rate; secondary endpoints: major pathological response (MPR) rate, neoadjuvant therapy-related adverse events (AES), the safety of surgery, Postoperative Complications, and overall survival (OS).

24 eligible patients were enrolled in the study and achieved a pCR rate of 16.7%. The treatment-related AES was manageable. The median time interval between the end of neoadjuvant therapy and surgery was 35 days (28-81 days), R0 resection rate was 100%. The most common postoperative complications in the study were pneumonia (n = 11, 45.8%). Median follow-up was 13.5(interquartile range: 8.00, 25.50) months, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed median OS was not reached.

It was safe and effective for resectable GEJ adenocarcinoma to undergo neoadjuvant Sintilimab combined with chemotherapy followed by surgery, and long-term efficacy needs to be confirmed by further follow-up.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and construct a prognostic model.

Clinical data were retrospectively collected from patients with locally advanced ESCC who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were major pathologic remission rate and disease-free survival, and secondary endpoints were treatment-related adverse events and perioperative complications. Correlates affecting pathological response were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression, survival-related variables were screened by Boruta and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression analysis. A nomogram was constructed and utilized to test the predictive efficacy of the treatment with receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve analysis.

A total of 181 patients were enrolled, of whom 119 (66 %) patients received 3-4 cycles of treatment. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 65.2 % of the patients, with 13.3 % experiencing severe complications. Major pathological remission rate was achieved in 68 (37.6 %) patients, with no significant difference between the treatment cycle groups (P=0.925). The nomogram included pathologic TNM stage, lymphovascular invasion, post-treatment and post-surgery albumin levels, and post-treatment systemic immune-inflammation index. One-year disease-free survival area under the curve was 0.86 (95 %CI, 0.75-0.97) in the derivation cohort and 0.75 (95 %CI, 0.50-0.99) in the validation cohort, with good calibration performance.

Pathological staging combined with albumin level and systemic immune-inflammation index could be a superior predictor of survival prognosis in ESCC patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy. The findings of this study yield new evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in ESCC and provide a tool for identifying patients at risk of recurrence.

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is a cancer with high morbidity and mortality. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has significantly increased complete response rates and postoperative R0 resection rates after neoadjuvant therapy. These drugs can largely reverse the suppression of the immune system caused by the tumor microenvironment, allowing the reactivation of anti-tumor immune infiltrating cells, significantly improving the patient's tumor microenvironment, and thus preventing tumor development. However, there are still some patients who respond poorly to neoadjuvant combined immunotherapy and cannot achieve the expected results. It is now found that exploring changes in the tumor microenvironment not only elucidates patient responsiveness to immunotherapy and identifies more reliable biomarkers, but also addresses the limitations of prediction with imaging examination such as CT and the instability of existing biomarkers. In light of these considerations, this review aims to delve into the alterations within the tumor microenvironment and identify potential predictive biomarkers ensuing from neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the context of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

This study aimed to examine the individualized neoadjuvant therapies for operable esophageal cancer.

Data of 95,444 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer between 2010 and 2017 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), and surgery alone was compared in patients with stage II esophageal cancer. Patients with stage III disease were divided into "local invasive type" group (type I, T3N1M0, T4N0-1M0) and "regional metastatic type" group (type II, T1-2N2-3M0) according to the tumor invasion pattern. The effectiveness of nCRT and nCT in different patterns was compared.

In 2,706 patients with stage II disease, a statistical difference was observed in the overall survival (OS) between nCRT (85.1%), nCT (3.0%), and surgery alone (11.9%, P<0.001, median OS (mOS): 54 vs 41 vs 24 months). Meanwhile, 3,303 patients with stage III disease who received nCRT were included in the propensity score matching. A statistical difference was observed in the OS between "Type I" (n = 217) and "Type II" (n = 217, P = 0.023, mOS: 45 VS 28 months). Among 93 patients with stage III receiving nCT, those with "Type II" (23.7%) showed a greater potential benefit from nCT than those with "Type I" (76.3%, P = 0.686, mOS: 51 vs 40 months).

nCRT is recommended for stage II esophageal cancer. In patients with stage III, those with "local invasive type" may greatly benefit from nCRT, while those with "regional metastatic type" may greatly benefit from nCT.

This study aims to analyze the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) blockade plus chemotherapy in real-world applications. Additionally, we report survival outcomes with a median follow-up of 40.1 months.

From January 2018 to October 2022, we retrospectively recruited patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent surgery after receiving PD-1 blockade (immunotherapy) plus chemotherapy at Jiangsu Cancer Hospital.

A total of 132 eligible ESCC patients were included, and R0 resection was achieved in 131 cases (99.2 %). A complete pathological response rate (ypT0N0) was observed in 32 patients (24.2 %), and the objective response rate was 59.1 %. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were leukopenia (18.2 %) and neutropenia (15.9 %). Three cases (2.3 %) of grade 3 immune-related AEs were observed, including increased ALT (0.8 %), rash (0.8 %), and encephalitis (0.8 %). The 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 68.2 % and 89.4 %, respectively, and the 2-year DFS and OS rates were 55.1 % and 78.6 %, respectively. The pathological responses of 103 cases (94.5 % of 109) of the index lymph node (ILN) were categorized as the worst regression subgroup. In these cases, using the pathological response of the ILN to indicate the status of other lymph nodes would not result to a missed therapeutic lymph node dissection.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy is safe and effective for ESCC, with observable survival benefits. The pathological response of the ILN after neoadjuvant therapy may have important value in guiding therapeutic lymph node dissection.

Despite the recognized therapeutic potential of programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), their role in neoadjuvant therapy and reliable efficacy biomarkers remain elusive.

We retrospectively analyzed locally advanced ESCC patients who underwent surgery following a 2-cycle platinum and paclitaxel-based treatment, with or without PD-1 inhibitors (January 2020-March 2023). We assessed peripheral blood indexes and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) density to evaluate their impact on pathological response and prognosis, leading to a clinical prediction model for treatment efficacy and survival.

Of the 157 patients recruited, 106 received immunochemotherapy (ICT) and 51 received chemotherapy (CT) alone. The ICT group demonstrated a superior pathological response rate (PRR) (47.2% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.034) with comparable adverse events and postoperative complications. The ICT group also showed a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 39.8 months, unattained by the CT group. The 1-year DFS and overall survival (OS) rates were 73% and 91% for the ICT group, and 68% and 81% for the CT group, respectively. We found higher baseline activated T cells, lower baseline Treg cells, and a decreased posttreatment total lymphocyte and CD4+/CD8+ ratio predicted an enhanced PRR. Reduced posttreatment CD4+/CD8+ ratio and increased NK cells were associated with prolonged survival, while higher TLS density indicated poorer prognosis. Among ICT group, a lower posttreatment CD4+/CD8+ ratio indicated longer DFS and reduced posttreatment B cells indicated longer OS. A nomogram integrating these predictors was developed to forecast treatment efficacy and survival.

The combination of PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy appears promising for locally advanced ESCC. Evaluating the differentiation status and dynamic changes of peripheral blood immune cells may provide valuable predictive insights into treatment efficacy and prognosis.

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has a promising effect on locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, reliable biomarkers robustly predicting therapeutic response are still lacking.

Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded pre-neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy biopsy samples from locally advanced ESCC patients were collected. Cohort 1 composed of 66 locally advanced ESCC patients from a prospective clinical trial (NCT04506138) received two cycles of camrelizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin every 3 weeks. Cohort 2 included 48 patients receiving various types of immune checkpoint inhibitors with (nab-)paclitaxel and platinum-based chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy. Cohort 3 consisted of 27 ESCC patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment of toripalimab with chemotherapy and was used as the external validation dataset. Targeted RNA sequencing, immunohistochemistry for programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) imaging were performed.

Integration of targeted RNA sequencing, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, and mIF revealed a significant immune-suppressive microenvironment with higher neutrophil infiltration, enriched TGF-β, and cell cycle pathways in non-pathological complete response (non-pCR) patients. NK, activated CD4+ T cell infiltration, interferon-gamma, antigen processing and presentation, and other immune response signatures were significantly associated with pCR. Based on discovered tumor microenvironmental characteristics and their closely related genes were screened. Consequently, a seven-gene neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy risk prediction signature (NCIRPs) model, was constructed. In addition to cohort 1, this model alone or with PD-L1-combined positive score (CPS) demonstrated a higher prediction accuracy of pathological response than PD-L1 CPS or other routinely used immune signatures, such as IFN-γ, in cohorts 2 and 3. Neither prognostic association nor correlation with response to chemoradiotherapy was observed in The Cancer Genome Atlas Program ESCC dataset or in ESCC patients in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy cohort (cohort 4).

The NCIRPs model that was developed and validated using treatment-naïve endoscopic samples from the largest ESCC neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy dataset represents a robust and clinically meaningful approach to select a putative responder for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in locally advanced ESCC patients.

To date, few studies have compared effectiveness and survival rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (NACI) and conventional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The present study was conducted to compare therapeutic response and survival between NACI and NCRT.

The study cohort comprised patients with locally advanced ESCC treated with either NACI or NCRT followed by surgery between June 2018 and March 2021. The 2 groups were compared for treatment response, 3-year overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Survival curves were created using the Kaplan-Meier method, differences were compared using the log-rank test, and potential imbalances were corrected for using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method.

Among 202 patients with locally advanced ESCC, 81 received NACI and 121 received conventional NCRT. After IPTW adjustment, the R0 resection rate (85.2% vs 92.3%; P = .227) and the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate (27.5% vs 36.4%; P = .239) were comparable between the 2 groups. Nevertheless, patients who received NACI exhibited both a better 3-year OS rate (91.7% vs 79.8%; P = .032) and a better 3-year DFS rate (87.4% vs 72.8%; P = .039) compared with NCRT recipients.

NACI has R0 resection and pCR rates comparable to those of NCRT and seems to be correlated with better prognosis than NCRT. NACI followed by surgery may be an effective treatment strategy for locally advanced ESCC.

In locally advanced esophageal cancer, the controversy over the two traditional treatment modalities, neoadjuvant radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, has been unending and also challenged by the addition of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has led to an increasing diversity of neoadjuvant combination treatment modalities, among which neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy has emerged, with current clinical studies initially demonstrating its efficacy and safety. We report a case of a patient with locally advanced esophageal cancer who underwent two cycles of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and successful surgery and achieved a pathological complete response (pCR). A 73-year-old elderly female patient presented with progressive dysphagia for more than 1 month with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 1. After completing gastroscopy + pathological biopsy, chest enhanced CT, barium esophageal meal, PET-CT, and other related examinations, the clinical diagnosis was thoracic segmental esophageal poorly differentiated squamous carcinoma cT2N2M0 stage III. After a multidisciplinary discussion of the comprehensive treatment plan, two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy were given on February 16, 2023, and March 9, 2023, and the treatment plan was as follows: cisplatin 30 mg d1-3 + albumin paclitaxel 200 mg d1 and 100 mg d8 + sintilimab 200 mg d4, q3w. After the neoadjuvant therapy, the patient underwent an imaging examination. The chest enhanced CT suggested that the lesion range was significantly reduced compared with the previous scan, and mediastinal lymph nodes were partially reduced. Then, thoracoscopic radical esophageal cancer surgery was performed on April 23, 2023. pCR was achieved by pathological evaluation, and the postoperative diagnosis was thoracic segmental esophageal hypofractionated squamous carcinoma ypT0N0M0. Two cycles of adjuvant immunochemotherapy were performed after surgery on May 30, 2023, and June 21, 2023, and the regimen was as follows: cisplatin 30 mg d1-3 + albumin paclitaxel 200 mg d1 and 100 mg d8 + sindilizumab 200 mg d4, q3w. As of the latest review on March 20, 2024, the patient was not seen to have any significant postoperative complications and remains in a state of complete response (CR). Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy has positive significance for the treatment of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Whether neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy can replace neoadjuvant synchronous radiotherapy is a future direction of research, which needs to be further verified by more reliable clinical trials.

Antiangiogenic treatment and immunochemotherapy effectively treat patients with advanced esophageal cancer. However, there remains a dearth of studies concerning neoadjuvant therapy for resectable esophageal cancer.

The study focused on patients with T2-4NxM0 resectable esophageal carcinoma. Neoadjuvant treatment involved administering anlotinib (10 mg orally, once a day, 2 weeks on and 1 week off) for antiangiogenesis and sintilimab (200 mg) and chemotherapy for three cycles. Surgical treatment was performed 4-6 weeks after the last chemotherapy cycle was completed. The primary endpoints assessed were pathological complete response (pCR) and safety.

Out of the 34 screened patients, 17 were successfully enrolled in the study, and 14 completed the entire treatment process. The pCR was 35.3% (6/17). However, two patients experienced mortality. The occurring rate of grade 3 or higher complications after the surgery was 78.6% (11/14) according to Clavien-Dindo classification. Specifically, anastomotic leakage was observed in 57.1% (8/14) of the patients.

Compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the current regimen demonstrated improved pCR. However, it did not show significant improvement compared to immunochemotherapy. It is essential to exercise caution when using this treatment approach in patients with esophageal cancer as it might increase postoperative complications, especially anastomotic leakage.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) as a predictor of short-term postoperative complications in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.

Clinical data were collected from 77 patients undergoing radical esophageal cancer surgery after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy at Tongji Hospital from January 2022 to January 2023. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was utilized to establish the optimal cut-off point for the PNI. Subsequently, patients were stratified into low and high PNI groups according to this cut-off point, and comparisons were made between the two groups in terms of clinical data and postoperative complications.

Out of the 77 patients included in the study, 31 were categorized in the low PNI group and 46 in the high PNI group, with a defined cutoff point of 47.38. Significant statistical variances were noted in the occurrence rates of general complications (P < 0.001), pulmonary infections (P < 0.001), and anastomotic fistula (P = 0.034) between the two groups. The low PNI group displayed elevated rates of these complications in comparison to the high PNI group.

The research findings indicate that preoperative nutritional assessment using the PNI can effectively predict short-term postoperative complications in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients who have undergone neoadjuvant therapy. Furthermore, the results suggest that implementing nutritional interventions for patients with moderate-to-severe malnutrition, as indicated by preoperative PNI evaluation, may help reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.

The standard preoperative treatment for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is chemoradiotherapy in western countries (based on the CROSS trial) and triplet chemotherapy in Japan (based on the JCOG1109 trial). Postoperative nivolumab has recently been shown to improve disease-free survival in resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients who had residual pathological disease, based on the CheckMate 577 trial. Furthermore, preoperative immune checkpoint inhibitor-containing treatments have also been developed. The JCOG1804E trial is presently evaluating the safety and efficacy of preoperative nivolumab-containing chemotherapy for resectable locally advanced ESCC. This review discusses the treatment of resectable locally advanced ESCC and future perspectives on perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitor-containing treatments.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (nCT + ICIs) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy (nCRT + ICIs) both induced favorable pathological response and tolerant toxicities for locally resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, few studies compared safety and efficacy between the two treatment strategies.

This retrospective study collected clinical data of locally resectable ESCC patients who underwent nCT + ICIs or nCRT + ICIs followed by esophagectomy from November 2019 to December 2022. The incidence of adverse events, surgical outcomes, short and long-term efficacy, and treatment costs were compared.

A total of 206 patients were included, with a ratio of 158:48 between nCT + ICIs group and nCRT + ICIs group. The two groups exhibited well-balanced baseline characteristics. Most adverse events were grade 1-2 in both groups. The nCT + ICIs group had a longer operative time (334.00 ± 170.2 min vs 279.60 ± 88.31 min, P=0.020) than nCRT + ICIs group, but there were no differences in surgical complications. Although nCT + ICIs group had a lower pCR rate (32.3% vs 52.1%, P=0.004), the 2-year overall survival (84.42% vs 81.70%, P=0.860), 2-year disease-free survival (83.21% vs 80.47%, P=0.839), and recurrence patterns were similar to nCRT + ICIs group. In addition, nCT + ICIs group had significantly lower expenses (188796.00 ± 107704.00 RMB vs 231808.00 ± 48067.00 RMB, P=0.045).

Overall, nCT + ICIs have comparable safety and efficacy compared to nCRT + ICIs for locally resectable ESCC, but with lower hospitalization costs.

Esophageal cancer in one of the most malignant and hard-to-treat cancers. Esophageal squamous carcinoma (ESCC) is most common in Asian countries, whereas adenocarcinoma at the esophago-gastric junction (EGJ AC) is more prevalent in the Western countries. Due to differences in both genetic background and response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, both histologic subtypes need different paradigms of management. Since the landmark CROSS study has demonstrated the superior survival benefit of tri-modality including neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy prior to esophagectomy, the tri-modality becomes the standard of care; however, it is suitable for a highly-selected patient. Tri-modality should be offered for every ESCC patient, if a patient is fit for surgery with adequate cardiopulmonary reserve, regardless of ages. Definitive chemoradiotherapy remains the best option for a patient who is not a surgical candidate or declines surgery. On the contrary, owing to doubtful benefits of radiotherapy with potentially more toxicities related to radiotherapy in EGJ AC, either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or peri-operative chemotherapy would be more preferable in an EGJ AC patient. In case of very locally advanced disease (cT4b), the proper management is more challenging. Even though, palliative care is the safe option, multi-modality therapy with curative intent like neoadjuvant chemotherapy with conversion surgery may be worthwhile; however, it should be suggested on case-by-case basis.

The primary objective of this research is to devise a model to predict the pathologic complete response in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy (nICRT).

We retrospectively analyzed data from 60 ESCC patients who received nICRT between 2019 and 2023. These patients were divided into two cohorts: pCR-group (N = 28) and non-pCR group (N = 32). Radiomic features, discerned from the primary tumor region across plain, arterial, and venous phases of CT, and pertinent laboratory data were documented at two intervals: pre-treatment and preoperation. Concurrently, related clinical data was amassed. Feature selection was facilitated using the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm, with model validation conducted via fivefold cross-validation. The model's discriminating capability was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Additionally, the clinical applicability of the clinical-radiomic model was appraised through decision curve analysis (DCA).

The clinical-radiomic model incorporated seven significant markers: postHALP, ΔHB, post-ALB, firstorder_Skewness, GLCM_DifferenceAverage, GLCM_JointEntropy, GLDM_DependenceEntropy, and NGTDM_Complexity, to predict pCR. The XGBoost algorithm rendered an accuracy of 0.87 and an AUC of 0.84. Notably, the joint omics approach superseded the performance of solely radiomic or clinical model. The DCA further cemented the robust clinical utility of our clinical-radiomic model.

This study successfully formulated and validated a union omics methodology for anticipating the therapeutic outcomes of nICRT followed by radical surgical resection. Such insights are invaluable for clinicians in identifying potential nICRT responders among ESCC patients and tailoring optimal individualized treatment plans.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard nonoperative treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, local recurrence is still the main failure pattern, accounting for more than half of all treatment failures, indicating that the sensitivity of radiotherapy still needs to be improved. This trial aimed at demonstrating whether PD-1 inhibitors followed by chemoradiotherapy could promote esophageal tumor vascular normalization, alleviate hypoxia, and thus enhance radiosensitivity and improve local control.

We did a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial in China. Patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer were enrolled in this study. In induction phase, patients received two cycles of sintilimab, paclitaxel and carboplatin once per 21 days. In concurrent phase, patients were treated with five cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel once per week concurrent with radiotherapy of 50.4Gy delivered in 28 fractions. The primary endpoint was 2-year local control rate. Hypoxia and vessel normalization was assessed before and after induction phase using immunofluorescence and perfusion CT. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03985046).

Seventy-five patients with esophageal cancer were enrolled in this study between October 2019 and April 2021. The median follow-up of surviving patients was 33.6 months (IQR 29.3-35.7). The 2-year local control rate was 81.7% (95% confidence interval, 72.7%-90.7%), which was much higher than that in concurrent chemoradiation only (71.3%) in previous studies. Vascular normalization and hypoxia alleviation were observed in both biopsy specimens and perfusion CT.

The addition of induction immunotherapy to standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy could improve radiosensitivity for locally advanced esophageal cancer as non-surgical treatment. New treatment combination led to higher local control rate through promoting vascular normalization and alleviating hypoxia. Our findings suggest that induction immunotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy could be a potential option in future treatment.

National Natural Science Foundation of China and Shanghai Rising-Star Program.

Neoadjuvant administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable safety in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy with camrelizumab plus paclitaxel and nedaplatin for 2-4 cycles in ESCC.

Patients with locally advanced stage IIa-IIIb ESCC were enrolled in the study and received camrelizumab (200 mg), paclitaxel (155 mg/m 2 ), and nedaplatin (80 mg/m 2 ) intravenously on day one every 3 weeks. Patients underwent surgery after 2-4 cycles of treatment. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints included the major pathological response (MPR) rate, R0 resection rate, tumor regression, objective response rate (ORR), and disease-free survival (DFS). Programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in tumor tissues was measured and quantified using immunohistochemistry staining and combined positive score (CPS), respectively.

In total, 75 patients were enrolled and received neoadjuvant treatment. Of them, 45 (60%) received two cycles, 18 (24%) received three cycles, and 10 patients (13.3%) received four cycles of neoadjuvant therapy. Ultimately, 62 patients (82.7%) underwent surgery. The patients achieved a pCR of 27.4% (95% CI: 16.9-40.2), an MPR of 45.2% (95% CI: 33.1-59.2), and an ORR of 48.4% (95% CI: 35.5-61.4); all patients had an R0 resection. T and N downstaging occurred in 39 (62.9%) and 19 (30.6%) patients Moreover, patients with CPS ≥10 tended to have enhanced ORR, pCR, and MPR compared to those with CPS <10. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of grade 1-2 occurred in 59 (78.7%) patients, grade 3 TRAEs in four (5.3%), and one patient (1.3%) experienced a grade 4 TRAE.

Neoadjuvant camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy showed promising efficacy in locally advanced ESCC, with a manageable safety profile, when administered flexibly in two to four cycles.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) is recommended as the treatment standard for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The use of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting has gained attention. Multiple, clinical trials have explored the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT). We evaluated the differences in clinicopathologic outcomes and the patterns of lymphatic spread among patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), NCRT, and NICT before esophagectomy for locally advanced ESCC.

A total of 702 patients with ESCC who completed transthoracic esophagectomy followed neoadjuvant therapy were included. Pathological characteristics, including pathologic complete response (pCR), tumor regression grade (TRG) score and patterns of lymphatic spread, were evaluated.

Compared with the NCT group, the NCRT group and NICT group had an advantage in pathological response (P < 0.05). The pCR rate was 8.1% in the NCT group, 29.9% in the NCRT group, and 23.6% in the NICT group. The TRG score (P < 0.05) and pathologic T stage (P < 0.05) in the NCT group were significantly higher. Compared with NICT, NCRT can significantly reduce the rate of lymph node metastasis rate in station 1R (0 vs. 3.4%, P < 0.05) and 2R (1.1% vs. 6.8%, P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis according to the tumor location distribution showed that NICT group had higher lymph node metastasis rate in station 2R (9.1%) in middle thoracic cases (P < 0.05) and in station 18 (7.5%) (P < 0.05) in lower thoracic cases.

NCRT or NICT followed by surgery may result in a promising pCR rate and show a better performance in therapeutic response of primary lesion. For patients with lymph node metastasis in station 1R and 2R, NCRT should be the optimal preoperative treatment strategy.

Locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC) poses a significant and persistent challenge in terms of effective treatment. Traditionally, the primary strategy for managing LAEC has involved concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery. However, achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) has proven to be inconsistent, and despite treatment, roughly half of patients experience locoregional recurrence or metastasis. Consequently, there has been a paradigm shift towards exploring the potential of immunotherapy in reshaping the landscape of LAEC management. Recent research has particularly focused on immune checkpoint inhibitors, investigating their application in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. These inhibitors, designed to block specific proteins in immune cells, are meant to enhance the immune system's ability to target and combat cancer cells. Emerging evidence from these studies suggests the possibility of a mortality benefit, indicating that immunotherapy may contribute to improved overall survival rates for individuals grappling with esophageal cancer. This manuscript aims to meticulously review the existing literature surrounding neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy in the context of LAEC management. The intention is to thoroughly examine the methodologies and findings of relevant studies, providing a comprehensive synthesis of the current understanding of the impact of immunotherapy on esophageal cancer.

Despite advances in treatment strategies and surgical approaches in recent years, improving survival outcomes in esophagogastric cancer (EGC) patients treated with curative intent remains a significant area of unmet need. The recent emergence of adjuvant immunotherapy as the standard of care for resected EGC demonstrates the impact of immunotherapy in improving recurrence-free survival. Neoadjuvant and perioperative immunotherapies represent another promising approach with potential advantages over adjuvant therapy. Despite the promising results of early neoadjuvant immunotherapy studies, there are several challenges and future research needs. The optimal timing, duration and number of doses in relation to surgery and the optimal combination of immunotherapies are still unclear. In addition, rigorous correlative studies need to be performed to identify biomarkers for patient selection and treatment response prediction to maximize the benefits of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. In this review, we provide a concise summary of the current standard of care for resectable EGC and discuss the rationale for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in this setting and the pre-clinical and early clinical data of these novel therapies. Finally, we will examine the potential role and future direction of immunotherapy in the treatment paradigm and the perceived challenges and opportunities that lay ahead.

Esophageal cancer (EC) ranks among the most prevalent malignant tumors affecting the digestive tract. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) stands as the prevailing pathological subtype, encompassing approximately 90% of all EC patients. In clinical stage II-IVA locally advanced ESCC cases, the primary approach to treatment involves a combination of neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection. Despite concerted efforts, the long-term outcomes for ESCC patients remain unsatisfactory, with dismal prognoses. However, recent years have witnessed remarkable strides in immunotherapy, particularly in the second- and first-line treatment of advanced or metastatic ESCC, with the development of monoclonal antibodies that inhibit programmed death 1 or programmed death ligand 1 demonstrating encouraging responses and perioperative clinical benefits for various malignancies, including ESCC. This comprehensive review aims to present the current landscape of perioperative immunotherapy for resectable ESCC, focusing specifically on the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors during the perioperative period. Additionally, the review will explore promising biomarkers and offer insights into future prospects.

One of the most prevalent malignancies in the world is esophageal cancer (EC). The 5-year survival rate of EC remains pitiful despite treatment advancements. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in conjunction with esophagectomy is the standard of care for patients with resectable disease. The pathological complete response rate, however, is not acceptable. A distant metastasis or a locoregional recurrence will occur in about half of the patients. To increase the clinical effectiveness of therapy, it is consequently vital to investigate cutting-edge and potent therapeutic modalities. The approach to the management of resectable EC using immunotherapy has been considerably altered by immune checkpoint inhibitors. Systemic immunotherapy has recently been shown to have the potential to increase the survival of patients with resectable EC, according to growing clinical data. A combination of chemotherapy, radiation, and immunotherapy may have a synergistic antitumor impact because, according to mounting evidence, these treatments can stimulate the immune system via a number of different pathways. In light of this, it makes sense to consider the value of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for patients with surgically treatable EC. In this review, we clarify the rationale for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable EC patients, recap the clinical outcomes of these approaches, go through the upcoming and ongoing investigations, and emphasize the difficulties and unmet research requirements.

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a common malignancy worldwide and often diagnosed at advanced stages with poor prognosis. Combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy seems to be a promising approach for treating ESCC. This comprehensive review article summarizes the current state of combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy in locally advanced/metastatic ESCC, delineates the clinical trials that merit attention, and outlines unresolved issues and future research directions in this field. The clinical trial findings suggest that radio-immunotherapy combination may improve tumor response and overall survival with manageable side effects, highlighting the importance of patient selection and the necessity for further research to optimize treatment strategies. Issues such as irradiation dosage, fractionation regimen, irradiation site and technique of radiotherapy, as well as the timing, sequence and duration of combination therapy will all affect treatment outcomes, justifying further in-depth investigation.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the role of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy with or without radiotherapy [NIC(R)T] compared to traditional neoadjuvant therapies, without immunotherapy [NC(R)T].

NCRT followed by surgical resection is recommended for patients with early-stage esophageal cancer. However, it is uncertain whether adding immunotherapy to preoperative neoadjuvant therapy would improve patient outcomes when radical surgery is performed following neoadjuvant therapy.

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases, as well as international conference abstracts. Outcomes included R0, pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (mPR), overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates.

We included data from 5,034 patients from 86 studies published between 2019 and 2022. We found no significant differences between NICRT and NCRT in pCR or mPR rates. Both were better than NICT, with NCT showing the lowest response rate. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has a significant advantage over traditional neoadjuvant therapy in terms of 1-year OS and DFS, with NICT having better outcomes than any of the other three treatments. There were no significant differences among the four neoadjuvant treatments in terms of R0 rates.

Among the four neoadjuvant treatment modalities, NICRT and NCRT had the highest pCR and mPR rates. There were no significant differences in the R0 rates among the four treatments. Adding immunotherapy to neoadjuvant therapy improved 1-year OS and DFS, with NICT having the highest rates compared to the other three modalities.

https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-12-0060/, identifier INPLASY2022120060.

Advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) still has a dismal prognostic outcome. However, the current approaches are unable to evaluate patient survival. Pyroptosis represents a novel programmed cell death type which widely investigated in various disorders and can influence tumor growth, migration, and invasion. Furthermore, few existing studies have used pyroptosis-related genes (PRGs) to construct a model for predicting ESCC survival. Therefore, the present study utilized bioinformatics approaches for analyzing ESCC patient data obtained from the TCGA database to construct the prognostic risk model and applied it to the GSE53625 dataset for validation. There were 12 differentially expressed PRGs in healthy and ESCC tissue samples, among which eight were selected through univariate and LASSO cox regression for constructing the prognostic risk model. According to K-M and ROC curve analyses, our eight-gene model might be useful in predicting ESCC prognostic outcomes. Based on the cell validation analysis, C2, CD14, RTP4, FCER3A, and SLC7A7 were expressed higher in KYSE410 and KYSE510 than in normal cells (HET-1A). Hence, ESCC patient prognostic outcomes can be assessed by our PRGs-based risk model. Further, these PRGs may also serve as therapeutic targets.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the factors affecting the objective response rate (ORR) after neoadjuvant therapy of taxol plus platinum (TP) regimen combined with programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors for esophageal cancer, and establish a predictive model for forecasting ORR. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, consecutive esophageal cancer patients who were treated in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from January 2020 to February 2022 were enrolled in this study as a training cohort, while patients who were treated in the Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Xi'an Jiaotong University from January 2020 to December 2021 were enrolled as a validation cohort. All patients were treated with resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer and received neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. The ORR was defined as the sum of complete pathological response, major pathological response and partial pathological response. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the factors that might be related to the ORR of the patients after neoadjuvant therapy. The nomogram based on the result of regression analysis was established and verified to predict the ORR. In this study, 42 patients were included as training cohort and 53 patients were included as validation cohort. Chi-square analysis showed that neutrophil, platelet, platelet-to-lymphocytes ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), D-dimer and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) between ORR group and non-ORR group were significantly different. Logistic regression analysis showed that aspartate aminotransferase (AST), D-dimer and CEA were independent predictors of ORR after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Finally, a nomogram was established based on AST, D-dimer and CEA. Internal validation and external validation revealed that the nomogram had a good ability to predict ORR after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. In conclusion, AST, D-dimer and CEA were the independent predictors of ORR after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. The nomogram based on these three indicators showed a good predictive ability.

The application of immunotherapy for cancer treatment is rapidly becoming more widespread. Immunotherapeutic agents are frequently combined with various types of treatments to obtain a more durable antitumor clinical response in patients who have developed resistance to monotherapy. Chemotherapeutic drugs that induce DNA damage and trigger DNA damage response (DDR) frequently induce an increase in the expression of the programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) that can be employed by cancer cells to avoid immune surveillance. PD-L1 exposed on cancer cells can in turn be targeted to re-establish the immune-reactive tumor microenvironment, which ultimately increases the tumor's susceptibility to combined therapies. Here we review the recent advances in how the DDR regulates PD-L1 expression and point out the effect of etoposide, irinotecan, and platinum compounds on the anti-tumor immune response.

Neoadjuvant strategies with multimodal therapy including chemotherapy and radiation are the standard of care in locally advanced esophageal cancer. The role of immunotherapy in the perioperative management of esophageal cancer is expanding, and adjuvant nivolumab for patients with residual disease following trimodality therapy has been shown to improve disease-free survival. Applications of checkpoint blockade and positron emission tomography (PET)-directed therapy in the neoadjuvant setting are under investigation in several clinical trials. We review the perioperative management of locally advanced esophageal cancer and recent evidence exploring the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors and PET in guiding neoadjuvant management.

Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide, especially in China. Despite therapeutic advances, the 5-year survival rate of EC is still dismal. For patients with resectable disease, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in combination with esophagectomy is the mainstay of treatment. However, the pathological complete response (pCR) rate to nCRT of 29.2% to 43.2% is not satisfactory, and approximately half of the patients will develop either a locoregional recurrence or distant metastasis. It is, therefore, necessary to explore novel and effective treatment strategies to improve the clinical efficacy of treatment. Immunotherapy utilizing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has significantly changed the treatment paradigm for a wide variety of advanced cancers, including EC. More recently, increasing clinical evidence has demonstrated that neoadjuvant immunotherapy can potentially improve the survival of patients with resectable cancers. Furthermore, accumulating findings support the idea that chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy can activate the immune system through a variety of mechanisms, so a combination of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy with immunotherapy can have a synergistic antitumor effect. Therefore, it is reasonable to evaluate the role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for patients with surgically resectable EC. In this review, we discuss the rationale for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with EC, summarize the current results of utilizing this strategy, review the planned and ongoing studies, and highlight the challenges and future research needs.

Currently, the role of immunotherapy in neoadjuvant setting for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is gradually attracting attention. Few studies compared the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). Our study aimed to compare treatment response and postoperative complications after NICT followed by surgery with that after conventional NCRT in patients with locally advanced ESCC.

Of 468 patients with locally advanced ESCC, 154 received conventional NCRT, whereas 314 received NICT. Treatment response, postoperative complications and mortality between two groups were compared. Pathological response of primary tumor was evaluated using the Mandard tumor regression grade (TRG) scoring system. Pathological complete response (pCR) of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) was defined as no viable tumor cell within all resected metastatic LNs. According to regression directionality, tumor regression pattern was summarized into four categories: type I, regression toward the lumen; type II, regression toward the invasive front; type III, concentric regression; and type IV, scattered regression. Inverse probability propensity score weighting was performed to minimize the influence of confounding factors.

After adjusting for baseline characteristics, the R0 resection rates (90.9% vs. 89.0%, P=0.302) and pCR (ypT0N0) rates (29.8% vs. 34.0%, P=0.167) were comparable between two groups. Patients receiving NCRT showed lower TRG score (P<0.001) and higher major pathological response (MPR) rate (64.7% vs. 53.6%, P=0.001) compared to those receiving NICT. However, NICT brought a higher pCR rate of metastatic LNs than conventional NCRT (53.9% vs. 37.1%, P<0.001). The rates of type I/II/III/IV regression patterns were 44.6%, 6.8%, 11.4% and 37.1% in the NICT group, 16.9%, 8.2%, 18.3% and 56.6% in the NCRT group, indicating a significant difference (P<0.001). Moreover, there were no significant differences in the incidence of total postoperative complications (35.8% vs. 39.9%, P=0.189) and 30-d mortality (0.0% vs. 1.1%, P=0.062).

For patients with locally advanced ESCC, NICT showed a R0 resection rate and pCR (ypT0N0) rate comparable to conventional NCRT, without increased incidence of postoperative complications and mortality. Notablely, NICT followed by surgery might bring a promising treatment response of metastatic LNs.