1
|
Norman WR, Ricardo Ramirez SE, Seale JR. Non-Dialysis-Associated Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis: A Unique Case Presentation and Surgical Intervention. Cureus 2024; 16:e76701. [PMID: 39898144 PMCID: PMC11785461 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2025] Open
Abstract
Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a rare condition involving a thick fibrocollagenous membrane surrounding the small intestine, often associated with peritoneal dialysis. Its occurrence in non-dialysis patients is not well-studied. A man in his 30s from India presented with severe abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and constipation. CT imaging revealed small bowel dilation with a transition zone. Diagnostic laparoscopy and exploratory laparotomy identified a thick fibrous rind encasing the small bowel, suspected to be linked to peritoneal tuberculosis (TB) based on positive QuantiFERON-TB and purified protein derivative (PPD) tests. This case highlights that EPS can occur in patients without a history of dialysis, potentially due to TB. Recognition of this rare condition and further research into its causes is essential for improving diagnostic and treatment strategies.
Collapse
|
2
|
Graversen M, Rouvelas I, Ainsworth AP, Bjarnesen AP, Detlefsen S, Ellebaek SB, Fristrup CW, Liljefors MG, Lundell L, Nilsson M, Pfeiffer P, Tarpgaard LS, Tsekrekos A, Mortensen MB. Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic D2 Gastrectomy in Combination with Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in Patients with Gastric Cancer at High Risk of Recurrence-The PIPAC-OPC4 Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2023. [PMID: 36867174 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13278-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) are at high risk of peritoneal recurrence despite perioperative chemotherapy and radical resection. This study evaluated feasibility and safety of laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy in combination with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). METHODS This was a prospective, controlled bi-institutional study in patients with GAC at high risk of recurrence treated with PIPAC with cisplatin and doxorubicin (PIPAC C/D) after laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy. High risk was defined as a poorly cohesive subtype with predominance of signet-ring cells, clinical stage ≥ T3 and/or ≥ N2, or positive peritoneal cytology. Peritoneal lavage fluid was collected before and after resection. Cisplatin (10.5 mg/m2) and doxorubicin (2.1 mg/m2) were aerosolized after anastomosis (flow 0.5-0.8 ml/s, maximum pressure 300 PSI). Treatment was feasible and safe if ≤ 20% had Dindo-Clavien ≥ 3b surgical complications or CTCAE ≥ 4 medical adverse events within 30 days. Secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), peritoneal lavage cytology, and completion of postoperative systemic chemotherapy. RESULTS Twenty-one patients were treated with a D2 gastrectomy and PIPAC C/D. The median age was 61 years (range 24-76), there were eleven female patients, and 20 patients had preoperative chemotherapy. There was no mortality. Two patients had grade 3b complications that were potentially related to PIPAC C/D (one anastomotic leakage, and one late duodenal blow-out). One patient had severe neutropenia, and nine patients had moderate pain. The LOS was 6 days (4-26). One patient had positive peritoneal lavage cytology before resection, and none were positive after. Fifteen patients had postoperative chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy in combination with PIPAC C/D is feasible and safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Graversen
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. .,Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. .,OPEN - Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. .,Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - I Rouvelas
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital and Division of Surgery and Oncology, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A P Ainsworth
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - A P Bjarnesen
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - S Detlefsen
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - S B Ellebaek
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - C W Fristrup
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - M G Liljefors
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital and Division of Surgery and Oncology, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Lundell
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital and Division of Surgery and Oncology, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Nilsson
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital and Division of Surgery and Oncology, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Pfeiffer
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - L S Tarpgaard
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - A Tsekrekos
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital and Division of Surgery and Oncology, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M B Mortensen
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hu J, Wang Z, Wang X, Xie S. Side-effects of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. PeerJ 2023; 11:e15277. [PMID: 37138820 PMCID: PMC10150720 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) produces unwanted side-effects that are mainly caused by chemotherapeutic drugs in the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, and these effects have not been systematically summarized. The aim of this article was to provide a comprehensive overview of the side-effects of HIPEC for GI cancers and propose practical strategies for adverse event management. Methodology PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for side-effects of HIPEC in GI cancers prior to October 20, 2022. A total of 79 articles were included in this review. Results Adverse events, such as enterocutaneous digestive fistulas, GI tract perforation, neutropenia, postoperative bleeding, ventricular tachycardia, hyperglycemia, hypocalcemia, renal impairment, encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis, scrotal ulceration, and sarcopenia were described, and their clinical management was discussed. These side-effects involve the digestive, hematopoietic, circulatory, metabolic, and urinary systems. Effective methods for adverse event management included an expert multidisciplinary team, replacing chemotherapy drugs, using Chinese medicine, and careful preoperative assessments. Conclusion The side-effects of HIPEC are frequent and can be minimized by several effective methods. This study proposes practical strategies for adverse event management of HIPEC to assist physicians in choosing the optimal treatment method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiyun Hu
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Zhenxing Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Haikou People’s Hospital/Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, Haikou, Hainan, China
| | - Xinrun Wang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Shucai Xie
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Haikou People’s Hospital/Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, Haikou, Hainan, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Augustine T, Culkin A, Soop M. Peritoneal Adhesions and Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis. INTESTINAL FAILURE 2023:95-120. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-22265-8_8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
|
5
|
Finnegan A, Glass S, Mookherjee S. An encompassing issue. J Hosp Med 2022; 17:921-925. [PMID: 36052703 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.12950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anila Finnegan
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Susan Glass
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Somnath Mookherjee
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Predictors of Small Bowel Obstruction Post-Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:2176-2183. [PMID: 35852704 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05394-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) for peritoneal malignancies carries considerable morbidity; however, the significance of postoperative small bowel obstruction (SBO) is not well defined. We aim to identify predictors for post-CRS/HIPEC SBO and their oncologic associations. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of all CRS/HIPEC cases performed at a surgical oncology center (2013-2018). Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, perioperative factors, and province-wide hospital readmissions were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used for baseline characteristics, multivariate logistic regression for predictors of SBO at 1 year, and Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test for survival analysis. RESULTS A total of n = 97 CRS/HIPEC procedures were performed for diagnoses of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (44%), high-grade appendiceal adenocarcinoma (8%), colorectal adenocarcinoma (34%), and mesothelioma (9%). The median peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) score was 16. Cumulative incidence of post-CRS/HIPEC SBO readmission was 24% at 1 year and 38% at 2 and 3 years. Of 29 patients readmitted with SBO, 14 (48%) had more than one readmission for SBO, and nine surgeries were performed for obstruction. Multivariate regression identified significant independent predictors of SBO within 1-year post-CRS/HIPEC as high-grade appendiceal or colorectal primaries (odds ratio [OR] 4.58, p = 0.02) and PCI ≥ 20 (OR 3.27, p = 0.05). Overall survival (OS) was worse in patients readmitted with SBO within 1 year compared to those without (3-year OS 58% vs. 75%, p = 0.017). CONCLUSION SBO is the most common readmission diagnosis post-CRS/HIPEC and is associated with worse survival. High-grade appendiceal and colorectal primary tumors and PCI ≥ 20 are predictors for SBO.
Collapse
|
7
|
Ni Z, Chen Q, Huang C, Wang S, Huang Q. Sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis as a rare cause of intestinal obstruction after the treatment of peritoneal mesothelioma: a case report and review of the literature. Transl Cancer Res 2021; 10:3074-3080. [PMID: 35116616 PMCID: PMC8798027 DOI: 10.21037/tcr-20-3259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis (SEP) is a rare cause of intestinal obstruction that is characterized by a thick greyish-white fibrotic membrane encasing the small bowel. The clinical features are typically nonspecific, and they occasionally present with recurrent episodes of incomplete or complete intestinal obstruction. The etiology of SEP remains unclear, and the diagnosis is often delayed mainly due to the lack of specific symptoms. Here, we first report a patient who suffered from SEP after treatment for malignant mesothelioma (MM) with tumor resection supplemented with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) once and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) eight times. The patient was discharged ten days after surgery and was free of complications at the 4-month follow-up. In addition, we reviewed the published literature from PubMed, only 7 articles of 16 cases finally met the defined requirements. Nine cases of SEP after IPC and 7 cases of SEP after HIPEC were previously reported. We synthetically review the pathogenesis, treatments, and outcomes. In conclusion, SEP is a rare abdominal disease, which is difficult to diagnose preoperatively. CT scanning is the most helpful imaging method for the diagnosis of SEP. Surgery is the most effective method for diagnosis and treatment, if conservative treatment has no effect or abdominal symptoms are aggravated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhizhan Ni
- Department of General Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qing Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chenshen Huang
- Department of General Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Song Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qi Huang
- Department of General Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Detz DJ, Podrat JL, Muniz Castro JC, Lee YK, Zheng F, Purnell S, Pei KY. Small bowel obstruction. Curr Probl Surg 2020; 58:100893. [PMID: 34130796 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2020.100893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Yoon K Lee
- Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Feibi Zheng
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yu R, Ya Y, Ni X, Fan G. Imaging and treatment of idiopathic abdominal cocoon in 9 patients. Exp Ther Med 2019; 19:651-657. [PMID: 31885704 PMCID: PMC6913277 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2019.8258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2019] [Accepted: 11/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of the current study was to investigate the imaging features of abdominal cocoon (AC), the methods of diagnosis and treatment of AC and improve understanding of AC. To do this, the current study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and imaging findings of nine patients with AC. The clinical manifestations included intestinal obstruction in six out of the nine cases of AC, which included two cases of bowel strangulation and five cases of soft masses in the abdomen. Imaging features of AC included the following: i) Bowel loops were usually present in a fixed cluster; ii) bowel loops were encapsulated partially or totally by a thickening fibrous membrane-like ‘cocoon’; iii) bowel wall thickened in the ‘cocoon’, and the bowel loops and sac adhered; iv) loculated ascites in the ‘cocoon’; v) abnormal clustering of the mesenteric vasculature, hypoplasia of the omentum majus was present or absent; and vi) Ileus occurred in some cases. The features of a plain abdominal X-ray, a gastrointestinal barium meal series and ultrasonography lacked specificity. The results of CT in eight out of nine cases of AC were consistent with the surgical findings. Surgery was the first choice of therapy. All cases were treated surgically, showing that the bowel loops were encapsulated partially or totally by a thickened fibrous membrane. All cases received operations including partial or total excision of the membrane and enterolysis. In conclusion, CT may be highly valuable in the preoperative diagnosis of AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Yu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215004, P.R. China
| | - Yang Ya
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215004, P.R. China
| | - Xiaoqiong Ni
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215004, P.R. China
| | - Guohua Fan
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215004, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dave A, McMahon J, Zahid A. Congenital peritoneal encapsulation: A review and novel classification system. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25:2294-2307. [PMID: 31148901 PMCID: PMC6529893 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i19.2294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Revised: 03/23/2019] [Accepted: 03/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Congenital peritoneal encapsulation (CPE) is a very rare, congenital condition characterised by the presence of an accessory peritoneal membrane which encases a variable extent of the small bowel. It is unclear how CPE develops, however it is currently understood to be a result of an aberrant adhesion in the peritoneal lining of the physiological hernia in foetal mid-gut development. The condition was first described in 1868, and subsequently there have been only 45 case reports of the phenomenon. No formal, systematised review of CPE has yet been performed, meaning the condition remains poorly understood, underdiagnosed and mismanaged. Diagnosis of CPE remains clinical with important adjuncts provided by imaging and diagnostic laparoscopy. Two thirds of patients present with abdominal pain, likely secondary to sub-acute bowel obstruction. A fixed, asymmetrical distension of the abdomen and differential consistency on abdominal palpation are more specific clinical features present in approximately 10% of cases. CPE is virtually undetectable on plain imaging, and is only detected on 40% of patients with computed tomography scan. Most patients will undergo diagnostic laparotomy to confirm the diagnosis. Management of CPE includes both medical management of the critically-unstable patient and surgical laparotomy, partial peritonectomy and adhesiolysis. Prognosis following prompt surgical treatment is excellent, with a majority of patients being symptom free at follow up. This review summarises the current literature on the aetiology, diagnosis and treatment of this rare disease. We also introduce a novel classification system for encapsulating bowel diseases, which may distinguish CPE from the commoner, more morbid conditions of abdominal cocoon and encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aneesh Dave
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown 2050, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, Edward Ford Building, the University of Sydney, Camperdown 2006, New South Wales, Australia
| | - James McMahon
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown 2050, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Assad Zahid
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown 2050, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, Edward Ford Building, the University of Sydney, Camperdown 2006, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mangan C, Moinuddin Z, Summers A, de Reuver P, van Dellen D, Augustine T. Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis following hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. ANZ J Surg 2018; 89:E468-E469. [DOI: 10.1111/ans.14770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2018] [Accepted: 06/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Clodagh Mangan
- Department of Transplant and Endocrine SurgeryManchester Royal Infirmary Manchester UK
| | - Zia Moinuddin
- Division of Transplant and Endocrine SurgeryManchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University Foundation Trust Manchester UK
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science CentreUniversity of Manchester Manchester UK
| | - Angela Summers
- Division of Transplant and Endocrine SurgeryManchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University Foundation Trust Manchester UK
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science CentreUniversity of Manchester Manchester UK
| | - Philip de Reuver
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryRadboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen The Netherlands
| | - David van Dellen
- Division of Transplant and Endocrine SurgeryManchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University Foundation Trust Manchester UK
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science CentreUniversity of Manchester Manchester UK
| | - Titus Augustine
- Division of Transplant and Endocrine SurgeryManchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University Foundation Trust Manchester UK
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science CentreUniversity of Manchester Manchester UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Danford CJ, Lin SC, Smith MP, Wolf JL. Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24:3101-3111. [PMID: 30065556 PMCID: PMC6064970 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i28.3101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 06/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/25/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a debilitating condition characterized by a fibrocollagenous membrane encasing the small intestine, resulting in recurrent small bowel obstructions. EPS is most commonly associated with long-term peritoneal dialysis, though medications, peritoneal infection, and systemic inflammatory disorders have been implicated. Many cases remain idiopathic. Diagnosis is often delayed given the rarity of the disorder combined with non-specific symptoms and laboratory findings. Although cross-sectional imaging with computed tomography of the abdomen can be suggestive of the disorder, many patients undergo exploratory laparotomy for diagnosis. Mortality approaches 50% one year after diagnosis. Treatment for EPS involves treating the underlying condition or eliminating possible inciting agents (i.e. peritoneal dialysis, medications, infections) and nutritional support, frequently with total parenteral nutrition. EPS-specific treatment depends on the disease stage. In the inflammatory stage, corticosteroids are the treatment of choice, while in the fibrotic stage, tamoxifen may be beneficial. In practice, distinguishing between stages may be difficult and both may be used. Surgical intervention, consisting of peritonectomy and enterolysis, is time-consuming and high-risk and is reserved for situations in which conservative medical therapy fails in institutions with surgical expertise in this area. Herein we review the available literature of the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of this rare, but potentially devastating disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Danford
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - Steven C Lin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - Martin P Smith
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - Jacqueline L Wolf
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Graversen M, Detlefsen S, Pfeiffer P, Lundell L, Mortensen MB. Severe peritoneal sclerosis after repeated pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (PIPAC OX): report of two cases and literature survey. Clin Exp Metastasis 2018; 35:103-108. [PMID: 29705882 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-018-9895-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new laparoscopic administration of chemotherapy for peritoneal metastasis (PM). PIPAC is repeated every 5th week, and seems to stabilize or improve quality of life, and might improve survival. So far, PIPAC has been well tolerated. With this paper, we aim to highlight a potential severe adverse reaction, as we describe the first cases of severe peritoneal sclerosis (SPS) caused by PIPAC. Patients with isolated PM were included in a prospective PIPAC protocol. Following insufflation of normothermic CO2, laparoscopy was performed at an intraabdominal pressure of 12 mmHg. After peritoneal lavage and quadrant biopsies of the PM, the patients were treated with oxaliplatin 92 mg/m2 (flowrate 0.5 ml/s, maximum pressure of 200 per square inch). Treatment related toxicity was evaluated after 2 weeks. Response was evaluated histologically by the Peritoneal Regression Grading Score (PRGS) and cytologically by analysis of the lavage fluid. In a series of 24 PIPAC patients treated with oxaliplatin, two patients developed SPS. Patient one had a mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix with PM, the mean PRGS was reduced from 2.75 to 1.75 during the course of therapy. Patient two had an appendiceal goblet cell carcinoid with a dominating mucinous adenocarcinoma component with PM, the mean PRGS was reduced from 2.00 to 1.67. Repeated applications of PIPAC with oxaliplatin can lead to SPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Graversen
- Upper GI and HPB Section, Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, Indgang 20, Penthouse 2., 5000, Odense C, Denmark. .,Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
| | - S Detlefsen
- Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - P Pfeiffer
- Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - L Lundell
- Upper GI and HPB Section, Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, Indgang 20, Penthouse 2., 5000, Odense C, Denmark.,Division of Surgery, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M B Mortensen
- Upper GI and HPB Section, Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, Indgang 20, Penthouse 2., 5000, Odense C, Denmark.,Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kakchekeeva T, Demtröder C, Herath NI, Griffiths D, Torkington J, Solaß W, Dutreix M, Reymond MA. In Vivo Feasibility of Electrostatic Precipitation as an Adjunct to Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (ePIPAC). Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:592-598. [PMID: 26842487 PMCID: PMC5149560 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5108-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Background Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is limited by tissue penetration. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) has been shown to improve drug uptake by utilizing the physical properties of gas and pressure. This study investigated the effect of adding electrostatic precipitation to further enhance the pharmacologic properties of this technique. Methods A comparative study was performed using an in vivo porcine model. There were 3 cases in each group, PIPAC and electrostatic precipitation pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (ePIPAC), plus 1 negative control comparing intraperitoneal distribution and tissue uptake of 2 tracer substances (toluidine blue and DT01). Tracer uptake was determined by measuring DT01 in tissue and peritoneal fluid at the end of each procedure. Results Electrostatic precipitation of the aerosol was technically feasible in all ePIPAC animals. The aerosol was cleared completely from the visual field within 15 s in the ePIPAC group versus 30 min in the PIPAC group. The peritoneal surface was homogeneously stained in both groups. After 30 min, 1.5 % remaining DT01 was measured in samples of ePIPAC-treated peritoneal fluid versus 15 % in PIPAC animals (p = 0.01). Tissue concentration was increased after ePIPAC versus PIPAC (p = 0.06). Conclusions ePIPAC is technically feasible and improves tissue uptake of 2 tracer substances compared to PIPAC by up to tenfold. Intraperitoneal distribution was homogeneous in both groups. ePIPAC has the potential to allow more efficient drug uptake, further dose reduction, a significant shortening of the time required for PIPAC application, and improved health and safety measures. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1245/s10434-016-5108-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tinatin Kakchekeeva
- Department of Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Cedric Demtröder
- Department of Surgery, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | | | | | - Jared Torkington
- Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy (WIMAT), Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Wiebke Solaß
- Institute of Pathology, Medical School Hanover, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Marc A Reymond
- Department of Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. .,Department of Surgery, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|