Enteral nutrition is a critical component of therapy for many hospitalized children. Some children, especially those with critical illness, require post-pyloric enteral nutrition, but placement of post-pyloric feeding tubes poses challenges, necessitating costly fluoroscopy procedures and delaying initiation of enteral nutrition. There is no established standard method for pediatric transpyloric tube placement at the bedside.

We searched for trials that assessed the efficacy of methods for transpyloric tube placement at the bedside. Studies that evaluated gastric insufflation, prokinetic agents, pH guided devices, and electromagnetic devices with an objective of bedside transpyloric tube placement in children ages one month to 18 years were included.

After each author independently reviewed the search results, we agreed on fourteen articles for inclusion, consisting of six randomized controlled trials, five quasi-experimental studies, and three cohort studies. Intervention protocols varied, both within and between studies, with most trials incorporating more than one variable in the intervention.

The heterogeneity of the research does not provide clear direction about best practices. All interventions demonstrated some efficacy, with the exception of erythromycin. Gastric insufflation, the most prevalent intervention studied, is safe and at least moderately effective. The research demonstrates the positive impact of a small, trained team of personnel for the insertion of a transpyloric tube.

High quality studies with clear protocols evaluating a single variable are needed in order to establish a bedside transpyloric tube placement protocol. We recommend studies on the efficacy of a dedicated team for this procedure.

Despite the use of prokinetic agents, the overall success rate for postpyloric placement via a self-propelled spiral nasoenteric tube is quite low.

This retrospective study was conducted in the intensive care units of 11 university hospitals from 2006 to 2016 among adult patients who underwent self-propelled spiral nasoenteric tube insertion. Success was defined as postpyloric nasoenteric tube placement confirmed by abdominal x-ray scan 24 hours after tube insertion. Chi-square automatic interaction detection (CHAID), simple classification and regression trees (SimpleCart), and J48 methodologies were used to develop decision tree models, and multiple logistic regression (LR) methodology was used to develop an LR model for predicting successful postpyloric nasoenteric tube placement. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of these models.

Successful postpyloric nasoenteric tube placement was confirmed in 427 of 939 patients enrolled. For predicting successful postpyloric nasoenteric tube placement, the performance of the 3 decision trees was similar in terms of the AUCs: 0.715 for the CHAID model, 0.682 for the SimpleCart model, and 0.671 for the J48 model. The AUC of the LR model was 0.729, which outperformed the J48 model.

Both the CHAID and LR models achieved an acceptable discrimination for predicting successful postpyloric nasoenteric tube placement and were useful for intensivists in the setting of self-propelled spiral nasoenteric tube insertion.

The purpose of the article is to evaluate the effects of mechanical complications, such as clogging or coiling, of gastrojejunostomy tubes on radiation exposure during exchange in the pediatric population. In this HIPAA-compliant and IRB-approved study, we retrospectively reviewed procedural records for patients undergoing gastrojejunostomy (GJ) tube exchange during a 4-month period in 2014. Success of the procedure, specifications of the tube, age, and sex of the patient as well as radiation exposure during the procedure were included. Radiation exposure was measured in fluoroscopy time and cumulative air kerma. Complications encountered during exchange were also recorded, if available. Patients presenting for gastrostomy to GJ conversions or combined procedures were excluded from the study. Ordinary and mixed effect linear regression models were used to test associations between GJ tube parameters, presence of mechanical complications, and fluoroscopy time and radiation dose. 146 patients undergoing 285 GJ exchanges met inclusion criteria over the 4-month study period (M:F 82:64). All exchanges were successful with 85 demonstrating a form of mechanical complication (44 coiled, 41 clogged). Of the reported GJ tube specifications, only tube length was significantly associated with mechanical complications (p < 0.001). The presence of mechanical complication was significantly associated with increased radiation exposure and fluoroscopy time (p < 0.0001). Mechanical complications of gastrojejunostomy tubes, such as clogging or coiling, are associated with increased radiation exposure during exchange. Strategies to decrease these complications, including re-siting the gastrostomy tract or placement of a surgical jejunostomy in the event of repeated coiling of a tube should be strongly considered.

The procedures needed to insert nasojejunal tubes (NJTs) are often invasive or uncomfortable for the patient and require hospital resources. The objectives of this study were to describe our experience in inserting a self-propelling NJT with distal pigtail end and evaluate clinical validity and cost efficacy of this enteral nutrition (EN) approach compared with parenteral nutrition (PN).

Prospective study from July 2009 to December 2010, including hospitalized noncritical patients who required short-term jejunal EN. The tubes were inserted at bedside, using intravenous erythromycin as a prokinetic drug. Positioning was considered correct when the distal end was beyond the ligament of Treitz. Migration failure was considered when the tube was not positioned into the jejunum within 48 hours postinsertion.

Fifty-six insertions were recorded in 47 patients, most frequently in severe acute pancreatitis (69.6%). The migration rates at 18 and 48 hours postinsertion were 73.2% and 82.1%, respectively. There was migration failure in 8.9% of cases, and 8.9% were classified null (the tube was no longer in the gastrointestinal tract at 18 hours). There were no reported or observed complications. The mean duration of the EN was 12 ± 10.8 days. Five different types of EN formula were used. The total study cost was 53.9% lower compared with using PN in all patients.

Our study demonstrated that bedside insertion of a self-propelling NJT is a safe, cost-effective, and successful technique for postpyloric enteral feeding in at least 73% of the patients, and only 18% of patients could eventually need other placement techniques. It can avoid the need for more aggressive or expensive placement techniques or even PN if we cannot achieve enteral access.

The use of prokinetic agents on post-pyloric placement of spiral nasojejunal tubes is controversial. The aim of the present study was to examine if metoclopramide or domperidone can increase the success rate of post-pyloric placement of spiral nasojejunal tubes.

A multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in seven hospitals in China between April 2012 and February 2014. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit and requiring enteral nutrition for more than three days were randomly assigned to the metoclopramide, domperidone or control groups (1:1:1 ratio). The primary outcome was defined as the success rate of post-pyloric placement of spiral nasojejunal tubes, assessed 24 hours after initial placement. Secondary outcomes included success rate of post-D1, post-D2, post-D3 and proximal jejunum placement and tube migration distance. Safety of the study drugs and the tubes during the entire study period were recorded.

In total, 307 patients were allocated to the metoclopramide (n = 103), domperidone (n = 100) or control group (n = 104). The success rate of post-pyloric placement after 24 hours in the metoclopramide, domperidone and control groups was 55.0%, 51.5% and 27.3%, respectively (P = 0.0001). Logistic regression analysis identified the use of prokinetic agents, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score <20, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score <12 and without vasopressor as independent factors influencing the success rate of post-pyloric placement. No serious drug-related adverse reaction was observed.

Prokinetic agents, such as metoclopramide or domperidone, are effective at improving the success rate of post-pyloric placement of spiral nasojejunal tubes in critically ill patients.

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-TRC-12001956 . Registered 21 February 2012.

Patients with Crohn's disease are often investigated using MRI enteroclysis which may provide better visual quality than MRI enterography, but exposes patients to radiation. Only few data exist of the radiation dose used in fluoroscopy prior to MRI enteroclysis.

During the 12-month study period, all 95 patients (40 men) undergoing MRI enteroclysis with nasojejunal intubation using fluoroscopy for suspicion or evaluation of Crohn's disease were included. Average age at the time of MRI was 40.1 years (range 17-79). Conversion factors from dose-area product to effective dose were determined with a Monte Carlo-based software PCXMC. The conversion factors were determined for a standard-sized adult phantom for posterior-anterior and right-posterior-oblique projections.

The average total time of fluoroscopy was 3 min 17 s (range 0 min 7 s to 31 min). The average effective dose of ionizing radiation was 0.21 mSv (range 0.01-2.67). The average dose is equivalent to 10 PA chest x-rays. Standard deviation was 0.41 mSv. The highest effective dose of a single patient was 2.67 mSv. In comparison, a standard abdominal CT scan causes an effective dose of 12 mSv.

The effective dose of ionizing radiation with nasojejunal intubation is relatively small in the majority of patients. When repeated imaging is necessary, it seems advisable to consider imaging techniques, which do not subject patients to ionizing radiation. Also if a previous nasojejunal intubation has been difficult, a different imaging technique is recommended.

Gastrojejunal (GJ) tubes are increasingly used for enteral feeding in children in whom gastric feeding either is not tolerated or is contraindicated. The most common complications associated with GJ tube use are mechanical failure (clogging, cracking, deterioration) and dislodgement. Less common, but more significant, complications are bowel perforation, aspiration, and feeding intolerance. Some of these complications may be prevented by replacing GJ tubes at regular intervals. Methods to direct a GJ tube include 1) guidewire, 2) gastroduodenoscopy-guidewire, 3) esophagogastroduodenoscopy-forceps, and 4) fluoroscopy-guidewire. Clinical experience to determine the ideal method and optimal timing of GJ tube replacement is evolving. GJ tube replacement using a guidewire through the prior GJ tube, without endoscopy, fluoroscopy, or sedation, is the least risky method, but is also the least likely to be successful.

Little is known about the radiation burden from fluoroscopy-guided insertions of nasojejunal tubes (NJTs) in children. There are no recommended or published standards of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) available.

To establish reference dose area product (DAP) levels for the fluoroscopy-guided insertion of nasojejunal tubes as a basis for setting DRLs for children. In addition, we wanted to assess our local practice and determine the success and complication rates associated with this procedure.

Children who had NJT insertion procedures were identified retrospectively from the fluoroscopy database. The age of the child at the time of the procedure, DAP, screening time, outcome of the procedure, and any complications were recorded for each procedure. As the radiation dose depends on the size of the child, the children were assigned to three different age groups. The sample size, mean, median and third-quartile DAPs were calculated for each group. The third-quartile values were used to establish the DRLs.

Of 186 procedures performed, 172 were successful on the first attempt. These were performed in a total of 43 children with 60% having multiple insertions over time. The third-quartile DAPs were as follows for each age group: 0-12 months, 2.6 cGy cm(2); 1-7 years, 2.45 cGy cm(2); >8 years, 14.6 cGy cm(2). High DAP readings were obtained in the 0-12 months (n = 4) and >8 years (n = 2) age groups. No immediate complications were recorded.

Fluoroscopy-guided insertion of NJTs is a highly successful procedure in a selected population of children and is associated with a low complication rate. The radiation dose per procedure is relatively low.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, clinical effectiveness, and safety of fluoroscopically guided placement of a nasojejunal enteral tube in infants and young children.

Fluoroscopically guided placement of a nasojejunal enteral tube is feasible, effective, and safe for infants and young children.

We describe a method of exchanging a blocked nasojejunal (NJ) tube involving the use of a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty balloon to rupture the tube, followed by insertion of a guidewire through this rupture to create a guide for subsequent placement of a modified NJ tube. We used this technique in a child with a critical need for an NJ tube, in whom routine guidewire exchange was not feasible because of tube obstruction as well as the patient's anatomic abnormalities. This technique might also be useful for other patients in whom standard techniques are ineffective.

Enteral feeding is desirable when the gastrointestinal tract is functional because it allows better use of nutrients, is safer, and is more cost-effective than parenteral nutrition. Feeding through a gastric tube, however, is often not feasible in severely ill adults and children because of gastric paresis leading to recurrent episodes of gastroesophageal reflux with the risk of subsequent aspiration. Feeding into the small intestine (duodenum or jejunum) through a nasointestinal tube, therefore, is preferred. Unfortunately, no method of enteral feeding is risk free. This literature review addresses the following 10 topics: (a) the reasons why nasointestinal tube feeding is better tolerated by some patients, (b) candidates for nasointestinal tube feeding, (c) options for selecting nasointestinal tubes, (d) recommended methods for predicting the distance to insert nasointestinal tubes, (e) recommended methods for placing nasointestinal tubes, (f) how promotility medications work and whether they facilitate nasointestinal tube placement, (g) nasointestinal tube placement error rate, (h) methods of determining the internal location of nasointestinal tubes, (i) complications associated with nasointestinal tube use, and (j) other pertinent issues surrounding feeding through nasointestinal tubes. The available research evidence is summarized and recommendations for future work are suggested.

To report the clinical experiences in the application of clip-assisted endoscopic method for nasoenteric feeding in patients with gastroparesis and patients with gastroesophageal wounds, and to compare the efficacy of nasoenteric feeding in these two indications.

From April 2002 to January 2004, 21 consecutive patients with gastroparesis or gastroesophageal wounds were enrolled and received nasoenteric feeding for nutritional support. A clip-assisted method was used to place the nasoenteric tubes. Outcomes in the two groups were compared with respect to the successful rate of enteral feeding, percentage of recommended energy intake (REI), and complication rates.

The gastroparesis group included 13 patients with major burns (n = 7), trauma (n = 2), congestive heart failure (n = 2) and post-surgery gastric stasis syndrome (n = 2). The esophageogastric wound group included eight patients with tracheoesophageal fistula (n = 2) and wound leakage following gastric surgery (n = 6). Two study groups were similar in feeding successful rates (84.6% vs 75.0%). There were also no differences in the percentage of REI between groups (79.4% vs 78.6%). Additionally, no complications occurred in any of the study groups.

Nasoenteric feeding is a useful method to provide nutritional support to most of the patients with gastroparesis who cannot tolerate nasogastric tube feeding and to the cases who need bypass feeding for esophageogastric wounds.

The provision and maintenance of good nutrition in patients with acute and chronic illness is a fundamental part of standard medical and surgical care. Recently, there is great interest in using enteral nutritional support to reverse the morbidity and mortality associated with malnutrition. Enteral nutrition is preferred over parenteral nutrition because it is more physiologic, maintains intestinal structure and function, limits bacterial translocation, has less morbidity, has fewer complications, and is less expensive. However, the decision to feed into the stomach or into the small bowel (postpyloric) continues to be a matter of some debate and continued clinical investigation. Although the gastric route of enteral feeding is easier and less expensive, some physicians worry that gastric feeding may predispose to aspiration and pneumonia, especially in critically ill patients who frequently have delayed gastric transit. In these critically ill patients, small bowel function usually remains relatively intact and placement of a postpyloric feeding tube may permit more effective delivery of nutrients. However, it should be noted that placement of postpyloric feeding tubes can be challenging, and this may lead to a delay in initiation of nutritional support.

To determine the effect of feeding tube position (gastric vs small bowel) on adequacy of nutrient delivery and feeding complications, including microaspiration, in critically ill children.

Randomized controlled trial.

Pediatric ICU in a university teaching hospital.

Seventy-four critically ill patients < 18 years of age receiving mechanical ventilation were randomized to receive gastric or small-bowel feeding.

All feeding tubes were inserted at the bedside. Color, pH, and bilirubin concentration of the feeding tube aspirates were used to guide placement. Final tube position was confirmed radiographically. Continuous feedings were advanced to achieve a caloric goal based on age and body weight. Tracheal secretions were collected daily and tested for gastric pepsin by immunoassay.

Thirty-two patients were randomized to the gastric group, and 42 patients were randomized to the small-bowel group. Twelve patients exited the study because a small-bowel tube could not be placed at the bedside, leaving 30 patients in the small-bowel group. Gastric and small-bowel groups were similar at baseline in age, sex, percentage of ideal body weight, serum prealbumin concentration, and pediatric risk of mortality score. The percentage of daily caloric goal achieved was less in the gastric group compared to the small-bowel group (30 +/- 23% vs 47 +/- 22%, p < 0.01). No difference was found in the proportion of tracheal aspirates positive for pepsin between the gastric and small-bowel groups (50 of 146 aspirates vs 50 of 172 aspirates, respectively; p = 0.3). No differences were found in the frequency of feeding tube displacement, abdominal distension, vomiting, or diarrhea between groups.

Small-bowel feeds allow a greater amount of nutrition to be successfully delivered to critically ill children. Small-bowel feeds do not prevent aspiration of gastric contents.

Jejunal feeding is an attractive means for delivering nutrients to critically ill patients. Nasojejunal tubes may have different advantages and disadvantages that may have important clinical implications.

To compare the suitability of 2 different nasojejunal feeding tubes (Tube A, Dobbhoff; Tube B, Freka-Trelumina) for use by endoscopists and nursing staff, a randomized, controlled, prospective trial was performed in 60 patients. The primary end point was time required for tube placement. Secondary end points were successful placement and nursing problems encountered during clinical use. Results of upper endoscopy were also recorded.

Placement took significantly longer with Tube A than Tube B (95% CI for median [11.5, 20.0] minutes vs. [5.5, 7.5] minutes; p < 0.001), and was less successful (73.3% vs. 90%; p = 0.18). Nursing problems occurred significantly more often with Tube A compared with Tube B (11 vs. 1; p < 0.001). Tube B stayed in place significantly longer than Tube A (37 days vs. 21 days; p = 0.034). In 45% of the cases, upper endoscopy provided a diagnosis of potential therapeutic relevance.

Selection of a nasojejunal tube for endoscopic placement has significant implications with respect to time required for placement, duration of tube usage and the practicability for nursing staff. Diagnostic upper endoscopy performed concomitantly often reveals findings of clinical importance.

As no consistent predictor of insertion tube distance has been determined for intestinal feeding tubes and fluoroscopic placement is very expensive, this study sought a reliable method of blind placement.

This cross-sectional study measured the internal distance from the lip to the pylorus in 387 children undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and compared those measurements to the external distances measured from the nose around the ear to the 10th rib and lip around the ear to the 10th rib.

Regression equations using height fitted in four age groups were the best predictors of the internal pyloric distances.

Predicting this distance with height may help healthcare providers be more successful in blind placement of intestinal feeding tubes. A table of predicted nasointestinal tube insertion distances is included.

The requirements of growth and organ development create a challenge in nutrition management for the pediatric patient. The stress of critical illness further complicates the delivery of adequate nutrients. Enteral feeding has several advantages over parenteral nutrition (PN), which include preservation of the gastrointestinal mucosa and decreasing the occurrence of sepsis related to bacterial translocation. Although feeding through the gastrointestinal tract is the preferred route for nutritional management, there are specific instances when PN as adjunctive or sole therapy is necessary to meet nutritional needs. With meticulous attention to fluid, caloric, protein, and fat requirements along with monitoring the metabolic status of the patient, it is possible to provide full nutritional support for the critically ill child within 24 to 48 hours of hospital admission.

Nasogastric feeding in intensive care is poorly tolerated as a result of gastroparesis. Transpyloric (TP) feeding has been limited by difficulty in tube placement. This study was to independently validate the success rate of a previously published bedside TP feeding tube (FT) placement technique.

Prospective interventional study.

Tertiary pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in a university hospital.

Children whose intensivist requested TP feeding, and who were without known fundoplication, pharyngeal trauma, or gastric ulceration.

After informed consent, an unweighted polyurethane feeding tube with a flexible wire stylet was inserted using a standard technique with metoclopramide, right lateral position, and air insufflation during advancement until <2 mL air could be aspirated after insufflation of 5-10 mL air. The tubes were inserted by one of the authors, whose training was only to observe one insertion, then perform one insertion with supervision.

Patient demographics, procedural data, and success rate based on radiography were prospectively recorded. There were 71 insertions on 38 patients from February 1999 to October 1999. Patients were aged 56 +/- 69.8 months, weighed 17.8 +/- 18 kg, 69% were ventilated, and 56% received procedural sedation. Success rate for TP-FT placement was 63/71 insertions (88.7%) in an average of 7.43 +/- 6.85 mins (median, 5 mins; range, <1-45 mins); of 38 patients, 36 had a successful TP- FT (95%). Insertion was well tolerated. Of the successful TP-FTs, on day 1 (n = 63) the FT was in distal duodenum or jejunum in 51% and by days 3-5 (n = 51), this increased to 75%.

Bedside placement of a TP-FT with this technique is simple, rapid, well tolerated, and highly successful with little training. Immediate radiograph to confirm TP placement may not always be necessary. In our experience, this technique has obviated the need to search for another method to achieve a transpyloric feeding tube.

To determine the validity of five indicators (color, pH, and concentrations of bilirubin, pepsin, and trypsin in aspirated gastrointestinal secretions) in predicting postpyloric placement of feeding tubes in critically ill children.

Prospective, observational study.

University teaching hospital.

A total of 96 gastrointestinal aspirates were obtained from 53 children requiring placement of a nasoenteric feeding tube.

Feeding tubes were aspirated by applying suction with a 20-mL syringe. Repeat aspirates from the same patient were obtained on different days. All aspirations were performed within 30 mins of obtaining a radiograph to assess tube position.

Aspirates were inspected visually for color. pH and bilirubin concentrations were determined at the bedside by using reagent strips. Pepsin and trypsin concentrations were measured spectrophotometrically in a research laboratory. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and efficiency for each indicator and their 95% confidence intervals were determined based on the position of the feeding tube on the radiograph. Aspirate pH > or =6 had the lowest positive predictive value (76%, range 67% to 85%) but high negative predictive value (94%, range 89% to 99%) for determining postpyloric positioning of the feeding tube. Bilirubin concentration > or =5 mg/dL (> or =86 micromol/L) had the highest positive predictive value (96%, range 91% to 100%) and lowest negative predictive value (88%, range 81% to 95%). Overall efficiency was best for the appearance of a clear yellow aspirate color (93%, range 88% to 98%), pepsin concentration < or =20 microg/mL (94%, range 89% to 99%), and trypsin concentration > or =50 microg/mL (94%, range 89% to 99%).

Simple bedside assessment of gastrointestinal aspirate color, pH, and bilirubin concentration is useful for predicting feeding tube position. Use of these tests may reduce the number of radiographic studies needed to confirm postpyloric positioning. Laboratory-determined pepsin and trypsin concentrations predict tube position with a high degree of accuracy. Development of simple and inexpensive bedside tests for the detection of gastrointestinal enzymes may be useful.

To test the effectiveness of gastric insufflation as an adjunct to placement of feeding tubes in the small bowel.

Prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Pediatric intensive care unit in a tertiary children's hospital.

A total of 50 children requiring enteral nutrition via a nasoenteral feeding tube in the small bowel.

An unweighted nasoenteral feeding tube attached to a three-way stopcock and a 60 mL syringe was inserted through the nares into the stomach. After 10 mL/kg of air was injected, the tube was advanced a distance estimated to position the tip of the tube proximal to the pylorus. An additional 10 mL/kg of air was then injected, and the tube was advanced a distance needed to place the tube in the fourth part of the duodenum. In the control group, feeding tubes were inserted through the nares and into the stomach. The tube was then advanced a distance estimated to place the tube in the fourth part of the duodenum. No air was injected in the control group.

When gastric insufflation was used, 23 of 25 feeding tubes were successfully placed in the small bowel on the first attempt compared with 11 of 25 in the control group (p = .001). All feeding tubes were successfully placed after two attempts in the gastric insufflation group compared with 18 of 25 in the control group (p < .001). The time between the first attempt at placement of a transpyloric feeding tube and the initiation of feeding was significantly shorter in the study group than in the control group. There were no complications in either group.

Gastric insufflation allows rapid placement of feeding tubes into the small bowel with fewer attempts compared with a standard insertion technique in children.

Nutrition is important in childhood because the child has a lower energy reserve than the adult and a higher demand for calories because of ongoing growth. In this study, the utility of transpyloric enteral feeding (TEF) in critically ill children was evaluated.

A prospective, descriptive study was made in a pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary pediatric center of 41 critically ill children, 30 after surgical procedures and 11 with nonsurgical illness, aged 8 days to 12 years, who received transpyloric enteral feeding with 8- or 10-Fr weighted feeding tubes. Analysis was made of tolerance and complications (vomiting, abdominal distension, excessive gastric residual, diarrhea, and pulmonary aspiration) of TEF.

The mean duration of TEF was 19.5 +/- 26.8 days (range, 1-120 days). The administration of sedative agents or inotropic drugs did not alter toleration of TEF. Eight of 12 patients treated with continuous infusion of vecuronium tolerated TEF without complications. Eleven gastrointestinal complications occurred in 10 patients, abdominal distension and excessive gastric residual in 7 (17%), and diarrhea in 4 (9.7%). In 7 patients gastrointestinal complications improved, with decreasing use or transitory interruption of TEF, but in 4 patients (9.7%), TEF had to be withdrawn. Gastrointestinal complications were more frequent in postsurgical than in nonsurgical patients (p < 0.001). No patients suffered from pulmonary aspiration, and the incidence of pulmonary infection and hepatic dysfunction diminished during TEF.

Transpyloric enteral feeding is a good method of nutritional support in critically ill children and can be used in patients treated with neuromuscular blocking agents. The frequency and severity of complications and the risks of pulmonary infection and hepatic dysfunction related to TEF are low.

To determine whether a clinical, nonradiographic criterion can be used to predict when the tip of a blindly placed feeding tube is in the small intestine.

Prospective sample.

Pediatric intensive care unit at a tertiary care children's hospital.

Critically ill children requiring transpyloric feeding.

The small bowel was intubated, using a blind, bedside transpyloric feeding tube placement protocol. The feeding tube was considered to be in the small bowel when <2 mL of a 10- mL aliquot of insufflated air could be aspirated from the feeding tube. This clinical criterion was confirmed with an abdominal radiograph.

Patient age ranged from 1 month to 19 yrs (median 6 months). Weight ranged from 2.2 to 60 kg (median 4.9). Median time to feeding tube placement was 10 mins (range 5 to 60). Eighty-nine percent of the patients were mechanically ventilated, while 28% of these patients were pharmacologically paralyzed. Seventy-five feeding tubes were inserted. There were no known complications. Ninety-nine (74/75) percent of the feeding tubes were positioned in the small bowel. The inability to aspirate insufflated air correctly predicted small bowel intubation with 99% certainty (Sequential Probability Ratio Test, p = .05 and power = .80). This test incorrectly predicted the position of only one feeding tube, the 26th, which was in the stomach. Of the 74 feeding tubes positioned in the small bowel, 13 feeding tubes were in the duodenum and 61 were in the jejunum.

The inability to aspirate insufflated air confirms the transpyloric position of a feeding tube. Other clinical criteria did not successfully predict small bowel intubation. Use of this single test may obviate confirmatory abdominal radiographs in carefully selected patients and may lead to more cost-effective and timely initiation of enteral feedings.

The small bowel of critically ill infants and small children was cannulated using a soft feeding tube with a pH sensor at the distal tip. By monitoring pH, the tubes were guided through the stomach into the small bowel.

Successful placements were performed in 36 of 37 (97%) attempts in 29 critically ill patients whose age was 7.9 +/- 6.3 months and weight was 5.9 +/- 2.6 kg. Continuous jejunal feedings were administered for 3.7 +/- 3.1 weeks without difficulties or complications in all but one patient.

pH-guided jejunal tube placement provides a safe, easy bedside alternative to fluoroscopic, endoscopic or surgical placement in critically ill infants and small children.