The use of indocyanine green fluorescence has been shown to be a safe and effective method for improving lymph node retrieval in patients with gastric cancer. However, previous studies have focused on early-stage tumors and/or the Asian population and excluded patients who received neoadjuvant treatment.

In this study, 142 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy at a Spanish hospital between January 2017 and December 2022. Of these, 42 patients received preoperative indocyanine green injection to guide lymphadenectomy. Their outcomes were compared to a retrospective cohort of 42 patients after 1:1 propensity score matching.

The feasibility of indocyanine green lymphatic mapping was 95.5%. No complications associated with indocyanine green injection were observed. The indocyanine green group had a significantly higher number of retrieved lymph nodes than the non-indocyanine green group (32.67 vs 25.14; P = .013). This statistically significant difference was maintained across subgroups of neoadjuvant treatment, non-obese patients, pT0 to 2 stage, and pN0 stage. In 47.6% of patients from the indocyanine green group, lymphadenectomy was extended outside the standard D2 dissection area based on indocyanine green uptake, but none of the retrieved lymph nodes were metastatic. There were no differences in postoperative complications and length of hospital stay between the 2 groups.

Indocyanine green-guided lymphadenectomy is safe and feasible and increases the number of retrieved lymph nodes compared to conventional lymphatic dissection, as well as in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The use of indocyanine green should be routine if available for guiding lymph node dissection in gastric cancer, regardless of tumor stage or previous neoadjuvant treatment. However, further studies are needed to determine the impact of this technique on disease-free and overall survival.

Early stage gastric cancer, particularly T1 disease, is associated with high recurrence-free and overall survival rates following resection with curative intent. However, rare cases of T1 gastric cancer have nodal metastasis and this is associated with poor outcomes.

Data from gastric cancer patients treated with surgical resection and D2 lymph node (LN) dissection at a single tertiary care institution from 2010 to 2020 were analyzed. Patients with early stage (T1) tumors were assessed in detail to identify variables associated with regional LN metastasis including histologic differentiation, signet ring cells, demographics, smoking history, neoadjuvant therapy, and clinical staging by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). We used standard statistical techniques including Mann-Whitney U and Chi-squared tests.

Of 426 patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer, 34% (n = 146) were diagnosed with T1 disease on surgical pathology. Among 146 T1 (T1a, T1b) gastric cancers, 24 patients [(17%) T1a (n = 4), T1b (n = 20)] had histologically confirmed regional LN metastases. The age at diagnosis ranged between 19 and 91 y and 54.8% were male. Prior smoking status was not associated with nodal positivity (P = 0.650). Of the 24 patients with positive LN on final pathology, seven patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. EUS was performed on 98 (67%) of the 146 T1 patients. Of these patients, 12 (13.2%) had positive LN on final pathology; however, none (0/12) were detected on preoperative EUS. There was no association between node status on EUS and node status on final pathology (P = 0.113). The sensitivity of EUS for N status was 0%, specificity was 84.4%, negative predictive value was 82.2% and positive predictive value was 0%. Signet ring cells were identified in 42% of node negative T1 tumors and 64% of node positive T1 tumors (P = 0.063). For LN positive cases on surgical pathology, 37.5% had poor differentiation, 42% had lymphovascular invasion, and regional nodal metastases were associated with increasing T stage (P = 0.003).

T1 gastric cancer is associated with a substantial risk (17%) of regional LN metastasis, when pathologically staged following surgical resection and D2 lymphadenectomy. Clinically staged N+ disease by EUS was not significantly associated with pathologically staged N+ disease in these patients.

Understanding the extent of tumor spread to local lymph nodes is critical to managing early-stage gastric cancer. Recently, fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green has been used to identify and characterize sentinel lymph nodes during gastric cancer surgery, but no published guidelines exist. We sought to identify areas of consensus among international experts in the use of fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green for mapping sentinel lymph nodes during gastric-cancer surgery.

In this 2-round, online Delphi survey, 27 international experts voted on 79 statements pertaining to patient preparation and contraindications to fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green during gastric cancer surgery; indications; technical aspects; advantages/disadvantages and limitations; and training and research. Methodological steps were adopted during survey design to minimize bias.

Consensus was reached on 61 of 79 statements, including giving single injections of indocyanine green into each of the 4 quadrants peritumorally, administering indocyanine green on the same day as surgery, injecting a total of 1 to 5 mL of 5 mg/mL indocyanine green, injecting endoscopically into submucosa, and repeating indocyanine green injections a second time if sentinel lymph node visualization remains inadequate. Consensus also was reached that fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green is an acceptable single-agent modality for sentinel lymph node identification and that the sentinel lymph node basin method is preferred. However, sentinel lymph node dissection should be limited to T1 gastric cancer and tumors ≤4 cm in diameter, and further research is necessary to optimize the technique and render fluorescence-guided sentinel lymph nodes dissection acceptable for routine clinical use.

Although considerable consensus was achieved, further research is necessary before this technology should be used in routine practice.

The treatment of gastric cancer mainly depends on radical gastrectomy. Determination of appropriate surgical margins and adequate lymph node (LN) resection are two major surgical steps that directly correlate with prognosis in gastric cancer. Due to the expanding use of minimally invasive procedures, it is no longer possible to locate tumors and LNs through touch. As an alternative, tracers have begun to enter the field due to their capacities for intraoperative visualization. Herein, we summarize the application of contemporary tracers in gastric cancer surgery, including isosulfan blue, methylene blue, patent blue, indocyanine green, carbon particles, and radioactive tracers. Their mechanisms, administration methods, detection efficiency, and challenges, as well as perspectives on them, are also outlined.

Early gastric cancer (EGC) is an invasive carcinoma involving only the stomach mucosa or submucosa, independently of lymph node status. EGC represents over 50% of cases in Japan and in South Korea, whereas it accounts only for approximately 20% of all newly diagnosed gastric cancers in Western countries. The main classification systems of EGC are the Vienna histopathologic classification and the Paris endoscopic classification of polypoid and non-polypoid lesions. A careful endoscopic assessment is fundamental to establish the best treatment of EGC. Generally, EGCs are curable if the lesion is completely removed by endoscopic resection or surgery. Some types of EGC can be resected endoscopically; for others the most appropriate treatment is surgical resection and D2 lymphadenectomy, especially in Western countries. The favorable oncological prognosis, the extended lymphadenectomy and the reconstruction of the intestinal continuity that excludes the duodenum make the prophylactic cholecystectomy mandatory to avoid the onset of biliary complications.

The effects of various gastrectomy procedures on the patient's quality of life (QOL) are not well understood. Thus, this nationwide multi-institutional cross-sectional study using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45 (PGSAS-45), a well-established questionnaire designed to clarify the severity and characteristics of the postgastrectomy syndrome, was conducted.

To compare the effects of six main gastrectomy procedures on the postoperative QOL.

Eligible questionnaires retrieved from 2368 patients who underwent either of six gastrectomy procedures [total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (TGRY; n = 393), proximal gastrectomy (PG; n = 193), distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (DGRY; n = 475), distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I reconstruction (DGBI; n = 909), pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG; n = 313), and local resection of the stomach (LR; n = 85)] were analyzed. Among the 19 main outcome measures of PGSAS-45, the severity and characteristics of postgastrectomy syndrome were compared for the aforementioned six gastrectomy procedures using analysis of means.

TGRY and PG significantly impaired the QOL of postoperative patients. Postoperative QOL was excellent in LR (cardia and pylorus were preserved with minimal resection). In procedures removing the distal stomach, diarrhea subscale (SS) and dumping SS were less frequent in PPG than in DGBI and DGRY. However, there was no difference in the postoperative QOL between DGBI and DGRY. The most noticeable adverse effects caused by gastrectomy were meal-related distress SS, dissatisfaction at the meal, and weight loss, with significant differences among the surgical procedures.

Postoperative QOL greatly differed among six gastrectomy procedures. The severity and characteristics of postgastrectomy syndrome should be considered to select gastrectomy procedures, overcome surgical shortcomings, and enhance postoperative care.

It has previously been suggested that postgastrectomy syndrome (PGS) is more severe in patients after surgery for advanced gastric cancer than in patients with early gastric cancer. Using the postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale-45 (PGSAS-45), the present study aimed to determine whether PGS for postgastrectomy patients, in Kanazawa Medical University Hospital, with advanced gastric cancer was more severe than for patients with early gastric cancer. A questionnaire survey was conducted using PGSAS-45 for curative gastric cancer gastrectomy cases at Kanazawa Medical University Hospital. The questionnaire data were combined with patient background data, anonymized and moved to an unlinked file for patient privacy. Using this dataset, non-recurrent cases of distal partial gastrectomy were extracted and divided into two groups, stage IA or IB patients (group E), and stage IIA or higher (group A). The main outcome measures (MOMs) of PGSAS-45 were compared between the two groups. The participants in the present study included 35 cases in group E and 22 cases in group A. The results of a univariate analysis to compare the MOMs between the two groups showed that only the dumping subscale was significantly different in group A and was judged to be caused by the underlying bias of the background factor. There were no MOMs with significant differences in the pathological stage based on multiple regression analyses. In cases of distal partial gastrectomy, the PGS and quality of life (QoL) of patients following advanced gastric cancer surgery were similar to those of patients with early gastric cancer. The standardized treatment for advanced gastric cancer did not induce notable postoperative failures, and QoL was not impaired. In contrast, for early-stage gastric cancer cases, the present study suggests that it is necessary to distinguish metastasis-negative cases to indicate an appropriate, function-preserving curative gastrectomy.

The gravest prognostic factor in early gastric cancer is lymph-node metastasis, with an incidence of about 10% overall. About two-thirds of early gastric cancer patients can be diagnosed as node-negative prior to treatment based on clinic-pathological data. Thus, the tumor can be resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection. In the remaining third, surgical resection is necessary because of the possibility of nodal metastasis. Nevertheless, almost all patients can be cured by gastrectomy with D1+ lymph-node dissection. Laparoscopic or robotic gastrectomy has become widespread in East Asia because perioperative and oncological safety are similar to open surgery. However, after D1+ gastrectomy, functional symptoms may still result. Physicians must strive to minimize post-gastrectomy symptoms and optimize long-term quality of life after this operation. Depending on the location and size of the primary lesion, preservation of the pylorus or cardia should be considered. In addition, the extent of lymph-node dissection can be individualized, and significant gastric-volume preservation can be achieved if sentinel node biopsy is used to distinguish node-negative patients. Though the surgical treatment for early gastric cancer may be less radical than in the past, the operative method itself seems to be still in transition.