The onset of decompensation in advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) is a hallmark in natural history, with a poor prognosis and a significantly increased liver-related mortality. Etiological treatments for viral hepatitis or abstinence in cirrhosis due to alcohol abuse have demonstrated that some patients experience partial to complete clinical and analytical improvement, a stage termed "recompensation." Although recompensation is primarily defined clinically based on treatable etiologies, it is still evolving for conditions like metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Despite the need for specific biomarkers in hepatic recompensation, no biomarkers have been thoroughly studied in this context. Biomarkers identified in compensated ACLD (cACLD) following etiological treatment might be explored for recompensation. Although the pathophysiology mechanisms underlying the hepatic recompensation remain unclear, understanding the mechanism involved in cirrhosis decompensation could help identify potential targets for recompensation. This review provides an update on the hepatic recompensation concept, examines the existing data on invasive and non-invasive biomarkers, mainly in cACLD after cure, that could be raised in recompensation, and explores future therapeutic targets for the hepatic recompensation process.

Two main stages are differentiated in patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD), one compensated (cACLD) with an excellent prognosis, and the other decompensated (dACLD), defined by the appearance of complications (ascites, variceal bleeding and hepatic encephalopathy) and associated with high mortality. Preventing the progression to dACLD might dramatically improve prognosis and reduce the burden of care associated with ACLD. Portal hypertension is a major driver of the transition from cACLD to dACLD, and a portal pressure of ≥10 mmHg defines clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) as the threshold from which decompensating events may occur. In recent years, innovative studies have provided evidence supporting new strategies to prevent decompensation in cACLD. These studies have yielded major advances, including the development of noninvasive tests (NITs) to identify patients with CSPH with reasonable confidence, the demonstration that aetiological therapies can prevent disease progression and even achieve regression of cirrhosis, and the finding that non-selective β-blockers can effectively prevent decompensation in patients with cACLD and CSPH, mainly by reducing the risk of ascites, the most frequent decompensating event. Here, we review the evidence supporting new strategies to manage cACLD to prevent decompensation and the caveats for their implementation, from patient selection using NITs to ancillary therapies.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has emerged as a significant hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome, with its prevalence increasing globally alongside the epidemics of obesity and diabetes. MAFLD represents a continuum of liver damage, spanning from uncomplicated steatosis to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). This condition can advance to more severe outcomes, including fibrosis and cirrhosis. Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) are a family of four receptor tyrosine kinases (FGFR1-4) that interact with both paracrine and endocrine fibroblast growth factors (FGFs). This interaction activates the phosphorylation of tyrosine kinase residues, thereby triggering downstream signaling pathways, including RAS-MAPK, JAK-STAT, PI3K-AKT, and PLCγ. In the context of MAFLD, paracrine FGF-FGFR signaling is predominantly biased toward the development of liver fibrosis and carcinogenesis. In contrast, endocrine FGF-FGFR signaling is primarily biased toward regulating the metabolism of bile acids, carbohydrates, lipids, and phosphate, as well as maintaining the overall balance of energy metabolism in the body. The interplay between these biased signaling pathways significantly influences the progression of MAFLD. This review explores the critical functions of FGFR signaling in MAFLD from three perspectives: first, it examines the primary roles of FGFRs relative to their structure; second, it summarizes FGFR signaling in hepatic lipid metabolism, elucidating mechanisms underlying the occurrence and progression of MAFLD; finally, it highlights recent advancements in drug development aimed at targeting FGFR signaling for the treatment of MAFLD and its associated diseases.

There are no useful treatments to prevent the development of severe complications of liver cirrhosis. Simvastatin and rifaximin have shown beneficial effects in liver cirrhosis.

To assess whether simvastatin combined with rifaximin improves outcomes in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial conducted among patients with decompensated cirrhosis in 14 European hospitals between January 2019 and December 2022. The last date of follow-up was December 2022.

Patients were randomly assigned to receive simvastatin, 20 mg/d, plus rifaximin, 1200 mg/d (n = 117), or identical-appearing placebo (n = 120) for 12 months in addition to standard therapy, stratified according to Child-Pugh class B or C.

The primary end point was incidence of severe complications of liver cirrhosis associated with organ failure meeting criteria for acute-on-chronic liver failure. Secondary outcomes included transplant or death and a composite end point of complications of cirrhosis (ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, variceal bleeding, acute kidney injury, and infection).

Among the 237 participants randomized (Child-Pugh class B: n = 194; Child-Pugh class C: n = 43), 72% were male and the mean age was 57 years. There were no differences between the 2 groups in terms of development of acute-on-chronic liver failure (21 [17.9%] vs 17 [14.2%] patients in the treatment and placebo groups, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.65-2.34; P = .52); transplant or death (22 [18.8%] vs 29 [24.2%] patients in the treatment and placebo groups, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.43-1.32; P = .32); or development of complications of cirrhosis (50 [42.7%] vs 55 [45.8%] patients in the treatment and placebo groups, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.63-1.36; P = .70). Incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups (426 vs 419; P = .59), but 3 patients in the treatment group (2.6%) developed rhabdomyolysis.

The addition of simvastatin plus rifaximin to standard therapy does not improve outcomes in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03780673.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is considered a life-saving treatment for end-stage renal disease. However, prolonged PD use can lead to the development of peritoneal fibrosis (PF), diminishing its efficacy. Peritoneal mesothelial cells (PMCs) are key initiators of PF when they become damaged. Exposure to high glucose‑based peritoneal dialysis fluids (PDFs) contributes to PF development by directly affecting highly metabolically active PMCs. Recent research indicates that PMCs undergo metabolic reprogramming when exposed to high-glucose PDFs, including enhanced glycolysis, impaired oxidative phosphorylation, abnormal lipid metabolism, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Although this metabolic transition temporarily compensates for the cellular damage and maintains energy levels, its long-term impact on peritoneal tissue is concerning. Multiple studies have identified a close association between this shift in energy metabolism and PF, and may promote the progression of PF through various molecular mechanisms. This review explores recent findings regarding the role and mechanism of PMC metabolic reprogramming in PF progression. Moreover, it provides a summary of potential therapeutic strategies aimed at various metabolic processes, including glucose metabolism, lipid metabolism, and mitochondrial function. The review establishes that targeting metabolic reprogramming in PMCs may be a novel strategy for preventing and treating PD-associated fibrosis.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is the leading chronic liver disease worldwide, with alarming prevalence reaching epidemic proportions.

The objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive review of the latest blood proteomics studies on MASLD and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), with emphasis on fibrosis. Furthermore, our objective is to conduct an analysis of protein pathways and interactions by integrating proteomics data using functional enrichment analysis of the deregulated proteins.

Notwithstanding the considerable discrepancies in the methodology and the number of proteins examined in the circulation, the analysis reveals a consistent pattern among the list of proteins that are decreased or increased in the blood of the affected patients. The relevant biological processes (BP) associated with down- and upregulated proteins are high-density lipoprotein remodelling and complement activation, respectively. The protein families identified include not only those expected to be involved in the immune system and cell adhesion and migration but also ligands of glycoproteins expressed in cells that have been subjected to stress and proteins containing the Sushi domain.

The application of cutting-edge methodologies to investigate the blood proteome in MASH is yielding insights that facilitate the elucidation of disease mechanisms and the identification of optimal noninvasive biomarkers. However, several challenges remain to be addressed in future research, including the generalisation of results on a global scale, the optimisation of analytical technologies and the implementation of large longitudinal studies to gain insights into the molecular mechanisms that underpin the development of advanced disease.

The liver sinusoid, mainly composed of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, hepatic macrophages and hepatic stellate cells, shapes the hepatic vasculature and is key to maintaining liver homeostasis and function. During chronic liver disease (CLD), the function of sinusoidal cells is impaired, being directly involved in the progression of liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and main clinical complications including portal hypertension and hepatocellular carcinoma. In addition to their roles in liver diseases pathobiology, sinusoidal cells' paracrine communication or cross-talk is being studied as a mechanism of disease but also as a remarkable target for treatment. The aim of this review is to gather current knowledge of intercellular signalling in the hepatic sinusoid during the progression of liver disease. We summarise studies developed in pre-clinical models of CLD, especially emphasizing those pathways characterized in human-based clinically relevant models. Finally, we describe pharmacological treatments targeting sinusoidal communication as promising options to treat CLD and its clinical complications.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) pose significant risks for liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Daily aspirin and statins could reduce HCC in patients with MAFLD/MASH. We aimed to clarify whether combined aspirin and statins exert a synergistic effect on prevention of cirrhosis and HCC in patients with MAFLD/MASH.

Patients and their clinical data were collected from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), encompassing about 20 million population. A total of 735,574 MAFLD/MASH patients between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2020 were identified. After applying exclusion criteria, 662,004 cases were enrolled, with a follow-up period of 3 years. Propensity score matching was employed for comparative analysis.

Our findings indicate that combined statin and aspirin use significantly reduced the incidence of liver cirrhosis (p < 0.001) compared to statin or aspirin alone, or non-use of both drugs. However, the combined therapy did not confer additional benefits in reducing mortality rates and HCC. Furthermore, statin monotherapy exhibited a more pronounced effect in reducing mortality and HCC compared to aspirin alone or combined therapy.

Our study underscores that statin monotherapy was not inferior to aspirin or aspirin-statin combined therapies in terms of chemoprevention of cirrhosis, HCC, and overall mortality in MAFLD/MASH patients.

Elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Statins are the cornerstone of preventing and treating cardiovascular disease and can reduce LDL cholesterol by more than 60%. Although statins have high tolerability and safety, as the number of users increases, their adverse reactions in the liver, kidneys, skeletal muscles, and their potential to induce diabetes have also received widespread attention.

How to maximize the lipid-lowering effect of statins, reduce the incidence of adverse reactions, promote the rational application of statins in the clinic, and improve the risk-benefit level, in order to benefit more cardiovascular patients and provide reference for the related basic research of statins. Key scientific concepts of review: This article provides a comprehensive review of the clinical manifestations of statin-related adverse reactions (associated myopathy, hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, glycemic effects, central nervous system, hemorrhagic stroke, etc.), risk factors for triggering adverse reactions, statin interactions with other drugs (food), potential etiopathological mechanisms and common interventions in the clinic. Genetic diversity is strongly associated with statin adverse effects, and thus, in the future genetic testing may also be key to mitigating statin adverse effects.

Decompensated cirrhosis has long been considered the irreversible end stage of liver disease, characterised by further decompensating events until death or liver transplantation. However, the observed clinical improvements after effective antiviral treatments for HBV and HCV and after sustained alcohol abstinence have changed this paradigm, leading to the concept of "recompensation" of cirrhosis. Recompensation of cirrhosis was recently defined by Baveno VII as (i) cure of the primary liver disease aetiology; (ii) disappearance of signs of decompensation (ascites, encephalopathy and portal hypertensive bleeding) off therapy; and (iii) stable improvement of liver function tests (bilirubin, international normalised ratio and albumin). Achieving these recompensation criteria is linked to a significant survival benefit. However, apart from aetiological therapies, no interventions/treatments that facilitate recompensation are available, the molecular mechanisms underlying recompensation remain incompletely understood, and early predictors of recompensation are lacking. Moreover, current recompensation criteria are based on expert opinion and may be refined in the future. Herein, we review the available evidence on cirrhosis recompensation, provide guidance on the clinical management of recompensated patients and discuss future challenges related to cirrhosis recompensation.

This study aimed to compare the serum lipid profiles between tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) in the long-term treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We analyzed data from treatment-naïve CHB patients administered with TDF or TAF, collected from electronic medical records between May 2017 and September 2022. Serum lipid indices, including total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and their ratios (TC/HDL, LDL/HDL), were assessed at baseline, and at 48 and 96 weeks. Propensity score matching (PSM) adjusted for baseline differences between groups. From 2344 patients initially screened, 418 were included for the 48-week analysis (265 on TDF, 153 on TAF) and 292 for the 96-week analysis (238 on TDF, 54 on TAF). At 48 weeks, comparing the serum lipid indicators between the pre- and post-treatment, TDF significantly reduced TC and TC/HDL, whereas TAF induced widespread dyslipidemia, characterized by elevated levels of TC, TG, LDL, LDL/HDL, and TC/HDL, and reduced HDL (P < 0.05). After PSM grouping, TAF remained significantly associated with higher TC, TG, LDL, LDL/HDL, and TC/HDL compared to TDF (P < 0.05). Over 48 weeks, TAF treatment was associated with significant increases in TC, TG, and LDL, whereas TDF treatment led to decreases (P < 0.05). TC/HDL and LDL/HDL increased in both groups, but more significant in TAF (P < 0.05). At 96 weeks, the TAF group continued to exhibit significantly higher levels of TC, LDL, and LDL/HDL compared to the TDF group (P < 0.05). Notably, LDL levels were 115.65 ± 28.07 mg/dL in TAF versus 96.07 ± 23.97 mg/dL in TDF. The increase in TC/HDL ratio in the TAF group was higher than in the TDF group, though not statistically significant. Furthermore, TAF treatment was associated with significant increases in LDL (18.58 ± 24.35 mg/dL) and LDL/HDL ratio (0.41 ± 0.95) over 96 weeks, while TDF treatment showed reductions in TC (-8.13 ± 30.86 mg/dL). Between 48 and 96 weeks, most lipid changes in the TDF group were not statistically significant, except for increases in LDL and LDL/HDL. In the TAF group, an increasing trend of LDL and TC/HDL was noted, although LDL showed a slight turnover after 48 weeks. This real-world study provides new evidence that TAF can induce dyslipidemia, while TDF exhibits a lipid-lowering effect in CHB. Patients at high risk for hepatic steatosis and cardiovascular diseases should consider these effects when choosing between TAF and TDF.

Carvedilol is a nonselective β-blocker (NSBB) with anti-α1-adrenergic activity, more effective than traditional NSBBs in reducing portal pressure hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). However, 35%-45% of patients still have insufficient HVPG decrease. Statins ameliorate endothelial dysfunction, reduce hepatic vascular resistance, and have pleiotropic effects. We investigated whether the addition of simvastatin improves the efficacy of carvedilol on HVPG in cirrhosis with severe portal hypertension and suboptimal response to traditional NSBBs.

Patients with cirrhosis and high-risk varices referred for primary prophylaxis were consecutively included. HVPG was measured at baseline and again after i.v. propranolol. Suboptimal responders (HVPG decrease <20%) were treated with carvedilol and were randomized to double-blind administration of placebo or simvastatin. Chronic HVPG response was assessed after 4-6 weeks, repeating HVPG measurements after a standard liquid meal to estimate endothelial dysfunction. Plasma samples were obtained before each study to investigate inflammatory parameters.

Of 184 eligible patients, 82 were randomized to carvedilol + simvastatin (N = 41) or carvedilol + placebo (N = 41). Baseline characteristics were similar. HVPG significantly decreased with both, carvedilol + simvastatin (18.6 ± 4 to 15.7 ± 4 mm Hg, p < 0.001) and carvedilol + placebo (18.9 ± 3 to 16.9 ± 3 mm Hg, p < 0.001). The decrease was greater with carvedilol + simvastatin (2.97 ± 2.5 vs. 2.05 ± 1.6 mm Hg, p = 0.031). An HVPG decrease ≥20% occurred in 37% versus 15% of patients, respectively (OR: 3.37, 95% CI = 1.15-9.85; p = 0.021). With test meal, HVPG increased in both groups ( p < 0.01), although carvedilol + simvastatin attenuated such increment (12 ± 8% vs. 23 ± 16%, p < 0.001). Cytokine levels (Interleukine-6, monocyte-chemoattractant protein-1, and malondialdehyde) decreased significantly more with carvedilol + simvastatin ( p < 0.01). The incidence of adverse events was similar.

In patients with severe portal hypertension (all with high-risk varices) and suboptimal hemodynamic response to traditional NSBBs, combined therapy with carvedilol plus simvastatin significantly enhances the portal pressure reduction achieved with carvedilol monotherapy, improves endothelial dysfunction, and reduces proinflammatory cytokines.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) and herb Induced Liver Injury (HILI) continues to pose a substantial challenge in both clinical practice and drug development, representing a grave threat to patient well-being. This comprehensive review introduces a novel perspective on DILI and HILI by thoroughly exploring the intricate microenvironment of the liver. The dynamic interplay among hepatocytes, sinusoidal endothelial cells, Kupffer cells, hepatic stellate cells, cholangiocytes, and the intricate vascular network assumes a central role in drug metabolism and detoxification. Significantly, this microenvironment is emerging as a critical determinant of susceptibility to DILI and HILI. The review delves into the multifaceted interactions within the liver microenvironment, providing valuable insights into the complex mechanisms that underlie DILI and HILI. Furthermore, we discuss potential strategies for mitigating drug-induced liver injury by targeting these influential factors, emphasizing their clinical relevance. By highlighting recent advances and future prospects, our aim is to shed light on the promising avenue of leveraging the liver microenvironment for the prevention and mitigation of DILI and HILI. This deeper understanding is crucial for advancing clinical practices and ensuring patient safety in the realm of DILI and HILI.

Portal hypertension is the key mechanism driving the transition from compensated to decompensated cirrhosis. In this review, the authors described the pathophysiology of portal hypertension in cirrhosis and the rationale of pharmacologic treatment of portal hypertension. We discussed both etiologic and nonetiologic treatment of portal hypertension and the specific clinical scenarios how nonselective beta-blocker can be used in patients with cirrhosis. Finally, the authors summarized the evidence for emerging alternatives for portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis.

Portal hypertension represents the primary non-neoplastic complication of liver cirrhosis and has life-threatening consequences, such as oesophageal variceal bleeding, ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy. Portal hypertension occurs due to increased resistance of the cirrhotic liver vasculature to portal blood flow and is further aggravated by the hyperdynamic circulatory syndrome. Existing knowledge indicates that the profibrogenic phenotype acquired by sinusoidal cells is the initial factor leading to increased hepatic vascular tone and fibrosis, which cause increased vascular resistance and portal hypertension. Data also suggest that the phenotype of hepatic cells could be further impaired due to the altered mechanical properties of the cirrhotic liver itself, creating a deleterious cycle that worsens portal hypertension in the advanced stages of liver disease. In this Review, we discuss recent discoveries in the pathophysiology and treatment of cirrhotic portal hypertension, a condition with few pharmacological treatment options.

Drug repurposing involves the investigation of existing drugs for new indications. It offers a great opportunity to quickly identify a new drug candidate at a lower cost than novel discovery and development. Despite the importance and potential role of drug repurposing, there is no specific definition that healthcare providers and the World Health Organization credit. Unfortunately, many similar and interchangeable concepts are being used in the literature, making it difficult to collect and analyze uniform data on repurposed drugs. This research was conducted based on understanding general criteria for drug repurposing, concentrating on liver diseases. Many drugs have been investigated for their effect on liver diseases even though they were originally approved (or on their way to being approved) for other diseases. Some of the hypotheses for drug repurposing were first captured from the literature and then processed further to test the hypothesis. Recently, with the revolution in bioinformatics techniques, scientists have started to use drug libraries and computer systems that can analyze hundreds of drugs to give a short list of candidates to be analyzed pharmacologically. However, this study revealed that drug repurposing is a potential aid that may help deal with liver diseases. It provides available or under-investigated drugs that could help treat hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, Wilson disease, liver cancer, and fatty liver. However, many further studies are needed to ensure the efficacy of these drugs on a large scale.

Previous experimental and clinical studies suggested a beneficial effect of statins, metformin, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (RASi) on portal hypertension. Still, their effects on hard cirrhosis-related clinical endpoints, such as variceal bleeding and bleeding-related mortality, remain to be investigated.

Thus, we recorded the use of statins, metformin and RASi in a large cohort of cirrhotic patients undergoing endoscopic band ligation (EBL) for primary (PP, n = 440) and secondary bleeding prophylaxis (SP, n = 480) between 01/2000 and 05/2020. Variceal (re-) bleeding and survival rates were compared between patients with vs. without these co-medications.

A total of 920 cirrhotic patients with varices were included. At first EBL, median MELD was 13 and 515 (56%) patients showed ascites. Statins, metformin and RASi were used by 49 (5.3%), 74 (8%), and 91 (9.9%) patients, respectively. MELD and platelet counts were similar in patients with and without the co-medications of interest. Rates of first variceal bleeding and variceal rebleeding at 2 years were 5.2% and 11.7%, respectively. Neither of the co-medications were associated with decreased first bleeding rates (log-rank tests in PP: statins p = 0.813, metformin p = 0.862, RASi p = 0.919) nor rebleeding rates (log-rank tests in SP: statin p = 0.113, metformin p = 0.348, RASi p = 0.273). Similar mortality rates were documented in patients with and without co-medications for PP (log-rank tests: statins p = 0.630, metformin p = 0.591, RASi p = 0.064) and for SP (statins p = 0.720, metformin p = 0.584, RASi p = 0.118).

In clinical practice, variceal bleeding and mortality rates of cirrhotic patients were not reduced by co-medication with statins, metformin or RASi. Nevertheless, we recommend the use of these co-medications by indication, as they may still exert beneficial effects on non-bleeding complications in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Non-invasive tests to assess the probability of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) - including the ANTICIPATE±NASH models based on liver stiffness measurement and platelet count±BMI, and the von Willebrand factor antigen to platelet count ratio (VITRO) - have fundamentally changed the management of compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). However, their prognostic utility has not been compared head-to-head to the gold standard for prognostication in cACLD, i.e. the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG).

Patients with cACLD (liver stiffness measurement ≥10 kPa) who underwent advanced characterization via same-day HVPG/non-invasive test assessment from 2007-2022 were retrospectively included. Long-term follow-up data on hepatic decompensation was recorded.

Four hundred and twenty patients with cACLD of varying etiologies, with a CSPH prevalence of 67.6%, were included. The cumulative incidence of hepatic decompensation at 1 and 2 years was 4.7% and 8.0%, respectively. HVPG, VITRO, and ANTICIPATE±NASH-CSPH-probability showed similar time-dependent prognostic value (AUROCs 0.683-0.811 at 1 year and 0.699-0.801 at 2 years). In competing risk analyses adjusted for MELD score and albumin, HVPG (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [aSHR] 1.099 [95% CI 1.054-1.150] per mmHg; p <0.001), or VITRO (aSHR 1.134 [95% CI 1.062-1.211] per unit; p <0.001), or ANTICIPATE±NASH-CSPH-probability (aSHR 1.232 [95% CI 1.094-1.387] per 10%; p <0.001) all predicted first decompensation during follow-up. Previously proposed cut-offs (HVPG ≥10 mmHg vs. <10 mmHg, VITRO ≥2.5 vs. <2.5, and ANTICIPATE-CSPH probability ≥60% vs. <60%) all accurately discriminated between patients at negligible risk and those at substantial risk of hepatic decompensation.

The prognostic performance of ANTICIPATE±NASH-CSPH-probability and VITRO is comparable to that of HVPG, supporting their utility for identifying patients who may benefit from medical therapies to prevent first hepatic decompensation.

Non-invasive tests have revolutionized the diagnosis and management of clinically significant portal hypertension in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). However, limited data exists regarding the prognostic utility of non-invasive tests in direct comparison to the gold standard for prognostication in cACLD, i.e. the hepatic venous pressure gradient. In our study including 420 patients with cACLD, the ANTICIPATE±NASH model and VITRO yielded similar AUROCs to hepatic venous pressure gradient for hepatic decompensation within 1 to 2 years. Thus, non-invasive tests should be applied and updated in yearly intervals in clinical routine to identify patients at short-term risk, thereby identifying patients who may benefit from treatment aimed at preventing hepatic decompensation.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the liver component of a cluster of conditions, while its subtype, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), emerges as a potentially progressive liver disorder that harbors the risk of evolving into cirrhosis and culminating in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). NASH and cardiovascular disease (CVD) have common risk factors, but compared to liver-related causes, the most common cause of death in NASH patients is CVD. Within the pharmacological armamentarium, statins, celebrated for their lipid-modulating prowess, have now garnered attention for their expansive therapeutic potential in NASH. Evidence from a plethora of studies suggests that statins not only manifest anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic properties but also impart a multifaceted beneficial impact on hepatic health. In this review, we used "statin", "NAFLD", "NASH", and "CVD" as the major keywords and conducted a literature search using the PubMed and Web of Science databases to determine the safety and efficacy of statins in patients and animals with NASH and NAFLD, and the mechanism of statin therapy for NASH. Simultaneously, we reviewed the important role of the intestinal microbiota in statin therapy for NASH, as it is hoped that statins will provide new insights into modulating the harmful inflammatory microbiota in the gut and reducing systemic inflammation in NASH patients.

Statins have historically been underutilized in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). We sought to investigate the association between CLD and statin prescription in a primary care setting. Our retrospective cohort study identified primary care patients with a low-density lipoprotein value and more than one office visit from 2012 through 2018. Indication for statin therapy was determined using the Third Adult Treatment Panel criteria prior to November 2016 and the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association guidelines thereafter. Indication for statin prescription and statin therapy by year was determined. Patients with CLD were identified using ICD-9/10 diagnosis codes. In total, 2119 individuals with an indication for statin therapy were identified. Of these individuals, 354 (16.7%) had CLD. Alcoholic and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease comprised 44.9% and 28.5% of the CLD population, respectively; 27.7% had cirrhosis. There was no difference in the prevalence of statin prescriptions when comparing patients with a CLD diagnosis to those without one (57.9 vs 59.9%, p = 0.48). A diagnosis of CLD was also not significantly associated with statin prescription when adjusting for other covariates (odds ratio (OR) 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-1.33). An alanine aminotransferase level greater than 45 U/L significantly reduced the odds of a statin prescription (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.44-0.87). Overall, the presence of a CLD diagnosis was not associated with attenuated statin utilization compared to those without a CLD diagnosis. Nevertheless, adherence to guideline indicated statin therapy remains suboptimal and efforts to increase statin utilization in this high-risk population remain prudent.

Patho-physiological changes in liver cirrhosis create portacaval shunts that allow blood flow to bypass the hepatic portal vein into the systemic circulation affecting drug pharmacokinetics (PKs). The objectives of this work were to implement a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) framework describing shunted blood flows in virtual patients with differing degrees of liver cirrhosis; and to assess the minimal and full PBPK model's performance using drugs with intermediate to high hepatic extraction. Single dose concentration-time profiles and PK parameters for oral ibrutinib, midazolam, propranolol, and buspirone were simulated in healthy volunteers (HVs) and subjects with cirrhosis (Child-Pugh severity score (CP-A, CP-B, or CP-C)). Model performance was verified by comparing predicted to observed fold-changes in PK parameters between HVs and cirrhotic subjects. The verified model was used to simulate the PK changes for simvastatin in patients with cirrhosis. The predicted area under the curve ratios (AUCCirr :AUCHV ) for ibrutinib were 3.38, 6.87, and 11.46 using the minimal PBPK model with shunt and 1.61, 2.58, and 4.33 without the shunt, these compared with observed values of 4.33, 8.14, and 9.04, respectively. For ibrutinib, propranolol, and buspirone, including a shunt in the PBPK model improved the prediction of the AUCCirr :AUCHV and maximum plasma concentration ratios (CmaxCirr :CmaxHV ). For midazolam, an intermediate extraction drug, the differences were less clear. Simulated simvastatin dose adjustments in cirrhosis suggested that 20 mg in CP-A and 10 mg in CP-B could be used clinically. A mechanistic model-informed understanding of the anatomic and pathophysiology of cirrhosis will facilitate improved dose prediction and adjustment in this vulnerable population.

In recent years, studies have demonstrated the benefits of statins in a range of chronic diseases separate from cardiovascular outcomes. Early studies in the context of chronic liver disease have suggested favorable effects of statins leading to slowed fibrosis progression, reduced portal pressures, decreased rates of hepatic decompensation, and improved survival. This has increased interest in the potential role that statins may have in the management of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis, though many questions remain unanswered, including concerns regarding the safety of higher dose statins in patients with advanced decompensated cirrhosis. In this review, we provide an update on the current literature addressing the use of statins in patients with cirrhosis and highlight areas in which additional studies are needed.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is an orphan, cholestatic liver disease that is characterized by inflammatory biliary strictures with variable progression to end-stage liver disease. Its pathophysiology is poorly understood. Chronic biliary inflammation is likely driven by immune dysregulation, gut dysbiosis, and environmental exposures resulting in gut-liver crosstalk and bile acid metabolism disturbances. There is no proven medical therapy that alters disease progression in PSC, with the commonly prescribed ursodeoxycholic acid being shown to improve liver biochemistry at low-moderate doses (15-23 mg/kg/day) but not alter transplant-free survival or liver-related outcomes. Liver transplantation is the only option for patients who develop end-stage liver disease or refractory complications of PSC. Immunosuppressive and antifibrotic agents have not proven to be effective, but there is promise for manipulation of the gut microbiome with fecal microbiota transplantation and antibiotics. Bile acid manipulation via alternate synthetic bile acids such as norursodeoxycholic acid, or interaction at a transcriptional level via nuclear receptor agonists and fibrates have shown potential in phase II trials in PSC with several leading to larger phase III trials. In view of the enhanced malignancy risk, statins, and aspirin show potential for reducing the risk of colorectal cancer and cholangiocarcinoma in PSC patients. For patients who develop clinically relevant strictures with cholestatic symptoms and worsening liver function, balloon dilatation is safer compared with biliary stent insertion with equivalent clinical efficacy.

Statins, which are inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, are an effective pharmacological tool for lowering blood cholesterol levels. This property makes statins one of the most popular drugs used primarily to prevent cardiovascular diseases, where hyperlipidemia is a significant risk factor that increases mortality. Nevertheless, studies conducted mainly in the last decade have shown that statins might prevent and treat liver cancer, one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. This narrative review summarizes the scientific achievements to date regarding the role of statins in liver tumors. Molecular biology tools have revealed that cell growth and proliferation can be inhibited by statins, which further inhibit angiogenesis. Clinical studies, supported by meta-analysis, confirm that statins are highly effective in preventing and treating hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. However, this effect may depend on the statin's type and dose, and more clinical trials are required to evaluate clinical effects. Moreover, their potential hepatotoxicity is a significant caveat for using statins in clinical practice. Nevertheless, this group of drugs, initially developed to prevent cardiovascular diseases, is now a key candidate in hepato-oncology patient management. The description of new drug-statin-like structures, e.g., with low toxicity to liver cells, may bring another clinically significant improvement to current cancer therapies.

Hepatocellular carcinoma has a substantial global mortality burden which is rising despite advancements in tackling the traditional viral risk factors. Metabolic (dysfunction) associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is the most prevalent liver disease, increasing in parallel with the epidemics of obesity, diabetes and systemic metabolic dysregulation. MAFLD is a major factor behind this sustained rise in HCC incidence, both as a single disease entity and often via synergistic interactions with other liver diseases. Mechanisms behind MAFLD-related HCC are complex but is crucially underpinned by systemic metabolic dysregulation with variable contributions from interacting disease modifiers related to environment, genetics, dysbiosis and immune dysregulation. MAFLD-related HCC has a distinct clinical presentation, most notably its common occurrence in non-cirrhotic liver disease. This is just one of several major challenges to effective surveillance programmes. The response of MAFLD-related HCC to immune-checkpoint therapy is currently controversial, and is further complicated by the high prevalence of MAFLD in individuals with HCC from viral aetiologies. In this review, we highlight the current data on epidemiology, clinical characteristics, outcomes and screening controversies. In addition, concepts that have arisen because of the MAFLD paradigm such as HCC in MAFLD/NAFLD non-overlapping groups, dual aetiology tumours and MAFLD sub-phenotypes is reviewed.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome and poses a significant threat to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and metabolic dysregulation. Statins exert anti-inflammatory, antioxidative and antithrombotic effects that target mechanisms underlying NAFLD. However, the protective effects of the different doses, intensities and types of statins on the incidence of NAFLD-related decompensated liver cirrhosis (DLC) in patients with T2DM remain unclear.

This study used the data of patients with T2DM who were non-HBV and non-HCV carriers from a national population database to examine the protective effects of statin use on DLC incidence through propensity score matching. The incidence rate (IR) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of DLC in patients with T2DM with or without statin use were calculated.

A higher cumulative dose and specific types of statins, namely rosuvastatin, pravastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin and fluvastatin, reduced the risk of DLC in patients with T2DM. Statin use was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of DLC (HR: .65, 95% CI: .61-.70). The optimal daily intensity of statin use with the lowest risk of DLC was .88 defined daily dose (DDD).

The results revealed the protective effects of specific types of statins on DLC risk in patients with T2DM and indicated a dose-response relationship. Additional studies are warranted to understand the specific mechanisms of action of different types of statins and their effect on DLC risk in patients with T2DM.

β-blockers reduce hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) by decreasing portal inflow, with no reduction in intrahepatic vascular resistance. 5-Methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) can prevent oxidative loss of tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), a cofactor for endothelial nitric oxide synthase coupling. It also converts homocysteine (tHcy) into methionine and enables the degradation of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), an inhibitor of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 5-MTHF in combination with propranolol on HVPG and nitric oxide bioavailability markers in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

Sixty patients with cirrhosis and HVPG ≥12 mmHg were randomized 1:1 to receive treatment with 5-MTHF+propranolol or placebo+propranolol for 90 days under double-blind conditions. HVPG and markers of nitric oxide bioavailability (BH4, ADMA and tHcy) were measured again at the end of treatment.

Groups were similar in terms of baseline clinical and hemodynamic data and nitric oxide bioavailability markers. HVPG decreased in both groups, but the magnitude of the change was significantly greater in the group treated with 5-MTHF+propranolol compared to placebo+propranolol (percentage decrease, 20 [29-9] vs. 12.5 [22-0], p = 0.028), without differences in hepatic blood flow. At the end of treatment, 5-MTHF+propranolol (vs. placebo+propranolol) was associated with higher BH4 (1,101.4 ± 1,413.3 vs. 517.1 ± 242.8 pg/ml, p <0.001), lower ADMA (109.3 ± 52.7 vs. 139.9 ± 46.7 μmol/L, p = 0.027) and lower tHcy (μmol/L, 11.0 ± 4.6 vs. 15.4 ± 7.2 μmol/L, p = 0.010) plasma levels.

In patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, 5-MTHF administration significantly enhanced the HVPG reduction achieved with propranolol. This effect appears to be mediated by improved nitric oxide bioavailability in the hepatic microcirculation.

2014-002018-21.

Currently, the pharmacological prevention of cirrhosis complications due to portal hypertension, such as esophageal varices rupture, is based on the use of β-blockers, but some patients still present with acute variceal bleeding, mainly due to an insufficient reduction of portal pressure. In this study, we sought to demonstrate that the addition of folic acid to β-blockers is more effective in reducing portal pressure than β-blockers alone. This finding could represent the basis for validation studies in larger cohorts, which could impact the future prophylactic management of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. Enhancing the benefit of β-blockers with a safe, accessible, cost-effective drug could improve clinical outcomes in cirrhosis, which in turn could translate into a reduction in the rates and costs of hospitalization, and ultimately into improved survival.

Compensated liver cirrhosis (CLC) is defined as cirrhosis with one or more decompensating events, such as ascites, variceal haemorrhage, or hepatic encephalopathy. Patients with CLC are largely asymptomatic with preserved hepatic function. The transition from CLC to decompensated cirrhosis occurs as a result of a complex interaction between multiple predisposing and precipitating factors. The first decompensation event in CLC patients is considered a significant turning point in the progression of cirrhosis, as it signals a drastic decline in median survival rates from 10-12 years to only 1-2 years. Furthermore, early cirrhosis has the potential to regress as liver fibrosis is a dynamic condition. With the advent of effective non-invasive tools for detecting hepatic fibrosis, more and more patients with CLC are currently being recognised. This offers clinicians a unique opportunity to properly manage such patients in order to achieve cirrhosis regression or, at the very least, prevent its progression. There are numerous emerging approaches for preventing or delaying decompensation in CLC patients. A growing body of evidence indicates that treating the underlying cause can lead to cirrhosis regression, and the use of non-selective beta-blockers can prevent decompensation by lowering portal hypertension. Additionally, addressing various cofactors (such as obesity, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, and alcoholism) and precipitating factors (such as infection, viral hepatitis, and hepatotoxic drugs) that have a detrimental impact on the natural course of cirrhosis may benefit patients with CLC. However, high-quality data must be generated through well-designed and adequately powered randomised clinical trials to validate these disease-modifying techniques for CLC patients. This article discussed the natural history of CLC, risk factors for its progression, and therapeutic approaches that could alter the trajectory of CLC evolution and improve outcomes.

Imbalance in the tissue microenvironment is the main obstacle to drug delivery and distribution in the human body. Before penetrating the pathological tissue microenvironment to the target site, therapeutic agents are usually accompanied by three consumption steps: the first step is tissue physical barriers for prevention of their penetration, the second step is inactivation of them by biological molecules, and the third step is a cytoprotective mechanism for preventing them from functioning on specific subcellular organelles. However, recent studies in drug-hindering mainly focus on normal physiological rather than pathological microenvironment, and the repair of damaged physiological barriers is also rarely discussed. Actually, both the modulation of pathological barriers and the repair of damaged physiological barriers are essential in the disease treatment and the homeostasis maintenance. In this review, we present an overview describing the latest advances in the generality of these pathological barriers and barrier-modulated nanomedicine. Overall, this review holds considerable significance for guiding the design of nanomedicine to increase drug efficacy in the future.

Liver transplantation (LT) is the definitive therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease, acute liver failure, acute-on-chronic liver failure, hepatocellular carcinoma, and metabolic liver diseases. The acceptance of LT in Asia has been gradually increasing and so is the expertise to perform LT. Preparing a patient with cirrhosis for LT is the most important aspect of a successful LT. The preparation for LT begins with the first index decompensation for a patient with cirrhosis. Patients planned for LT should undergo a thorough screening for infections, and a complete cardiac, pulmonology, and psychosocial evaluation pre-LT. In this review, we discuss the indications and contraindications of LT and the evaluation and assessment of patients with liver disease planned for LT.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a syndrome characterized by acute and severe decompensation of chronic liver disease (CLD) correlated with multiple organ failure, poor prognosis, and increased mortality. In 40-50% of ACLF cases, the trigger is not recognized; for many of these patients, bacterial translocation associated with systemic inflammation is thought to be the determining factor; in the other 50% of patients, sepsis, alcohol consumption, and reactivation of chronic viral hepatitis are the most frequently described trigger factors. Other conditions considered precipitating factors are less common, including acute alcoholic hepatitis, major surgery, TIPS insertion, or inadequate paracentesis without albumin substitution. Host response is likely the primary factor predicting ACLF severity and prognosis, the host immune response having a particular significance in this syndrome, together with the inflammatory cascade. The management of ACLF includes both the prevention of the precipitating factors that lead to acute liver decompensation and the support of vital functions, the prevention and management of complications, the estimation of prognosis, and the opportunity for liver transplantation.

The Billroth IV consensus was developed during a consensus meeting of the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (ÖGGH) and the Austrian Society of Interventional Radiology (ÖGIR) held on the 26th of November 2022 in Vienna.Based on international recommendations and considering recent landmark studies, the Billroth IV consensus provides guidance regarding the diagnosis and management of portal hypertension in advanced chronic liver disease.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) carries a high short-term mortality for patients with cirrhosis. Prior literature suggests that statin exposure may reduce the likelihood of ACLF events. However, it is unclear if statin exposure is associated with ACLF-related mortality. This study sought to determine the association between statin use and short-term mortality among patients hospitalised with ACLF.

This was a retrospective cohort study of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) patients diagnosed with cirrhosis between 2008 and 2021 and hospitalised with high-grade (2 or 3) ACLF. Patients were stratified into those with and without continuous statin exposure for at least 90 days prior to hospitalisation. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to determine the adjusted association between statin exposure and 28-day and 90-day mortality. Categorical statin dose exposure, converted to simvastatin equivalents, was also explored.

A total of 11,731 patients with cirrhosis hospitalised with Grade 2 or 3 ACLF were included in the analytic cohort, 26% of whom had statin exposure. In adjusted logistic regression models, statin use was associated with 18% lower odds of ACLF-related 28-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.73-0.93, p = 0.001) and 24% lower odds of 90-day mortality (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.68-0.86, p <0.001). Increasing statin dose exposure was also associated with further reductions in 90-day mortality (e.g. OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.93 for 10-40 mg vs. 0 mg and OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.87 for 80 mg vs. 0 mg, p <0.001).

In this large, retrospective cohort study, statin exposure before high-grade ACLF hospitalisation was associated with reduced odds of 28-day and 90-day mortality in patients with cirrhosis. A statin dose-dependent reduction in 90-day ACLF-related mortality was also observed.

Statins have been identified as a class of medications with potential beneficial effects for patients with cirrhosis. In this large, retrospective cohort study of patients with cirrhosis who seek care at the Veterans Health Administration, statin use was associated with a decrease in short term (28-day and 90-day) mortality as a result of acute-on-chronic liver failure. Future prospective studies are needed to further clarify the relative safety and efficacy of statin therapy in reducing morbidity and mortality associated with acute-on-chronic liver failure in patients with cirrhosis.

This study aims to explore the effect of liver stem cells (LSCs)-derived exosomes and the miR-142a-5p carried by them on the process of fibrosis by regulating macrophages polarization.

In this study, CCL₄ was used to establish liver fibrosis model. The morphology and purity of exosomes (EVs) were verified by transmission electron microscopy, western blotting (WB) and nanoparticle tracing analysis (NTA). Real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR), WB and enzyme-linked immunoadsorption (ELISA) were used to detect liver fibrosis markers, macrophage polarization markers and liver injury markers. Histopathological assays were used to verify the liver injury morphology in different groups. The cell co-culture model and liver fibrosis model were constructed to verify the expression of miR-142a-5p and ctsb.

Immunofluorescence of LSCs markers CK-18, epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCam), and AFP showed that these markers were up-regulated in LSCs. In addition, we evaluated the ability of LSCs to excrete EVs by labeling LSCs-EVs with PKH67. We found that CCL₄ and EVs were simultaneously treated at 50 and 100 μg doses, and both doses of EVs could reduce the degree of liver fibrosis in mice. We tested markers of M1 or M2 macrophage polarization and found that EVs reduced M1 marker expression and promoted M2 marker expression. Further, ELISA was used to detect the secreted factors related to M1 and M2 in tissue lysates, which also verified the above views. Further analysis showed that the expression of miR-142a-5p increased significantly with the increase of EVs treatment concentration and time. Further, in vitro and in vivo LSCs-EVs regulate macrophage polarization through miR-142a-5p/ctsb pathway and affect the process of liver fibrosis.

Our data suggest that EVs-derived miR-142-5p from LSCs improves the progression of liver fibrosis by regulating macrophage polarization through ctsb.

Atorvastatin is a commonly used statin for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia in people at high risk for coronary, cerebrovascular, and peripheral artery disease. However, fatal liver failure due to atorvastatin treatment has been rarely reported, especially during the very short incubation period.

A 63-year-old male patient was admitted due to unexplained chest pain. After admission, his liver function had decreased < 24 hours after taking 20 mg tablets of atorvastatin due to lacunar infarction, which was improved after drug withdrawal. The treatment regimen was restarted 15 days later, but within 16 hours, the patient developed multiple organ failure, including liver failure and renal failure.

The pathological results after 7 days indicated focal inflammatory necrosis, virus and autoimmune correlation tests were negative, which did not rule out drug-induced liver injury. Interventions: receiving artificial liver therapy, continuous renal replacement therapy and other organ support treatment.

The patient died 18 days after admission.

Statin idiosyncratic liver injury is very rare, but the consequences can be serious.

In this editorial, we briefly mention the studies that support the use of statins to change the natural history of liver cirrhosis, alongside potential biases and flaws that need to be considered when analyzing data. The key message that we want to communicate is that even if current evidence is somehow compelling, it is limited, mostly from observational studies, and in general not enough to formally recommend the prescription of statins in patients with cirrhosis as disease-modifying agents. Finally, we also mention some important facts about the safety of statins in the context of patients with underlying liver disease.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents 90% of liver tumors. Statins may reduce HCC incidence. Its antitumor activities may be mediated by disrupting several hepatocarcinogenic pathways. To evaluate in vivo and in vitro the antiproliferative and antiangiogenic action of atorvastatin (AT) in the development of HCC as well as its mechanisms of action. In vivo model: hexachlorobenzene (HCB) was used to promote the development of HCC in Balb/C nude mice. Number of hepatic tumor, liver cell proliferation parameters (proliferating cell nuclear antigen, PCNA), angiogenesis, and VEGF levels were analyzed. In vitro model: Hep-G2 and Ea-hy926 cells were used to evaluate the effect of different doses of AT on HCB induced cell proliferation, migration, and vasculogenesis and to analyze proliferative parameters. In vivo: AT prevented liver growth and tumor development and inhibited PCNA, TGF-β1, and pERK levels increase. AT prevented skin blood vessel formation. In vitro, AT prevented cell proliferation and migration as well as tubular formation in the endothelial cell line by inhibiting the MAPK ERK pathway. We were able to demonstrate the potential AT antiproliferative and antiangiogenic effects in an HCC model and the involvement of TGF-β1 and pERK pathways.

Hypertrophic scars (HTS) result from injury to the skin and represent a clinical burden with limited treatment options. Previously, we demonstrated that statin drugs could attenuate HTS formation, but convenient topical delivery and retention of these drugs at the wound site remains a challenge.

Here, we aimed to develop a topical cream formulation that can deliver statin drugs simply and conveniently to reduce scar hypertrophy.

We formulated creams containing 10% pravastatin, 2% simvastatin, and 10% simvastatin. We tested these creams for their ability to reduce scar hypertrophy and attenuate dermal fibrosis in a clinically relevant HTS wound model performed in rabbit ear skin. We also monitored trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL) over the course of wound healing in order to understand the effects of statin treatment on epidermal barrier recovery.

Of the three creams formulated, only application of 10% simvastatin cream significantly attenuated hypertrophy of resultant scars compared with vehicle cream application. Application of 10% simvastatin cream resulted in a decrease in macrophage and myofibroblast density at post-operative day 28 (POD28) harvest. Application of 10% simvastatin cream resulted in visible symptoms of dryness and increased TEWL at POD28, but subsequent withdrawal of statin cream treatment resulted in rapid alleviation of dryness and decrease in TEWL back to normal levels.

Our data demonstrate that topical administration of 10% simvastatin cream antagonizes dermal fibrosis and reduces hypertrophy in an HTS model, and withdrawal of the cream enables recovery of epidermal barrier and resolution of skin dryness.