Ultrasound-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy (USPCB) is used extensively in daily clinical practice for the pathologic confirmation of both focal and diffuse diseases of the abdominal viscera. As a guidance tool, US has a number of clear advantages over computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging: fewer false-negative biopsies, lack of ionizing radiation, portability, relatively short procedure time, real-time intra-procedural visualization of the biopsy needle, ability to guide the procedure in almost any anatomic plane, and relatively lower cost. Notably, USPCB is widely used to retrieve tissue specimens in cases of hepatic lesions. However, general radiologists, particularly beginners, find USPCB difficult to perform in abdominal organs other than the liver; indeed, a full understanding of the entire USPCB process and specific considerations for specific abdominal organs is necessary to safely obtain adequate specimens. In this review, we discuss some points and techniques that need to be borne in mind to increase the chances of successful USPCB. We believe that the tips and considerations presented in this review will help radiologists perform USPCB to successfully retrieve target tissue from different organs with minimal complications.

The evaluation of pancreatic lesions, from solid pancreatic masses to pancreatic cysts, remains a clinical challenge. Although cross-sectional imaging remains the cornerstone of the initial evaluation of an indeterminate pancreatic lesion, advances in imaging with the advent of endoscopic ultrasound scan, elastography, contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound scan, and probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy have allowed us to visualize the pancreas in even higher resolution and diagnose premalignant and malignant lesions of the pancreas with improved accuracy. This report reviews the range of imaging tools currently available to evaluate pancreatic lesions, from solid tumors to pancreatic cysts.

Tumor samples are required for pathological examinations, and different instruments are generally used to obtain samples of different types of tumors. Among the many methods available for obtaining tumor tissues, gun biopsy is widely used because it is much simpler than incisional biopsy and can collect many more samples than aspiration biopsy. However, conventional biopsy guns cannot simultaneously perform biopsy aspiration, bleeding prevention, and marker injection. In this study, we developed a biopsy gun that can simultaneously perform biopsy aspiration and sample collection, in addition to injecting a styptic agent and marker to prevent bleeding and contamination in the biopsy track. We then used a prototype to evaluate the feasibility of the developed device. The collectable sample size was also assessed. Performance of the biopsy aspiration feature was also evaluated, including the maximum aspiration viscosity. Finally, we tested the maximum amount of drug that can be injected. We found that the biopsy gun developed here is an alternative tool for biopsy collection with improved procedure safety and diagnostic accuracy.

Needle tract seeding refers to implantation of tumor cells by contamination when instruments like biopsy needles are used to examine, excise or ablate a tumor. Implantation along needle tract may lead to change of stage of the tumor, converting a resectable tumor into an inoperable one. In this paper we have reviewed the cases of needle tract seeding due to fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) procedure. We analyzed the various aspects of needle tract seedling and suggested how to take precautionary measures to prevent it.

Clinicians and pathologists are sporadically asked by owners whether the taking of tumour biopsies may affect the behaviour of the tumour, including its potential to metastasise. Unfortunately, systematic studies on this subject are unavailable in veterinary medicine, and the aim of this study was to estimate the risk of adverse effects of biopsy taking on tumour progression in animals. A systematic review of veterinary and human case reports and clinical studies as well as experimental animal models of biopsy-induced tumour metastasis was undertaken. There were only two veterinary case reports of needle tract metastases (NTM) following the taking of needle biopsies from urogenital and pulmonary tumours. Seventeen experimental studies found a high incidence of NTM but only a rat osteosarcoma and a hamster squamous carcinoma model showed an increased incidence of distant or regional metastases after incision or excision biopsy. In human medicine, the occurrence of NTM has been reported after the taking of biopsies from mesotheliomas (15%), melanomas (11%) and gall bladder tumours (11%), liver metastases of colon carcinomas (4%) and mammary carcinomas (4%) but an incidence of only <1% for all other tumours. Circulating tumour cells increased immediately after the taking of biopsies from human squamous cell, prostate, breast and hepatocellular carcinomas. Although no increased risk of biopsy-induced distant metastasis has been reported for any type of tumour, this is inconclusive due to a lack of non-biopsied control groups in human studies. Reports of biopsy-induced metastasis in animal tumours indicate that the taking of transcutaneous biopsies from urogenital tumours may be associated with a risk of NTM. However, there is no evidence of a general increase in risk of distant metastases in any tumour type in people or animals. The overall risk therefore appears to be negligible when compared to the valuable information obtained from biopsies in veterinary practice.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) fine needle aspiration (FNA) can result in false-positive cytology and can also cause needle tract seeding. Our goal was to evaluate a potential cause, namely, the presence of malignant cells within gastrointestinal (GI) luminal fluid, either as a result of tumor sloughing from luminal cancers or secondary to FNA of extraluminal sites.

During EUS, luminal fluid that is usually aspirated through the echoendoscope suction channel and discarded was instead submitted for cytological analysis among patients with cancer and benign disease. Pre- and post-FNA luminal fluid samples were collected to discern the role of FNA in inducing a positive cytology. When not performing FNA, one sample was collected for the entire examination. The final diagnosis was based on strict clinicopathological criteria and >or=2-year follow-up. This study was conducted in a tertiary referral center.

We assessed the prevalence of luminal fluid-positive cytology among patients with luminal (e.g., esophageal), extraluminal (e.g., pancreatic), and benign disease. Among the 140 patients prospectively enrolled with sufficient sampling and follow-up, an examination of luminal fluid cytology showed positive results for malignancy in luminal and extraluminal cancer patients, 48 and 10%, respectively. This included 8 out of 23 esophageal, 4 of 5 gastric, and 9 of 15 rectal cancers. The positive luminal fluid cytology rate with luminal cancers was not affected by performing FNA. Post-FNA luminal fluid cytology was positive in 3 out of 26 with pancreatic cancers. Cytological examination of luminal fluid aspirates did not demonstrate malignant cells in any patient with nonmalignant disease.

Malignant cells are commonly present in the GI luminal fluid of patients with luminal cancers and can also be found in patients with pancreatic cancer after EUS FNA. Further study is needed to determine the impact of these findings on cytological interpretation, staging, risk of needle tract seeding, and patient care and outcomes.

Despite a growing body of evidence reporting the deleterious mechanical and oncological complications of biopsy of hepatic malignancy, a small but significant number of patients undergo the procedure prior to specialist surgical referral. Biopsy has been shown to result in poorer longterm survival following resection and advances in modern imaging modalities provide equivalent, or better, diagnostic accuracy.

The literature relating to needle-tract seeding of primary and secondary liver cancers was reviewed. MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched for case reports and series relating to the oncological complications of biopsy of liver malignancies. Current non-invasive diagnostic modalities are reviewed and their diagnostic accuracy presented.

Biopsy of malignant liver lesions has been shown to result in poorer longterm survival following resection and does not confer any diagnostic advantage over a combination of non-invasive imaging techniques and serum tumour markers.

Given that chemotherapeutic advances now often permit downstaging and subsequent resection of 'unresectable' disease, the time has come to abandon biopsy of solid lesions outside the setting of a specialist multi-disciplinary team meeting (MDT).

The aim was to determine the survival of patients with advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer in relation to whether they underwent nonsurgical biopsy of their primary tumor.

A total of 1481 patients with distant stage pancreatic cancer diagnosed between 1992 and 2001 who underwent radiation treatment but not cancer-directed surgery were analyzed. The design is a retrospective cohort study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program of the US National Cancer Institute. Survival curves were created using Kaplan-Meier method and compared via log-rank test.

Of 1481 patients (median age, 66 years) included in our analysis, 1406 (95%) underwent nonsurgical biopsy (95%) and 75 (5%) did not. There was no statistically significant difference in overall median survival according to receipt of nonsurgical biopsy (Kaplan-Meier curve, log-rank test = 0.09). A subgroup analysis of patients younger than 65 years who did not undergo biopsy revealed a hazard ratio of 1.76 (95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.72); that is, there was a 76% higher hazard for death among younger patients who did not undergo biopsy compared with those who did (P = 0.011).

Nonsurgical biopsy did not seem to negatively impact survival among patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for pancreatic solid tumors larger or smaller than 3 cm, and cystic lesions.

From January/1997 to December/2006, 611 patients with pancreatic tumors were subjected to EUS-FNA. The final diagnosis was obtained either by surgery (356 cases) or after a mean clinical follow-up of 11.8 mo in the remaining patients.

There were 405 solid tumors, 189 cystic lesions and 17 mixed. Pancreatic specimens for cytological assessment were successfully obtained by EUS-FNA in 595 (97.4%) cases. There were 352 (57.6%) malignancies and 259 (42.4%) benign tumors. Among the malignancies, pancreatic adenocarcinomas accounted for 67% of the lesions. Overall, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of EUS-FNA were, respectively, 78.4%, 99.2%, 99.3%, 77.2% and 87.2%. Specifically for solid tumors, the same parameters for neoplasms larger and smaller than 3 cm were, respectively, 78.8% vs 82.4%, 100% vs 98.4%, 100% vs 99%, 54.8% vs 74.1% and 83.1% vs 87.8%. For cystic lesions, the values were, respectively, 72.2%, 99.3%, 97.5%, 91% and 92.2%.

EUS-FNA can be used to sample pancreatic tumors in most patients. Even though the negative predictive value is inadequate for large solid tumors, the results are rather good for small solid tumors, especially concerning the sensitivity, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy. Among all pancreatic lesions, EUS-FNA for cystic lesions can reveal the best negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy, both higher than 90%.

Pancreatic cancer is the 4th leading cause of cancer death annually. Recent technological advances in imaging have led to non-uniformity in the evaluation of pancreatic neoplasms. The following article describes the history behind various biopsy techniques and the rationale for obtaining a biopsy of a pancreatic neoplasm and discusses the benefits and disadvantages of the various pancreatic biopsy techniques, including fine needle aspiration biopsy, Tru-cut needle biopsy, endoscopic brushings/cytology, and endoscopic ultrasound guided biopsies. A treatment algorithm for pancreatic neoplasms is then presented.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an alternative to percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT) for single non-surgical hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the risk of seeding along the needle track has been reported.

Seven patients presenting with neoplastic seeding after RFA or PEIT were treated with external beam radiotherapy using conventional fractionation. All patients underwent irradiation with a total dose in the range of 44-61 Gy (median and mode value: 50 Gy).

An objective response to treatment was achieved in six of seven patients (86%). A complete response was obtained in two patients (29%). The median survival time was 14.7 months and the actuarial 1- and 2-year survivals were 67% and 50%, respectively.

The response to treatment was relatively good without serious complications. Seeding from hepatocellular carcinoma is sensitive to external beam radiotherapy. It is useful in the treatment of these patients with 50 Gy in 25 fractions.

Lung cancer dissemination has been cited as a potential adverse consequence of diagnostic percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) of lung nodules. Despite multiple reports in the literature of malignant spread along the needle track, the potential effect of lung cancer dissemination after PTNB on survival is unknown.

To evaluate whether diagnostic PTNB is associated with increased risk of lung cancer death.

This study included 8,607 cases of surgically resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed between 1991 and 1999 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry linked to Medicare records. Overall and lung cancer-specific survival of patients who had and did not have PTNB was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves. Stratified survival analyses and Cox regression were used to compare survival with adjustment for potential confounders.

Approximately 36% of patients underwent diagnostic PTNB. Overall and lung cancer-specific survival did not differ in patients that underwent PTNB as part of their cancer diagnostic work-up and those who did not (p = 0.57 and 0.46, respectively). In stratified and multivariate analysis, PTNB was not associated with an increased risk of death after controlling for age, race, income, access to care, comorbidities, tumor histology and size, and type of treatment received.

In this large national sample, preoperative PTNB was not associated with increased risk of death. These data suggest that PTNB can be safely used for the work-up of pulmonary nodules when there is a suspicion of lung cancer.

The aim of our study was to update the rate of severe complications following CT-guided needle biopsy in Japan via a mailed survey.

Postal questionnaires regarding CT-guided needle biopsy were sent out to multiple hospitals in Japan. The questions regarded: the total number and duration of CT-guided lung biopsies performed at each hospital, and the complication rates and numbers of pneumothorax, hemothorax, air embolism, tumor seeding, tension pneumothorax and other rare complications. Each severe complication was followed with additional questions.

Data from 9783 biopsies was collected from 124 centers. Pneumothorax was the most common complication, and occurred in 2412 (35%) of 6881 cases. A total of 39 (35%) hospitals reported 74 (0.75%) cases with severe complications. There were six cases (0.061%) with air embolism, six cases (0.061%) with tumor seeding at the site of the biopsy route, 10 cases (0.10%) with tension pneumothorax, six cases (0.061%) with severe pulmonary hemorrhage or hemoptysis, nine cases (0.092%) with hemothorax, and 27 cases (0.26%) with others, including heart arrest, shock, and respiratory arrest. From a total of 62 patients with severe complications, 54 patients (0.55%) recovered without sequela, however one patient (0.01%) recovered with hemiplegia due to cerebral infarction, and the remaining seven patients (0.07%) died.

This is the first national study documenting severe complications with respect to CT-guided needle biopsy in Japan. The complication rate in Japan is comparable to internationally published figures. We believe this data will improve both clinicians as well as patients understanding of the risk versus benefit of CT-guided needle biopsy, resulting better decisions.

The clinical significance of "fullness" or enlargement of the pancreas (FP/EP) is not well established. The objective of this study was to report our experience with endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in evaluating patients referred for FP/EP found on computed tomography (CT).

Patients referred to our center for EUS evaluation of FP/EP between January 1998 and December 2003 were studied. Patient demographics, clinical history, endoscopic findings, and follow-up were recorded. Multivariate analysis was used to identify predictors of pancreatic malignancy.

A total of 50 patients: 46% (23/50) male, mean age 59 years (range, 18-90) made up our studied population. EUS demonstrated normal findings in 42% (21/50), prominent ventral anlage (embryologic variant) in 14% (7/50), and chronic pancreatitis in 22% (11/50). In 22% (11/50), a suspicious mass was noted and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) was performed. Cytology revealed chronic inflammation in 7 patients, while adenocarcinoma was found in the remaining 4. Median follow-up was 27 months, and the diagnosis did not change in any of the 50 patients. There were no procedure-related complications. After multivariant regression analysis, the factors that were statistically associated with malignancy were a CA19-9 level >300 (P = .0002) and weight loss (P < .006).

The majority of patients presenting with FP/EP had benign disease, but 8% had pancreatic cancer. Elevated CA19-9 and weight loss were predictive of pancreatic malignancy. EUS and EUS-FNA are safe and accurate diagnostic tests and can play an important role in evaluating patients with FP/EP.

The diagnosis of hepatic cystadenoma is difficult with the conventional radiologic imaging. When these hepatobiliary cystic tumors are located in the left liver, Echoendoscopic ultrasound/Fine needle aspiration can help in the diagnosis by showing high levels of cystic CEA and CA 19-9 in a mucinous fluid. Definitive histological evaluation is assessed by the examination of the operative specimen.

Patients who present with signs and symptoms suggesting a pancreatic neoplasm typically undergo initial imaging with transabdominal ultrasound or CT. When a pancreatic mass or fullness is identified, it may represent an inflammatory mass, benign process, or malignancy. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is performed commonly to further characterize the lesion, obtain a tissue diagnosis, and for staging. This article reviews the role of EUS for the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic tumors.

Seeding of biopsy needle tracks with viable malignant cells was an initial concern with all diagnostic breast needle procedures, including 14G automated needle biopsy. In an attempt to further evaluate this phenomenon, we have addressed the following questions: (1) are the tracks left by the needle biopsy procedure detectable in the surgical excision specimen? (2) Are displaced tumour cells visible along the needle tracks? (3) Is it possible to identify and excise the entire needle track for thorough histopathologic evaluation?

Surgical biopsy specimens of patients previously diagnosed with cancer on stereotactic 14G-needle biopsy were studied to find needle tracks. These are characterised by hemosiderin, scar tissue, foreign body giant cell reaction, fat necrosis, or organizing haemorrhage. Occurrence of displaced tumour cells or groups of cells along the tracks was registered.

Needle tracks were found in 22/64 excision specimens of patients who underwent 14G-needle biopsy and surgery on the same day. Tumour-cell displacement along the needle track was seen in 11/22 cases (50%). In a prospective study, an attempt was made to excise the entire needle track in 13 consecutive cancer cases after 14G biopsy. Median time interval between core biopsy and first surgical excision was 21 days (range 7-35). Needle tracks could be visualised in 11/13 cases; displaced cells were seen in seven.

Needle tracks can be found in the excision specimens of patients who previously underwent 14G biopsy, and displaced tumour cells can be recognised. Excision of the entire needle track is neither feasible, nor advisable as a routine measure, since radiotherapy is advised for both in situ and invasive carcinoma after conservative surgery.

Tumor implantation along the needle tract following percutaneous procedures under ultrasonographic guidance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and pancreatic carcinoma (PC) has been well documented. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the correlation between the procedure, the pathologic differentiation of the primary tumor, and the treatment after implantation. Between July 1992 and March 2000, HCC patients (n=372) who underwent biopsy, percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) therapy and percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy (PMCT) and PC (n=73) patients who underwent biopsy were retrospectively studied. Needle tract implantation was found in six of the HCC patients (1.6%) and one of the PC patients (1.4%). The interval to diagnosis ranged from 5 to 25 months (mean +/- SD 11.2 +/- 7.6 months) in the HCC patients. The needle tract implantation was evident for all procedure types in these patients (two after PEI alone, two after both biopsy and PEI, and one after PMCT) and for each degree of pathologic differentiation of the primary tumors (well differentiated in one, moderately differentiated in two, and poorly differentiated in one). Each implanted tumor was surgically resected, with no recurrence at the focal lesion. These results suggest that needle tract implantation develops regardless of the procedure or the pathologic differentiation of the primary tumor, and that surgical resection might be effective for controlling these implanted lesions.

Prior reports of CT-guided lung biopsy of the small lung nodules of less than 2 cm have been unsatisfactory. In January 1998, we began a preliminary study of CT-guided lung biopsy in our conventional CT room. With the basic results achieved, we constructed a novel CT-guided lung biopsy system. Together with Hitachi Corporation we have developed CT, the Radix Prima, exclusive for interventional procedures especially for CT-guided lung biopsy. As reconstruction delay time of the procedures has been shortened from 1.0 sec. to 0.6 sec., real time CT fluoroscopy monitoring is possible on the Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) monitor in the CT room, very closed to the patient. Multiple confirmations of the tip of the biopsy needle have been possible with this specially equipped CT. A semi-automatic-type needle have been selected for reliable biopsy, because the old fully-automatic-type needle was very heavy and easily misfired. Multiple punctures have been also used, because single punctures have a greater risk of obtaining inadequate specimens. In our clinical study at our IVR center, the subjects comprised 41 patients (26 males, 15 females, ranging in age from 34 to 79, mean 64 years old). The mean nodule diameter was 1.9 cm, the mean distance from skin surface to lesion was 5.5 cm, and the mean number of punctures was 3.0. The biopsy results included 23 malignancies. In 13 patients the results were benign tumors or specific inflammation. In 4 patients the results were nonspecific inflammation. In only 1 patient was the specimen inadequate. There was no false negative. The correct rate of benign/malignant diagnoses was 98%. A complication of pneumothorax was observed in 22 patients, but all were improved by conservative treatment. Pulmonary hemorrhage was observed in 21 patients, 7 of whom also had hemoptysis. Each of these patients also responded to conservative treatment from specialist medical staff at the IVR center. The 98%accuracy of our results indicates that multiple punctures using a semi-automatic-type biopsy needle and multiple confirmations of the needle tip on our method of real time CT fluoroscopy are extremely important for CT-guided lung biopsy of small lung nodules of less than 2 cm.

A differential therapy of chronic pancreatitis and carcinoma calls for evaluation of the validity of findings. Presurgical suspicion of a carcinoma often requires intrasurgical diagnostics such as excisional biopsies, punch biopsies, and fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) for confirmation.

To evaluate FNAC as an intraoperative diagnostic method of very high probability.

Intrasurgical fine-needle aspiration biopsy and cytologic assessment were carried out in 474 patients. The indications for operative therapy and FNAC were suspicion of pancreatic tumor, chronic pancreatitis even without suspicion of tumor, and pathologic alterations found during other surgeries in the upper abdomen.

The level of sensitivity was 93.1%, specificity was 99.1%, predictive value of positive results was 99.2% and of negative results was 92.1%.

FNAC is a suitable method for intrasurgical confirmation of pancreatic carcinoma. It can be performed safely, effectively, and rapidly.

Localized tumor implantation of the ventral abdominal wall was found at 2, 5, and 8 months following percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of transitional carcinoma of the bladder, urethra, or prostate in 3 dogs. To our knowledge this complication has not been reported in dogs following FNAB. Despite the rarity of needle-tract implantation, the potential for this complication with transitional cell carcinomas is apparently not negligible and warrants consideration. We recommend traumatic urethral catheterization to obtain a cytologic diagnosis of potential transitional cell carcinomas of the lower urinary tract or prostate whenever possible until more information becomes available. However, needle-track implantation is so rare that it should not influence the decision to perform a percutaneous FNAB if the urethra cannot be catheterized.

The vast majority of patients developing obstructive jaundice will have an underlying malignancy. When the etiology of the obstruction cannot be defined prior to operative intervention, identification of a non-malignant process will occur only subsequent to a major operation. The clinical course of a patient with complete distal common bile duct obstruction as the result of pancreatic heterotopia is discussed. This uncommon diagnosis prompted a review of the literature on this subject enabling this detailed discussion inclusive of the embryology, prevalence and clinical presentations of this entity. Our review further identified a varied group of other non-malignant causes of biliary obstruction that may be mistakenly interpreted to represent biliary or pancreatic malignancy.

Metastases to the pancreas are usually found incidentally. Tissue diagnosis is imperative because imaging alone is incapable of differentiating them from primary pancreatic tumors. This study tested whether it is possible to differentiate metastases from other focal pancreatic lesions by using EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for cytodiagnosis.

One hundred fourteen consecutive patients (mean age 61 years) with focal pancreatic masses, detected on CT, underwent EUS-FNA by using a linear-array echoendoscope and 22-gauge needles.

Adequate specimens were obtained from 112 lesions. Carcinomas were identified in 68 cases (60.7%), 56 (50%) of pancreatic origin and 12 (10.7%) from distant primary tumors. The metastases were all located in the head and body of the pancreas and measured 1.8 to 4.0 cm. The echo-texture was heterogeneous or hypoechoic in all cases and resembled that of primary tumors. Six of the 12 patients with metastatic disease had a prior diagnosis of cancer (breast, 3; renal cell, 2; salivary gland, 1), 4 of them with a recurrence and 2 with a second carcinoma metastasizing to the pancreas. Six patients without a prior diagnosis of cancer had metastases from renal cell, colonic, ovarian, and esophageal carcinomas; one metastasis was from an unknown primary and another was from a malignant lymphoma. These findings influenced the therapeutic strategy in 8 patients who underwent nonsurgical palliation. There were no complications.

Pancreatic metastasis is an important cause of focal pancreatic lesions, but the EUS features are not diagnostic. Simultaneous EUS-FNA allows cytodiagnosis and can have a decisive influence on the selection of appropriate therapeutic strategies.

Organ preserving pancreatic resections are considered whenever malignant disease is ruled out. In tumors of low malignant potential such as cystadenomas and neuroendocrine tumors, the diagnosis is rarely established preoperatively. We studied the feasibility of cytodiagnosis using endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration in determining the operative approach.

A total of 78 patients (16 female, 62 male; mean age 61.4 yr, range 31-82 yr) with focal pancreatic lesions underwent EUS-FNA. Final diagnosis was confirmed by histology, cytology, or clinical follow up (>9 months). Patients with tumors of low malignant potential were managed by customized pancreatic resections.

Final diagnosis was malignant tumors in 36 patients, tumors of low malignant potential in nine (six, neuroendocrine, two, borderline mucinous cystadenomas, one, borderline adenocarcinoma), and benign in 31 (two inadequate smears). No complications occurred. With six false-negative and no false-positive results, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 92%, 84%, 100%, 100%, and 86%, respectively. Five patients with low malignant tumors underwent duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection, three mid segment resection, and one pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy.

EUS-FNA is useful in the preoperative cytodiagnosis of pancreatic tumors of low malignant potential. It extends the indication for organ-preserving pancreatic resections and avoids the unnecessary sacrifice of adjacent organs.

The number of core biopsies done for breast abnormalities is increasing. The risk of skin seeding resulting from core biopsy is unknown.

Consecutive patients diagnosed with breast cancer were studied. The skin and subcutaneous fat surrounding the site of core needle penetration were excised and studied by routine histologic staining. Findings were correlated with other clinical variables.

Eighty-nine consecutive patients were studied. Thirty-one had stereotactic core biopsies, 23 had vacuum-assisted biopsy, 8 had multiple-puncture biopsy, and 58 had ultrasound-guided core biopsy. Two patients who were biopsied using multiple-puncture biopsy were found to have nests of cancer cells in the dermis. One of these patients had recurrence in the skin biopsy site at 34 months.

Skin seeding may be important in light of increasing use of image-directed biopsy, and particularly for cases in which the biopsy puncture site is outside the index quadrant and in which no radiation is anticipated.

We describe herein the case of a 51-year-old woman in whom metastatic tumor seeding of the percutanenous transhepatic biliary drainage tract occurred following a pancreatoduodenectomy for carcinoma of the distal common bile duct. An abdominal computed tomography scan done 6 months after the initial operation detected a hepatic lesion located at the site of the previous percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage tract. Implantation of bile duct carcinoma in the drainage tract was diagnosed, and the recurrent tumor was successfully resected by performing a subsegmentectomy of segment 3 and removal of the adjacent abdominal wall. At present, 5 years and 4 months after the second resection, the patient is in good health without any signs of recurrence. This case report demonstrates that an aggressive surgical approach should be performed for tumor seeding of a transhepatic biliary catheter tract.

To review the imaging features of mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) of the pancreas and to highlight difficulties in differentiating these lesions from pancreatic pseudocysts.

The imaging investigations, case notes and histopathology of 13 patients who underwent surgery for an MCN of the pancreas, were reviewed.

An erroneous diagnosis of a pancreatic pseudocyst had been made in five of the 13 cases and in two patients cystenterostomy had been performed. Only one patient had a documented history of acute pancreatitis although mildly elevated serum amylase levels were identified in a further five cases. CT and US correctly diagnosed a cystic pancreatic mass in all 13 patients, however cross-sectional imaging features of neoplasia, such as septae, cyst wall calcification, focal thickening of the cyst wall and papillary projections, were absent in five (38%) cases. Coexistent imaging features of chronic pancreatitis were present in five of the 13 patients and in six resected specimens. Cyst wall calcification occurred only in malignant lesions and there was no relationship between cyst size and the degree of malignancy. While ERCP, angiography, and percutaneous needle aspiration may provide additional information, the majority of these examinations were either unhelpful or even misleading.

MCNs of the pancreas are frequently diagnosed and mismanaged as pancreatic pseudocysts with an associated increase in patient morbidity and mortality. Diagnostic imaging can help to distinguish MCNs from pseudocysts when there are features of neoplasia present, however, no imaging investigation can reliably differentiate the two conditions in all cases. If clinical doubt remains, it is preferable to err on the side of safety and either employ a 'wait and watch' strategy or to resect a cystic pancreatic lesion rather than drain a potentially malignant MCN.

Pancreatic cancer represents the fourth leading cause of cancer death in men and the fifth in women. Prognosis remains dismal, mainly because the diagnosis is made late in the clinical course of the disease. The need to improve the diagnosis, detection, and treatment of pancreatic cancer is great. It is in this type of cancer, in which the mortality is so great and the clinical detection so difficult that the recent advances of molecular biology may have a significant impact. Genetic alterations can be detected at different levels. These alterations include oncogene mutations (most commonly, K-ras mutations, which occur in 75% to more than 95% of pancreatic cancer tissues), tumour suppressor genes alterations (mainly, p53, p16, DCC, etc.), overexpression of growth factors (such as EGF, TGF alpha, TGF beta 1-3, aFGF, bTGF, etc.) and their receptors (i.e., EGF receptor, TGF beta receptor I-III, etc.). Insights into the molecular genetics of pancreatic carcinogenesis are beginning to form a genetic model for pancreatic cancer and its precursors. These improvements in our understanding of the molecular biology of pancreatic cancer are not simply of research interest, but may have clinical implications, such as risk assessment, early diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis evaluation.

To evaluate the accuracy and use of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology for the diagnosis of renal masses because with the improved quality and increasing use of ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT), asymptomatic renal masses, particularly small (< 5 cm) tumours, are being discovered more frequently.

Between 1995 and 1997, 49 patients (mean age 67.5 years, range 42-88, 34 men and 14 women) underwent FNA of a solid or complex cystic mass under radiological guidance. All masses were further evaluated and staged by CT. Solid masses were divided according to size (< 5 cm and >/= 5 cm). Patients were followed up to the determination of a final diagnosis on tissue histology, after nephrectomy where possible.

Thirty-six patients had histologically confirmed carcinoma at nephrectomy, and nine had presumed carcinoma (four unfit for surgery, five with advanced malignancy). The remaining four patients had benign diagnoses. FNA produced insufficient sample in eight cases (16%). The sensitivity was 89% for large (>/= 5 cm) solid masses, 64% for small (< 5 cm) solid masses and 50% for complex cysts.

FNA does not contribute to the diagnosis of malignancy in large (> 5 cm) masses, as good radiological imaging is nearly always diagnostic. For smaller (< 5 cm) masses and complex cysts, FNA can occasionally confirm malignancy, but lack of diagnostic yield and low sensitivity means that FNA is unreliable as a diagnostic tool and will rarely help in the routine management of these patients.

Percutaneous needle biopsies are frequently used to evaluate focal lesions of the liver. Needle-tract implantation of hepatocellular cancer has been described in case reports, but the true risk for this problem has not been clearly defined. We retrospectively reviewed 91 cases of hepatocellular cancer during a 4-year period from 1994 to 1997. Data on diagnostic studies, therapy, and outcome were noted. Of 91 patients with hepatocellular cancer, 59 patients underwent percutaneous needle biopsy as part of their diagnostic workup for a liver mass. Three patients (5.1%) were identified with needle-tract implantation of tumor. Two patients required en bloc chest wall resections for implantation of hepatocellular cancer in the soft tissues and rib area. The third patient, who also received percutaneous ethanol injection of his tumor, required a thoracotomy and lung resection for implanted hepatocellular cancer. Percutaneous needle biopsy of suspicious hepatic lesions should not be performed indiscriminately because there is a significant risk for needle-tract implantation. These biopsies should be reserved for those lesions in which no definitive surgical intervention is planned and pathological confirmation is necessary for a nonsurgical therapy.

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is generally considered as a risk factor for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC). However, the cumulative risk differs among the epidemiological studies. In the individual patient, the differential diagnosis between PAC and CP cannot be always resolved preoperatively and even intraoperatively. In those cases, the uncertainty can only be answered with histological studies of the resected specimen after a radical resection, provided that this type of surgery can be performed with a reasonable risk in a surgically fit patient. The type of resection depends on the location of the suspicious mass. For masses in the tail of the pancreas, a distal pancreatectomy is the procedure of choice. For suspicious lesions in the head of the pancreas, a pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) should be performed. The surgeon and the patient should also acknowledge that a radical resection will occasionally be performed for a suspected malignancy only to find that another etiology (i.e. CP) accounts for the suspicious pancreatic mass. In the presence of a strong suspicion for an underlying malignancy in a patient with head dominant CP, PD should probably be preferred over the newer organ-preserving Beger and Frey procedures, since it is an adequate procedure for both CP and PAC.

Peritoneal cytology is clinically useful in gastric and gynecologic malignancies. Its role in pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains less well defined. Controversy exists as to the relationship between percutaneous fine needle aspiration (FNA) of the pancreas and shedding of malignant cells with the peritoneum. The aim of this study was to determine whether positive peritoneal cytology (PPC) predicts unresectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and impacts on overall survival. In addition, the study aimed to determine whether antecedent FNA increases the incidence of PPC.

Between January 1993 and June 1996, 228 patients with radiographically resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent laparoscopic staging. Specimens were taken from right and left upper quadrants at the beginning of laparoscopy. Various prognostic factors were analyzed.

PPC was identified in 34 patients (15%). Of patients that had an antecedent FNA, 20% had PPC, and 13% of those without an antecedent FNA had PPC (p = 0.22). The majority of patients with PPC had stage IV disease (26 of 34 [76%]) and only 8 (24%) had no evidence of metastases. Overall survival was significantly higher in patients with negative peritoneal cytology (NPC) compared with PPC (p<0.0006). PPC had a positive predictive value of 94.1%, specificity of 98.1%, and a sensitivity of 25.6% for determining unresectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PPC was not an independent prognostic variable for survival on multivariate analysis.

PPC is associated with advanced disease and is highly specific in predicting unresectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, resulting in decreased survival. Antecedent FNA is not associated with an increased the incidence of PPC, nor does it significantly impact on overall survival.

The aim of this study was to investigate the results of ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy of pancreatic masses in a large multicenter series.

This study collected the data of 510 patients who had a final diagnosis available and who had undergone ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy of the pancreas. Retrieval rate, sensitivity, specificity, and overall diagnostic accuracy of the whole series, by three different bioptic procedures (cytology, histology, and cytology plus histology) were evaluated. The reliability of ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy to allow a correct diagnosis in the different pancreatic pathologies was calculated. Finally, any complications were collected.

For cytology, histology, and cytology plus histology, retrieval rate values were: 94%, 96%, and 97%; sensitivity was: 87%, 94%, and 94%, specificity: 100%; and diagnostic accuracy: 91%, 90%, and 95%, respectively. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy correctly diagnosed all the cases of pancreatic metastases or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (23 of 510 cases as 5%; in eight of 23 it led to the first diagnosis of the primary tumor) and all the cases of abscesses, 97% of the cases of pseudocysts, 86% of pancreatic adenocarcinomas, 62% of cystic neoplasms, 35% of the cases of chronic pancreatitis (in this case, the bioptic procedures were reviewed), and 33% of neuroendocrine tumors. There were complications in one case of asymptomatic peripancreatic hematoma, three cases of vaso-vagal reactions, and 21 cases of pain.

Ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy of the pancreas is efficacious, without any difference between the various bioptic modalities (with the exception of chronic pancreatitis, in which histology is better). The technique is safe. Moreover, the procedure allows the identification of patients affected by pancreatic tumors other than adenocarcinoma (in our survey 5% of the total); in about one third of these patients it leads to the diagnosis of the primary tumor, thus avoiding inappropriate treatments.