• Heplisav-B
• adjuvant
• dialysis
• emergency-only hemodialysis
• hepatitis B vaccine
• hepatitis B virus

• Adult
• Humans
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Female
• Hepatitis B Vaccines/adverse effects
• Seroconversion
• Safety-net Providers
• Hepatitis B/prevention & control
• Hepatitis B/chemically induced
• Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy
• Hepatitis B Antibodies

Patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or end-stage renal disease receiving dialysis have an increased risk of developing malignancies, but few data are available on cancer in patients with both conditions. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine the incidence of selected malignancies and identify their potential risk factors in HIV-infected dialysis patients.

This study was a nationwide cohort analysis using the US Renal Data System. Participants included all HIV-infected patients starting dialysis from 2005 to 2011. HIV status, comorbidities and malignancies were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Descriptive statistics and generalized linear models quantifying risk factors were performed for the overall cohort and the three most common malignancies.

Overall, 6641 HIV-infected dialysis patients were identified, with 543 (8.2%) carrying a malignancy diagnosis. The most common malignancies were non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL, 25%), Kaposi sarcoma (KS, 16%) and colorectal cancer (13%). Factors increasing the risk of any malignancy diagnosis included: history of cancer [adjusted relative risk (aRR) = 5.37], two or more acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-defining opportunistic infections (ADOIs) (aRR = 3.11), one ADOI (aRR = 2.23), cirrhosis (aRR = 2.20), male sex (aRR = 1.54) and hepatitis B (aRR = 1.52). For NHL and colorectal cancer, history of cancer (aRR = 7.05 and 9.80, respectively) was the most significant risk factor. For KS, two or more ADOIs (aRR = 6.78) was the largest risk factor.

Over 8% of HIV-infected dialysis patients developed a malignancy. History of cancer and ADOIs were major risk factors, underscoring the significance of immune dysregulation in malignancy development.

• ESRD
• HIV
• US Renal Data System
• cancer
• chronic kidney disease
• dialysis
• epidemiology
• risk factors

To investigate the risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with and without nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy.

This nationwide cohort study included 103444 Taiwanese CKD adults without hepatitis C virus infection from the Taiwan Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005 between 1997 and 2012. We identified 2916 CKD patients who acquired HBV infection and did not receive NAs (untreated cohort), and they were propensity-matched 1:4 with 11664 uninfected counterparts. We also identified 442 CKD patients who acquired HBV infection and received NAs (treated cohort), and they were propensity-matched 1:3 with 1326 untreated counterparts. The association between HBV infection, NA use, and ESRD was analyzed using competing risk analysis.

Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed a 1.67-fold higher risk (P < 0.0001) of ESRD in the untreated cohort (16-year cumulative incidence, 10.1%) than in the matched uninfected cohort (16-year cumulative incidence, 6.6%), which was independent of cirrhosis or diabetes. The treated cohort (16-year cumulative incidence, 2.2%) had an 87% lower ESRD risk (P < 0.0001) compared with the matched untreated cohort (16-year cumulative incidence, 11.9%). The number needed to treat for one fewer ESRD after NA use at 12 years was 12. Multivariable stratified analyses verified these associations in all subgroups.

This study suggests that untreated HBV infection and NA therapy are associated with increased and decreased risk of ESRD, respectively, in CKD patients. Identification of HBV status and targeted monitoring for ESRD development are important in CKD patients living in HBV-endemic areas.

• Hepatitis B virus
• Chronic kidney disease
• End-stage renal disease
• Nucleos(t)ide analogue
• Cohort study

• Adult
• Aged
• Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use
• Disease Progression
• Female
• Hepatitis B/complications
• Hepatitis B/drug therapy
• Hepatitis B/virology
• Hepatitis B virus/isolation & purification
• Humans
• Incidence
• Kidney Failure, Chronic/epidemiology
• Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Renal Dialysis/statistics & numerical data
• Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications
• Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/pathology
• Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy
• Retrospective Studies
• Risk Assessment
• Taiwan/epidemiology

• hemodialysis
• hepatitis C virus
• nosocomial transmission
• prevalence
• viral hepatitis

• Attitude of Health Personnel
• Humans
• Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications
• Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery
• Kidney Transplantation/statistics & numerical data
• Liver Cirrhosis/complications
• Liver Cirrhosis/surgery
• Liver Transplantation
• Renal Dialysis
• Surgeons
• Surveys and Questionnaires
• United States

Background: Hepatitis B viral infection (HBV) has been regarded as a contraindication for kidney transplantation because of the high risk of viral activation induced by immunosuppressive therapy. Anti-retroviral drugs have changed the prognosis of patients with hepatitis B viral infection (HBV+) who are candidates for renal transplant; indeed, therapy with antiretroviral drugs may ensure lower rates of morbidity and mortality compared to traditional therapies. Entecavir is the first-line antiviral therapy recommended for the treatment of HBV+ kidney-transplanted patients. In case of resistance to entecavir, tenofovir may be an alternative drug, either alone or in combination with entecavir. However, the best strategy of treatment is still unknown. In this case-report, a HBV+ kidney-transplanted patient who presented resistance to entecavir was initially treated by associating tenofovir to entecavir and with tenofovir alone afterward. This strategy induced complete remission of viral replication. Case presentation: In a HBV+ kidney-transplanted patient under monotherapy with entecavir, HBV flare (HBV DNA > 170.000 × 10³ UI/mL, HBeAg+, HbeAb–) occurred 9 months after transplantation; at that time, blood chemistry highlighted: creatinine 1.46 mg/dL, blood urea 65 mg/dL, e-GFR 50 mL/min, proteinuria 300 mg/24 h, calciuria 2,12 mmol/24 h, phosphaturia 0.56 g/24 h, vitamin D 11.5 ng/mL, PTH 130 pg/mL, calcemia 2.3 mmol/L, and phosphoremia 2 mg/dL. Liver elastometry (FibroScan) showed moderate fibrosis. Tenofovir was associated to entecavir. Three months after the combination therapy, reduction in HBV DNA replication (351 × 10³ UI/mL) was obtained. Creatinine and e-GFR were 1.48 mg/dL and 52 mL/min, respectively. At this point, entecavir was discontinued. After 13 months of tenofovir monotherapy, complete remission of viral replication was achieved but renal function deteriorated and proteinuria increased. Conclusion: This case-report indicates that tenofovir is effective in reducing viral replication of hepatitis B virus in a kidney-transplanted patient who presented resistance to previous treatment with entecavir. However, it should be taken into account that tenofovir could affect renal function.

• chronic hepatitis B
• kidney transplant
• tenofovir

The immune system becomes less effective with age, and older age is associated with an increased susceptibility to diseases and reduced responses to vaccination. Furthermore, some adult populations, such as those with diabetes mellitus, are at increased risk of acute hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Decreasing responses to vaccination with advanced age have been described, but it is not known at what age immunogenicity starts to reduce, or until what age immunogenicity remains acceptable (for example ≥80 % seroprotection post-vaccination). We characterized the relationship between age and seroprotection rate induced by recombinant HBV vaccination by conducting a pooled analysis of clinical trial data. Healthy adults aged ≥20 y who had been vaccinated with 20μg HBV vaccine (Engerix™ B, GSK Vaccines, Belgium) in a 0, 1, 6 months schedule in 11 studies since 1996 were included. The observed seroprotection rate, defined as an anti-HBV surface antigen antibody concentration ≥10 mIU/ml was 94.5% in the whole population (N = 2,620, Total vaccinated cohort), ranging from 98.6% in adults vaccinated at age 20–24 years, to 64.8% in those vaccinated at age ≥65 y A model on seroprotection rates showed a statistically significant decrease with age, and predicted that the anti-HBs seroprotection rate remains ≥90% up to 49 y of age and ≥80% up to 60 y of age. Individuals at risk of HBV infection should be vaccinated as early in life as possible to improve the likelihood of achieving seroprotection. Additional studies are needed to identify whether unvaccinated individuals older than 60 y would benefit from regimens that include additional or higher vaccine doses.

• CI, confidence intervals
• anti-HBs, antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen
• hepatitis B
• immune senescence
• immunogenicity
• seroprotection
• vaccine

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is commonest blood borne infection amongst hemodialysis patients. Still, there is paucity of data on liver biopsy in these patients. Our center is doing regular liver biopsy in these patients and thus thought of sharing our experience. In this retrospective study, all patients with HCV infection on hemodialysis were subjected to liver biopsy. Serum bilirubin, liver enzyme, HCV-PCR, genotype and viral load measurement were done in all. Biopsy specimen was stained with H and E, Periodic Acid Schiff, Gomori Stain, Masson Trichrome and Perls Stain. International Working Group scoring system of Ishak et al. was used for Grading and Staging. Of the 270 liver biopsies, mean age of patients was 34.05 ± 10.28 years and 233 (85.3%) were males. Mean duration of hemodialysis was 10.9 ± 7.4 months while of known HCV infection was 5.2 ± 4.0 months. Genotype 3 was commonest followed by 1. All had normal bilirubin and 64 (23.1%) had normal ALT. In 37 (13.3%) patients anti-HCV was not detectable. Mean histology grade was 4.03 ± 1.65 (1-10) and stage was 0.75 ± 0.98 (0-3). Only one patient had cirrhosis on histology. Associated hemosiderosis was seen 10 patients. Only minor complications were observed with no mortality. In conclusion, our study shows that in one-fourth patients with active liver disease, liver enzymes are persistently normal in patients on hemodialysis. Further, carefully performed liver biopsy is reasonably safe procedure though some patients do have non-fatal complications. Liver biopsy helps in assessing disease activity, which otherwise cannot be assessed. Histological grade and stage in these patients is usually mild and cirrhosis is rare. Till such time other non-invasive test is validated, liver biopsy will remain an important test in these patients.

• Hemodialysis
• hepatitis C virus
• liver biopsy

• Entecavir
• Hepatitis B
• Long term outcome
• Renal transplantation
• Tenofovir

• Adjuvant
• Chronic kidney disease
• Hemodialysis
• Immune response
• Vaccine