Evolutionary medicine emerged in the late twentieth century, integrating principles of natural selection and adaptation with the health sciences. Today, with a rapidly widening gap between the biology of Homo sapiens and its environment, maladaptation or maladaptive disorders can be detected in almost all diseases, including liver dysfunction. However, in hepatology, as in most medical specialties, evolutionary considerations are neglected because the majority of the medical community is not familiar with evolutionary principles. The aim of this brief review is to highlight an evolutionary approach that may facilitate understanding various liver diseases.

Microorganisms of clinical importance frequently develop resistance to drug therapy, now a growing problem. The experience with Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a representative example of increasing multi-drug resistance. To avoid reaching a crisis in which patients could be left without adequate treatment, a new strategy is needed. Anti-microbial therapy has historically targeted the mechanisms rather than origin of drug resistance, thus allowing microorganisms to adapt and survive.

This contribution analyses the historical development (1943-2020) of the evolution of multi-drug resistance by M. tuberculosis strains in light of Darwin's and Lamarck's theories of evolution.

Regarding the molecular origin of microbial drug resistance, genetic mutations and epigenetic modifications are known to participate. The analysis of the history of drug resistance by M. tuberculosis evidences a gradual development of resistance to some antibiotics, undoubtedly due to random mutations together with natural selection based on environmental pressures (e.g., antibiotics), representing Darwin's idea. More rapid adaptation of M. tuberculosis to new antibiotic treatments has also occurred, probably because of heritable acquired characteristics, evidencing Lamarck's proposal. Therefore, microbial infections should be treated with an antibiotic producing null or low mutagenic activity along with a resistance inhibitor, preferably in a single medication.

Antiviral therapy can lead to drug resistance, but multiple factors determine the frequency of drug resistance mutations and the clinical consequences. When chronic infections caused by Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) and Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) are compared with acute infections such as influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and other respiratory viruses, there are similarities in how and why antiviral resistance substitutions occur, but the clinical significance can be quite different. Emergence of resistant variants has implications for design of new therapeutics, treatment guidelines, clinical trial design, resistance monitoring, reporting, and interpretation. In this discussion paper, we consider the molecular factors contributing to antiviral drug resistance substitutions, and a comparison is made between chronic and acute infections. The implications of resistance are considered for clinical trial endpoints and public health, as well as the requirements for therapeutic monitoring in clinical practice with acute viral infections.

European guidelines recommend treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection (CHB) with the nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) entecavir or tenofovir. However, many European CHB patients have been exposed to other NAs, which are associated with therapy failure and resistance. The CAPRE study was performed to gain insight in prevalence and characteristics of NA resistance in Europe.

A survey was performed on genotypic resistance testing results acquired during routine monitoring of CHB patients with detectable serum hepatitis B virus DNA in European tertiary referral centers.

Data from 1568 patients were included. The majority (73.8%) were exposed to lamivudine monotherapy. Drug-resistant strains were detected in 52.7%. The most frequently encountered primary mutation was M204V/I (48.7%), followed by A181T/V (3.8%) and N236T (2.6%). In patients exposed to entecavir (n = 102), full resistance was present in 35.3%. Independent risk factors for resistance were age, viral load, and lamivudine exposure (P < .001).

These findings support resistance testing in cases of apparent NA therapy failure. This survey highlights the impact of exposure to lamivudine and adefovir on development of drug resistance and cross-resistance. Continued use of these NAs needs to be reconsidered at a pan-European level.

Entecavir (ETV) plus adefovir (ADV) combination therapy is one of the useful treatment option for the patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who had failed on prior nucleos(t) ide analogue (NA) treatments. This study compared the efficacies of the combinations of ETV 0.5 mg plus ADV and ETV 1.0 mg plus ADV in patients who had failed on prior multiple NA treatments. This retrospective analysis included 148 consecutive patients with CHB infection in Korea (n = 37 with ETV 0.5 mg plus ADV and n = 111 with ETV 1.0 mg plus ADV). The virological and biochemical responses were compared between the two groups. The cumulative probability of viral suppression of ETV 0.5 mg plus ADV was not inferior to that of ETV 1.0 mg plus ADV (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-1.08; P = 0.094). The changes in serum HBV DNA level in the ETV 0.5 mg plus ADV group were not different between the two groups over 12 months. Moreover, no significant difference was observed in acquiring ETV-resistant variants between the two groups during the treatment (HR, 0.95; P = 0.953). This study suggests the proof-of-concept that the lower dose of NA in combination with other NA might be the theoretical option for rescue combination therapy in patients with CHB who had failed on prior multiple NA treatments in order to reduce systemic exposure and possible side effects of NA.

Rescue antiviral treatment for patients with resistance to preexisting nucleos(t)ide analogues remains a clinical challenge. The correct choice of a first-line treatment of high potency and with a high genetic barrier to achieve sustained long-term suppression of viral replication provides the best chance of preventing treatment failure and the emergence of drug resistance. The management of treatment failure and drug resistance requires a precise and accurate clinical and virologic monitoring. Combination treatment with antiviral drugs that belong to different groups is associated with a lower chance of developing resistance to rescue drugs. To guarantee better control of viral replication in patients with drug resistance, the addition of another drug without a cross resistance profile should be given as early as possible, preferably at the time when genotypic resistance emerges. Long-term surveillance for treatment efficacy and possible emergence of drug resistance should be continued to prevent the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains.

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection can lead to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Current therapies have a very limited efficacy in virus clearance. New antiviral targets and agents are urgently needed. The envelope of HBV virion contains three surface glycoproteins, namely the large (LHBs), middle (MHBs), and small (SHBs) proteins. LHBs has an amino terminal preS which is composed of the preS1 and preS2 domains. The amino half of preS1 which is myristoylated plays a pivotal role in HBV entry, which can be exploited as an antiviral target. A common motif of five amino acids had been previously discovered to bind preS11–65 and HBV particles. In this study, we used preS11–65 to screen a phage display library of random penta-peptides to select the penta-peptides possessing a high preS1-binding affinity. After nine rounds of panning, we obtained one peptide designated as A5 which could bind preS1 with a high affinity. By systematically substituting each residue of A5 with the other 19 amino acids, we identified a novel peptide with an increased preS1-binding affinity. Both peptides could inhibit HBV attachment to HepG2 cells, making them be potential candidates for HBV entry inhibitors.

The emergence of mutations that confer drug resistance in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is increasing in China. We aimed to compare the cumulative efficacy and resistance of adefovir (ADV) monotherapy and ADV add-on lamivudine (LAM) (ADV+LAM) therapy in LAM-resistant patients. One-hundred adult CHB patients with LAM-resistance mutations were identified. Of these 100, 52 patients were treated with ADV monotherapy and 48 were treated with ADV+LAM combination therapy for at least 24 months. After 2-year treatment, the cumulative rates of serum alanine aminotransferase normalization were, respectively, 73.1 and 83.3 % in the ADV monotherapy and ADV+LAM therapy groups (P = 0.216). Additionally, 36 patients receiving ADV plus LAM had hepatitis B e antigen loss/seroconversion, as compared with 30 in patients (P = 0.068). More patients who received LAM plus ADV than those who received ADV alone had HBV DNA levels below 1,000 international unit/milliliters (83.3 vs. 50 %, P < 0.001). Viral breakthrough and genotypic mutations were detected in 19 (36.5 %) and 9 (18.8 %) patients in the ADV monotherapy and ADV+LAM therapy groups, respectively (P = 0.048). ADV+LAM combination therapy demonstrated faster and significantly greater suppression of HBV DNA compared with ADV therapy alone for patients with LAM-resistance mutations. ADV+LAM was superior to ADV monotherapy in achieving the initial viral breakthrough and genotypic mutations. ADV+LAM combination therapy was rational for most of LAM-resistant Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Previous studies in mouse models of self-limited viral hepatitis showed that platelets contribute to acute liver damage by promoting the intrahepatic accumulation of virus-specific CD8 T cells and, secondarily, virus-non-specific inflammatory cells. Built on these observations, a recent preclinical study took advantage of a previously established hepatitis B virus (HBV) transgenic mouse model of immune-mediated chronic hepatitis that progresses to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), to demonstrate that clinically achievable doses of the anti-platelet drugs aspirin and clopidogrel - administered continuously after the onset of liver disease - can prevent hepatocarcinogenesis and greatly improve overall survival. These outcomes were preceded by and associated with reduced hepatic accumulation of virus-specific CD8 T cells and virus-non-specific inflammatory cells, reduced hepatocellular injury and hepatocellular proliferation, and reduced severity of liver fibrosis. The observation that anti-platelet therapy inhibits HCC development identifies platelets as key players in the pathogenesis of HBV-associated liver cancer and supports the notion that a sustained immune-mediated necroinflammatory liver disease is sufficient to trigger HCC. The results abovementioned and their clinical implications are discussed in this report.

To assess the functions of mismatched short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) that inhibit replication and the expression of hepatitis B virus (HBV), two shRNAs possessing a 2- or 3-base mismatch that targeted HBV were studied.

shRNAs and pHY106-HBV were cotransfected into HepG2 cells. The culture supernatants were collected and used in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) assays. The levels of HBsAg and HBcAg mRNA were detected by reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR). HBV DNA replication intermediates were extracted for Southern blot hybridization.

The results demonstrate that mismatched shRNA-458 and shRNA-635 can significantly inhibit HBsAg and HBeAg protein expression, and the maximal inhibition ratio for both proteins was found at 72 h after cotransfection: 80 and 50 %, respectively. Similar inhibitory effects were found on HBsAg and HBcAg mRNA levels and HBV DNA replication intermediates at 72 h after cotransfection, and the inhibition ratio was found to be approximately 70 and 90 %, respectively.

Despite the 2- or 3-base mismatch between the shRNAs and the HBV target sequences, shRNA-458 and shRNA-635 exerted a significant inhibitory effect on HBsAg and HBeAg expression and HBV replication. This indicates that mismatched shRNAs could be a promising therapy for HBV.

This chapter describes the procedures for the generation of recombinant hepatitis B virus (HBV) that contains the polymerase/reverse transcriptase (pol/RT) gene from clinical isolates. It also contains procedures for phenotypic testing of the recombinant HBV in HepG2 cells for susceptibility to nucleos(t)ide analogs. Amplification and cloning of the pol/RT gene as opposed to the full-length HBV genome from a clinical isolate allows for clinical samples with lower viral loads to be successfully analyzed. Furthermore, it enables a direct comparison of sequence changes in the pol/RT region between isolates.

Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) are a breakthrough in the treatment and management of chronic hepatitis B. NA could suppress the replication of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and control the progression of the disease. However, drug resistance caused by their long-term use becomes a practical problem, which influences the long-term outcomes in patients. Liver transplantation is the only choice for patients with HBV-related end-stage liver disease. But, the recurrence of HBV after transplantation often caused by the development of drug resistance leads to unfavorable outcomes for the recipients. Recently, the multi-drug resistance (MDR) has become a common issue raised due to the development and clinical application of a variety of NA. This may complicate the antiviral therapy and bring poorly prognostic outcomes. Although clinical evidence has suggested that combination therapy with different NA could effectively reduce the viral load in patients with MDR, the advent of new antiviral agents with high potency and high genetic barrier to resistance brings hope to antiviral therapy. The future of HBV researches relies on how to prevent the MDR occurrence and develop reasonable and effective treatment strategies. This review focuses on the diagnostic and therapeutic progress in MDR caused by the anti-HBV NA and describes some new research progress in this field.

Long-term viral suppression is a major goal to prevent disease progression in patients with HBV. Aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of entecavir plus tenofovir combination in 57 CHB partial responders or multidrug resistant patients.

Investigator-initiated open-label cohort study. Quantitative HBV-DNA measurement and resistance testing (line-probe-assays and direct-sequencing) at baseline and every 3 months.

Fifty seven patients (37 HBeAg+), median age 45 years, previously treated with a median of three lines of antiviral therapy (range 1-6), 24/57 with advanced liver disease, were included. Median ALT at baseline was 1.0 ULN (range 0.3-22) and HBV-DNA 1.5 × 10(4)IU/ml (range 500-1 × 10(11)IU/ml). Median treatment duration of combination therapy was 21 months. HBV-DNA level dropped 3 logs (median, range 0-8 log; p<0.0001), 51/57 patients became HBV-DNA undetectable, median after 6 months (95% CI, 4.6-7). The probability for HBV DNA suppression was not reduced in patients with adefovir or entecavir resistance or in patients with advanced liver disease. Viral suppression led to decline in ALT (median 0.7 ULN; range 0.2-2.4; p=0.001). Five patients lost HBeAg (after 15, 18, 20, 21, and 27 months, respectively), one patient showed HBs-seroconversion. Patients with advanced disease did not show clinical decompensation, two patients with cirrhosis and undetectable HBV DNA developed HCCs. No death, newly induced renal impairment or lactic acidosis were reported.

Rescue therapy with entecavir and tenofovir in CHB patients harboring viral resistance patterns or showing only partial antiviral responses to preceding therapies was efficient, safe, and well tolerated in patients with and without advanced liver disease (249).

A variety of amino acid substitutions, such as K122I and G145R, have been identified around or within the a determinant of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), impair HBsAg secretion and antibody binding, and may be responsible for immune escape in patients. In this study, we examined how different substitutions at amino acid positions 122 and 145 of HBsAg influence HBsAg expression, secretion, and recognition by anti-HBs antibodies. The results showed that the hydrophobicity, the presence of the phenyl group, and the charges in the side chain of the amino acid residues at position 145 reduced HBsAg secretion and impaired reactivity with anti-HBs antibodies. Only the substitution K122I at position 122 affected HBsAg secretion and recognition by anti-HBs antibodies. Genetic immunization in mice demonstrated that the priming of anti-HBs antibody response was strongly impaired by the substitutions K122I, G145R, and others, like G145I, G145W, and G145E. Mice preimmunized with wild-type HBsAg (wtHBsAg) or variant HBsAg (vtHBsAg) were challenged by hydrodynamic injection (HI) with a replication-competent hepatitis B virus (HBV) clone. HBsAg persisted in peripheral blood for at least 3 days after HI in mice preimmunized with vtHBsAg but was undetectable in mice preimmunized with wtHBsAg, indicating that vtHBsAgs fail to induce proper immune responses for efficient HBsAg clearance. In conclusion, the biochemical properties of amino acid residues at positions 122 and 145 of HBsAg have a major effect on antigenicity and immunogenicity. In addition, the presence of proper anti-HBs antibodies is indispensable for the neutralization and clearance of HBsAg during HBV infection.

Drug resistance is a major limitation for the long-term efficacy of antiviral therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Antiviral resistance mutations may pre-exist in the overall viral population of untreated patients. We aimed to assess the prevalence of such hepatitis B virus (HBV) variants in a large cohort of NAs-naïve patients with CHB and to explore possible association with viral and host variables. Serum samples from 286 NAs-naïve consecutive patients with CHB were tested for serum HBV-DNA, and 255 of them having HBV-DNA > 1000 IU/mL were further analysed for drug resistance mutations by INNO-LiPA HBV DRv2/v3. NAs-naïve patients analysed were mainly men (73%), Caucasians (85%), hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) negative (79%) and genotype D (69%), with a mean age of 43.2 ± 13.4 years. HBV mutations associated with antiviral drug resistance were detected in 13 (5%) patients: three patients infected with HBV genotype C had the rtM204V + rtL180M mutations associated with lamivudine (LMV) resistance. Four patients had the rtI233V mutation that may reduce sensitivity to adefovir, and three patients had the rtM250L/V mutation typical of entecavir resistance. LMV compensatory mutations rtL80V and rtV173L were seen in two and one patients, respectively. No relationship was seen between presence of resistant or compensatory mutations and HBV-DNA levels, HBeAg/anti-HBe status or previous IFN therapy. These results confirm that HBV mutations, which confer resistance against currently available anti-HBV NAs, may already exist in patients who have never received the drug.

The study investigated the hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypic resistance profile in 1803 nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-experienced Chinese patients with chronic HBV infection. Serum HBV DNA was extracted, and the reverse transcriptase region was analysed by a high-sensitive direct PCR sequencing and verified by clonal sequencing if necessary. Drug-resistant mutations were detected in 560 of the 1803 patients, including 214 of 490 patients who received lamivudine (LAM), 35 of 428 patients who received adefovir (ADV), five of 18 patients who received telbivudine and 306 of 794 patients who received various sequential/combined NA therapies. ADV-resistant mutations were detected in 36 of 381 patients who received LAM and then switched-to ADV in contrast to one of 82 patients who received ADV add-on LAM. Entecavir (ETV)-resistant mutations were detected not only in LAM- and ETV-treated patients but also in LAM-treated ETV-naïve patients. Double mutations rtM204I and rtL180M were detected more frequently in genotype C than in genotype B virus, and patients infected with this mutant had higher alanine transaminase levels than those infected with mutant containing the rtM204I substitution alone. Multidrug-resistant HBV strains were identified in eight patients, including two novel strains with mutational patterns rtL180M + A181V + S202G + M204V + N236T and rtL180M + S202G + M204V + N236T. The results provide new information on HBV genotypic resistance profiles in a large cohort of Chinese patients with chronic HBV infection and may have important clinical implication for HBV drug resistance management in China.

Little is known about the optimal management of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who developed multiple-drug resistance.

We assessed 91 patients with compensated CHB who developed adefovir-resistant mutations during adefovir monotherapy for lamivudine-resistant CHB. Of these, 41 were treated with a combination of lamivudine plus adefovir (LAM+ADV group) and 50 were treated with entecavir monotherapy (ETV group).

There were no significant differences between the two groups in baseline characteristics, including serum HBV DNA levels (p>0.05). The rate of virologic non-response (HBV DNA reduction <1 log(10) IU/ml at 6 months) was significantly greater in the LAM+ADV than in the ETV group (51.2% vs. 16.0%, p<0.01). At 12 months, HBV DNA declined less in the LAM+ADV than in the ETV group (-1.49+/-1.78 vs. -3.47+/-2.13 log(10) IU/ml, p<0.01). Only 12.2% and 22.0% of patients in the LAM+ADV and ETV groups, respectively, achieved complete virologic response (HBV DNA <60 IU/ml) at 12 months. Multivariable analysis showed that LAM+ADV group (OR=0.08, CI=0.02-0.28) and the presence of the rtA181V/T mutation (OR=0.21, CI=0.05-0.91) were independently associated with a decreased rate of virologic response (HBV DNA <2000 IU/ml) at 12 months.

In patients with CHB resistant to lamivudine and adefovir, combination therapy with these two drugs was not effective and was inferior to entecavir monotherapy in suppressing HBV DNA. However, the response to entecavir monotherapy was also not optimal. These results emphasize the importance of preventing the development of multidrug-resistant HBV and of exploration for adequate combination therapy in treatment of multidrug-resistant CHB.

Pre-existing antiviral-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) has been associated with primary non-response to lamivudine treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B, but little is known of the capacity for resistant HBV to cause primary infection.

The study was to investigate if Beijing patients with acute hepatitis B (AHB) are infected with drug-resistant HBV.

Sera were collected from 201 NA-untreated patients with AHB. Direct polymerase chain reaction (PCR) sequencing was used to screen HBV reverse-transcriptase (RT) domain and clonal sequencing were performed for all resistance-positive samples.

Direct PCR sequencing showed that 14 samples (7.0%) were positive for drug-resistant HBV variants, comprised of 11 with the lamivudine-resistant pattern rtM204I and/or rtM204V in the presence and absence of compensatory mutations rtL80I, rtV173L, and rtL180M; two with the adefovir-resistant pattern rtA181V; and one with the entecavir-resistant pattern rtL180M+rtS202G+rtM204V. Concomitance of resistance variants with wild-type HBV was observed in samples from 13 patients. Clonal sequencing verified direct sequencing results. Furthermore, variants associated with resistance to adefovir or entecavir were found in 3 samples.

Drug-resistant HBV strains, including those not resistant to lamivudine, are transmissible and can cause acute hepatitis B in China.

Entry of hepatitis B virus (HBV) into human hepatocytes constitutes the initial step in viral infection. The study of HBV entry had long been hampered by the lack of efficient cell culture systems and small animal models. The situation was greatly improved in the last decade with the development of HBV-infectible HepaRG cell line and primary Tupaia hepatocyte culture. Armed with these new tools, marked progresses have been achieved in the elucidation of the mechanism of HBV entry. Plenty of evidences indicate that the viral large surface protein (LHBs) is essential for HBV entry. Several regions in the PreS1 domain of LHBs have been verified to contribute directly to the viral attachment. In addition, a myristate moiety linked to the N-terminal glycine of PreS1 appears critical for HBV infectivity. Recently, the cysteine-rich antigenic loop of the S domain was identified as another crucial determinant for HBV infectivity. On the other hand, several cellular proteins were implicated in HBV attachment to hepatic cells, though definitive proofs are required in support to their functional involvement in HBV infection. Aiming to blocking viral entry, a couple of approaches based on acylated PreS1-derived peptides and short PreS1-binding peptides are currently under investigation, which have the potential to become novel antiviral therapeutics.

In spite of the progress made in vaccine and antiviral therapy development, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is still the most common cause of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, with more than 400 million people chronically infected worldwide. Antiviral therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues and/or immunomodulating peptides is the only option to control and prevent the progression of the disease in chronic hepatitis B (CHB)-infected patients. So far, the current antiviral monotherapy remains unsatisfactory because of the low efficacy and the development of drug resistance mutants. Moreover, viral rebound is frequently observed following therapy cessation, since covalent closed circular DNA (cccDNA) is not removed from hepatocytes by antiviral therapy. First, this review describes the current pharmacotherapy for the management of CHB and the new drug candidates being investigated. Then, the challenges in the development of drug delivery systems for the targeting of antiviral drugs to the liver parenchyma are discussed. Finally, perspectives in the design of a more efficient pharmacotherapy to eradicate the virus from the host are addressed.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype B and C seem not to affect the therapeutic response to lamivudine (3TC). Whether a given genotype has an earlier emergence of 3TC resistance remains unclear. We thus conducted this study to elucidate the association of HBV genotype with the emergence of 3TC-resistant strains in Taiwanese patients.

Forty chronic hepatitis B patients who developed resistance after 3TC therapy were retrospectively enrolled. HBV genotype, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and HBV DNA levels were determined at baseline. The presence of 3TC-resistant mutations was confirmed by direct sequencing whenever biochemical breakthrough developed.

The distribution of HBV genotype B and C in 40 patients receiving 3TC therapy were 60% and 40%, respectively. The mean interval to detect 3TC-resistant strain was 19.6 +/-1.7 months. By using multivariate analysis, HBV genotype B and higher pre-treatment HBV DNA level were independently associated with earlier detection of 3TC-resistant strains. In addition, genotype B was significantly associated with development of 3TC resistance within the first 12 months of 3TC therapy compared with genotype C (odds ratio 8.27; P=0.004).

Compared with HBV genotype C, genotype B appears to have an earlier biochemical resistance to 3TC than genotype C. Therefore, more frequent monitoring of viral load or genotypical resistance might be needed for patients with HBV genotype B infection receiving 3TC therapy, especially during the first year.

The efficacy of entecavir (ETV) monotherapy in treatment-experienced patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is debatable.

A total of 22 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive CHB patients who had shown viral breakthrough or suboptimal response with lamivudine (3TC) and adefovir disoproxil (ADV) therapy were treated with 1.0 mg of ETV. Clinical and virological parameters were monitored every 3 months. Restriction fragment mass polymorphism assays were used to detect antiviral resistance.

During 3TC and ADV therapy, 11 patients had rtM204V/I mutations, 2 had rtA181V/T or rtN236T, 7 had both and 2 had no 3TC- or ADV-related mutations. After switching to ETV monotherapy, the median change in serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level was -2.1 log(10) copies/ml. Virological response (HBV DNA<300 copies/ml) was achieved in 1 of 18 patients with pre-existing rt204 mutations, whereas it was achieved in all 4 patients without pre-existing rt204 mutations regardless of the presence of rt181 or rt236 mutations. Changes in mutational patterns during ETV therapy showed that rt204 mutations persisted or re-emerged. Relative abundances of rtM204V/I mutations in total viral populations gradually increased under ETV rescue, whereas those with rtA181V/T and rtN236T mutations decreased. ETV resistance mutations (rtL180M+rtT184I/L[rtS202G]+rtM204V) were detected in five patients with pre-existing rt204 mutations.

ETV monotherapy resulted in a limited virological response in patients who had previously failed 3TC and ADV rescue therapy. The limited efficacy might be associated with residual or reselected rtM204V/I mutations leading to ETV resistance. Combination treatment including potent antiviral agents should be recommended for patients with pre-existing rtM204V/I mutations.

Emergence of drug resistance in antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B negates treatment benefits. There is a lower chance for emergence of resistance for drugs with rapid and potent viral suppression and a high genetic barrier for resistant mutations. Measurement of viral load at 24 weeks' treatment to aid decision making is mandatory for patients receiving drugs that are associated with a higher resistance rate. Combination treatment with drugs that belong to different groups is associated with a lower chance of resistance. To ensure better control of viral replication in patients with drug resistance, the addition of another drug without an overlapping resistance profile should be given as early as possible, preferably at the time when genotypic resistance emerges. With such strategies, most patients can be maintained in clinical remission. However, because of the mechanism of viral persistence, research efforts should continue to anticipate and prevent the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains.

Patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection who develop antiviral resistance lose benefits of therapy and may be predisposed to further resistance. Entecavir (ETV) resistance (ETVr) results from HBV reverse transcriptase substitutions at positions T184, S202, or M250, which emerge in the presence of lamivudine (LVD) resistance substitutions M204I/V +/- L180M. Here, we summarize results from comprehensive resistance monitoring of patients with HBV who were continuously treated with ETV for up to 5 years. Monitoring included genotypic analysis of isolates from all patients at baseline and when HBV DNA was detectable by polymerase chain reaction (> or = 300 copies/mL) from Years 1 through 5. In addition, genotyping was performed on isolates from patients experiencing virologic breakthrough (> or = 1 log(10) rise in HBV DNA). In vitro phenotypic ETV susceptibility was determined for virologic breakthrough isolates, and for HBV containing novel substitutions emerging during treatment. The results over 5 years of therapy showed that in nucleoside-naïve patients, the cumulative probability of genotypic ETVr and genotypic ETVr associated with virologic breakthrough was 1.2% and 0.8%, respectively. In contrast, a reduced barrier to resistance was observed in LVD-refractory patients, as the LVD resistance substitutions, a partial requirement for ETVr, preexist, resulting in a 5-year cumulative probability of genotypic ETVr and genotypic ETVr associated with breakthrough of 51% and 43%, respectively. Importantly, only four patients who achieved < 300 copies/mL HBV DNA subsequently developed ETVr.

Long-term monitoring showed low rates of resistance in nucleoside-naïve patients during 5 years of ETV therapy, corresponding with potent viral suppression and a high genetic barrier to resistance. These findings support ETV as a primary therapy that enables prolonged treatment with potent viral suppression and minimal resistance.

To investigate the different clusters of mutations associated with lamivudine resistance in HBV genotypes D and A.

HBV reverse transcriptase sequences of 89 HBV-infected patients failing lamivudine treatment were analyzed. The association of mutations with HBV genotypes was assessed by Chi-Squared test and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Covariate analysis was based on hierarchical clustering.

In genotype A, the rtM204V (prevalence: 68.2%) was the main sign of lamivudine failure. Multivariate analysis confirmed that genotype A is the only predictor for rtM204V emergence (OR: 14.5 [95% CI: 1.3-158], P=0.02). Covariate analysis showed that rtM204V clusters with rtL180M, rtL229V (corresponding to sF220L in the HBsAg), and, interestingly, with HBsAg mutation sS207N (bootstrap=0.95). Both sF220L and sS207N co-localized in the fourth transmembrane HBsAg domain. In contrast, in genotype D the primary mutations rtM204V and rtM204I occurred with similar prevalence (39.1% versus 45.3%, P=0.47), and showed a distinct pattern of compensatory mutations. rtM204V clusters with mutations localized in the RT-B domain (rtV173L, rtL180M, and rtT184A/S) (bootstrap=0.94), while rtM204I clusters with mutations localized in the RT-A domain (rtS53N, rtT54Y, and rtL80I/V) (bootstrap=0.96) (without associations with HBsAg specific mutations).

HBV genotype plays an important role in driving RT evolution under lamivudine treatment, and thus can be relevant for therapeutic sequencing, immunological response and disease progression.

The management of hepatitis B virus resistance to antivirals has evolved rapidly in recent years. The definition of resistance is now well established, with the importance of partial response and the improvement of assays to detect genotypic resistance and virological breakthrough. Data on phenotypic resistance have allowed to define the cross-resistance profile for the main resistant mutants, providing a rationale for treatment adaptation. Clinical studies have shown that an early treatment intervention in case of a virological breakthrough or a partial response with the addition of a second drug having a complementary cross-resistance profile allows one to maintain the majority of patients in clinical remission. The prevention of resistance should rely on the use of the most potent antivirals with a high genetic barrier to resistance as a first-line therapy. The future perspectives are to design strategies to hasten the HBsAg clearance, which should become a new treatment endpoint, to prevent drug resistance and to decrease the incidence of complications of chronic hepatitis B.

Hepatitis B virus is responsible for much morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although the armament of drugs licensed for its treatment grows, it is increasingly apparent that the efficacy of these drugs is dependent upon much more that their pharmacology.

A better understanding of the natural history of chronic hepatitis B infection together with recent advances in the molecular biology of antiviral resistance have given added dimensions to physicians' decision-making thought processes.

The present review outlines the recent advances in diagnostic testing that enable a better understanding of an individual patient's phase of illness and also how such information can update treatment choices better. In the second part of this review, the licensed therapies and their relative merits are discussed, as is their role in managing resistance to antiviral therapy.

1. Hepatitis B virus replication is associated with a severe outcome in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. 2. Viral suppression induced by antivirals results in a clinical improvement that allows liver transplantation to be delayed or avoided. 3. Early treatment intervention is mandatory in patients with decompensated cirrhosis because of the delay in the restoration of liver functions. 4. Lamivudine is no longer the drug of choice because the initial enthusiasm has been tempered by the high rate of resistance development. 5. Early add-on therapy with adefovir allows us to rescue lamivudine resistance, but its use may be limited by nephrotoxicity. 6. Studies are ongoing with the newer generation of antivirals (telbivudine, tenofovir, entecavir, and emtricitabine) in monotherapy or in combination to determine the best strategy for achieving rapid and prolonged suppression of viral replication. These improved strategies should enhance treatment success enough to obtain clinical stabilization, to delay or prevent the need for transplantation, and to reduce the risk of hepatitis B virus recurrence on the graft.AASLD.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-targeted ribonuclease (HBV-TR) is a fused protein of HBV core protein and a ribonuclease, human eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (hEDN). Our previous results showed that HBV-TR could effectively inhibit HBV replication in vitro. To test whether HBV-TR can inhibit HBV replication in vivo, we constructed a recombinant adenoviral vector expressing HBV-TR (Ad-TR) and used it to treat HBV-transgenic mice. Immunohistochemical staining showed that TR was expressed at varied levels in different tissues of Ad-TR-treated mice. Serum HBsAg concentration was decreased by 64.8% for the Ad-TR-treated mice compared with empty adenoviral vector-treated control mice. The amount of HBV-DNA in the livers of the Ad-TR-treated mice was 0.74 x 10(7) copies/mug of genomic DNA while the amount of HBV-DNA in the livers of the empty adenoviral vector-treated control mice was 2.86 x 10(7) copies/mug of genomic DNA. Serum HBV-DNA of Ad-TR-treated mice was also decreased by 71.4% compared with empty adenoviral vector-treated control mice. In addition, for some Ad-TR-treated mice, the expression of HBsAg in the liver cells turned negative. No discernible adverse effects were observed for Ad-TR-treated mice. Taken together, our results indicated that adenovirus mediated transfer of HBV-TR can inhibit HBV replication in vivo.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV), the causative agent of B-type hepatitis in humans, is the type member of the Hepadnaviridae, hepatotropic DNA viruses that replicate via reverse transcription. Beyond long-established differences to retroviruses in gene expression and overall replication strategy newer work has uncovered additional distinctions in the mechanism of reverse transcription per se. These include protein-priming by the unique extra terminal protein domain of the reverse transcriptase (RT) utilizing an RNA hairpin for de novo initiation of first strand DNA synthesis, and the strict dependence of this process on cellular chaperones. Recent in vitro reconstitution systems enabled first biochemical insights into this multifactorial reaction, complemented by high resolution structural information on the RNA, though not yet the protein, level. Genetic approaches have revealed long-distance interactions in the nucleic acid templates as an important factor enabling the puzzling template switches required to produce the relaxed circular (RC) DNA found in infectious virions. Finally, the failure of even potent HBV RT inhibitors to eliminate nuclear covalently closed circular (ccc) DNA, the functional equivalent of integrated proviral DNA, has spurred a renewed interest in the mechanism of cccDNA generation. These new developments are in the focus of this review.