Long-term medication with valproic acid has been associated with acute pancreatitis. The purpose of this report is to gain insight into the features of this pancreatitis. A preregistered literature search (CRD42023438294) was performed on the National Library of Medicine, Excerpta Medica, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Patients with alcohol abuse disorder, gallstone disease, hypertriglyceridemia or hypercalcemia, patients with acute valproic acid intoxication, and patients with a pre-existing pancreatitis were excluded. For the final analysis, we retained 73 reports published between 1979 and 2023, which described 125 subjects (83 children and 42 adults predominantly affected by an epilepsy) with an acute pancreatitis related to valproic acid. The diagnosis was made 11 (3.0-24) months (median and interquartile range) after starting valproic acid. One hundred and five cases (84%) recovered and twenty (16%) died. Sex, age, dosage or circulating level of valproic acid, latency time, prevalence of intellectual disability, and antiepileptic co-medication were similar in cases with and without a lethal outcome. Nineteen subjects were rechallenged with valproic acid after recovery: sixteen (84%) cases developed a further episode of pancreatitis. In conclusion, pancreatitis associated with valproic acid presents at any time during treatment and has a high fatality rate.

With over 100000 hospital admissions per annum, acute pancreatitis remains the leading gastrointestinal cause of hospitalization in the United States and has far-reaching impact well beyond. It has become increasingly recognized that drug-induced pancreatitis (DIP), despite accounting for less than 3% of all cases, represents an important and growing though often inconspicuous cause of acute pancreatitis. Nevertheless, knowledge of DIP is often curtailed by the limited availability of evidence needed to implicate given agents, especially for non-prescription medications. Indeed, the majority of available data is derived from case reports, case series, or case control studies. Furthermore, the mechanism of injury and causality for many of these drugs remain elusive as a definitive correlation is generally not established (< 10% of cases). Several classification systems have been proposed, but no single system has been widely adopted, and periodic updates are required in light of ongoing pharmacologic expansion. Moreover, infrequently prescribed medications or those available over-the-counter (including herbal and other alternative remedies) are often overlooked as a potential culprit of acute pancreatitis. Herein, we review the ever-increasing diversity of DIP and the potential mechanisms of injury with the goal of raising awareness regarding the nature and magnitude of this entity. We believe this manuscript will aid in increasing both primary and secondary prevention of DIP, thus ultimately facilitating more expedient diagnosis and a decrease in DIP-related morbidity.

As psoriasis is a common skin disorder, knowledge of the factors that may induce, trigger, or exacerbate the disease is of primary importance in clinical practice. Drug intake is a major concern in this respect, as new drugs are constantly being added to the list of factors that may influence the course of the disease. We report a patient with a psoriasiform drug eruption associated with the use of sodium valproate. Physicians should be aware of this type of reaction. Early detection of these cases has practical importance since the identification and elimination of the causative drug are essential for therapy success.

The diagnosis of drug-induced acute pancreatitis often is difficult to establish. Although some medications have been shown to cause acute pancreatitis with a large body of evidence, including rechallenge, some medications have been attributed as a cause of acute pancreatitis merely by a single published case report in which the investigators found no other cause. In addition, some medications reported to have caused acute pancreatitis have obvious patterns of presentation, including the time from initiation to the development of disease (latency). There also appear to be patterns in the severity of disease. After reviewing the literature, we have classified drugs that have been reported to cause acute pancreatitis based on the published weight of evidence for each agent and the pattern of clinical presentation. Based on our analysis of the level of evidence, 4 classes of drugs could be identified. Class I drugs include medications in which at least 1 case report described a recurrence of acute pancreatitis with a rechallenge with the drug. Class II drugs include drugs in which there is a consistent latency in 75% or more of the reported cases. Class III drugs include drugs that had 2 or more case reports published, but neither a rechallenge nor a consistent latency period. Class IV drugs were similar to class III drugs, but only 1 case report had been published. Our analysis allows an evidence-based approach when suspecting a drug as causing acute pancreatitis.

Acute pancreatitis is rarely seen in children, and, in contrast to cases in adults, it is often drug induced. One possible medication is the antiepileptic drug valproic acid (VPA), which is commonly prescribed for generalized and focal epilepsy, migraine, neuropathic pain, and bipolar disorder. The common side effects associated with VPA are typically benign, but less common but more serious adverse effects may occur. These include hepatotoxicity, hyperammonemic encephalopathy, coagulation disorders, and pancreatitis. Since 1979, a few cases of pancreatitis induced by VPA have been published in the medical literature.

We mailed a questionnaire to all members of the "German Section of the International League against Epilepsy," asking about VPA-induced side effects. We also reviewed the medical literature for VPA-induced pancreatitis.

Fifty-three publications (90 patients) published from 1979 to 2005 were found. Our survey in Germany, however, yielded 16 cases of pancreatitis from 1994 to 2003 whose original files we could study in detail. None of these patients had been published previously.

The difference between 90 patients reported worldwide from 1979 to 2005 and the 16 new documented cases from only Germany over 10 years corroborates that the occurrence of this severe side effect is under reported.

To examine whether acute pancreatitis is associated with use of valproic acid. Through the population-based hospital discharge registries we identified all patients with an incident hospitalization of acute pancreatitis in the counties of North Jutland (data 1991 to 2003), Aarhus (data 1996 to 2003), and Viborg (data 1998 to 2003), Denmark. From the Danish Civil Registration System, we selected 10 sex-matched and age-matched population controls per case on the basis of risk set sampling. All prescriptions of valproic acid and other antiepileptic drugs within 90 days (present users) or 91 to 365 days (past users) before hospital admission with acute pancreatitis, or index date among controls, were collected from the prescription databases in the counties. We performed conditional logistic regression to estimate the relative risk of acute pancreatitis after exposure to valproic acid or other antiepileptic drugs, adjusting for gallstone diseases, alcohol-related diseases, hyperlipidemia, and hypercalcemia. We included 3083 cases of acute pancreatitis and 30,830 population controls. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for acute pancreatitis in present users of valproic acid was 1.9 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-3.3); for past users, the adjusted OR was 2.6 (95% CI, 0.8-8.7). For users of other antiepileptic drugs, the corresponding adjusted ORs were 1.6 (95% CI, 1.2-2.2) and 1.8 (95% CI, 1.1-3.0). Use of valproic acid is associated with an elevated relative risk estimate for acute pancreatitis, but it was not materially different from past use or use of other antiepileptic drugs. Therefore, our data challenge the hypothesis that valproic acid is an independent risk factor for acute pancreatitis.

A 12-year-old boy developed pancreatitis, complicated by a pancreatic pseudocyst, as an adverse reaction to valproic acid (VPA) treatment for epilepsy. Pancreatitis subsided within three weeks after discontinuation of VPA. The pancreatic pseudocyst was managed without surgery and resolved spontaneously in four weeks. Valproic acid was concluded to be the most probable cause, since no other explanation was found. According to the literature VPA is a rare but known cause of pancreatitis. A computer-assisted literature search revealed seven previously reported cases of VPA-induced pancreatitis complicated by a pancreatic pseudocyst. Six of these patients were under 20 years of age. Four patients were treated conservatively; three needed cystostomy or external drainage. All patients recovered. Patients using VPA, especially children, presenting with acute abdominal pain should be suspected of valproic acid-induced pancreatitis. If VPA induced pancreatitis is complicated by a pseudocyst, conservative treatment should be the first line of treatment.

In the past 6 years, 11 children on valproic acid have developed pancreatitis in our children's hospital. Valproic acid has been used as one of the primary anticonvulsants for generalized seizures in children for the past 25 years. A literature review reveals mostly singular reports of pancreatitis over the past decade. The charts of the 11 patients with valproic acid-induced pancreatitis were reviewed. Dosage, valproic acid serum levels, duration of therapy, and concomitant medications were examined. Families were contacted by telephone to determine the formulation (brand name vs generic) of valproic acid at the time of diagnosis. Six girls and five boys were studied. The ages ranged from 4 to 16 years. Eight of 11 children presented with an acute abdomen. Unexpectedly, three children presented with a flulike illness. Serum lipase values ranged from 341 to 5576 U/L (normal range < 190 U/L). The dose of valproic acid ranged from 20 to 50 mg/kg. Serum levels ranged from 334 to 884 micromol/L (therapeutic range 350-800 micromol/L). Six of the patients were on monotherapy. Seven children were on brand-name drugs. Four of the children had an abnormal neurologic syndromic diagnosis (West syndrome, Rett syndrome, Lowe syndrome, and Angelman's syndrome). Six of the children had a history of drug allergies with a skin rash. Valproic acid was reintroduced in one child and resulted in a second episode of pancreatitis. Resolution of symptoms usually took several weeks following discontinuation of the drug. No association was found with valproic acid dosage, type of preparation, serum levels, duration of therapy, or presence of concomitant medications. Pancreatitis is a severe adverse effect of valproic acid use in children. Dose, duration of treatment, serum valproic acid levels, generic preparation, and the presence of concomitant antiepileptic drugs do not appear to be risk factors. Children with known drug sensitivity might be at risk. Lipase levels at the time of an acute abdomen or a flulike illness in epileptic children taking valproic acid can reveal early stages of pancreatitis and are recommended.

Valproic acid (VPA) is a commonly prescribed medication approved for use in the United States for epilepsy, migraine, and bipolar disorder. Although the common adverse effects associated with VPA are typically benign, less common but more serious adverse effects can occur. These include hepatotoxicity, teratogenicity, possible polycystic ovaries with the potential for sterility or carcinogenesis, and pancreatitis. A characteristic clinical profile has been determined for several of these adverse effects. We report four children with VPA-induced pancreatitis, one of which was fatal, and review the literature. Three of these children presented within a 4-year period (1995-1999) at the same institution. Because previous reviews have included either a small number of patients, or both pediatric and adult patients, we reviewed only pediatric cases to minimize any effect from adults with more serious co-existing medical illnesses. We attempted to determine the following: (1) if there are any characteristics that are predictive of pancreatitis and whether it will be fatal; (2) whether different clinical and laboratory characteristics exist for nonfatal vs fatal cases; and (3) if a specific pediatric patient profile, similar to that with VPA associated hepatotoxity or polycystic ovary-androgenism syndrome, could be identified.

Acute valproic acid intoxication is an increasing problem, accounting for more than 5000 calls to the American Association of Poison Control Centers in 2000. The purpose of this paper is to review the pharmacology and toxicology of valproic acid toxicity. Unlike earlier antiepileptic agents, valproic acid appears to function neither through sodium channel inhibition nor through direct gamma-aminobutyric acid agonism, but through an indirect increase in regional brain gamma-aminobutyric acid levels. Manifestations of acute valproic acid toxicity are myriad, and reflect both exaggerated therapeutic effect and impaired intermediary metabolism. Central nervous system depression is the most common finding noted in overdose, and may progress to coma and respiratory depression. Cerebral edema has also been observed. Although hepatotoxicity is rare in the acute overdose setting, pancreatitis and hyperammonemia have been reported. Metabolic and hematologic derangements have also been described. Management of acute valproic acid ingestion requires supportive care and close attention to the airway. The use of controversial adjunctive therapies, including extracorporeal drug elimination and L-carnitine supplementation, will be discussed.

Black box warnings for valproic acid caution clinicians of the potential for fatal hepatotoxicity and teratogenicity. Since 1979, case reports of pancreatitis induced by valproic acid have been published in the medical literature. As a result, pancreatitis was added to the black box warnings for valproic acid. We performed searches of MEDLINE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and found valproic acid-induced pancreatitis in 45 patients from 31 published articles. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of these patients are summarized. Recommendations for monitoring the potential for pancreatitis to develop in patients receiving valproic acid therapy are described, as are potential mechanisms for inducement of pancreatitis by valproic acid.

Few data exist about the incidence of drug-induced pancreatitis in the general population. 20 cases of drug-related pancreatitis were reported in Switzerland over a period of 12 years. The proportion of cases of pancreatitis caused by drugs is estimated to be around 2% in the general population, with much higher proportions in specific subpopulations, such as children and patients who are HIV positive. The literature about drug-induced pancreatitis consists mainly of anecdotal case reports. Clear evidence of a definite association with pancreatitis, by means of rechallenge tests, or consistent case reports, supported by animal experiments or data on the incidence of acute pancreatitis in drug trials exists for didanosine, valproic acid (sodium valproate), aminosalicylates, estrogen, calcium, anticholinesterases and sodium stibogluconate. An association with drug-induced pancreatitis is likely but not definitely proven for thiazide diuretics, pentamidine, ACE inhibitors, asparaginase, vinca alkaloids, some nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and clozapine. Pancreatitis is possibly caused by azathioprine, furosemide (frusemide), tetracycline, metronidazole, isoniazid, rifampicin (rifampin), sulphonamides, cyclosporin and some antineoplastic drugs. Many drugs have been reported to be associated with acute pancreatitis. However, lack of rechallenge evidence, consistent statistical data, or evidence from experimental studies on a possible mechanism prohibit definitive conclusions about most of them. The high incidence of concurrent illnesses known to induce acute pancreatitis, makes a trigger role or co-factor role for the drug seem most likely.

The discovery of pancreatitis in two children with methylmalonic acidemia led us to review the experience with pancreatitis in a large number of patients with organic acidemias to determine whether pancreatitis is an important complication of these disorders.

Case series.

Pediatric metabolism services at five tertiary care centers.

Records of all patients with organic acidemias followed at the five institutions during the past 10 years were reviewed. Pancreatitis was recognized by symptoms and laboratory findings and confirmed by imaging studies, surgery, or autopsy. At three institutions all cases of pancreatitis in children younger than 10 years were reviewed.

Nine children with pancreatitis (seven with acute and two with chronic cases) were identified among 108 children with branched-chain organic acidemias. They ranged in age from 13 months to 9 years. Five had methylmalonic acidemia, three had isovaleric acidemia, and one had maple syrup urine disease. There were three deaths; acute hemorrhagic pancreatitis occurred in two children, and chronic pancreatitis was found at autopsy in a third. All three patients with isovaleric acidemia and pancreatitis were identified after the occurrence of pancreatitis. The survey of pancreatitis at three institutions found 57 other patients (none with an inborn error) in addition to three patients with inborn errors included in this study.

Acute or chronic pancreatitis may complicate branched-chain organic acidemias and must be considered in the assessment of patients with these disorders who have acute clinical deterioration and vomiting, abdominal pain, encephalopathy or shock, or milder symptoms. Conversely, an inborn error of organic acid metabolism should be considered in children with pancreatitis of unknown origin.

To assess the clinical characteristics of valproate (VPA)-associated pancreatitis, information from three sources was gathered: (a) a survey among 507 physicians with a special interest in treatment of epilepsy, (b) a review of the authors' patient population, and (c) a review of the literature. Of 366 physicians answering the survey, 53 (14.5%) reported a case of pancreatitis. Thirty-nine cases were available for review (24 from the medical literature, 12 from the survey, and 3 from the authors). Pancreatitis appeared to be more frequent in young persons (mean age 16.4 years) but may occur at any age. The highest risk appears to exist during the first months of treatment: 43.8% of the cases developed during the first 3 months, and 68.8% developed during the first year. Seventy-six percent of patients were receiving polytherapy, and 41% had some form of associated chronic encephalopathy. In most patients, the reaction was rapidly reversible when VPA was discontinued. It was severe in 6 patients, with 3 deaths reported. Rechallenge with VPA was attempted in 9 patients, with a high incidence of relapses. Asymptomatic elevation of serum amylase in patients receiving VPA was reported by 40 (10.9%) of the physicians surveyed. Awareness of the problem and early discontinuation of VPA may be effective in preventing serious reactions.

We report a 4-month-old boy with massive ascites in whom a diagnosis of pancreatitis was made on a raised ascitic amylase level after two inconclusive laparotomies. He developed a pseudocyst which was managed with repeated percutaneous needle aspirations, nutrition being maintained intravenously. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) demonstrated a congenital intra-pancreatic cyst. He thrived after operation drainage for recurrent pseudocyst, but repeat ERCP shows that the cyst in the head of the pancreas remains. Pancreatic ascites is rare in children and diagnosis is frequently delayed. A third of reported cases in childhood present in the first year of life. A search for the underlying cause should include an ERCP to demonstrate abnormalities of the pancreaticobiliary ducts.