1
|
van Berkel L, Kuindersma M, van Iperen ID, Adriaansen HJ, Hulstein JJJ, Spronk PE. A retrospective Cohort study on the effect of the LOw-molecular weighT heparin (LMWH) nadroparin dose on anti-XA levels in a mixed medical-surgical ICU population: CLOT-Xa. J Crit Care 2025; 86:154991. [PMID: 39689379 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2024] [Revised: 11/20/2024] [Accepted: 12/02/2024] [Indexed: 12/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are widely used for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in critically ill patients. The objective of this study was to assess the dose-response relationship between nadroparin dose and anti-Xa activity in ICU patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Critically ill adult patients who were admitted to the ICU, and received at least three subcutaneous injections of nadroparin were included. The dose-effect relationship between nadroparin dose and anti-Xa level was analysed through a mixed-effects logistic regression model. RESULTS In total, 327 ICU patients were included. Median anti-Xa levels ranged from <0.1 IU/mL after nadroparin 0-37 IU/kg/day to 0.6 IU/mL after nadroparin >85 IU/kg/day (p < 0.01). Among all 1520 anti-Xa measurements, 859 (57 %) measurements were in the desired anti-Xa range. The best adequacy of anti-Xa levels was observed in nadroparin doses of 38-85 IU/kg (73 %). No differences in the odds of bleeding events or VTE between different anti-Xa levels were found. CONCLUSIONS We found a clear dose-response relationship between nadroparin dose and anti-Xa levels. Increasing nadroparin doses led to more adequate anti-Xa levels without a change in the occurrence of VTE or major bleeding events, suggesting that LMWH therapy can be successfully and safely personalized using anti-Xa guided dosing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisanne van Berkel
- Departments of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelre Hospitals, Albert Schweitzerlaan 31, 7334, DZ, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands.
| | - Marnix Kuindersma
- Departments of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelre Hospitals, Albert Schweitzerlaan 31, 7334, DZ, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
| | - Ingrid D van Iperen
- Departments of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelre Hospitals, Albert Schweitzerlaan 31, 7334, DZ, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands; Departments of Expertise Centre for Intensive Care Rehabilitation Apeldoorn - ExpIRA, Gelre Hospitals, Albert Schweitzerlaan 31, 7334, DZ, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
| | - Henk J Adriaansen
- Departments of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Hematology, Gelre Hospitals, Albert Schweitzerlaan 31, 7334, DZ, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
| | - Janine J J Hulstein
- Departments of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Hematology, Gelre Hospitals, Albert Schweitzerlaan 31, 7334, DZ, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
| | - Peter E Spronk
- Departments of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelre Hospitals, Albert Schweitzerlaan 31, 7334, DZ, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands; Departments of Expertise Centre for Intensive Care Rehabilitation Apeldoorn - ExpIRA, Gelre Hospitals, Albert Schweitzerlaan 31, 7334, DZ, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Al-Dorzi HM, Arishi H, Al-Hameed FM, Burns KEA, Mehta S, Jose J, Alsolamy SJ, Abdukahil SAI, Afesh LY, Alshahrani MS, Mandourah Y, Almekhlafi GA, Almaani M, Al Bshabshe A, Finfer S, Arshad Z, Khalid I, Mehta Y, Gaur A, Hawa H, Buscher H, Lababidi H, Al Aithan A, Al-Dawood A, Arabi YM. Performance of Risk Assessment Models for VTE in Patients Who Are Critically Ill Receiving Pharmacologic Thromboprophylaxis: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Pneumatic Compression for Preventing VTE Trial. Chest 2025; 167:598-610. [PMID: 39232999 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 09/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The diagnostic performance of the available risk assessment models for VTE in patients who are critically ill receiving pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis is unclear. RESEARCH QUESTION For patients who are critically ill receiving pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, do risk assessment models predict who would develop VTE or who could benefit from adjunctive pneumatic compression for thromboprophylaxis? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS In this post hoc analysis of the Pneumatic Compression for Preventing VTE (PREVENT) trial, different risk assessment models for VTE (ICU-VTE, Kucher, Intermountain, Caprini, Padua, and International Medical Prevention Registry on VTE [IMPROVE] models) were evaluated. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were constructed, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated. In addition, subgroup analyses were performed evaluating the effect of adjunctive pneumatic compression vs none on the study primary outcome. RESULTS Among 2,003 patients receiving pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, 198 (9.9%) developed VTE. With multivariable logistic regression analysis, the independent predictors of VTE were Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, prior immobilization, femoral central venous catheter, and invasive mechanical ventilation. All risk assessment models had areas under the curve < 0.60 except for the Caprini model (0.64; 95% CI, 0.60-0.68). The Caprini, Padua, and Intermountain models had high sensitivities (> 85%) but low specificities (< 20%) for predicting VTE, whereas the ICU-VTE, Kucher, and IMPROVE models had low sensitivities (< 15%) but high specificities (> 85%). The positive predictive values were low (< 20%) for all studied cutoff scores, whereas the negative predictive values were mostly > 90%. Using the risk assessment models to stratify patients into high- vs low-risk subgroups, the effect of adjunctive pneumatic compression vs pharmacologic prophylaxis alone did not differ across the subgroups (Pinteraction > .05). INTERPRETATION The risk assessment models for VTE performed poorly in patients who are critically ill receiving pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. None of the models identified a subgroup of patients who might benefit from adjunctive pneumatic compression. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, No.: NCT02040103, URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS gov. ISRCTN44653506; International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial No.: ISRCTN44653506, URL: https://www.isrctn.com.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasan M Al-Dorzi
- Intensive Care Department, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Hatim Arishi
- Intensive Care Department, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Fahad M Al-Hameed
- Intensive Care Department, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Karen E A Burns
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Unity Health Toronto-St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sangeeta Mehta
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Medical Surgical ICU, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jesna Jose
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Sami J Alsolamy
- Intensive Care Department, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Sheryl Ann I Abdukahil
- Intensive Care Department, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Lara Y Afesh
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed S Alshahrani
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Yasser Mandourah
- Military Medical Services, Ministry of Defense, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Ghaleb A Almekhlafi
- Department of Intensive Care Services, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Almaani
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Ali Al Bshabshe
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, King Khalid University, Asir Central Hospital, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Simon Finfer
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, England
| | - Zia Arshad
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India
| | - Imran Khalid
- Critical Care Section, Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Yatin Mehta
- Institute of Critical Care and Anaesthesiology, Medanta-The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Atul Gaur
- Intensive Care Department, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, NSW, Australia
| | - Hassan Hawa
- Critical Care Medicine Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Hergen Buscher
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Centre for Applied Medical Research, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Hani Lababidi
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulsalam Al Aithan
- Intensive Care Division, Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz Hospital, Al Ahsa, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Al Ahsa, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Al Ahsa, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulaziz Al-Dawood
- Intensive Care Department, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Yaseen M Arabi
- Intensive Care Department, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Keirsey M, Niziolek GM. Management of post-injury anticoagulation in the traumatic brain injury patient: A scoping review. Injury 2025; 56:112159. [PMID: 39799871 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2025.112159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2024] [Revised: 01/07/2025] [Accepted: 01/08/2025] [Indexed: 01/15/2025]
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among trauma patients. The care of these patients continues to be a complex endeavor with prevention of associated complications, often requiring as much attention as that of the treatment of the primary injury. Paramount among these are venous thromboembolic events (VTE) due to their high incidence, additive effect on the risk of morbidity and mortality, and the careful balance that must be utilized in their diagnosis and treatment to prevent progression of the brain injury itself. In this review, we have synthesized the most recent major studies detailing the ideal choice of chemoprophylactic agent, the timing of initiation, and continued monitoring and management strategies through the hospital course and beyond. Additional discussion is provided for subpopulations in which management can vary significantly, including the elderly, critically ill, and obese. Ultimately, current literature supports the use and safety of low molecular weight heparin over unfractionated heparin, especially when dosed using newer assays including anti-Xa levels. The timing of prophylaxis remains important, as the risk of VTE increases with each day that prophylaxis is held. Consensus findings favor initiation within 24-72 h, in the absence of documented progression, life threatening bleeding, or need for major surgical intervention. Despite available data, there continues to be significant variability in practice patterns which we hope to address with this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Keirsey
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Section of Acute and Critical Care Surgery, USA.
| | - Grace M Niziolek
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Section of Acute and Critical Care Surgery, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Thakur S, Kaur K, Agarwal S, Zabiba F, Maatouk H, Zabiba A, Dominguez Cervantes J, Huang T, Arjmand A, Arjmand A, Kumar K. Retrospective chart review of venous thromboembolism incidence and management in rural patients undergoing varicose vein treatment. Phlebology 2025:2683555241313272. [PMID: 39750768 DOI: 10.1177/02683555241313272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE Determine the rate of incidence, risk factors, and management for developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) for varicose veins. METHODS All charts of patients undergoing venous ablation from 2016 to 2023 were reviewed at a rural vein treatment clinic. The incidence of VTE was noted and a chart review was completed to identify risk factors for VTE, EHIT score, EFIT score, and management. RESULTS Patients underwent 14,172 UGFS procedures and 4865 RFAs. VTE was noted in 45 patients (0.24%), with no pulmonary embolisms and no fatal outcomes among the patient population. Patients diagnosed with VTE had a median CEAP score of 3 and a modified Caprini risk score of 7.2. Increased risk of VTE was noted in patients with prior history of DVT, patients undergoing UGFS, patients with higher Caprini scores. 90% of patients diagnosed with VTE had a prior history of DVT (p < 0.05). Patients who received UGFS treatments had a higher modified Caprini Risk Score than patients who received an RFA and UGFS, 8.7 and 6.8 respectively (p < 0.05). Increased risk of VTE was noted in patients with swollen legs prior to treatment (0.92%), visible varicose veins (0.92%), obesity (0.49%), and surgery within the prior 3 months to vein treatment (0.41%). CONCLUSION The modified Caprini score is a useful tool for risk stratification for VTE and its incidence is low for patients undergoing RFA and UGFS. Prior history of VTE represents a significant risk for recurrence in patients undergoing RFA and UGFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivani Thakur
- Research Department, Valley Vein Health Center, Turlock, CA, USA
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Kamalpreet Kaur
- Research Department, Valley Vein Health Center, Turlock, CA, USA
- California State University Stanislaus, One University Circle, Turlock, CA, USA
| | - Sandhini Agarwal
- Research Department, Valley Vein Health Center, Turlock, CA, USA
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Fatima Zabiba
- Research Department, Valley Vein Health Center, Turlock, CA, USA
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, California Health Sciences, Clovis, CA, USA
| | - Hussein Maatouk
- Research Department, Valley Vein Health Center, Turlock, CA, USA
- California State University Stanislaus, One University Circle, Turlock, CA, USA
| | - Ahmed Zabiba
- Research Department, Valley Vein Health Center, Turlock, CA, USA
- Davis School of Medicine, University of California, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Jasmin Dominguez Cervantes
- Research Department, Valley Vein Health Center, Turlock, CA, USA
- Davis School of Medicine, University of California, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Tiffany Huang
- Research Department, Valley Vein Health Center, Turlock, CA, USA
| | | | - Ahmadzakaria Arjmand
- Research Department, Valley Vein Health Center, Turlock, CA, USA
- Davis School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Keshav Kumar
- Research Department, Valley Vein Health Center, Turlock, CA, USA
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Southern California, Keck Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bassa B, Little E, Ryan D, Cronin J, Lyons F, Ainle FN, Breslin T. VTE rates and risk factors in major trauma patients. Injury 2024; 55:111964. [PMID: 39481253 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2024] [Revised: 09/23/2024] [Accepted: 10/14/2024] [Indexed: 11/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common and in some instances life-threatening complication following severe traumatic injury. Owing to a lack of high-quality evidence in VTE risk prediction and prevention in this cohort, major trauma patients receive variable VTE preventative care. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the reported rates of VTE in major trauma patients, and associated risk factors. METHODS A comprehensive database search was conducted using EBSCO/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane and Scopus to identify studies published between 1990 and 2023. Original Studies quantifying the occurrence of and/or evaluating risk factors for VTE, PE and DVT in a defined population were eligible for inclusion. Five reviewers screened, appraised, and extracted data from the selected studies. RESULTS A total of 22 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in Northern America (72 %), followed by Asia (18 %), and Europe (9 %). Of the 22 studies, 17 were retrospective, 4 were prospective and 1 was the control arm of an RCT. The reported rates in included studies ranged from 0.39 % to 32 % (VTE), 0.59 % to 57.60 % (DVT) and 0.35 % to 24.0 % (PE). Operative procedure was the most consistently reported associated variable for DVT followed by delays to prophylaxis and pelvic injury. Lower extremity injury was the most frequently reported associated variable for PE followed by male sex and increased age. Age was the most frequently reported variable for both DVT and PE. CONCLUSION There exists significant variation in the reported rates of VTE in major trauma patients globally. Operative procedure, delays to prophylaxis and pelvic injury were the most consistently reported associated variables for DVT. Lower extremity injury followed by male sex and increased age were the most frequently reported associated variables for PE. Although studies indicate possible differences in risk factors for DVT and PE, heterogeneity in study characteristics and outcome reporting impedes any meaningful conclusions. Reconciliation of VTE rates in major trauma patients is necessary when comparing populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bibi Bassa
- School of Postgraduate studies, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Ireland; Department of Trauma and Emergency Medicine, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital (MMUH), Eccles street, Dublin 7, Ireland.
| | - Elizabeth Little
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Medicine, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital (MMUH), Eccles street, Dublin 7, Ireland.
| | - David Ryan
- Department of Radiology, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin 0, Ireland.
| | - John Cronin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, St Vincent's University Hospital (SVUH), Dublin 4, Ireland.
| | - Frank Lyons
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedics, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital (MMUH), Eccles street, Dublin 7, Ireland.
| | - Fionnuala Ni Ainle
- Department of Haematology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital (MMUH), Eccles street, Dublin 7, Ireland.
| | - Tomas Breslin
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Medicine, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital (MMUH), Eccles street, Dublin 7, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Agrawal A, Bajaj S, Bhagat U, Chandna S, Arockiam AD, El Dahdah J, Haroun E, Gupta R, Shekhar S, Raj K, Nayar D, Bajaj D, Chaudhury P, Griffin BP, Wang TKM. Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Venous and Arterial Thrombosis in COVID-19: A Nationwide Inpatient Analysis. Heart Lung Circ 2024; 33:1563-1573. [PMID: 38942623 DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2024.04.167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 03/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is known to increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and arterial thromboembolism (ATE). However, the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of clinical thrombosis for inpatients with COVID-19 are not well known. This study aimed to enhance our understanding of clinical thrombosis in COVID-19, its associated factors, and mortality outcomes. METHOD Hospitalised adult (≥18 years of age) patients with COVID-19 in 2020 were retrospectively identified from the US National Inpatient Sample database. Clinical characteristics, incident VTE, ATE, and in-hospital mortality outcomes were recorded. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify clinical factors associated with thrombosis and in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 inpatients. RESULTS A total of 1,583,135 adult patients with COVID-19 in the year 2020 were identified from the National Inpatient Sample database; patients with thrombosis were 41% females with a mean age of 65.4 (65.1-65.6) years. The incidence of thrombosis was 6.1% (97,185), including VTE at 4.8% (76,125), ATE at 3.0% (47,790), and the in-hospital mortality rate was 13.4% (212,785). Patients with thrombosis were more likely to have respiratory symptoms of COVID-19 (76.7% vs 75%, p<0.001) compared with patients without thrombosis. The main factors associated with overall thrombosis, VTE, and ATE were paralysis, ventilation, solid tumours without metastasis, metastatic cancer, and acute liver failure. Although all thrombosis categories were associated with higher in-hospital mortality for COVID-19 inpatients in univariable analyses (p<0.001), they were not in multivariable analyses-thrombosis (odds ratio [OR] 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-1.70; p=0.19), VTE (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.52-1.00; p=0.05), and ATE (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.92-1.25; p=0.36). CONCLUSIONS The association of COVID-19 with thrombosis and VTE increases with increasing severity of the COVID-19 disease. Risk stratification of thrombosis is crucial in COVID-19 patients to determine the necessity of thromboprophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit Agrawal
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Suryansh Bajaj
- Department of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Umesh Bhagat
- Department of Hospital Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sanya Chandna
- Department of Hospital Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Aro Daniela Arockiam
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Joseph El Dahdah
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Elio Haroun
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rahul Gupta
- Lehigh Valley Heart Institute, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA, USA
| | - Shashank Shekhar
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kavin Raj
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, CA, USA
| | - Divya Nayar
- Department of Neurology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Divyansh Bajaj
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Pulkit Chaudhury
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Brian P Griffin
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Tom Kai Ming Wang
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang L, Qin J, Li P. Bioinformatics analysis of potential common pathogenic mechanisms for COVID-19 and venous thromboembolism. Cytokine 2024; 181:156682. [PMID: 38909539 DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2024.156682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A growing body of research has shown that patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have significantly higher rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) than healthy. However, the mechanism remains incompletely elucidated. This study aimed to further investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of this complication. METHODS The gene expression profiles of COVID-19 and VTE were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. After identifying the common differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for COVID-19 and VTE, functional annotation, a protein-protein interactions (PPI) network, module construction, and hub gene identification were performed. Finally, we constructed a transcription factor (TF)-gene regulatory network and a TF-miRNA regulatory network for hub genes. RESULTS A total of 42 common DEGs were selected for subsequent analyses. Functional analyses showed that biological function and signaling pathways collectively participated in the development and progression of VTE and COVID-19. Finally, 8 significant hub genes were identified using the cytoHubba plugin, including RSL24D1, RPS17, RPS27, HINT1, COX7C, RPL35, RPL34, and NDUFA4, which had preferable values as diagnostic markers for COVID-19 and VTE. CONCLUSIONS Our study revealed the common pathogenesis of COVID-19 and VTE. These common pathways and pivotal genes may provide new ideas for further mechanistic studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Zhang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Jing Qin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Peiwu Li
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cochran AR, Shaw G, Shue-McGuffin K, Elias K, Vrochides D. Enhanced Recovery after Surgery recommendations that most impact patient care: A multi-institutional, multidiscipline analysis in the United States. World J Surg 2024; 48:791-800. [PMID: 38459715 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compliance to the entire Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol improves surgical recovery, where higher compliance improves outcomes. However, specific items may predict improved recovery more than others. Studies have evaluated the impact of individual ERAS recommendations though they are either single center, not based in the United States (US), or focus on colorectal procedures only. This study aims to evaluate compliance on surgical outcomes in two large healthcare systems in the US across four surgery types. METHODS Compliance to individual recommendations, limited patient characteristics, and outcomes data from two US ERAS Centers of Excellence (CoE) for hepatectomy, pancreatectomy, radical cystectomy, and head and neck (HN) resections were evaluated. Outcomes included 30-day Clavien-Dindo≥3, readmission, mortality, and length of stay (LOS). Multivariate regressions were performed as appropriate for the data for each surgery type. Clavien≥3 was included to control for severity of complications, and the CoE variable was force-retained. RESULTS A total of 2886 records were analyzed. Controlling for CoE and severity of patient complications, early removal of Foley catheter was associated with significant reductions in LOS in the liver, pancreas, and HN procedures and reductions in complications in the liver and pancreas. Limited use of NG tubes reduced LOS in the pancreas and complications in urology. Oral carbohydrate loading reduced LOS in the pancreas, and patient education reduced mortality in HN patients. CONCLUSIONS This study reports the effect of ERAS compliance on outcomes, by surgery type, in a multi-institutional US setting. Future studies should validate these findings and consider surgery-specific predictive models comprised of individual ERAS recommendations in real-world applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allyson R Cochran
- Carolinas Center for Surgical Outcomes Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - George Shaw
- Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Data Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Katherine Shue-McGuffin
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kevin Elias
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dionisios Vrochides
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Carolinas Medical Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pérez SG, Ruiz-Talero P, Velandia OMM. Factors associated with venous thromboembolic disease due to failed thromboprophylaxis. Thromb J 2023; 21:120. [PMID: 38057785 DOI: 10.1186/s12959-023-00566-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Available evidence to identify factors independently associated with failed thromboprophylaxis (FT) in medical patients is insufficient. The present study seeks to evaluate in hospitalized patients, which clinical factors are associated with the development of FT. MATERIALS AND METHODS A case-control study nested to a historical cohort, comparing patients who developed failed thromboprophylaxis (cases) with those who did not (controls). Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was performed to define the factors associated with FT. RESULTS We selected 204 cases and 408 controls (52.4% men, median age 63 years). Medical patients were 78.4%. The most frequent thromboprophylaxis scheme was enoxaparin. In the failed thromboprophylaxis group, most of the embolic events corresponded to pulmonary embolism (53.4%). Among cases, BMI was higher (26.3 vs. 25 kg/m2, p < 0.001), as was the proportion of patients with leukocytosis > 13,000 (27% vs. 18.9%, p:0.22), and patients who required intensive care management (48% vs. 24.8%, p < 0.001). Factors independently associated with FT were BMI (OR1.04;95%CI 1.00-1.09, p:0.39), active cancer (OR:1.63;95%IC 1.03-2.57, p:0.04), leukocytosis (OR:1.64;95%CI 1.05-2.57, p:0.03) and ICU requirement (OR:3.67;95%CI 2.31-5.83, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Our study suggests that the failed thromboprophylaxis is associated with high BMI, active cancer, leukocytosis, and ICU requirement. Future studies should evaluate whether there is benefit in adjusting the thromboprophylaxis scheme in patients with one or more of these factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santiago Grillo Pérez
- Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
- Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia.
| | - Paula Ruiz-Talero
- Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
- Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Oscar Mauricio Muñoz Velandia
- Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
- Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Clapham RE, Marrinan E, Roberts LN. VTE prevention in medical inpatients - Current approach and controversies. THROMBOSIS UPDATE 2023; 13:100151. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tru.2023.100151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2025] Open
|
11
|
Zewudie MM, Melesse DY, Filatie TD, Zeleke ME. Variables associated to intensive care unit (ICU)-mortality among patients admitted to surgical intensive care unit in Ethiopia: a retrospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiol 2023; 23:279. [PMID: 37596596 PMCID: PMC10436438 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02230-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The present study aimed to assess variables associated to ICU-mortality among patients admitted to surgical intensive care unit in Ethiopia. METHODS A Hospital-based retrospective follow-up study was conducted on all patients who were admitted to the surgical intensive care unit. Data were extracted from patients' charts with a pretested data extraction tool, entered into Epi-data 4.6.0, and analyzed with STATA- 14. Bivariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted. RESULTS Of the total study participants (388), 148 (38.1%) patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit died during the follow-up period with a median survival time of 11 days. Potassium level < 3.5 mmol/L (adjusted hazard ratio ( AHR): 3.46, 95% CI (1.83 6.55), potassium level > 5.0 mmol/L (AHR:2.41, 95% CI (1.29-4.51), hypoxia (AHR:1.66, 95% CI (1.10-2.48), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score < 9 (AHR: 4.06, 95% CI (1.51-10.89), mechanical ventilation (AHR:12, 95%CI (3-45), absence of thromboprophylaxis (AHR:10.8,95% CI (6.04-19.29), absence of enteral feeding (AHR:3.56, 95% CI (2.20-5.78) were variables associated with ICU-mortality among patients admitted to surgical intensive care unit. CONCLUSIONS The overall ICU-mortality of patients admitted to our surgical intensive care unit was higher compared to patients admitted to similar intensive care unit in developed countries. The variables associated to ICU-mortality among patients admitted to surgical intensive care unit were abnormal serum potassium level, lower GCS score, mechanical support, hypoxia, absence of thromboprophylaxis, and enteral feeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Misgan Mulatie Zewudie
- Department of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Injibara University, Injibara, Ethiopia
| | - Debas Yaregal Melesse
- Department of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Science, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
| | - Tesera Dereje Filatie
- Department of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Science, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Mulualem Endeshaw Zeleke
- Department of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Science, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Amin A, Kartashov A, Ngai W, Steele K, Rosenthal N. Effectiveness, safety, and costs of thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin in inpatients with obesity. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1163684. [PMID: 37396589 PMCID: PMC10313352 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1163684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Obesity is a frequent and significant risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE) among hospitalized adults. Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis can help prevent VTE, but real-world effectiveness, safety, and costs among inpatients with obesity are unknown. Objective This study aims to compare clinical and economic outcomes among adult medical inpatients with obesity who received thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin (UFH). Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed using the PINC AI™ Healthcare Database, which covers more than 850 hospitals in the United States. Patients included were ≥18 years old, had a primary or secondary discharge diagnosis of obesity [International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 diagnosis codes 278.01, 278.02, and 278.03; ICD-10 diagnosis codes E66.0x, E66.1, E66.2, E66.8, and E66.9], received ≥1 thromboprophylactic dose of enoxaparin (≤40 mg/day) or UFH (≤15,000 IU/day) during the index hospitalization, stayed ≥6 days in the hospital, and were discharged between 01 January 2010, and 30 September 2016. We excluded surgical patients, patients with pre-existing VTE, and those who received higher (treatment-level) doses or multiple types of anticoagulants. Multivariable regression models were constructed to compare enoxaparin with UFH based on the incidence of VTE, pulmonary embolism (PE)---------related mortality, overall in-hospital mortality, major bleeding, treatment costs, and total hospitalization costs during the index hospitalization and the 90 days after index discharge (readmission period). Results Among 67,193 inpatients who met the selection criteria, 44,367 (66%) and 22,826 (34%) received enoxaparin and UFH, respectively, during their index hospitalization. Demographic, visit-related, clinical, and hospital characteristics differed significantly between groups. Enoxaparin during index hospitalization was associated with 29%, 73%, 30%, and 39% decreases in the adjusted odds of VTE, PE-related mortality, in-hospital mortality, and major bleeding, respectively, compared with UFH (all p < 0.002). Compared with UFH, enoxaparin was associated with significantly lower total hospitalization costs during the index hospitalization and readmission periods. Conclusions Among adult inpatients with obesity, primary thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin compared with UFH was associated with significantly lower risks of in-hospital VTE, major bleeding, PE-related mortality, overall in-hospital mortality, and hospitalization costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alpesh Amin
- Department of Medicine, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Alex Kartashov
- PINC AI™ Applied Sciences, Premier Inc., Charlotte, NC, United States
| | | | | | - Ning Rosenthal
- PINC AI™ Applied Sciences, Premier Inc., Charlotte, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Russell L, Weihe S, Madsen EK, Hvas CL, Leistner JW, Michelsen J, Brøchner AC, Bastiansen A, Nielsen FM, Meier N, Andreasen AS, Ribergaard N, Rasmussen BS, Sølling CG, Buck DL, Bundgaard H, Pedersen HS, Darfelt IS, Poulsen LM, Ibsen M, Plovsing RR, Sigurdsson ST, Iversen S, Hildebrandt T, Mohr T, Espelund US, Jørgensen V, Haase N, Perner A. Thromboembolic and bleeding events in ICU patients with COVID-19: A nationwide, observational study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2023; 67:76-85. [PMID: 36263897 PMCID: PMC9874434 DOI: 10.1111/aas.14157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Revised: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intensive care unit (ICU) patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have an increased risk of thromboembolic complications. We describe the occurrence of thromboembolic and bleeding events in all ICU patients with COVID-19 in Denmark during the first and second waves of the pandemic. METHODS This was a sub-study of the Danish Intensive Care Covid database, in which all patients with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to Danish ICUs from 10th March 2020 to 30th June 2021 were included. We registered coagulation variables at admission, and all thromboembolic and bleeding events, and the use of heparins during ICU stay. Variables associated with thrombosis and bleeding and any association with 90-day mortality were estimated using Cox regression analyses. RESULTS We included 1369 patients in this sub-study; 158 (12%, 95% confidence interval 10-13) had a thromboembolic event in ICU and 309 (23%, 20-25) had a bleeding event, among whom 81 patients (6%, 4.8-7.3) had major bleeding. We found that mechanical ventilation and increased D-dimer were associated with thrombosis and mechanical ventilation, low platelet count and presence of haematological malignancy were associated with bleeding. Most patients (76%) received increased doses of thromboprophylaxis during their ICU stay. Thromboembolic events were not associated with mortality in adjusted analysis (hazard ratio 1.35 [0.91-2.01, p = .14], whereas bleeding events were 1.55 [1.18-2.05, p = .002]). CONCLUSIONS Both thromboembolic and bleeding events frequently occurred in ICU patients with COVID-19. Based on these data, it is not apparent that increased doses of thromboprophylaxis were beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lene Russell
- Department of Intensive CareCopenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Sarah Weihe
- Department of AnaesthesiologyZealand University HospitalRoskildeDenmark
| | - Emilie Kabel Madsen
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive CareAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
| | | | - Jens Wolfgang Leistner
- Department of Intensive CareCopenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Jens Michelsen
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive CareOdense University HospitalOdenseDenmark
| | - Anne Craveiro Brøchner
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive CareUniversity Hospital of Southern DenmarkKoldingDenmark
| | - Anders Bastiansen
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive CareBispebjerg HospitalCopenhagenDenmark
| | | | - Nick Meier
- Department of Intensive CareCopenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
| | | | - Niels‐Erik Ribergaard
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive CareHjørring Regional HospitalHjørringDenmark
| | - Bodil Steen Rasmussen
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive CareAalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
| | | | - David Levarett Buck
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive CareHolbæk HospitalHolbækDenmark
| | - Helle Bundgaard
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive CareRanders Regional HospitalRandersDenmark
| | - Helle Scharling Pedersen
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive CareNykøbing Falster HospitalNykøbing FalsterDenmark
| | - Iben Strøm Darfelt
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive CareRegionshospitalet GødstrupHerningDenmark
| | | | - Michael Ibsen
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive CareNorth Zealand HospitalHillerødDenmark
| | - Ronni R. Plovsing
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive CareHvidovre HospitalHvidovreDenmark
| | | | - Susanne Iversen
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive CareSlagelse HospitalSlagelseDenmark
| | - Thomas Hildebrandt
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive CareZealand University HospitalRoskildeDenmark
| | - Thomas Mohr
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive CareGentofte HospitalGentofteDenmark
| | | | - Vibeke Jørgensen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology, RigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Nicolai Haase
- Department of Intensive CareCopenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Anders Perner
- Department of Intensive CareCopenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Alexander KM, Butts CC, Lee YLL, Kutcher ME, Polite N, Haut ER, Spain D, Berndtson AE, Costantini TW, Simmons JD. Survey of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in trauma patients: current prescribing practices and concordance with clinical practice guidelines. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2023; 8:e001070. [PMID: 37205274 PMCID: PMC10186479 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2022-001070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Pharmacological venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is recommended in the vast majority of trauma patients. The purpose of this study was to characterize current dosing practices and timing of initiation of pharmacological VTE chemoprophylaxis at trauma centers. Methods This was an international, cross-sectional survey of trauma providers. The survey was sponsored by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) and distributed to AAST members. The survey included 38 questions about practitioner demographics, experience, level and location of trauma center, and individual/site-specific practices regarding the dosing, selection, and timing of initiation of pharmacological VTE chemoprophylaxis in trauma patients. Results One hundred eighteen trauma providers responded (estimated response rate 6.9%). Most respondents were at level 1 trauma centers (100/118; 84.7%) and had >10 years of experience (73/118; 61.9%). While multiple dosing regimens were used, the most common dose reported was enoxaparin 30 mg every 12 hours (80/118; 67.8%). The majority of respondents (88/118; 74.6%) indicated adjusting the dose in patients with obesity. Seventy-eight (66.1%) routinely use antifactor Xa levels to guide dosing. Respondents at academic institutions were more likely to use guideline-directed dosing (based on the Eastern Association of the Surgery of Trauma and the Western Trauma Association guidelines) of VTE chemoprophylaxis compared with those at non-academic centers (86.2% vs 62.5%; p=0.0158) and guideline-directed dosing was reported more often if the trauma team included a clinical pharmacist (88.2% vs 69.0%; p=0.0142). Wide variability in initial timing of VTE chemoprophylaxis after traumatic brain injury, solid organ injury, and spinal cord injuries was found. Conclusions A high degree of variability exists in prescribing and monitoring practices for the prevention of VTE in trauma patients. Clinical pharmacists may be helpful on trauma teams to optimize dosing and increase prescribing of guideline-concordant VTE chemoprophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin M Alexander
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Pharmacy, UF Health Shands Hospital, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | | | | | - Matthew E Kutcher
- Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
| | - Nathan Polite
- Surgery, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA
| | - Elliott R Haut
- Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - David Spain
- Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | | | - Todd W Costantini
- Surgery, UC San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Jon D Simmons
- Surgery, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Helms J, Middeldorp S, Spyropoulos AC. Thromboprophylaxis in critical care. Intensive Care Med 2023; 49:75-78. [PMID: 36038712 PMCID: PMC9422935 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06850-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Helms
- Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA), Faculté de Médecine; Hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France.
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), UMR 1260, Regenerative Nanomedicine (RNM), FMTS, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Saskia Middeldorp
- Department of Internal Medicine and Radboud Institute of Health Sciences (RIHS), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alex C Spyropoulos
- The Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, USA
- Institute of Health System Science, The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, USA
- Anticoagulation and Clinical Thrombosis Services, Northwell Health at Lenox Hill Hospital, 130 E 77th St, New York, NY, 10075, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jagiasi BG, Chhallani AA, Dixit SB, Kumar R, Pandit RA, Govil D, Prayag S, Zirpe KG, Mishra RC, Chanchalani G, Kapadia FN. Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Statement for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in the Critical Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022; 26:S51-S65. [PMID: 36896363 PMCID: PMC9989869 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a preventable complication of critical illness, and this guideline aims to convey a pragmatic approach to the problem. Guidelines have multiplied over the last decade, and their utility has become increasingly conflicted as the reader interprets all suggestions or recommendations as something that must be followed. The nuances of grade of recommendation vs level of evidence are often ignored, and the difference between a "we suggest" vs a "we recommend" is overlooked. There is a general unease among clinicians that failure to follow the guidelines translates to poor medical practice and legal culpability. We attempt to overcome these limitations by highlighting ambiguity when it occurs and refraining from dogmatic recommendations in the absence of robust evidence. Readers and practitioners may find the lack of specific recommendations unsatisfactory, but we believe that true ambiguity is better than inaccurate certainty. We have attempted to comply with the guidelines on how to create guidelines.1 And to overcome the poor compliance with these guidelines.2 Some observers have expressed concern that DVT prophylaxis guidelines may cause more harm than good.3 We have placed greater emphasis on large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with clinical end point and de-emphasized RCTs with surrogate end points and also de-emphasized hypothesis generating studies (observational studies, small RCTs, and meta-analysis of these studies). We have de-emphasized RCTs in non-intensive care unit populations like postoperative patients or those with cancer and stroke. We have also considered resource limitation settings and have avoided recommending costly and poorly proven therapeutic options. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE Jagiasi BG, Chhallani AA, Dixit SB, Kumar R, Pandit RA, Govil D, et al. Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Statement for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in the Critical Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(S2):S51-S65.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bharat G Jagiasi
- Critical Care Department, Reliance Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | | | - Subhal B Dixit
- Department of Critical Care, Sanjeevan and MJM Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Rishi Kumar
- Department of Critical Care, PD Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Rahul A Pandit
- Critical Care, Fortis Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Deepak Govil
- Institute of Critical Care and Anesthesia, Medanta – The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
| | - Shirish Prayag
- Critical Care, Prayag Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kapil G Zirpe
- Neuro Trauma Unit, Grant Medical Foundation, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Rajesh C Mishra
- Department of MICU, Shaibya Comprehensive Care Clinic, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Khanna AK, Khanna D. Venous Thromboembolism and COVID-19-an Epidemiological Perspective. Indian J Surg 2022; 85:133-140. [PMID: 35529246 PMCID: PMC9066142 DOI: 10.1007/s12262-022-03423-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was declared as pandemic by World Health Organization (WHO) in March 2020. The outbreak has caused 5,232,562 deaths worldwide until December 3rd, 2021. Though primarily affecting the respiratory system, involvement of other organ systems have been reported in severe disease. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been recognized as an important complication. Previous studies have reported the prevalence of VTE in intensive care unit (ICU) patients between 7 and 85% and in non-ICU patients between 0 and 19%. COVID-19 patients that are at high risk for VTE are also at increased risk for bleeding. In such cases, anticoagulation may potentially be harmful. Thereby, it is important to understand the risk factors for VTE predisposition in the COVID-19 patients, timing of VTE, and the rate of occurrence of VTE in hospitalized patients post-discharge. Comparison of the rate of occurrence of VTE in COVID-19 patients with the non-COVID-19 patients with similar disease severity is required to truly interpret the reportedly high rates of VTE in COVID-19 patients. Several pathophysiological mechanisms have been reported for the development of VTE in COVID-19. Autopsy-based studies have contributed to the existing knowledge. d-dimer, presently, seems to be the most suitable investigation for risk-identification of VTE supported by Doppler studies and overall clinical context. Further, prospective studies and clinical trials are essentially required to fill the gaps in evidence for occurrence, risk prediction and management of VTE in COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay Kumar Khanna
- Department of General Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh India
| | - Divya Khanna
- Department of Preventive Oncology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya Cancer Centre, Tata Memorial Cancer Centre, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh India
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dibiasi C, Gratz J, Wiegele M, Baierl A, Schaden E. Anti-factor Xa Activity Is Not Associated With Venous Thromboembolism in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis: A Retrospective Observational Study. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:888451. [PMID: 35573015 PMCID: PMC9103187 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.888451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Anti-factor Xa activity has been suggested as a surrogate parameter for judging the effectiveness of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparins in critically ill patients. However, this practice is not supported by evidence associating low anti-factor Xa activity with venous thromboembolism. Methods We performed a retrospective observational study including 1,352 critically ill patients admitted to 6 intensive care units of the Medical University of Vienna, Austria between 01/2015 and 12/2018. Included patients received prophylactically dosed enoxaparin (≤100 IU/kg body weight per day). We analyzed median peak, 12-h trough and 24-h trough anti-factor Xa activity per patient and compared anti-factor Xa activity between patients without vs. with venous thromboembolic events. Results 19 patients (1.4%) developed a total of 22 venous thromboembolic events. We did not observe a difference of median (IQR) anti-factor Xa activity between patients without venous thromboembolism [peak 0.22 IU/mL (0.14–0.32); 12-h trough 0.1 IU/mL (<0.1–0.17), 24-h trough < 0.1 IU/mL (<0.1– <0.1)] vs. patients with venous thromboembolism [peak 0.33 IU/mL (0.14–0.34); 12-h trough 0.12 IU/mL (<0.1–0.26); 24-h trough < 0.1 IU/mL (<0.1–<0.1)]. Conclusion Patients who developed venous thromboembolism had anti-factor Xa activities comparable to those who did not suffer from venous thromboembolism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Dibiasi
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Patient Safety, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes Gratz
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marion Wiegele
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Baierl
- Department of Statistic and Operations Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eva Schaden
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Patient Safety, Vienna, Austria
- *Correspondence: Eva Schaden,
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kory P, Meduri GU, Iglesias J, Varon J, Cadegiani FA, Marik PE. "MATH+" Multi-Modal Hospital Treatment Protocol for COVID-19 Infection: Clinical and Scientific Rationale. J Clin Med Res 2022; 14:53-79. [PMID: 35317360 PMCID: PMC8912998 DOI: 10.14740/jocmr4658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a severe respiratory illness caused by the new coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in Wuhan, China. The greatest impact that COVID-19 had was on intensive care units (ICUs), given that approximately 20% of hospitalized cases developed acute respiratory failure (ARF) requiring ICU admission. Based on the assumption that COVID-19 represented a viral pneumonia and no anti-coronaviral therapy existed, nearly all national and international health care societies recommended "supportive care only" avoiding other therapies outside of randomized controlled trials, with a specific prohibition against the use of corticosteroids in treatment. However, early studies of COVID-19-associated ARF reported inexplicably high mortality rates, with frequent prolonged durations of mechanical ventilation (MV), even from centers expert in such supportive care strategies. These reports led the authors to form a clinical expert panel called the Front-Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (www.flccc.net). The panel collaboratively reviewed the emerging clinical, radiographic, and pathological reports of COVID-19 while initiating multiple discussions among a wide clinical network of front-line clinical ICU experts from initial outbreak areas in China, Italy, and New York. Based on the shared early impressions of "what was working and what wasn't working", the increasing medical journal publications and the rapidly accumulating personal clinical experiences with COVID-19 patients, a treatment protocol was created for the hospitalized patients based on the core therapies of methylprednisolone, ascorbic acid, thiamine, heparin and non-antiviral co-interventions (MATH+). This manuscript reviews the scientific and clinical rationale behind MATH+ based on published in-vitro, pre-clinical, and clinical data in support of each medicine, with a special emphasis of studies supporting their use in the treatment of patients with viral syndromes and COVID-19 specifically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Kory
- Front Line Critical Care Consortium (FLCCC.org), Washington DC, USA
| | | | - Jose Iglesias
- Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Hackensack School of Medicine at Seton Hall, NJ, USA
| | - Joseph Varon
- University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Paul E. Marik
- Front Line Critical Care Consortium (FLCCC.org), Washington DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
McMahon MAJMJ, Holley COLAB. To Generalize or Not to Generalize? Chest 2022; 161:305-306. [DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
21
|
Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism in Severe COVID-19: A Study-Level Meta-Analysis of 21 Studies. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph182412944. [PMID: 34948552 PMCID: PMC8700787 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182412944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with COVID-19 in intensive care units (ICU) is frequent, but risk factors (RF) remain unidentified. In this meta-analysis (CRD42020188764) we searched for observational studies from ICUs reporting the association between VTE and RF in Medline/Embase up to 15 April 2021. Reviewers independently extracted data in duplicate and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Analyses were conducted using the random-effects model and produced a non-adjusted odds ratio (OR). We analysed 83 RF from 21 studies (5296 patients). We found moderate-certainty evidence for an association between VTE and the D-dimer peak (OR 5.83, 95%CI 3.18–10.70), and length of hospitalization (OR 7.09, 95%CI 3.41–14.73) and intubation (OR 2.61, 95%CI 1.94–3.51). We identified low-certainty evidence for an association between VTE and CRP (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.32–2.53), D-dimer (OR 4.58, 95% CI 2.52–8.50), troponin T (OR 8.64, 95% CI 3.25–22.97), and the requirement for inotropic drugs (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.15–2.43). Traditional VTE RF (i.e., history of cancer, previous VTE events, obesity) were not found to be associated to VTE in COVID-19. Anticoagulation was not associated with a decreased VTE risk. VTE RF in severe COVID-19 correspond to individual illness severity, and inflammatory and coagulation parameters.
Collapse
|
22
|
Novel Coronavirus Infection (COVID-19) Related Thrombotic and Bleeding Complications in Critically Ill Patients: Experience from an Academic Medical Center. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10235652. [PMID: 34884354 PMCID: PMC8658413 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Thrombosis and bleeding are recognized complications of the novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19), with a higher incidence described particularly in the critically ill. Methods: A retrospective review of COVID-19 patients admitted to our intensive care units (ICU) between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2020 was performed. Primary outcomes included clinically significant thrombotic and bleeding events (according to the ISTH definition) in the ICU. Secondary outcomes included mortality vis-a-vis the type of anticoagulation. Results: The cohort included 144 consecutive COVID-19 patients with a median age of 64 years (IQR 54.5–75). The majority were male (85 (59.0%)) and Caucasian (90 (62.5%)) with a median BMI of 30.5 kg/m2 (IQR 25.7–36.1). The median APACHE score at admission to the ICU was 12.5 (IQR 9.5–22). The coagulation parameters at admission were a d-dimer level of 109.2 mg/mL, a platelet count of 217.5 k/mcl, and an INR of 1.4. The anticoagulation strategy at admission included prophylactic anticoagulation for 97 (67.4%) patients and therapeutic anticoagulation for 35 (24.3%) patients, while 12 (8.3%) patients received no anticoagulation. A total of 29 patients (20.1%) suffered from thrombotic or major bleeding complications. These included 17 thrombus events (11.8%)—8 while on prophylactic anticoagulation (7 regular dose and 1 intermediate dose) and 9 while on therapeutic anticoagulation (p-value = 0.02)—and 19 major bleeding events (13.2%) (4 on no anticoagulation, 7 on prophylactic (6 regular dose and 1 intermediate dose), and 8 on therapeutic anticoagulation (p-value = 0.02)). A higher thrombosis risk among patients who received remdesivir (18.8% vs. 5.3% (p-value = 0.01)) and convalescent serum (17.3% vs. 5.8% (p-value = 0.03%)) was noted, but no association with baseline characteristics (age, sex, race, comorbidity), coagulation parameters, or treatments (steroids, mechanical ventilation) could be identified. There were 10 pulmonary embolism cases (6.9%). A total of 99 (68.8%) patients were intubated, and 66 patients (45.8%) died. Mortality was higher, but not statistically significant, in patients with thrombotic or bleeding complications—58.6% vs. 42.6% (p-value = 0.12)—and higher in the bleeding (21.2%) vs. thrombus group (12.1%), p-value = 0.06. It did not significantly differ according to the type of anticoagulation used or the coagulation parameters. Conclusions: This study describes a high incidence of thrombotic and bleeding complications among critically ill COVID-19 patients. The findings of thrombotic events in patients on anticoagulation and major bleeding events in patients on no or prophylactic anticoagulation pose a challenging clinical dilemma in the issue of anticoagulation for COVID-19 patients. The questions raised by this study and previous literature on this subject demonstrate that the role of anticoagulation in COVID-19 patients is worthy of further investigation.
Collapse
|
23
|
Kohansal Vajari M, Shirin M, Pourbagheri‐Sigaroodi A, Akbari ME, Abolghasemi H, Bashash D. COVID-19-related coagulopathy: A review of pathophysiology and pharmaceutical management. Cell Biol Int 2021; 45:1832-1850. [PMID: 33945651 PMCID: PMC8239905 DOI: 10.1002/cbin.11623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
December 2019 will never be forgotten in the history of medicine when an outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan, China sooner or later prompted the World Health Organization to issue a public health warning emergency. This is not the first nor will it be the last time that a member of β-coronaviruses (CoVs) is waging a full-scale war against human health. Notwithstanding the fact that pneumonia is the primary symptom of the novel coronavirus (2019nCoV; designated as SARS-CoV-2), the emergence of severe disease mainly due to the injury of nonpulmonary organs at the shadow of coagulopathy leaves no choice, in some cases, rather than a dreadful death. Multiple casual factors such as inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, platelet and complement activation, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system derangement, and hypoxemia play a major role in the pathogenesis of coagulopathy in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Due to the undeniable role of coagulation dysfunction in the initiation of several complications, assessment of coagulation parameters and the platelet count would be beneficial in early diagnosis and also timely prediction of disease severity. Although low-molecular-weight heparin is considered as the first-line of treatment in COVID-19-associated coagulopathy, several possible therapeutic options have also been proposed for better management of the disease. In conclusion, this review would help us to gain insight into the pathogenesis, clinical manifestation, and laboratory findings associated with COVID-19 coagulopathy and would summarize management strategies to alleviate coagulopathy-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahdi Kohansal Vajari
- Department of Hematology and Blood Banking, School of Allied Medical SciencesShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Mahsa Shirin
- Department of Hematology and Blood Banking, School of Allied Medical SciencesShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Atieh Pourbagheri‐Sigaroodi
- Department of Hematology and Blood Banking, School of Allied Medical SciencesShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari
- Cancer Research Center, Department of General SurgeryShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Hassan Abolghasemi
- Pediatric Congenital Hematologic Disorders Research Center, Mofid HospitalShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Davood Bashash
- Department of Hematology and Blood Banking, School of Allied Medical SciencesShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wiethorn EE, Harrison S, Weeda ER, Bell CM. Effectiveness and Safety of Twice- Versus Thrice-Daily Subcutaneous Heparin for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis at a Large Academic Medical Center. Ann Pharmacother 2021; 56:541-547. [PMID: 34459268 DOI: 10.1177/10600280211041380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dosing variation of subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (UFH) exist for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (VTEP). OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of thrice-daily (TID) versus twice-daily (BID) administration of UFH during a heparin shortage for VTEP. METHODS A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted in patients with orders for BID subcutaneous UFH during a heparin shortage from September 1, 2019, to February 4, 2020. These patients were matched to patients with TID subcutaneous UFH orders from January 1, 2019, to May 31, 2019. The primary outcome was the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism confirmed by imaging during hospitalization. The secondary outcome was the incidence of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events as defined by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) definitions. RESULTS A total of 277 patients with orders for BID UFH and meeting inclusion criteria were evaluated and matched to patients who received TID UFH. After the exclusion criteria were implemented, 510 patients remained in the TID group. The primary outcome occurred in 4% of patients in the BID group and 3% in the TID group (P = 0.645). Major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events occurred in 10% of patients in the BID group and 8% in the TID group (P = 0.310). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE There was no difference in effectiveness or safety of TID versus BID subcutaneous UFH for VTEP. During a heparin shortage, transitioning patients to BID UFH for VTEP to conserve supply may be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarah Harrison
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Erin R Weeda
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Shaw RJ, Bradbury C, Abrams ST, Wang G, Toh CH. COVID-19 and immunothrombosis: emerging understanding and clinical management. Br J Haematol 2021; 194:518-529. [PMID: 34114204 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.17664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has been the most significant health crisis in recent global history. Early studies from Wuhan highlighted COVID-19-associated coagulopathy and a significant association with mortality was soon recognised. As research continues across the world, more evidence is emerging of the cross-talk between the innate immune system, coagulation activation and inflammation. Immunothrombosis has been demonstrated to play a key role in the pathophysiology of severe COVID-19, with extracellular histones and neutrophil extracellular traps detected in the plasma and cardiopulmonary tissues of critically ill patients. Targeting the components of immunothrombosis is becoming an important factor in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 infection. Recent studies report outcomes of intermediate and therapeutic anticoagulation in hospitalised patients with varying severities of COVID-19 disease, including optimal dosing and associated bleeding risks. Immunomodulatory therapies, including corticosteroids and IL-6 receptor antagonists, have been demonstrated to significantly reduce mortality in COVID-19 patients. As the pandemic continues, more studies are required to understand the driving factors and upstream mechanisms for coagulopathy and immunothrombosis in COVID-19, and thus potentially develop more targeted therapies for SARS-CoV-2 infection, both in the acute phase and in those who develop longer-term symptom burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J Shaw
- Department of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- The Roald Dahl Haemostasis and Thrombosis Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Simon T Abrams
- Department of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Guozheng Wang
- Department of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Cheng-Hock Toh
- Department of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- The Roald Dahl Haemostasis and Thrombosis Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
What Do We Know about Thromboprophylaxis and Its Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients? Biomedicines 2021; 9:biomedicines9080864. [PMID: 34440068 PMCID: PMC8389559 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9080864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is an important complication in patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICU). Thromboprophylaxis is mainly performed with Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) and, in some specific patients, with Unfractionated Heparin (UFH). These intensive units are an environment where individual patient variability is extreme and where traditional antithrombotic protocols are frequently ineffective. This was known for a long time, but the hospitalization of many patients with COVID-19 inflammatory storms suddenly highlighted this knowledge. It is therefore reasonable to propose variable antithrombotic prevention protocols based initially on a series of individual criteria (weight, BMI, and thrombotic risks). Secondly, they should be adjusted by the monitoring of anticoagulant activity, preferably by measuring the anti-Xa activity. However, we still face unresolved questions, such as once- or twice-daily LMWH injections, monitoring at the peak and/or trough, and poorly defined therapeutic targets. Equally surprisingly, we observed a lack of standardization of the anti-Xa activity kits.
Collapse
|
27
|
Malguria N, Yen LH, Lin T, Hussein A, Fishman EK. Role of Chest CT in COVID-19. J Clin Imaging Sci 2021; 11:30. [PMID: 34221639 PMCID: PMC8247924 DOI: 10.25259/jcis_138_2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
In December 2019, a disease attributed to a new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), broke out in Wuhan, China and has spread rapidly throughout the world. CT has been advocated in selected indications as a tool toward rapid and early diagnosis. The CT patterns of COVID-19 include ground glass opacities GGO, consolidation, and crazy paving. Additional signs include a “rounded morphology” of lesions, vascular enlargement sign, nodules, and fibrous stripe. Signs of healing and organization include subpleural bands, a reticular pattern, reversed halo sign and traction bronchiectasis. Cavitation and tree in bud signs are absent and pleural effusions are rare. There is a high incidence of pulmonary embolism associated with COVID-19. CT findings in COVID-19 appear to follow a predictable timeline with maximal involvement approximately 6–11 days after symptom onset. The stages of evolution include early stage (days 0–4) with GGO being the predominant abnormality, progressive stage (days 5–8) with increasing crazy paving; and peak stage (days 9–13) with predominance of consolidation and absorption phase (after day 14) with gradual absorption of consolidation with residual GGO and subpleural bands. CT findings in COVID-19 have a high sensitivity and low specificity, determined to be 98% and 25% in a retrospective study of 1014 patients. The low specificity of CT for the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia is due to the overlap of CT findings with other viral pneumonias and other infections, lung involvement in connective tissue disorders, drug reaction, pulmonary edema, and hemorrhage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nagina Malguria
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Li-Hsiang Yen
- Department of Radiology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States
| | - Tony Lin
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Amira Hussein
- Department of Radiology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States
| | - Elliot K Fishman
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jalde FC, Beckman MO, Svensson AM, Bell M, Sköld M, Strand F, Nyren S, Kistner A. Widespread Parenchymal Abnormalities and Pulmonary Embolism on Contrast-Enhanced CT Predict Disease Severity and Mortality in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:666723. [PMID: 34268322 PMCID: PMC8275973 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.666723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Severe COVID-19 is associated with inflammation, thromboembolic disease, and high mortality. We studied factors associated with fatal outcomes in consecutive COVID-19 patients examined by computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA). Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort analysis included 130 PCR-positive patients hospitalized for COVID-19 [35 women and 95 men, median age 57 years (interquartile range 51–64)] with suspected pulmonary embolism based on clinical suspicion. The presence and extent of embolism and parenchymal abnormalities on CTPA were recorded. The severity of pulmonary parenchymal involvement was stratified by two experienced radiologists into two groups: lesions affecting ≤50% or >50% of the parenchyma. Patient characteristics, radiological aspects, laboratory parameters, and 60-day mortality data were collected. Results: Pulmonary embolism was present in 26% of the patients. Most emboli were small and peripheral. Patients with widespread parenchymal abnormalities, with or without pulmonary embolism, had increased main pulmonary artery diameter (p < 0.05) and higher C-reactive protein (p < 0.01), D-dimer (p < 0.01), and troponin T (p < 0.001) and lower hemoglobin (p < 0.001). A wider main pulmonary artery diameter correlated positively with C-reactive protein (r = 0.28, p = 0.001, and n = 130) and procalcitonin. In a multivariant analysis, D-dimer >7.2 mg/L [odds ratio (±95% confidence interval) 4.1 (1.4–12.0)] and ICU stay were significantly associated with embolism (p < 0.001). The highest 60-day mortality was found in patients with widespread parenchymal abnormalities combined with pulmonary embolism (36%), followed by patients with widespread parenchymal abnormalities without pulmonary embolism (26%). In multivariate analysis, high troponin T, D-dimer, and plasma creatinine and widespread parenchymal abnormalities on CT were associated with 60-day mortality. Conclusions: Pulmonary embolism combined with widespread parenchymal abnormalities contributed to mortality risk in COVID-19. Elevated C-reactive protein, D-dimer, troponin-T, P-creatinine, and enlarged pulmonary artery were associated with a worse outcome and may mirror a more severe systemic disease. A liberal approach to radiological investigation should be recommended at clinical deterioration, when the situation allows it. Computed tomography imaging, even without intravenous contrast to assess the severity of pulmonary infiltrates, are of value to predict outcome in COVID-19. Better radiological techniques with higher resolution could potentially improve the detection of microthromboses. This could influence anticoagulant treatment strategies, preventing clinical detoriation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Campoccia Jalde
- Department of Anesthesiology, Surgical Services and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mats O Beckman
- Department of Radiology, Solna, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ann Mari Svensson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Radiology, Solna, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Max Bell
- Department of Anesthesiology, Surgical Services and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Magnus Sköld
- Respiratory Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine Solna and Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Strand
- Department of Radiology, Solna, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sven Nyren
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Radiology, Solna, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Kistner
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Moll M, Connors JM. When to use anticoagulation in COVID-19. Thromb Res 2021; 204:136-137. [PMID: 34176588 PMCID: PMC8206570 DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Moll
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America
| | - Jean M Connors
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America; Division of Hematology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Cai Y, Ye LP, Song YQ, Mao XL, Wang L, Jiang YZ, Que WT, Li SW. Liver injury in COVID-19: Detection, pathogenesis, and treatment. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:3022-3036. [PMID: 34168405 PMCID: PMC8192279 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i22.3022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In the early December 2019, a novel coronavirus named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was first reported in Wuhan, China, followed by an outbreak that spread around the world. Numerous studies have shown that liver injury is common in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and may aggravate the severity of the disease. However, the exact cause and specific mechanism of COVID-associated liver injury needs to be elucidated further. In this review, we present an analysis of the clinical features, potential mechanisms, and treatment strategies for liver injury associated with COVID-19. We hope that this review would benefit clinicians in devising better strategies for management of such patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Cai
- Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Techniques & Rapid Rehabilitation of Digestive System Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai 317000, Zhejiang Province, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai 317000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Li-Ping Ye
- Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Techniques & Rapid Rehabilitation of Digestive System Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai 317000, Zhejiang Province, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai 317000, Zhejiang Province, China
- School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Ya-Qi Song
- School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xin-Li Mao
- Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Techniques & Rapid Rehabilitation of Digestive System Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai 317000, Zhejiang Province, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai 317000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Li Wang
- College of Basic Medicine, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010000, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China
| | - Yan-Zhi Jiang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200000, China
| | - Wei-Tao Que
- Department of Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200000, China
| | - Shao-Wei Li
- Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Techniques & Rapid Rehabilitation of Digestive System Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai 317000, Zhejiang Province, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai 317000, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Prediction of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism in Critically Ill Patients: The ICU-Venous Thromboembolism Score. Crit Care Med 2021; 48:e470-e479. [PMID: 32187076 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify risk factors and develop a prediction score for in-hospital symptomatic venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Henry Ford Health System, a five-hospital system including 18 ICUs. PATIENTS We obtained data from the electronic medical record of all adult patients admitted to any ICU (total 264 beds) between January 2015 and March 2018. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Symptomatic venous thromboembolism was defined as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or both, diagnosed greater than 24 hours after ICU admission and confirmed by ultrasound, CT, or nuclear medicine imaging. A prediction score (the ICU-Venous Thromboembolism score) was derived from independent risk factors identified using multivariable logistic regression. Of 37,050 patients who met the eligibility criteria, 529 patients (1.4%) developed symptomatic venous thromboembolism. The ICU-Venous Thromboembolism score consists of six independent predictors: central venous catheterization (5 points), immobilization greater than or equal to 4 days (4 points), prior history of venous thromboembolism (4 points), mechanical ventilation (2 points), lowest hemoglobin during hospitalization greater than or equal to 9 g/dL (2 points), and platelet count at admission greater than 250,000/μL (1 point). Patients with a score of 0-8 (76% of the sample) had a low (0.3%) risk of venous thromboembolism; those with a score of 9-14 (22%) had an intermediate (3.6%) risk of venous thromboembolism (hazard ratio, 6.7; 95% CI, 5.3-8.4); and those with a score of 15-18 (2%) had a high (17.7%) risk of venous thromboembolism (hazard ratio, 28.1; 95% CI, 21.7-36.5). The overall C-statistic of the model was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.85-0.88). CONCLUSIONS Clinically diagnosed symptomatic venous thromboembolism occurred in 1.4% of this large population of ICU patients with high adherence to chemoprophylaxis. Central venous catheterization and immobilization are potentially modifiable risk factors for venous thromboembolism. The ICU-Venous Thromboembolism score can identify patients at increased risk for venous thromboembolism.
Collapse
|
32
|
Leentjens J, van Haaps TF, Wessels PF, Schutgens REG, Middeldorp S. COVID-19-associated coagulopathy and antithrombotic agents-lessons after 1 year. LANCET HAEMATOLOGY 2021; 8:e524-e533. [PMID: 33930350 PMCID: PMC8078884 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(21)00105-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
COVID-19 is associated with a high incidence of thrombotic complications, which can be explained by the complex and unique interplay between coronaviruses and endothelial cells, the local and systemic inflammatory response, and the coagulation system. Empirically, an intensified dose of thrombosis prophylaxis is being used in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 and several guidelines on this topic have been published, although the insufficiency of high quality and direct evidence has led to weak recommendations. In this Viewpoint we summarise the pathophysiology of COVID-19 coagulopathy in the context of patients who are ambulant, admitted to hospital, and critically ill or non-critically ill, and those post-discharge from hospital. We also review data from randomised controlled trials in the past year of antithrombotic therapy in patients who are critically ill. These data provide the first high-quality evidence on optimal use of antithrombotic therapy in patients with COVID-19. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis is not routinely recommended for patients who are ambulant and post-discharge. A first ever trial in non-critically ill patients who were admitted to hospital has shown that a therapeutic dose of low-molecular-weight heparin might improve clinical outcomes in this population. In critically ill patients, this same treatment does not improve outcomes and prophylactic dose anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis is recommended. In the upcoming months we expect numerous data from the ongoing antithrombotic COVID-19 studies to guide clinicians at different stages of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenneke Leentjens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
| | - Thijs F van Haaps
- Department of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Pieter F Wessels
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; Ampath Laboratories, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Roger E G Schutgens
- Van Creveldkliniek, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Saskia Middeldorp
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Munner MS, Ritchie CA, Elkhidir IH, Mohammadat DT, Ahmed HJ, Altayeb KA, Yassin RZ, Hassan RM, Hamad SA, Nimir M, Hamid OS, Johnson MM, Narula T, Erben Y, Tawk RG, Miller DA, Gupta V, Devcic Z, Freeman WD, Toskich BB. Incidence of acute pulmonary embolism among patients hospitalized with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. F1000Res 2021. [DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.27425.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic, which is associated with venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism (PE). This study aimed to estimate the pooled incidence of PE among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 within the published literature. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. An electronic search using MEDLINE /PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, and OpenGray databases was conducted May 19th, 2020. Eligible studies included sufficient data to calculate the incidence of PE diagnosed during hospitalization in patients with COVID-19. Case reports were excluded. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (observational cohort and case-control), AXIS tool (cross-sectional), and quality assessment tool (case series). Demographics and PE incidence data were extracted from the included studies and analyzed with R language. The pooled incidence of PE in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 was calculated. Results: The database search identified 128 records. Ten observational studies were eligible and were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 1722 patients (mean age= 63.36). .The incidence of PE was noted to be higher in males. The D-dimer levels were specified between PE group and non-PE group in only three studies, while the remaining either reported it improperly or had missing data.The pooled PE incidence in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 was 17% (95% CI: 0.1-0.26). There was a high degree of study heterogeneity (I2 = 94%, p<0.01). Conclusion: The pooled PE incidence in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 is 17%. This increased incidence is greater than that previously reported in the general population of non-COVID-19. Attention and further investigation of this risk is warranted.
Collapse
|
34
|
Nalbandian A, Sehgal K, Gupta A, Madhavan MV, McGroder C, Stevens JS, Cook JR, Nordvig AS, Shalev D, Sehrawat TS, Ahluwalia N, Bikdeli B, Dietz D, Der-Nigoghossian C, Liyanage-Don N, Rosner GF, Bernstein EJ, Mohan S, Beckley AA, Seres DS, Choueiri TK, Uriel N, Ausiello JC, Accili D, Freedberg DE, Baldwin M, Schwartz A, Brodie D, Garcia CK, Elkind MSV, Connors JM, Bilezikian JP, Landry DW, Wan EY. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat Med 2021; 27:601-615. [PMID: 33753937 PMCID: PMC8893149 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-021-01283-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2944] [Impact Index Per Article: 736.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the pathogen responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which has resulted in global healthcare crises and strained health resources. As the population of patients recovering from COVID-19 grows, it is paramount to establish an understanding of the healthcare issues surrounding them. COVID-19 is now recognized as a multi-organ disease with a broad spectrum of manifestations. Similarly to post-acute viral syndromes described in survivors of other virulent coronavirus epidemics, there are increasing reports of persistent and prolonged effects after acute COVID-19. Patient advocacy groups, many members of which identify themselves as long haulers, have helped contribute to the recognition of post-acute COVID-19, a syndrome characterized by persistent symptoms and/or delayed or long-term complications beyond 4 weeks from the onset of symptoms. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the current literature on post-acute COVID-19, its pathophysiology and its organ-specific sequelae. Finally, we discuss relevant considerations for the multidisciplinary care of COVID-19 survivors and propose a framework for the identification of those at high risk for post-acute COVID-19 and their coordinated management through dedicated COVID-19 clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ani Nalbandian
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kartik Sehgal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Aakriti Gupta
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
- Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Mahesh V Madhavan
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
- Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA
| | - Claire McGroder
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jacob S Stevens
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joshua R Cook
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anna S Nordvig
- Department of Neurology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Daniel Shalev
- Department of Psychiatry, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tejasav S Sehrawat
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Neha Ahluwalia
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Behnood Bikdeli
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Donald Dietz
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Caroline Der-Nigoghossian
- Clinical Pharmacy, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nadia Liyanage-Don
- Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gregg F Rosner
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Elana J Bernstein
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Akinpelumi A Beckley
- Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - David S Seres
- Institute of Human Nutrition and Division of Preventive Medicine and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nir Uriel
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - John C Ausiello
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Domenico Accili
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Daniel E Freedberg
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Matthew Baldwin
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Allan Schwartz
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Daniel Brodie
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Christine Kim Garcia
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mitchell S V Elkind
- Department of Neurology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jean M Connors
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Hematology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John P Bilezikian
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Donald W Landry
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Elaine Y Wan
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kumano O, Akatsuchi K, Amiral J. Updates on Anticoagulation and Laboratory Tools for Therapy Monitoring of Heparin, Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants. Biomedicines 2021; 9:biomedicines9030264. [PMID: 33799956 PMCID: PMC7998518 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9030264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Anticoagulant drugs have been used to prevent and treat thrombosis. However, they are associated with risk of hemorrhage. Therefore, prior to their clinical use, it is important to assess the risk of bleeding and thrombosis. In case of older anticoagulant drugs like heparin and warfarin, dose adjustment is required owing to narrow therapeutic ranges. The established monitoring methods for heparin and warfarin are activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)/anti-Xa assay and prothrombin time – international normalized ratio (PT-INR), respectively. Since 2008, new generation anticoagulant drugs, called direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), have been widely prescribed to prevent and treat several thromboembolic diseases. Although the use of DOACs without routine monitoring and frequent dose adjustment has been shown to be safe and effective, there may be clinical circumstances in specific patients when measurement of the anticoagulant effects of DOACs is required. Recently, anticoagulation therapy has received attention when treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of anticoagulant drugs—heparin, warfarin, and DOACs and describe the methods used for the measurement of their effects. In addition, we discuss the latest findings on thrombosis mechanism in patients with COVID-19 with respect to biological chemistry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osamu Kumano
- Research Department, HYPHEN BioMed, 155 Rue d’Eragny, 95000 Neuville sur Oise, France;
- Protein Technology, Engineering 1, Sysmex Corporation, Kobe 651-2271, Japan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-78-991-2203
| | - Kohei Akatsuchi
- R&D Division, Sysmex R&D Center Americas, Inc., Mundelein, IL 60060, USA;
| | - Jean Amiral
- Research Department, HYPHEN BioMed, 155 Rue d’Eragny, 95000 Neuville sur Oise, France;
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Erstad BL, Barletta JF. Drug dosing in the critically ill obese patient: a focus on medications for hemodynamic support and prophylaxis. Crit Care 2021; 25:77. [PMID: 33622380 PMCID: PMC7901103 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03495-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Medications used for supportive care or prophylaxis constitute a significant portion of drug utilization in the intensive care unit. Evidence-based guidelines are available for many aspects of supportive care but drug doses listed are typically for patients with normal body habitus and not morbid obesity. Failure to account for the pharmacokinetic changes that occur with obesity can lead to an incorrect dose and treatment failure or toxicity. This paper is intended to help clinicians design initial dosing regimens in critically ill obese patients for medications commonly used for hemodynamic support or prophylaxis. A detailed literature search of medications used for supportive care or prophylaxis listed in practice guidelines was conducted with an emphasis on obesity, pharmacokinetics and dosing. Relevant manuscripts were reviewed and strategies for dosing are provided. For medications used for hemodynamic support, a similar strategy can be used as in non-obese patients. Similarly, medications for stress ulcer prophylaxis do not need to be adjusted. Anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, on the other hand, require an individualized approach where higher doses are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian L Erstad
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, 1295 N Martin Ave, PO Box 210202, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA
| | - Jeffrey F Barletta
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Midwestern University, 19555 N 59th Ave, Glendale, AZ, 85308, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
de Oliveira RMF, de Souza Aguiar PHC, de Paula RWRM, Simões CEN, Almeida LG, Barceló A, Galil AGDS. Stroke in patients infected by the novel coronavirus and its causal mechanisms: A narrative review. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open 2021; 2:e12332. [PMID: 33521783 PMCID: PMC7821611 DOI: 10.1002/emp2.12332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 11/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The current study aimed to evaluate the mechanisms of stroke development during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and analyze the related characteristics, such as etiology, age group, associated comorbidities, and prognosis. METHODS A narrative was performed using the descriptors ["novel coronavirus"] AND ["stroke"] in the PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar, Lilacs, and Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS) databases, including studies published between December 1, 2019, and April 28, 2020. RESULTS A total of 142 articles were identified, with 89 of them in the PubMed database, 46 in Science Direct, and 7 in Google Scholar. No articles were found using the defined keywords in the Lilacs and BVS databases. A total of 22 articles were included for final evaluation. We observed that infection by the novel coronavirus caused a greater risk of the occurrence of stroke, with several studies suggesting etiological mechanisms, such as the involvement of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, viral invasion, and hypoxia as well as the increase in D-dimer and the reduction in platelets, which had been commonly observed in COVID-19 cases. The most common complication of stroke was found among the elderly with preexisting comorbidities, mainly cardiovascular disease. We detected reports of strokes among young people with no preexisting risk factors for thromboembolic events, in which the mechanism related to the viral infection was the most probable cause. In this review, we confirmed that stroke is part of the spectrum of clinical manifestations resulting from COVID-19 and is associated with a worse prognosis. Cerebrovascular lesions resulting from complications of the infection by the novel coronavirus occurred as a result of ischemic, hemorrhagic, and/or thromboembolic etiologies. CONCLUSION The occurrence of stroke during the pandemic as a result of the novel coronavirus has a multifactorial character, and emergency physicians should focus on systematic measures for its screening and accurate diagnosis as well as on appropriate interventions based on early decisionmaking that may have a favorable impact on reducing damage and saving lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Lucas Garrido Almeida
- Faculty of MedicineFederal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF)Juiz de ForaMinas GeraisBrazil
| | - Alberto Barceló
- Department of Public Health ScienceUniversity of MiamiMiamiFloridaUSA
- Internship Department–Medical School, Federal University of Juiz de ForaJuiz de Fora (UFJF)Minas GeraisBrazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kory P, Meduri GU, Iglesias J, Varon J, Marik PE. Clinical and Scientific Rationale for the "MATH+" Hospital Treatment Protocol for COVID-19. J Intensive Care Med 2021; 36:135-156. [PMID: 33317385 DOI: 10.1177/0885066620973585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
In December 2019, COVID-19, a severe respiratory illness caused by the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) emerged in Wuhan, China. The greatest impact that COVID-19 had was on intensive care units (ICUs), given that approximately 20% of hospitalized cases developed acute respiratory failure (ARF) requiring ICU admission. Based on the assumption that COVID-19 represented a viral pneumonia and no anti-coronaviral therapy existed, nearly all national and international health care societies' recommended "supportive care only" avoiding other therapies outside of randomized controlled trials, with a specific prohibition against the use of corticosteroids in treatment. However, early studies of COVID-19-associated ARF reported inexplicably high mortality rates, with frequent prolonged durations of mechanical ventilation (MV), even from centers expert in such supportive care strategies. These reports led the authors to form a clinical expert panel called the Front-Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (www.flccc.net). The panel collaboratively reviewed the emerging clinical, radiographic, and pathological reports of COVID-19 while initiating multiple discussions among a wide clinical network of front-line clinical ICU experts from initial outbreak areas in China, Italy, and New York. Based on the shared early impressions of "what was working and what wasn't working," the increasing medical journal publications and the rapidly accumulating personal clinical experiences with COVID-19 patients, a treatment protocol was created for the hospitalized patients based on the core therapies of methylprednisolone, ascorbic acid, thiamine, heparin and co-interventions (MATH+). This manuscript reviews the scientific and clinical rationale behind MATH+ based on published in-vitro, pre-clinical, and clinical data in support of each medicine, with a special emphasis of studies supporting their use in the treatment of patients with viral syndromes and COVID-19 specifically. The review concludes with a comparison of published multi-national mortality data with MATH+ center outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Kory
- 22392Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - G Umberto Meduri
- Memphis VA Medical Center, 12326University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Jose Iglesias
- Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Hackensack School of Medicine at Seton Hall, NJ, USA
| | - Joseph Varon
- 12340University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul E Marik
- 6040Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Eck RJ, Hulshof L, Wiersema R, Thio CHL, Hiemstra B, van den Oever NCG, Gans ROB, van der Horst ICC, Meijer K, Keus F. Incidence, prognostic factors, and outcomes of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients: data from two prospective cohort studies. Crit Care 2021; 25:27. [PMID: 33436012 PMCID: PMC7801861 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03457-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence, incidence, prognostic factors, and outcomes of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients receiving contemporary thrombosis prophylaxis. METHODS We conducted a pooled analysis of two prospective cohort studies. The outcomes of interest were in-hospital pulmonary embolism or lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (PE-LDVT), in-hospital nonleg deep vein thrombosis (NLDVT), and 90-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between predefined baseline prognostic factors and PE-LDVT or NLDVT. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between PE-LDVT or NLDVT and 90-day mortality. RESULTS A total of 2208 patients were included. The prevalence of any venous thromboembolism during 3 months before ICU admission was 3.6% (95% CI 2.8-4.4%). Out of 2166 patients, 47 (2.2%; 95% CI 1.6-2.9%) developed PE-LDVT and 38 patients (1.8%; 95% CI 1.2-2.4%) developed NLDVT. Renal replacement therapy (OR 3.5 95% CI 1.4-8.6), respiratory failure (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.1-3.8), and previous VTE (OR 3.6; 95% CI 1.7-7.7) were associated with PE-LDVT. Central venous catheters (OR 5.4; 95% CI 1.7-17.8) and infection (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.1-4.3) were associated with NLDVT. Occurrence of PE-LDVT but not NLDVT was associated with increased 90-day mortality (HR 2.7; 95% CI 1.6-4.6, respectively, 0.92; 95% CI 0.41-2.1). CONCLUSION Thrombotic events are common in critically ill patients, both before and after ICU admittance. Development of PE-LDVT but not NLDVT was associated with increased mortality. Prognostic factors for developing PE-LDVT or NLDVT despite prophylaxis can be identified at ICU admission and may be used to select patients at higher risk in future randomized clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03773939.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben J Eck
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Lisa Hulshof
- Department of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Critical Care, Treant Zorggroep Emmen, Emmen, The Netherlands
| | - Renske Wiersema
- Department of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Chris H L Thio
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Hiemstra
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Reinold O B Gans
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Iwan C C van der Horst
- Department of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Karina Meijer
- Department of Haematology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Keus
- Department of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Gallastegui N, Zhou JY, von Drygalski A, Barnes RFW, Fernandes TM, Morris TA. Pulmonary Embolism Does Not Have an Unusually High Incidence Among Hospitalized COVID19 Patients. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2021; 27:1076029621996471. [PMID: 33689493 PMCID: PMC8718167 DOI: 10.1177/1076029621996471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Acute respiratory illnesses from COVID19 infection are increasing globally. Reports from earlier in the pandemic suggested that patients hospitalized for COVID19 are at particularly high risk for pulmonary embolism (PE). To estimate the incidences of PE during hospitalization for COVID19, we performed a rigorous systematic review of published literature. METHODS We searched for case series, cohort studies and clinical trials from December 1, 2019 to July 13, 2020 that reported the incidence of PE among consecutive patients who were hospitalized for COVID19 in ICUs and in non-ICU hospital wards. To reflect the general population of hospitalized COVID19 patients, we excluded studies in which subject enrollment was linked to the clinical suspicion for venous thromboembolism (VTE). RESULTS Fifty-seven studies were included in the analysis. The combined random effects estimate of PE incidence among all hospitalized COVID19 patients was 7.1% (95% CI: 5.2%, 9.1%). Studies with larger sample sizes reported significantly lower PE incidences than smaller studies (r2 = 0.161, p = 0.036). The PE incidence among studies that included 400 or more patients was 3.0% (95% CI: 1.7%, 4.6%). Among COVID19 patients admitted to ICUs, the combined estimated PE incidence was 13.7% (95% CI: 8.0%, 20.6%). The incidence of ICU-related PE also decreased as the study sample sizes increased. The single largest COVID19 ICU study (n = 2215) disclosed a PE incidence of 2.3% (95% CI: 1.7%, 3.0%). CONCLUSION PE incidences among hospitalized COVID19 patients are much lower than has been previously postulated based on smaller, often biased study reports. The incidence of "microthrombosis," leading to occlusion of microscopic blood vessels, remains unknown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Gallastegui
- University of California San Diego, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, La Jolla CA, USA
| | - Jenny Y. Zhou
- University of California San Diego, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, La Jolla CA, USA
| | - Annette von Drygalski
- University of California San Diego, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, La Jolla CA, USA
- The Scripps Research Institute, Department of Molecular Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Richard F. W. Barnes
- University of California San Diego, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, La Jolla CA, USA
| | - Timothy M. Fernandes
- University of California San Diego, Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Timothy A. Morris
- University of California San Diego, Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sebuhyan M, Mirailles R, Crichi B, Frere C, Bonnin P, Bergeron-Lafaurie A, Denis B, Liegeon G, Peyrony O, Farge D. How to screen and diagnose deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in patients hospitalized for or suspected of COVID-19 infection, outside the intensive care units. JOURNAL DE MEDECINE VASCULAIRE 2020; 45:334-343. [PMID: 33248536 PMCID: PMC7473249 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdmv.2020.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Coronavirus disease-2019 outbreak (COVID-19) has been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. Studies report both a severe inflammatory syndrome and a procoagulant state in severe COVID-19 cases, with an increase of venous thromboembolism, including pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). In this context, we discuss the use of doppler ultrasonography (DUS) in the screening and diagnosis of DVT in ambulatory and hospitalized patients with, or suspected of having, COVID-19, outside the intensive care unit (ICU). MATERIAL AND METHODS Non-systematic review of the literature. RESULTS In patients hospitalized for or suspected of COVID-19 infection with the presence of either (a) DVT clinical symptoms, (b) a strong DVT clinical probability (Wells score>2) or (c) elevated D-dimer levels without DVT clinical symptoms and without PE on lung CT angio-scan, DVT should be investigated with DUS. In the presence of PE diagnosed clinically and/or radiologically, additional systematic DVT screening using DUS is not recommended during the COVID-19 pandemic. The use of 4-points compression DUS for DVT screen and diagnosis is the most appropriate method in this context. DISCUSSION Systematic DUS for DVT screening in asymptomatic COVID patients is not recommended unless the patient is in the ICU. This would increase the risk of unnecessarily exposing medical staff to SARS-CoV-2 and monopolizing limited resources during this period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Sebuhyan
- Unité de médecine interne : maladies auto-immunes et pathologie vasculaire (UF04), hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France.
| | - R Mirailles
- Unité de médecine interne : maladies auto-immunes et pathologie vasculaire (UF04), hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - B Crichi
- Unité de médecine interne : maladies auto-immunes et pathologie vasculaire (UF04), hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - C Frere
- Inserm UMRS_1166, service d'hématologie biologique, Sorbonne université, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - P Bonnin
- Service de physiologie clinique et explorations fonctionnelles, hôpital Lariboisière, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - A Bergeron-Lafaurie
- Service de pneumologie, hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance publique-hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - B Denis
- Service de maladie infectieuse, hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - G Liegeon
- Service de maladie infectieuse, hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - O Peyrony
- Service des urgences, hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - D Farge
- Unité de médecine interne : maladies auto-immunes et pathologie vasculaire (UF04), hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France; IRSL, EA-3518, recherche clinique appliquée à l'hématologie, université de Paris, 75010 Paris, France; Department of medicine, McGill university, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Dobesh PP, Trujillo TC. Coagulopathy, Venous Thromboembolism, and Anticoagulation in Patients with COVID-19. Pharmacotherapy 2020; 40:1130-1151. [PMID: 33006163 PMCID: PMC7537066 DOI: 10.1002/phar.2465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) has led to a worldwide pandemic, and patients with the infection are referred to as having COVID‐19. Although COVID‐19 is commonly considered a respiratory disease, there is clearly a thrombotic potential that was not expected. The pathophysiology of the disease and subsequent coagulopathy produce an inflammatory, hypercoagulable, and hypofibrinolytic state. Several observational studies have demonstrated surprisingly high rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in both general ward and intensive care patients with COVID‐19. Many of these observational studies demonstrate high rates of VTE despite patients being on standard, or even higher intensity, pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. Fibrinolytic therapy has also been used in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Unfortunately, high quality randomized controlled trials are lacking. A literature search was performed to provide the most up‐to‐date information on the pathophysiology, coagulopathy, risk of VTE, and prevention and treatment of VTE in patients with COVID‐19. These topics are reviewed in detail, along with practical issues of anticoagulant selection and duration. Although many international organizations have produced guidelines or consensus statements, they do not all cover the same issues regarding anticoagulant therapy for patients with COVID‐19, and they do not all agree. These statements and the most recent literature are combined into a list of clinical considerations that clinicians can use for the prevention and treatment of VTE in patients with COVID‐19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul P Dobesh
- College of Pharmacy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Toby C Trujillo
- University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hasan SS, Radford S, Kow CS, Zaidi STR. Venous thromboembolism in critically ill COVID-19 patients receiving prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2020; 50:814-821. [PMID: 32748122 PMCID: PMC7396456 DOI: 10.1007/s11239-020-02235-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Many aspects of care such as management of hypercoagulable state in COVID-19 patients, especially those admitted to intensive care units is challenging in the rapidly evolving pandemic of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We seek to systematically review the available evidence regarding the anticoagulation approach to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) among COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units. Electronic databases were searched for studies reporting venous thromboembolic events in patients admitted to the intensive care unit receiving any type of anticoagulation (prophylactic or therapeutic). The pooled prevalence (and 95% confidence interval [CI]) of VTE among patients receiving anticoagulant were calculated using the random-effects model. Subgroup pooled analyses were performed with studies reported prophylactic anticoagulation alone and with studies reported mixed prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation. We included twelve studies (8 Europe; 2 UK; 1 each from the US and China) in our systematic review and meta-analysis. All studies utilized LMWH or unfractionated heparin as their pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, either prophylactic doses or therapeutic doses. Seven studies reported on the proportion of patients with the previous history of VTE (range 0-10%). The pooled prevalence of VTE among ICU patients receiving prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation across all studies was 31% (95% CI 20-43%). Subgroup pooled analysis limited to studies reported prophylactic anticoagulation alone and mixed (therapeutic and prophylactic anticoagulation) reported pooled prevalences of VTE of 38% (95% CI 10-70%) and 27% (95% CI 17-40%) respectively. With a high prevalence of thromboprophylaxis failure among COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units, individualised rather than protocolised VTE thromboprophylaxis would appear prudent at interim.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed Shahzad Hasan
- School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.
| | - Sam Radford
- Intensive Care Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Chia Siang Kow
- School of Postgraduate Studies, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Syed Tabish Razi Zaidi
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Higher Intensity Thromboprophylaxis Regimens and Pulmonary Embolism in Critically Ill Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients. Crit Care Med 2020; 48:e1087-e1090. [PMID: 32769623 PMCID: PMC7437413 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. To assess the role of thromboprophylaxis regimens on the occurrence of pulmonary embolism in coronavirus disease 2019 patients.
Collapse
|
45
|
Sorgi MW, Roach E, Bauer SR, Bass S, Militello M, Welch S, Lam S, Reddy AJ, Torbic H. Effectiveness and Safety of Twice Daily Versus Thrice Daily Subcutaneous Unfractionated Heparin for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis at a Tertiary Medical Center. J Pharm Pract 2020; 35:190-196. [PMID: 33016183 DOI: 10.1177/0897190020961210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The direct comparison of twice daily (BID) and thrice daily (TID) dosing of subcutaneous low dose unfractionated heparin (LDUH) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in a mixed inpatient population is not well-studied. OBJECTIVE This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of BID compared to TID dosing of LDUH for prevention of VTE. METHODS Retrospective, single-center analysis of patients who received LDUH for VTE prophylaxis between July and September 2015. Outcomes were identified by ICD-9 codes. A matched cohort was created using propensity scores and multivariate analysis was conducted to identify independent risk factors for VTE. The primary outcome was incidence of symptomatic VTE. RESULTS In the full cohort, VTE occurred in 0.71% of patients who received LDUH BID compared to 0.77% of patients who received LDUH TID (p = 0.85). There was no difference in major (p = 0.85) and minor (p = 0.52) bleeding between the BID and TID groups. For the matched cohort, VTE occurred in 1.4% of BID patients and 2.1% of TID patients (p = 0.32). Major bleed occurred in 0.36% of BID patients and 0.52% of TID patients (p = 0.7), while a minor bleed was seen in 3.4% of BID patients and 2.1% of TID patients (p = 0.13). Personal history of VTE (p = 0.002) and weight (p = 0.035) were independently associated with increased risk of VTE. CONCLUSION This study did not demonstrate a difference in effectiveness or safety between BID and TID dosing of LDUH for VTE prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan W Sorgi
- EHP Pharmacy Management, Cleveland Clinic, Independence, OH, USA
| | - Erin Roach
- Department of Pharmacy, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Seth R Bauer
- Department of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Stephanie Bass
- Department of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Sarah Welch
- Department of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Simon Lam
- Department of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Anita J Reddy
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Heather Torbic
- Department of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Chen EC, Zon RL, Battinelli EM, Connors JM. Approach to the Patient with COVID-19-Associated Thrombosis: A Case-Based Review. Oncologist 2020; 25:e1500-e1508. [PMID: 32881209 PMCID: PMC7461375 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a current global pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Alongside its potential to cause severe respiratory illness, studies have reported a distinct COVID-19-associated coagulopathy that is characterized by elevated D-dimer levels, hyperfibrinogenemia, mild thrombocytopenia, and slight prolongation of the prothrombin time. Studies have also reported increased rates of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19, but variations in study methodologies, patient populations, and anticoagulation strategies make it challenging to distill implications for clinical practice. Here, we present a practical review of current literature and uses a case-based format to discuss the diagnostic approach and management of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated coagulopathy is characterized by elevated D-dimer levels, hyperfibrinogenemia, and increased rates of thromboembolism. Current management guidelines are based on limited evidence from retrospective studies that should be interpreted carefully. At this time, all hospitalized patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 should receive coagulation test surveillance and standard doses of prophylactic anticoagulation until prospective randomized controlled trials yield definitive information in support of higher prophylactic doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan C. Chen
- Department of Hematology, Brigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Rebecca L. Zon
- Department of Hematology, Brigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | | - Jean M. Connors
- Department of Hematology, Brigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Frazer JS, Tyrynis Everden AJ. Emerging patterns of hypercoagulability associated with critical COVID-19: A review. TRENDS IN ANAESTHESIA AND CRITICAL CARE 2020; 34:4-13. [PMID: 38620391 PMCID: PMC7346831 DOI: 10.1016/j.tacc.2020.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
While the COVID-19 pandemic sweeps the world, much evidence is being gathered regarding its novel pathological mechanisms. It is the authors' clinical experience that patients in the intensive care unit suffering from COVID-19 are extremely pro-coagulable, with venous and arterial thromboembolism frequently observed, and losses of vascular access lines and filtration circuits to thrombosis now commonplace. Here, we explore the evidence for hypercoagulability in this group, presenting evidence of both a localised pulmonary hypercoagulability, and a systemic hypercoagulability resulting in thrombosis distant to the pulmonary vasculature. Furthermore, we discuss the possible risk factors exacerbated by, or selected for in COVID-19. We review the available evidence for use of plasma D-dimer as a prognostic marker, exploring the possibility that it acts as a marker of a COVID-19-associated hypercoagulability. We review the evidence for a pro-coagulant subtype of disseminated intravascular coagulation, discussing its clinical significance. Finally, we discuss the current evidence surrounding treatment of COVID-19 hypercoagulability, including prophylactic and treatment-dose heparin, thrombolytic agents, antiplatelet agents, and direct thrombin inhibitors, among others. We suggest areas in which further investigation is urgently needed to reduce the startling incidence of thrombosis in this group, a complication no doubt contributing to morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Scott Frazer
- Somerville College, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6HD, UK
- Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Nopp S, Moik F, Jilma B, Pabinger I, Ay C. Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2020; 4:1178-1191. [PMID: 33043231 PMCID: PMC7537137 DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 342] [Impact Index Per Article: 68.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Revised: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is frequently observed in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, reported VTE rates differ substantially. Objectives We aimed at evaluating available data and estimating the prevalence of VTE in patients with COVID-19. Methods We conducted a systematic literature search (MEDLINE, EMBASE, World Health Organization COVID-19 database) to identify studies reporting VTE rates in patients with COVID-19. Studies with suspected high risk of bias were excluded from quantitative synthesis. Pooled outcome rates were obtained within a random effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed for different settings (intensive care unit [ICU] vs non-ICU hospitalization and screening vs no screening) and the association of d-dimer levels and VTE risk was explored. Results Eighty-six studies (33,970 patients) were identified and 66 (28,173 patients, mean age: 62.6 years, 60.1% men, 19.4% ICU patients) were included in quantitative analysis. The overall VTE prevalence estimate was 14.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.6-16.9), 40.3% (95% CI, 27.0-54.3) with ultrasound screening and 9.5% (95% CI, 7.5-11.7) without screening. Subgroup analysis revealed high heterogeneity, with a VTE prevalence of 7.9% (95% CI, 5.1-11.2) in non-ICU and 22.7% (95% CI, 18.1-27.6) in ICU patients. Prevalence of pulmonary embolism (PE) in non-ICU and ICU patients was 3.5% (95% CI, 2.2-5.1) and 13.7% (95% CI, 10.0-17.9). Patients developing VTE had higher d-dimer levels (weighted mean difference, 3.26 µg/mL; 95% CI, 2.76-3.77) than non-VTE patients. Conclusion VTE occurs in 22.7% of patients with COVID-19 in the ICU, but VTE risk is also increased in non-ICU hospitalized patients. Patients developing VTE had higher d-dimer levels. Studies evaluating thromboprophylaxis strategies in patients with COVID-19 are needed to improve prevention of VTE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Nopp
- Clinical Division of Haematology and HaemostaseologyDepartment of Medicine IMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Florian Moik
- Clinical Division of Haematology and HaemostaseologyDepartment of Medicine IMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Bernd Jilma
- Department of Clinical PharmacologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Ingrid Pabinger
- Clinical Division of Haematology and HaemostaseologyDepartment of Medicine IMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Cihan Ay
- Clinical Division of Haematology and HaemostaseologyDepartment of Medicine IMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)MoscowRussia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Szegedi I, Orbán-Kálmándi R, Csiba L, Bagoly Z. Stroke as a Potential Complication of COVID-19-Associated Coagulopathy: A Narrative and Systematic Review of the Literature. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9103137. [PMID: 32998398 PMCID: PMC7599722 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9103137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Revised: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the most overwhelming medical threat of the past few decades. The infection, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), can cause serious illness leading to respiratory insufficiency, and, in severely ill patients, it can progress to multiple organ failure leading to death. It has been noted from the earliest reports that the disease influences the hemostasis system and a hallmark of severe infection is elevated D-dimer levels. The profound coagulation changes in COVID-19 seem to be linked to inflammation-related events and severe endothelial cell injury. Besides the high incidence of venous thromboembolic events in SARS-CoV-2 infections, arterial events, including cerebrovascular events, were found to be associated with the disease. In this review, we aimed to summarize the available literature on COVID-19-associated coagulopathy and thrombosis. Furthermore, we performed a systematic search of the literature to identify the characteristics of stroke in COVID-19. Our findings showed that acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is the most frequent type of stroke occurring in infected patients. In most cases, stroke was severe (median NIHSS:16) and most of the patients had one or more vascular risk factors. Laboratory findings in AIS patients were consistent with COVID-19-associated coagulopathy, and elevated D-dimer levels were the most common finding. The outcome was unfavorable in most cases, as a large proportion of the reported patients died or remained bedridden. Limited data are available as yet on outcomes after acute vascular interventions in COVID-19 patients. In the future, well-designed studies are needed to better understand the risk of stroke in COVID-19, to optimize treatment, and to improve stroke care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- István Szegedi
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Doctoral School of Neuroscience, University of Debrecen, 22 Móricz Zsigmond krt., 4032 Debrecen, Hungary; (I.S.); (L.C.)
| | - Rita Orbán-Kálmándi
- Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 98 Nagyerdei krt., 4032 Debrecen, Hungary;
| | - László Csiba
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Doctoral School of Neuroscience, University of Debrecen, 22 Móricz Zsigmond krt., 4032 Debrecen, Hungary; (I.S.); (L.C.)
- MTA-DE Cerebrovascular and Neurodegenerative Research Group, 22 Móricz Zsigmond krt., 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Zsuzsa Bagoly
- Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 98 Nagyerdei krt., 4032 Debrecen, Hungary;
- MTA-DE Cerebrovascular and Neurodegenerative Research Group, 22 Móricz Zsigmond krt., 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Hardy M, Lecompte T, Douxfils J, Lessire S, Dogné JM, Chatelain B, Testa S, Gouin-Thibault I, Gruel Y, Medcalf RL, ten Cate H, Lippi G, Mullier F. Management of the thrombotic risk associated with COVID-19: guidance for the hemostasis laboratory. Thromb J 2020; 18:17. [PMID: 32922211 PMCID: PMC7474970 DOI: 10.1186/s12959-020-00230-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with extreme inflammatory response, disordered hemostasis and high thrombotic risk. A high incidence of thromboembolic events has been reported despite thromboprophylaxis, raising the question of a more effective anticoagulation. First-line hemostasis tests such as activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, fibrinogen and D-dimers are proposed for assessing thrombotic risk and monitoring hemostasis, but are vulnerable to many drawbacks affecting their reliability and clinical relevance. Specialized hemostasis-related tests (soluble fibrin complexes, tests assessing fibrinolytic capacity, viscoelastic tests, thrombin generation) may have an interest to assess the thrombotic risk associated with COVID-19. Another challenge for the hemostasis laboratory is the monitoring of heparin treatment, especially unfractionated heparin in the setting of an extreme inflammatory response. This review aimed at evaluating the role of hemostasis tests in the management of COVID-19 and discussing their main limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Hardy
- Université catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center (NTHC), Hematology Laboratory, Yvoir, Belgium
- Université catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center (NTHC), Anesthesiology Department, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - T. Lecompte
- Département de Médecine, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, service d’angiologie et d’hémostase et Faculté de Médecine Geneva Platelet Group (GpG), Université de Genève, Geneva, Suisse Switzerland
| | - J. Douxfils
- Pharmacy Department, University of Namur, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center (NTHC), Namur, Belgium
- Qualiblood s.a, Namur, Belgium
| | - S. Lessire
- Université catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center (NTHC), Anesthesiology Department, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - J. M. Dogné
- Pharmacy Department, University of Namur, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center (NTHC), Namur, Belgium
| | - B. Chatelain
- Université catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center (NTHC), Hematology Laboratory, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - S. Testa
- Haemostasis and Thrombosis Center, Cremona Hospital, Cremona, Italy
| | - I. Gouin-Thibault
- Département d’Hématologie Biologique, INSERM, CIC 1414 (Centre d’Investigation Clinique de Rennes), Université de Rennes, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Y. Gruel
- Laboratoire d’Hématologie-Hémostase, CHRU de Tours, Hôpital Trousseau, Tours, France
| | - R. L. Medcalf
- Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - H. ten Cate
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - G. Lippi
- Section of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - F. Mullier
- Université catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center (NTHC), Hematology Laboratory, Yvoir, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|