Background: Defecation status is an important determinant of quality of life. Previous studies showed that postoperative defecation disorders occurred after open surgery for ulcerative colitis (UC), but few have investigated defecation status after laparo-assisted surgery. The added precision and magnification provided with laparo-assisted surgery should lead to less damage to the anal sphincter muscle. This study investigated defecation function after a laparo-assisted restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). We also clarified factors that worsened defecation status. Methods: This retrospective study included 57 patients who underwent laparo-assisted RPC with IPAA for UC from January 2000 to May 2019. At 1 year after surgery, functional outcomes were evaluated with the Kirwan classification and Wexner score. Risk factors for poor defecation status were investigated with multiple regression. Results: At 1 year after surgery, the median Kirwan classification score was 2 and the median Wexner score was 8. Defecation disorder was observed in 19 (33.3%) patients, according to the Kirwan classification, and 15 (26.3%) patients, according to the Wexner score. Hand-sewn IPAA was associated with defecation disorder (P = .04), evaluated with the Kirwan classification. Hand-sewn IPAA (P = .01), older age (P = .03), high body mass index (P = .04), and the surgical indication (cancer/dysplasia; P = .03) were significantly associated with defecation disorder, evaluated with the Wexner score. The multivariable analysis showed that hand-sewn IPAA was an independent risk factor (P = .049; odds ratio: 4.99; 95% confidence interval: 1.0-28.39). Conclusions: We found that hand-sewn IPAA was a risk factor for defecation disorders after laparo-assisted RPC for UC.

There is limited knowledge on ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) function when performed on patients older than age 50 years. The aim of this study was to determine if surgery on those older than age 50 years impacts short-term complications or long-term function.

A retrospective review of all patients undergoing IPAA for chronic ulcerative colitis at a single tertiary referral center between 2002 and 2013 was conducted. Short-term postoperative complications and long-term function and quality of life were analyzed according to age at pouch formation (age >50 vs age ≤50 years).

A total of 911 patients who underwent IPAA (542 male) were included, with 178 patients (20%) age >50 years and 733 (80%) ≤50 years. Patients >50 years had higher American Society of Anesthesiology score (ASA) scores and increased rates of obesity and dysplasia or cancer at the time of colectomy, and were less often on steroids (all P < 0.01). Over a median follow-up of 5 years, older patients reported increased daytime incontinence (60% vs 37%, P < 0.01) and pad usage (34% vs 11%, P < 0.01) at up to 1.5 years post-IPAA, after which time the groups became similar. Other functional outcomes, including pouch failure and quality of life, were similar between the 2 groups across the follow-up periods.

Performing an IPAA on carefully selected patients older than age 50 years has minor, transient differences in pouch function compared with patients younger than age 50 years. Assuming appropriate patient selection, IPAA should continue to be offered to older patients without increased risk of compromised function or of pouch failure.

Restorative proctocolectomy in elderly inflammatory bowel disease [ IBD] patients is controversial and limited data are available on the outcomes of surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and long-term results of ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis in elderly patients, in a multicentre survey from European referral centres.

The International Pouch Database [IPD] combined 101 variables. Patients aged ≥ 65 years were matched on the basis of open versus laparoscopic surgery with a control group of consecutive younger unselected patients with a ratio of 1:2. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed t test, chi square and Fisher's exact tests, Kaplan-Meier function, and log-rank tests where appropriate.

In the IPD, 77 patients aged ≥ 65 years [Group A] and 154 control patients [Group B] were identified. Elderly patients had more comorbidities [p = 0.0001], longer disease duration [p = 0.001], less extensive disease [p = 0.006], more previous abdominal operations [p = 0.0006], surgery for cancer or dysplasia more frequently [p = 0.0001], fewer single-stage procedures [p = 0.03], more diversions after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA] [p = 0.05], and a higher laparoscopic conversion rate [p = 0.04]. Postoperative complications and pouch failure were similar between the groups, but Group A had more Clavien-Dindo IV-V complications [p = 0.04], and longer length of stay [p = 0.007]. Laparoscopy was associated with a shorter duration of surgery [p = 0.0001], and length of stay [p = 0.0001], and the same complication rate as open surgery.

Restorative proctocolectomy can be performed in selected elderly patients, but there is a higher risk of postoperative complications and longer length of stay in this group. Laparoscopy is associated with shorter operating time and length of stay.

The object of this study was to compare function and quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery having two different pouch designs.

Patients having RPC in an academic unit from 2000 who had had the loop-ileostomy closed by June 2013 were identified from the hospital medical records. They were sent a questionnaire regarding quality of life and interviewed using a pouch function score (PFS) described by Oresland (score 0-16, higher scores denote worse function).

One hundred and three patients underwent surgery, of whom 56 had a J-pouch design and 47 a K-pouch design, this being a double-folded Kock pouch without the nipple valve. No patients have had the pouch removed or defunctioned due to failure at a mean of 8 years. The reoperation rate was 11.6%. The mean PFS was 5.43 and 5.27 for J- and K-pouches, respectively (P = 0.766). More patients with a J-pouch reported a social handicap due to poor bowel function (P = 0.041). Patients with a PFS ≥ 8 had a poorer quality of life. A score of ≥ 8 was reported by 16% of K-pouch and 25% of J-pouch patients (P = 0.29).

RPC is a safe procedure with a low complication rate and good functional outcome. Small improvements in function have an impact on a patient's quality of life. Although the J-pouch is the most commonly used, the K-pouch has some advantages. Other pouch designs deserve further evaluation.

This ECCO topical review of the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] focuses on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, management and outcome of the two most common forms of inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, in elderly patients. The objective was to reach expert consensus to provide evidence-based guidance for clinical practice.

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is performed in ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis with a view to restoration of GI continuity and prevention of permanent faecal diversion. Debate exists as to its safety in older patients. This review aims to assess functional outcomes and safety of restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) in older compared to younger patients.

Literature search was performed for age-stratified studies which assessed functional outcomes of IPAA. Twelve papers were included overall. Patients were categorized into 'older' and 'younger' groups. Analysis was split into three separate parts: 1. Age cut-off of 50 ± 5 years (with sensitivity analysis); 2. Age cut-off of 65 ± years; 3. Long-term outcomes (>10 years).

With an age cut-off of 50 years (4327 versus 513 patients), complication rates were comparable with the exception of an increased rate of small-bowel obstruction in the younger patients (p = 0.034). At 1 year, 24-h stool frequency was significantly higher in the older patient group (p < 0.0001). Daytime (p < 0.0001) and night-time (p < 0.0001) incontinence rates were also significantly higher in older patients. Overall, function deteriorated with time across all ages; however, after 10 years, there was no significant difference in incontinence rates between age groups. Dehydration and electrolyte loss was a significant problem in patients over 65 (p < 0.0001). Despite differences in postoperative function, quality of life was comparable between groups; however, only a few studies reported quality of life data.

IPAA is safe in older patients, although treating clinicians should bear in mind the increased risk of dehydration. Postoperative function is worse in older patients, but seems to level out with time and does not appear to significantly impact on overall quality of life and patient satisfaction. Assessment for suitability for RPC should not be based on chronological age in isolation. It is imperative that the correct support is given to older patients with worsened postoperative function in order to maintain patient satisfaction and adequate quality of life.

We compared long-term outcomes between adult and pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who underwent restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

We performed a retrospective study that analyzed data from consecutive patients with ileal pouches who presented to the subspecialty Pouch Center at the Cleveland Clinic from 2002-2011. Pouch outcomes of 104 pediatric patients (having pouch surgery at age <18 years; 53 male) were compared with those of 1135 adults (having pouch surgery at an age 18 years or older; 632 male).

Pediatric patients had a shorter duration from time of IBD diagnosis to colectomy than adult patients. Fewer pediatric than adult patients had a history of smoking, concomitant extraintestinal manifestations, or dysplasia as the indication for colectomy. However, pediatric patients had higher rates of pouch procedure-related complications, postoperative pouch-associated hospitalization, and postoperative use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents. In multivariate analysis, risk factors for pouch failure included preoperative use of anti-TNF agents (hazard ratio [HR], 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-3.13; P = .032), postoperative use of anti-TNF agents (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.31-3.27; P = .002), Crohn's disease of the pouch (HR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.28-3.82; P = .005), pouch procedure-related complications (HR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.55-4.64; P < .001), and postoperative pouch-associated hospitalization (HR, 25.20; 95% CI, 14.44-43.97; P < .001). Being a pediatric patient was not significantly associated with pouch failure in univariate or multivariate analyses (HR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.32-1.16; P = .13).

On the basis of an analysis of patients with IBD who underwent restorative proctocolectomy and presented at a subspecialized Pouch Center, patients who had the surgery at a pediatric age tend to have a higher incidence of postoperative pouch complications than adults. However, long-term rates of pouch retention were comparable.

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has become the most commonly used procedure for elective treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Since its original description, the procedure has been modified in order to obtain optimal functional results with low morbidity and mortality, and yet provide a cure for the disease. In this review of the literature of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, we discuss these technical modifications, limiting our discussion to the current points of controversy. The current "hot topics" for debate are: indications for ileal pouch-anal or ileo-rectal anastomosis, indications for pouch surgery in the elderly, indeterminate colitis and Crohn's disease, the place of the laparoscopic approach, transanal mucosectomy with hand-sewn anastomosis vs. the double-stapled technique, the use of diverting ileostomy and the issue of the best route for delivery of pregnant women. Longer follow-up of patients and increased knowledge and experience with pouch surgery, coupled with ongoing prospective evaluation of the procedure are required to settle these issues.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has a bimodal distribution with approximately 15 % of patients manifesting after age 65. Previous reports suggest an increased risk of surgical complications in the elderly.

To compare surgical outcomes in elderly IBD patients (≥ 65 years at the time of surgery) to matched younger IBD cohorts.

This was a retrospective cohort study at a single academic center of patients who underwent surgery for IBD. Forty-two elderly patients (≥ 65 years) were matched at least 1:1 (median 1:5) to patients in each of three control groups [18-35 years (n = 71); 36-49 years (n = 62); 50-64 years (n = 58)] according to gender, disease type/location, and type of surgery. Postoperative complications were compared. Patient characteristics were used in multivariate risk models. Analysis was performed using ordinary logistic regression.

Twenty ileal or ileocolonic resections, 12 partial or total colectomies, four stricturoplasties, and six laparoscopic partial or total colectomies were performed in the elderly group. The post-operative complication rate was not statistically different between the elderly and younger cohorts (38 % vs. 39 % vs. 40 % vs. 48 % in the 18-35, 36-49, 50-64, and ≥ 65 years groups, respectively, p = 0.26). The only significant risk factors for complication were Charlson comorbidity index (p = 0.0002), preoperative hemoglobin (p = 0.0065), total parenteral nutrition use (p = 0.024), and failed medical therapy (as the indication for surgery) (p = <0.0001).

The surgical complication rate among elderly and younger IBD patients was similar. Advanced age by itself should not be considered a risk factor for adverse operative outcome.

Population ageing is a global phenomenon. People aged 65 years and older comprise approximately 16% of the population of Europe. The medical management of elderly patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is challenging with respect to diagnosis, pharmaceutical and surgical treatment, and complications. IBD has a late onset in 10%-15% of patients, with the first flare occurring at 60 to 70 years of age; others suffer from the disease for several decades. Even though the natural course of the disease in geriatric populations and the diagnostic options may not differ much from those in younger patients, distinct problems exist in the choice of medical therapy. Recommended clinical practise has been rapidly evolving towards an intensified initial treatment in IBD. However, in patients older than 65 years, a gentler approach should be used, and a combination of immunosuppressive agents should be avoided because of increased risk of infectious and neoplastic complications. Furthermore, elderly patients with severe IBD show prolonged, complicated post-operative clinical courses with worse hospital outcomes, so early surgical intervention for elderly patients is recommended. This article provides an overview of elderly IBD patient care, including medical and surgical therapeutic considerations and emphasises the necessity of close collaborations between gastroenterologists and surgeons.

The aim of this study was to review the recent results of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in elderly patients compared with younger patients.

Retrospective evaluation was carried out based on a prospective Institutional Review Board approved database of patients who underwent IPAA from 2001 to 2008. Patients aged ≥ 65 years were matched with a group of patients aged < 65 years by gender, date of procedure, diagnosis and type of procedure performed. Preoperative and intra-operative data and early postoperative complications were obtained.

Thirty-three patients (22 women), 32 with mucosal ulcerative colitis, were included in each group. The elderly group had a mean age of 68.7 years, body mass index of 27 kg/m², duration of disease of 17.4 years, high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and high incidence of comorbid conditions (87.9% had one or more). Dysplasia and carcinoma were the indication for the surgery in more than 50% of patients, followed by refractory disease (24.4%). The matched younger group had a mean age of 36.9 years, body mass index of 25.4 kg/m², shorter duration of disease (8.1 years; P = 0.001), lower ASA score (P = 0.0001) and lower comorbidity (42.4%; P = 0.0002). Operative data were similar for both groups. The elderly group had a higher rate of rehospitalization for dehydration (P = 0.02). Other medical complications (30 vs 27%) and surgical postoperative complications (33 vs 24%) were similar for both groups. The long-term function and complications were comparable for the groups.

Elderly patients who underwent IPAA had more comorbid conditions than younger patients. Except for rehospitalization for dehydration, medical and surgical postoperative complications were not different in the two groups.

Still referred to as a new surgical procedure, the ileal-anal pouch or restorative proctocolectomy is now in its 30th year. Over this time the procedure has become the standard of care for patients with ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis who require surgery. For many patients it not only eradicates disease, but also preserves the anal sphincter, therefore enabling the patient to defecate in the normal way. Much research over the years has explored optimum surgical techniques, pouch function/capacity, pouch failure and pouch satisfaction and its long-term follow-up. This article reviews literature relating to the ileal-anal pouch and traces its journey through the past three decades, providing an overview of how the pouch has evolved and considers its future development.

The anal transition zone (ATZ) after ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis is considered at risk for dysplasia and persistent or recurrent disease activity. The long-term fate of the ATZ and the effects of histologic changes on defecatory function are not well-known.

To evaluate the inflammatory and preneoplastic changes of the ATZ in patients without preoperative dysplasia, yearly biopsies of the ATZ were obtained and functional results recorded on a questionnaire/diary. Histologic changes were correlated with simultaneous assessment of defecatory function.

Between 1992 and 2006, 225 patients underwent a stapled IPAA. A total of 238 successful biopsies of the ATZ were performed. There was no dysplasia found. Acute inflammation was noted in 4.6%, chronic inflammation in 84.9%, and normal mucosa in 10.5% of cases. Patients with chronic inflammation reported an average of 6.2+/-1.7 bowel movements/day and 93.2% of them were able to delay a bowel movement for at least 30 min. The presence of chronic ATZ inflammation did not seem to have a negative impact on function, with 96.1% of patients reporting perfect continence, and only 5.3% using protective pads.

Preservation of the ATZ in selected patients is safe and offers excellent long-term functional results. New onset dysplasia was not noted. Chronic inflammation had limited clinical impact. Presence of ATZ inflammation in a total of 89.5% of patients warrants life-long surveillance with biopsies.

Since 1977, restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis (IAA) has evolved into the surgical treatment of choice for most patients with intractable ulcerative colitis. Construction of an ileal pouch reservoir is now standard, usually in the form of J pouch (IPAA). The aim of this report is to review selection criteria for, and functional outcomes, follow-up and management of complications of IPAA after 30 years of widespread clinical application.

Literature published in English on the clinical indications, surgical technique, morbidity, complications and outcome following IAA and IPAA was sourced by electronic search, performed independently by two reviewers who selected potentially relevant papers based on title and abstract. Additional articles were identified by cross-referencing from papers retrieved in the initial search.

The functional results of IPAA are good. Pouchitis, irritable pouch syndrome and cuffitis are specific long-term complications but rarely result in failure. Pouch salvage is possible in selected patients with poor functional outcomes. One-stage operations are increasingly performed.

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the standard of care for the 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis who ultimately require colectomy. IPAA is favored by patients because it avoids the necessity for a long-term stoma. This review examines how 3 decades of experience with IPAA has molded current practice, highlighting 5- and 10-year follow-up of large series to determine durability and functional performance, in addition to causes of failure and the management of complications.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a clinical entity that predominantly affects young adults yet large series of middle age or elderly patients with UC are infrequently reported. The aim of this study is to identify patterns of disease, indications for operation, surgical treatment, and outcome of patients more than 50 years of age who required surgery for UC in Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Medical Centers.

A population-based study on all patients in 159 hospitals of the DVA from 1997 to 2001 was carried out. Data were compiled from several national computerized VA data sets. Supplementary information including demographic information, discharge summaries, operative reports and pathology reports were obtained from local medical records. Patient variables were entered into a computerized database and analyzed using the Pearson chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Statistical significance is designated as P < 0.05.

One hundred fifty-eight patients were evaluable. The mean age was 59 years (range 51-81); 99% were male. The mean duration of UC was 23 years (range 2 to 50). One hundred of the 158 patients had proctocolitis; 58 had either left-sided colitis or proctosigmoiditis. The mean dose of prednisone prior to surgery was 20 mg; the mean duration of steroid use was 8 years. The indications for elective surgery were intractability (59%), mass or stricture (27%), and dysplasia (14%). Twenty of the 158 patients (12%) were operated on emergently for either toxic colitis, perforation, or hemorrhage. One hundred three of the 158 underwent proctocolectomy and permanent ileostomy, 55 underwent a restorative proctocolectomy, and underwent a segmental colectomy. Twenty of the 158 patients were found to have dysplasia in their colectomy specimens; an additional 10 (7%) were found to have invasive cancer. Surgical morbidity was 22%. Overall mortality was 4% (7 of 158); all but 1 death occurred after emergent surgery. Mean hospitalization was 36 days (range 2 to 297).

Restorative proctocolectomy was performed in 36% of veterans more than 50 years of age requiring surgery for UC. The majority required surgery for intractable symptoms. Dysplasia and invasive cancer was found in 18% of patients. Mortality after surgery for acute surgical emergencies remains high.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate how age affects functional outcome and quality of life after ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Because of the limited number of older patients undergoing IPAA, it has been difficult to assess functional outcome and quality of life stratified by age. METHODS IPAA was performed in 1895 patients. Patients were stratified by age into <45 (n = 1410), 46-55 (n = 289), 56-65 (n = 154), and more than 65 years (n = 42). Outcome was assessed prospectively. Results are presented at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years after surgery.RESULTS Patients were followed for 4.6 +/- 3.7 years (maximum, 17 years). Pouch failure occurred in 4.1% (pouch excision or permanent diversion). Incontinence and night time seepage were more common in older patients. There were minor differences in the quality of life, health, energy and happiness between age groups, with a slight benefit for those under 45 years. Fourteen percent or fewer patients experienced social, sexual or work restrictions. Overall, 96% of patients were happy to have undergone their surgery, and 98% recommended it to others. Although the respective figures were 89% and 96% in the over-65 age group, the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS These data provide a unique assessment of outcome after IPAA at multiple time points. Although functional outcome after IPAA is not as good in older patients, appropriate case selection confers acceptable function and quality of life to patients of all ages.

Aspects of ileal pouch surgery remain controversial. The authors' single practice experience of 107 operations illustrates many of them. It was hoped that its study would contribute usefully to the debate.

Details of all 107 restorative proctocolectomies carried out since the operation was started in Gloucester in 1984 until the study period ended have been kept prospectively. All patients had proctectomy by mesorectal dissection, and 106 had W pouch restoration. Four suffered functional failure requiring reversion to ileostomy and three patients have died. The remaining 99 were sent a questionnaire concerning pelvic visceral function and evidence of pouchitis. Records of all but one of the patients have been reviewed.

Surgical morbidity was low with neither chronic pelvic sepsis, pouch related fistula, pouch haemorrhage nor pouch ischaemia. Mucosectomised patients had similar bowel control to the stapled group. The policy change from routine to selective protective ileostomy proved satisfactory. W pouch function was found to be comparable to that reported from major J pouch series, although anti-diarrhoeal usage was reduced, and was not influenced by either gender, age or time since surgery.

None of the following reasonably intuitive assumptions seem supported by our findings: that mesorectal excision necessarily poses a greater danger to pelvic visceral function than close rectal dissection, that the greater capacity of W pouches will be reflected in markedly less frequency, that mucosectomy would impair anal control, or that a defunctioning ileostomy is a mandatory precaution. Pouch frequency is less if wind can be passed separately; otherwise functional outcome seems determined by other, non-technical, factors.

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis has become the most commonly used procedure for elective treatment of patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Since its original description, the procedure has been modified in an attempt to obtain optimal functional results with low morbidity and mortality, and yet provide a cure for the disease. These modifications of the technique are discussed in this review, limited to the current points of controversy. We reviewed the current literature describing restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis. The current "hot topics" for debate are transanal mucosectomy with hand-sewn anastomosis versus the double-stapled technique, the use of diverting ileostomy, indeterminate colitis, the role of laparoscopy, and indications for pouch surgery in the elderly. Longer follow-up of patients and increased knowledge and experience with pouch surgery, coupled with active prospective evaluation of the procedure are required to settle these issues. Patients must be fully informed to understand inherent risks of each choice.

To assess long-term outcomes after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for chronic ulcerative colitis (CUC) with specific emphasis on patient sex, childbirth, and age.

Childbirth and the process of aging affect pelvic floor and anal sphincter function independently. Early function after IPAA is good for most patients. Nonetheless, there are concerns about the impact of the aging process as well as pregnancy on long-term functional outcomes after IPAA.

Functional outcomes using a standardized questionnaire were prospectively assessed for each patient on an annual basis.

Of the 1,454 patients who underwent IPAA for CUC between 1981 and 1994, 1,386 were part of this study. Median age was 32 years. Median length of follow-up was 8 years. Pelvic sepsis was the primary cause of pouch failure irrespective of sex or age. Functional outcomes were comparable between men and women. Eighty-five women who became pregnant after IPAA had pouch function, which was comparable with women who did not have a child. Daytime and nocturnal incontinence affected older patients more frequently than younger ones. Incontinence became more common the longer the follow-up in older patients, but this was not found in younger patients. Poor anal function led to pouch excision in only 3 of 204 older patients.

Incontinence rates were significantly higher in older patients after IPAA for CUC compared with younger patients. However, this did not contribute to a greater risk of pouch failure in these older patients. Patient sex and uncomplicated childbirth did not affect long-term functional outcomes.

This study was undertaken to compare functional results, complications, preoperative durations of disease, and rates of dysplasia and neoplasia between older and younger chronic ulcerative colitis patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with mucosectomy.

A total of 392 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of chronic ulcerative colitis underwent elective RPC with mucosection and handsewn ileoanal anastomosis. Pathologic reports were reviewed, with specific reference to findings of dysplasia or cancer. Functional results concerning the number of bowel movements per 24 hour period and the incidence of fecal soilage were obtained by direct or telephone patient interview.

Group I consisted of 326 patients aged 5 to 49 (mean, 30.9) years and 160 women. Group II comprised 66 patients aged 50 to 74 (mean, 56.9) years and 29 women. Duration of disease was significantly longer in the older group (6.2 vs. 15.6 years; P < 0.001). The older group had significantly higher rates of dysplasia (29/326 vs. 19/66; P < 0.0001) and malignancy (14/326 vs. 9/66; P = 0.003). Rates of complication, hospital days following RPC, and total hospital days for all causes were comparable between groups. Perfect day-time continence was observed in 81.6 percent of Group I and 80 percent of Group II patients (213/261 vs. 40/50; P = 0.79). Perfect continence during sleep was observed in 65.1 percent of Group I and 62 percent of Group II patients (170/261 vs. 31/50; P = 0.67). Mean number of bowel movements per 24 hour period for Group I was 6.3 +/- 0.2 and for Group II was 7.4 +/- 0.5. Mean difference, one movement per 24 hours, was not significant (95 percent confidence interval, -0.02 to 2.1; t = 1.95, P = 0.055).

We conclude that patients older than 50 years are suitable candidates for RPC with mucosectomy. Functional results and complication rates are similar to those observed among younger patients. Patients older than 50 years have a significantly higher rate of concurrent dysplasia and malignant degeneration than younger patients, most probably because of a longer duration of disease. RPC with mucosal excision potentially lowers this risk by elimination of all colorectal mucosa.

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is a technically demanding, lengthy procedure with substantial associated morbidity. Some have suggested that this procedure should not be performed in older patients. This study was conducted to evaluate whether older patients have a poorer functional outcome and higher complication rate than younger patients who undergo IPAA.

The 455 patients who have undergone IPAA at this institution were stratified according to age (< 55 versus > 55) to compare functional outcome and complication rates. The data were prospectively collected. The groups included 32 patients > 55 (7%) and 423 patients < 55. Comparisons were made with regard to stool frequency, incontinence rates, post-IPAA complications, postileostomy closure complications, and results 12 months postileostomy closure.

Preoperative anal sphincter resting and squeeze pressures were significantly lower in the > 55 group. Most complication rates were similar after IPAA except dehydration rates, which were higher in the older patients than the younger ones (27% versus 11%, respectively). Pre-ileostomy closure anal sphincter resting and squeeze pressures were not significantly lower in patients older than 55. Twenty-four hour daytime and nighttime stool frequencies were significantly higher in the > 55 group, as were daytime and nighttime stool incontinence.

Although functional outcome is poorer and some complications are higher in the > 55 group, the procedure can be safely performed with acceptable results and is greatly preferred by this population over permanent ileostomy.

The aim of this study was to determine whether coordinated activity exists across a stapled enteroanal anastomosis.

Twenty-nine patients were studied for a median of one year after complete excision of the rectum and stapled enteroanal anastomosis; 12 patients underwent low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis for carcinoma, and 17 patients underwent restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis.

Maximum anal resting pressures were slightly lower after coloanal anastomosis than after ileoanal anastomosis [median range, 56 (11-60) cm H2O, cf 69 (40-107) cm H2O, P = NS]. During distention of the neorectum, anal sphincter pressures at 2.5, 1.5, and 0.5 cm from the anal verge were significantly lower after coloanal anastomosis compared with after ileoanal anastomosis (P < 0.01 at each station). The volume of neorectal distention required to produce maximal inhibition of the anal sphincter was significantly less after coloanal anastomosis at 50 (range, 20-60) ml of air than after ileoanal anastomosis at 240 (range, 100-420) ml of air (P < 0.01). Minor fecal leakage and urgency of bowel action were significantly more common after coloanal anastomosis (P < 0.01).

Alterations in the dynamic response of the anal sphincter to distention of the neorectum may explain why the clinical results were better after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis than after coloanal anastomosis.