Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is associated with sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors in BRCA-associated cancers, including ovarian, breast, prostate, and pancreatic cancers. This study explores HRD and homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations in a pan-cancer cohort to guide precision oncology.

Clinical and genomic data from 9,262 patients with 17 solid tumor types were analyzed using the OncoScreenTM Plus kit. HRD scores, biallelic HRR and tumor suppressor gene alterations, and their clinical correlations were evaluated.

HRD scores varied across cancer types, all showing a long tail in distribution. The prevalence of pathogenic alterations in pan-cancer HRR was 21.3%, with 13.7% of the cases having an HRD score ≥42. HRD-related events (LOH, LST, and TAI) exhibited similarities and cancer-specific patterns at the chromosomal arm level. Biallelic loss of HRR genes, especially BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51D, RAD51 C, and PPP2R2 A was linked to higher HRD scores in BRCA-associated cancers, while BARD1, RAD51D, RAD54L, BRCA1, and MRE11 were associated with elevated HRD scores in in other cancer types (non-BRCA cancers). TP53 biallelic alterations, with or without HRR alterations, were linked to increased HRD scores. Higher HRD scores were associated with late-stage, older, metastatic, PD-L1 positive, non-MSI-H/non-POLE samples were correlated with genomic instability indexes, such as structural chromosomal instability (SCIN), weighted genome instability index (WGII), and whole-genome doubling (WGD).

This is the largest pan-cancer HRD study in an Asian population, providing insights for future HRD testing and targeted therapy.

Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive and lethal disease, characterized by a limited response to chemotherapy and overall poor prognosis. Pancreatic cancers with a distinct mismatch repair deficiency, although relatively rare, have been shown to be associated with markedly better outcomes in comparison. Furthermore, whereas pancreatic cancers are generally unresponsive to current immunotherapy, this specific group of tumors has been shown to have a notable susceptibility to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

In this review, we aim to summarize the relevant literature regarding mismatch-repair associated pancreatic cancers, the impacted biological mechanisms, and the resulting vulnerabilities for potential opportunistic immunotherapeutic treatment approaches. We will also review the current clinical studies assessing survival outcomes of mismatch repair deficient pancreatic cancers and ongoing clinical trials in this emerging field.

Patients with dMMR/MSI-H pancreatic cancers harbor a distinct phenotype that has increased immune activation, greater responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and better overall survival when compared to other pancreatic cancers. Although this molecular subtype makes up a small minority of cases, emerging data suggest immunotherapy may offer benefit to these patients.

Immunotherapy emerges as a promising approach, marked by recent substantial progress in elucidating how the host immune response impacts tumor development and its sensitivity to various treatments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer therapy by unleashing the power of the immune system to recognize and eradicate tumor cells. Among these, inhibitors targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) have garnered significant attention due to their remarkable clinical efficacy across various malignancies. This review delves into the mechanisms of action, clinical applications, and emerging therapeutic strategies surrounding PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. We explore the intricate interactions between PD-1/PD-L1 and other immune checkpoints, shedding light on combinatorial approaches to enhance treatment outcomes and overcome resistance mechanisms. Furthermore, we discuss the expanding landscape of immune checkpoint inhibitors beyond PD-1/PD-L1, including novel targets such as CTLA-4, LAG-3, TIM-3, and TIGIT. Through a comprehensive analysis of preclinical and clinical studies, we highlight the promise and challenges of immune checkpoint blockade in cancer immunotherapy, paving the way for future advancements in the field.

CXCR5 is a chemokine receptor that promotes B cell follicular formation and antibody production. Indeed, CXCR5 has been found to be expressed in a variety of cancers; however, the role of CXCR5 expression in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remains unclear. We aimed to determine the impact of cellular CXCR5 expression on cancer outcomes, the PD-1/PD-L1 axis, and genetic states in patients with ccRCC. First, multiplex immunofluorescence staining for CXCR5, CD4, CD8, and AE1/AE3, along with automated single-cell counting, was performed to assess cellular CXCR5 expression in ccRCC and its association with prognosis. Second, the tumour microenvironment (TME) was analysed, with a focus on the relationship between the PD-1/PD-L1 axis and CXCR5 expression. Finally, an integrated analysis of CXCR5 expression and genomic mutation information was conducted to reveal the genetic background underlying CXCR5 expression. A total of 105 ccRCC patients were included. Among the 696,964 cells analysed, the distribution of CXCR5-expressing cells was as follows: 30% CXCR5+CD4+ cells, 9% CXCR5+CD8+ cells, and 26% CXCR5+AE1/AE3+ cells. Survival analysis revealed that tumours with low-CXCR5+CD8+ cells had a poor prognosis; TME analysis revealed a relationship between low-CXCR5+CD8+ status and a highly suppressive PD-L1-positive immune environment. Genomic analysis revealed a correlation between low-CXCR5+CD8+ status and high rates of alterations in chromatin remodelling genes, including PBRM1. This study highlights the significance of CXCR5+CD8+ cells in ccRCC, demonstrating their clinical implications and revealing the immunogenomic landscape underlying CXCR5 expression.

The prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with standard platinum-based chemotherapy was suboptimal, with safety concerns. Following encouraging results from a preliminary phase I study, this phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of first-line sintilimab and anlotinib in metastatic NSCLC.

In this open-label, randomized controlled trial (NCT04124731), metastatic NSCLC without epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), or proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase ROS (ROS1) mutations, and previous treatments for metastatic disease were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either sintilimab (200 mg every 3 weeks) plus anlotinib (12 mg D1-14 every 3 weeks) or a standard platinum-based chemotherapy regimen. Patients in the chemotherapy group were permitted to switch to sintilimab after disease progression. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR).

From November 2019 to March 2023, 99 patients were randomized into the sintilimab plus anlotinib group (n = 49) and the chemotherapy group (n = 50). The ORR was significantly higher in the sintilimab plus anlotinib group (44.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 30.7%-59.8%) compared to the chemotherapy group (18.0%; 95% CI = 8.6%-31.4%, P = 0.003). Progression-free survival (PFS) was also notably longer (median: 14.4 vs. 5.6 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.23-0.67; P < 0.001). The 24-month overall survival rate was 58.4% (95% CI = 40.4%-72.6%) and 43.2% (95% CI = 26.0%-59.2%), respectively. The rate of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was lower in the sintilimab plus anlotinib group (28.0%) than in the chemotherapy group (49.0%), especially for the hematological toxicities.

First-line sintilimab plus anlotinib showed improved ORR and PFS, alongside a superior safety profile, compared to the standard platinum-based chemotherapy for metastatic NSCLC patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that against programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1 have been approved as a promising treatment of many human cancers. However, the responses to these ICIs were limited in patients with ovarian cancer. Studies have indicated that the response to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade might be correlated with the PD-L1 expression level in cancer cells. Nucleophosmin (NPM/B23) was found to be a potential target for immunotherapy. Whether NPM/B23 plays a role in cancer-associated immunity, such as PD-1/PD-L1 axis, and its underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown in ovarian cancer.

We applied ovarian cancer cell lines as research models. The effect of modulating PD-L1 by NPM/B23 was subsequently confirmed via Western blot, flow cytometry, qRT-PCR, luciferase reporter assays, and immunoprecipitation. Protein stability and ubiquitin assay assays were used to analyze the interplay between NPM/B23 and NF-ĸB/p65 in PD-L1 regulation. The MOSEC/Luc xenograft mouse model was used to validate the role of NPM/B23-PD-L1 through tumor growth in vivo.

Our results revealed that NPM/B23 negatively regulates PD-L1 expression via a protein complex with NF-κB/p65 and through an IFN-γ pathway. Moreover, NPM/B23 inhibitor/modulator sensitized ovarian cancer cells to the anti-PD-1 antibody by regulating PD-L1 expression in the immunocompetent mouse model. Compared to anti-PD-1 antibody alone, a combination of anti-PD-1 antibody and NPM/B23 inhibitor/modulator showed reduced tumorigenesis and increased CD8+ T-cell expansion, thus contributing to prolonged survival on MOSEC/Luc-bearing mouse model.

Targeting NPM/B23 is a novel and potential therapeutic approach to sensitize ovarian cancer cells to immunotherapy.

There is a critical need to non-invasively assess the PD-L1 expression in tumors as a predictive biomarker for determining the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapies. Non-invasive imaging modality like positron emission tomography (PET) can be a powerful tool to assess the PD-L1 expression in the whole body including multiple metastases as a patient selection criterion for the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. In this study, we synthesized B11-nanobody, B11-scFv and B11-diabody fragments from the full-length anti-PD-L1 B11 IgG. Out of the three antibody fragments, B11-diabody showed higher nM affinity towards PD-L1 antigen as compared to B11-scFv and B11-nanobody. All three antibody fragments were successfully radiolabeled with 64Cu, a PET radioisotope. For radiolabeling, the antibody fragments were first conjugated with p-SCN-Bn-NOTA followed by chelation with 64Cu. All three radiolabeled antibody fragments were found to be stable in mouse and human sera for up to 24 h. Additionally, all three [64Cu]Cu-NOTA-B11-antibody fragments were evaluated in PD-L1 negative and human PD-L1 expressing cancer cells and subcutaneous tumor models. Based on the results, [64Cu]Cu-NOTA-B11-diabody has potential to be used as a PET imaging probe for assessing PD-L1 expression in tumors as early as 4 h post-injection, allowing faster assessment compared to the full length IgG based PET imaging probe.

The lack of an efficient way to screen patients who are responsive to immunotherapy challenges PD1/CTLA4-targeting cancer treatment. Immunotherapeutic efficacy cannot be clearly determined by peripheral blood analyses, tissue gene markers or CT/MR value. Here, we used a radionuclide and imaging techniques to investigate the novel dual targeted antibody cadonilimab (AK104) in PD1/CTLA4-positive cells in vivo.

First, humanized PD1/CTLA4 mice were purchased from Biocytogen Pharmaceuticals (Beijing) Co., Ltd. to express hPD1/CTLA4 in T-cells. Then, mouse colon cancer MC38-hPD-L1 cell xenografts were established in humanized mice. A bispecific antibody targeting PD1/CTLA4 (AK104) was labeled with radio-nuclide iodine isotopes. Immuno-PET/CT imaging was performed using a bispecific monoclonal antibody (mAb) probe 124I-AK104, developed in-house, to locate PD1+/CTLA4+ tumor-infiltrating T cells and monitor their distribution in mice to evaluate the therapeutic effect.

The 124I-AK104 dual-antibody was successfully constructed with ideal radiochemical characteristics, in vitro stability and specificity. The results of immuno-PET showed that 124I-AK104 revealed strong hPD1/CTLA4-positive responses with high specificity in humanized mice. High uptake of 124I-AK104 was observed not only at the tumor site but also in the spleen. Compared with PD1- or CTLA4-targeting mAb imaging, 124I-AK104 imaging had excellent standard uptake values at the tumor site and higher tumor to nontumor (T/NT) ratios.

The results demonstrated the potential of translating 124I-AK104 into a method for screening patients who benefit from immunotherapy and the efficacy, as well as the feasibility, of this method was verified by immuno-PET imaging of humanized mice.

Immune evasion contributes to cancer growth and progression. Cancer cells have the ability to activate different immune checkpoint pathways that harbor immunosuppressive functions. The programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligands (PD-Ls) are considered to be the major immune checkpoint molecules. The interaction of PD-1 and PD-L1 negatively regulates adaptive immune response mainly by inhibiting the activity of effector T cells while enhancing the function of immunosuppressive regulatory T cells (Tregs), largely contributing to the maintenance of immune homeostasis that prevents dysregulated immunity and harmful immune responses. However, cancer cells exploit the PD-1/PD-L1 axis to cause immune escape in cancer development and progression. Blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 by neutralizing antibodies restores T cells activity and enhances anti-tumor immunity, achieving remarkable success in cancer therapy. Therefore, the regulatory mechanisms of PD-1/PD-L1 in cancers have attracted an increasing attention. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the roles of the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling in human autoimmune diseases and cancers. We summarize all aspects of regulatory mechanisms underlying the expression and activity of PD-1 and PD-L1 in cancers, including genetic, epigenetic, post-transcriptional and post-translational regulatory mechanisms. In addition, we further summarize the progress in clinical research on the antitumor effects of targeting PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies alone and in combination with other therapeutic approaches, providing new strategies for finding new tumor markers and developing combined therapeutic approaches.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a frequent urological malignancy characterized by a high rate of metastasis and lethality. The treatment strategy for advanced RCC has moved through multiple iterations over the past three decades. Initially, cytokine treatment was the only systemic treatment option for patients with RCC. With the development of medicine, antiangiogenic agents targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and mammalian target of rapamycin and immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged and received several achievements in the therapeutics of advanced RCC. However, ICIs have still not brought completely satisfactory results due to drug resistance and undesirable side effects. For the past years, the interests form researchers have been attracted by the combination of ICIs and targeted therapy for advanced RCC and the angiogenesis and immunogenic tumor microenvironmental variations in RCC. Therefore, we emphasize the potential principle and the clinical progress of ICIs combined with targeted treatment of advanced RCC, and summarize the future direction.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a complex disease with diverse etiologies and clinical outcomes. Despite considerable progress in development of CRC therapeutics, challenges remain regarding the diagnosis and management of advanced stage metastatic CRC (mCRC). In particular, the five-year survival rate is very low since mCRC is currently rarely curable. Over the past decade, cancer treatment has significantly improved with the introduction of cancer immunotherapies, specifically immune checkpoint inhibitors. Therapies aimed at blocking immune checkpoints such as PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 target inhibitory pathways of the immune system, and thereby enhance anti-tumor immunity. These therapies thus have shown promising results in many clinical trials alone or in combination. The efficacy and safety of immunotherapy, either alone or in combination with CRC, have been investigated in several clinical trials. Clinical trials, including KEYNOTE-164 and CheckMate 142, have led to Food and Drug Administration approval of the PD-1 inhibitors pembrolizumab and nivolumab, respectively, for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic microsatellite instability-high or deficient mismatch repair CRC. Unfortunately, these drugs benefit only a small percentage of patients, with the benefits of immunotherapy remaining elusive for the vast majority of CRC patients. To this end, primary and secondary resistance to immunotherapy remains a significant issue, and further research is necessary to optimize the use of immunotherapy in CRC and identify biomarkers to predict the response. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the clinical trials involving immune checkpoint inhibitors in CRC. The underlying rationale, challenges faced, and potential future steps to improve the prognosis and enhance the likelihood of successful trials in this field are discussed.

PD-L1 is one of the two programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) ligands and a part of an immune checkpoint system (PD-1/PD-L1) with widespread clinical application. The aim of this study was to investigate PD-L1 expression and its association with clinicopathological and prognostic significance in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC) patients. A total of 41 papillary (pRCC) and 20 chromophobe (chRCC) RCC tumors were examined for PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry in the cancer cells and tumor-infiltrating mononuclear cells (TIMCs). PD-L1 positivity was detected in 36.6% pRCC and 85.0% chRCC cancer cells, while PD-L1 positivity was observed in 73.2% pRCC and 50.0% chRCC TIMCs. PD-L1 positivity in both pRCC and chRCC tumor cells was not correlated with any of the examined clinicopathological features, while PD-L1 positivity in TIMCs was associated with the age of patients with pRCC. During follow-up, the death was documented among 6 patients with pRCC. Papillary RCC patients with PD-L1-positive tumor cells were significantly associated with an increased risk of death compared with patients with PD-L1-negative cancer cells. A similar trend was observed when comparing PD-L1 expression in TIMCs. However, no differences in overall survival for PD-L1-positive pRCC patients with compared to PD-L1-negative patients were observed in tumor cells or TIMCs.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is among the most lethal urologic malignancies once metastatic. Current treatment approaches for metastatic RCC (mRCC) involve immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that target the PD-L1/PD-1 axis. High PD-L1 expression in tumor tissue has been identified as a negative prognostic factor in RCC. However, the role of PD-L1 as a liquid biomarker has not yet been fully explored. Herein, we analyze urine levels of PD-L1 in mRCC patients before and after either ICI therapy or surgical intervention, as well as in a series of patients with treatment-naïve RCC.

The mid-stream urine of patients with mRCC (n = 4) or treatment-naïve RCC, i.e., prior to surgery from two centers (cohort I, n = 49: cohort II, n = 29) was analyzed for PD-L1 by ELISA. The results from cohort I were compared to a control group consisting of patients treated for non-malignant urologic diseases (n = 31). In the mRCC group, urine PD-L1 levels were measured before and after tumor nephrectomy (n = 1) or before and after ICI therapy (n = 3). Exosomal PD-L1 in the urine was analyzed in selected patients by immunoblotting.

A strong decrease in urine PD-L1 levels was found after tumor nephrectomy or following systemic treatment with ICIs. In patients with treatment-naïve RCC (cohort I), urine PD-L1 levels were significantly elevated in the RCC group in comparison to the control group (median 59 pg/mL vs. 25.7 pg/mL, p = 0.011). PD-L1 urine levels were found to be elevated, in particular, in low-grade RCCs in cohorts I and II. Exosomal PD-L1 was detected in the urine of a subset of patients.

In this proof-of-concept study, we show that PD-L1 can be detected in the urine of RCC patients. Urine PD-L1 levels were found to correlate with the treatment response in mRCC patients and were significantly elevated in treatment-naïve RCC patients.

Tweetable abstract Immunotherapy options in RCC treatment are increasing day by day. In pursuit of this objective, we have explored the role of pathology throughout the process, from the development to the implementation of immunotherapy in this paper.

Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) accounts for about 4%-5% of all kidney cancers. Previous studies showed that PD-1 and PD-L1 expression was higher in sRCC compared to non-sRCC. In the present study, we aimed to investigate PD-1/PD-L1 expression and its association with clinicopathological features in sRCC.

The study included 59 patients diagnosed with sRCC between January 2012 and January 2022. The expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 in sRCC was detected by immunohistochemical staining, and its correlation with clinicopathological parameters was analyzed by χ2 test and Fisher exact test. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to describe the overall survival (OS). The prognostic significance of clinicopathological parameters on OS was assessed by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

Among the 59 cases, the positive expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 was 34 cases (57.6%) and 37 cases (62.7%), respectively. PD-1 expression was not significantly correlated with any parameters. However, PD-L1 expression was significantly correlated with tumor size and pathologic T stage. OS was shorter in the subgroup of patients with PD-L1-positive sRCC compared with the PD-L1-negative subgroup. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between PD-1-positive and negative subgroups. According to our study, the univariate and multivariate analysis indicated that pathological T3 and T4 was an independent risk factor in PD-1-positive sRCC.

We studied the relationship between PD-1/PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological characteristics in sRCC. The findings may provide valuable implications for clinical prediction.

Cervical cancer ranks as the fourth most common form of cancer worldwide. There is a large number of situations that may be examined in the developing world. The risk of contracting HPV (Human Papillomavirus) due to poor sanitation and sexual activity is mostly to blame for the disease's alarming rate of expansion. Immunotherapy is widely regarded as one of the most effective medicines available. The immunotherapy used to treat cervical cancer cells relies on inhibitors that block the immune checkpoint. The poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymer inhibited cervical cancer cells by activating both the programmed death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (CTLA-1) checkpoints, a strategy that has been shown to have impressive effects. Yet, immunotherapy directed towards tumors that have already been invaded by lymphocytes leaves a positive imprint on the healing process. Immunotherapy is used in conjunction with other treatments, including chemotherapy and radiation, to provide faster and more effective outcomes. In this combination therapy, several medications such as Pembrolizumab, Durvalumab, Atezolizumab, and so on are employed in clinical trials. Recent developments and future predictions suggest that vaccinations will soon be developed with the dual goal of reducing the patient's susceptibility to illness while simultaneously strengthening their immune system. Many clinical and preclinical studies are now investigating the effectiveness of immunotherapy in slowing the progression of cervical cancer. The field of immunotherapy is expected to witness more progress toward improving outcomes. Immunotherapies landscape and associated inhibitors for the treatment of Cervical Cancer.

Nephrectomy, whether in the era of cytokine therapy or targeted therapy, has an important role in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. With the advent of immunotherapy, immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy has become the mainstream of systemic therapy, but the role of nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma is unclear. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the impact of nephrectomy on survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received immune-targeted therapy.

Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received immune-targeted therapy at three centers between May 17, 2019 and August 1, 2022 were collected, who were divided into two groups based on whether nephrectomy was performed or not. Survival, response rate and adverse event were compared between the two groups. The primary end point was progression free survival, Subgroup analysis and univariate and multivariable prognostic analyses were also assessed.

With a median follow-up time of 29.3 months (95% CI 28.5-30.2), 165 patients were recruited and divided into two groups based on whether they underwent nephrectomy or not. There were 68 patients in the non-nephrectomy group, 97 in the nephrectomy group. Compared to patients treated with immune-targeted therapy, patients treated with immune-targeted therapy plus nephrectomy were able to achieve survival benefits, with a median PFS of 10.8 months (95% CI 8.3-13.3) and 14.4 months (95% CI 12.6-16.2), respectively, as well as an HR of 0.476 (95% CI 0.323-0.701, p = 0.0002). The 12-month and 18-month PFS rates were 30.9% versus 60.8% and 7.4% versus 25.8%, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) was 52.9% and 60.8%, respectively, in the non-nephrectomy and nephrectomy groups (p = 0.313), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 75% and 83.5%, respectively (p = 0.179). The most common adverse events related to treatment were hypothyroidism, immune-related pneumonitis and rash. Multivariate analysis showed that primary tumor nephrectomy prior to immune-targeted therapy, clear cell renal carcinoma and oligo metastasis were independent prognostic factors.

Nephrectomy may provide PFS benefit with tolerable safety for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who receive immune-targeted therapy. In multivariate analysis, nephrectomy, clear cell carcinoma, and oligo-organ metastasis were found to be favorable independent prognostic factors.

The study aimed to examine the significance of insulin receptor (INSR) expression in predicting resistance to axitinib in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

Clinicopathological data were collected from 36 consecutive patients with metastatic RCC who received axitinib. Thirty-three primary tumours were obtained for immunohistochemistry. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models were created by transplanting primary tumours into immunodeficient mice, establishing axitinib-resistant PDX models. RCC cell lines were co-cultured with human renal glomerular endothelial cells (HGECs) treated with siRNA of INSR (HGEC-siINSR). Gene expression alteration was analysed using microarray.

The patients with low INSR expression who received axitinib had a poorer outcome. Multivariate analysis showed that INSR expression was the independent predictor of progression-free survival. INSR expression decreased in axitinib-resistant PDX tumours. RCC cell lines showed upregulated interferon responses and highly increased interferon-β levels by co-culturing with HGEC-siINSR. HGECs showed decreased INSR and increased interferon-β after axitinib administration. RCC cell lines co-cultured with HGEC-siINSR showed high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, which increased after interferon-β administration.

Decreased INSR in RCC could be a biomarker to predict axitinib resistance. Regarding the resistant mechanism, vascular endothelial cells with decreased INSR in RCC may secrete interferon-β and induce PD-L1.

Renal cancer is a common malignancy of the urinary system, and renal clear cell carcinoma (RCCC) is the most common pathological type. Transmembrane channel-like (TMC) protein is an evolutionarily conserved gene family containing 8 members, however there is still a lack of comprehensive analysis about TMC family members in RCCC. In this study, we analyzed the expression of TMC family members in RCCC from TCGA and investigated the prognosis values and immune infiltration of TMC family members in RCCC. We found that TMC2, TMC3, TMC5, TMC7 and TMC8 were significantly related with overall survival (OS) of RCCC patients. TMC3, TMC6, and TMC8 was positively correlated with the degree of immune infiltration in RCCC. TMC2, TMC6, TMC7, and TMC8 were positively correlated with immune checkpoint genes, whereas TMC4 was negative. According to KEGG and GO analysis, almost all TMCs except TMC4 were involved in the immune response. Thus, we may regard the TMC family members as novel biomarkers to predict potential prognosis and immunotherapeutic response in RCCC patients.

Standard treatment for localized non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is radical or partial nephrectomy. However, after radical surgery, patients with stage II-III have a substantial risk of relapse (around 35%). To date a unique standardized classification for the risk of disease recurrence still lack. Moreover, in the last years great attention has been focused in developing systemic therapies with the aim of improving the disease-free survival (DFS) of high-risk patients, with negative results from adjuvant VEGFR-TKIs. Therefore, there is still a need for developing effective treatments for radically resected RCC patients who are at intermediate/high risk of relapse. Recently, interesting results came from immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway, with a significant benefit in terms of disease-free survival from adjuvant pembrolizumab. However, the conflicting results of diverse clinical trials investigating different ICI-based regimens in the adjuvant setting, together with the still immature data on the overall survival advantage of immunotherapy, requires careful considerations. Furthermore, several questions remain unanswered, primarily regarding the selection of patients who could benefit the most from immunotherapy. In this review, we have summarized the main clinical trials investigating adjuvant therapy in RCC, with a particular focus on immunotherapy. Moreover, we have analyzed the crucial issue of patients' stratification according to the risk of disease recurrence, and we have described the possible future prospective and novel agents under evaluation for perioperative and adjuvant therapies.

Cancer immunotherapy, mainly including immune checkpoints-targeted therapy and the adoptive transfer of engineered immune cells, has revolutionized the oncology landscape as it utilizes patients' own immune systems in combating the cancer cells. Cancer cells escape immune surveillance by hijacking the corresponding inhibitory pathways via overexpressing checkpoint genes. Phagocytosis checkpoints, such as CD47, CD24, MHC-I, PD-L1, STC-1 and GD2, have emerged as essential checkpoints for cancer immunotherapy by functioning as "don't eat me" signals or interacting with "eat me" signals to suppress immune responses. Phagocytosis checkpoints link innate immunity and adaptive immunity in cancer immunotherapy. Genetic ablation of these phagocytosis checkpoints, as well as blockade of their signaling pathways, robustly augments phagocytosis and reduces tumor size. Among all phagocytosis checkpoints, CD47 is the most thoroughly studied and has emerged as a rising star among targets for cancer treatment. CD47-targeting antibodies and inhibitors have been investigated in various preclinical and clinical trials. However, anemia and thrombocytopenia appear to be formidable challenges since CD47 is ubiquitously expressed on erythrocytes. Here, we review the reported phagocytosis checkpoints by discussing their mechanisms and functions in cancer immunotherapy, highlight clinical progress in targeting these checkpoints and discuss challenges and potential solutions to smooth the way for combination immunotherapeutic strategies that involve both innate and adaptive immune responses.

Currently, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most prevalent type of kidney cancer. Targeted therapy has replaced radiation therapy and chemotherapy as the main treatment option for RCC due to the lack of significant efficacy with these conventional therapeutic regimens. Sunitinib, a drug used to treat gastrointestinal tumors and renal cell carcinoma, inhibits the tyrosine kinase activity of a number of receptor tyrosine kinases, including vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), c-Kit, rearranged during transfection (RET) and fms-related receptor tyrosine kinase 3 (Flt3). Although sunitinib has been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of patients with advanced RCC, a significant number of patients have primary resistance to sunitinib or acquired drug resistance within the 6-15 months of therapy. Thus, in order to develop more efficacious and long-lasting treatment strategies for patients with advanced RCC, it will be crucial to ascertain how to overcome sunitinib resistance that is produced by various drug resistance mechanisms. In this review, we discuss: 1) molecular mechanisms of sunitinib resistance; 2) strategies to overcome sunitinib resistance and 3) potential predictive biomarkers of sunitinib resistance.

Since the introduction of the first anticancer treatments at the beginning of the 20th century, many different chemotherapeutics have been developed [...].

The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic impact of fat loss after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Data from 60 patients treated with ICI therapy for metastatic ccRCC were retrospectively analyzed. Changes in cross-sectional areas of subcutaneous fat (SF) between the pre-treatment and post-treatment abdominal computed tomography (CT) images were expressed as percentages and were divided by the interval between the CT scans to calculate ΔSF (%/month). SF loss was defined as ΔSF < -5%/month. Survival analyses for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were performed. Patients with SF loss had shorter OS (median, 9.5 months vs. not reached; p < 0.001) and PFS (median, 2.6 months vs. 33.5 months; p < 0.001) than patients without SF loss. ΔSF was independently associated with OS (adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07-2.07; p = 0.020) and PFS (adjusted HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.17-2.12; p = 0.003), with a 5%/month decrease in SF increasing the risk of death and progression by 49% and 57%, respectively. In conclusion, Loss of SF after treatment initiation is a significant and independent poor prognostic factor for OS and PFS in patients with metastatic ccRCC who receive ICI therapy.

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) as first-line therapy for patients diagnosed as having advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We enrolled 51 patients to receive ICI+TKI therapy for mRCC at 9 Japanese institutions. The overall survival (OS) of the patients treated with ICI+TKI was the primary endpoint., and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Furthermore, we analyzed the clinical prognostic and predictive factors in patients with mRCC treated with ICI+TKI therapy. Seven months was the median follow-up period. The OS rates at 6, 12, and 18 months were 93.1, 82.5, and 68.8%, respectively. The median PFS for patients who received ICI+TKI was 19.0 months, ORR was 68.6%, and DCR was 88.2%. ICI+TKI-related adverse events occurred in 43 patients (84.3%) with any grade and in 22 patients (43.1%) with grade ≥3. Treatment selection with poor prognostic factors may be prudent, even though ICI+TKI is an efficacious and safe first-line treatment in patients with mRCC.

Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a rare and aggressive neoplasm, usually associated with a poor prognosis (5 years survival rate <10%). For unresectable disease, platinum and pemetrexed chemotherapy has been the only standard of care in first line for more than two decades, while no standard treatments have been approved in subsequent lines. Recently, immunotherapy has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of MM. In fact, the combination of ipilimumab plus nivolumab has been approved in first line setting. Moreover, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) showed promising results also in second-third line setting after platinum-based chemotherapy. Unfortunately, approximately 20% of patients are primary refractory to ICIs and there is an urgent need for reliable biomarkers to improve patient's selection. Several biological and molecular features have been studied for this goal. In particular, histological subtype (recognized as prognostic factor for MM and predictive factor for chemotherapy response), programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and tumor mutational burden (widely hypothesized as predictive biomarkers for ICIs in several solid tumors) have been evaluated, but with unconclusive results. On the other hand, the deep analysis of tumor infiltrating microenvironment and the improvement in genomic profiling techniques has led to a better knowledge of several mechanisms underlying the MM biology and a greater or poorer immune activation. Consequentially, several potential biomarkers predictive of response to immunotherapy in patients with MM have been identified, also if all these elements need to be further investigated and prospectively validated. In this paper, the main evidences about clinical efficacy of ICIs in MM and the literature data about the most promising predictive biomarkers to immunotherapy are reviewed.

Though meningiomas are generally regarded as benign tumors, there is increasing awareness of a large group of meningiomas that are biologically aggressive and refractory to the current standards of care treatment modalities. Coinciding with this has been increasing recognition of the important that the immune system plays in mediating tumor growth and response to therapy. To address this point, immunotherapy has been leveraged for several other cancers such as lung, melanoma, and recently glioblastoma in the context of clinical trials. However, first deciphering the immune composition of meningiomas is essential in order to determine the feasibility of similar therapies for these tumors. Here in this chapter, we review recent updates on characterizing the immune microenvironment of meningiomas and identify potential immunological targets that hold promise for future immunotherapy trials.

New strategies that enhance both the targetability of chemotherapy drugs and the synergistic effects of chemotherapy and immunotherapy are urgently needed for efficacious solid tumor therapy. In this study, a novel biomimetic nanoparticle system possessing the properties of tumor targeting and immune synergy was designed to meet these requirements. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles loaded with the chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin (DOX) were coated with cell membranes modified by glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored anti-HER2 single chain variable fragment (scFv) and the GPI-anchored co-stimulatory molecule CD80 (to promote solid tumor-targeted chemotherapy and cooperated immunotherapy, respectively). The impact of the nanotherapeutic system on both tumor-targeted chemotherapy and cellular immune response was investigated through in vitro and in vivo experiments. The results show that the novel biomimetic therapeutic system effectively promoted antitumor efficiency in vitro and in vivo. In addition, this therapeutic system further enhanced antitumor capacity by increasing CD8⁺ T cell activation and cytokine production and reducing myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) levels in tumors.

Spontaneous tumors are a major cause of death in cats. Treatment of human tumors has progressed dramatically in the past decade, partly due to the success of immunotherapies using immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) and anti-PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies. However, little is known about the PD-1 pathway and its association with tumor disease in cats. This study investigated the applicability of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in feline tumors. We first determined the complete coding sequence of feline PD-L1 and PD-L2, and found that the deduced amino acid sequences of feline PD-L1/PD-L2 share high sequence identities (66-83%) with orthologs in other mammalian species. We prepared recombinant feline PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 proteins and confirmed receptor-ligand binding between PD-1 and PD-L1/PD-L2 using flow cytometry. Next, we established an anti-feline PD-L1 monoclonal antibody (clone CL1Mab-7) to analyze the expression of PD-L1. Flow cytometry using CL1Mab-7 revealed the cell surface expression of PD-L1 in a feline macrophage (Fcwf-4) and five mammary adenocarcinoma cell lines (FKNp, FMCm, FYMp, FONp, and FONm), and showed that PD-L1 expression was upregulated by interferon-γ stimulation. Finally, immunohistochemistry using CL1Mab-7 also showed PD-L1 expression in feline squamous cell carcinoma (5/5, 100%), mammary adenocarcinoma (4/5, 80%), fibrosarcoma (5/5, 100%), and renal cell carcinoma (2/2, 100%) tissues. Our results strongly encourage further investigations of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway as a potential therapeutic target for feline tumors.

Atezolizumab with chemotherapy has shown improved progression-free and overall survival in patients with metastatic PD-L1 positive triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Atezolizumab with anthracycline- and taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy has also shown increased pathological complete response (pCR) rates in early TNBC. This trial evaluated neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without atezolizumab in patients with clinical stages II-III TNBC. The co-primary objectives were to evaluate if chemotherapy and atezolizumab increase pCR rate and tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) percentage compared to chemotherapy alone in the mITT population. Sixty-seven patients (ages 25-78 years; median, 52 years) were randomly assigned - 22 patients to Arm A, and 45 to Arm B. Median follow up was 6.6 months. In the modified intent to treat population (all patients evaluable for the primary endpoints who received at least one dose of combination therapy), the pCR rate was 18.8% (95% CI 4.0-45.6%) in Arm A, and 55.6% (95% CI 40.0-70.4%) in Arm B (estimated treatment difference: 36.8%, 95% CI 8.5-56.6%; p = 0.018). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 62.5% of patients in Arm A, and 57.8% of patients in Arm B. One patient in Arm B died from recurrent disease during the follow-up period. TIL percentage increased slightly from baseline to cycle 1 in both Arm A (mean ± SD: 0.6% ± 21.0%) and Arm B (5.7% ± 15.8%) (p = 0.36). Patients with pCR had higher median TIL percentages (24.8%) than those with non-pCR (14.2%) (p = 0.02). Although subgroup analyses were limited by the small sample size, PD-L1-positive patients treated with chemotherapy and atezolizumab had a pCR rate of 75% (12/16). The addition of atezolizumab to neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel resulted in a statistically significant and clinically relevant increased pCR rate in patients with clinical stages II and III TNBC. (Funded by National Cancer Institute).

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by a high rate of systemic metastasis, insensitivity to conventional treatment and susceptibility to drug resistance, resulting in a poor patient prognosis. The immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represented by antibodies of programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) and programmed death receptor ligand 1 (PD-L1) have provided new therapeutic options for TNBC. However, the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade monotherapy is suboptimal immune response, which may be caused by reduced antigen presentation, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, interplay with other immune checkpoints and aberrant activation of oncological signaling in tumor cells. Therefore, to improve the sensitivity of TNBC to ICIs, suitable patients are selected based on reliable predictive markers and treated with a combination of ICIs with other therapies such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, oncologic virus and neoantigen-based therapies. This review discusses the current mechanisms underlying the resistance of TNBC to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, the potential biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy and recent advances in the combination therapies to increase response rates, the depth of remission and the durability of the benefit of TNBC to ICIs.

A multicenter retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib in patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We enrolled 53 patients with mRCC who received cabozantinib at eight institutions in Japan. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS). In addition, we analyzed prognostic factors in patients with mRCC treated with cabozantinib. The median follow-up period was 8 months, and the median OS was 20.0 months. The ORR and DCR were 39.6% and 83.0%, respectively. The median PFS was 11.0 months. PFS was significantly shorter in patients previously treated with at least two tyrosine kinase inhibitors and in those with C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 1.27 mg/dL (p = 0.021 and p = 0.029, respectively). Adverse events of any grade and grades ≥3 occurred in 42 (79.2%) and 10 (18.9%) patients, respectively. Cabozantinib is a useful treatment option for patients with mRCC and may benefit from earlier use. In this study, CRP ≥ 1.27 mg/dL is a poor prognostic factor in patients treated with cabozantinib, and careful follow-up may be required in treating patients with high CRP.

Liquid biopsies in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) provide a unique approach to understand the molecular basis of treatment response and resistance. This is particularly important in the context of immunotherapies, which target key immune-tumor interactions. Unlike metastatic tissue biopsies, serial real-time profiling of mRCC is feasible with our noninvasive circulating tumor cell (CTC) approach.

We collected 457 longitudinal liquid biopsies from 104 patients with mRCC enrolled in one of two studies, either a prospective cohort or a phase II multicenter adaptive immunotherapy trial. Using a novel CTC capture and automated microscopy platform, we profiled CTC enumeration and expression of HLA I and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). Given their diametric immunological roles, we focused on the HLA I to PD-L1 ratio (HP ratio).

Patients with radiographic responses showed significantly lower CTC abundances throughout treatment. Furthermore, patients whose CTC enumeration trajectory was in the highest quartile (> 0.12 CTCs/mL annually) had shorter overall survival (median 17.0 months v 21.1 months, P < .001). Throughout treatment, the HP ratio decreased in patients receiving immunotherapy but not in patients receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Patients with an HP ratio trajectory in the highest quartile (≥ 0.0012 annually) displayed significantly shorter overall survival (median 18.4 months v 21.2 months, P = .003).

In the first large longitudinal CTC study in mRCC to date to our knowledge, we identified the prognostic importance of CTC enumeration and the change over time of both CTC enumeration and the HP ratio. These insights into changes in both tumor burden and the molecular profile of tumor cells in response to different treatments provide potential biomarkers to predict and monitor response to immunotherapy in mRCC.

Despite non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment is proved to be effective using PD-L1 monoclonal antibody (PD-L1 MAb), it is commonly seen in immune-related adverse events reported. We aimed to explore metformin synergized with PD-L1 MAb in treating NSCLC and its potential molecular mechanism. In mice, the transplantable lung cancer models were established and a co-culture system of CD8+T cells and LLC cells was constructed. The anti-tumor effect was assessed by xenograft tumor growth, proliferation signal Ki67 expression, and MTT assays. Immunohistochemistry and western blot assays were also conducted to determine tumor immune response as well as mechanism investigation. The results indicated that tumor volume and cell proliferation were markedly inhibited following metformin synergized with PD-L1 MAb which was more effective than either single metformin or PD-L1 MAb. The cytokines TNF-α, IL-2, and IFN-γ secretion in CD8+ T cells was significantly increased, and the immune response was enhanced by metformin synergized with PD-L1 MAb. Further, the WB results implied that metformin synergized with PD-L1 MAb could activate the AMPK pathway and inhibit mTOR. AMPK inhibitor (Compound C) was added, and the results showed that the anti-tumor effect was reduced in metformin + PD-L1 MAb + CC than in metformin + PD-L1 MAb which indicates the metformin synergized with PD-L1 MAb efficacy was AMPK pathway dependent. In conclusion, metformin synergized with PD-L1 MAb has better efficacy against NSCLC than metformin or PD-L1 MAb alone in an AMPK-dependent way and facilitates increasing CD8+ T cell infiltration and enhancing tumor immune response.