Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, primarily driven by KIT or PDGFRA mutations. Programmed cell death (PCD), including apoptosis, autophagy, and ferroptosis, plays a crucial role in GIST pathogenesis, progression, and treatment response. Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) have emerged as key regulators of PCD pathways, influencing GIST proliferation, metastasis, and drug resistance, particularly in response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib. Apoptosis suppression is strongly associated with poor prognosis, while autophagy contributes to tumor dormancy and TKI resistance. Ferroptosis, a novel iron-dependent cell death pathway, represents a promising therapeutic target. Recent evidence suggests that ncRNAs modulate these PCD pathways through interactions with key molecular regulators such as miR-494, miR-30a, and lncRNAs, which affect signaling networks including PI3K/AKT, MAPK, and mTOR. Furthermore, ncRNAs have mediated secondary resistance to imatinib by promoting autophagic flux and altering ferroptosis sensitivity. Understanding the molecular interplay between ncRNAs and PCD in GIST provides novel insights into disease mechanisms and offers potential therapeutic strategies to overcome drug resistance. Targeting ncRNA-mediated regulation of apoptosis, autophagy, and ferroptosis may enhance treatment efficacy and improve patient outcomes. Future research should focus on elucidating the mechanistic roles of ncRNAs in PCD pathways to develop innovative diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for GIST.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the preferred targeted therapy for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Ripretinib, the first tyrosine kinase switch control inhibitor, has not yet been extensively studied for long-term safety in large populations. This study evaluates Ripretinib-related adverse events (AEs) in real-world applications by analyzing data from the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

To quantify signals of AEs, we employed several disproportionality analyses: the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS).

In the FAERS database, out of 7,064,646 reports, 3,161 were identified as related to Ripretinib AEs, with 438 significant disproportionality in preferred terms. The most common adverse reactions were tiredness, hair loss, nausea, constipation, diarrhea, loss of appetite, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, and vomiting. These reactions align with the medication instructions and reports from corresponding clinical trials. Notably, the label includes unexpected and significant AEs such as "hepatic neoplasm", "hair texture abnormal", "metastases to liver" and "red blood cell count decreased". The median onset time for Ripretinib-related AEs was 99 days, with an interquartile range of 27-245 days. Most cases (26.74%, n = 165) occurred within the first month of Ripretinib administration.

Our findings align with clinical observations. We identified novel and unexpected AEs signatures of Ripretinib, indicating that prospective clinical studies are necessary to confirm these findings and clarify their implications. These results could provide valuable evidence to guide further safety studies on Ripretinib.

This review aims to outline the current understanding of the molecular drivers and treatment paradigms of gastrointestinal stromal tumors, with a focus on recent developments in treatment in the advanced disease setting.

There have been recent advancements in our understanding of the molecular biology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors, including the identification of new genetic drivers and complex resistance mechanisms. We review the most recent findings in these areas, focusing on how new research insights are reshaping treatment strategies. Recent advancements in our understanding of the biology and treatment of GIST are paving the way for more personalized and effective therapeutic options. As knowledge of rare molecular subtypes, resistance mechanisms, and novel genomic techniques grows, new approaches are emerging in an effort to improve patient outcomes.

British Sarcoma Group guidelines for the management of GIST were initially informed by those published by the European Society of Clinical Oncology. This update was written by a group of experts to includes a discussion of the highlight improvements in our knowledge of the disease and recent treatment developments. The guidelines include sections on Incidence, Aetiology, Diagnosis, including risk assessment, Treatment and Follow-up.

A careful review of the literature was performed to ensure that wherever possible recommendations are supported by the results of clinical trials or substantive retrospective reports. Areas of uncertainty are indicated appropriately.

Guidelines represent a consensus view of current best clinical practice. Where appropriate, key recommendations are given and the levels of evidence and strength of recommendation gradings are those used by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO).

Less than 5% of GI stromal tumors (GISTs) are driven by the loss of the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) complex, resulting in a pervasive DNA hypermethylation pattern that leads to unique clinical features. Advanced SDH-deficient GISTs are usually treated with the same therapies targeting KIT and PDGFRA receptors as those used in metastatic GIST. However, these treatments display less activity in the absence of alternative therapeutic options. Therefore, it is critical to identify novel actionable alterations in SDH-deficient GIST.

We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of patients with SDH-deficient GIST together with next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis from their respective tumor samples to identify mutations and copy number alterations and chromosomal alterations. NGS-tailored treatment was implemented whenever possible.

Seventeen tumor samples from 14 patients with SDH-deficient GIST underwent NGS. Mutational load was low, although three patients (21%) displayed molecular events in relapse samples leading to PI3K/mTOR pathway hyperactivation. mTOR inhibition with everolimus obtained a sustained tumor response in a heavily pretreated patient. Other alterations, largely present in late-stage patients, uncovered genes involved in cell cycle regulation, telomere maintenance, and DNA damage repair. Chromosomal arm-level alterations differed from the canonical cytogenetic progression in KIT/PDGFRA-mutant GIST.

This molecular landscape of SDH-deficient GIST uncovers novel molecular alterations, mostly in relapse and/or previously pretreated patients. The identification of genetic events leading to PI3K/mTOR dysregulation together with the remarkable activity of everolimus in one patient showcases the clinical relevance of this pathway, validates the utility of NGS in this population, and poses everolimus as a novel therapeutic alternative. Several other alterations were found at the genetic and genomic levels, underscoring novel biological processes likely involved during tumor evolution.

The purpose of this study was to determine if dual-energy CT (DECT) vital iodine tumor burden (ViTB), a direct assessment of tumor vascularity, allows reliable response assessment in patients with GIST compared to established CT criteria such as RECIST1.1 and modified Choi (mChoi). From 03/2014 to 12/2019, 138 patients (64 years [32-94 years]) with biopsy proven GIST were entered in this prospective, multi-center trial. All patients were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and underwent pre-treatment and follow-up DECT examinations for a minimum of 24 months. Response assessment was performed according to RECIST1.1, mChoi, vascular tumor burden (VTB) and DECT ViTB. A change in therapy management could be because of imaging (RECIST1.1 or mChoi) and/or clinical progression. The DECT ViTB criteria had the highest discrimination ability for progression-free survival (PFS) of all criteria in both first line and second line and thereafter treatment, and was significantly superior to RECIST1.1 and mChoi (p < .034). Both, the mChoi and DECT ViTB criteria demonstrated a significantly early median time-to-progression (both delta 2.5 months; both p < .036). Multivariable analysis revealed 6 variables associated with shorter overall survival: secondary mutation (HR = 4.62), polymetastatic disease (HR = 3.02), metastatic second line and thereafter treatment (HR = 2.33), shorter PFS determined by the DECT ViTB criteria (HR = 1.72), multiple organ metastases (HR = 1.51) and lower age (HR = 1.04). DECT ViTB is a reliable response criteria and provides additional value for assessing TKI treatment in GIST patients. A significant superior response discrimination ability for median PFS was observed, including non-responders at first follow-up and patients developing resistance while on therapy.

Imatinib therapy is the gold standard for the treatment of unresectable and metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, few studies have reported the long-term outcomes of the treatment.

Seventy patients who underwent imatinib therapy for unresectable and metastatic GISTs were enrolled between 2001 and 2009, and follow-up data were collected until October 2023. One hundred and sixty-eight months had passed since the final enrollment. The outcome measures were patient survival and the status of GIST and imatinib therapy. The cumulative incidence of disease progression (PD) and the chronological changes in PD hazard rate (HR) were also analyzed.

The 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year overall survival rates were 64.3%, 30.0%, 16.8%, and 12.2%, respectively. Sixty of the 70 enrolled patients died before the data cutoff date: 47 (78.3%) patients died of GIST progression while the remaining 13 (21.7%) died of diseases other than GISTs. The cumulative incidence of PD logarithmically increased, and PD continued even after 10 years of treatment. PD HR decreased over time to reach the lowest value at 9.6 years after the initiation of treatment (HR 0.00027; 95% CI 0.00007-0.00174) and after that formed a small peak at 13 years (HR 0.00144; 95% CI 0.00043-0.00436).

Imatinib therapy showed high clinical efficacy in terms of long-term survival in GIST patients. However, patients undergoing imatinib therapy were at continuous risk of PD even after the 10-year treatment. Long-term treatment and follow-up beyond 10 years are necessary for unresectable and metastatic GIST patients.

For gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), neoadjuvant imatinib is most often reserved for tumors near the gastroesophageal junction, multivisceral involvement, or limited metastatic disease. Whether localized gastric GISTs benefit from neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remains unknown. We sought to examine factors associated with NAT utilization for localized gastric GISTs and evaluate implications on survival.

The National Cancer Database identified patients with localized gastric GISTs treated with NAT (2010-2020), excluding tumors extending beyond the gastric wall, located in the cardia, or with metastatic disease. Multivariable logistic regression assessed characteristics of NAT use. After 1:1 propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression assessed overall survival (OS).

Of 7203 patients, 762 (10.6%) received NAT followed by resection. On multivariable analysis, increasing tumor size was associated with NAT use (<2.0 cm vs 2.0-5.0 cm [odds ratio {OR}, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.19-3.47; P = .010] vs >5 cm [OR, 16.87; 95% CI, 10.02-28.40; P < .001]). After propensity score matching, 1506 patients remained. Median OS for NAT was 46.0 months vs 43.0 months for resection (P = .059), which was independently predictive of improved survival on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-0.99; P = .041). Subgroup analysis by tumor size showed no survival differences for tumors <2.0 cm or from 2.0 to 5.0 cm. Median OS was higher for tumors > 5.0 cm treated with NAT (NAT, 45.4 months [IQR, 29.5-65.9] vs upfront resection, 42.3 months [IQR 26.9-62.8]) and associated with improved survival on multivariable analysis (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99; P = .040).

Although patients who received NAT had improved survival, this was primarily due to tumors >5.0 cm. Expanding NAT selection criteria to include localized gastric GISTs >5.0 cm may improve outcomes and warrants investigation through clinical trials.

Imatinib (IMA) has received approval as the primary treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Nonetheless, approximately half of the patients with advanced GIST show disease advancement following IMA treatment. Presently, the efficacy of secondary and tertiary medications in addressing various GIST secondary mutations is somewhat restricted. Consequently, there is a significant medical demand for the creation of kinase inhibitors that extensively block secondary drug-resistant mutations in advanced GIST. Ripretinib (RPT) is a new, switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitors that can suppress different mutations of KIT and PDGFRA via a dual mechanism of action.

To investigate the literature on RPT to assess an effective, safe, and successful treatment strategy against advanced GIST.

The present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were screened from January 1, 2003 to May 1, 2024.

A total of 4 studies were included, with a total of 507 patients enrolled. The objective response rate (ORR) of the RPT-treated advanced GIST was 17% (95%CI: 0.11-0.27), while the disease control rate (DCR) was 66% (95%CI: 0.59-0.73). The overall occurrence of adverse events with varying degrees was 97% (95%CI: 0.93-1), whereas that of grade ≥ 3 adverse reactions was 42% (95%CI: 0.28-0.63). The sensitivity analysis revealed that omitting some studies did not yield statistically notable variances in the aggregate data regarding the ORR, DCR, and the occurrence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher. The publication bias was absent because no significant asymmetry was observed in Begg's funnel plot in all studies.

RPT has favorable efficacy profiles in GIST patients, but the adverse reactions are obvious, and patient management needs to be strengthened to achieve better safety and tolerability.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are mesenchymal tumours that originate from the interstitial cells of Cajal. GISTs are mainly driven by gain-of-function mutations in receptor tyrosine kinase or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha. Surgical resection is the only curative treatment for localized tumours and all currently approved medical GIST treatments are based on orally available tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Recent discoveries in the molecular and clinical features of GISTs have greatly impacted GIST management. Due to the provincially rather than nationally administered Canadian healthcare system, there have been inconsistencies in the treatment of GISTs across the country. Therefore, guidance on the latest knowledge, clinical management and treatment of GIST is needed to standardize the approach to GIST management nationwide. To establish pan-Canadian guidance, provide up-to-date data and harmonize the clinical practice of GIST management in high- and low-throughput centres across Canada; a panel of 20 physicians with extensive clinical experience in GIST management reviewed relevant literature. This included radiologists, pathologists, interventional radiologists, surgeons and medical oncologists across Canada. The structured literature focused on seven key domains: molecular profiling, radiological techniques/reporting, targeted localized therapy, intricacies of systemic treatments, emerging tests, multidisciplinary care and patient advocacy. This literature review, along with clinical expertise and opinion, was used to develop this concise and clinically relevant consensus paper to harmonize the knowledge and clinical practice on GIST management across Canada. The content presented here will help guide healthcare providers, especially in Canada, in terms of approaching and managing GIST.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare in young people and are often detected after becoming symptomatic or at an advanced stage. Herein, we report a case of complete reduction surgery for a substantially large malignant gastric GIST with multiple liver metastases in a young woman who successfully resulted in R0 surgery.

An 18-year-old woman presented to our hospital with anorexia and vomiting, and was diagnosed with a 17 cm gastric GIST with transverse colon invasion and multiple liver metastases. Due to being considered unresectable, tyrosine and multi-kinase inhibitor therapy were administered up to the fourth line yielding no response. After careful discussion at a multidisciplinary team conference, pancreatoduodenectomy or distal gastrectomy, transverse colectomy, and resection of the liver metastases were planned. Consequently, distal gastrectomy, transverse colectomy, resection of the liver metastases, and incidental peritoneal metastases were performed. Although the primary goal of the surgery was to reduce the volume of the tumor as much as possible, the results revealed that the complete removal of all detectable tumors was achieved. No recurrence was observed after surgery for 27 months with long-term adjuvant imatinib therapy.

Even for highly advanced GISTs, aggressive surgery followed by adjuvant drug therapy may prolong survival in young patients.

Imatinib resistance in GI stromal tumors (GISTs) is primarily caused by secondary KIT mutations, and clonal heterogeneity of these secondary mutations represents a major treatment obstacle. KIT inhibitors used after imatinib have clinical activity, albeit with limited benefit. Ripretinib is a potent inhibitor of secondary KIT mutations in the activation loop (AL). However, clinical benefit in fourth line remains limited and the molecular mechanisms of ripretinib resistance are largely unknown.

Progressing lesions of 25 patients with GISTs refractory to ripretinib were sequenced for KIT resistance mutations. Resistant genotypes were validated and characterized using novel cell line models and in silico modeling.

GISTs progressing on ripretinib were enriched for secondary mutations in the ATP-binding pocket (AP), which frequently occur in cis with preexisting AL mutations, resulting in highly resistant AP/AL genotypes. AP/AL mutations were rarely observed in a cohort of progressing GIST samples from the preripretinib era but represented 50% of secondary KIT mutations in patients with tumors resistant to ripretinib. In GIST cell lines harboring secondary KIT AL mutations, the sole genomic escape mechanisms during ripretinib drug selection were AP/AL mutations. Ripretinib and sunitinib synergize against mixed clones with secondary AP or AL mutants but do not suppress clones with AP/AL genotypes.

Our findings underscore that KIT remains the central oncogenic driver even in late lines of GIST therapy. KIT-inhibitor combinations may suppress resistance because of secondary KIT mutations. However, the emergence of KIT AP/AL mutations after ripretinib treatment calls for new strategies in the development of next-generation KIT inhibitors.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare cancer treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib mesylate or sunitinib malate. In general, in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), access to these treatments is limited.

To describe the demographic characteristics, treatment duration, and survival of patients with GIST in LMICs treated with imatinib and sunitinib through The Max Foundation programs.

This retrospective database cohort analysis included patients in 2 access programs administered by The Max Foundation: the Glivec International Patient Assistance Program (GIPAP), from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2016, and the Max Access Solutions (MAS) program, January 1, 2017, to October 12, 2020. Sixty-six countries in which The Max Foundation facilitates access to imatinib and sunitinib were included. Participants consisted of patients with approved indications for imatinib, including adjuvant therapy in high-risk GIST by pathologic evaluation of resected tumor or biopsy-proven unresectable or metastatic GIST. All patients were reported to have tumors positive for CD117(c-kit) by treating physicians. A total of 9866 patients received treatment for metastatic and/or unresectable disease; 2100 received adjuvant imatinib; 49 received imatinib from another source and were only included in the sunitinib analysis; and 53 received both imatinib and sunitinib through The Max Foundation programs. Data were analyzed from October 13, 2020, to January 30, 2024.

Demographic and clinical information was reported by treating physicians. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS). An imputation-based informed censoring model estimated events for patients lost to follow-up after treatment with adjuvant imatinib. Patients who were lost to follow-up with metastatic or unresectable disease were presumed deceased.

A total of 12 015 unique patients were included in the analysis (6890 male [57.6%]; median age, 54 [range, 0-100] years). Of these, 2100 patients were treated with imatinib in the adjuvant setting (median age, 54 [range 8-88] years) and 9866 were treated with imatinib for metastatic or unresectable disease (median age, 55 [range, 0-100] years). Male patients comprised 5867 of 9866 patients (59.5%) with metastatic or unresectable disease and 1023 of 2100 patients (48.7%) receiving adjuvant therapy. The median OS with imatinib for unresectable or metastatic disease was 5.8 (95% CI, 5.6-6.1) years, and the median TTD was 4.2 (95% CI, 4.1-4.4) years. The median OS with sunitinib for patients with metastatic or unresectable GIST was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.5-2.5) years; the median TTD was 1.5 (95% CI, 1.0-2.1) years. The 10-year OS rate in the adjuvant setting was 73.8% (95% CI, 67.2%-81.1%).

In this cohort study of patients with GIST who were predominantly from LMICs and received orally administered therapy through the GIPAP or MAS programs, outcomes were similar to those observed in high-resource countries. These findings underscore the feasibility and relevance of administering oral anticancer therapy to a molecularly defined population in LMICs, addressing a critical gap in cancer care.

Improvement of patient care is associated with increasing publication numbers in biomedical research. However, such increasing numbers of publications make it challenging for physicians and scientists to screen and process the literature of their respective fields. In this study, we present a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the evolution of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) research, analyzing the current state of the field and identifying key open questions going beyond the recent advantages for future studies to assess.

Using the Web of Science Core Collection, 5040 GIST-associated publications in the years 1984-2022 were identified and analyzed regarding key bibliometric variables using the Bibliometrix R package and VOSviewer software.

GIST-associated publication numbers substantially increased over time, accentuated from year 2000 onwards, and being characterized by multinational collaborations. The main topic clusters comprise surgical management, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) development/treatment, diagnostic workup, and molecular pathophysiology. Within all main topic clusters, a significant progress is reflected by the literature over the years. This progress ranges from conventional open surgical techniques over minimally invasive, including robotic and endoscopic, resection techniques to increasing identification of specific functional genetic aberrations sensitizing for newly developed TKIs being extensively investigated in clinical studies and implemented in GIST treatment guidelines. However, especially in locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic disease stages, surgery-related questions and certain specific questions concerning (further-line) TKI treatment resistance were infrequently addressed.

Increasing GIST-related publication numbers reflect a continuous progress in the major topic clusters of the GIST research field. Especially in advanced disease stages, questions related to the interplay between surgical approaches and TKI treatment sensitivity should be addressed in future studies.

The heterogeneous nature of tumors presents a considerable obstacle in addressing imatinib resistance in advanced cases of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). To address this issue, we conducted single-cell RNA-sequencing in primary tumors as well as peritoneal and liver metastases from patients diagnosed with locally advanced or advanced GIST. Single-cell transcriptomic signatures of tumor microenvironment (TME) were analyzed. Immunohistochemistry and multiplex immunofluorescence staining were used to further validate it. This analysis revealed unique tumor evolutionary patterns, transcriptome features, dynamic cell-state changes, and different metabolic reprogramming. The findings indicate that in imatinib-resistant TME, tumor cells with activated immune and cytokine-mediated immune responses interacted with a higher proportion of Treg cells via the TIGIT-NECTIN2 axis. Future immunotherapeutic strategies targeting Treg may provide new directions for the treatment of imatinib-resistant patients. In addition, IDO1+ dendritic cells (DC) were highly enriched in imatinib-resistant TME, interacting with various myeloid cells via the BTLA-TNFRSF14 axis, while the interaction was not significant in imatinib-sensitive TME. Our study highlights the transcriptional heterogeneity and distinct immunosuppressive microenvironment of advanced GIST, which provides novel therapeutic strategies and innovative immunotherapeutic agents for imatinib resistance.

Correlations between plasma concentrations of imatinib and sunitinib with efficacy and toxicity have been established. It is crucial to develop a sensitive and precise method for determining the plasma concentrations of imatinib and sunitinib, along with their active metabolites, to facilitate therapeutic drug monitoring and individualized therapy. Plasma samples were separated on an Agilent ZORBAX SB-C18 chromatographic column using gradient elution. Quantification was performed using a mass spectrometer equipped with electrospray ionization in multiple reaction monitoring. The analysis time was 18 min per run, with all analytes and internal standards eluting within 8 min. The calibration range was 25-4000 ng/mL for imatinib, 5-800 ng/mL for N-desmethyl imatinib (CGP74588), and 2.5-400 ng/mL for sunitinib and N-desethyl sunitinib (SU12662). Intra- and inter-assay precision were both below 15%, and accuracy ranged between 90.0% and 101.9%. The method was successfully applied to determine blood samples from 120 patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors who received imatinib (n = 115) and sunitinib (n = 5). It has been validated as linear, accurate, precise, and robust, making it suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring of imatinib and sunitinib in routine clinical practice.

Approximately 90% of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are driven by activating mutations in receptor tyrosine-kinases KIT or PDGFRA. Despite the outstanding results of first-line imatinib in advanced GIST, resistance ultimately occurs mainly through secondary mutations in KIT/PDGFRA. Other tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with a broader spectrum of activity against these mutations are approved after imatinib failure. However, response rates and progression-free survival are drastically lower compared to imatinib. Notably, imatinib also triggers early tolerance adaptation mechanisms, which precede the occurrence of secondary mutations.

In this review, we outline the current landscape of KIT inhibitors, discuss the novel agents, and present additional biological pathways that may be therapeutically exploitable.

The development of broad-spectrum and highly selective TKIs able to induce a sustained KIT/PDGFRA inhibition is the pillar of preclinical and clinical investigation in GIST. However, it is now recognized that the situation is more intricate, with various factors interacting with KIT and PDGFRA, playing a crucial role in the response and resistance to treatments. Future strategies in the management of advanced GIST should integrate driver inhibition with the blockade of other molecules to enhance cell death and establish enduring responses in patients.

Anti-PD-1 antibodies and BRAK/MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) reduce the risk of recurrence for patients with resected stage III melanoma. BRAFV600-mutated (BRAFmut) melanoma patients who recur with isolated disease following adjuvant therapy may be suitable for 'second adjuvant' treatment after local therapy. We sought to examine the efficacy and safety of 'second adjuvant' BRAF/MEKi.

Patients with BRAFmut melanoma treated with adjuvant PD-1 based immunotherapy who recurred, underwent definitive local therapy and were then treated with adjuvant BRAF/MEKi were identified retrospectively from 13 centres (second adjuvant group). Demographics, disease and treatment characteristics and outcome data were examined. Outcomes were compared to BRAFmut patients who did not receive 'second adjuvant' therapy (no second adjuvant group).

73 patients were included; 61 who received 'second adjuvant' therapy and 12 who did not. Most initially recurred on PD-1 therapy (66%). There were no differences in characteristics between groups. 92% of second adjuvant group received dabrafenib and trametinib and median duration of therapy was 11.8 months (0.4, 34.5). 72% required dose adjustments, 23% had grade 3 + toxicity and 38% permanently discontinued drug due to toxicity. After median 26.1 months (1.9, 56.3) follow-up, recurrence-free survival (RFS) was improved in second adjuvant group versus no second adjuvant group (median 30.8 vs 4 months, HR 0.35; p = 0.014), largely driven by a delay in early recurrence, with no difference in overall survival (p = 0.59).

This is the first study examining outcomes of 'second adjuvant' targeted therapy for melanoma, after failure of adjuvant PD-1 based immunotherapy. Data suggest a short-term improvement in RFS, but at the cost of toxicity. Alternative strategies and more data on sequencing adjuvant therapies are required to improve outcomes.

Ripretinib, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) resistant to standard therapies, was assessed in the United Kingdom (UK) within an Expanded Access Program (EAP). A retrospective review of patients treated between January 2020 and October 2021 within the ripretinib EAP in our Institution was conducted. Clinician-documented and mRECIST 1.1 assessments were collected. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD). Treatment beyond progression (TBP), overall survival (OS), objective response rates and safety data were also analyzed. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed. All analyses were performed with R software. Overall, forty-five patients were included. After a median follow-up of 24.2 (95% CI 19.7-29.7) months, the median PFS of the group receiving 150 mg ripretinib once daily (OD) was 7.9 (95% CI 5.6-19.3) months. In the cohort of 22 patients with dose escalation upon tumor progression to 150 mg ripretinib twice daily (BD), the median PFS from BD was 5.4 (95% CI 2.8-9.3) months. Overall, median PFS and OS values for patients on ripretinib were 9.7 (95% CI 8.3-18.1) and 14.0 (95% CI 9.9-NA) months, respectively. TTD was similar to PFS. TBP was observed in about one third of all patients. Objective responses to ripretinib OD and BD treatments were observed in 16.7% and 10.0% of the patients, respectively. No new safety signals were identified. In conclusion, patients with advanced GIST receiving ripretinib in the UK within the EAP reported prolonged benefits, in line with the recent phase III clinical trials.

To analyze the outcome in patients who have undergone multivisceral resection (MVR) for locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), and identify the risk factors for tumor recurrence and postoperative morbidity. Sixty-four patients who operated for locally advanced GISTs with MVR in PPeking University Cancer Hospital Sarcoma Center (PUCHSC) between 2013 and 2021 were identified. Clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical outcomes, recurrence, and 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival were evaluated. The mean age of the patients was 60 years. Mean tumor size was 11.1 cm. Complete resection was achieved in all patients. The estimated 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival were 86.6% and 90.0%, respectively. Independent factor of recurrence following surgery was mitotic count on multivariate analysis. Overall postoperative morbidity was 53.1% (n = 34). Severe morbidity was 21.9% (n = 14). The most common severe complication was clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (n = 12, 18.8%), followed by anastomotic leakage (n = 4, 6.3%) and Intraabdominal abscess (n = 4, 6.3%). Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative imatinib therapy could reduce overall morbidity. Long operation time, combined colectomy and pancreatectomy were independent risk factors for postoperative severe morbidity. Compared to partial pancreatectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) was significantly increased the incidence of severe morbidity. In conclusion, compared to systemic therapy alone, the outcome of locally advanced GISTs after MVR was more favorable. Despite the high overall morbidity, the postoperative severe morbidity and mortality of MVR were acceptable. Preoperative imatinib therapy should be recommended whenever possible. Combined pancreatectomy and colectomy are associated with significant postoperative severe morbidities. PD should be thoroughly discussed and be subject to MDT approach before surgery.

The liver is the most common site of metastasis from gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). We aimed to evaluate imatinib (IM) combined with hepatic resection (HR) or other local treatments such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), compared to IM monotherapy in long-term survival benefits in patients suffering from GIST liver metastases.

Our research encompassed 238 patients diagnosed with liver metastases of GISTs from January 2002 to April 2022 at the XXX Hospital of XXX University. The oncological outcomes of concern included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and liver-specific PFS.

Of all 238 patients, 126 were treated with IM alone (IM group), 81 with IM combined with HR (IM+HR group), and 31 with IM combined with RFA/TACE (IM+RFA/TACE group). The median follow-up time was 44.83 months. The median OS in the IM group was 132.60 months and was not reached in either the IM+HR group or the IM+RFA/TACE group. The 10-year OS rate in the IM+HR group was significantly superior to the IM group and the IM+RFA/TACE group (91.9% vs. 61.1% vs. 55.2%, respectively, P=0.015), and the liver-specific PFS (P=0.642) and PFS (P=0.369) in the three groups showed a beneficial trend in the combined treatment group. Multivariate analyses showed that age ≤60 years (HR 0.280, P<0.001) and IM+HR (HR 0.361, P=0.047) were independently associated with better OS. Achieving no evidence of disease (NED) through surgical intervention was independently correlated with enhanced OS (HR 0.099, P=0.034), liver-specific PFS (HR 0.388, P=0.014), and PFS (HR 0.402, P=0.004).

In patients with GIST liver metastases, IM combined with HR might improve OS in selected patients compared with IM alone and IM combined with RFA/TACE. Achieving NED status with surgical treatment of patients results in significant prolonging of OS, liver-specific PFS and PFS.

Recent prospective trials for esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) are encouraging. This manuscript reviews selected recently published studies. Not surprisingly, immunotherapy dominates the current clinical trial landscape. However, targeted biologic therapies and standard chemotherapy remain critical to the treatment of gastric and esophageal cancer while imatinib remains the backbone for advanced or metastatic GISTs. For all three cancers, surgical resection remains important when intent of treatment is potential cure.

This study aims to (1) investigate the prevalence of anxiety, depression and severe fear of cancer recurrence or progression in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients treated in a curative or palliative setting, (2) compare their prevalence with a norm population, (3) identify factors associated with anxiety, depression and severe fear, and (4) study the impact of these psychological symptoms on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

In a cross-sectional study, GIST patients completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Cancer Worry Scale, and EORTC QLQ-C30.

Of the 328 patients, 15% reported anxiety, 13% depression, and 43% had severe fear. Anxiety and depression levels were comparable between the norm population and patients in the curative setting, but significantly higher for patients in the palliative setting. Having other psychological symptoms was associated with anxiety, while current TKI treatment and anxiety were associated with depression. Severe fear was associated with age, female sex, palliative treatment setting, anxiety, and GIST-related concerns.

GIST patients treated in a palliative setting are more prone to experience psychological symptoms, which can significantly impair their HRQoL. These symptoms deserve more attention in clinical practice, in which regular screening can be helpful, and appropriate interventions should be offered.

In the INTRIGUE trial, ripretinib showed no significant difference versus sunitinib in progression-free survival for patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) previously treated with imatinib. We compared the impact of these treatments on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Patients were randomised 1:1 to once-daily ripretinib 150 mg or once-daily sunitinib 50 mg (4 weeks on/2 weeks off). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire at day (D)1, and D29 of all cycles until treatment discontinuation. Change from baseline was calculated. Time without symptoms or toxicity (TWiST) was estimated as the mean number of days without progression, death, or grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events per patient over 1 year of follow-up.

Questionnaire completion at baseline was 88.1% (199/226) for ripretinib and 87.7% (199/227) for sunitinib and remained high for enrolled patients throughout treatment. Patients receiving sunitinib demonstrated within-cycle variation in self-reported HRQoL, corresponding to the on/off dosing regimen. Patients receiving ripretinib reported better HRQoL at D29 assessments than patients receiving sunitinib on all scales except constipation. HRQoL was similar between treatments at D1 assessments, following 2 weeks without treatment for sunitinib patients. TWiST was greater for ripretinib patients (173 versus 126 days).

Patients receiving ripretinib experienced better HRQoL than patients receiving sunitinib during the dosing period and similar HRQoL to patients who had not received sunitinib for 2 weeks for all QLQ-C30 domains except constipation. Ripretinib may provide clinically meaningful benefit to patients with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib.

c-Kit is a type III receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) that has an essential role in various biological functions including gametogenesis, melanogenesis, hematopoiesis, cell survival, and apoptosis. c-KIT aberrations, either overexpression or loss-of-function mutations, have been implicated in the pathogenesis and development of many cancers, including gastrointestinal stromal tumors, mastocytosis, acute myeloid leukemia, breast, thyroid, and colorectal cancer, making c-KIT an attractive molecular target for the treatment of cancers. Therefore, a lot of effort has been put into investigating the utility of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the management of c-KIT mutated tumors. This review of the literature illustrates the role of c-KIT mutations in many cancers, aiming to provide insights into the role of TKIs as a therapeutic option for cancer patients with c-KIT aberrations. In conclusion, c-KIT is implicated in different types of cancer, and it could be a successful molecular target; however, proper detection of the underlying mutation type is required before starting the appropriate personalized therapy.

Targeted therapy (TT) has revolutionized cancer treatment, successfully applied in various settings. Adjuvant TT in resected early-stage gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and breast cancer has led to practice-changing achievements. In particular, standard treatments include BRAF inhibitors for melanoma, osimertinib for NSCLC, hormone therapy or HER2 TT for breast cancer, and imatinib for GIST. Despite the undeniable benefit derived from adjuvant TT, the optimal duration of TT and the appropriate managing of the relapse remain open questions. Furthermore, neoadjuvant TT is emerging as valuable, particularly in breast cancer, and ongoing studies evaluate TT in the perioperative setting for early-stage NSCLC. In this review, we aim to collect and describe the large amount of data available in the literature about adjuvant TT across different histologies, focusing on epidemiology, major advances, and future directions.

Ripretinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that was approved by the United States FDA in 2020 for treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in patients who received prior treatment with three or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In this case report, we show the durable clinical benefit achieved in a patient with GIST by using ripretinib and repeated timely surgical resection of limited disease progression. The total time on ripretinib was 43 months which is longer than the current reported data from ripretinib clinical trials. Such approach for using multi-disciplinary disease management can improve the durability of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including ripretinib, and associated clinical outcomes.

Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have become the standard treatment for patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST); however, secondary mutations can still drive disease progression. Studies have shown that ripretinib, a novel switch-control TKI, inhibits various primary and secondary drug-resistant mutations. There is a paucity of data on the effectiveness and safety of ripretinib in a real-world setting. This prospective, large-scale, real-world registry study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ripretinib as a fourth-line treatment in Chinese patients with advanced GIST.

Patients ≥ 18 years of age having recurrent/metastatic GIST were enrolled. Key endpoints were median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), and adverse events (AEs) incidence. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify various parameters associated with PFS.

A total of 240 patients were enrolled. After a median follow-up period of 6.5 months, the mPFS [95% confidence interval (CI)] was 7.70 (6.60, 8.60) months and the mOS was not reached. Multivariate analysis revealed association of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score with PFS and superior benefits for non-gastric was observed as compared to gastric GISTs [hazard ratio (HR) 0.58, 95% CI (0.39-0.86)]. Disease control rate and tumor shrinkage (any magnitude) was 73% and 43%, respectively. Ripretinib was also effective in the subgroup of patients with different gene mutations. The toxicities were tolerable, and most reported AEs were alopecia (17.1%) and hand-foot syndrome (15.4%).

Ripretinib demonstrated effectiveness and a tolerable safety profile, making it a viable option as a fourth- or later-line treatment in Chinese patients with advanced GISTs, especially for non-gastric GISTs.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05697107.

Limited data are available about the influence of KIT and PDGFRA mutations on overall survival (OS) of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) treated with adjuvant imatinib.

The Scandinavian Sarcoma Group XVIII/AIO multicenter trial accrued 400 patients with a high risk for GIST recurrence after macroscopically complete surgery between February 4, 2004, and September 29, 2008. The patients received adjuvant imatinib 400 mg/day for either 1 year or 3 years based on random allocation. We analyzed using conventional sequencing KIT and PDGFRA mutations centrally from 341 (85%) patients who had localized, centrally confirmed GIST, and correlated the results with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and OS in exploratory analyses.

During a median follow-up time of 10 years, 164 RFS events and 76 deaths occurred. Most patients were re-treated with imatinib when GIST recurred. Patients with KIT exon 11 deletion or indel mutation treated with 3 years of adjuvant imatinib survived longer than patients treated for 1 year [10-year OS 86% versus 64%, respectively; HR, 0.34; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.15-0.72; P = 0.007], and also had longer RFS (10-year RFS 47% versus 29%; HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.31-0.74; P < 0.001). Patients with KIT exon 9 mutation had unfavorable OS regardless of the duration of adjuvant imatinib.

Compared with 1 year of imatinib, 3 years of adjuvant imatinib led to 66% reduction in the estimated risk of death and a high 10-year OS rate in the subset of patients with a KIT exon 11 deletion/indel mutation.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are rare mesenchymal tumors characterized by KIT or PDGFRA mutations. Over three decades, significant changes in drug discovery and loco-regional (LR) procedures have impacted treatment strategies. We assessed the evolution of treatment strategies for metastatic GIST patients treated in the three national coordinating centers of NetSarc, the French network of sarcoma referral centers endorsed by the National Institute of Cancers, from 1990 to 2018. The primary objective was to describe the clinical and biological profiles as well as the treatment modalities of patients with metastatic GIST in a real-life setting, including access to clinical trials and LR procedures in the metastatic setting. Secondary objectives were to assess (1) patients' outcome in terms of time to next treatment (TNT) for each line of systemic treatment, (2) patients' overall survival (OS), (3) evolution of patients' treatment modalities and OS according to treatment access: <2002 (pre-imatinib approval), 2002-2006 (pre-sunitinib approval), 2006-2014 (pre-regorafenib approval), post 2014, and (4) the impact of clinical trials and LR procedures on TNT and OS in the metastatic setting. 1038 patients with a diagnosis of GIST made in one of the three participating centers between 1990 and 2018 were included in the national prospective database. Among them, 492 patients presented metastasis, either synchronous or metachronous. The median number of therapy lines in the metastatic setting was 3 (range 0-15). More than half of the patients (55%) participated in a clinical trial during the course of their metastatic disease and half (51%) underwent additional LR procedures on metastatic sites. The median OS in the metastatic setting was 83.4 months (95%CI [72.7; 97.9]). The median TNT was 26.7 months (95%CI [23.4; 32.3]) in first-line, 10.2 months (95%CI [8.6; 11.8]) in second line, 6.7 months (95%CI [5.3; 8.5]) in third line, and 5.5 months (95%CI [4.3; 6.7]) in fourth line, respectively. There was no statistical difference in OS in the metastatic setting between the four therapeutic periods (log rank, p = 0.18). In multivariate analysis, age, AFIP Miettinen classification, mutational status, surgery of the primary tumor, participation in a clinical trial in the first line and LR procedure to metastatic sites were associated with longer TNT in the first line, whereas age, mitotic index, mutational status, surgery of the primary tumor and LR procedure to metastatic sites were associated with longer OS. This real-life study advocates for early reference of metastatic GIST patients to expert centers to orchestrate the best access to future innovative clinical trials together with LR strategies and further improve GIST patients' survival.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. Surgical treatment is recommended for the majority of localised GIST, while systemic treatment is the cornerstone of management for metastatic or unresectable disease. While a three-year regimen of imatinib is the standard of care in the adjuvant setting, there is no precise recommendation for the duration of neoadjuvant treatment, where imatinib is usually given between 4 and 12 months. Continuous treatment with imatinib at a dose of 400 mg once per day is recommended for most patients with unresectable or metastatic GIST in the first line. An exception is represented by patients with tumours harbouring the imatinib-insensitive PDGFRA D842V mutation who would be better treated with avapritinib. Targeted therapies are also recommended in the presence of NTRK rearrangements and BRAF mutations, although limited data are available. While an increase in the dose of imatinib to 800 mg is an option for the second line, sunitinib is usually considered the standard of care. Similar outcomes were reported for ripretinib in patients with tumours harbouring KIT exon 11 mutation, with significantly fewer side effects. Regorafenib and ripretinib are the standards of care in the third and fourth lines, respectively. The recent development of various systemic treatment options allows for a more personalised approach based on the molecular profile of the GIST, patient characteristics, and the profile of medications' adverse events. A multidisciplinary approach is paramount since combining systemic treatment with locoregional treatment options and supportive care is vital for long-term survival.

After the standardization, recording and follow-up of imatinib use that significantly prolongs survival of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), a comprehensive reassessment of the prognosis of GISTs is necessary and more conductive to treatment options.

A total of 2185 GISTs between 2013 and 2016 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and comprised our training (n = 1456) and internal validation cohorts (n = 729). The risk factors extracted from univariate and multivariate analyses were used to establish a predictive nomogram. The model was evaluated and tested in the validation cohort internally and in 159 patients with GIST diagnosed between January 2015 and June 2017 in Xijing Hospital externally.

The median OS was 49 months (range, 0-83 months) in the training cohort and 51 months (0-83 months) in the validation cohort. The concordance index (C-index) of the nomogram was 0.777 (95% CI, 0.752-0.802) and 0.7787 (0.7785, bootstrap corrected) in training and internal validation cohorts, respectively, and 0.7613 (0.7579, bootstrap corrected) in the external validation cohort. Receiver operating characteristic curves and calibration curves for 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) showed a high degree of discrimination and calibration. The area under the curve showed that the new model performed better than the TNM staging system. In addition, the model could be dynamically visualized on a webpage.

We developed a comprehensive survival prediction model for assessing the 1-, 3- and 5-year OS of patients with GIST in the postimatinib era. This predictive model outperforms the traditional TNM staging system and sheds light on the improvement of the prognostic prediction and the selection of treatment strategies for GISTs.

Imatinib re-challenge is one of the available therapeutic options for patients with treatment-refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). Intermittent dosing of imatinib was suggested to delay outgrow of the imatinib-resistant clones in a preclinical study, and it could potentially reduce the adverse events.

A randomised phase 2 study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a continuous or intermittent imatinib schedule in GIST patients whose disease had progressed to at least imatinib and sunitinib.

Fifty patients were included in the full analysis set. The disease control rate at 12 weeks was 34.8% and 43.5%, and median progression-free survival was 1.68 and 1.57 months in the continuous and intermittent groups, respectively. The frequency of diarrhoea, anorexia, decreased neutrophil, or dysphagia was lower in the intermittent group. The scores for global health status/quality of life was not significantly deteriorated over the 8 weeks in both groups.

The intermittent dosage did not improve the efficacy outcomes as compared to the continuous dosage, but showed slightly better safety profiles. Given the limited efficacy of imatinib re-challenge, intermittent dosage may also be considered in clinical circumstances where standard fourth-line agent is unavailable or all other viable treatments failed.

Current guidelines recommend indefinite imatinib treatment for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients. Imatinib-refractory progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were previously reported not to differ between GIST patients who interrupted imatinib and those who did not.

Clinical outcomes of 77 consecutive patients with recurrent or metastatic GIST who interrupted imatinib treatment after maintaining years of imatinib treatment in the absence of gross tumor lesions were retrospectively analyzed. Associations between clinical factors and progression-free survival (PFS) following imatinib interruption were analyzed.

The median time from the absence of gross tumor lesions to imatinib interruption was 61.5 months. Since imatinib interruption, the median PFS was 19.6 months, and 4 patients (26.3%) remained progression-free for longer than 5 years. Among the patients who had progressive disease following the interruption, imatinib re-introduction led to an 88.6% objective response rate and a 100% disease control rate. Complete removal of the initial gross tumor lesion(s) and complete removal of the residual gross tumor lesion(s) by local treatment (vs. no local treatment or residual lesions after local treatment) were independently associated with favorable PFS.

Interruption of imatinib following prolonged maintenance in the absence of gross tumor lesions led to disease progression in the majority of cases. However, re-introduction of imatinib resulted in effective tumor control. Unmaintained remission seems to be possible in some patients with metastatic or recurrent GIST after a prolonged remission with imatinib if there is complete removal of any gross tumor lesions.