Heart transplantation is the gold standard treatment for patients with advanced heart failure in the absence of contraindications. In recent years, the shortage of heart donors has led to a resurgence in the use of hearts from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. In these donors, death is determined by the cessation of spontaneous circulation and respiration for≥5minutes and is confirmed by neurological criteria. Two heart procurement procedures are used, namely direct procurement and perfusion (DPP) and procurement after thoracoabdominal-normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP). Donor hearts procured using TA-NRP are reperfused and assessed inside the donor and preserved with static cold storage or ex situ machine perfusion. With DPP, hearts are reperfused and assessed ex situ with a perfusion machine. The ischaemic time before heart reperfusion is shorter with TA-NRP than with direct procurement followed by ex situ perfusion. The TA-NRP technique allows for the assessment of the function of the donor heart. Numerous studies have reported similar survival rates between recipients who have received hearts from DCD and donation after brain death (DBD) donors. The incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction varies according to the team's learning curve and the country. The heart utilization rate is greater with TA-NRP procurement than DPP. This article describes the two donor heart procurement techniques, provides a summary of the relevant literature on the outcomes of transplantation from DCD donors and reports the position of a working group, convened by the French national transplant agency, on donor and recipient selection.

Over the past two decades, the application of machine perfusion (MP) in human liver transplantation has moved from the realm of clinical exploration to routine clinical practice. Both in situ and ex situ perfusion strategies are feasible, safe, and may offer improvements in relevant post-transplant outcomes. An important utility of these strategies is the ability to transplant grafts traditionally considered too risky to transplant using conventional cold storage alone. While dynamic assessment and ultimately transplantation of such livers is an important goal for the international liver transplant community, its clinical application is inconsistent. To this end, ELITA (the European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association) gathered a panel of experts to create consensus guidelines regarding selection, approach, and criteria for deceased donor liver assessment in the MP era. An eight-member steering committee (SC) convened a panel of 44 professionals working in 14 countries in Europe and North America. The SC identified topics related to liver utilisation and assessment for transplantation. For each topic, subtopics were created to answer specific clinical questions. A systematic literature review was performed, and the panel graded relevant evidence. The SC drafted initial statements addressing each clinical question. Statements were presented at the in-person Consensus Meeting on Liver Discard and Viability Assessment during the ELITA Summit held from April 19-20, 2024, in Madrid, Spain. Online voting was held to approve statements according to a modified Delphi method; statements reaching ≥85% agreement were approved. Statements addressing liver utilisation, the definition of high-risk livers, and strategies and criteria for dynamic liver assessment are presented.

Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) is a novel technique developed to improve organ utilization and recipient outcomes following donation after circulatory death (DCD). NRP has revolutionized DCD liver transplant by extending donor criteria and reducing the incidence of ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) and other complications in recipients. However, there is significant geographic and center-specific variation in NRP use and practices. This review collates practices from pioneering NRP centers across the globe regarding donor selection criteria, NRP techniques, organ viability monitoring, and other key areas to help guide the continued growth of NRP liver transplantation.

DCD livers recovered using NRP have consistently demonstrated excellent outcomes, with IC and patient and graft survival rates approaching those seen with grafts from donation after brain death donors. Recently, transplant centers have been working to increase the DCD donor pool by relaxing limits on donor quality, reconsidering organ viability markers, and combining NRP with ex situ machine perfusion technologies.

NRP is a powerful organ recovery technology transforming the practice of DCD liver transplantation. Current evidence suggests that organ utilization could be further expanded using NRP recovery, with excellent clinical outcomes reported by centers using less stringent donor and organ viability criteria.

Controlled donation after the circulatory determination of death (cDCDD) has emerged as a strategy to increase the availability of organs for clinical use. Traditionally, organs from cDCDD donors have been subject to standard rapid recovery (SRR) with poor posttransplant outcomes of abdominal organs, particularly the liver, and limited organ utilization. Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP), based on the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation devices, consists of the in situ perfusion of organs that will be subject to transplantation with oxygenated blood under normothermic conditions after the declaration of death and before organ recovery. NRP is a potential solution to address the limitations of traditional recovery methods. It has become normal practice in several European countries and has been recently introduced in the United States. The increased use of NRP in cDCDD has occurred as a result of a growing body of evidence on its association with improved posttransplant outcomes and organ utilization compared with SRR. However, the expansion of NRP is precluded by obstacles of an organizational, legal, and ethical nature. This article details the technique of both abdominal and thoracoabdominal NRP. Based on the available evidence, it describes its benefits in terms of posttransplant outcomes of abdominal and thoracic organs and organ utilization. It addresses cost-effectiveness aspects of NRP, as well as logistical and ethical obstacles that limit the implementation of this innovative preservation strategy.

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) increased in the US over the past decade. However, 30% of DCD liver grafts procured for transplantation are not utilized. Barriers to DCD liver utilization include quality concerns, particularly the risk of ischemic cholangiopathy and retransplantation, and costs associated with DCD organ acquisition. This study investigated the attitudes of the liver transplantation community in the US toward DCD and identified barriers to DCD liver utilization.

RedCap survey of liver transplantation surgical directors in the US.

Of 101 liver transplantation surgical directors, 24 responded to the survey, and 96% of respondents accepted DCD donors. Most programs accepted livers from thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion with cold storage (96%), while substantially fewer accepted liver grafts from rapid recovery DCD donors with cold storage (67%). Sixty-five percent of transplant centers' functional warm ischemic time started when oxygen saturation or systolic blood pressure was <80%/mm Hg; 13% started at extubation, 17.4% started at systolic blood pressure <80 mm Hg, and 4.3% used a systolic blood pressure <50 mm Hg.

We found variability among transplant programs in DCD liver graft acceptance based on procuring surgeon, procurement technique, and storage modality. Quality and cost are two main barriers to DCD liver utilization, with the main tradeoffs being between rapid recovery with static cold storage (lower cost, lower quality) and machine perfusion/normothermic regional perfusion (higher cost, better quality).

In recent years, there has been resurgence in donation after circulatory death (DCD). Despite that, the number of organs transplanted from these donors remains low due to concerns about their function and a lack of an objective assessment at the time of donation. This overview examines the current DCD practices and the classification modifications to accommodate regional perspectives. Several risk factors underscore the reluctance to accept DCD organs, and we discuss the modern strategies to mitigate them. The advent of machine perfusion technology has revolutionized the field of DCD transplantation, leading to improved outcomes and better organ usage. With many strategies at our disposal, there is an urgent need for comparative trials to determine the optimal use of perfusion technologies for each donated organ type. Additional progress in defining therapeutic strategies to repair the damage sustained during the dying process should further improve DCD organ utilization and outcomes. However, there remains wide variability in access to DCD donation and transplantation, and organizational efforts should be doubled up with consensus on key ethical issues that still surround DCD donation in the era of machine perfusion.

The demand for liver transplantation has led to the utilization of marginal grafts including moderately macrosteatotic livers (macrosteatosis ≥30% [Mas30]), which are associated with an elevated risk of graft failure. Machine perfusion (MP) has emerged as a technique for organ preservation and viability testing; however, little is known about MP in Mas30 livers. This study evaluates the utilization and outcomes of Mas30 livers in the era of MP.

The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database was queried to identify biopsy-proven Mas30 deceased donor liver grafts between June 1, 2016, and June 23, 2023. Univariable and multivariable models were constructed to study the association between MP and graft utilization and survival.

The final cohort with 3317 Mas30 livers was identified, of which 72 underwent MP and were compared with 3245 non-MP livers. Among Mas30 livers, 62 (MP) and 1832 (non-MP) were transplanted (utilization of 86.1% versus 56.4%, P  < 0.001). Donor and recipient characteristics were comparable between MP and non-MP groups. In adjusted analyses, MP was associated with significantly increased Mas30 graft utilization (odds ratio, 7.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.76-16.58; P  < 0.001). In log-rank tests, MP was not associated with 1- and 3-y graft failure (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.12-1.99; P  = 0.319 and hazard ratio 0.43; 95% CI, 0.11-1.73; P  = 0.235, respectively).

The utilization rate of Mas30 grafts increases with MP without detriment to graft survival. This early experience may have implications for increasing the available donor pool of Mas30 livers.

The agonal phase can vary following treatment withdrawal in donor after circulatory death (DCD). There is little evidence to support when procurement teams should stand down in relation to donor time to death (TTD). We assessed what impact TTD had on outcomes following DCD liver transplantation.

Data were extracted from the UK Transplant Registry on DCD liver transplant recipients from 2006 to 2021. TTD was the time from withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment to asystole, and functional warm ischemia time was the time from donor systolic blood pressure and/or oxygen saturation falling below 50 mm Hg and 70%, respectively, to aortic perfusion. The primary endpoint was 1-y graft survival. Potential predictors were fitted into Cox proportional hazards models. Adjusted restricted cubic spline models were generated to further delineate the relationship between TTD and outcome.

One thousand five hundred fifty-eight recipients of a DCD liver graft were included. Median TTD in the entire cohort was 13 min (interquartile range, 9-17 min). Restricted cubic splines revealed that the risk of graft loss was significantly greater when TTD ≤14 min. After 14 min, there was no impact on graft loss. Prolonged hepatectomy time was significantly associated with graft loss (hazard ratio, 1.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.83; P  = 0.003); however, functional warm ischemia time had no impact (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-2.27; P  > 0.9).

A very short TTD was associated with increased risk of graft loss, possibly because of such donors being more unstable and/or experiencing brain stem death as well as circulatory death. Expanding the stand down times may increase the utilization of donor livers without significantly impairing graft outcome.

Liver transplantation is the only life-saving procedure for children with end-stage liver disease. The field is however heterogenic with various graft types, recipient age, weight, and underlying diseases. Despite recently improved overall outcomes and the expanded use of living donors, waiting list mortality remains unacceptable, particularly in small children and infants. Based on the known negative effects of elevated donor age, higher body mass index, and prolonged cold ischemia time, the number of available donors for pediatric recipients is limited. Machine perfusion has regained significant interest in the adult liver transplant population during the last decade. Ten randomized controlled trials are published with an overall advantage of machine perfusion techniques over cold storage regarding postoperative outcomes, including graft survival. The concept of hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) was the first and only perfusion technique used for pediatric liver transplantation today. In 2018 the first pediatric candidate received a full-size graft donated after circulatory death with cold storage and HOPE, followed by a few split liver transplants after HOPE with an overall limited case number until today. One series of split procedures during HOPE was recently presented by colleagues from France with excellent results, reduced complications, and better graft survival. Such early experience paves the way for more systematic use of machine perfusion techniques for different graft types for pediatric recipients. Clinical reports of pediatric liver transplants with other perfusion techniques are awaited. Strong collaborative efforts are needed to explore the effect of perfusion techniques in this vulnerable population impacting not only the immediate posttransplant outcome but the development and success of an entire life.

Liver grafts from controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) donors have lower utilization rates due to inferior graft and patient survival rates, largely attributable to the increased incidence of ischemic cholangiopathy, when compared with grafts from brain dead donors (DBD). Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) may improve the quality of cDCD livers to allow for expansion of the donor pool, helping to alleviate the shortage of transplantable grafts. A systematic review and metanalysis was conducted comparing NRP cDCD livers with both non-NRP cDCD livers and DBD livers. In comparison to non-NRP cDCD outcomes, NRP cDCD grafts had lower rates of ischemic cholangiopathy [RR = 0.23, 95% CI (0.11, 0.49), p = 0.0002], primary non-function [RR = 0.51, 95% CI (0.27, 0.97), p = 0.04], and recipient death [HR = 0.5, 95% CI (0.36, 0.69), p < 0.0001]. There was no difference in outcomes between NRP cDCD donation compared to DBD liver donation. In conclusion, NRP improved the quality of cDCD livers compared to their non-NRP counterparts. NRP cDCD livers had similar outcomes to DBD grafts. This provides further evidence supporting the continued use of NRP in cDCD liver transplantation and offers weight to proposals for its more widespread adoption.

The aims of this narrative review were (i) to describe the current indications of SLKT, (ii) to report evolution of SLKT activity, (iii) to report the outcomes of SLKT, (iv) to explain the immune-protective effect of liver transplant on kidney transplant, (v) to explain the interest of delay kidney transplantation, using hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP), (vi) to report kidney after liver transplantation (KALT) indications and (vii) to describe the value of the increase in the use of extended criteria donors (ECD) and particular controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) transplant, thanks to the development of new organ preservation strategies.

Electronic databases were screened using the keywords "Simultaneous", "Combined", "kidney transplantation" and "liver transplantation". The methodological and clinical heterogeneity of the included studies meant that meta-analysis was inappropriate.

 A total of 1,917 publications were identified in the literature search. Two reviewers screened all study abstracts independently and 1,107 of these were excluded. Thus, a total of 79 full text articles were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 21 were excluded. In total, 58 studies were included in this systematic review.

 Simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation has made a significant contribution for patients with dual-organ disease. The optimization of indication and selection of SLKT patients will reduce futile transplantation. Moreover, increasing the use of transplants from extended criteria donors, in particular cDCD, should be encouraged, thanks to the development of new modalities of organ preservation.

Donor risk factors and events surrounding donation impact the quantity and quality of grafts generated to meet liver transplant waitlist demands. Donor interventions represent an opportunity to mitigate injury and risk factors within donors themselves. The purpose of this review is to describe issues to address among donation after brain death, donation after circulatory determination of death, and living donors directly, for the sake of optimizing relevant outcomes among donors and recipients.

Studies on donor management practices and high-level evidence supporting specific interventions are scarce. Nonetheless, for donation after brain death (DBD), critical care principles are employed to correct cardiocirculatory compromise, impaired tissue oxygenation and perfusion, and neurohormonal deficits. As well, certain treatments as well as marginally prolonging duration of brain death among otherwise stable donors may help improve posttransplant outcomes. In donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD), interventions are performed to limit warm ischemia and reverse its adverse effects. Finally, dietary and exercise programs have improved donation outcomes for both standard as well as overweight living donor (LD) candidates, while minimally invasive surgical techniques may offer improved outcomes among LD themselves.

Donor interventions represent means to improve liver transplant yield and outcomes of liver donors and grafts.

Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) is an emerging recovery modality for transplantable allografts from controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) donors. In the US, only 11.4% of liver recipients who are transplanted from a deceased donor receive a cDCD liver. NRP has the potential to safely expand the US donor pool with improved transplant outcomes as compared with standard super rapid recovery (SRR).

To assess outcomes of US liver transplants using controlled donation after circulatory death livers recovered with normothermic regional perfusion vs standard super rapid recovery.

This was a retrospective, observational cohort study comparing liver transplant outcomes from cDCD donors recovered by NRP vs SRR. Outcomes of cDCD liver transplant from January 2017 to May 2023 were collated from 17 US transplant centers and included livers recovered by SRR and NRP (thoracoabdominal NRP [TA-NRP] and abdominal NRP [A-NRP]). Seven transplant centers used NRP, allowing for liver allografts to be transplanted at 17 centers; 10 centers imported livers recovered via NRP from other centers.

cDCD livers were recovered by either NRP or SRR.

The primary outcome was ischemic cholangiopathy (IC). Secondary end points included primary nonfunction (PNF), early allograft dysfunction (EAD), biliary anastomotic strictures, posttransplant length of stay (LOS), and patient and graft survival.

A total of 242 cDCD livers were included in this study: 136 recovered by SRR and 106 recovered by NRP (TA-NRP, 79 and A-NRP, 27). Median (IQR) NRP and SRR donor age was 30.5 (22-44) years and 36 (27-49) years, respectively. Median (IQR) posttransplant LOS was significantly shorter in the NRP cohort (7 [5-11] days vs 10 [7-16] days; P < .001). PNF occurred only in the SRR allografts group (n = 2). EAD was more common in the SRR cohort (123 of 136 [56.1%] vs 77 of 106 [36.4%]; P = .007). Biliary anastomotic strictures were increased 2.8-fold in SRR recipients (7 of 105 [6.7%] vs 30 of 134 [22.4%]; P = .001). Only SRR recipients had IC (0 vs 12 of 133 [9.0%]; P = .002); IC-free survival by Kaplan-Meier was significantly improved in NRP recipients. Patient and graft survival were comparable between cohorts.

There was comparable patient and graft survival in liver transplant recipients of cDCD donors recovered by NRP vs SRR, with reduced rates of IC, biliary complications, and EAD in NRP recipients. The feasibility of A-NRP and TA-NRP implementation across multiple US transplant centers supports increasing adoption of NRP to improve organ use, access to transplant, and risk of wait-list mortality.

The last decade has been notable for increasing high-quality research and dramatic improvement in outcomes with dynamic liver preservation. Robust evidence from numerous randomized controlled trials has been pooled by meta-analyses, providing the highest available evidence on the protective effect of machine perfusion (MP) over static cold storage in liver transplantation (LT). Based on a protective effect with less complications and improved graft survival, the field has seen a paradigm shift in organ preservation. This editorial focuses on the role of MP in LT and how it could become the new "gold standard". Strong collaborative efforts are needed to explore its effects on long-term outcomes.

Thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) following cardiac death is an emerging multivisceral organ procurement technique. Recent national studies on outcomes of presumptive TA-NRP-procured organs are limited by potential misclassification since TA-NRP is not differentiated from donation after cardiac death (DCD) in registry data.

We studied 22 donors whose designees consented to TA-NRP and organ procurement performed at our institution between January 20, 2020 and July 3, 2022. We identified these donors in SRTR to describe organ utilization and recipient outcomes and compared them to recipients of traditional DCD (tDCD) and donation after brain death (DBD) organs during the same timeframe.

All 22 donors progressed to cardiac arrest and underwent TA-NRP followed by heart, lung, kidney, and/or liver procurement. Median donor age was 41 years, 55% had anoxic brain injury, 45% were hypertensive, 0% were diabetic, and median kidney donor profile index was 40%. TA-NRP utilization was high across all organ types (88%-100%), with a higher percentage of kidneys procured via TA-NRP compared to tDCD (88% vs. 72%, p = .02). Recipient and graft survival ranged from 89% to 100% and were comparable to tDCD and DBD recipients (p ≥ .2). Delayed graft function was lower for kidneys procured from TA-NRP compared to tDCD donors (27% vs. 44%, p = .045).

Procurement from TA-NRP donors yielded high organ utilization, with outcomes comparable to tDCD and DBD recipients across organ types. Further large-scale study of TA-NRP donors, facilitated by its capture in the national registry, will be critical to fully understand its impact as an organ procurement technique.

Since the advent of University of Wisconsin preservation solution in the 1980s, clinicians have learned to work within its confines. While affording improved outcomes, considerable limitations still exist and contribute to the large number of livers that go unused each year, often for fear they may never work. The last 10 years have seen the widespread availability of new perfusion modalities which provide an opportunity for assessing organ viability and prolonged organ storage. This review will discuss the role of in situ normothermic regional perfusion for livers donated after circulatory death. It will also describe the different modalities of ex situ perfusion, both normothermic and hypothermic, and discuss how they are thought to work and the opportunities afforded by them.

Given the current severe shortage of available livers for transplantation, there is an urgent need to maximize the utilization of donor organs. One of the strategies to increase the number of available livers for transplantation is to improve organ utilization through the use of elderly, overweight, or organs donated after circulatory death. However, the utilization of these "marginal" organs was associated with an increased risk of early allograft dysfunction, primary nonfunction, ischemic biliary complications, or even re-transplantation. Ischemia-reperfusion injury is a key mechanism in the pathogenesis of these complications.

Heart transplantation using donation after circulatory death (DCD) was recently adopted in the United States. This study aimed to characterize organ yield from adult (≥18 years) DCD heart donors in the United States using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry. The registry does not identify potential donors who do not progress to circulatory death, and only those who progressed to death were included for analysis. Outcomes included organ recovery from the donor operating room and organ utilization for transplant. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify predictors of heart recovery and utilization. Among 558 DCD procurements, recovery occurred in 89.6%, and 92.5% of recovered hearts were utilized for transplant. Of 506 DCD procurements with available data, 65.0% were classified as direct procurement and perfusion and 35.0% were classified as normothermic regional perfusion (NRP). Logistic regression identified that NRP, shorter agonal time, younger donor age, and highest volume of organ procurement organizations were independently associated with increased odds for heart recovery. NRP independently predicted heart utilization after recovery. DCD heart utilization in the United States is satisfactory and consistent with international experience. NRP procurements have a higher yield for DCD heart transplantation compared with direct procurement and perfusion, which may reflect differences in donor assessment and acceptance criteria.

Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) and hypothermic-oxygenated-perfusion (HOPE), were both shown to improve outcomes after liver transplantation from donors after circulatory death (DCD). Comparative clinical and mechanistical studies are however lacking.

A rodent model of NRP and HOPE, both in the donor, was developed. Following asystolic donor warm ischemia time (DWIT), the abdominal compartment was perfused either with a donor-blood-based-perfusate at 37 °C (NRP) or with oxygenated Belzer-MPS at 10 °C (donor-HOPE) for 2 h. Livers were then procured and underwent 5 h static cold storage (CS), followed by transplantation. Un-perfused and HOPE-treated DCD-livers (after CS) and healthy livers (DBD) with direct implantation after NRP served as controls. Endpoints included the entire spectrum of ischemia-reperfusion-injury.

Healthy control livers (DBD) showed minimal signs of inflammation during 2 h NRP and achieved 100% posttransplant recipient survival. In contrast, DCD livers with 30 and 60 min DWIT suffered from greater mitochondrial injury and inflammation as measured by increased perfusate Lactate, FMN- and HMGB-1-levels with subsequent Toll-like-receptor activation during NRP. In contrast, donor-HOPE (instead of NRP) led to significantly less mitochondrial-complex-I-injury and inflammation. Results after donor-HOPE were comparable to ex-situ HOPE after CS. Most DCD-liver recipients survived when treated with one HOPE-technique (86%), compared to only 40% after NRP (p = 0.0053). Following a reduction of DWIT (15 min), DCD liver recipients achieved comparable survivals with NRP (80%).

High-risk DCD livers benefit more from HOPE-treatment, either immediately in the donor or after cold storage. Comparative prospective clinical studies are required to translate the results.

Funding was provided by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no: 32003B-140776/1, 3200B-153012/1, 320030-189055/1, and 31IC30-166909) and supported by University Careggi (grant no 32003B-140776/1) and the OTT (grant No.: DRGT641/2019, cod.prog. 19CT03) and the Max Planck Society. Work in the A.G. laboratory was partially supported by the NIH R01NS112381 and R21NS125466 grants.

Livers from controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) with very prolonged warm ischemic time (WIT) are regularly transplanted after abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (aNRP) plus ex-situ machine perfusion (MP). Considering aNRP as in-situ MP, we investigated whether the results of a pilot experience of extended criteria cDCD liver transplantation (LT) with prolonged WIT, with aNRP alone, were comparable to the best possible outcomes in low-risk cDCD LT.

Prospectively collected data on 24 cDCD LT, with aNRP alone, were analyzed.

The median total and asystolic WIT were 51 and 25 min. Measures within benchmark cut-offs were: median duration of surgery (5.9 h); median intraoperative transfusions (3 units of red blood cells); need for renal replacement therapy (2/24 patients); median intensive care stay (3 days); key complications; overall morbidity, graft loss, and retransplantation up to 12 months; 12-month mortality (2/21 patients). The median hospital stay (33 days, due to logistics) and mortality up to 6 months (2/24 patients, due to graft-unrelated causes) exceeded benchmark thresholds.

This pilot experience suggests that livers from cDCD with very prolonged WIT that appear viable during adequate quality aNRP may be safely transplanted, with no need for ex-situ MP, with considerable resource savings.

United States transplant centers have low rates of liver allograft utilization from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors. Prolonged functional donor warm ischemic time (f-DWIT) is associated with worse outcomes; however, center practices regarding f-DWIT are unclear. As emerging technologies are changing the landscape of DCD liver transplantation, this study aims to gain insights into the practices of US centers around DCD liver allograft utilization.

An electronic survey was distributed to transplant surgeons at US transplant centers from May to July 2022.

Responses were received from 108 transplant surgeons, of which, 44.4% reported their center's annual DCD liver transplant volume as <10%, and 40.7% reported volumes of 10% to 30%. Warm ischemic time (WIT) was the principal donor variable considered by accepting surgeons (72.2%). Center definition of f-DWIT varied widely, with at least 14 definitions being used. Nearly half of the surgeons (48.6%) defined f-DWIT as time from systolic blood pressure (SBP) <80 mm Hg or oxygen saturation (Sp02) <80% to flush; 21.5% defined f-DWIT as ≤30 minutes from withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy to flush. Nearly 13% of centers use normothermic machine perfusion for most of their DCD liver allografts. More than half of surgeons transplanted at least 1 DCD liver allograft recovered after normothermic regional perfusion.

Differences in the definition of f-DWIT and acceptance patterns of DCD liver allografts limit the ability to evaluate patient and allograft outcomes. As the DCD landscape is evolving, consensus definitions and granular databases can improve the transplant community's ability to evaluate outcome data and utilization from DCD liver allografts.

Abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (A-NRP) allows in-situ reperfusion and recovery of abdominal organs metabolism in donors after circulatory death (DCD). Besides improving liver transplantation outcomes, liver injury and function can be assessed during A-NRP.

To refine liver viability assessment during A-NRP, prospectively collected data of controlled DCD donors managed at our Institution between October 2019 and May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline characteristics, procedural variables and A-NRP parameters of donors whose liver was successfully transplanted were compared to those of donors whose liver was discarded.

Twenty-seven donors were included and in 20 (74%) the liver was accepted (positive outcome). No differences between study groups were observed concerning baseline characteristics and warm ischemia times (WIT). Initial lactate levels were positively correlated with functional WIT (r2  = 0.4, p = 0.04), whereas transaminase levels were not. Blood flow during A-NRP was comparable, whereas oxygen consumption (VO2 ) was significantly higher in the positive outcome group after 1 h. Time courses of lactate, AST and ALT were significantly different between study groups (p < 0.001). Donors whose liver was accepted showed faster lactate clearance, a difference which was amplified by normalizing lactate clearance to oxygen delivery (DO2 ) and VO2 . Lactate clearance was correlated to transaminase levels and DO2 -normalized lactate clearance was the parameter best discriminating between study groups.

DO2 -normalized lactate clearance may represent an element of liver viability assessment during A-NRP.

Liver transplantation is the only chance of cure for people with end-stage liver disease and some people with advanced liver cancers or acute liver failure. The increasing prevalence of these conditions drives demand and necessitates the increasing use of donated livers which have traditionally been considered suboptimal. Several novel machine perfusion preservation technologies have been developed, which attempt to ameliorate some of the deleterious effects of ischaemia reperfusion injury. Machine perfusion technology aims to improve organ quality, thereby improving outcomes in recipients of suboptimal livers when compared to traditional static cold storage (SCS; ice box).

To evaluate the effects of different methods of machine perfusion (including hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE), normothermic machine perfusion (NMP), controlled oxygenated rewarming, and normothermic regional perfusion) versus each other or versus static cold storage (SCS) in people undergoing liver transplantation.

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 10 January 2023.

We included randomised clinical trials which compared different methods of machine perfusion, either with each other or with SCS. Studies comparing HOPE via both hepatic artery and portal vein, or via portal vein only, were grouped. The protocol detailed that we also planned to include quasi-randomised studies to assess treatment harms.

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. overall participant survival, 2. quality of life, and 3. serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes were 4. graft survival, 5. ischaemic biliary complications, 6. primary non-function of the graft, 7. early allograft function, 8. non-serious adverse events, 9. transplant utilisation, and 10. transaminase release during the first week post-transplant. We assessed bias using Cochrane's RoB 2 tool and used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence.

We included seven randomised trials (1024 transplant recipients from 1301 randomised/included livers). All trials were parallel two-group trials; four compared HOPE versus SCS, and three compared NMP versus SCS. No trials used normothermic regional perfusion. When compared with SCS, it was uncertain whether overall participant survival was improved with either HOPE (hazard ratio (HR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 1.98; P = 0.81, I2 = 0%; 4 trials, 482 recipients; low-certainty evidence due to imprecision because of low number of events) or NMP (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.31 to 3.80; P = 0.90; 1 trial, 222 recipients; very low-certainty evidence due to imprecision and risk of bias). No trials reported quality of life. When compared with SCS alone, HOPE was associated with improvement in the following clinically relevant outcomes: graft survival (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.87; P = 0.02, I2 = 0%; 4 trials, 482 recipients; high-certainty evidence), serious adverse events in extended criteria DBD liver transplants (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.91; P = 0.03, I2 = 0%; 2 trials, 156 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and clinically significant ischaemic cholangiopathy in recipients of DCD livers (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.92; P = 0.03; 1 trial, 156 recipients; high-certainty evidence). In contrast, NMP was not associated with improvement in any of these clinically relevant outcomes. NMP was associated with improved utilisation compared with SCS (one trial found a 50% lower rate of organ discard; P = 0.008), but the reasons underlying this effect are unknown. We identified 11 ongoing studies investigating machine perfusion technologies.

In situations where the decision has been made to transplant a liver donated after circulatory death or donated following brain death, end-ischaemic HOPE will provide superior clinically relevant outcomes compared with SCS alone. Specifically, graft survival is improved (high-certainty evidence), serious adverse events are reduced (moderate-certainty evidence), and in donors after circulatory death, clinically relevant ischaemic biliary complications are reduced (high-certainty evidence). There is no good evidence that NMP has the same benefits over SCS in terms of these clinically relevant outcomes. NMP does appear to improve utilisation of grafts that would otherwise be discarded with SCS; however, the reasons for this, and whether this effect is specific to NMP, is not clear. Further studies into NMP viability criteria and utilisation, as well as head-to-head trials with other perfusion technologies are needed. In the setting of donation following circulatory death transplantation, further trials are needed to assess the effect of these ex situ machine perfusion methods against, or in combination with, normothermic regional perfusion.

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver allografts are associated with higher rates of primary non-function (PNF) and ischemic cholangiopathy (IC). Advanced recovery techniques, including thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP), may improve organ utilization and patient and allograft outcomes. Given the increasing US experience with TA-NRP DCD recovery, we evaluated outcomes of DCD liver allografts transplanted after TA-NRP.

Liver allografts transplanted from DCD donors after TA-NRP were identified from 5/1/2021 to 1/31/2022 across 8 centers. Donor data included demographics, functional warm ischemic time (fWIT), total warm ischemia time (tWIT) and total time on TA-NRP. Recipient data included demographics, model of end stage liver disease (MELD) score, etiology of liver disease, PNF, cold ischemic time (CIT), liver function tests, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS), post-operative transplant related complications.

The donors' median age was 32 years old and median BMI was 27.4. Median fWIT was 20.5 min; fWIT exceeded 30 min in two donors. Median time to initiation of TA-NRP was 4 min and median time on bypass was 66 min. The median recipient listed MELD and MELD at transplant were 22 and 21, respectively. Median allograft CIT was 292 min. The median length of follow up was 257 days. Median ICU and hospital LOS were 2 and 7 days, respectively. Three recipients required management of anastomotic biliary strictures. No patients demonstrated IC, PNF or required re-transplantation.

Liver allografts from TA-NRP DCD donors demonstrated good early allograft and recipient outcomes.

Livers from donations after circulatory death (DCDs) are very sensitive to ischemia/reperfusion injury and thus need careful reconditioning, such as normothermic regional perfusion (NRP). So far, its impact on DCDs has not been thoroughly investigated. This pilot cohort study aimed to explore the NRP impact on liver function by evaluating dynamic changes of circulating markers and hepatic gene expression in 9 uncontrolled DCDs (uDCDs) and 10 controlled DCDs. At NRP start, controlled DCDs had lower plasma levels of inflammatory and liver damage markers, including α-glutathione s-transferase, sorbitol-dehydrogenase, malate dehydrogenase 1, liver-type arginase-1, and keratin-18, but higher levels of osteopontin, sFas, flavin mononucleotide, and succinate than uDCDs. During 4-hour NRP, some damage and inflammatory markers increased in both groups, while IL-6, HGF, and osteopontin increased only in uDCDs. At the NRP end, the tissue expression of early transcriptional regulators, apoptosis, and autophagy mediators was higher in uDCDs than in controlled DCDs. In conclusion, despite initial differences in liver damage biomarkers, the uDCD group was characterized by a major gene expression of regenerative and repair factors after the NRP procedure. Correlative analysis among circulating/tissue biomarkers and the tissue congestion/necrosis degree revealed new potential candidate biomarkers.

Standard US practice for donation after circulatory death (DCD) abdominal organ procurement is superrapid recovery (SRR). A newer approach using thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) shows promise for better recipient outcomes for all organs, but there are few reports of abdominal recipient outcomes from TA-NRP donors. We used the United Network for Organ Sharing data to identify all cardiac DCD donors from October 1, 2020, to May 20, 2022, and categorized them by recovery procedure (SRR vs TA-NRP). We then identified all liver, kidney, and pancreas recipients of these donors for whom 6-month outcome data were available and compared patient and graft survival, kidney delayed graft function (DGF), and biliary complications between TA-NRP DCD and SRR DCD organ recipients. Patient and graft survival did not differ significantly between groups for either kidney or liver recipients. Significantly fewer TA-NRP kidney recipients developed DGF (12.7% [15/118] vs 42.0% [84/200], P <.001), and TA-NRP and pumped kidneys had lower odds for DGF on multivariate analysis. No liver recipients in either group had biliary complications or were relisted for transplantation for ischemic cholangiopathy. Although long-term outcomes need to be investigated, our early results show similar outcomes for recipients of TA-NRP DCD abdominal organs versus recipients of SRR DCD abdominal organs. We believe that TA-NRP is an effective approach to expand the use of DCD organs.

Liver allograft steatosis is a significant risk factor for postoperative graft dysfunction and has been associated with inferior patient and graft survival, particularly in the case of moderate or severe macrovesicular steatosis. In recent years, the increasing incidence of obesity and fatty liver disease in the population has led to a higher proportion of steatotic liver grafts being used for transplantation, making the optimization of their preservation an urgent necessity. This review discusses the mechanisms behind the increased susceptibility of fatty livers to ischemia-reperfusion injury and provides an overview of the available strategies to improve their utilization for transplantation, with a focus on preclinical and clinical evidence supporting donor interventions, novel preservation solutions, and machine perfusion techniques.

In many countries, donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver grafts are used to overcome organ shortages; however, DCD grafts have been associated with an increased risk of complications and even graft loss after liver transplantation. The increased risk of complications is thought to correlate with prolonged functional donor warm ischaemia time. Stringent donor selection criteria and utilisation of in situ and ex situ organ perfusion technologies have led to improved outcomes. Additionally, the increased use of novel organ perfusion strategies has led to the possibility of reconditioning marginal DCD liver grafts. Moreover, these technologies enable the assessment of liver function before implantation, thus providing valuable data that can guide more precise graft-recipient selection. In this review, we first describe the different definitions of functional warm donor ischaemia time and its role as a determinant of outcomes after DCD liver transplantation, with a focus on the thresholds proposed for graft acceptance. Next, organ perfusion strategies, namely normothermic regional perfusion, hypothermic oxygenated perfusion, and normothermic machine perfusion are discussed. For each technique, clinical studies reporting on the transplant outcome are described, together with a discussion on the possible protective mechanisms involved and the functional criteria adopted for graft selection. Finally, we review multimodal preservation protocols involving a combination of more than one perfusion technique and potential future directions in the field.

Deceased donor livers are prone to biliary complications, which may necessitate retransplantation, and we, and others, have suggested that these complications are because of peribiliary vascular fibrin microthrombi. We sought to determine the prevalence and consequence of occult fibrin within deceased donor livers undergoing normothermic ex situ perfusion (NESLiP) and evaluate a role for fibrinolysis.

D-dimer concentrations, products of fibrin degradation, were assayed in the perfusate of 163 livers taken after 2 h of NESLiP, including 91 that were transplanted. These were related to posttransplant outcomes. Five different fibrinolytic protocols during NESLiP using alteplase were evaluated, and the transplant outcomes of these alteplase-treated livers were reviewed.

Perfusate D-dimer concentrations were lowest in livers recovered using in situ normothermic regional perfusion and highest in alteplase-treated livers. D-dimer release from donation after brain death livers was significantly correlated with the duration of cold ischemia. In non-alteplase-treated livers, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that D-dimer levels were associated with transplant survival ( P  = 0.005). Treatment with alteplase and fresh frozen plasma during NESLiP was associated with significantly more D-dimer release into the perfusate and was not associated with excess bleeding postimplantation; 8 of the 9 treated livers were free of cholangiopathy, whereas the ninth had a proximal duct stricture.

Fibrin is present in many livers during cold storage and is associated with poor posttransplant outcomes. The amount of D-dimer released after fibrinolytic treatment indicates a significant occult fibrin burden and suggests that fibrinolytic therapy during NESLiP may be a promising therapeutic intervention.

Liver graft utilization rates are a hot topic due to the worldwide organ shortage and the increasing number of transplant candidates on waiting lists. Liver perfusion techniques have been introduced in several countries, and may help to increase the organ supply, as they potentially enable the assessment of livers before use.

Liver offers were counted from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors (Maastricht type III) arising during the past decade in eight countries, including Belgium, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, and the US. Initial type-III DCD liver offers were correlated with accepted, recovered and implanted livers.

A total number of 34,269 DCD livers were offered, resulting in 9,780 liver transplants (28.5%). The discard rates were highest in the UK and US, ranging between 70 and 80%. In contrast, much lower DCD liver discard rates, e.g. between 30-40%, were found in Belgium, France, Italy, Spain and Switzerland. In addition, we observed large differences in the use of various machine perfusion techniques, as well as in graft and donor risk factors. For example, the median donor age and functional donor warm ischemia time were highest in Italy, e.g. >40 min, followed by Switzerland, France, and the Netherlands. Importantly, such varying risk profiles of accepted DCD livers between countries did not translate into large differences in 5-year graft survival rates, which ranged between 60-82% in this analysis.

Overall, DCD liver discard rates across the eight countries were high, although this primarily reflects the situation in the Netherlands, the UK and the US. Countries where in situ and ex situ machine perfusion strategies were used routinely had better DCD utilization rates without compromised outcomes.

A significant number of Maastricht type III DCD livers are discarded across Europe and North America today. The overall utilization rate among eight Western countries is 28.5% but varies significantly between 18.9% and 74.2%. For example, the median DCD-III liver utilization in five countries, e.g. Belgium, France, Italy, Switzerland, and Spain is 65%, in contrast to 24% in the Netherlands, UK and US. Despite this, and despite different rules and strategies for organ acceptance and preservation, 1- and 5-year graft survival rates remain fairly similar among all participating countries. A highly varying experience with modern machine perfusion technology was observed. In situ and ex situ liver perfusion concepts, and application of assessment tools for type-III DCD livers before transplantation, may be a key explanation for the observed differences in DCD-III utilization.

The introduction of pathways to enrol deceased donors after cardio-circulatory confirmation of death (donation after circulatory death, DCD) is expanding in many countries to face the shortage of organs for transplantation. The implementation of normothermic regional reperfusion (NRP) with warm oxygenated blood is a strategy to manage in-situ the organs of DCD donors. This approach, an alternative to in-situ cold preservation, and followed by prompt retrieval and cold static storage and/or ex-vivo machine perfusion (EVMP), could be limited to abdominal organs (A-NRP) or extended to the thorax (thoraco-abdominal, TA-NRP. NRP is also referred to as extracorporeal interval support for organ retrieval (EISOR). The use of EISOR is increasing in Europe, even if variably regulated. A-NRP has been demonstrated to be effective in decreasing the risk associated with transplantation of abdominal organs from DCD donors, and was recommended by the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) in a recent consensus document. We aim to explain how we select the candidates for DCD, to describe our regionalized model for implementing EISOR provision, and to introduce the health care professionals involved in this complex process, with their strictly defined roles, responsibilities, and boundaries. Finally, we report the results of our program, recruiting cDCD donors over a large network of hospitals, all pertaining to a Local Health Authority (Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale, AUSL) in Romagna, Italy.