The prevalence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is increasing globally. Despite advancements in comprehending this intricate malignancy and formulating novel therapeutic approaches over the past few decades, the prognosis for ICC remains poor. Owing to the high degree of malignancy and insidious onset of ICC, numerous cases are detected at intermediate or advanced stages of the disease, hence eliminating the chance for surgical intervention. Moreover, because of the highly invasive characteristics of ICC, recurrence and metastasis postresection are prevalent, leading to a 5-year survival rate of only 20%-35% following surgery. In the past decade, different methods of treatment have been investigated, including transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, and combination therapies. For certain patients with advanced ICC, conversion treatment may be utilized to facilitate surgical resection and manage disease progression. This review summarizes the definition of downstaging conversion treatment and presents the clinical experience and evidence concerning conversion treatment for advanced ICC.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors and lenvatinib in the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (uICC).

This multicenter retrospective study screened patients with uICC who underwent TACE in combination with PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib between January 2019 and June 2023. Tislelizumab or camrelizumab (200 mg) was intravenously administered every three weeks. The daily dose of lenvatinib was 8 mg for patients weighing < 60 kg and 12 mg for those weighing ≥ 60 kg. In cases of disease progression, the therapeutic strategy was adjusted based on the clinical condition and individual patient's treatment preferences. Options included transitioning to standard or supportive care or continuing treatment with TACE in combination with PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary outcomes included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and the incidence of adverse events (AEs).

A total of 59 patients with uICC were included. Over a median follow-up period of 32.3 months, the median OS and PFS were 25.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.9-33.7) and 9.5 months (95% CI: 7.9-11.0), respectively. The ORR was 55.9%, and the DCR was 96.6%. Grade 3 or four AEs were observed in 15 of 59 patients (25.4%).

TACE combined with PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib demonstrated a promising therapeutic potential with a manageable safety profile for patients with uICC.

The combination of TACE, PD-1 inhibitors, and lenvatinib represents a novel therapeutic option for patients with uICC.

TACE plus PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib represent a promising therapeutic strategy for uICC. The safety profile of TACE plus PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib was manageable. This study demonstrated improved outcomes compared to prior standard-of-care treatments.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a rare yet notably aggressive cancer, has experienced a surge in incidence in recent years. Presently, surgical resection remains the most effective curative strategy for CCA. Nevertheless, a majority of patients with CCA are ineligible for surgical removal at the time of diagnosis. For advanced stages of CCA, the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is established as the standard chemotherapy regimen. Despite this, treatment efficacy is often hindered by the development of resistance. In recent times, immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly those that block programmed death 1 and its ligand (PD1/PD-L1), have emerged as promising strategies against a variety of cancers and are being increasingly integrated into the therapeutic landscape of CCA. A growing body of research supports that the use of PD1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies in conjunction with chemotherapy may significantly improve patient outcomes. This article seeks to meticulously review the latest studies on PD1/PD-L1 involvement in CCA, delving into their expression profiles, prognostic significance, contribution to oncogenic processes, and their potential clinical utility.

To compare the treatment efficacy and safety of lenvatinib and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor combined with oxaliplatin plus gemcitabine (Gemox) chemotherapy or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC).

This study involved 86 patients with advanced BTC receiving PD-1 inhibitor and lenvatinib combined with HAIC (P-L-H group) or Gemox chemothrapy (P-L-G group). Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1) analysis was used to balance potential bias. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), whereas the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

After PSM, a total of 60 patients were enrolled with 30 in the P-L-G group and 30 in the P-L-H group. The median PFS was significantly longer with P-L-G group (13.7 versus 6.0 months, p < 0.0001) than with the P-L-H group. The median OS was 23.8 months in the P-L-G group versus 11.6 months in the P-L-H group (p < 0.0001). Patients in the P-L-G group exhibited a better ORR (73.3 % vs 30 %, p = 0.002) compared to the P-L-H group. The DCR was the same in both groups, 96.7 %, respectively. The P-L-G group had a higher incidence of grade 3-4 AEs than the P-L-H group. However, there was no significant difference in the any grade or grade 3-4 of AEs between the two groups.

PD-1 inhibitor plus lenvatinib and Gemox are promising first-line regimens for the treatment of advanced BTC in the multicenter retrospective real-world study.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of biliary stenting implantation with iodine-125 seed strand (SI) followed by hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) plus lenvatinib (Len) with programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor for patients diagnosed with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) and malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ).

In this single-center retrospective study, the data of ECC patients with MOJ from March 2015 to January 2023 was assessed. Using probability score matching (PSM), the selection bias of patients was reduced. Primary study outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The OS and PFS were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and evaluated with the log-rank test.

A total of 104 patients were enrolled finally, including 52 patients treated with interventional therapy (SI+HAIC) plus Len with PD-1 inhibitor (SI+HAIC+Len+P group) and 52 patients treated with interventional therapy (SI+HAIC) plus lenvatinib (SI+HAIC+Len group). 26 pairs of patients were matched after PSM analysis. After PSM analysis, the median OS and PFS in the SI+HAIC+Len+P group were significantly longer compared to those in the SI+HAIC+Len group (OS:16.6 vs. 12.3 months, P = 0.001; PFS:12.6 vs 8.5 months, P = 0.004). The DCR was significantly different between groups (P = 0.039), while ORR not (P = 0.548). The addition of PD-1 inhibitor was generally well tolerated without treatment-associated mortality.

Interventional therapy (SI+HAIC) plus Len with PD-1 inhibitor was effective for ECC patients accompanied by MOJ with a manageable safety profile.

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is a refractory malignancy with an unfavorable prognosis and a high probability of recurrence. Systemic chemotherapy is critical for palliative treatment, but effective therapeutic strategies for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma after first-line chemotherapy failure are scarce. Here, we introduced a sustained benefit following sintilimab combined with lenvatinib plus S-1 in a patient with recurrent perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. A 52-year-old female patient was admitted to our hospital due to yellow skin and sclera, and further radiological examination revealed perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. The patient underwent surgery and histopathological results confirmed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma with metastatic lymph nodes. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 was given. One year after surgery, the patient experienced hepatic recurrence. Then, she received radiofrequency ablation combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin. Unfortunately, radiological assessment revealed progressive disease with multiple liver metastases after treatment. Subsequently, she received sintilimab combined with lenvatinib plus S-1 and the lesions were completely regressed following 14 cycles of combination therapy. The patient recovered well without disease recurrence at the last follow-up. Sintilimab combined with lenvatinib plus S-1 may be an alternative therapeutic option for chemotherapy-refractory perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, and further evaluation in a larger number of patients is needed.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has a poor prognosis, and surgical resection (SR) offers the only potential for cure. Unfortunately, only a small proportion of patients are eligible for resection due to locally advanced or metastatic disease. Locoregional therapies (LRT) are often used in unresectable liver-only or liver-dominant ICC. This review explores the role of these therapies in the treatment of ICC, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy, irreversible electroporation (IE), and brachytherapy. A search of the current literature was performed to examine types of LRT currently used in the treatment of ICC. We examined patient selection, technique, and outcomes of each type. Overall, LRTs are well-tolerated in the treatment of ICC and are effective in improving overall survival (OS) in this patient population. Further studies are needed to reduce bias from heterogenous patient populations and small sample sizes, as well as to determine whether certain LRTs are superior to others and to examine optimal treatment selection.