Objective Despite the recent development of various novel therapeutic approaches for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL), optimal management of patients with R/R DLBCL who are elderly and/or unfit has not yet been established. Methods and Patients We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of the R-mEPOCH regimen comprising rituximab, etoposide, vincristine, doxorubicin, carboplatin, and prednisolone in transplant-ineligible patients with R/R DLBCL. Results In total, 22 patients were included in this study. The median patient age was 75 years old. The median number of prior lines of therapy was one (range, 1-5). The overall response rate was 68%, with 45% achieving complete response (CR) or unconfirmed CR and 23% achieving partial response. With a median follow-up of 27.8 months, the median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 17.1 and 27.4 months, respectively. The 2- and 5-year OS rates were 50% and 28%, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (n=18 [82%]), febrile neutropenia (n=16 [73%]), anemia (n=12 [55%]), and thrombocytopenia (n=8 [36%]). The median total lifetime cumulative dose of anthracyclines was 281 mg/m2 (range, 69-536 mg/m2) in doxorubicin equivalents. One case of grade 1 bradycardia occurred, leading to the discontinuation of R-mEPOCH. No other cardiac adverse events of grade ≥3 and/or discontinuation of treatment were observed. Conclusion Our study suggests that the R-mEPOCH regimen may be an effective and tolerable salvage regimen for transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL patients.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy depends on T cells that are genetically modified to recognize and attack cancer cells. Their effectiveness thus hinges on the functionality of a patient's own T cells. Since CAR T-cell therapy is currently only approved for advanced cancers after at least one line of chemotherapy, we evaluated the potential negative effects of prior exposure to chemotherapy on T-cell functionality.

We studied T cells of two B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patient cohorts, one collected before treatment (pre-therapy) and the other after one or more (median 3) lines of chemotherapy (post-therapy). Leveraging advanced multiparameter flow cytometry, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), whole-genome DNA methylation arrays and in vitro functionality testing of generated CAR T cells, we compared patient samples in their suitability for effective CAR T-cell therapy.

We discovered significant modifications in T-cell subsets and their transcriptional profiles secondary to chemotherapy exposure. Our analysis revealed a discernible shift towards phenotypically more differentiated T cells and an upregulation of markers indicative of T-cell exhaustion. Additionally, scRNA-seq and DNA methylation analyses revealed gene expression and epigenetic changes associated with diminished functionality in post-therapy T cells. Cytotoxicity assays demonstrated superior killing efficacy of CAR T cells derived from treatment-naïve patients compared with those with chemotherapy history.

These findings corroborate that employing T cells collected prior to frontline chemotherapy could enhance the effectiveness of CAR T-cell therapy and improve patient outcomes.

In the phase I Epi-RCHOP study (NCT02889523), we reported that R-CHOP-tazemetostat was well tolerated with the recommended phase II dose, consistent with monotherapy.

Phase II included newly diagnosed diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients aged 60-80 years who received six cycles of rituximab-CHOP (R-CHOP) with continuous tazemetostat (800 mg BID), plus two cycles of tazemetostat and rituximab (cycles 7 and 8), from July 31, 2020 to July 18, 2022. Primary endpoint was positron emission tomography complete metabolic response (CMR). Sample size was calculated with H0 of 70% and H1 assumption of 80%.

The trial enrolled 122 patients: median age 70 (60-80), 90.2% with stage III-IV, and 73.8% with International Prognostic Index 3-5. Overall, 100 patients (82%) received eight cycles, while 22 had premature treatment discontinuation (PTD), including 12 during the first two cycles. Reasons for PTD were consent withdrawal (N = 10), adverse events (N = 6), death (N = 2), protocol deviation (N = 2), progressive disease (N = 1), and physician decision (N = 1). The median percentage of relative dose intensity of tazemetostat and R-CHOP exceeded 90%, but required a protocol amendment and reduction in vincristine dosage at 1 mg full dose. At the end of treatment or PTD, 92/122 patients (75.4%) achieved CMR, eight (6.6%) partial metabolic response, five (4.1%) progressive disease, two (1.6%) died (septic shock), and 15 (12.3%) were not evaluated. Sensitivity analysis, excluding ten non-evaluated patients who withdrew consent, showed CMR in 82.1%. After a median follow-up of 18.5 months (IQR: 15.4-21), estimated progression-free and overall survival at 18 months were 77.7% (95% CI: 67.5-85.1%) and 88.8% (95% CI: 79.9-93.9%), respectively.

R-CHOP plus tazemetostat is feasible with a promising CMR in elderly DLBCL patients. Complementary biomarker studies are needed for a more personalized approach.

This study was sponsored under a grant from Ipsen.

Subcutaneous (SC) rituximab has demonstrated advantages over intravenous (IV) administration; however, insufficient data exist on its use with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in Chinese patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This multicenter, phase II, randomized, controlled study was conducted across China between February 2021 and October 2022. Fifty adult patients with previously untreated CD20-positive DLBCL were randomized to receive one cycle of IV rituximab and seven cycles of SC rituximab (RSC-CHOP; n = 26), or eight cycles of IV rituximab (RIV-CHOP; n = 24), combined with six or eight cycles of CHOP. Geometric mean ratio of trough rituximab serum concentration of SC to that of IV rituximab (Ctrough,SC/Ctrough,IV) at cycle 7 was 1.52 (90% CI: 1.28-1.79), demonstrating non-inferiority of Ctrough,SC. The complete response rate was similar in both treatment arms. SC rituximab is a viable option in Chinese patients with untreated CD20-positive DLBCL, potentially reducing administration burden (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04660799).

Since the 1990s, the standard of care for the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) had been salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT) in patients with a chemotherapy-sensitive remission. However, promising results from the recent TRANSFORM and ZUMA-7 trials evaluating the efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy versus HDT-ASCT for second line relapsed/refractory DLBCL have sought to challenge this standard of care. While these studies have established a new standard for the treatment of early relapsed and primary refractory DLBCL, significant differences in the trial design between these studies and limitations with the timing of randomization during the disease course warrant a thoughtful interpretation of the results. Additionally, the financial burden and logistic challenges of CAR T-cell administration and limited access to these therapies continue to be ongoing issues. Despite the encouraging results from these trials, HDT-ASCT continues to have a role in the treatment of DLBCL, especially in disease relapsing ≥12 months after initial therapy, and in chemo sensitive disease with a good response to salvage chemotherapy. Ongoing studies evaluating novel salvage regimens for use prior to HDT-ASCT, and future studies evaluating the role of CAR T-cell therapy in chemo sensitive disease will help determine the continued role of HDT-ASCT for relapsed/refractory DLBCL.

Despite recent approvals of new treatments, relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains challenging to treat, with limited durable responses and a high proportion of patients relapsing after two or more lines of therapy. Loncastuximab tesirine (Lonca) is a highly potent CD19-targeted antibody drug conjugate with convenient dosing for patients with third-line R/R DLBCL.

In the absence of head-to-head trials, unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) were conducted to compare the relative efficacy and safety of Lonca with polatuzumab vedotin + bendamustine and rituximab (Pola + BR).

Four studies included in the MAICs were identified via systematic review and hand-searching. Lonca (LOTIS-2) was compared with three comparator studies for Pola + BR (GO29365 extension study, COTA database, Dal et al. 2023). Overall, there was no evidence of a difference in overall response and complete response (CR) rates. Despite Pola + BR demonstrating a higher CR rate in the GO29365 extension study, this did not translate into significant improvements in progression-free or overall survival. Survival analyses indicated similar efficacy between treatments across studies, with most comparisons/meta-analyses showing no statistically significant differences. Lonca had significantly lower odds of Grade 3-4 infections, any serious adverse event (SAE), and specific SAEs including febrile neutropenia, pneumonia and pyrexia. Of the safety endpoints analyzed, none indicated significant differences in favor of Pola + BR.

These results suggest no evidence of a difference in efficacy between the two treatments and potentially more favorable safety profile for Lonca compared with Pola + BR in patients with R/R DLBCL after two or more lines of treatment.

Double-hit (DHL) and double expressor (DEL) DLBCL have poor prognosis with standard therapy but CART may overcome this poor prognostic impact. In this multicenter retrospective study, we sought to confirm this observation by evaluating survival outcomes among patients with relapsed/refractory DHL and DEL treated with CART and evaluate outcomes of relapse post-CART. A total of 408 adult patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL from 13 academic centers were included based on the availability of DHL and DEL. All 408 patients were included in the DHL (n = 80) vs non-DHL (n = 328) analysis, while 333 patients were included in the analysis of DHL (n = 80) vs DEL (n = 74) vs non (n = 179). On MVA, there were no differences for PFS for DHL vs non-DHL (HR 0.8, 95%CI 0.5-1.3, p = 0.35) or DHL vs DEL vs other (three-way p value, p = 0.5). Response rates and toxicities were similar among groups. Patients with DEL had the highest relapse rates post-CART, while DHL had the worst overall survival after CART relapse. In sum, our data support the notion that CART cell therapy can overcome the poor prognostic impact of DHL and DEL DLBCL in the relapsed/refractory setting. Additionally, patients with DHL that relapse after CART have a very poor prognosis.

In patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), brentuximab vedotin (BV) as monotherapy or combined with either lenalidomide (Len) or rituximab (R) has demonstrated efficacy with acceptable safety. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of BV + Len + R versus placebo + Len + R in patients with R/R DLBCL.

ECHELON-3 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 trial comparing BV + Len + R with placebo + Len + R in patients with R/R DLBCL. Patients received BV or placebo once every 3 weeks, Len once daily, and R once every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end points included investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). A prespecified interim analysis was performed after 134 OS events, with two-sided P = .0232 as the efficacy boundary.

Patients (N = 230) were randomly assigned to receive BV + Len + R (n = 112) or placebo + Len + R (n = 118). Two patients in the placebo arm did not receive treatment. With a median follow-up of 16.4 months, the median OS was 13.8 months with BV + Len + R versus 8.5 months with placebo + Len + R (hazard ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.89]; two-sided P = .009). The median PFS was 4.2 months with BV + Len + R versus 2.6 months with placebo + Len + R (hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.73]; two-sided P < .001). The ORR was 64% ([95% CI, 55 to 73]; two-sided P < .001) with BV + Len + R and 42% (95% CI, 33 to 51) with placebo + Len + R; complete response rates were 40% and 19%, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 97% of patients in both arms. In both arms, the most common treatment-emergent AEs were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, and anemia.

BV + Len + R demonstrated a statistically significant survival benefit with a manageable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with R/R DLBCL.

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) compared to the general population. Here, we explored the inflammatory profiles in the blood of RA patients who had developed DLBCL. RA-DLBCL patients had significantly higher levels of the pro-inflammatory markers TNF, IL-8, CXCL9, APRIL, and particularly CXCL13 (median 796 vs. 206 pg/mL, p = 0.001), compared to RA controls. By including an extensive autoantibody panel of rheumatoid factor, IgG anti-CCP2, anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) fine-specificities, and other anti-modified protein antibodies, all RA-DLBCL patients were autoantibody seropositive. Yet, RA-DLBCL patients did not display significantly different autoantibody signatures compared to RA controls. The levels of immunoglobulin free light chains and C-reactive protein were similar in RA-DLBCL patients and RA controls. In conclusion, RA-DLBCL patients exhibit pro-inflammatory signatures with elevated markers that are important for B cells and may contribute to enhanced B-cell activation and promote lymphoma development.

In recent years, there have been notable advancements in the treatment of malignant lymphoma. However, a certain percentage of patients are unlikely to achieve a cure through chemotherapy alone. Therefore, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains a crucial curative treatment for malignant lymphoma. FluBu4, comprising fludarabine (Flu) combined with a myeloablative dose of intravenous busulfan (Bu; 12.8 mg/kg in total), is a widely used conditioning regimen for allo-HSCT, but its usefulness in malignant lymphoma (ML) has not been fully investigated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FluBu4 in allo-HSCT for lymphoma by comparing the outcomes of two conditioning regimens: FluBu4 and FluMel140. We used a Japanese national database from the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program to retrospectively analyze the first allo-HSCT for ML in patients aged ≥16 years. Allo-HSCT cases treated with posttransplant cyclophosphamide were excluded. Two groups, namely FluBu4 and FluMel140 were selected by propensity score matching (PSM) with a case ratio of 1:2. From 921 cases, 113 were selected by PSM for the FluBu4 group and 226 for the FluMel140 group. The median age was 54 (19 to 68) years, the median observation period of survivors was 33.8 months, and 145 (42.7%) had a history of autologous HSCT. There were no significant differences in patients' backgrounds between the two groups after PSM. Three-year overall survival (OS) was significantly worse for FluBu4 than for FluMel140 (28.0% versus 48.6%; P < .01). The 3-year cumulative relapse rate was comparable for FluBu4 and FluMel140 (40.1% versus 38.5%; P = .65). However, 3-year nonrelapse mortality was significantly higher for FluBu4 than for FluMel140 (35.3% versus 22.5%; P = .02). There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups in the cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) at day 100 after allo-HSCT and the 3-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD. While the common and major cause of death was the relapse of lymphoma, aGVHD, and noninfectious lung complications were observed more frequently with FluBu4 than with FluMel140. One-year cumulative incidence of interstitial pneumonia was significantly higher for FluBu4 than for FluMel140 (5.3% versus 0.4%; P = .03). FluBu4 use was associated with worse nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and OS in allo-HSCT for ML compared with FluBu4 and FluMel140 adjusted by PSM. Patients treated with FluBu4 had a higher incidence of noninfectious pulmonary complications and an increased number of associated deaths. A higher rate of NRM in the patients treated with FluBu4 was particularly evident in patients aged ≥60, and its use should be avoided in this patient population.

Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) is an autologous CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma. We present a multicenter retrospective study evaluating safety, efficacy, and resource use of liso-cel in the standard-of-care setting. Patients received commercial liso-cel at 7 US medical centers, and patient selection, toxicity management, and disease assessment followed institutional practices. Among 101 patients who received infusion, the median age was 71 years (35% aged ≥75 years), 68% had a Charlson comorbidity index score of ≥3, and 10% had secondary central nervous system involvement. Median number of prior therapies was 3; and because of comorbidities, 33% would have been ineligible for the TRANSCEND study. Bridging therapy was used in 60% (43% received polatuzumab-based treatment). Any-grade cytokine-release syndrome occurred in 49% (3% grade ≥3) with any-grade immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome occurring in 26% (10% grade ≥3). The overall response rate (ORR) to bridging therapy was 45%, with 18% achieving a complete response (CR). Following liso-cel infusion, the day 90 ORR was 66% (60% CR); and with a median follow-up of 15.5 months, 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 55% and 68%, respectively. A normal lactate dehydrogenase level before lymphodepletion was associated with improved PFS and OS. These analyses confirm similar efficacy and safety of commercial liso-cel compared with pivotal trial results. Notably, these outcomes were achieved in patients predominantly of advanced age and with significant comorbidities. Results also likely reflect advancements in patient selection, toxicity management, and the use of novel bridging strategies.

Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a distinct subtype of B-cell lymphoma, representing a clinical and therapeutic challenge due to its unique presentation, histopathological features, and treatment response. It primarily affects young adults, with a significant female preponderance, and is characterized by a large anterior mediastinal mass that causes compressive symptoms. Despite its aggressive nature, PMBCL patients have a favorable prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate exceeding 80% when early remission is achieved through first-line therapy. Drawing on the significant scientific therapeutic advances over recent years, this review focuses on the evolving treatment strategies for PMBCL patients. Anthracycline- and rituximab-containing regimens are the mainstays of first-line approaches, often followed by mediastinal radiation therapy. However, concerns regarding long-term toxicities have led to a reevaluation of treatment protocols, suggesting that radiotherapy can be safely omitted in patients who achieve a complete metabolic response after induction therapy, according to a PET-guided approach. Furthermore, new targeted therapies such as PD-1 inhibitors and CAR-T cell immunotherapy, have shown promising results in refractory or relapsed PMBCL.

Deauville scores (DS) from PET/CT imaging are increasingly being used to direct response-adjusted treatment strategies in lymphoma, including large B cell lymphomas (LBCL). We aimed to investigate the outcome of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) in LBCL and the role played by pre-transplant disease status, as determined by DS.

We performed a retrospective, observational study of adults treated with a T-cell depleted alloHSCT for de novo DLBCL or high-grade transformation.

Sixty-four patients received an alloHSCT. Forty-four had acute GvHD (38 had Grade 1-2). Overall non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 1 year was 20.31%. Patients ≥ 55 years had a higher cumulative incidence of NRM (66.67%) than those who were < 55 years (25.08%) (p = 0.00660). A 4-year relapse risk was 22.5%. Fourteen patients had disease relapse. The 4-year overall survival (OS) was 49.80%; median OS was 3.7 years (1.4-7.1). Patients with a pre-alloHSCT DS of 1-2 had a higher OS than a DS of 3-5 (61.97% vs. 34.23%; p = 0.0167); this was confirmed on multivariate analysis. Younger patients (< 55 years) had a higher OS than those ≥ 55 years (60.91% vs. 18.75%; p = 0.0246).

The pre-transplant Deauville score was predictive of the clinical outcome and patients with an absence of metabolically active disease pre-transplant had superior outcomes.

Several research have indicated the significant potential of the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) as a prognostic biomarker in lymphoma patients. However, there is some inconsistency in the findings of a few studies. Hence, to offer a thorough evaluation of the predictive significance of PNI in lymphoma patients, we performed a meta-analysis to examine the prognostic value of PNI for survival outcomes in lymphoma patients.

We conducted a comprehensive search for pertinent works published up until December 2023 in databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. We obtained hazard ratio (HR) data related to survival outcomes and computed aggregated HRs with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the correlation between PNI and both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in lymphoma patients.

By analyzing data from 1260 patients in 28 studies, we found that PNI levels were associated with prognosis in lymphoma patients. High PNI levels predicted that patients had longer OS (HR: 0.46, 95% CI 0.37-0.58, P < 0.05) and better PFS (HR: 0.56, 95% CI 0.45-0.70, P < 0.05). Subgroup analyses showed that the predictive ability of PNI for patient prognosis may differ depending on the type of lymphoma. In addition, we found that the critical PNI value had greater predictive potential at 40-45 and above 45.

Our study suggests a strong association between PNI and prognostic outcomes in lymphoma patients, indicating that PNI holds substantial prognostic value in this population.

Despite advances in treatment, approximately 15% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who achieve complete remission (CR) after first-line therapy will experience a relapse. However, there is no consensus on the optimal follow-up strategies for detecting relapse after achieving CR. This population-based study, based on the Danish Lymphoma Registry (LYFO), identified a total of 1634 patients diagnosed with DLBCL between 2010 and 2017, including 105 patients who achieved CR following first-line R-CHOP-like therapy and subsequently relapsed. The median follow-up time was 6 years (range 3-8 years). Most cases of relapse were symptomatic (83%), with B symptoms and peripheral lymphadenopathy being the most common. Asymptomatic relapses were identified through physical examination (1%), blood tests (3%), or imaging findings (13%). The proportion of relapses identified outside routine visits was 70%. Only 5% of scheduled routine visits led to a relapse diagnosis, whereas 74% of unscheduled visits initiated by the patient outside routine follow-up resulted in relapse detection. Our findings highlight that systematic, scheduled monitoring of patients in remission after first-line treatment contributes only modestly to the early detection of disease recurrence. Future studies should explore alternative methods of relapse surveillance rather than relying solely on pre-scheduled clinical follow-up.

Improving cancer outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) requires effective implementation of evidence-based strategies. This scoping review maps the evidence on lymphoma epidemiology, treatment challenges, and patient pathways in SSA from 2011 to 2022.

A comprehensive three-step search was conducted without language restrictions.

Eighty-four publications were included, 83% published after 2017. Southern and Eastern Africa led in output. Most studies were chart reviews (47.6%) and cohort studies (25%). NHL accounted for over 80% of cases, with an age-standardized rate (ASR) reaching 10.9/100,000, while HL had an ASR of 0.4-2.3/100,000. Compared to studies in Europe and US, SSA studies reported lower incidence rates, higher HIV comorbidity, and younger median ages. Diagnosis is often delayed, incomplete and lacks sub-classification with HIV and tuberculosis further complicating care. One-year survival rates are around 50% for NHL and over 75% for HL. Treatment is well-tolerated with an acceptable treatment-related mortality rate. However, outcomes are affected by diagnostic delays, late presentations, and treatment abandonment. Non-clinical aspects of care such as financial constraints negatively impact patient pathways.

Addressing diagnostic delays, misdiagnosis, and treatment abandonment is crucial. Strengthening care access, diagnostics, and integrating innovative strategies including a multidisciplinary approach and re-designing efficient clinical diagnostic pathways are vital.

Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) therapy is the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, detailed delineation of toxicity data is limited and has not been examined by age. We sought to examine adverse event data in patients receiving R-CHOP from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 50303 trial to determine if there were differences in grade 3+ toxicities by age cohort or ECOG performance status (PS), and if outcome was impacted by age cohort or toxicity occurrence.

CALGB 50303 was an intergroup phase III study for previously untreated patients with DLBCL that included R-CHOP as one of the trial arms. In the subset of 235 evaluable, seemingly fit patients receiving R-CHOP on this trial, data regarding the occurrence of grade 3+ hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities by treatment arm, as well as completion of protocol therapy, overall response rate (ORR), and survival outcome parameters were collected and analyzed for Alliance A151930.

Data were available for further analysis from 235 of 243 patients evaluable for safety, i.e., those who received R-CHOP therapy on this trial, with 165 being <65 years of age, and 70 ≥ 65 years of age. There was an increased rate of grade 3+ non-hematologic (but not hematologic) toxicities in the older age cohorts, after controlling for disease stage and performance status (p < 0.001). One-year and three-year overall survival (OS) were inferior in patients ≥65 years of age, compared to those <65 years of age; there was no difference in one-year or in three-year progression-free survival (PFS) between the age cohorts.

Standard frontline therapy with R-CHOP can be effectively administered to an older age cohort. We found more grade 3+ non-hematologic, but not hematologic, toxicities in older patients. These data can be used in clinical trial and real-world settings to identify at-risk DLBCL subgroups for which pro-active measures can be utilized to ensure completion of therapy and optimization of clinical outcomes.

gov Identifier: NCT00118209 (CALGB 50303).

Secondary central nervous system lymphoma (SCNSL) is a rare manifestation of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with a poor prognosis. We present updated data from a nationwide study on the incidence and clinical characteristics of SCNSL. The incidence of SCNSL was calculated considering death or relapse without SCNSL as competing risks. Risk factors associated with SCNSL were identified using a cause-specific Cox proportional hazards model. A total of 1972 patients with DLBCL were included, of which 68 (3.4%) experienced SCNSL at the first relapse. The crude 1- and 2-year cumulative incidence of SCNSL was 2.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.7) and 2.6% (95% CI, 2.0-3.4), respectively. For patients with a high-risk central nervous system international prognostic index (CNS-IPI) score, the 1- and 2-year cumulative incidence was 6.4% and 7.5%, respectively. The number and location of extranodal (EN) sites were the most significant predictors of SCNSL. Specific EN sites associated with an increased risk were the bone marrow, heart, kidneys/adrenal glands, ovaries, testes, and uterus. The median overall survival (OS) after SCNSL was 3.2 months. SCNSL within 6 months after the end of treatment (EOT) was associated with a higher baseline CNS-IPI score and worse OS than SCNSL >6 months after EOT. Patients with a combination of low-risk CNS-IPI and late-onset SCNSL had the most favorable prognosis. In conclusion, updated real-world population-based data on SCNSL at first relapse, adjusted for competing risks, demonstrated a lower incidence of SCNSL than previously reported, with the number and location of EN sites being the most significant predictors of SCNSL.

Antibody therapies are a crucial component of modern lymphoid malignancy treatment and an exciting area of active research. We performed a review of modern antibody therapies used in the treatment of lymphoid malignancies, with an emphasis on landmark studies and current directions. We describe the indications for rituximab, obinutuzumab, ADCs, and bispecific antibody therapies. Finally, we summarize early data from ongoing trials on emerging novel therapy combination regimens and discuss the role of machine learning in future therapy development.

Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of orelabrutinib combined with R-CHOP in patients with high-risk nongerminal center B-cell (non-GCB) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with extranodal involvement. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 35 patients who were seen at Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital and were immunohistochemically confirmed to have non-GCB DLBCL, had an International Prognostic Index score of 3 - 5, and confirmed to have ≥2 extranodal involvement on PET/CT. The treatment comprised the standard R-CHOP regimen combined with oral orelabrutinib (150 mg/day) for six cycles. In patients who developed neutropenia or grade 3 neutropenia with fever during treatment, administration of prophylactic pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 48 h after the end of chemotherapy was started on the next cycle. The endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS) time, overall survival (OS) time, and safety assessment. Results: The 35 eligible patients enrolled had a median age of 53 years (21 - 72 years) and a median follow-up time of 28 months (12 - 36 months) ; 19 patients had double-expressor (DE) status. The ORR was 88.6%, and the CR rate was 68.6%. The 2-year PFS and OS rates were 68.6% (95% CI 54.0% - 7.2%) and 87.5% (95% CI 76.7% - 100%), respectively. The 2-year PFS rate was significantly lower in patients with DE status than in those without DE status [54.4% (95% CI 35.4% - 84.2%) vs. 85.2% (95% CI 68.3% - 100%), P=0.048]. Serious adverse events included febrile neutropenia, pneumonia, and atrial flutter, but no treatment-related deaths. Conclusion: In patients with high-risk non-GCB DLBCL and extranodal involvement, the combination of orelabrutinib with R-CHOP regimen had good efficacy and manageable toxicity.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive hematopoietic neoplasm that affects humans as well as dogs. While previous studies on canine DLBCL (cDLBCL) have significantly advanced our understanding of the disease, the majority of this research has relied on whole-exome sequencing, which is limited in its ability to detect copy number aberrations and other genomic changes beyond coding regions. Furthermore, many of these studies lack sufficient clinical follow-up data, making it difficult to draw meaningful associations between genetic variants and patient outcomes. Our study aimed to characterize the mutational landscape of cDLBCL using whole-genome sequencing of matched tumor-normal samples obtained from a cohort of 43 dogs previously enrolled in a clinical trial for which longitudinal follow-up was available. We focused on identifying genes that were significantly or recurrently mutated with coding point mutations, copy number aberrations, and their associations with patient outcomes. We identified 26 recurrently mutated genes, 18 copy number gains, and 8 copy number losses. Consistent with prior studies, the most commonly mutated genes included TRAF3, FBXW7, POT1, TP53, SETD2, DDX3X and TBL1XR1. The most prominent copy number gain occurred on chromosome 13, overlapping key oncogenes such as MYC and KIT, while the most frequent deletion was a focal loss on chromosome 26, encompassing IGL, PRAME, GNAZ, RAB36, RSPH14, and ZNF280B. Notably, our set of recurrently mutated genes was significantly enriched with genes involved in epigenetic regulation. In particular, we identified hotspot mutations in two histone genes, H3C8, and LOC119877878, resulting in H3K27M alterations predicted to dysregulate gene expression. Finally, a survival analysis revealed that H3K27M mutations in H3C8 were associated with increased hazard ratios for progression-free survival. No copy number aberrations were associated with survival. These findings underscore the critical role of epigenetic dysregulation in cDLBCL and affirm the dog as a relevant large animal model for interrogating the biological activity of novel histone-modifying treatment strategies.

CD5+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a rare subtype characterized by an inferior outcome. While dose-dense therapy shows promising activity, the optimal management remains to be determined. To evaluate the benefit of consolidative autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT), we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 47 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed de novo CD5+ DLBCL. Of 19 patients ≤ 70 of age with age-adjusted International Prognostic Index 2-3, eight underwent upfront ASCT, and nine did not, despite preserved organ function and response after induction therapy. The remaining two, ineligible for ASCT due to early progression or comorbidities, had a dismal clinical course. Among younger 17 high-risk patients eligible for ASCT, ASCT was associated with better overall (p = 0.0327) and progression-free survival (p = 0.0184). Younger patients without ASCT demonstrated similar outcomes to older patients with similar risk profiles. ASCT could be considered for high-risk CD5+ DLBCL with a response after induction therapy.

There is limited knowledge of the long-term effects on the immune system after treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

This study included DLBCL patients from the Danish Lymphoma Registry who obtained complete remission (CR) after (R)-CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone)-like immunochemotherapy. Each R+ CHOP-like treated patient was matched to five comparators from the Danish background population and furthermore compared to R- CHOP-like treated patients. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and risk differences (RDs) were calculated for a wide range of infections, autoimmune conditions, and immune deficiencies (AC-IDs) combined and by subtypes.

R+ CHOP-like treated patients had a higher risk of infections overall (IRR 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-1.7: 10-year RD 5.0%, 95% CI 2.2%-7.8%) and for a majority of the subtypes than matched comparators. Likewise, they had a higher risk of AC-IDs overall (IRR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.7; RD 0.8%, 95% CI 0.7%-2.2%) than matched comparators, however only of clinical relevance for three subtypes; autoimmune diseases of the endocrine system, sarcoidosis and immune deficiencies. The addition of rituximab to CHOP-like therapy did not alter the incidence rates (IR) of infections overall (IRR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.3) or AC-IDs overall (IRR 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.3) compared to CHOP-like therapy alone, although the IR for respiratory infections was significantly elevated (IRR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1). However, an increased use of IVIG treatment was observed among R+ CHOP survivors.

R-CHOP-like treated patients face an increased risk of infections and AC-IDs overall compared with the background population. The risk of infections and AC-IDs did not change overall after the addition of rituximab to CHOP, however, an increased risk of respiratory infections is notable. These findings could highlight the need for expanded vigilance and prophylaxis strategies.

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (wbMRI) allows general assessment of systemic cancers including lymphomas without radiation burden.

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of wbMRI in the staging of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), determine the value of individual MRI sequences, and assess patients' concerns with wbMRI.

In this single-center prospective study, adult patients newly diagnosed with systemic DLBCL underwent wbMRI on a 3T scanner [diffusion weighted images with background suppression (DWIBS), T2, short tau inversion recovery (STIR), contrast-enhanced T1] and fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) (reference standard). The involvement of 12 nodal regions and extranodal sites was evaluated on wbMRI and PET/CT. The utility of wbMRI sequences was rated on a five-point scale (0 = not useful, 4 = very useful). Patients received a questionnaire regarding wbMRI.

Of 60 eligible patients, 14 (23%) were enrolled and completed the study. The sensitivity of wbMRI in the nodal involvement (182 nodal sites) was 0.84, with 0.99 specificity, positive predictive value of 0.96, negative predictive value of 0.97, and 0.97 accuracy. PET/CT and wbMRI were concordant both in extranodal involvement (13 instances) and staging (κ = 1.0). The mean scores of the utility of MRI sequences were 3.71 ± 0.73 for DWIBS, 2.64 ± 0.84 for T1, 2.14 ± 0.77 for STIR, and 1.29 ± 0.73 for T2 (P < 0.0001). Patients were mostly concerned about the enclosed environment and duration of the MRI examination (27% of patients).

The wbMRI exhibited excellent sensitivity and specificity in staging DLBCL. DWIBS and contrast-enhanced T1 were rated as the most useful sequences. Patients were less willing to undergo wbMRI as a second examination parallel to PET/CT, especially owing to the long duration and the enclosed environment.

Dexrazoxane has been studied for its ability to prevent anthracycline-induced cardiac dysfunction (AICD) in several trials but its use in clinical practice remains limited. This is related to the low to moderate quality of the generated evidence, safety concerns and restricted prescribing indications. Additional randomized trials are needed before this drug can be routinely integrated into cardio-oncology clinical practice.

To describe the rationale and design of the HOVON 170 DLBCL - ANTICIPATE trial. This trial aims to establish the efficacy and safety of dexrazoxane for the primary prevention of AICD in patients diagnosed with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with six cycles R-CHOP21 chemo-immunotherapy.

This is a multicenter, parallel-group, open-label, phase III trial, randomizing 324 patients between either no cardioprotective treatment or dexrazoxane from the first R-CHOP cycle. The primary and co-primary endpoints are the incidence of AICD within 12 months of registration and the percentage of patients with complete metabolic remission at the end-of-treatment PET-CT respectively. The trial is registered at the EU Clinical Trials Register (EU-CT number 2023-505377-32) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06220032).

The medical research ethics committee approved the trial in May 2024. Recruitment has started in September 2024 and is expected to last for three years.

This trial is poised to contribute crucial evidence concerning the efficacy and safety on the use of dexrazoxane in the primary prevention of AICD. The trial is anticipated to address critical knowledge gaps and offer important insights into the value of dexrazoxane in cardio-oncology practice.

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of polatuzumab vedotin-rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (pola-R-CHP) in CD20-positive patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in China.

A Markov model was constructed to analyse the cost-effectiveness of two strategies in CD20-positive patients with previously untreated DLBCL over a lifetime horizon: (1) pola-R-CHP and (2) rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP). The clinical outcomes were obtained from the POLARIX(NCT03274492), SCHOLAR-1, ZUMA-7(NCT03391466) and TRANSFORM(NCT03575351) trials. Costs were derived from the Chinese official websites and published literature, and utility values were obtained from the published literature. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at triple the 2023 Chinese per capita gross domestic product of US$38 042.49/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Uncertainty was addressed using sensitivity analyses. The scenario analyses were also conducted.

Chinese healthcare system perspective.

A hypothetical cohort of adult patients presenting with CD20-positive, patients with previously untreated DLBCL.

Pola-R-CHP versus R-CHOP.

The main outcomes of the study were QALYs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental net-health benefit (INHB).

In China, the ICER and INHB of pola-R-CHP compared with R-CHOP were US$77 036.33/QALY and -1.11 QALYs, respectively. The ICER was above the WTP threshold. Outcomes were most responsive to the price of pola. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated that pola-R-CHP had a low probability of being cost-effective under the current WTP threshold. The scenario analyses demonstrated that when the price of pola fell by more than 32.5% to less than US$33.19/mg, the economic probability of pola-R-CHP was greater than 50% in previously untreated CD20-positive patients with DLBCL in China.

Pola-R-CHP is not cost-effective in the first-line treatment for previously untreated CD20-positive DLBCL in China. A value-based price for the cost of pola is less than US$33.19/mg.

High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma (HGBCL) with gene rearrangements in MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 is an aggressive malignancy usually presenting in advanced stages. Current recommendations suggest the use of regimens more intensive than R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, prednisone), which are based on retrospective studies and single-arm prospective trials that included patients who are mostly in the advanced stage, and did not receive consolidation radiotherapy. The optimal approach and treatment of HGBCL, whether limited-stage (LS) or advanced-stage, remains to be determined. Here we describe the promising outcomes of three patients with LS and low IPI HGBCL with the use of R-CHOP as induction chemotherapy regimen, which was followed by consolidation radiotherapy. Three women, 54-, 60-, and 64-years of age diagnosed to have HGBCL with MYC, and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements, with Ann Arbor stages I-IIE were included in this case series. All three patients had complete metabolic response to 6 cycles of R-CHOP and was subsequently treated with consolidation involved site radiotherapy (ISRT; total dose 30-36 Gy). Chemotherapy and radiotherapy were tolerated very well. All patients remain to be in remission, with the longest being at 23 months. Outcomes of patients with HGBCL generally remain to be poor, but this may not be the case for patients with limited-stage disease and favorable clinicopathologic risk profile. Nevertheless, the treatment of HGBCL is currently evolving and more studies are needed to determine the ideal approach and preferred chemotherapy regimen. Also, more studies are needed to elucidate the potential role of consolidation radiotherapy in patients with limited-stage HGBCL to improve survival outcomes. Findings of this case series suggest that patients with LS HGBCL may still derive benefit from R-CHOP followed by consolidation ISRT, but prospective trials are needed to confirm this.

Anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy has been a breakthrough in treatment of primary refractory or relapsed large B-cell lymphoma (r/r LBCL) and is poised to supplant previous second line of high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT). However, in clinical practice, high risk patients with chemoimmunotherapy sensitive disease continue to receive salvage chemoimmunotherapy or cannot access CAR-T in a timely manner and thus may still proceed to HDT/ASCT. Little is known about clinical outcomes of CAR-T in patients who receive HDT/ASCT compared to those who are transplant-naïve.

We conducted a retrospective study of patients with r/r LBCL who previously underwent HDT/ASCT or were transplant-naïve (n = 97) and received axicabtagene ciloleucel after at least 2 prior therapy lines between 1/1/2018 to 12/31/2021. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and cumulative incidence of relapse/progression.

82 (84.5%) patients were transplant-naïve and 15 (15.5%) previously received HDT/ASCT. No differences were found in the incidence of high-grade cytokine release syndrome or immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, length of hospital admission, or incidence of cytopenia at day 30. 90-day response, PFS, OS, cumulative incidence of relapse/progression, and NRM were not different. Factors that adversely affected outcomes were prior bridging therapy, elevated LDH or thrombocytopenia at time of lymphodepleting chemotherapy, and worse ECOG performance status.

Prior treatment with HDT/ASCT does not compromise the safety and efficacy of anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy, suggesting a continued role for HDT/ASCT in treatment of select patients with r/r DLBCL.

Currently, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy represents a highly effective approach for relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas. However, it also carries treatment-related risks. Limited data are available on the risks associated with CART therapy in patients with gastrointestinal involvement in B-cell lymphomas. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to address this gap in knowledge.

During the period from May 2019 to August 2022, a total of 26 patients recurrent/refractory with recurrent/refractory B-cell lymphoma involving the gastrointestinal tract enrolled. Pathology confirmed CD19 antigen expression in tumor tissues. The disease status of patients who failed multiple lines of therapy was progressive disease (PD). Before CART cell infusion, patients received an FC regimen (fludarabine and cyclophosphamide) lymphodepletion. Quantitative PCR and flow cytometry were adopted for monitoring CART cell kinetics and function, with a focus on gastrointestinal AEs during treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) of the 26 patients was 61.5% (16/26), while the complete response rate (CR) was 23.1% (6/26). Their median follow-up time was 22.49 months, while the medians of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 10.88 and 5.47 months, respectively. The 1-year OS and PFS rates were 45% and 42.3%, respectively. The prevalence of gastrointestinal complications was 21/26 (80.7%), including gastrointestinal hemorrhage in 11/26 (42.3%), emesis and diarrhea in 9/26 (34.6%), as well as intestinal obstruction in 2/26 (7.7%). A total of three patients (3/26, 11.5%) died of gastrointestinal hemorrhage. The gastrointestinal hemorrhage group exhibited markedly lower ORR and inferior OS compared to the non-hemorrhage group.

Generally, the CART cell therapy is valid in relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma with gastrointestinal involvement, but gastrointestinal bleeding is a unique risk factor that requires special attention, particularly in patients with high gastrointestinal tumor burden, as it is associated with poor efficacy and survival.

Lymphoma in elderly patients has unique treatment challenges due to baseline co-morbidities, nutrition status, impairment in functional capacities and fitness. While geriatric-specific assessment can be used to tailor treatment decisions, lack of adequate representation of elderly patients in lymphoma clinical trials impairs generalizability. Radiation treatment has traditionally been associated with high response and local control for lymphomas. The volume and dose of radiation in lymphomas has gradually decreased over the decades, which has led to improved compliance and lower toxicities. The use of radiation in Hodgkin and aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas has allowed for reduction in the number systemic therapy cycles, which is important in elderly patients who may be at high risk for treatment-related adverse events. Current strategies include a risk-adapted approach with minimal chemo-immunotherapy followed by radiation treatment, with dose adapted by response. Here, we provide a review of the literature regarding the role of radiation in the management of elderly patients with lymphoma, especially in follicular lymphoma, diffuse large cell lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of B-cell lymphoma, predominantly afflicting older adults. There remains a notable absence of data regarding DLBCL in older adults in Latin America.

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 608 newly diagnosed Latin American patients with DLBCL aged ≥65 years.

The median age at diagnosis was 74 years (range: 65-96 years), 51 % were female, 36 % had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≥2, and 65 % had advanced disease. The most common regimens used were standard-dose R-CHOP (n = 420, 69 %), R-CVP (n = 77, 12 %), R-mini-CHOP (n = 74, 12 %), and CHOP/CVP (n = 30, 5 %). With a median follow-up of 60 months (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 38.7-75.2 months), the five-year overall survival (OS) rate was 50 % (95 % CI, 43-58). An ECOG PS ≥2 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.93; 95 % CI 1.51-2.46; p < 0.01), advanced clinical stage (HR 1.46; 95 % CI 1.12-1.91; p < 0.01), increased serum lactic dehydrogenase level (HR 1.48; 95 % CI 1.16-1.87; p < 0.01), and albumin level < 3.5 mg/dL (HR 1.64; 95 % CI 1.29-2.10; p < 0.01) were associated with an inferior OS. Using anthracyclines (HR 0.50; 95 % CI 0.38-0.66; p < 0.01) and using rituximab (HR 0.51; 95 % CI 0.36-0.73; p < 0.01) were independently associated with a superior OS.

In a large cohort of Latin American older patients with DLBCL, therapy and outcome patterns are similar to those reported internationally. The lack of standardized geriatric assessments in Latin America represents an essential area for research to better stratify older patients with DLBCL deemed to be at higher risk for toxicity.

Double-expressor diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DE-DLBCL) has a poor prognosis, and optimal treatment strategies remain unclear. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of RCHOP, R2-CHOP (RCHOP plus lenalidomide), and RCHOP plus Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (BTKi) in DE-DLBCL treatment.

Data from 213 DE-DLBCL patients treated from January 2019 and February 2024. Among them, 112 received R-CHOP, 65 received R2-CHOP, and 36 received R-CHOP plus BTKi. We evaluated clinical characteristics, overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) for each groups.

Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups. ORRs were 95.5 % for R-CHOP, 96.9 % for R2-CHOP, and 97.2 % for R-CHOP plus BTKi, with CR rates of 76.5 %, 80 %, and 75 %, respectively. BTKi significantly improved PFS (p=0.033) but not affect OS (p=0.165). Lenalidomide showed no benefit in PFS (p=0.153) or OS (p=0.351). With median follow-up times of 20.6 months for R-CHOP, 23.5 months for R2-CHOP, and 17.6 months for R-CHOP plus BTKi, the 1-year PFS rates were 73.6 %, 82.2 %, and 93.3 %, and the 1-year OS rates were 96.2 %, 93.2 %, and 100 %, respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events included leukopenia, neutropenia, and anemia, and thrombocytopenia, with no significant differences among groups.

The addition of BTK inhibitor enhances progression-free survival in DE-DLBCL, especially in advanced-stage patients, without introducing new severe adverse reactions. In contract, adding lenalidomide does not offer additional efficacy or survival benefits.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, characterized by its aggressive nature and heterogeneity. Despite significant advances in understanding DLBCL pathogenesis, there is still a need to elucidate the intricate mechanisms involved in disease progression and identify novel therapeutic targets. Extracellular vesicles (EVs), including exosomes and microvesicles, have emerged as crucial mediators of intercellular communication in various physiological and pathological processes, including cancer. In recent years, evidence has suggested that EVs play a vital role in DLBCL biology by facilitating the exchange of genetic material, especially miRNAs, and proteins and lipids between tumor cells, immune cells, and the tumor microenvironment. We summarize and discuss the biological functions of EVs in DLBCL and their effects on the tumor microenvironment, highlighting their influence on DLBCL pathobiology, immune evasion, angiogenesis, and drug resistance. We also investigated EVs' diagnostic and prognostic potential as circulating biomarkers in DLBCL, emphasizing their utility in the non-invasive monitoring of the disease status and treatment response. Understanding the complex interplay between EVs and DLBCL may open up new avenues for personalized medicine, improve patient stratification, and facilitate the development of innovative therapeutic interventions in this devastating hematological malignancy.