Dysphagia is associated with increased mortality and healthcare costs. The modified barium swallow study (MBS) is the gold standard in assessing oropharyngeal dysphagia, but does not evaluate the esophagus. A barium esophagram can visualize the esophagus but does not evaluate the oropharyngeal swallow, nor does it utilize the expertise of speech and language pathologists. Providers may order one or both studies yet still risk missing critical pathology.

Retrospective cohort study.

A retrospective chart review was conducted at an academic medical center between January 2016 and June 2019 focused on patients who had both MBS and esophagram as imaging for dysphagia evaluation. Analysis determined whether MBS and esophagram performed concomitantly improved diagnostic clarity.

A total of 5,183 patients underwent 6,066 swallow studies for dysphagia in the study period. Of which, 124 of these patients had concurrent MBS and esophagram. 10.5% of concurrent studies demonstrated a congruent negative evaluation. 59.7% of patients had an unremarkable MBS or esophagram paired with abnormal findings within the corresponding esophagram or MBS, respectively. 29.8% had both MBS and esophagrams that demonstrated an abnormality, but with unique pathologies identified by each study. In total, 85.1% of unremarkable MBS or esophagrams were paired with abnormal findings in the corresponding esophagram or MBS, respectively.

Selection of diagnostic testing is variable among providers and may be influenced by healthcare systems. This analysis revealed that MBS and esophagrams provide unique diagnoses. Concurrent MBS and esophagrams may improve diagnostic accuracy, yet minimize additional studies. National practices around dysphagia diagnostics are inconsistent and would benefit from standardization.

4 Laryngoscope, 2021.

This review summarizes the relevant literature for the initial imaging of patients with symptoms of dysphagia. For patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia who have an underlying attributable cause, a modified barium swallow is usually appropriate for initial imaging but for those who have unexplained dysphagia a fluoroscopic biphasic esophagram is usually appropriate. Fluoroscopic biphasic esophagram is usually appropriate for initial imaging in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients who have retrosternal dysphagia. For postoperative patients with dysphagia, fluoroscopic single-contrast esophagram and CT neck and chest with intravenous (IV) contrast are usually appropriate for oropharyngeal or retrosternal dysphagia occurring in the early postoperative period where water-soluble contrast is usually preferred rather than barium sulfate. In the later postoperative period (greater than 1 month), CT neck and chest with IV contrast and fluoroscopic single-contrast esophagram are usually appropriate. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

The barium esophagogram is a global test for patients with dysphagia that can simultaneously detect morphologic abnormalities in the pharynx and esophagus, pharyngeal swallowing dysfunction, esophageal dysmotility, and gastroesophageal reflux. The barium esophagram is an inexpensive, noninvasive, and widely available procedure that can serve as the initial diagnostic test for dysphagia and facilitate selection of other diagnostic studies such as endoscopy. This article addresses 10 questions about barium esophagography and dysphagia that should help gastroenterologists gain a better perspective about the utility of barium studies in this clinical setting.

Fluoroscopic esophagography is a widely available, safe, and inexpensive test for detecting gastroesophageal reflux disease. In this article, we review the technique for performing a high-quality esophagram, including upright, double-contrast views of the esophagus and cardia with high-density barium; prone, single-contrast views of the esophagus with low-density barium; and evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux. We then discuss the radiographic findings associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease, including esophageal dysmotility, reflux esophagitis, peptic strictures, and Barrett's esophagus. Finally, we consider the differential diagnosis for the various radiographic findings associated with this condition. When carefully performed and interpreted, the esophagram is a useful test for evaluating gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications.

The esophagus may be involved by a variety of morphologic abnormalities, including nodules and plaques, ulceration, distal esophageal strictures and rings, upper or midesophageal strictures, and diffuse narrowing (also known as a small-caliber esophagus). The use of a pattern approach for evaluating esophageal disease on barium studies facilitates diagnosis of a host of pathologic conditions associated with these morphologic abnormalities. This article therefore presents an approach for diagnosing esophageal disease on barium studies that emphasizes the radiographic and clinical features used to differentiate the underlying causes of disease and the diagnostic pitfalls associated with performing and interpreting these studies.

Dysphagia is a common clinical problem whose prevalence is increasing with the aging population in the United States. The term dysphagia is commonly used to describe subjective awareness of swallowing difficulty during the passage of a bolus from the mouth to the stomach or the perception of obstruction during swallowing. Dysphagia may be further classified as oropharyngeal or substernal, depending on the location of this sensation. It can be due to benign or malignant structural lesions, esophageal motility abnormalities, oropharyngeal dysfunction (including aspiration), neuromuscular disorders, or postsurgical changes and is also associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Pathologic conditions of the oral cavity, pharynx, esophagus, and proximal stomach can manifest with dysphagia. Imaging remains the preferred method for evaluating patients with dysphagia, and dysphagia is an increasingly encountered indication for radiologic evaluation. Fluoroscopic studies, including the modified barium swallow and esophagography in particular, are often used in the assessment of patients with dysphagia, and the techniques used for these studies should be tailored to the patient's needs. Fluoroscopic studies can be used to evaluate the esophagus for structural abnormalities (eg, webs, diverticula, strictures, masses) and to assess function (eg, the swallowing mechanism and esophageal motility). Knowledge of the imaging spectrum of disease entities that may cause dysphagia and thorough radiologic assessment with a tailored approach may help avoid misdiagnosis.

GI cancers are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that differ in their biologic and physical behaviors depending on the organ of origin, location within the organ, and degree of differentiation. As a result, evaluation of these tumors is complex, requiring integration of information from a patient's clinical history, physical examination, laboratory data, and imaging. With advances in anatomic and functional imaging techniques, we now have tools for assessing patients with these tumors at diagnosis, staging, and treatment assessment. It is difficult for a single imaging modality to provide all the necessary information for a given GI tumor. However, well-chosen combinations of available imaging modalities based on the indications, strength, and limitations of the modalities will provide optimal evaluation of patients with these malignancies.

This study was performed to evaluate the usefulness of digital cineradiography in detecting swallowing disorders in dysphagic patients affected by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) with a view to planning an adequate therapeutic approach.

From January 2005 to September 2006, 23 patients (10 men and 13 women; mean age 41.3+/-8.6 years) affected by ALS were evaluated with digital cineradiography to assess the grade of dysphagia. All patients were classified using the Hillel ALS Severity Scale (ALSSS). All examinations were performed with radiocontrolled equipment provided with a digital C-arm.

The cineradiographic technique enabled us to differentiate patients with disorders of the oral (17/23) and/or pharyngeal (19/23) swallowing phase from those without swallowing dysfunction (4/23). In 14/23 patients, passage of contrast medium into the upper airways was observed during swallowing, whereas in 5/23 cases, aspiration of contrast medium into the lower airways was recorded.

The videofluoroscopic swallowing study has high diagnostic capabilities in the evaluation of swallowing disorders, as it is able to identify the degree and causes of impairment. In addition, the study proved useful for planning speech therapy and for follow-up in patients with ALS.

The aim of our study was to assess the availability of videofluoroscopy to examine patients with swallowing disorders in Austria.

A questionnaire was sent to the department heads of the radiology departments of all hospitals (n=143) and to all non-hospital-based radiologic practices (n=226) throughout Austria. The survey focused on the availability of videofluoroscopic swallowing studies and on the studies performed in patients with deglutition disorders.

The questionnaire was completed and returned by 134 of 143 radiology departments (94%) and 65 of 226 non-hospital-based radiologists (29%). Videofluoroscopic swallowing studies were performed in 38 of 134 radiology departments (28%) and in 21 of 65 practices (32%). The method is available in all nine Austrian states (100%) and 27 of 99 districts (27%). The number of examinations performed in different states ranged from 0.7 to 19 studies/10,000 population per year. The number of videofluoroscopic examinations per department or practice in the year 2001 ranged between 5 and 690 (median, 100 examinations). To 85% of videofluoroscopy units patients were referred from otorhinolaryngology/phoniatrics-logopedics, to 69% of videofluoroscopy units referrals were also from internal medicine, from neurology in 54%, and from pediatrics in 20%.

Despite the widespread availability of videofluoroscopy throughout Austria, its use still varies largely between different states. The data show that in general there is a wide-spread demand for videofluoroscopic swallowing studies.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the types of swallowing abnormalities that occur in symptomatic patients who have undergone cardiovascular surgery.

From 1994 to 2001, 22 patients (17 males and five females; age range, 4-89 years; mean age, 64 years) who had swallowing abnormalities after cardiovascular surgery were referred for a videofluoroscopic swallowing study. Each study was analyzed for functional abnormalities of the tongue, soft palate, epiglottis, hyoid and larynx, pharynx, upper esophageal sphincter, and esophagus. Also, the performance of transesophageal echocardiography, long-term intubation, or both was noted.

Swallowing abnormalities were present in 18 patients (81.8%) (range, one to eight functional abnormalities; mean, 3.9 functional abnormalities). The distribution of abnormalities across the functional units statistically significantly deviated (chi(2) = 14.4; df = 6; p = 0.025) from uniform distribution, with abnormalities most commonly involving the hyoid and larynx (13 patients [59.1%]) and the pharynx (10 patients [45.5%]). Aspiration was found in 13 patients (59.1%) (predeglutitive, n = 1; intradeglutitive, n = 4; postdeglutitive, n = 3; and mixed, n = 5). In the 14 patients (63.6%) who underwent transesophageal echocardiography, long-term intubation, or both, we frequently found incomplete tilting of the epiglottis, pharyngeal weakness, and postdeglutitive aspiration.

Most patients with swallowing problems after cardiovascular surgery present with multiple abnormalities that most commonly affect the hyoid and larynx and the pharynx and result predominantly in intra- or postdeglutitive aspiration. The performance of transesophageal echocardiography and long-term intubation may influence the types of swallowing abnormalities.

The esophageal level on radiography was compared with that at endoscopy by establishing a relationship between the radiologic landmarks, i.e., the vertebral level and the distance from the carina, and the distance from the incisor at endoscopy.

Three hundred ninety spot films in 65 patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were analyzed. Six spot films were obtained for each patient, wherein the distances of the endoscopic tip were located at 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, and 45 cm from the incisors. On each radiogram, the vertebral level scores were measured as 1 to 12, for the location of the endoscopic tip at the levels of T1 through T12, respectively. When the endoscopic tip was located at the lower half of the vertebral body, 0.5 point was added to the vertebral level score and when the tip was noted at the upper half of it, no additional score was given. The distance between the endoscopic tip and the carina was also measured. Correlations of the distance of the endoscopic tip from the incisors on endoscopy with the vertebral body levels and the distance from the carina on radiography, accounting for patient height, were analyzed by multiple linear regression and equations were extracted.

Equation 1 for the vertebral level score (VL) for a given distance of endoscopic tip from incisor (DI) at a given patient height (H) was VL = 0.432DI - 0.048H + 0.099 (r2 = 0.968). Equation 2 for the distance from the carina (DC) for a given DI at a given H was DC = 0.957DI - 0.137H - 5.841 (r2 = 0.983). Two tables denoting radiologic VLs and DCs for given endoscopic DIs and patients' heights were generated using these equations.

Regressed equations and tables will enable radiologists to better localize the esophageal lesions that are seen at endoscopy, and vice versa.

This study evaluated the clinical significance of pharyngeal retention to predict aspiration in patients with dysphagia.

At videofluoroscopy, pharyngeal retention was found in 108 (28%; 73 males, 35 females; mean age, 60 years) of 386 patients with a suspected deglutition disorder. Swallowing function was assessed videofluoroscopically. The amount of residual contrast material in the valleculae or piriform sinuses was graded as mild, moderate, or severe. The frequency, type, and grade of aspiration were assessed.

Pharyngeal retention was caused by pharyngeal weakness or paresis in 103 (95%) of 108 patients. In 70 patients (65%) with pharyngeal retention, postdeglutitive overflow aspiration was found. Aspiration was more often found in patients who had additional functional abnormalities such as incomplete laryngeal closure or impaired epiglottic tilting (p < 0.05). Postdeglutitive aspiration was diagnosed in 25% patients with mild, in 29% with moderate, and in 89% with severe pharyngeal retention (p < 0.05).

Postdeglutitive overflow aspiration is a frequent finding in patients with pharyngeal retention, and the risk of aspiration increases markedly with the amount of residue. Functional abnormalities other than pharyngeal weakness, such as impaired laryngeal closure, may contribute to aspiration.

The barium esophagram is an essential component in the workup of a patient with dysphagia and gastroesophageal reflux disease, especially when considering antireflux surgery or after such surgery. The examination requires a flexible approach with an emphasis on the motility portion of the examination. When properly performed, the examination should identify the following: normal or impaired esophageal emptying; normal or abnormal motility; the presence and type of hiatal hernia; the presence of a distal stricture or mucosal ring; and in many instances, the presence of gastroesophageal reflux. In patients after antireflux surgery, the examination should identify the following: normal of impaired esophageal emptying; normal or abnormal motility; the location, tightness, and length of the fundoplication; the presence of a recurrent hernia; and the presence of gastroesophageal reflux.

The purpose of the present paper was to determine if pharyngeal or cervical oesophageal lesions may present with distal symptoms. All patients presenting for barium swallow underwent examination of the pharynx and oesophagus. The pharyngeal examination included spot films of the pharynx as well as views of the pharyngo-oesophageal segment filmed at three frames per second. During the 18-month period of the present study interrogations were carried out to identify patients without symptoms in the cervical or suprasternal region. One hundred and twelve patients were identified; 58 were male and 54 were female. The age range was 18-84 years. Examinations revealed abnormalities within the pharynx in 42 patients (38%); of this group of 42, 34 also had an oesophageal abnormality. The majority of the pharyngeal findings were minor. There were, however, three patients who each had a pharyngeal abnormality (pharyngeal carcinoma, obstructive cricopharyngeal narrowing, pharyngo-oesophageal junction stricture) as well as an oesophageal lesion (hiatal hernia, achalasia, reflux oesophagitis), either of which may have been the source of the symptoms. The remaining eight patients (7%) of this group of 42 with detected pharyngeal abnormality had normal oesophageal examinations. Most of these were again minor changes and were unlikely to be significant. There was, however, one patient in whom the only abnormality was an infiltrative cancer of the posterior wall of the pharyngo-oesophageal junction. In conclusion, the identification of patients in the present study with pharyngeal lesions and without distal abnormal findings indicates that a proximal lesion may present with downstream symptoms. Furthermore, there were also patients in whom the examination found abnormalities in multiple segments of the pharynx and oesophagus. We suggest that examination of the pharynx is warranted as part of the barium swallow in patients without cervical or suprasternal symptoms.

Videofluoroscopic assessment of the spectrum and incidence of swallowing complications after state-of-the-art laryngeal cancer surgery.

We retrospectively studied videofluoroscopic examinations of 120 patients (94 men, 26 women; mean age, 58 years) with suspected complications after laryngeal resection (partial laryngectomy, 65; total laryngectomy, 55). Swallowing function (i.e., oral bolus control, laryngeal elevation and closure, presence of pharyngeal residue, aspiration) and structural abnormalities such as strictures, fistulas and tumour recurrence were assessed by videofluoroscopy.

Abnormalities were found in 110 patients, including strictures in nine, fistulas in six and mass lesions in 13 patients. Aspiration was found in 63 patients overall (partial laryngectomy, 61/65; total laryngectomy, 2/55), occurring before swallowing in five, during swallowing in 34, after swallowing in nine and at more than one phase in 15 patients. Pharyngeal paresis was detected in three and pharyngeal weakness in 19 patients. Pharyngo-oesophageal sphincter dysfunction was observed in 10 cases.

Aspiration is a very common complication after partial laryngeal resection. It is mainly caused by incomplete laryngeal closure, sphincter dysfunction or pharyngeal pooling. Videofluoroscopy is the only radiological technique able to identify both disordered swallowing function and structural changes after laryngeal resection. Detection of these complications is crucial for appropriate further therapy.Kreuzer, S. H. (2000). Clinical Radiology55, 775-781.

This study evaluated the clinical significance of cervical osteophytes impinging on the pharynx in patients with dysphagia and the importance of concurrent disorders that may affect swallowing function.

On videofluoroscopy, anterior cervical osteophytes were found in 55 (32 men, 23 women; mean age, 69 years) of 3318 patients with dysphagia (1.7%). Coexisting diseases that affected swallowing function were found in 28 patients (stroke, n = 7; thyroidectomy, n = 7; tongue base or laryngeal cancer surgery, n = 5; other diseases, n = 9). Swallowing function was assessed with videofluoroscopy evaluating epiglottic tilting, laryngeal closure, impression of the hypopharynx, pharyngeal residue, and aspiration.

With advancing age, the probability of aspiration (odds ratio, 1.07; p < 0.05) and of enlarging osteophytes (odds ratio, 1.26; p < 0.01) increased; the probability was higher for osteophytes at more than one vertebrae (odds ratio, 8.00; p < 0.01) and for concurrent diseases (odds ratio, 8.02; p < 0.01). Aspiration was found in 75% of patients with osteophytes larger than 10 mm and in 34% with osteophytes smaller than or equal to 10 mm. In 88% of patients with small osteophytes who aspirated, other diseases affected swallowing function.

Aspiration is common in patients with dysphagia and cervical osteophytes larger than 10 mm. Aspiration is rare in patients with osteophytes smaller than or equal to 10 mm unless these patients suffer from other disorders that may affect swallowing.

The role of videofluoroscopy with the modified barium swallow in the assessment and management of motor neurone disease (MND) is discussed. Nine patients (age range 40-82) with dysphagia secondary to MND were assessed over a four-year period. The examinations were carried out by a multiprofessional team of radiologist, speech and language therapist and dietitian assessing the preoral, oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing. Preoral feeding abnormalities were present in four out of nine patients, oral phase abnormalities in eight out of nine patients, while 33% of patients demonstrated abnormality in all three phases. Where aspiration occurred (four out of nine cases), no cough reflex was noted. On the basis of these examinations management changes were introduced in all patients. Nonoral feeding was continued or introduced in three patients. Videofluoroscopic examination with the modified barium swallow may be helpful in planning suitable feeding regimes for dysphagia in MND.

This article reviews the presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of the varied pathologic conditions that result in dysphagia. The description of difficulty swallowing by a patient should direct the physician to an orderly series of diagnostic tests of esophageal function to help determine the cause of dysphagia. Some conditions that cause dysphagia also are presented in this review.

Pharyngo-oesophageal abnormalities are found in a high proportion of patients with globus sensation. This study compares the diagnostic value of static single- and double-contrast radiography of the pharynx and oesophagus with videofluoroscopy and with videofluoroscopy combined with static radiography in these patients. Pharyngeal and oesophageal morphology and motor function were studied in 130 consecutive patients with globus sensation (46 males, 84 females; mean age, 47 years) by means of static single and double-contrast radiography and by videofluoroscopy. Videofluoroscopy revealed significantly more functional and structural abnormalities compared to static radiography. Pharyngeal and/or oesophageal disorders were found in 89 vs. 47 patients (chi2 [1] = 19.82, P = 0.0001), pharyngeal abnormalities in 54 vs. 27 patients (chi2 [1] = 13.5, P < 0.0002), and oesophageal abnormalities in 72 vs. 27 patients (chi2 [1] = 28.13, P < 0.0001). Videofluoroscopy combined with static radiography revealed significantly more abnormalities than videofluoroscopy alone (chi2 [1] = 4.23, P < 0.05), and assessed mucosal details more reliably than videofluoroscopy alone. The most frequent abnormalities found were nonspecific oesophageal motor disorders, pharyngo-oesophageal sphincter dysfunction, pharyngeal stasis, achalasia, and laryngeal penetration or aspiration of barium. In most patients with globus sensation, pharyngeal and/or oesophageal abnormalities can be detected radiographically. Videofluoroscopy revealed significantly more functional but not morphological abnormalities than did static radiography. Videofluoroscopic studies combined with static radiography had a higher diagnostic value than videofluoroscopic studies alone.

To determine the specific effects of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) on deglutition, especially relative to the site of CVA, we studied videotapes of barium swallow examinations in 74 patients who had had a CVA. Although there was no distinct correlation between the prevalence of oral and pharyngeal dysfunction and the site of CVA, left CVA was prone to impair only the oral phase, and right CVA tended to impair both phases.

Anterior cervical osteophytes impinging upon the pharynx or esophagus constitute a rare cause of dysphagia. In severe cases, surgical removal of these osteophytes can provide symptomatic relief. We describe a patient of this type who failed to improve postoperatively, only to be found subsequently to have a carcinoma of the base of the tongue. To assist other clinicians in evaluating similar patients, and also to emphasize the great utility of modern radiologic techniques in these cases, we propose a diagnostic algorithm that incorporates magnetic resonance or computerized tomographic imaging.

This pictorial essay will explain how to obtain quality double- contrast radiographs during pharyngography, present principles of the interpretation of double-contrast images of the pharynx, and show examples of benign and malignant pharyngeal tumors.