1
|
Biswas S, Afrose S, Mita MA, Hasan MR, Shimu MSS, Zaman S, Saleh MA. Next-Generation Sequencing: An Advanced Diagnostic Tool for Detection of Pancreatic Disease/Disorder. JGH Open 2024; 8:e70061. [PMID: 39605899 PMCID: PMC11599877 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.70061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2024] [Revised: 11/05/2024] [Accepted: 11/11/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024]
Abstract
The pancreas is involved in digestion and glucose regulation in the human body. Given the recognized link between chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer, addressing pancreatic disorders and pancreatic cancer is particularly challenging. This review aims to highlight the limitations of traditional methods in diagnosing pancreatic disorders and cancer and explore several next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches as a promising alternative. There are distinct clinical symptoms that are shared by a number of clinical phenotypes of pancreatic illness induced by particular genetic mutations. Traditional diagnostic methods encompass computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, contrast-enhanced Doppler ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, transabdominal ultrasound, laparoscopy, and positron emission tomography have a prognostic ability of only 5% or less and a 5-year survival rate. Genetic sequencing can be employed as an alternative to conventional diagnostic techniques. Sanger sequencing and NGS are currently largely operated genome analysis, with no exception for pancreatic disease diagnosis. The NGS methods can sequence millions to billions of short DNA fragments, enabling enormous sample screening in a short amount of time with low-abundance detection, like in 0.1%-1% mutation prevalence declining approximate cost. Whole-genome sequencing, whole-exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and single-cell NGS are a few NGS methods utilized to diagnose pancreatic disease. For both research and clinical applications, the NGS techniques can provide a precise diagnosis of pancreatic disorders in a short amount of time at a reasonable expenditure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suvro Biswas
- Miocrobiology Laboratory, Department of Genetic Engineering and BiotechnologyUniversity of RajshahiBangladesh
| | - Shamima Afrose
- Department of Genetic Engineering and BiotechnologyUniversity of RajshahiRajshahiBangladesh
| | - Mohasana Akter Mita
- Department of Genetic Engineering and BiotechnologyUniversity of RajshahiRajshahiBangladesh
| | - Md. Robiul Hasan
- Department of Genetic Engineering and BiotechnologyUniversity of RajshahiRajshahiBangladesh
| | | | - Shahriar Zaman
- Miocrobiology Laboratory, Department of Genetic Engineering and BiotechnologyUniversity of RajshahiBangladesh
| | - Md. Abu Saleh
- Miocrobiology Laboratory, Department of Genetic Engineering and BiotechnologyUniversity of RajshahiBangladesh
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Decker JA, Becker J, Härting M, Jehs B, Risch F, Canalini L, Wollny C, Scheurig-Muenkler C, Kroencke T, Schwarz F, Bette S. Optimal conspicuity of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in virtual monochromatic imaging reconstructions on a photon-counting detector CT: comparison to conventional MDCT. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:103-116. [PMID: 37796327 PMCID: PMC10789688 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-04042-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the conspicuity of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) on a novel photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) in comparison to energy-integrating CT (EID-CT). METHODS Inclusion criteria comprised initial diagnosis of PDAC (reference standard: histopathological analysis) and standardized contrast-enhanced CT imaging either on an EID-CT or a PCD-CT. Patients were excluded due to different histopathological diagnosis or missing tumor delineation on CT. On the PCD-CT, 40-190 keV VMI reconstructions were generated. Image noise, tumor-to-pancreas ratio (TPR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were analyzed by ROI-based measurements in arterial and portal venous contrast phase. Two board-certified radiologist evaluated image quality and tumor delineation at both, EID-CT and PCD-CT (40 and 70 keV). RESULTS Thirty-eight patients (mean age 70.4 years ± 10.3 [range 45-91], 27 males; PCD-CT: n=19, EID-CT: n=19) were retrospectively included. On the PCD-CT, tumor conspicuity (reflected by low TPR and high CNR) was significantly improved at low-energy VMI series (≤ 70 keV compared to > 70 keV), both in arterial and in portal venous contrast phase (P < 0.001), reaching the maximum at 40 keV. Comparison between PCD-CT and EID-CT showed significantly higher CNR on the PCD-CT in portal venous contrast phase at < 70 keV (P < 0.016). On the PCD-CT, tumor conspicuity was improved in portal venous contrast phase compared to arterial contrast phase especially at the lower end of the VMI spectrum (≤ 70 keV). Qualitative analysis revealed that tumor delineation is improved in 40 keV reconstructions compared to 70 keV reconstructions on a PCD-CT. CONCLUSION PCD-CT VMI reconstructions (≤ 70 keV) showed significantly improved conspicuity of PDAC in quantitative and qualitative analysis in both, arterial and portal venous contrast phase, compared to EID-CT, which may be important for early detection of tumor tissue in clinical routine. Tumor delineation was superior in portal venous contrast phase compared to arterial contrast phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josua A Decker
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Judith Becker
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Mark Härting
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Bertram Jehs
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Franka Risch
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Luca Canalini
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Claudia Wollny
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Christian Scheurig-Muenkler
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Kroencke
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
- Centre for Advanced Analytics and Predictive Sciences (CAAPS), University of Augsburg, Universitätsstr. 2, 86159, Augsburg, Germany.
| | - Florian Schwarz
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
- Medical Faculty, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Bavariaring 19, 80336, Munich, Germany
- Institute for Radiology, DONAUISAR Hospital Deggendorf-Dingolfing-Landau, Perlasberger Str. 41, 94469, Deggendorf, Germany
| | - Stefanie Bette
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chu LC, Ahmed T, Blanco A, Javed A, Weisberg EM, Kawamoto S, Hruban RH, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Fishman EK. Radiologists' Expectations of Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Cancer Imaging: How Good Is Good Enough? J Comput Assist Tomogr 2023; 47:845-849. [PMID: 37948357 PMCID: PMC10823576 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Existing (artificial intelligence [AI]) tools in radiology are modeled without necessarily considering the expectations and experience of the end user-the radiologist. The literature is scarce on the tangible parameters that AI capabilities need to meet for radiologists to consider them useful tools. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to explore radiologists' attitudes toward AI tools in pancreatic cancer imaging and to quantitatively assess their expectations of these tools. METHODS A link to the survey was posted on the www.ctisus.com website, advertised in the www.ctisus.com email newsletter, and publicized on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter accounts. This survey asked participants about their demographics, practice, and current attitudes toward AI. They were also asked about their expectations of what constitutes a clinically useful AI tool. The survey consisted of 17 questions, which included 9 multiple choice questions, 2 Likert scale questions, 4 binary (yes/no) questions, 1 rank order question, and 1 free text question. RESULTS A total of 161 respondents completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 46.3% of the total 348 clicks on the survey link. The minimum acceptable sensitivity of an AI program for the detection of pancreatic cancer chosen by most respondents was either 90% or 95% at a specificity of 95%. The minimum size of pancreatic cancer that most respondents would find an AI useful at detecting was 5 mm. Respondents preferred AI tools that demonstrated greater sensitivity over those with greater specificity. Over half of respondents anticipated incorporating AI tools into their clinical practice within the next 5 years. CONCLUSION Radiologists are open to the idea of integrating AI-based tools and have high expectations regarding the performance of these tools. Consideration of radiologists' input is important to contextualize expectations and optimize clinical adoption of existing and future AI tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda C. Chu
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Taha Ahmed
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Alejandra Blanco
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ammar Javed
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Edmund M. Weisberg
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Satomi Kawamoto
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ralph H. Hruban
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kenneth W. Kinzler
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Bert Vogelstein
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Elliot K Fishman
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Harindranath S, Sundaram S. Approach to Pancreatic Head Mass in the Background of Chronic Pancreatitis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:1797. [PMID: 37238280 PMCID: PMC10217770 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13101797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a known risk factor for pancreatic cancer. CP may present with an inflammatory mass, and differentiation from pancreatic cancer is often difficult. Clinical suspicion of malignancy dictates a need for further evaluation for underlying pancreatic cancer. Imaging modalities remain the mainstay of evaluation for a mass in background CP; however, they have their shortcomings. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become the go-to investigation. Adjunct modalities such as contrast-harmonic EUS and EUS elastography, as well as EUS-guided sampling using newer-generation needles are useful in differentiating inflammatory from malignant masses in the pancreas. Paraduodenal pancreatitis and autoimmune pancreatitis often masquerade as pancreatic cancer. In this narrative review, we discuss the various modalities used to differentiate inflammatory from malignant masses of the pancreas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sidharth Harindranath
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Sridhar Sundaram
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Harindranath S, Sundaram S. Approach to Pancreatic Head Mass in the Background of Chronic Pancreatitis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:1797. [DOI: https:/doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2025] Open
Abstract
Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a known risk factor for pancreatic cancer. CP may present with an inflammatory mass, and differentiation from pancreatic cancer is often difficult. Clinical suspicion of malignancy dictates a need for further evaluation for underlying pancreatic cancer. Imaging modalities remain the mainstay of evaluation for a mass in background CP; however, they have their shortcomings. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become the go-to investigation. Adjunct modalities such as contrast-harmonic EUS and EUS elastography, as well as EUS-guided sampling using newer-generation needles are useful in differentiating inflammatory from malignant masses in the pancreas. Paraduodenal pancreatitis and autoimmune pancreatitis often masquerade as pancreatic cancer. In this narrative review, we discuss the various modalities used to differentiate inflammatory from malignant masses of the pancreas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sidharth Harindranath
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Sridhar Sundaram
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fiore M, Coppola A, Petrianni GM, Trecca P, D’Ercole G, Cimini P, Ippolito E, Caputo D, Beomonte Zobel B, Coppola R, Ramella S. Advances in pre-treatment evaluation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a narrative review. J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 14:1114-1130. [PMID: 37201095 PMCID: PMC10186502 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-22-1034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Despite advances in the multidisciplinary management of pancreatic cancer, overall prognosis remains poor, due to early progression of the disease. There is a need to also take action in staging, to make it increasingly accurate and complete, to define the setting of the therapeutic strategy. This review was planned to update the current status of pre-treatment evaluation for pancreatic cancer. METHODS We conducted an extensive review, including relevant articles dealing with traditional imaging, functional imaging and minimally invasive surgical procedures before treatment for pancreatic cancer. We searched articles written in English only. Data in the PubMed database, published in the period between January 2000 and January 2022, were retrieved. Prospective observational studies, retrospective analyses and meta-analyses were reviewed and analysed. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS Each imaging modality (endoscopic ultrasonography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, computed tomography, positron emission tomography/computed tomography, staging laparoscopy) has its own diagnostic advantages and limitations. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for each image set are reported. Data that support the increasing role of neoadjuvant therapy (radiotherapy and chemotherapy) and the meaning of a patient-tailored treatment selection, based on tumour staging, are also discussed. CONCLUSIONS A multimodal pre-treatment workup should be searched as it improves staging accuracy, orienting patients with resectable tumors towards surgery, optimizing patient selection with locally advanced tumors to neoadjuvant or definite therapy and avoiding surgical resection or curative radiotherapy in those with metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Fiore
- Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- Operative Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Gian Marco Petrianni
- Operative Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Pasquale Trecca
- Operative Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele D’Ercole
- Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Cimini
- Operative Research Unit of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Edy Ippolito
- Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- Operative Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Damiano Caputo
- Department of Surgery and Research Unit of General Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- Operative Research Unit of General Surgery Unit Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Beomonte Zobel
- Operative Research Unit of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Radiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Coppola
- Department of Surgery and Research Unit of General Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- Operative Research Unit of General Surgery Unit Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Ramella
- Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- Operative Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen X, Liu F, Xue Q, Weng X, Xu F. Metastatic pancreatic cancer: Mechanisms and detection (Review). Oncol Rep 2021; 46:231. [PMID: 34498718 PMCID: PMC8444192 DOI: 10.3892/or.2021.8182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a lethal malignancy. Its prevalence rate remains low but continues to grow each year. Among all stages of PC, metastatic PC is defined as late-stage (stage IV) PC and has an even higher fatality rate. Patients with PC do not have any specific clinical manifestations. Most cases are inoperable at the time-point of diagnosis. Prognosis is also poor even with curative-intent surgery. Complications during surgery, postoperative pancreatic fistula and recurrence with metastatic foci make the management of metastatic PC difficult. While extensive efforts were made to improve survival outcomes, further elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of metastasis poses a formidable challenge. The present review provided an overview of the mechanisms of metastatic PC, summarizing currently known signaling pathways (e.g. epithelial-mesenchymal transition, NF-κB and KRAS), imaging that may be utilized for early detection and biomarkers (e.g. carbohydrate antigen 19-9, prostate cancer-associated transcript-1, F-box/LRR-repeat protein 7 and tumor stroma), giving insight into promising therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangling Chen
- Department of Public Health, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, P.R. China
| | - Fangfang Liu
- Department of Art, Art College, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China
| | - Qingping Xue
- Department of Public Health, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, P.R. China
| | - Xiechuan Weng
- Department of Neuroscience, Beijing Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing 100850, P.R. China
| | - Fan Xu
- Department of Public Health, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cheng H, Luo G, Jin K, Xiao Z, Qian Y, Gong Y, Yu X, Liu C. Predictive Values of Preoperative Markers for Resectable Pancreatic Body and Tail Cancer Determined by MDCT to Detect Occult Metastases. World J Surg 2021; 45:2185-2190. [PMID: 33774691 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06047-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the clinical value of preoperative markers in predicting occult metastases in resectable pancreatic body and tail cancer judged by a recent multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scan of the abdomen. METHODS The data from a retrospective collected database from 2010 to 2019 with 699 patients who had MDCT scan predicted resectable mass in pancreatic body and tail and were pathological confirmed as adenocarcinoma after surgery. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted for serum CA19-9, CA125, CEA and tumor size measured by MDCT. The optimal cut-off point-related sensitivity and specificity were calculated, respectively. RESULTS Occult metastases were found in 73 (73/699, 10.4%) pancreatic body and tail cancer patients underwent exploration. The area under curve (AUC) for CA19-9, CA125, CEA and tumor size were 0.624, 0.733, 0.561 and 0.697, respectively. The optimal cut-off for CA19-9, CA125 and tumor size is 226 U/ml, 22.1 U/ml and 3.3 cm, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of CA19-9 for predicting occult metastases were 67.1% and 60.4%, 72.6% and 64.7% for CA125, 80.8% and 51.4% for tumor size. CONCLUSION CA125 is superior to CA19-9 and tumor size for predicting occulting metastases in MDCT scan suggested resectable pancreatic body and tail cancer. The high level of CA125 (≥ 22.1 U/ml) is regarded as high risk for occulting metastases, and laparoscopy should be applied for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- He Cheng
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 DongAn Road, 200032, Xuhui, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
| | - Guopei Luo
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 DongAn Road, 200032, Xuhui, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
| | - Kaizhou Jin
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 DongAn Road, 200032, Xuhui, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiwen Xiao
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 DongAn Road, 200032, Xuhui, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
| | - Yunzhen Qian
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 DongAn Road, 200032, Xuhui, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
| | - Yitao Gong
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 DongAn Road, 200032, Xuhui, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
| | - Xianjun Yu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 DongAn Road, 200032, Xuhui, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China.
| | - Chen Liu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 DongAn Road, 200032, Xuhui, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zeeshan MS, Ramzan Z. Current controversies and advances in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:472-494. [PMID: 34163568 PMCID: PMC8204360 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i6.472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a lethal disease with a mortality rate that has not significantly improved over decades. This is likely due to several challenges unique to pancreatic cancer. Most patients with pancreatic cancer are diagnosed at a late stage of disease due to the lack of specific symptoms prompting an early investigation. A small subset of patients who are diagnosed at an early stage have a better chance at survival with curative surgical resection, but most patients still succumb to the disease in a few years. The dismal overall prognosis is due to suspected micro-metastasis at an early stage. Due to this reason, there is a recent interest in treating all patients with pancreatic cancers with systemic therapy upfront (including the ones that are surgically resectable). This approach is still not the standard of care due to the lack of robust prospective data available. Recent advancements in treatment regimens of chemotherapy, radiation and immunotherapy have improved the overall short-term survival but the long-term survival still remains poor. Novel approaches in diagnosis and treatment have shown promise in clinical studies but long-term clinical data is lacking. The following manuscript presents an overview of the epidemiology, diagnosis, staging, recent advances, novel approaches and controversies in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Shehroz Zeeshan
- Gastrointestinal Section, Department of Medicine, Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital, Fort Worth, TX 76104, United States
| | - Zeeshan Ramzan
- Gastrointestinal Section, Department of Medicine, Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital, Fort Worth, TX 76104, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gallo M, Adinolfi V, Morviducci L, Acquati S, Tuveri E, Ferrari P, Zatelli MC, Faggiano A, Argentiero A, Natalicchio A, D'Oronzo S, Danesi R, Gori S, Russo A, Montagnani M, Beretta GD, Di Bartolo P, Silvestris N, Giorgino F. Early prediction of pancreatic cancer from new-onset diabetes: an Associazione Italiana Oncologia Medica (AIOM)/Associazione Medici Diabetologi (AMD)/Società Italiana Endocrinologia (SIE)/Società Italiana Farmacologia (SIF) multidisciplinary consensus position paper. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100155. [PMID: 34020401 PMCID: PMC8144346 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a common cause of cancer-related death, due to difficulties in detecting early-stage disease, to its aggressive behaviour, and to poor response to systemic therapy. Therefore, developing strategies for early diagnosis of resectable PC is critical for improving survival. Diabetes mellitus is another major public health problem worldwide. Furthermore, diabetes can represent both a risk factor and a consequence of PC: nowadays, the relationship between these two diseases is considered a high priority for research. New-onset diabetes can be an early manifestation of PC, especially in a thin adult without a family history of diabetes. However, even if targeted screening for patients at higher risk of PC could be a promising approach, this is not recommended in asymptomatic adults with new-onset diabetes, due to the much higher incidence of hyperglycaemia than PC and to the lack of a safe and affordable PC screening test. Prompted by a well-established and productive multidisciplinary cooperation, the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), the Italian Medical Diabetologists Association (AMD), the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE), and the Italian Society of Pharmacology (SIF) here review available evidence on the mechanisms linking diabetes and PC, addressing the feasibility of screening for early PC in patients with diabetes, and sharing a set of update statements with the aim of providing a state-of-the-art overview and a decision aid tool for daily clinical practice.
The incidence of PC is increasing and its prognosis is very poor; therefore, early detection is fundamental. New-onset diabetes may be an early manifestation of PC, often disappearing after its resection. Screening for PC is not currently recommended among people with new-onset diabetes, due to its high incidence. Thin subjects >50 years old at the time of diabetes onset, with sudden weight loss and severe hyperglycaemia are at higher risk. Currently some clinical models are promising for stratifying cancer risk in people with new-onset diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Gallo
- Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases Unit of AO SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo of Alessandria, Alessandria, Italy.
| | - V Adinolfi
- Endocrinology and Diabetology Unit, ASL Verbano Cusio Ossola, Domodossola, Italy
| | - L Morviducci
- Diabetology and Nutrition Unit, Department of Medical Specialities, ASL Roma 1 - S. Spirito Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - S Acquati
- Endocrinology Unit, Ospedale Pierantoni-Morgagni, Forlì, Italy
| | - E Tuveri
- Diabetology, Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases Service, ATS Sardegna - ASSL Carbonia-Iglesias, Italy
| | - P Ferrari
- Palliative Care Unit, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SPA SB, IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - M C Zatelli
- Section of Endocrinology & Internal Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - A Faggiano
- Endocrinology Unit, Department of Clinical & Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - A Argentiero
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - A Natalicchio
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Section of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology, Andrology and Metabolic Diseases, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - S D'Oronzo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - R Danesi
- Unit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - S Gori
- Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Don Calabria-Sacro Cuore di Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - A Russo
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - M Montagnani
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - G D Beretta
- Medical Oncology Department, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - P Di Bartolo
- Ravenna Diabetes Center, Romagna Diabetes Managed Clinical Network - Romagna Local Health Authority, Ravenna, Italy
| | - N Silvestris
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - F Giorgino
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Section of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology, Andrology and Metabolic Diseases, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vitello DJ, Bentrem DJ. A review of response in neoadjuvant therapy for exocrine pancreatic cancer. J Surg Oncol 2021; 123:1449-1459. [PMID: 33831249 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Despite overall advances in cancer therapy, patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma continue to have a poor prognosis. While adjuvant therapy is still considered standard, there is mounting evidence that neoadjuvant therapy confers similar benefits in patients with locally advanced disease. The primary measures of response are radiographic, biochemical, margin status, and pathologic. Given overall low response rates and the need for new treatment strategies, standard metrics remain important to the investigation of new systemic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominic J Vitello
- Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - David J Bentrem
- Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Barakat MT, Banerjee S. Incidental biliary dilation in the era of the opiate epidemic: High prevalence of biliary dilation in opiate users evaluated in the Emergency Department. World J Hepatol 2020; 12:1289-1298. [PMID: 33442455 PMCID: PMC7772725 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i12.1289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biliary dilation is frequently related to obstruction; however, non-obstructive factors such as age and previous cholecystectomy have also been reported. In the past two decades there has been a dramatic increase in opiate use/dependence and utilization of cross-sectional abdominal imaging, with increased detection of biliary dilation, particularly in patients who use opiates.
AIM To evaluate associations between opiate use, age, cholecystectomy status, ethnicity, gender, and body mass index utilizing our institution’s integrated informatics platform.
METHODS One thousand six hundred and eighty-five patients (20% sample) presenting to our Emergency Department for all causes over a 5-year period (2011-2016) who had undergone cross-sectional abdominal imaging and had normal total bilirubin were included and analyzed.
RESULTS Common bile duct (CBD) diameter was significantly higher in opiate users compared to non-opiate users (8.67 mm vs 7.24 mm, P < 0.001) and in patients with a history of cholecystectomy compared to those with an intact gallbladder (8.98 vs 6.72, P < 0.001). For patients with an intact gallbladder who did not use opiates (n = 432), increasing age did not predict CBD diameter (r2 = 0.159, P = 0.873). Height weakly predicted CBD diameter (r2 = 0.561, P = 0.018), but weight, body mass index, ethnicity and gender did not.
CONCLUSION Opiate use and a history of cholecystectomy are associated with CBD dilation in the absence of an obstructive process. Age alone is not associated with increased CBD diameter. These findings suggest that factors such as opiate use and history of cholecystectomy may underlie the previously-reported association of advancing age with increased CBD diameter. Further prospective study is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monique T Barakat
- Divisions of Adult and Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA 94305, United States
| | - Subhas Banerjee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA 94304, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Non-coding RNA biomarkers in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Semin Cancer Biol 2020; 75:153-168. [PMID: 33049362 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Revised: 09/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal malignancies, which is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage. The late disease diagnosis, the limited availability of effective therapeutic interventions and lack of robust diagnostic biomarkers, are some of the primary reasons for the dismal 5-year survival rates (∼8%) in patients with PDAC. The pancreatic cancer develops through accumulation of a series of genomic and epigenomic alterations which lead to the transformation of normal pancreatic epithelium into an invasive carcinoma - a process that can take up to 15-20 years to develop, from the occurrence of first initiating mutational event. These facts highlight a unique window of opportunity for the earlier detection of PDAC, which could allow timely disease interception and improvement in the overall survival outcomes in patients suffering from this fatal malignancy. Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) have been recognized to play a central role in PDAC pathogenesis and are emerging as attractive candidates for biomarker development in various cancers, including PDAC. More specifically, the ncRNAs play a pivotal role in PDAC biology as they affect tumor growth, migration, and invasion by regulating cellular processes including cell cycle, apoptosis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. In this review, we focus on three types of well-established ncRNAs - microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circular RNAs (circRNAs) - and discuss their potential as diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarkers in PDAC.
Collapse
|
14
|
Haj-Mirzaian A, Kawamoto S, Zaheer A, Hruban RH, Fishman EK, Chu LC. Pitfalls in the MDCT of pancreatic cancer: strategies for minimizing errors. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:457-478. [PMID: 31897686 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02390-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is a widely used cross-sectional imaging modality for initial evaluation of patients with suspected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, diagnosis of PDAC can be challenging due to numerous pitfalls associated with image acquisition and interpretation, including technical factors, imaging features, and cognitive errors. Accurate diagnosis requires familiarity with these pitfalls, as these can be minimized using systematic strategies. Suboptimal acquisition protocols and other technical errors such as motion artifacts and incomplete anatomical coverage increase the risk of misdiagnosis. Interpretation of images can be challenging due to intrinsic tumor features (including small and isoenhancing masses, exophytic masses, subtle pancreatic duct irregularities, and diffuse tumor infiltration), presence of coexisting pathology (including chronic pancreatitis and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm), mimickers of PDAC (including focal fatty infiltration and focal pancreatitis), distracting findings, and satisfaction of search. Awareness of pitfalls associated with the diagnosis of PDAC along with the strategies to avoid them will help radiologists to minimize technical and interpretation errors. Cognizance and mitigation of these errors can lead to earlier PDAC diagnosis and ultimately improve patient prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arya Haj-Mirzaian
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Satomi Kawamoto
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Atif Zaheer
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elliot K Fishman
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Linda C Chu
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Korn RL, Rahmanuddin S, Borazanci E. Use of Precision Imaging in the Evaluation of Pancreas Cancer. Cancer Treat Res 2019; 178:209-236. [PMID: 31209847 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-16391-4_8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Pancreas cancer is an aggressive and fatal disease that will become one of the leading causes of cancer mortality by 2030. An all-out effort is underway to better understand the basic biologic mechanisms of this disease ranging from early development to metastatic disease. In order to change the course of this disease, diagnostic radiology imaging may play a vital role in providing a precise, noninvasive method for early diagnosis and assessment of treatment response. Recent progress in combining medical imaging, advanced image analysis and artificial intelligence, termed radiomics, can offer an innovate approach in detecting the earliest changes of tumor development as well as a rapid method for the detection of response. In this chapter, we introduce the principles of radiomics and demonstrate how it can provide additional information into tumor biology, early detection, and response assessments advancing the goals of precision imaging to deliver the right treatment to the right person at the right time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald L Korn
- Virginia G Piper Cancer Center at HonorHealth, Scottsdale, AZ, USA. .,Translational Genomics Research Institute, An Affiliate of City of Hope, Phoenix, AZ, USA. .,Imaging Endpoints Core Lab, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
| | | | - Erkut Borazanci
- Virginia G Piper Cancer Center at HonorHealth, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.,Translational Genomics Research Institute, An Affiliate of City of Hope, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Singhi AD, Koay EJ, Chari ST, Maitra A. Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges. Gastroenterology 2019; 156:2024-2040. [PMID: 30721664 PMCID: PMC6486851 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 487] [Impact Index Per Article: 81.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Revised: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Most patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) present with symptomatic, surgically unresectable disease. Although the goal of early detection of PDAC is laudable and likely to result in significant improvement in overall survival, the relatively low prevalence of PDAC renders general population screening infeasible. The challenges of early detection include identification of at-risk individuals in the general population who would benefit from longitudinal surveillance programs and appropriate biomarker and imaging-based modalities used for PDAC surveillance in such cohorts. In recent years, various subgroups at higher-than-average risk for PDAC have been identified, including those with familial risk due to germline mutations, a history of pancreatitis, patients with mucinous pancreatic cysts, and elderly patients with new-onset diabetes. The last 2 categories are discussed at length in terms of the opportunities and challenges they present for PDAC early detection. We also discuss current and emerging imaging modalities that are critical to identifying early, potentially curable PDAC in high-risk cohorts on surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Sheikh Ahmed Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Suresh T Chari
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Anirban Maitra
- Sheikh Ahmed Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Utility of CT Radiomics Features in Differentiation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma From Normal Pancreatic Tissue. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 213:349-357. [PMID: 31012758 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.18.20901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to determine the utility of radiomics features in differentiating CT cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from normal pancreas. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this retrospective case-control study, 190 patients with PDAC (97 men, 93 women; mean age ± SD, 66 ± 9 years) from 2012 to 2017 and 190 healthy potential renal donors (96 men, 94 women; mean age ± SD, 52 ± 8 years) without known pancreatic disease from 2005 to 2009 were identified from radiology and pathology databases. The 3D volume of the pancreas was manually segmented from the preoperative CT scans by four trained researchers and verified by three abdominal radiologists. Four hundred seventy-eight radiomics features were extracted to express the phenotype of the pancreas. Forty features were selected for analysis because of redundancy of computed features. The dataset was divided into 255 training cases (125 normal control cases and 130 PDAC cases) and 125 validation cases (65 normal control cases and 60 PDAC cases). A random forest classifier was used for binary classification of PDAC versus normal pancreas of control cases. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. RESULTS. Mean tumor size was 4.1 ± 1.7 (SD) cm. The overall accuracy of the random forest binary classification was 99.2% (124/125), and AUC was 99.9%. All PDAC cases (60/60) were correctly classified. One case from a renal donor was misclassified as PDAC (1/65). The sensitivity was 100%, and specificity was 98.5%. CONCLUSION. Radiomics features extracted from whole pancreas can be used to differentiate between CT cases from patients with PDAC and healthy control subjects with normal pancreas.
Collapse
|
18
|
|
19
|
Cinematic rendering of pancreatic neoplasms: preliminary observations and opportunities. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43:3009-3015. [PMID: 29550959 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1559-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is the third most common cause of cancer death and CT is the most commonly used modality for the initial evaluation of suspected pancreatic cancer. Post-processing of CT data into 2D multiplanar and 3D reconstructions has been shown to improve tumor visualization and assessment of tumor resectability compared to axial slices, and is considered the standard of care. Cinematic rendering is a new 3D-rendering technique that produces photorealistic images, and it has the potential to more accurately depict anatomic detail compared to traditional 3D reconstruction techniques. The purpose of this article is to describe the potential application of CR to imaging of pancreatic neoplasms. CR has the potential to improve visualization of subtle pancreatic neoplasms, differentiation of solid and cystic pancreatic neoplasms, assessment of local tumor extension and vascular invasion, and visualization of metastatic disease.
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Computed tomography is the first-line imaging modality for suspected pancreatic cancer. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is a second-line modality for suspected pancreatic cancer and is usually reserved for equivocal cases. Both computed tomography and MR are highly sensitive in the detection of pancreatic cancer, with up to 96% and 93.5% sensitivity, respectively. Computed tomography is superior to MR in the assessment of tumor resectability, with accuracy rates of up to 86.8% and 78.9%, respectively. Close attention to secondary signs of pancreatic cancer, such as pancreatic duct dilatation, abrupt pancreatic duct caliber change, and parenchymal atrophy, are critical in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Emerging techniques such as radiomics and molecular imaging have the potential of identifying malignant precursors and lead to earlier disease diagnosis. The results of these promising techniques need to be validated in larger clinical studies.
Collapse
|
21
|
Zhang L, Sanagapalli S, Stoita A. Challenges in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24:2047-2060. [PMID: 29785074 PMCID: PMC5960811 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i19.2047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 362] [Impact Index Per Article: 51.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Revised: 04/28/2018] [Accepted: 05/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is a growing source of cancer related death, yet has poor survival rates which have not improved in the last few decades. Its high mortality rate is attributed to pancreatic cancer biology, difficulty in early diagnosis and the lack of standardised international guidelines in assessing suspicious pancreatic masses. This review aims to provide an update in the current state of play in pancreatic cancer diagnosis and to evaluate the benefits and limitations of available diagnostic technology. The main modalities discussed are imaging with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopic ultrasound and positron emission tomography and tissue acquisition with fine needle aspiration. We also review the improvements in the techniques used for tissue acquisition and the opportunity for personalised cancer medicine. Screening of high risk individuals, promising biomarkers and common mimickers of pancreatic cancer are also explored, as well as suggestions for future research directions to allow for earlier detection of pancreatic cancer. Timely and accurate diagnosis of pancreatic cancer can lead to improvements in the current poor outcome of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lulu Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Vincent’s Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst 2010, NSW, Australia
| | - Santosh Sanagapalli
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Vincent’s Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst 2010, NSW, Australia
| | - Alina Stoita
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Vincent’s Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst 2010, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Du T, Bill KA, Ford J, Barawi M, Hayward RD, Alame A, Berri RN. The diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer: A comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography with pancreas protocol. Am J Surg 2017; 215:472-475. [PMID: 29174773 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2017] [Revised: 11/14/2017] [Accepted: 11/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in United States. We compared Computed Tomography (CT) with pancreas protocol and Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) in terms of mass detection, mass size, vascular involvement and lymph node involvement. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 93 patients. Concordance between CT and EUS, and accuracy of CT and EUS were assessed using a retrospective chart review and statistical analysis. RESULTS CT and EUS agreed on mass detection in 88% of the cases and mass size in 67% of the cases. They agreed in 74% of cases about the presence or absence of vascular involvement and 82% in lymph node involvement. Cohen's kappa indicated that the concordance between two tests was moderately reliable. CONCLUSION CT and EUS agree moderately well in identifying characteristics of pancreatic masses, but discrepancies between the two modalities are common, particularly with respect to involvement of specific blood vessels and lymph nodes. Clinicians should use caution in relying on a single modality to make decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianli Du
- St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Detroit, MI, USA.
| | | | - Jennifer Ford
- St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Mohammed Barawi
- St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Richard D Hayward
- St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Amer Alame
- St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Richard N Berri
- St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Al-Hawary MM, Kaza RK, Francis IR. Optimal Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis and Staging of Periampullary Masses. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2016; 25:239-53. [PMID: 27013362 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2015.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Imaging plays a central role in the management of patients with suspected or known periampullary masses, including the initial diagnosis, staging, and follow-up to assess treatment response or recurrence. Use of appropriate imaging tools, application of optimal imaging protocols, and knowledge about imaging findings are essential for the diagnosis and accurate staging of these masses. Structured reporting of the imaging studies offers several advantages over freestyle dictations ensuring completeness of the relevant imaging findings, which would in turn help in deciding the best individual treatment strategy for each patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud M Al-Hawary
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, University of Michigan, Room B1 D502, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| | - Ravi K Kaza
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, University of Michigan, Room B1 D501, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Isaac R Francis
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, University of Michigan, Room B1 D540, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Avanesov M, Weinrich JM, Kraus T, Derlin T, Adam G, Yamamura J, Karul M. MDCT of acute pancreatitis: Intraindividual comparison of single-phase versus dual-phase MDCT for initial assessment of acute pancreatitis using different CT scoring systems. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85:2014-2022. [PMID: 27776654 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2016] [Revised: 09/06/2016] [Accepted: 09/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of the retrospective study was to evaluate the additional value of dual-phase multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) protocols over a single-phase protocol on initial MDCT in patients with acute pancreatitis using three CT-based pancreatitis severity scores with regard to radiation dose. METHODS In this retrospective, IRB approved study MDCT was performed in 102 consecutive patients (73 males; 55years, IQR48-64) with acute pancreatitis. Inclusion criteria were CT findings of interstitial edematous pancreatitis (IP) or necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) and a contrast-enhanced dual-phase (arterial phase and portal-venous phase) abdominal CT performed at ≥72h after onset of symptoms. The severity of pancreatic and extrapancreatic changes was independently assessed by 2 observers using 3 validated CT-based scoring systems (CTSI, mCTSI, EPIC). All scores were applied to arterial phase and portal venous phase scans and compared to score results of portal venous phase scans, assessed ≥14days after initial evaluation. For effective dose estimation, volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) were recorded in all examinations. RESULTS In neither of the CT severity scores a significant difference was observed after application of a dual-phase protocol compared with a single-phase protocol (IP: CTSI: 2.7 vs. 2.5, p=0.25; mCTSI: 4.0 vs. 4.0, p=0.10; EPIC: 2.0 vs. 2.0, p=0.41; NP: CTSI: 8.0 vs. 7.0, p=0.64; mCTSI: 8.0 vs. 8.0, p=0.10; EPIC: 3.0 vs. 3.0, p=0.06). The application of a single-phase CT protocol was associated with a median effective dose reduction of 36% (mean dose reduction 31%) compared to a dual-phase CT scan. CONCLUSIONS An initial dual-phase abdominal CT after ≥72h after onset of symptoms of acute pancreatitis was not superior to a single-phase protocol for evaluation of the severity of pancreatic and extrapancreatic changes. However, the effective radiation dose may be reduced by 36% using a single-phase protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxim Avanesov
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Julius M Weinrich
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Kraus
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Gerhard Adam
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jin Yamamura
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Murat Karul
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Marienkrankenhaus Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rossi MK, Gnanamony M, Gondi CS. The 'SPARC' of life: Analysis of the role of osteonectin/SPARC in pancreatic cancer (Review). Int J Oncol 2016; 48:1765-71. [PMID: 26983777 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2015] [Accepted: 01/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most clinically challenging cancers to manage. An estimated 48,960 people will be diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in 2015, of that population, 94% are projected to perish within 5 years. These dismal survival rates can be attributed, in part, to an advanced diagnosis occurring in 80% of cases. The heterogeneous and dynamic microenvironment of pancreatic cancer, and the lack of both specific risk factors and efficacious screening tools contribute to the challenge of diagnosing pancreatic cancer in its early stages. These clinical challenges have directed research into the unique characteristics that define PDAC. Recently, there has been an increased focus on the interaction of tumor cells with their microenvironment in the hope of identifying new therapeutic targets. One of the most promising avenues in this new vein of research is targeting protein communication between the cancer cells and the extracellular matrix. The secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) is one such extracellular matrix protein that has shown potential as a therapeutic target due to its influence on PDAC invasion and metastasis. In this review, we discuss the complex interaction of SPARC with PDAC cells and its potential to guide treatment and eventually improve the survival of patients diagnosed with this devastating disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica K Rossi
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL 61605, USA
| | - Manu Gnanamony
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL 61605, USA
| | - Christopher S Gondi
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL 61605, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Al-Hawary MM, Francis IR, Anderson MA. Pancreatic Solid and Cystic Neoplasms: Diagnostic Evaluation and Intervention. Radiol Clin North Am 2015; 53:1037-48. [PMID: 26321452 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2015.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
High-resolution imaging modalities, such as multi-detector computed tomography, MR imaging, and endoscopic ultrasound, are frequently used alone or in combination to characterize focal solid and cystic pancreatic neoplasms. Imaging in solid pancreatic neoplasms, typically adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors, is primarily used to detect and stage the extent of the tumor and to determine if complete surgical resection for cure is feasible. In cystic pancreatic masses, imaging aims to differentiate benign nonmucinous cystic lesions from potentially or frankly malignant mucin-producing cysts. Several noninvasive and invasive treatment options can be performed if surgical resection is not possible or contraindicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud M Al-Hawary
- Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Hospitals, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Room B1 D502, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| | - Isaac R Francis
- Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Hospitals, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Room B1 D540, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Michelle A Anderson
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Hospitals, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Jang SK, Kim JH, Joo I, Jeon JH, Shin KS, Han JK, Choi BI. Differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer from other solid tumours arising from the periampullary area on MDCT. Eur Radiol 2015; 25:2880-8. [PMID: 25916385 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3721-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2014] [Revised: 03/17/2015] [Accepted: 03/18/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate CT features and differential diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma compared to other solid tumours arising in the periampullary area. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred and ninety-five patients with pathologically proven, solid periampullary tumours, including pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 98), neuroendocrine tumours (n = 52), gastrointestinal stromal tumours (n = 31), and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (n = 14), underwent preoperative CT. Two radiologists reviewed CT features and rated the possibility of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. RESULTS Statistically common findings for pancreatic adenocarcinoma included: patient age >50 years; ill-defined margin; completely solid mass; homogeneous enhancement; hypoenhancement on arterial and venous phases; atrophy; and duct dilatation. Statistically common findings for GIST included: heterogeneous enhancement; hyperenhancement on arterial and venous phases; rim enhancement; and prominent feeding arteries. The hyperenhancement on arterial and venous phases is statistically common in NET, and heterogeneous enhancement, hypoenhancement on the arterial and venous phases are statistically common in SPN. Diagnostic performance of CT for differentiating pancreatic adenocarcinomas from other solid periampullary tumours was 0.962 and 0.977 with excellent interobserver agreement (κ = 0.824). CONCLUSION CT is useful not only for differentiating pancreatic adenocarcinoma form other solid tumours but also for differentiating between other solid tumours, including NET, SPN, and GIST, arising in the periampullary area. KEY POINTS • Periampullary tumours arise within 2 cm of major duodenal papilla. • Many mass-forming periampullary tumours can be completely removed by minimal surgery. • Accurate differentiation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma from other solid tumours is important. • CT is useful for differentiating pancreatic adenocarcinoma from other solid tumours. • CT is useful for characterization of periampullary tumours other than adenocarcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suk Ki Jang
- Departments of Radiology, Daejin Medical Center, Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital, 20, Seohyeon-ro 180beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seognam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 463-774, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rossi ML, Rehman AA, Gondi CS. Therapeutic options for the management of pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:11142-11159. [PMID: 25170201 PMCID: PMC4145755 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i32.11142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2013] [Revised: 01/11/2014] [Accepted: 05/29/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Since its initial characterization, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has remained one of the most devastating and difficult cancers to treat. Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of death in the United States, resulting in an estimated 38460 deaths annually. With few screening tools available to detect this disease at an early stage, 94% of patients will die within five years of diagnosis. Despite decades of research that have led to a better understanding of the molecular and cellular signaling pathways in pancreatic cancer cells, few effective therapies have been developed to target these pathways. Other treatment options have included more sophisticated pancreatic cancer surgeries and combination therapies. While outcomes have improved modestly for these patients, more effective treatments are desperately needed. One of the greatest challenges in the future of treating this malignancy will be to develop therapies that target the tumor microenvironment and surrounding pancreatic cancer stem cells in addition to pancreatic cancer cells. Recent advances in targeting pancreatic stellate cells and the stroma have encouraged researchers to shift their focus to the role of desmoplasia in pancreatic cancer pathobiology in the hopes of developing newer-generation therapies. By combining novel agents with current cytotoxic chemotherapies and radiation therapy and personalizing them to each patient based on specific biomarkers, the goal of prolonging a patient’s life could be achieved. Here we review the most effective therapies that have been used for the treatment of pancreatic cancer and discuss the future potential of therapeutic options.
Collapse
|
29
|
SHERIDAN MB, MANOHARAN P. Neoplasms of the pancreas. IMAGING 2013. [DOI: 10.1259/imaging/20369618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
30
|
Abdominal ultrasonography in detecting and surgical treatment of pancreatic carcinoma. POLISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY 2012; 84:285-92. [PMID: 22842740 DOI: 10.2478/v10035-012-0048-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
THE AIM OF THE STUDY was to asses the clinical value of percutaneous abdominal ultrasonography in diagnosis, staging and surgical treatment of patients with pancreatic carcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS Prospective clinical trial on diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous abdominal ultrasonography was conducted in 409 consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer which were operated on at the I Dept. of General Surgery in Cracow between 2000 and 2010. RESULTS Diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous abdominal ultrasonography in pancreatic cancer was 91,1%. The accuracy in detecting different stages of local advancement according to TNM classification was assessed respectively 92.3%-T1, 91.3%-T2, 89.4%-T3, 92.1%-T4, a whole T1-T4 on 91.3%. Diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous abdominal ultrasonography in diagnosis of metastasis to lymph nodes, vascular infiltration, and resectability was respectively 80.7%, 86%, 91.4%. CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous abdominal ultrasonography has high diagnostic accuracy in diagnosis, staging and predicting surgical treatment of patients with pancreatic carcinoma.
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pancreatic involvement by plasma cell neoplasms is an extremely rare event, with only 50 cases described in the literature. They can present as a primary solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma or plasmacytoma secondary to a plasma cell myeloma. Clinical manifestations are due to the presence of a pancreatic mass usually in the pancreas head, which causes extra-biliary obstruction and abdominal pain. METHODS Abdominal imaging including CT scan or endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration tissue sampling is essential for the initial diagnostic procedure. However, immunohistochemical analysis of the biopsy specimen or flow cytometry of the aspirated material is crucial to prove the monoclonality and the final diagnosis of a plasma cell neoplasm. DISCUSSION Management of these situations include radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery or combined therapy. Novel medications including the immunomodulatory drugs or the proteasome inhibitors followed by consolidation with intensive chemotherapy and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation are nowadays used as upfront treatment in the cases associated to a plasma cell myeloma. CONCLUSION Despite the rarity, plasma cell neoplasms should be considered in the differential diagnosis of obstructive jaundice and pancreatic neoplasms since they are potentially treatable situations.
Collapse
|
32
|
Tummala P, Junaidi O, Agarwal B. Imaging of pancreatic cancer: An overview. J Gastrointest Oncol 2012; 2:168-74. [PMID: 22811847 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2011.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2011] [Accepted: 08/07/2011] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PaCa) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. The median size of pancreatic adenocarcinoma at the time of diagnosis is about 31 mm and has not changed significantly in last three decades despite major advances in imaging technology that can help diagnose increasingly smaller tumors. This is largely because patients are asymptomatic till late in course of pancreatic cancer or have nonspecific symptoms. Increased awareness of pancreatic cancer amongst the clinicians and knowledge of the available imaging modalities and their optimal use in evaluation of patients suspected to have pancreatic cancer can potentially help in diagnosing more early stage tumors. Another major challenge in the management of patients with pancreatic cancer involves reliable determination of resectability. Only about 10% of pancreatic adenocarcinomas are resectable at the time of diagnosis and would potentially benefit from a R0 surgical resection. The final determination of resectability cannot be made until late during surgical resection. Failure to identify unresectable tumor pre-operatively can result in considerable morbidity and mortality due to an unnecessary surgery. In this review, we review the relative advantages and shortcomings of imaging modalities available for evaluation of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer and for preoperative determination of resectability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavan Tummala
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Glant JA, Waters JA, House MG, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD, Schmidt CM. Does the interval from imaging to operation affect the rate of unanticipated metastasis encountered during operation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma? Surgery 2011; 150:607-16. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2011] [Accepted: 07/11/2011] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
34
|
Ambe P, Kautz C, Shadouh S, Heggemann S, Köhler L. Primary sarcoma of the pancreas, a rare histopathological entity. A case report with review of literature. World J Surg Oncol 2011; 9:85. [PMID: 21812970 PMCID: PMC3168409 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-9-85] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2011] [Accepted: 08/03/2011] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims primary pancreatic sarcomas represent an extremely rare histopathological entity accounting for less than 0.1% of all pancreatic malignancies. Pancreatic sarcomas tend to be more aggressive and have a poor prognosis. Methods the case of a 52 year old patient presenting with jaundice is presented and the available literature was reviewed. Results primary pancreatic sarcomas are extremely rare. Pancreatic sarcomas are more aggressive than other pancreatic neoplasms. Conclusion primary sarcomas of the pancreas are extremely rare, are aggressive and are associated with very poor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Ambe
- Department of Surgery, St, Elisabeth Kreiskrankenhaus Grevenbroich, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der RWTH Aachen, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Morisaka H, Sou H, Muhi A, Kimura K, Sano K, Araki T. Detection of pancreatic carcinoma and liver metastases with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging: comparison with contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT. Radiology 2011; 260:446-53. [PMID: 21693662 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11103548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To intraindividually compare gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with contrast material-enhanced multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) in detection of pancreatic carcinoma and liver metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS The ethics committee approved this retrospective study with waiver of informed consent. This study included 100 patients (53 men, 47 women; mean age, 67.8 years) consisting of 54 patients with pathologically confirmed pancreatic carcinoma (mean size, 33 mm) and 46 without a pancreatic lesion. Sixty-two liver metastases (mean size, 10 mm) in 15 patients with pancreatic carcinoma were diagnosed at pathologic examination or multimodality assessment. Three readers blinded to the final diagnosis interpreted all MR (precontrast T1- and T2-weighted and gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic and hepatocyte phase MR images) and tetraphasic dynamic contrast-enhanced CT images and graded the presence (or absence) of pancreatic carcinoma and liver metastasis on patient-by-patient and lesion-by-lesion bases. Receiver operating characteristic analysis, McNemar test, and Fisher test were performed to compare the diagnostic performance of CT and MR imaging. RESULTS No significant differences were observed between CT and MR images in depiction of pancreatic carcinoma. However, MR imaging had greater sensitivity in depicting liver metastasis than did CT for two of the three readers in the MR imaging-versus-CT analysis (85% vs 69%, P = .046) and for all three readers in the lesion-by-lesion analysis (92%-94% vs 74%-76%, P = .030-.044). CONCLUSION Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging was equivalent to dynamic contrast-enhanced CT in depicting pancreatic carcinoma and had better sensitivity for depicting liver metastases, suggesting the usefulness of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging for evaluation of patients with pancreatic carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Utaroh Motosugi
- Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo-shi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Walters DM, Lapar DJ, de Lange EE, Sarti M, Stokes JB, Adams RB, Bauer TW. Pancreas-protocol imaging at a high-volume center leads to improved preoperative staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18:2764-71. [PMID: 21484522 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-1693-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2010] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-quality preoperative cross-sectional imaging is vital to accurately stage patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We hypothesized that imaging performed at a high-volume pancreatic cancer center with pancreatic imaging protocols more accurately stages patients compared with pre-referral imaging. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed data from all patients with PDAC who presented to the surgical oncology clinic at our institution between June 2005 and August 2009. Detailed preoperative imaging, staging, and operative data were collected for each patient. RESULTS A total of 230 patients with PDAC were identified, of which 169 had pre-referral imaging. Patients were selectively reimaged at our institution based on the quality and timing of imaging at the outside facility: 108 (47%) patients were deemed resectable, 54 (23.5%) were deemed borderline-resectable, and 68 (29.5%) were deemed unresectable. Of the resectable patients, 99 opted for resection. Eighty-two of those 99 patients underwent preoperative imaging at our institution, and of these 27% had unresectable disease at the time of surgery compared with 47% of patients who only had pre-referral imaging (p = 0.14). Reimaging altered staging and changed management in 56% of patients. Among that group were 55 patients, categorized as resectable on pre-referral imaging, who on repeat imaging were deemed to be borderline resectable (n = 27) or unresectable (n = 28). CONCLUSIONS Pancreas-protocol imaging at a high-volume center improves preoperative staging and alters management in a significant proportion of patients with PDAC who undergo pre-referral imaging. Thus, repeat imaging with pancreas protocols and dedicated radiologists is justified at high-volume centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dustin M Walters
- Department of Surgery, The University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Klauss M, Lemke A, Grünberg K, Simon D, Re TJ, Wente MN, Laun FB, Kauczor HU, Delorme S, Grenacher L, Stieltjes B. Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI for the differentiation between mass forming chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma. Invest Radiol 2011; 46:57-63. [PMID: 21139505 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0b013e3181fb3bf2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine which of the quantitative parameters obtained from intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is the most significant for the differentiation between pancreatic carcinoma and mass-forming chronic pancreatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-nine patients with pancreatic masses were included, 9 proved to have a mass-forming pancreatitis and 20 had a pancreatic carcinoma. The patients were studied using intravoxel incoherent motion DWI with 11 b-values and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), the true diffusion constant (D) and the perfusion fraction (f) were calculated. The diagnostic strength of the parameters was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS The ADC in chronic pancreatitis was higher than in pancreatic carcinoma with significant differences at b = 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300 s/mm (ADC50 = 3.17 ± 0.67 vs. 2.55 ± 1.09, ADC75 = 2.46 ± 0.4 vs. 1.93 ± 0.52, ADC100 = 2.28 ± 0.48 vs. 1.73 ± 0.45, ADC150 = 1.97 ± 0.26 vs. 1.63 ± 0.40, ADC200 = 1.98 ± 0.24 vs. 1.53 ± 0.28, and ADC300 = 1.76 ± 0.19 vs. 1.46 ± 0.31 × 10(-3) mm2/s). No significant differences were found at b = 25, 400, 600, and 800 s/mm (ADC25 = 4.69 ± 0.65 vs. 4.04 ± 1.35, ADC400 = 1.57 ± 0.21 vs. 1.37 ± 0.30, ADC600 = 1.38 ± 0.18 vs. 1.24 ± 0.25, and ADC800 = 1.27 ± 0.10 vs. 1.18 ± 0.19 × 10(-3) mm2/s) nor using ADCtot (1.42 ± 0.23 vs. 1.28 ± 0.12 × 10(-3) mm2/s). The perfusion fraction f was significantly higher in pancreatitis compared with pancreatic carcinoma (16.3% ± 5.30% vs. 8.2% ± 4.00%, P = 0.0001). There was no significant difference between groups for D (1.07 ± 0.224 × 10(-3) mm2/s for chronic pancreatitis and 1.09 ± 0.3 × 10(-3) mm2/s for pancreatic carcinoma, P = 0.66). For f, the highest area under the curve (0.894) and combined sensitivity (80%) and specificity (89.9%) were found. CONCLUSIONS There were significant differences in ADC50-300 between chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma. Because D is not significantly different between groups, differences in ADC can be attributed mainly to differences in perfusion. The perfusion fraction f proved to be the superior DWI-derived parameter for differentiation of mass-forming pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Klauss
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Okano K, Kakinoki K, Akamoto S, Hagiike M, Usuki H, Yamamoto Y, Nishiyama Y, Suzuki Y. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of small pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17:231-5. [PMID: 21245997 PMCID: PMC3020378 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i2.231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2010] [Revised: 05/24/2010] [Accepted: 05/31/2010] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the diagnosis of small pancreatic cancer.
METHODS: This study involved 31 patients with proven invasive ductal cancer of the pancreas. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the maximum diameter of the tumor: TS1 (maximum tumor size ≤ 2.0 cm), TS2 (> 2.0 cm and ≤ 4.0 cm) or TS3-4 (> 4.0 cm). The relationships between the TS and various diagnostic tools, including FDG-PET with dual time point evaluation, were analyzed.
RESULTS: The tumors ranged from 1.3 to 11.0 cm in diameter. Thirty of the 31 patients (97%) had a positive FDG-PET study. There were 5 patients classified as TS1, 15 as TS2 and 11 as TS3-4. The sensitivity of FDG-PET, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were 100%, 40%, 0% in TS1, 93%, 93%, 89% in TS2 and 100%, 100%, 100% in TS3-4. The sensitivity of FDG-PET was significantly higher in comparison to CT and MRI in patients with TS1 (P < 0.032). The mean standardized uptake values (SUVs) did not show a significant difference in relation to the TS (TS1: 5.8 ± 4.5, TS2: 5.7 ± 2.2, TS3-4: 8.2 ± 3.9), respectively. All the TS1 tumors (from 13 to 20 mm) showed higher SUVs in FDG-PET with dual time point evaluation in the delayed phase compared with the early phase, which suggested the lesions were malignant.
CONCLUSION: These results indicate that FDG-PET with dual time point evaluation is a useful modality for the detection of small pancreatic cancers with a diameter of less than 20 mm.
Collapse
|
39
|
Heller MT, Johnson N, Fargiano A. Pancreatic neoplasia: a practical cross-sectional imaging primer for the nonradiologist. J Gastrointest Cancer 2011; 43:148-56. [PMID: 21221845 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-010-9250-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this article is to provide a practical review of basic pancreatic imaging protocols and key cross-sectional imaging findings of the more common pancreatic neoplasms. METHODS We performed a literature search and reviewed numerous cases archived in the radiology department of a large university hospital to find examples which illustrate the key cross-sectional imaging findings of pancreatic neoplasms. RESULTS We reviewed the literature and provided several practical examples of common cross-sectional imaging findings in patients with pancreatic neoplasms. CONCLUSIONS Cross-sectional imaging plays a pivotal role in the evaluation of pancreatic neoplasms and allows proper triage of patients for conservative, medical or surgical management due to its ability to reliably detect and characterize pancreatic lesions, determine involvement of local structures, and assess metastatic disease. Familiarity with the key imaging findings will allow the clinician to better implement imaging data into daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew T Heller
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Erten A, Hall D, Hoh C, Tran Cao HS, Kaushal S, Esener S, Hoffman RM, Bouvet M, Chen J, Kesari S, Makale M. Enhancing magnetic resonance imaging tumor detection with fluorescence intensity and lifetime imaging. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS 2010; 15:066012. [PMID: 21198186 PMCID: PMC3014225 DOI: 10.1117/1.3509111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2010] [Revised: 09/17/2010] [Accepted: 09/21/2010] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Early detection is important for many solid cancers but the images provided by ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography applied alone or together, are often not sufficient for decisive early screening ∕ diagnosis. We demonstrate that MRI augmented with fluorescence intensity (FI) substantially improves detection. Early stage murine pancreatic tumors that could not be identified by blinded, skilled observers using MRI alone, were easily identified with MRI along with FI images acquired with photomultiplier tube detection and offset laser scanning. Moreover, we show that fluorescence lifetime (FLT) imaging enables positive identification of the labeling fluorophore and discriminates it from surrounding tissue autofluorescence. Our data suggest combined-modality imaging with MRI, FI, and FLT can be used to screen and diagnose early tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmet Erten
- University of California, San Diego, CA 92150, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Fusari M, Maurea S, Imbriaco M, Mollica C, Avitabile G, Soscia F, Camera L, Salvatore M. Comparison between multislice CT and MR imaging in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with pancreatic masses. Radiol Med 2010; 115:453-66. [PMID: 20077047 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-010-0490-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2009] [Accepted: 05/12/2009] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study compared the results of multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and high-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnostic evaluation of pancreatic masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty patients with clinical and ultrasonographic evidence of pancreatic masses underwent MSCT and MRI. The majority of patients (31/40, 78%) had proven malignant pancreatic tumours (24 ductal adenocarcinoma, six mucinous cystadenocarcinoma, one intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma), whereas the remaining patients (9/40, 22%) were found to have benign lesions (eight chronic pancreatitis, one serous cystadenoma). Results of the imaging studies were compared with biopsy (n=33) and/or histology (n=7) findings to calculate sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive value for correct identification of tumours and evaluation of resectability of malignancies. RESULTS Both for tumour identification and resectability, MSCT and MRI had comparable diagnostic accuracy, with no statistically significant differences between them. Tumour identification CT/MRI: accuracy 98/98%, sensitivity 100/100%, specificity 88/88%, PPV 97/97%, NPV 100/100%; tumour resectability CT/MRI: accuracy 94/90%, sensitivity 92/88%, specificity 100/100%, PPV 100/100%, NPV 78/70%. CONCLUSIONS MRI represents a valid diagnostic alternative to CT in the evaluation of patients with pancreatic masses, both for correct identification and characterisation of primary lesions and to establish resectability in the case of malignancies. New high-field MRI equipment allows optimal imaging quality with good contrast resolution in evaluating the upper abdomen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Fusari
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomorfologiche e Funzionali (DSBMF), Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II (UNINA), Istituto di Biostrutture e Bioimmagini (IBB), Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Fondazione SDN (IRCCS), Napoli, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Extrapancreatic neural plexus invasion by pancreatic carcinoma: characteristics on magnetic resonance imaging. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2009; 34:634-41. [PMID: 18665418 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-008-9440-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our objective is to study the characteristics of extrapancreatic neural plexus invasion by pancreatic carcinoma on MR imaging. METHODS 20 patients with both pancreatic carcinoma and extrapancreatic neural plexus invasion confirmed by pathology were recruited in this study. MR imaging was performed within 1 month before surgery. On MR images, signal intensity at the site of potential extrapancreatic neural plexus invasion, lymph nodes and tumor size were noted. The relationship of extrapancreatic neural plexus invasion to these findings was analyzed. RESULTS Signs of extrapancreatic neural plexus invasion were depicted on MR imaging in 80% of patients, which included streaky and strand-like signal intensity structure in fat tissue in 50% of patients and irregular masses adjacent to tumor in 30%. Signal intensity at invasion site was similar to that of pancreatic carcinoma. The frequencies of patients with vascular invasion and with lymph nodes larger than 5 mm were, respectively, 50% and 55%. Tumor diameter was 24 +/- 7 mm on MR imaging. Extrapancreatic neural plexus invasion was correlated with vascular invasion (r = 0.58, P < 0.005), slightly related with lymphadenopathy (r = 0.35, 0.1 > P > 0.05), but not related with tumor size. CONCLUSION MR imaging is useful to depict extrapancreatic neural plexus invasion by pancreatic carcinoma.
Collapse
|
43
|
Boraschi P, Donati F, Gigoni R, Salemi S, Faggioni L, Del Chiaro M, Boggi U, Bartolozzi C, Falaschi F. Secretin-stimulated multi-detector CT versus mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR imaging plus MRCP in characterization of non-metastatic solid pancreatic lesions. Dig Liver Dis 2009; 41:829-37. [PMID: 19303825 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2009.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2008] [Revised: 01/26/2009] [Accepted: 02/10/2009] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Our study was aimed to compare multiphasic multi-detector computed tomography after secretin stimulation and mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging plus MR cholangiopancreatography in the characterization of solid pancreatic lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty patients with ultrasound diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesion prospectively underwent both multi-detector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Three minutes after intravenous administration of secretin, post-contrast computed tomography scans were performed 40, 80, and 180 s after contrast medium injection. MR protocol included axial/coronal, thin/thick-slab, single-shot T2 w sequences and axial/coronal T1 w breath-hold spoiled gradient-echo images before and 30-40 min after intravenous infusion of manganese dipyri-doxal diphosphate. Different observers blindly evaluated the ability of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging to characterize focal pancreatic lesions. Surgery, biopsy, and/or follow-up were considered as our diagnostic gold standard. RESULTS Thirty-five focal pancreatic lesions (adenocarcinoma, n=18; focal chronic pancreatitis, n=4; endocrine tumor, n=6; metastasis, n=1; cystic tumor, n=3; indeterminate cystic lesions, n=3) were present in 34 patients since the remaining 6 subjects showed no pathological finding. Both multi-detector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging showed a statistically significant correlation with the gold standard and between themselves in the characterization of 29 solid lesions of the pancreas (p<0.05). CONCLUSION Both imaging techniques well correlate to final diagnosis of non-metastatic solid pancreatic lesions and particularly of adenocarcinomas with a slight advantage for mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging plus MR cholangiopancreatography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Boraschi
- 2nd Department of Radiology, Pisa University Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Park HS, Lee JM, Choi HK, Hong SH, Han JK, Choi BI. Preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography versus MDCT. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 30:586-95. [PMID: 19711405 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including dynamic imaging using three-dimensional gradient-echo (3D-GRE) sequences and MR cholangiopancreatograpy (MRCP) compared with that of multidetector row CT (MDCT) with regard to resectability in pancreas cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS From February 2004 to July 2008, 54 patients (32 men, 22 women: age range, 28-83 years; mean age, 63.1 years old) with surgically proven pancreatic carcinoma, who had undergone preoperative gadolinium-enhanced 3D-GRE MRI with MRCP and triple-phase MDCT, were included in this retrospective study. Two, clinically experienced attending radiologists independently reviewed the two image sets. These readers evaluated the tumor conspicuity, presence of vascular invasion, choledochal and duodenal invasion, lymph node metastases, distant metastasis, and tumor resectability. The results were compared with the surgical and histopathologic findings using receiver operating characteristic analysis (Az) and kappa statistics. RESULTS Curative resections were performed on 42 patients. Regarding the tumor conspicuity, MRI had a significantly higher Az value compared with MDCT according to both reviewers (P < 0.05). The accuracy of resectability was Az = 0.753 and 0.768 on MRI and Az = 0.829 and 0.762 on MDCT for each reviewer, and the difference in the accuracy of resectability was not significant between MRI and MDCT for either reviewer (P > 0.05). Two imaging sets showed a similar diagnostic performance in the evaluation of vascular involvement, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis. CONCLUSION Dynamic 3D-GRE MRI with MRCP shows superior tumor conspicuity and similar diagnostic performance compared with MDCT in evaluating the resectability of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hee Sun Park
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Vachiranubhap B, Kim YH, Balci NC, Semelka RC. Magnetic resonance imaging of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 20:3-9. [PMID: 19687720 DOI: 10.1097/rmr.0b013e3181b48392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a valuable tool in the assessment of the full spectrum of pancreatic disease. A standard MR protocol including noncontrast T1-weighted fat-suppressed and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced gradient-echo imagings is sensitive for the evaluation of pancreatic cancer. Optimal use of MRI in the investigation of pancreatic cancer occurs in the following circumstances: (1) detection of small non-contour-deforming tumors, (2) evaluation of local extension and vascular encasement, (3) determination of the presence of lymph node and peritoneal metastases, and (4) determination and characterization of associated liver lesions and liver metastases. The objective of this study was to describe the attribute of MRI for evaluating pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
|
46
|
Zhang XM, Mitchell DG, Byun JH, Verma SK, Bergin D, Witkiewicz A. MR imaging for predicting the recurrence of pancreatic carcinoma after surgical resection. Eur J Radiol 2009; 73:572-8. [PMID: 19153022 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2008] [Revised: 09/09/2008] [Accepted: 12/03/2008] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the relationship of characteristics of pancreatic carcinoma on MR imaging to tumor recurrence time after surgical resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-seven patients with pancreatic carcinoma were followed up at least 2 years after surgical resection of the tumor. All patients had MR imaging within 1 month before surgery. The tumor's size, signal intensity, local and vascular invasion, abdominal lymphadenopathy on MR imaging and the positive surgical margin were noted. The results from MR imaging were compared with the duration after surgery until tumor recurrence and with the positive surgical margin. RESULTS 59% of patients had various degree of extrapancreatic invasion. The tumor recurrence times were, respectively, 24+/-21 months and 26+/-29 months in patients with and without vascular invasion (P=0.79). The combination of vascular with local invasion showed a correlation to the time of tumor recurrence (r=-0.34; P<0.05). Patients with positive surgical margins had a higher local invasion score on MR imaging and a shorter recurrence time than those with negative surgical margins. The number and size of lymph nodes were not related with tumor recurrence time. CONCLUSION MR imaging was useful for predicting the recurrence of pancreatic carcinoma after surgical resection. Local invasion associated with and without vascular invasion on MR imaging was the indicator for the tumor recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Ming Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Seo S, Doi R, Machimoto T, Kami K, Masui T, Hatano E, Ogawa K, Higashi T, Uemoto S. Contribution of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to the diagnosis of early pancreatic carcinoma. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2008; 15:634-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s00534-007-1339-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2007] [Accepted: 12/28/2007] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|
48
|
Francis IR. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: diagnosis and staging using multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Cancer Imaging 2007; 7 Spec No A:S160-5. [PMID: 17921087 PMCID: PMC2727968 DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2007.9010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma continues to be a leading cause of cancer death in the Western world and is amongst the leading gastrointestinal cancers. The incidence of pancreatic cancer has been stable or slowly rising in the past few decades. Overall the prognosis is poor with 5-year survival rates still under 5%. Therefore early detection and accurate staging of these tumors is crucial for optimal treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac R Francis
- University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
It is anticipated that there will be 37,170 new cases of pancreatic cancer diagnosed in the United States this year, resulting in approximately 33,370 deaths from the disease. Approximately 40% of these patients will present with locally advanced, non-metastatic disease. Treatment regimens that incorporate conventional radiation therapy for local tumor control, and chemotherapy to prevent distant failure in this metastasis-prone malignancy, are the current standard of care. A number of clinical studies have been undertaken to establish the optimal definitive chemoradiation treatment in this setting. Other potential treatment strategies include chemoradiation incorporating novel chemotherapeutic agents, intraoperative radiation therapy, brachytherapy, and the integration of combined therapies that utilize targeted molecular agents. This review summarizes the current status, controversies, and future prospects for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
Although the benefit of adjuvant therapy for pancreas cancer is clear, the most effective therapy remains elusive. In the United States, combination therapy with chemotherapy and radiation remains the standard of care, while in other parts of the world the contribution of radiation is questioned. Clinical trials are reported evaluating the benefit of post-resection radiation and chemotherapy with 5-fluoruoracil (5FU), gemcitabine, and combination therapy; chemotherapy alone with either 5FU or gemcitabine; and pre-resection chemotherapy and radiation. Attention to pancreas cancer staging, radiation techniques, and clinical trial design are paramount to interpreting the outcomes from adjuvant therapy. Therapeutic advances will be made with new approaches studied in carefully controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary F Mulcahy
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| |
Collapse
|