Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) are rare and heterogeneous tumors arising from neuroendocrine cells, representing approximately 10 % of all Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. While most pNENs are sporadic, a subset is associated with genetic syndromes such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) or von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL). pNENs are further classified into functioning and non-functioning tumors, with distinct clinical behaviors, prognoses, and treatment approaches. This review explores genetic and environmental biomarkers that influence the risk, prognosis, and therapeutic responses in pNENs. The epidemiology of pNENs reveals an increasing incidence, primarily due to advancements in imaging techniques. Genetic factors play a pivotal role, with germline mutations in MEN1, VHL, and other genes contributing to familial pNENs. Somatic mutations, including alterations in the mTOR pathway and DNA maintenance genes such as DAXX and ATRX, are critical in sporadic pNENs. These mutations, along with epigenetic dysregulation and transcriptomic alterations, underpin the diverse clinical and molecular phenotypes of pNENs. Emerging evidence suggests that epigenetic changes, including DNA methylation profiles, can stratify pNEN subtypes and predict disease progression. Environmental and lifestyle factors, such as diabetes, smoking, and chronic pancreatitis, have been linked to an increased risk of sporadic pNENs. While the association between these factors and tumor progression is still under investigation, their potential role in influencing therapeutic outcomes warrants further study. Advances in systemic therapies, including somatostatin analogs, mTOR inhibitors, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have improved disease management. Biomarkers such as Ki-67, somatostatin receptor expression, and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status are being evaluated for their predictive value. Novel approaches, including the use of circulating biomarkers (NETest, circulating tumor cells, and ctDNA) and polygenic risk scores, offer promising avenues for non-invasive diagnosis and monitoring. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, including the need for large, well-annotated datasets and validated biomarkers. Future research should integrate multi-omics approaches and leverage liquid biopsy technologies to refine diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic strategies. Interdisciplinary collaborations and global consortia are crucial for overcoming current limitations and translating research findings into clinical practice. These insights hold promise for improving prevention, early detection, and tailored treatments, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.

Distinguishing grade 3 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) from neuroendocrine carcinomas (PanNECs) is sometimes challenging. Recently, a diffuse p16-positive pattern was reported in PanNECs but not in grade 3 PanNETs, suggesting that p16 could help differentiate these entities. This study aimed to investigate p16 expression in PanNETs of various grades and its association with clinicopathologic features.

A total of 114 PanNETs were selected, and their H&E resection slides were reviewed for pathologic features, with a focus on morphologic variants. Tissue microarrays were constructed, and p16 immunohistochemistry was performed. The results were categorized as diffuse positive, partial positive, or negative. Patient electronic health records were reviewed for follow-up data.

Among the 114 PanNETs reviewed, 13 (11.4%) exhibited diffuse p16 expression, 40 (35.1%) were negative, and 61 (53.5%) had partial expression. Diffuse p16 expression occurred in 6 of 38 (15.8%) grade 1, 6 of 60 (10.0%) grade 2, and 1 of 16 (6.3%) grade 3 tumors. Expression did not differ substantially with patient demographics, tumor size, grading, staging, or survival, but diffuse p16 expression was more frequent in body/tail tumors (12/65 [18.5%], P = .019) and in stromal-rich tumors (10/23 [43.5%], P < .001).

Diffuse p16 expression is not uncommon in PanNETs and may be associated with stroma-rich variants.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (panNEC) is a poorly differentiated, highly malignant neoplasm with an extremely poor prognosis. This tumor often presents as locally advanced or unresectable at the initial diagnosis.

A 72-year-old woman presented to our hospital with weight loss. A computed tomography scan showed an enhanced tumor measuring 32 mm in the pancreatic head region, with contact to the common hepatic artery over 180°. The pathological findings from the specimens obtained via endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration identified small cell-type NEC with extensive necrosis, leading to a diagnosis of locally advanced unresectable panNEC. Accordingly, she began a course of carboplatin and etoposide therapy. After 7 courses, given the significant shrinkage of the tumor, we performed a pancreatoduodenectomy as a conversion surgery. Pathological examination revealed a localized, residual nodule of NEC, consisting mainly of large neoplastic cells, with carcinoma in situ components scattered within and around the nodule. In addition, the diffuse membrane expression of somatostatin receptor 2 was observed in NEC components. Each component showed the same type of KRAS mutation (p.G12V) and was considered to originate from a single primary tumor in the pancreas. She received 3 courses of the same regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy and has remained recurrence-free for 24 months.

This is a rare case of successful conversion surgery for locally advanced, unresectable panNEC after chemotherapy, providing several important histopathological and molecular insights.

The classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms has evolved significantly. In the current World Health Organization (WHO) classification, well-differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (G3-NETs) are distinguished from poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) based on morphology despite using the same proliferation indices, which poses diagnostic challenges. This review aims to assist pathologists in making an accurate diagnosis, which is crucial for patient management as G3-NETs and NECs have different prognoses and chemotherapy responses.

A literature review and meta-analyses were conducted to summarize current knowledge of G3-NETs and NECs, focusing on histopathologic and genetic characteristics.

Grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors and NECs are distinct entities with differences in histopathology, genetics, and clinical presentations. Grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors have a lower Ki-67 proliferation index and tumor mutational burden compared to NECs. Distinct gene mutations and pathways have been identified in G3-NETs and NECs, offering potential for developing a diagnostic gene panel. The 2022 WHO classification recognizes the use of immunohistochemistry for somatostatin receptors 2/5, TP53, Rb, Menin, P27, ATRX, and DAXX to distinguish G3-NETs and NECs. In particular, TP53 and ATRX immunohistochemistry may be useful in routine diagnostics.

Specific immunohistochemistry and genetic tests should be developed and incorporated into the classification to reliably distinguish G3-NETs from NECs.

Extrapulmonary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (EP-SCNC) is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. Despite its morphological similarity to lung small cell carcinomas, its oncogenesis remains uncertain. One hundred and seventy-one EP-SCNC were enrolled in a multicenter study, and all tissue samples underwent an immunohistochemical p53 analysis. One hundred twenty-five samples were molecularly analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS), comprising DNA and RNA analysis. p53 normal/wild type expression was detected in 68 cases (39.8%), whereas aberrant expression was detected in 103 cases (60.2%). Molecular TP53 alteration was detected in 92 out of 125 tumors (73.6%). The TP53 mutation was shown to be prognostic and associated with shorter overall survival (p = 0.041). The multivariate analysis of p53 and TP53 mutational status found that it impacted overall survival relative to distinct sites of tumor locations (p = 0.004 and p = 0.001, respectively). Age did not influenced survival in the multivariate analysis of p53 and TP53 (p = 0.002; p < 0.001 resp.). Among tumors with paired immunohistochemical and molecular results, 108 exhibited concordance between the immunohistochemical and molecular analysis, whereas 17 were discordant. Accordingly, p53 aberrant expression was tightly associated with a TP53 mutation (p < 0.001). In discordant cases, molecular analysis revealed no alteration in three tumors with p53 overexpression. In contrast, in 14 tumors with wild-type p53 expression, TP53 genetic alteration was detected. Possible causes of discordance are discussed in this manuscript. Furthermore, the incidence of aberrant p53 expression / TP53 molecular alteration was noticeably lower in EP-SCNC than in small-cell lung carcinomas. Therefore, in EP-SCNC, other driver mutations should be sought since personalized therapy can improve patient prognosis.

Background: Neuroendocrine neoplasms are a rare and heterogeneous group of neoplasms. Small-sized (≤2 cm) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are of particular interest as they are often associated with aggressive behavior, with no specific prognostic or progression markers.

This article describes a clinical case characterized by a progressive growth of nonfunctional PanNET requiring surgical treatment in a patient with a germline FANCD2 mutation, previously not reported in PanNETs. The patient underwent whole exome sequencing and single-cell RNA sequencing.

The patient underwent surgical treatment. We confirmed the presence of the germline mutation FANCD2 and also detected the germline mutation WNT10A. The cellular composition of the PanNET was analyzed using single-cell sequencing, and the main cell clusters were identified. We analyzed the tumor genomics, and used the data to define the effect the germline FANCD2 mutation had.

Analysis of the mutational status of patients with PanNET may provide additional data that may influence treatment tactics, refine the plan for monitoring such patients, and provide more information about the pathogenesis of PanNET. PanNET research using scRNA-seq data may help in predicting the effect of therapy on neuroendocrine cells with FANCD2 mutations.

In this editorial, a comment on the article by Díaz-López et al published in the recent issue of the 2024 is provided. We focus on the practical implications critical for providing a correct and complete diagnosis of mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) in the gastrointestinal system. The diagnosis of MiNEN begins with the recognition of neuroendocrine features in one component of a biphasic tumor. The non-neuroendocrine counterpart can be virtually represented by any neoplastic type, even though the most frequent histologies are glandular and squamous. However, qualification of the neuroendocrine component requires histological and immunohistochemical confirmation. Neuroendocrine tumors are characterized by a peculiar architectural organization and bland nuclei with granular "salt and pepper" chromatin. Although neuroendocrine carcinomas have multiple and variable presentations, they typically show a solid or organoid architecture. The histological aspect needs to be confirmed by immunohistochemistry, and a diagnosis is confirmed whenever the expression of keratin and neuroendocrine markers is observed. Once both histopathological and immunohistochemical features of neuroendocrine neoplasms are identified, it is important to consider the three major pitfalls of MiNEN diagnostics: (1) Entrapment of neuroendocrine non-neoplastic cells within the tumor mass; (2) Differential diagnosis with amphicrine neoplasms; and (3) Differential diagnosis of tumors that partially express neuroendocrine markers. According to the current guidelines for diagnosing digestive MiNEN, each component must represent at least 30% of the entire neoplastic mass. Although the high-grade histopathological subtype frequently determines disease prognosis, both components can significantly affect prognosis. Thus, if one of the components, either neuroendocrine or non-neuroendocrine, does not fulfill the volumetric criteria, the guidelines still encourage reporting it. These strict criteria are essential for correctly recognizing and characterizing digestive MiNENs. This task is essential because it has prognostic relevance and substantial potential value for guiding further studies in this field. In the future, systematic analyses should be performed to validate or reconsider the current 30% cutoff value.

Gallbladder neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNEC) is indeed a relatively rare malignant tumor of the gallbladder with neuroendocrine differentiation and the ability to produce and secrete a number of neurotransmitters and hormones, characteristics that make its clinical presentation and biological behavior likely to be different from those of other types of gallbladder cancer. Current treatment mostly relies on surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

We report a 53-year-old middle-aged male patient who underwent radical surgery for gallbladder malignancy after a diagnosis of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder.

Diagnosis of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder based on the return of pathologic findings.

After local progression of postoperative chemotherapy with the first-line regimen of etoposide + cisplatin, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (traplizumab) + FOLIFIRI (fluorouracil + calcium folinate + irinotecan) regimen was used.

The patient achieved 20 months of clinical survival and ultimately died of myelosuppression.

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors may become an effective tool in the treatment of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (GEP-NEC) is a rare group of diseases with poor prognosis and the assessment of its prognosis is a significant challenge. This study aimed to develop and validate a prognostic nomogram to assess overall survival (OS) in patients with GEP-NEC.

Patients diagnosed with poorly differentiated GEP-NEC were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2011 and 2015 and were randomly assigned to the training or validation cohort in a 7:3 ratio. The data included details of clinicopathological characteristics, therapeutic interventions and survival outcomes. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify independent prognostic factors. Nomogram was used to predict OS at 1 and 2 years. The nomogram was internally validated with validation cohort, and its predictive ability was evaluated using concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, decision curve analysis (DCA), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) index.

A total of 887 patients were divided into the training group (n=623) and the validation group (n=264). A total of 476 patients (53.66%) were in stage IV. Based on multivariate analysis, a nomogram was constructed with age, gender, N stage, tumor size, primary tumor resection, radiotherapy and chemotherapy (P<0.05). The C-index was 0.701 [95% confidential interval (CI): 0.677-0.725] and 0.731 (95% CI: 0.698-0.764) for the training and validation groups, respectively. The C-index, ROC, IDI and DCA results indicated that this nomogram model has a good predictive value.

In this study, a nomogram model based on seven independent prognostic factors provided visualization of the risk and could help clinicians predict the 1-year and 2-year OS for GEP-NEC. This tool can provide personalized survival predictions and improve clinical decision making for the management of GEP-NEC.

This article aims to illustrate the current state of investigations and management of liver metastases in patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are rising in incidence globally and have become the second most prevalent gastrointestinal malignancy in UK and USA. Frequently, patients have metastatic disease at time of presentation. The liver is the most common site of metastases for gastro-enteropancreatic NETs. Characterisation of liver metastases with imaging is important to ensure disease is not under-staged.

Magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography are now becoming standard of care for imaging liver metastases. There is an increasing armamentarium of therapies available for management of NETs and loco-regional therapy for liver metastases. The data supporting surgical and loco-regional therapy is reviewed with focus on role of liver transplantation. It is important to use appropriate imaging and classification of NET liver metastases. It is key that decisions regarding approach to treatment is undertaken in a multidisciplinary team and that individualised approaches are considered for management of patients with metastatic NETs.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are the second most prevalent neoplasms of the pancreas with variable prognosis and clinical course. Our knowledge of the genetic alterations in patients with pNETs has expanded in the past decade with the availability of whole-genome sequencing and germline testing. This review will focus on potential clinical applications of the genetic testing in patients with pNETs. For somatic testing, we discuss the commonly prevalent somatic mutations and their impact on prognosis and treatment of patients with pNET. We also highlight the relevant genomic biomarkers that predict response to specific treatments. Previously, germline testing was only recommended for high-risk patients with syndromic features (MEN1, VHL, TSC, and NF1), we review the evolving paradigm of germline testing in pNETs as recent studies have now shown that sporadic-appearing pNETs can also harbor germline variants.

Background: Although survival outcomes for neuroendocrine liver metastases (NETLM) are improved with liver-direct therapies (LDT), including hepatic debulking and nonsurgical trans-arterial embolization, the benefit is less established in the setting of concurrent extrahepatic disease (EHD). We performed a population-based study to characterize the rates of LDT being performed for NETLM with EHD patients and whether LDT is associated with survival outcomes. Methods: Patients with NETLM and EHD were identified using the California Cancer Registry database merged with data from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development between 2000 and 2012. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and survival outcomes were analyzed for these patients with and without LDT. Results: 327 NETLM patients with EHD were identified. EHD sites included lung, peritoneum, bone, and brain. A total of 71 (22%) of these patients underwent LDT. Compared to NETLM with EHD patients who did not undergo LDT, patients who received LDT had longer median overall survival (27 vs. 16 months, p = 0.006). Within the LDT group, 23 patients underwent liver resection. Liver resection was associated with longer median overall survival compared to nonsurgical LDT (138 vs. 13 months, p < 0.001). Conclusions: LDT candidacy should be determined for patients on a case-by-case basis, but the presence of EHD should not preclude LDT with appropriate patient selection.

Extrahepatic biliary neuroendocrine tumors (EBNETs) are rare. We aimed to characterize EBNETs including factors associated with survival.

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with EBNETs from 2004 to 2016. Patients who underwent resection were examined using Cox proportional hazards regression and the Kaplan-Meier method. We compared overall survival (OS) among patients with EBNETs to those with NETs from other primary sites.

Overall, 223 patients with EBNETs were identified. Patients were predominantly male (n = 113, 50.7 %), white (n = 177, 79.4 %) and presented without distant metastasis (n = 182, 81.6 %). The majority underwent operation (n = 127, 57.9 %) with resection of the primary tumor (n = 89, 70 %). Among patients who underwent resection (n = 71), multivariable regression demonstrated older age (HR 1.11, 95 % C.I. 1.04-1.17), lymph node metastases (HR 1.19, 95 % C.I. 1.02-1.38) and poorly/undifferentiated tumors [HR 22.3, 95 % C.I. 3.78-131]) were associated with worse overall survival. Patients with EBNETs experienced abbreviated OS compared to patients with small bowel or pancreas NETs (p < 0.001), but improved OS when compared to patients with gallbladder NETs (p = 0.001).

Tumor differentiation and lymph node status significantly impact overall survival.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are uncommon tumors that develop from specialized endocrine cells. Thyroid medullary carcinoma, phaeochromocytomas, pituitary tumors, carcinoid, and gastroenteropancreatic NET are just a few examples of the diverse group known as NET. In recent times, they have garnered significant interest due to their ease of palliation and ability to reveal the long-term impact of the specific hormone raised. Neuroendocrine indicators, particularly chromogranin A, are very helpful in the diagnostic process. Accurate biomarkers that can be employed for NET diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up, therapy stratification, and treatment response evaluation are greatly needed. Due to the great diversity of neuroendocrine neoplasms, particular biomarkers must be developed in order to diagnose, treat, and identify them. The several NET biomarkers covered in this review will aid in the fight against this uncommon illness.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are relatively uncommon heterogeneous neoplasms arising from endocrine and neuronal origin cells showing highly variable clinical behavior. By the time these tumors are discovered, up to 14% of patients with histologically proven NETs have metastasis, with the liver as the most frequently affected organ. Sometimes, no known primary site can be identified via routine imaging. Neuroendocrine tumors of unknown origin carry a poorer prognosis (compared with metastatic NETs with a known primary site) because of a lack of tailored surgical intervention and appropriate medical therapy (eg, chemotherapy or targeted therapy). A multimethod approach is frequently used in the trial to accurately determine the primary site for NETs of unknown primary sites and may include clinical, laboratory, radiological, histopathological, and surgical data. New molecular techniques using the genomic approach to identify the molecular signature have shown promising results. Various imaging modalities include ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), dual-energy CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and functional and hybrid imaging (positron emission tomography/CT, positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging); somatostatin receptor imaging with new tracers is frequently used in an attempt for localization of the primary site.

Background and Objectives: High-grade malignant neuroendocrine tumors (G3 NETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are characterized by rapid proliferation, high metastatic capacity, and strong expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs). We aimed to analyze the presence of SSTRs in NET G3 and NEC, and to correlate their expression with the use of octreotide and pasireotide. Materials and Methods: For this purpose, we first performed a retrospective study of G3 NET and NEC patients, which included the determination of SSTR expression and response to octreotide treatment. Second, we selected the H69 small cell lung cancer cell line to determine the effect of octreotide and pasireotide. Results: Our results showed the traditional somatostatin analog (SSA) octreotide was ineffective in patients with NET G3 and NEC. On the other hand, RT-qPCR showed a high expression of SSTR2 and SSTR5 in H69 cells. Interestingly, while octreotide did not modify H69 cell proliferation, a strong inhibition of proliferation was detected with the use of pasireotide. Conclusions: In view of these results, a clinical trial in NET G3 and NEC patients using pasireotide is necessary to determine the usefulness of this drug in improving patient treatment.

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are a heterogeneous group of malignant neoplasms that can settle in the gastroenteropancreatic tract. They are composed of a neuroendocrine (NE) and a non-NE component in at least 30% of each tumour. The non-NE component can include different histological combinations of glandular, squamous, mucinous and sarcomatoid phenotypes, and one or both of the components can be low-or high grade malignant. Recent changes in the nomenclature of these neoplasms might lead to great deal of confusion, and the lack of specific clinical trials is the main reason why their management is difficult. The review aims to clarify the definition of MiNEN and analyze available evidence about their diagnosis and treatment options according to their location and extension through careful analysis of the available data. It would be important to reach a general consensus on their diagnosis in order to construct a classification that remains stable over time and facilitates the design of clinical trials that, due to their low incidence, will require long recruitment periods.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) represents a cornerstone of treatment regimens for patients with low proliferative neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, in patients experiencing somatostatin receptor-positive NET with higher proliferation rates, a value and potential therapeutic benefit of PRRT as part of multimodal treatment approaches and potentially with addition of radiosensitizing agents has not yet been established.

In this study, 20 patients with histologically confirmed gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NET with proliferation rates (Ki67) between 15% and 55% were treated either with PRRT only (n = 10) or with a combination therapy (n = 10) comprising PRRT and capecitabine/temozolomide (CAP/TEM) for at least 2 consecutive cycles.

Disease control rate in patients treated with PRRT alone was 60% (40% stable disease and 20% partial response). Strikingly, in patients treated with PRRT in combination with radiosensitization (CAP/TEM), the disease control rate was 90% (20% stable disease and 70% partial response). The median progression-free survival in the PRRT only group was 12 months, whereas the median progression-free survival in the PRRT + CAP/TEM group was 26 months and has not been yet reached for all patients in the group during the observation period. The median disease-specific survival for patients with PRRT alone was 51 months, whereas this end point was not yet reached in the PRRT + CAP/TEM group. Moreover, the PRRT + CAP/TEM group showed a significantly higher reduction of SSTR-PET-based metabolic tumor volume and chromogranin A levels compared with the PRRT only group. Importantly, adverse events of all grades did not differ between both groups.

PRRT + CAP/TEM represents a highly promising and well-tolerated therapeutic regimen for patients experiencing somatostatin receptor-positive NET with higher (Ki67 ≥ 15%) proliferation rate. Prospective randomized clinical trials are warranted.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) are rare pancreatic malignant tumors, and comprehensive gene analyses are scarce. In this study, six NECs and six MiNENs were collected, immunohistochemistry for synaptophysin, chromogranin A, INSM1, Ki-67, and Rb was conducted, and KRAS mutational status was examined. Among these cases, comprehensive gene expression analysis of oncogene pathways using nCounter® were performed with six NECs and four MiNENs, and those data were compared with that of three pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs), with that of three normal pancreatic ducts, and with each other. By dividing NEC and MiNEN cases into KRAS-mutated group and KRAS-wild group, the difference of clinicopathological data and gene expression profiling data were examined between the two groups. Compared to the data of normal pancreatic epithelium, all 13 cancer-related pathways were upregulated in PDAC, MiNEN, and NEC group with more upregulation in this order. Compared to the data of PDAC, genes of DNA Damage repair pathway was most upregulated both in NECs and MiNENs. Regarding the difference between KRAS-mutated and KRAS-wild groups, several genes were differentially expressed between the two, where MMP7 was the upregulated gene with highest p-value and NKD1 was the downregulated gene with highest p-value in KRAS-mutated group. From the extent of upregulation of 13 pathways, MiNEN was considered more progressed stage than PDAC, and NEC was considered more progressed than MiNEN. From the comparison of KRAS-mutated and KRAS-wild NECs and MiNENs, several differentially expressed genes were identified in this study.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are a rare and heterogenous group of tumors arising from neuroendocrine cells in multiple organs. Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) G3 encompass a small subgroup accounting for less than 10% of all neuroendocrine neoplasms. In contrast to NET G1 and G2 as well as neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), in NET G3 data on treatment and patient outcomes are still limited. Especially in a metastasized tumor stage, the role of surgery, peptide receptor radionucleotide therapy (PRRT), and systemic chemotherapy is not clearly defined.

In this real-life cohort, we consecutively analyzed clinical outcome in NET G3 patients receiving different diagnostic and treatment.

We found that even metastasized NET G3 patients undergoing surgery, or receiving radiation, somatostatin analogues (SSA), and PRRT showed a clear survival benefit. Interestingly, all treatment regimen were superior to classical chemotherapeutic agents. In addition, somatostatin receptor (SSTR) PET-CT, FDG PET-CT, and repetitive biopsies were shown to be useful diagnostic and prognostic tools in NET G3. Our study demonstrates that patients with highly proliferative NET G3 might benefit from less aggressive treatment modalities commonly used in low proliferative NEN.

This chapter explores the pathologic features of benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas. As pathologic classifications evolve particularly for cystic lesions and neuroendocrine tumors, it is important for physicians who treat patients with gastrointestinal malignance to fully evaluate these pathologic classifications.

Pancreatic carcinoma lacks effective therapeutic strategies resulting in poor prognosis. Transcriptional dysregulation due to alterations in KRAS and MYC affects initiation, development, and survival of this tumor type. Using patient-derived xenografts of KRAS- and MYC-driven pancreatic carcinoma, we show that coinhibition of topoisomerase 1 (TOP1) and bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) synergistically induces tumor regression by targeting promoter pause release. Comparing the nascent transcriptome with the recruitment of elongation and termination factors, we found that coinhibition of TOP1 and BRD4 disrupts recruitment of transcription termination factors. Thus, RNA polymerases transcribe downstream of genes for hundreds of kilobases leading to readthrough transcription. This occurs during replication, perturbing replisome progression and inducing DNA damage. The synergistic effect of TOP1 + BRD4 inhibition is specific to cancer cells leaving normal cells unaffected, highlighting the tumor's vulnerability to transcriptional defects. This preclinical study provides a mechanistic understanding of the benefit of combining TOP1 and BRD4 inhibitors to treat pancreatic carcinomas addicted to oncogenic drivers of transcription and replication.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) but metastases to the pancreas are very rare. There are only a few cases of isolated metastases of MCC to the pancreas. Because of this rarity, it can be wrongly diagnosed as a neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas(pNET), especially the poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (PNEC) subtype, in which the treatment is vastly different than that of MCC with isolated metastases of the pancreas.

An electronic search of the PubMed and google scholar databases was performed to obtain the literature on MCC with pancreatic metastases, using the following search terms: Merkel cell carcinoma, pancreas, and metastases. Results are limited to the following available article types: case reports and case series. We identified 45 cases of MCC with pancreatic metastases from the PubMed and Google Scholar database search and examined their potential relevance. Only 22 cases with isolated pancreatic metastases were taken for review including one case that we encountered.

The results from our review of cases of isolated pancreatic metastases of MCC were compared to the characteristics of the poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNEC). We found the following: (a) MCC with isolated pancreatic metastases occurred at an older age than PNEC and with male gender predominance (b) Most of the metastases occurred within 2 years of initial diagnosis of MCC (c) Resection of pancreatic mass was the first line treatment in case of resectable PNECs whereas resection of metastases was infrequently performed in MCC with pancreatic metastases.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), which are characterized by neuroendocrine differentiation, can arise in various organs. NENs have been divided into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) based on morphological differentiation, each of which has a distinct etiology, molecular profile, and clinicopathological features. While the majority of NECs originate in the pulmonary organs, extrapulmonary NECs occur most predominantly in the gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) system. Although platinum-based chemotherapy is the main therapeutic option for recurrent or metastatic GEP-NEC patients, the clinical benefits are limited and associated with a poor prognosis, indicating the clinically urgent need for effective therapeutic agents. The clinical development of molecular-targeted therapies has been hampered due to the rarity of GEP-NECs and the paucity of knowledge on their biology. In this review, we summarize the biology, current treatments, and molecular profiles of GEP-NECs based on the findings of pivotal comprehensive molecular analyses; we also highlight potent therapeutic targets for future precision medicine based on the most recent results of clinical trials.

High-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms are a rare disease entity and account for approximately 10% of all neuroendocrine neoplasms. Because of their rarity, there is an overall lack of prospectively collected data available to advise practitioners as to how best to manage these patients. As a result, best practices are largely based on expert opinion. Recently, a distinction was made between well-differentiated high-grade (G3) neuroendocrine tumors and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and with this, pathologic details, appropriate imaging practices and treatment have become more complex. In an effort to provide practitioners with the best guidance for the management of patients with high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, and gynecologic system, the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society convened a panel of experts to develop a set of recommendations and a treatment algorithm that may be used by practitioners for the care of these patients. Here, we provide consensus recommendations from the panel on pathology, imaging practices, management of localized disease, management of metastatic disease and surveillance and draw key distinctions as to the approach that should be utilized in patients with well-differentiated G3 neuroendocrine tumors vs poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas.

To date, single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy has proven to be ineffective against biomarker-unselected extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (EP-PDNECs). The efficacy of CPI in combination with chemotherapy remains under investigation.

Patients with advanced, progressive EP-PDNECs were enrolled in a two-part study of pembrolizumab-based therapy. In Part A, patients received pembrolizumab alone. In Part B, patients received pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy.

objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints: safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Tumours were profiled for programmed death-ligand 1 expression, microsatellite-high/mismatch repair deficient status, mutational burden (TMB), genomic correlates. Tumour growth rate was evaluated.

Part A (N = 14): ORR (pembrolizumab alone) 7% (95% CI, 0.2-33.9%), median PFS 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.7-21.4), median OS 7.8 months (95% CI, 3.1-not reached); 14% of patients (N = 2) had grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Part B (N = 22): ORR (pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy) 5% (95% CI, 0-22.8%), median PFS 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.9-3.4), median OS 4.8 months (95% CI, 4.1-8.2); 45% of patients (N = 10) had grade 3/4 TRAEs. The two patients with objective response had high-TMB tumours.

Treatment with pembrolizumab alone and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was ineffective in advanced, progressive EP-PDNECs.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03136055.

Chymotrypsin-like elastase family member 3B (CELA3B, elastase-3B) is a pancreatic enzyme with digestive function in the intestine. Since RNA analyses of normal tissues suggest that CELA3B expression is limited to the pancreas, the potential diagnostic utility of CELA3B immunohistochemistry for the distinction of pancreatic from extrapancreatic cancers and in the distinction of acinar cell carcinoma from ductal adenocarcinoma was assessed. CELA3B expression was successfully analyzed in 13,223 tumor samples from 132 different tumor types and subtypes as well as 8 samples each of 76 different normal tissue types by immunohistochemistry in a tissue microarray format (TMA). In normal tissues, CELA3B immunostaining was only seen in acinar cells and in a fraction of ductal cells of the pancreas as well as on some apical membranes of surface epithelial cells of the intestine. Among tumors, CELA3B immunostaining was seen in 12 of 16 (75%) acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas including 6 cases with strong staining (37.5%) as well as in 5 of 13,207 other tumors (0.04%). These included 1.2% of 91 adenoid cystic carcinomas, 1.2% of 246 mucoepidermoid carcinomas and 0.8% of 127 acinic cell carcinomas of salivary glands. Our data show a good sensitivity (75%) and a high specificity (99.9%) of CELA3B immunohistochemistry for diagnosing acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas.

Poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PDNEC), are a subtype of pancreatic cancer encompassing both small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma subtypes, and are characterized as distinct in terms of biology and prognosis compared to the more common pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Until recently, there has been a paucity of data on the genomic features of this cancer type. We describe a male patient diagnosed with PDNEC and extensive metastatic disease in the liver at diagnosis. Genomic analysis demonstrated a germline pathogenic variant in BRCA2 with somatic loss-of-heterozygosity of the BRCA2 wild-type allele. Following a favorable response to platinum-based chemotherapy (and the addition of immunotherapy), the patient received maintenance therapy with olaparib, which resulted in a further reduction on follow-up imaging (Fig. 1). After seventeen months of systemic control with olaparib, the patient developed symptomatic central nervous system metastases, which harboured a BRCA2 reversion mutation. No other sites of disease progression were observed. Herein, we report an exceptional outcome through the incorporation of a personalized management approach for a patient with a pancreatic PDNEC, guided by comprehensive genomic sequencing.

Tumors of mixed neuroendocrine and nonneuroendocrine histology are classified as collision, combined, or amphicrine and can occur in most organs, including the hepato-pancreato-biliary tract. Given the rarity of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) of the ampulla of Vater, the patient characteristics, management, and outcomes remain unclear. We sought to systematically review the worldwide literature on ampullary MANECs.

Eligible studies were identified through a systematic search of the MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases (end-of-search-date: January 5th, 2022), according to the PRISMA 2020 statement.

A total of 39 studies reporting on 56 patients with ampullary MANEC were included. The median age was 63.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 51.0-69.0) years and 55.6% were male (n = 25/45). Most had combined tumors (64.4%; n = 29/45), followed by collision (24.4%; n = 11/45), and amphicrine tumors (11.1%; n = 5/45). More than half had lymph node metastasis (56.8%; n = 25/44), yet only 7.9% had distant metastasis (n = 3/38). Tumor resection (i.e., mostly pancreaticoduodenectomy) was performed in 96.3% (n = 52/54), followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in 61.8% (n = 21/34). Nearly half experienced disease recurrence (47.2%; n = 17/36) over a median follow-up of 12.0 (IQR: 3.0-16.0) months, and 42.1% (n = 16/38) died over a median follow-up of 12.0 (IQR: 4.0-18.0) months. The most common cause of death was disease progression/recurrence in 81.3% (n = 13/16).

Early diagnosis and management of ampullary MANEC is challenging yet crucial to improve outcomes since many patients are diagnosed at an advanced disease stage and have unfavorable outcomes. Multicenter granular data are warranted to further understand and improve outcomes in these patients.

Although rarely curative, hepatic cytoreduction of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NETLM) is associated with improved symptom control and prolonged survival. Preoperative 68Ga DOTATATE and gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI can improve characterization of hepatic disease extent to improve surgical clearance, and resection of the primary tumor is associated with improved survival regardless of whether the liver metastases are treated. As parenchymal-sparing surgical techniques and the lowering of the debulking threshold have expanded the numbers of eligible NETLM patients for hepatic cytoreduction, we propose a new classification system to help guide surgical management. A multimodal approach that includes surgery, liver-directed therapies, and systemic therapies has improved outcomes and increased longevity for patients with well-differentiated metastatic NET.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with increasing incidence and an ill-defined pathobiology. Although many PanNETs are indolent and remain stable for years, a subset may behave aggressively and metastasize widely. Thus, the increasing and frequent detection of PanNETs presents a treatment dilemma. Current prognostic systems are susceptible to interpretation errors, sampling issues, and do not accurately reflect the clinical behavior of these neoplasms. Hence, additional biomarkers are needed to improve the prognostic stratification of patients diagnosed with a PanNET. Recent studies have identified alterations in death domain-associated protein 6 (DAXX) and alpha-thalassemia/mental retardation X-linked (ATRX), as well as alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT), as promising prognostic biomarkers. This review summarizes the identification, clinical utility, and specific nuances in testing for DAXX/ATRX by immunohistochemistry and ALT by telomere-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization in PanNETs. Furthermore, a discussion on diagnostic indications for DAXX, ATRX, and ALT status is provided to include the distinction between PanNETs and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (PanNECs), and determining pancreatic origin for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors in the setting of an unknown primary.

Mixed acinar neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas (MANEC-P) is an extremely rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. However, epidemiological estimates of MANEC-P remain unknown. This study aimed to estimate and compare the incidence, prevalence, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of MANEC-P in the United States (US). Patients with MANEC-P were identified through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and National Program of Cancer Registries databases between 2000-2017. The primary outcomes included age-adjusted incidence rate, limited-duration prevalence, and CSS. A total of 630 patients were identified for the incidence analysis and 149 for the prevalence and CSS analyses. The MANEC-P incidence rate was 0.011 per 100,000 individuals, which was the lowest among pancreatic cancer histologic subtypes. The incidence rate was significantly higher in men and Black races and peaked at 75-79 years of age. The incidence rate was the lowest in the midwestern region (0.009) and the highest in the northeastern US (0.013). The 17-year prevalence was 0.00005%, indicating that 189 patients were alive in the United States at the beginning of 2018. The median CSS of MANEC-P was estimated to be 41 (23, 69) months. In conclusion, MANEC-P is very rare, and its incidence rate has been steady in the US over the last two decades. MANEC-P has a poor prognosis and is the 5th leading cause of pancreatic cancer-related death in the US.

Most pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are slow-growing, and the patients may survive for many years, even after distant metastasis. The tumors usually display characteristic organoid growth patterns with typical neuroendocrine morphology. A smaller portion of the tumors follows a more precipitous clinical course. The classification has evolved from morphologic patterns to the current World Health Organization classification, with better-defined grading and prognostic criteria. Recent advances in molecular pathology have further improved our understanding of the pathogenesis of these tumors. Various issues and challenges remain, including the correct recognition of a neuroendocrine neoplasm, accurate classification and grading of the tumor, and differentiation from mimickers. This review focuses on the practical aspects during the workup of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and attempts to provide a general framework to help achieve an accurate diagnosis, classification, and grading.

Grade 3 (G3) gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare, aggressive tumors with poor prognosis. The World Health Organization 2017 and 2019 classifications further subdivided G3 NENs into G3 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Current guidelines favor medical management in most of these patients, and the role of surgical management is not well defined. We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of surgical management versus nonsurgical management for G3 GEP NENs.

A PRISMA-compliant systematic review of the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases (end-of-search date: 16 July 2021) was conducted. Individual patient survival data were reconstructed, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed.

Fourteen studies comprising 1810 surgical and 910 nonsurgical patients were systematically reviewed. Publication bias adjusted meta-analysis of 12 studies (1788 surgical and 857 nonsurgical patients) showed increased overall survival (OS) after surgical compared with nonsurgical management for G3 GEP NENs [hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.53]. Subgroup meta-analyses showed increased OS after surgical management for both pancreatic and gastrointestinal primary sites separately. In another subgroup meta-analysis of G3 GEP NETs (not NECs), surgical management was associated with increased OS compared with nonsurgical management (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11-0.61).

Surgical management of G3 GEP NENs may provide a potential survival benefit in well-selected cases. Further research is needed to define which patients will benefit most from surgical versus nonsurgical management. The current literature is limited by inconsistent reporting of survival outcomes in surgical versus nonsurgical groups, tumor grade, differentiation, primary tumor site, and selection criteria for surgical and nonsurgical management.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the colon, rectum and small intestine (SI) are increasing in incidence and prevalence. We evaluated the 5-year overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registry from 2000 to 2017 was accessed to identify patients with colonic, rectal, and SI NENs.

46,665 patients were diagnosed with NENs of the colon (n = 10,518, 22.5%), rectum (18,063, 38.7%), and SI (18,084, 38.8%). By tumor site alone, patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the rectum had improved 5-year OS (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.68-0.77, p < 0.001). However, patients with rectal poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) who underwent oncologic resection had lower 5-year OS (35.1%) compared to colon (41.9%), and SI (72.5%).

Surgical resection may improve 5-year OS for NECs of the SI and colon, except in the rectum where survival was reduced. More frequent surveillance and timely initiation of systemic therapy should be considered for rectal NECs.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the cervix are rare aggressive tumors associated with poor prognosis and only limited treatment options. Although there is some literature on molecular underpinnings of cervical small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (SCNECs), detailed morphologic and associated molecular characteristics of cervical NENs remains to be elucidated. Herein, 14 NENs (SCNEC: 6, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma [LCNEC]: 6, neuroendocrine tumor [NET]: 2), including 5 admixed with human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated adenocarcinoma (carcinoma admixed with neuroendocrine carcinoma) were analyzed. All except 3 SCNECs were HPV16/18 positive. TP53 (3) and/or RB1 (4) alterations (3 concurrent) were only seen in SCNECs (4/6) and were enriched in the HPV16/18-negative tumors. The other most common molecular changes in neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) overlapping with those reported in the literature for cervical carcinomas involved PI3K/MAPK pathway (4) and MYC (4) and were seen in both SCNECs and LCNECs. In contrast, the 2 NETs lacked any significant alterations. Two LCNECs admixed with adenocarcinoma had enough material to sequence separately each component. In both pathogenic alterations were shared between the 2 components, including ERBB2 amplification in one and an MSH6 mutation with MYC amplification in the other. Overall, these findings suggest that cervical HPV-associated NETs are genomically silent and high-grade NECs (regardless of small or large cell morphology) share molecular pathways with common cervical carcinomas as it has been reported in the endometrium and are different from NECs at other sites. Molecular analysis of these highly malignant neoplasms might inform the clinical management for potential therapeutic targets.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with increasing incidence and an ill-defined pathobiology. Although many PanNETs are indolent and remain stable for years, a subset may behave aggressively and metastasize widely. Thus, the increasing and frequent detection of PanNETs presents a treatment dilemma. Current prognostic systems are susceptible to interpretation errors, sampling issues, and do not accurately reflect the clinical behavior of these neoplasms. Hence, additional biomarkers are needed to improve the prognostic stratification of patients diagnosed with a PanNET. Recent studies have identified alterations in death domain-associated protein 6 (DAXX) and alpha-thalassemia/mental retardation X-linked (ATRX), as well as alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT), as promising prognostic biomarkers. This review summarizes the identification, clinical utility, and specific nuances in testing for DAXX/ATRX by immunohistochemistry and ALT by telomere-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization in PanNETs. Furthermore, a discussion on diagnostic indications for DAXX, ATRX, and ALT status is provided to include the distinction between PanNETs and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (PanNECs), and determining pancreatic origin for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors in the setting of an unknown primary.

Hypervascularization is a typical feature of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and it frequently allows their recognition at imaging studies. However, the density of microvessels in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors changes according to their biological behavior, and a low microvessel density is associated with higher disease aggressiveness. The primary aim was to investigate the relationship between microvessel density and aggressiveness of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The secondary aim was to evaluate the ability of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in predicting tumor microvessel density.