1
|
Lim C, Saliba F, Salloum C, Azoulay D. Revisiting the place of surgical portal decompression for adults with noncirrhotic portal hypertension due to chronic extrahepatic portal vein obstruction: a scoping review. HPB (Oxford) 2025; 27:434-444. [PMID: 39863431 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2024] [Revised: 11/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/07/2025] [Indexed: 01/27/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver cirrhosis accounts for more than 90 % of portal hypertension cases, and the other cases are due to noncirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH). Variceal bleeding is the most life-threatening complication of portal hypertension and its primary treatment is medical according to the Baveno VII guidelines. This review discusses the evidence on surgical portal decompression for adult patients with NCPH secondary to chronic extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO). METHODS This is a scoping review of the evidence for the feasibility and effectiveness of surgical portal decompression in adults with NCPH secondary to EHPVO. RESULTS This scoping review yielded 17 studies, including a total of 110 patients. Patient age(s) ranged from 19 to 68 years, with the majority undergoing nonphysiological (i.e., portosystemic shunts) shunts (N = 84, 76.4 %), mostly for variceal bleeding refractory to medical and endoscopic treatments. Physiological shunts (i.e., Rex shunts) had a potential advantage over nonphysiological shunts in postoperative rebleeding (5 % vs. 10 %) and hepatic encephalopathy rates (0 % vs. 13 %). Conversely, nonphysiological shunts had a potential advantage over physiological shunts in postoperative shunt thrombosis (8 % vs. 22 %). DISCUSSION This scoping review reported that surgical portal decompression is feasible in adults with NCPH due to EHPVO with favorable outcomes and long-term patency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chetana Lim
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Research Unit, Université de Picardie-Jules Verne, UR UPJV 7518 SSPC, Amiens, France
| | - Faouzi Saliba
- Hepato-Biliary Center, AP-HP Paul Brousse Hospital, Paris-Saclay University, INSERM Unit 1193, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - Chady Salloum
- Hepato-Biliary Center, AP-HP Paul Brousse Hospital, Paris-Saclay University, INSERM Unit 1193, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - Daniel Azoulay
- Hepato-Biliary Center, AP-HP Paul Brousse Hospital, Paris-Saclay University, INSERM Unit 1193, 94800 Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rajendran V, Joy D, Sudheer Mohammed, Chandran B, Jacob M. Management of Preoperative Recipient Portal Vein Thrombosis in Living-donor Liver Transplantation. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2025; 15:102445. [PMID: 39802411 PMCID: PMC11714416 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2024.102445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2024] [Accepted: 10/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) occurs as a part of the natural history of cirrhosis in up to 15% of patients with cirrhosis. In the initial days, PVT was considered a contraindication to liver transplantation, but now with advanced techniques and perioperative management, patients with complex PVT also undergo living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) with a similar outcome. This review provides a comprehensive overview of methods to proceed with liver transplantation when the recipient has PVT. Preoperatively, anticoagulation remains the mainstay of treatment, with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) playing an adjunct role in preparing patients for liver transplantation. In all patients, thrombectomy with re-establishment of physiological portal flow is the initial step. In patients where flow cannot be established, other physiological or nonphysiological means are employed, especially in complex PVT. Patients with grade III/IV PVT have worse outcomes (graft failure, mortality, recurrence) than those with lower-grade PVT. Physiological reconstruction is the method of choice, whereas non-physiological means are used as a bailout procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Rajendran
- Aster Integrated Liver Care, Aster Medcity, Cheranallur, Kochi 682027, India
| | - Danny Joy
- Aster Integrated Liver Care, Aster Medcity, Cheranallur, Kochi 682027, India
| | - Sudheer Mohammed
- Aster Integrated Liver Care, Aster Medcity, Cheranallur, Kochi 682027, India
| | - Biju Chandran
- Aster Integrated Liver Care, Aster Medcity, Cheranallur, Kochi 682027, India
| | - Mathew Jacob
- Aster Integrated Liver Care, Aster Medcity, Cheranallur, Kochi 682027, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tang R, Tong X, Tang B, Hou Y, Wu G, Li A, Aini A, Zhang Y, Hao H, Lin J, Song J, Xu G, Yan J, Lu Q. A Novel Preoperative Classification System for Selecting Suitable Surgeries in Liver Transplant Patients with Portal Vein Cavernous Transformation. J INVEST SURG 2024; 37:2427391. [PMID: 39532291 DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2024.2427391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 11/01/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the new preoperative Changgung classification (CC) system of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in choosing suitable operative procedures to reconstruct portal veins during liver transplantation (LT) in patients with portal vein cavernous transformation (PVCT). METHODS This retrospective observational study analyzed data from allograft LTs performed for various liver diseases. RESULTS The study included 22 males and 4 females with LT indications comprising cirrhosis (n = 9), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 12), PVCT (n = 2), liver failure from fulminant hepatitis B (n = 1), dysfunction of transplanted liver (n = 1), and chronic rejection of transplanted liver (n = 1). Patients were classified according to Yerdel (21 Yerdel II and 5 Yerdel III) and CC (C1-C5). In total 16 simple operations were performed on C1-C3 cases and 9 complex operations on C4-C5 cases, with one additional simple operation. The distribution according to the Yerdel classification was 16 simple and 5 complex operations in Yerdel II cases and 1 simple and 4 complex operations in Yerdel III cases. The median follow-up time was 27.5 months with overall one-year and three-year OS rates of 88.1% and 83.9% for the cohort. Specifically, the one-year OS rates for patients classified as C1-3 vs. C4-5 were 93.3% and 80.0%, while the three-year OS rates were 86.7% and 80.0%, respectively (p = 0.526). CONCLUSION The CC proposed in this study shows comparable potential to the Yerdel classification in preoperatively identifying the need for complex surgical techniques in LT patients with PVCT and may also have predictive power for the survival benefits following LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Tang
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Xuan Tong
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Bingjun Tang
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Yucheng Hou
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Guangdong Wu
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Ang Li
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Abudusalamu Aini
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuewei Zhang
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Huayuan Hao
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Jingyi Lin
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Jiyong Song
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Guangxun Xu
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Yan
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Qian Lu
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang PL, Ramalingam V, Yang LM. Portal Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Cirrhosis. CURRENT HEPATOLOGY REPORTS 2024; 23:64-72. [DOI: 10.1007/s11901-024-00636-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
|
5
|
Aiza-Haddad I, Cisneros-Garza LE, Morales-Gutiérrez O, Malé-Velázquez R, Rizo-Robles MT, Alvarado-Reyes R, Barrientos-Quintanilla LA, Betancourt-Sánchez F, Cerda-Reyes E, Contreras-Omaña R, Dehesa-Violante MB, Flores-García NC, Gómez-Almaguer D, Higuera-de la Tijera MF, Lira-Pedrin MA, Lira-Vera JE, Manzano-Cortés H, Meléndez-Mena DE, Muñoz-Ramírez MR, Pérez-Hernández JL, Ramos-Gómez MV, Sánchez-Ávila JF. Guidelines for the management of coagulation disorders in patients with cirrhosis. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA DE MEXICO (ENGLISH) 2024; 89:144-162. [PMID: 38600006 DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2023.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
Coagulation management in the patient with cirrhosis has undergone a significant transformation since the beginning of this century, with the concept of a rebalancing between procoagulant and anticoagulant factors. The paradigm that patients with cirrhosis have a greater bleeding tendency has changed, as a result of this rebalancing. In addition, it has brought to light the presence of complications related to thrombotic events in this group of patients. These guidelines detail aspects related to pathophysiologic mechanisms that intervene in the maintenance of hemostasis in the patient with cirrhosis, the relevance of portal hypertension, mechanical factors for the development of bleeding, modifications in the hepatic synthesis of coagulation factors, and the changes in the reticuloendothelial system in acute hepatic decompensation and acute-on-chronic liver failure. They address new aspects related to the hemorrhagic complications in patients with cirrhosis, considering the risk for bleeding during diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, as well as the usefulness of different tools for diagnosing coagulation and recommendations on the pharmacologic treatment and blood-product transfusion in the context of hemorrhage. These guidelines also update the knowledge regarding hypercoagulability in the patient with cirrhosis, as well as the efficacy and safety of treatment with the different anticoagulation regimens. Lastly, they provide recommendations on coagulation management in the context of acute-on-chronic liver failure, acute liver decompensation, and specific aspects related to the patient undergoing liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Aiza-Haddad
- Clínica de Enfermedades Hepáticas, Hospital Ángeles Lomas, Mexico City, Mexico.
| | - L E Cisneros-Garza
- Departamento de Gastroenterología y Hepatología, Hospital Christus Muguerza Alta Especialidad, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - O Morales-Gutiérrez
- Departamento de Gastroenterología y Hepatología, Hospital General de México «Dr. Eduardo Liceaga», Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - M T Rizo-Robles
- Departamento de Gastroenterología y Hepatología, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Centro Médico Nacional «La Raza», Mexico City, Mexico
| | - R Alvarado-Reyes
- Departamento de Hepatología, Hospital San José Tec Salud, Monterrey, Mexico
| | | | | | - E Cerda-Reyes
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Central Militar, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - R Contreras-Omaña
- Centro de Investigación en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Gastroenterología (CIEHG) Pachuca, Hidalgo, México
| | | | - N C Flores-García
- Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud. Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey Nuevo Leon, México
| | | | - M F Higuera-de la Tijera
- Departamento de Gastroenterología y Hepatología, Hospital General de México «Dr. Eduardo Liceaga», Mexico City, Mexico
| | - M A Lira-Pedrin
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Endoscopía Digestiva, Motilidad y Hepatología, Centro Médico Corporativo Galeana, Tijuana, México
| | - J E Lira-Vera
- Departamento de Gastroenterología y Hepatología, Hospital General de México «Dr. Eduardo Liceaga», Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - D E Meléndez-Mena
- Hospital General de Especialidades «Maximino Ávila Camacho», IMSS, UMAE, Puebla, México
| | - M R Muñoz-Ramírez
- Departamento de Hepatología, Hospital San José Tec Salud, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - J L Pérez-Hernández
- Departamento de Gastroenterología y Hepatología, Hospital General de México «Dr. Eduardo Liceaga», Mexico City, Mexico
| | - M V Ramos-Gómez
- Departamento Hepatología, ISSSTE, Centro Médico Nacional «20 de noviembre», Ciudad de México, México
| | - J F Sánchez-Ávila
- Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud. Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey Nuevo Leon, México
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Attanasi ML, Bou Daher H, Rockey DC. Natural History and Outcomes of Cavernous Transformation of the Portal Vein in Cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68:3458-3466. [PMID: 37349605 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-07993-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Cavernous transformation of the portal vein can occur after portal vein thrombosis (PVT). In this study, we investigated clinical complications associated with cavernous transformation in the context of cirrhosis and PVT. METHODS In this retrospective cohort analysis, 204 patients with cirrhosis and PVT with or without cavernous transformation were identified using MUSC's Clinical Data Warehouse between January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2019. Complete demographic data, clinical history, and laboratory tests were abstracted from the electronic medical record. RESULTS Of 204 patients, 41 (20%) had cavernous transformation. MELD, Child-Pugh, and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were similar among groups. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of esophageal varices (with or without bleeding), splenomegaly, or hepatic encephalopathy in patients with and without cavernous transformation, although ascites tended to be lower in patients with cavernous transformation (31/41 (76%) vs 142/163 (87%), p = 0.06). Patients with cavernous transformation were significantly less likely to have hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (13/41 (32%) vs 81/163 (50%), p < 0.05) and had significantly lower APRI (1.4 vs 2.0, p < 0.05) and Fib-4 (4.7 vs 6.5, p < 0.05). Patients with cavernous transformation had lower 5-year mortality (12/41 (29%) vs 81/163 (49%) died, p = 0.06). The 10-year mortality of patients with cavernous transformation without HCC was significantly lower than in those without cavernous transformation (8/28 (29%) vs 46/82 (56%), respectively, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Patients with cavernous transformation appeared to have better outcomes than those without cavernous transformation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael L Attanasi
- Digestive Disease Research Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Clinical Sciences Building, Suite 908, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Halim Bou Daher
- Digestive Disease Research Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Clinical Sciences Building, Suite 908, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Don C Rockey
- Digestive Disease Research Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Clinical Sciences Building, Suite 908, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ramalingam V, Yang LM, McCarthy CJ, Ahmed M. Interventional Approach to Portal Vein Thrombosis and Liver Transplantation: State of the Art. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:1262. [PMID: 37374045 DOI: 10.3390/life13061262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Porto-mesenteric vein thrombosis (PVT) is a well-recognized but uncommon disease entity in patients with and without cirrhosis. Given the complexity of these patients, there are many differing treatment algorithms depending on the individual circumstances of a given patient. The focus of this review is primarily patients with cirrhosis, with an emphasis on liver transplantation considerations. The presence of cirrhosis substantially affects work-up, prognosis, and management of these patients and will substantially affect the patient treatment and have additional implications for prognosis and long-term outcomes. Here, we review the incidence of portal vein thrombosis in known cirrhotic patients, medical and interventional treatment options that are currently used, and, in particular, how to approach cirrhotic patients with PVT who are awaiting liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay Ramalingam
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Lauren M Yang
- Division of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Colin J McCarthy
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Muneeb Ahmed
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fundora Y, Hessheimer AJ, Del Prete L, Maroni L, Lanari J, Barrios O, Clarysse M, Gastaca M, Barrera Gómez M, Bonadona A, Janek J, Boscà A, Álamo Martínez JM, Zozaya G, López Garnica D, Magistri P, León F, Magini G, Patrono D, Ničovský J, Hakeem AR, Nadalin S, McCormack L, Palacios P, Zieniewicz K, Blanco G, Nuño J, Pérez Saborido B, Echeverri J, Bynon JS, Martins PN, López López V, Dayangac M, Lodge JPA, Romagnoli R, Toso C, Santoyo J, Di Benedetto F, Gómez-Gavara C, Rotellar F, Gómez-Bravo MÁ, López Andújar R, Girard E, Valdivieso A, Pirenne J, Lladó L, Germani G, Cescon M, Hashimoto K, Quintini C, Cillo U, Polak WG, Fondevila C. Alternative forms of portal vein revascularization in liver transplant recipients with complex portal vein thrombosis. J Hepatol 2023; 78:794-804. [PMID: 36690281 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Complex portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a challenge in liver transplantation (LT). Extra-anatomical approaches to portal revascularization, including renoportal (RPA), left gastric vein (LGA), pericholedochal vein (PCA), and cavoportal (CPA) anastomoses, have been described in case reports and series. The RP4LT Collaborative was created to record cases of alternative portal revascularization performed for complex PVT. METHODS An international, observational web registry was launched in 2020. Cases of complex PVT undergoing first LT performed with RPA, LGA, PCA, or CPA were recorded and updated through 12/2021. RESULTS A total of 140 cases were available for analysis: 74 RPA, 18 LGA, 20 PCA, and 28 CPA. Transplants were primarily performed with whole livers (98%) in recipients with median (IQR) age 58 (49-63) years, model for end-stage liver disease score 17 (14-24), and cold ischemia 431 (360-505) minutes. Post-operatively, 49% of recipients developed acute kidney injury, 16% diuretic-responsive ascites, 9% refractory ascites (29% with CPA, p <0.001), and 10% variceal hemorrhage (25% with CPA, p = 0.002). After a median follow-up of 22 (4-67) months, patient and graft 1-/3-/5-year survival rates were 71/67/61% and 69/63/57%, respectively. On multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, the only factor significantly and independently associated with all-cause graft loss was non-physiological portal vein reconstruction in which all graft portal inflow arose from recipient systemic circulation (hazard ratio 6.639, 95% CI 2.159-20.422, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Alternative forms of portal vein anastomosis achieving physiological portal inflow (i.e., at least some recipient splanchnic blood flow reaching transplant graft) offer acceptable post-transplant results in LT candidates with complex PVT. On the contrary, non-physiological portal vein anastomoses fail to resolve portal hypertension and should not be performed. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS Complex portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a challenge in liver transplantation. Results of this international, multicenter analysis may be used to guide clinical decisions in transplant candidates with complex PVT. Extra-anatomical portal vein anastomoses that allow for at least some recipient splanchnic blood flow to the transplant allograft offer acceptable results. On the other hand, anastomoses that deliver only systemic blood flow to the allograft fail to resolve portal hypertension and should not be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiliam Fundora
- General & Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Amelia J Hessheimer
- General & Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; General & Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain; CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luca Del Prete
- Transplantation Center, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Lorenzo Maroni
- Hepatobiliary Surgery & Transplant Unit, Policlinico Sant'Orsola IRCCS, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Jacopo Lanari
- Department of Surgery, Oncology, & Gastroenterology, Hepatobiliary & Liver Transplantation Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Oriana Barrios
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Mikel Gastaca
- Hepatobiliary Surgery & Liver Transplantation Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Hospital Universitario Cruces, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Manuel Barrera Gómez
- Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Agnès Bonadona
- Grenoble Alpes University, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Digestive Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Grenoble, France
| | - Julius Janek
- Department of Transplant Surgery, F.D. Roosevelt Hospital, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
| | - Andrea Boscà
- Liver Transplantation & Hepatology Laboratory, Hepatology, HPB Surgery & Transplant Unit, Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe, La Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Gabriel Zozaya
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra; Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery & Liver Transplantation Unit, Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Francisco León
- Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Giulia Magini
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Damiano Patrono
- General Surgery 2U - Liver Transplant Centre, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Jiří Ničovský
- Centrum Kardiovaskulární a Transplantační Chirurgie, Brno, Czechia
| | - Abdul Rahman Hakeem
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association (ELITA) Board
| | | | - Pilar Palacios
- Hospital Clínico Universitario de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Krzysztof Zieniewicz
- Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland; European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association (ELITA) Board
| | - Gerardo Blanco
- Hospital Universitario de Badajoz, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
| | - Javier Nuño
- Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Baltasar Pérez Saborido
- Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery & Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Juan Echeverri
- Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - J Steve Bynon
- University of Texas Houston - Memorial Hermann TMC, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Paulo N Martins
- University of Massachusetts - Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Víctor López López
- Department of Surgery & Transplantation, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcian Institue of Biosanitary Research (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
| | - Murat Dayangac
- Medipol University Hospital Center for Organ Transplantation, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - J Peter A Lodge
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Renato Romagnoli
- General Surgery 2U - Liver Transplant Centre, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Christian Toso
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland; European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association (ELITA) Board
| | - Julio Santoyo
- Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery & Liver Transplantation Unit, Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra; Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Rafael López Andújar
- CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Liver Transplantation & Hepatology Laboratory, Hepatology, HPB Surgery & Transplant Unit, Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe, La Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Edouard Girard
- Grenoble Alpes University, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Digestive Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Grenoble, France
| | - Andrés Valdivieso
- Hepatobiliary Surgery & Liver Transplantation Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Hospital Universitario Cruces, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Jacques Pirenne
- Abdominal Transplant Surgery, UZ Leuven, KUL, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Laura Lladó
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Giacomo Germani
- Department of Surgery, Oncology, & Gastroenterology, Hepatobiliary & Liver Transplantation Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy; European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association (ELITA) Board
| | - Matteo Cescon
- Hepatobiliary Surgery & Transplant Unit, Policlinico Sant'Orsola IRCCS, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Koji Hashimoto
- Transplantation Center, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Cristiano Quintini
- Transplantation Center, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Department of Surgery, Oncology, & Gastroenterology, Hepatobiliary & Liver Transplantation Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Wojciech G Polak
- Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association (ELITA) Board
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- General & Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; General & Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain; CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association (ELITA) Board.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pinelli D, Cescon M, Ravaioli M, Neri F, Amaduzzi A, Serenari M, Carioli G, Siniscalchi A, Colledan M. Liver Transplantation in Patients with Portal Vein Thrombosis: Revisiting Outcomes According to Surgical Techniques. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12072457. [PMID: 37048541 PMCID: PMC10095520 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12072457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgical strategies for graft portal vein flow restoration vary from termino-terminal portal vein anastomosis to more complex bypass reconstructions. Although the surgical strategy strongly influences the post-operative outcome, the Yerdel grading is still commonly used to determine the prognosis of patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) undergoing liver transplantation (LT). We retrospectively reviewed the cases of LT performed on recipients with complex PVT at two high-volume transplantation centres. We stratified the patients by the type of portal vein reconstruction, termino-terminal portal vein anastomosis (TTA) versus bypass reconstruction (bypass group), and assessed a multivariable survival analysis. The rate of mortality at 90 days was 21.4% for the bypass group compared to 9.8% in the TTA group (p = 0.05). In the multivariable correlation analysis, only a trend for greater risk of early mortality was confirmed in the bypass groups (HR 2.5; p = 0.059). Yerdel grade was uninfluential in the rate of early complications. A wide range of surgical options are available for different situations of PVT which yield an outcome unrelated to the Yerdel grading. An algorithm for PVT management should be based on the technical approach and should include a surgically oriented definition of PVT extension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Pinelli
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Matteo Cescon
- Hepatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Policlinico Sant'Orsola IRCCS, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Ravaioli
- Hepatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Policlinico Sant'Orsola IRCCS, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Flavia Neri
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Annalisa Amaduzzi
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Matteo Serenari
- Hepatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Policlinico Sant'Orsola IRCCS, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Greta Carioli
- FROM Research Foundation, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Antonio Siniscalchi
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Policlinico Sant'Orsola IRCCS, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Michele Colledan
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Marra P, Dulcetta L, Carbone FS, Muglia R, Muscogiuri G, Cheli M, D’Antiga L, Colledan M, Fagiuoli S, Sironi S. The Role of Imaging in Portal Vein Thrombosis: From the Diagnosis to the Interventional Radiological Management. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:2628. [PMID: 36359472 PMCID: PMC9689990 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12112628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 08/30/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To illustrate diagnostic and interventional imaging for the characterization and treatment of portal vein thrombosis (PVT). INTRODUCTION The broad spectrum of congenital and acquired PVT manifestations is illustrated, with a focus on the pediatric population; diagnostic and interventional imaging techniques are described. DESCRIPTION PVT frequently presents as an incidental finding at imaging in the screening for liver diseases or for other unrelated reasons. PVT can be classified based on: extension (intrahepatic, extrahepatic, involving the spleno-mesenteric tract, etc.); degree (partial or complete); onset (acute or chronic); and with or without cavernomatous transformation. This comprehensive review relies on the experience gained from a large series of congenital and acquired PVT in a referral center for pediatric and adult liver transplantation. Diagnostic and interventional imaging techniques are described, including: color-Doppler and contrast-enhanced Ultrasound; CT and MR angiography; retrograde portography; percutaneous transhepatic, transplenic, and transmesenteric portography; transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation. Pre- and post-operative imaging assessment of the surgical meso-rex bypass is discussed. The description is enriched with an original series of pictorial imaging findings. CONCLUSION PVT is a clinical condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Diagnostic and interventional imaging plays a crucial role in both conservative and operative management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Marra
- Department of Radiology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
| | - Ludovico Dulcetta
- Department of Radiology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Saverio Carbone
- Department of Radiology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Muglia
- Department of Radiology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Muscogiuri
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, San Luca Hospital, 20149 Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Cheli
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Lorenzo D’Antiga
- Department of Pediatric Hepatology, Gastroenterology and Transplantation, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Michele Colledan
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Stefano Fagiuoli
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantation Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Sandro Sironi
- Department of Radiology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gravetz A. Portal vein-variceal anastomosis for portal vein inflow reconstruction in orthotopic liver transplantation: A case report and review of literature. World J Transplant 2022; 12:204-210. [PMID: 36051454 PMCID: PMC9331412 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v12.i7.204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a frequent complication occurring in 5% to 26% of cirrhotic patients candidates for liver transplantation (LT). In cases of extensive portal and or mesenteric vein thrombosis, complex vascular reconstruction of the portal inflow may become necessary for a successful orthotopic LT (OLT).
CASE SUMMARY A 54-year-old male with history of cirrhosis secondary to schistosomiasis complicated with extensive portal and mesenteric vein thrombosis and severe portal hypertension who underwent OLT with portal vein-left gastric vein anastomosis.
CONCLUSION We review the various types of PVT, the portal venous inflow reconstruction techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aviad Gravetz
- Department of Transplantation, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach-Tikva 4941492, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pinelli D, Neri F, Tornese S, Amaduzzi A, Camagni S, D'Antiga L, Fagiuoli S, Colledan M. Physiological reno-portal bypass in liver transplantation with non-tumorous portal vein thrombosis. Updates Surg 2022; 74:1617-1626. [PMID: 35441945 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01280-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Reno-portal anastomosis (RPA) in presence of spleno-renal shunts (SRS) is a physiological option to restore blood flow in liver transplantation with portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Diffuse splanchnic venous system thrombosis (complex PVT) is its main indication but RPA proved to be useful in selected cases of less extensive thrombosis (non-complex PVT). Up until now only two monocentric and one multicentric case series has been published on this topic in addition to few anecdotal reports. After 2014, we introduced RPA in our institution to manage some cases of complex PVT in presence of SRS. Here, we present the evolution of indication to RPA. From 2014 to 2020, we performed ten RPA: nine patients presented non-complex and one complex PVT. Overall early and late complication rates were 66.6% and 50%, respectively. Two patients developed RPA stenosis, treated by interventional radiology. Self-resolving acute kidney injury (AKI) was observed in three cases. No re-transplantation was necessary. RPA was patent in all patients, with a mean follow-up of 41.9 months. The overall patient survival was 70% at 1 year and 60% at 3 and 5 years. Four patients died at 1, 2, 3 and 20 months from LT. Causes of deaths were, respectively, stroke, cerebral infection, sepsis (MOF) and sudden variceal bleeding in sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. The relative simplicity and effectiveness of RPA in presence of SRS allowed us to rely more and more often on this technique in liver transplantation with challenging non-complex PVT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Pinelli
- General Surgery, Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Piazza OMS 1, 24127, Bergamo, Italy.
| | - Flavia Neri
- General Surgery, Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Piazza OMS 1, 24127, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Stefania Tornese
- General Surgery, Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Piazza OMS 1, 24127, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Annalisa Amaduzzi
- General Surgery, Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Piazza OMS 1, 24127, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Stefania Camagni
- General Surgery, Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Piazza OMS 1, 24127, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Lorenzo D'Antiga
- Paediatric Hepatology, Gastroenterology and Transplantation, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Piazza OMS 1, 24127, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Stefano Fagiuoli
- Gastroenterology Hepatology and Transplantation, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Piazza OMS 1, 24127, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Michele Colledan
- General Surgery, Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Piazza OMS 1, 24127, Bergamo, Italy
- Università di Milano - Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126, Milano, MI, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hanafy AS, Tharwat EE. Differentiation of malignant from non-malignant portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis: the challenging dilemma. EGYPTIAN LIVER JOURNAL 2021. [DOI: 10.1186/s43066-021-00158-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
PVT is an ultrasonographic finding in up to 8% of patients with liver cirrhosis. Once hepatocellular carcinoma has occurred as the final station in liver cirrhosis, the risk of PVT rises to 40%. Benign and malignant PVT can occur in patients with liver cirrhosis, and it is important to differentiate the nature of PVT as it has a great impact on patient’s management and outcome.
Diagnosis
Confirming portal vein thrombosis and extension by abdominal ultrasound, contrast-enhanced USG, CT, or MRI. Malignant criteria of PVT are pulsatile pattern in Doppler and heterogeneous contrast enhancement, which are especially seen at the arterial phase, neovascularity within PVT, portal vein thrombus with a diameter of > 23 mm while in benign thrombus, PV diameter does not exceed 20 mm. Visible hypervascular tumor is in close proximity to PVT.
Conclusion
It is not uncommon to find portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis, despite the fact that malignant variant is the most frequent, but efforts should be gathered to exclude benign PVT which may change the management of the patients dramatically.
Collapse
|
14
|
Pinelli D, Camagni S, Amaduzzi A, Frosio F, Fontanella L, Carioli G, Guizzetti M, Zambelli MF, Giovanelli M, Fagiuoli S, Colledan M. Liver transplantation in patients with non-neoplastic portal vein thrombosis: 20 years of experience in a single center. Clin Transplant 2021; 36:e14501. [PMID: 34633110 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Yerdel classification is widely used for describing the severity of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in liver transplant (LT) candidates, but might not accurately predict transplant outcome. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data regarding 97 adult patients with PVT who underwent LT, investigating whether the complexity of portal reconstruction could better correlate with transplant outcome than the site and extent of the thrombosis. RESULTS 79/97 (80%) patients underwent thrombectomy and anatomical anastomosis (TAA), 18/97 (20%) patients underwent non-anatomical physiological reconstructions (non-TAA). PVT Yerdel grade was 1-2 in 72/97 (74%) patients, and 3-4 in 25/97 (26%) patients. Univariate analysis revealed higher 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, 1-year mortality, and a higher rate of severe early complications in the non-TAA group than in the TAA group (p = .018, .001, .014, .009, respectively). In the model adjusted for PVT Yerdel grade, non-TAA remained independently associated with higher 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality (p = .021, .007, and .015, respectively). The portal vein re-thrombosis and overall patient and graft survival rates were similar. DISCUSSION In our experience, the complexity of portal reconstruction better correlated with transplant outcome than the Yerdel classification, which did not even appear to be a reliable predictor of the surgical complexity and technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Pinelli
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Stefania Camagni
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Annalisa Amaduzzi
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Fabio Frosio
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Laura Fontanella
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Greta Carioli
- FROM Research Foundation, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Michela Guizzetti
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - Mara Giovanelli
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Stefano Fagiuoli
- Gastroenterology Hepatology and Transplantation, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Michele Colledan
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Xu S, Guo X, Yang B, Romeiro FG, Primignani M, Méndez-Sánchez N, Yoshida EM, Mancuso A, Tacke F, Noronha Ferreira C, De Stefano V, Qi X. Evolution of Nonmalignant Portal Vein Thrombosis in Liver Cirrhosis: A Pictorial Review. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2021; 12:e00409. [PMID: 34597281 PMCID: PMC8483868 DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a common complication in liver cirrhosis, especially in advanced cirrhosis. It may be related to a higher risk of liver-related events and liver function deterioration. Imaging examinations can not only provide an accurate diagnosis of PVT, such as the extent of thrombus involvement and the degree of lumen occupied, but also identify the nature of thrombus (i.e., benign/malignant and acute/chronic). Evolution of PVT, mainly including development, recanalization, progression, stability, and recurrence, could also be assessed based on the imaging examinations. This article briefly reviews the pathophysiology, diagnosis, classification, and evolution of PVT with an emphasis on their computed tomography imaging features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shixue Xu
- Liver Cirrhosis Study Group, Department of Gastroenterology, The General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (formerly General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area), Shenyang, China
- Graduate School, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiaozhong Guo
- Liver Cirrhosis Study Group, Department of Gastroenterology, The General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (formerly General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area), Shenyang, China
| | - Benqiang Yang
- Department of Radiology, The General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
| | - Fernando Gomes Romeiro
- Department of Internal Medicine, Botucatu Medical School, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista. Av. Prof. Mário Rubens Guimarães Montenegro, s/n Distrito de Rubião Jr, Botucatu, Brazil
| | - Massimo Primignani
- Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Milan, Italy
| | - Nahum Méndez-Sánchez
- Liver Research Unit, Medica Sur Clinic and Foundation and Faculty of Medicine. National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Eric M. Yoshida
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Andrea Mancuso
- Medicina Interna 1, Azienda di Rilievo Nazionale ad Alta Specializzazione Civico, Di Cristina-Benfratelli, Palermo, Italy
| | - Frank Tacke
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carlos Noronha Ferreira
- Serviço de Gastrenterologia e Hepatologia, Hospital de Santa Maria-Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Valerio De Stefano
- Dipartimento Di Diagnostica Per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica Ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Xingshun Qi
- Liver Cirrhosis Study Group, Department of Gastroenterology, The General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (formerly General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area), Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yeoh SW, Kok HK. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in portal vein thrombosis: A review. J Dig Dis 2021; 22:506-519. [PMID: 34323378 DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.13035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The presence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) has previously been considered a contraindication to the insertion of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPSS). However, patients with PVT may have portal hypertension complications and may thus benefit from TIPSS to reduce portal venous pressure. There is an increasing body of literature that discusses the techniques and outcomes of TIPSS in PVT. This review summarizes the techniques, indications and outcomes of TIPSS in PVT in published case reports, case series and comparative trials, especially regarding the reduction in portal hypertensive complications such as variceal bleeding. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using MEDLINE and PubMed databases. Manuscripts published in English between 1 January 1990 and 1 March 2021 were used. Abstracts were screened and data from potentially relevant articles analyzed. TIPSS in PVT has been reported with high levels of technical success, short-term portal vein recanalization and long-term PV patency and TIPSS patency outcomes. Several comparative studies, including randomized controlled trials, have shown favorable outcomes of TIPSS compared with non-TIPSS treatment of PVT complications. Outcomes of TIPSS with PVT appear similar to those in TIPSS without PVT. However, TIPSS may be more technically difficult in the presence of PVT, and such procedures should be performed in expert high-volume centers to mitigate the risk of procedural complications. The presence of PVT should no longer be considered a contraindication to TIPSS. TIPSS for PVT has been acknowledged as a therapeutic strategy in recent international guidelines, although further studies are needed before recommendations can be strengthened. KEY POINTS: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is no longer a contraindication to the insertion of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPSS) TIPSS often leads to the spontaneous dissolution of PVT, but can be combined with mechanical or pharmacological thrombectomy TIPSS reduces portal hypertensive complications of PVT, such as variceal bleeding, and can also facilitate liver transplantation where PVT may otherwise interfere with vascular anastomoses Studies have shown favorable long-term outcomes of TIPSS compared with TIPSS without PVT; as well as compared with non-TIPSS treatment of PVT complications TIPSS in PVT should be performed in high-volume specialist centers due to technical difficulties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sern Wei Yeoh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,School of Medical Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hong Kuan Kok
- Department of Radiology, Northern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,School of Medicine, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Senzolo M, Garcia-Tsao G, García-Pagán JC. Current knowledge and management of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2021; 75:442-453. [PMID: 33930474 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is an increasingly recognised complication of cirrhosis whose incidence increases in parallel with the severity of cirrhosis. Several risk factors have been associated with the occurrence and progression of PVT. Although the negative effect of complete PVT on the surgical outcome of liver transplant recipients is clear, its impact on cirrhosis progression remains uncertain. Treatment options include anticoagulants and interventional thrombolytic therapies, which are chosen almost on a case-by-case basis depending on the characteristics of the patient and the thrombus. In this manuscript, we review current knowledge regarding the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis and classification, natural history, clinical consequences and treatment of non-neoplastic PVT in cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Senzolo
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit-Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy(†).
| | - Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao
- Section of Digestive Diseases, VA-Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA; Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Juan Carlos García-Pagán
- Barcelona Hepatic Hemodynamic Laboratory, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; Institut de Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Spain; CIBEREHD (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Spain(†)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ravaioli M, Prosperi E, Pinna A, Siniscalchi A, Fallani G, Frascaroli G, Maroni L, Odaldi F, Serenari M, Cescon M. Restoration of portal flow with varix in liver transplantation for patients with total portal vein thrombosis: An effective strategy in the largest center experience. Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14303. [PMID: 33797802 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Postoperative complications and worse prognosis still burden liver transplantations (LT) with complex portal vein thrombosis (CPVT). When an engorged left gastric vein (LGV) is present, the portal inflow is restorable with an anastomosis between the graft portal vein and the LGV of the recipient. We analyzed short- and long-term results of this procedure in 12 LT with CPVT. METHODS Between 2005 and 2019, 55 patients with CPVT underwent LT. We applied this technique in 12 patients. In six cases, we placed a vascular graft to obtain a tension-free structure. We evaluated patency, short- and long-term results. RESULTS No intraoperative complication was observed. The median duration of LT, blood transfusion, deceased donor age, and MELD score of the recipients were 7 h, 1250 mL, 72 years, and 19. Seven patients were affected by hepatocellular carcinoma. No major complications or PVT recurrence were observed. One patient required a liver re-transplantation for primary non-functioning syndrome. The mean hospital stay was 20 days. The actuarial patient survival was 85% with a mean FU of 4 years. The two late deaths were due to hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence and sepsis for cholangitis. CONCLUSIONS This technique in presence of both CPVT and engorged LGV is feasible and safe for patients, with good short- and long-term results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Ravaioli
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Enrico Prosperi
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonio Pinna
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonio Siniscalchi
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Guido Fallani
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giacomo Frascaroli
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Maroni
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Federica Odaldi
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Serenari
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Cescon
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rugivarodom M, Charatcharoenwitthaya P. Nontumoral Portal Vein Thrombosis: A Challenging Consequence of Liver Cirrhosis. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2020; 8:432-444. [PMID: 33447527 PMCID: PMC7782107 DOI: 10.14218/jcth.2020.00067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Revised: 09/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Nontumoral portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is an increasingly recognized complication in patients with cirrhosis. Substantial evidence shows that portal flow stasis, complex thrombophilic disorders, and exogenous factors leading to endothelial dysfunction have emerged as key factors in the pathogenesis of PVT. The contribution of PVT to hepatic decompensation and mortality in cirrhosis is debatable; however, the presence of an advanced PVT increases operative complexity and decreases survival after transplantation. The therapeutic decision for PVT is often determined by the duration and extent of thrombosis, the presence of symptoms, and liver transplant eligibility. Evidence from several cohorts has demonstrated that anticoagulation treatment with vitamin K antagonist or low molecular weight heparin can achieve recanalization of the portal vein, which is associated with a reduction in portal hypertension-related events and improved survival in cirrhotic patients with PVT. Consequently, interest in direct oral anticoagulants for PVT is increasing, but clinical data in cirrhosis are limited. Although the most feared consequence of anticoagulation is bleeding, most studies indicate that anticoagulation therapy for PVT in cirrhosis appears relatively safe. Interestingly, the data showed that transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt represents an effective adjunctive therapy for PVT in cirrhotic patients with symptomatic portal hypertension if anticoagulation is ineffective. Insufficient evidence regarding the optimal timing, modality, and duration of therapy makes nontumoral PVT a challenging consequence of cirrhosis. In this review, we summarize the current literature and provide a potential algorithm for the management of PVT in patients with cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manus Rugivarodom
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Correspondence to: Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Wang-Lang Road, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok 10700, Thailand. Tel: +662-419-7282, Fax: +662-411-5013, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tekin A, Beduschi T, Vianna R, Mangus RS. Multivisceral transplant as an option to transplant cirrhotic patients with severe portal vein thrombosis. Int J Surg 2020; 82S:115-121. [PMID: 32739540 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a critical complication in the patient with advanced cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation (LT). With the evolution of liver transplant (LT) technique, PVT has morphed from an absolute contraindication to a relative contraindication, depending on the grade of the thrombus. The Yerdel classification is one system of grading PVT severity. Patients with Yerdel class 1-3 PVT can undergo LT at centers with experience in complex portal vein (PV) dissection, thrombectomy, and reconstruction. Class 4 PVT, however, is even more complex and may require heroic techniques such as cavoportal hemitransposition, PV arterialization or multivisceral transplant (MVT). Some centers use a MVT back-up approach for patients with Yerdel class 4 PVT. In these patients, all organs with PV outflow are procured simultaneously as a cluster graft from a deceased donor (liver, pancreas, intestine±stomach). If physiologic PV inflow is established intraoperatively, the recipient undergoes LT. Otherwise the MVT graft is transplanted. MVT establishes physiologic PV flow, but transplantation of the intestine confers significant lifelong risks including rejection, graft-versus host disease and post-transplant lymphoma. Yerdel class 1-4 PVT patients undergoing successful LT have 5-year survival similar to non-PVT patients, while patients requiring full MVT experience somewhat higher mortality because of the complexity of the surgery and medical management.
Collapse
|
21
|
Rössle M, Bettinger D, Trebicka J, Klinger C, Praktiknjo M, Sturm L, Caca K, Mücke VT, Radecke K, Engelmann C, Zipprich A, Heinzow H, Meyer C, Tappe U, Appenrodt B, Schmidt A, Lange C, Strassburg C, Zeuzem S, Grandt D, Schmidt H, Moessner J, Berg T, Lammert F, Thimme R, Schultheiß M. A prospective, multicentre study in acute non-cirrhotic, non-malignant portal vein thrombosis: comparison of medical and interventional treatment. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020; 52:329-339. [PMID: 32506456 DOI: 10.1111/apt.15811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate medical versus interventional treatment (transjugular thrombus fragmentation, local thrombolysis with or without stent implantation) in patients with acute non-cirrhotic, non-malignant portal vein thrombosis (PVT). METHODS This prospective, observational study enrolled 65 patients with acute (<28 days since begin of symptoms, no cavernoma) PVT in nine centres. Thirty patients received medical treatment and 35 patients received interventional treatment. PVT was graded into grade 1: short thrombosis and incomplete occlusion of the vessel lumen and grade 2: extended thrombosis or complete occlusion. Treatment response was classified as partial or complete, if thrombosis was reduced by one grade or to <25% of the vessel diameter respectively. RESULTS Partial and complete response rates were 7% and 30% in the medical compared to 17% and 54% (P < 0.001) in the interventional treatment group. In the multivariate analysis, interventional treatment showed a strong positive (OR 4.32, P < 0.016) and a myeloproliferative aetiology a negative (OR 0.09, P = 0.006) prediction of complete response. Complications were rare in the medical group and consisted of septicaemia and upper gastrointestinal bleeding of unknown origin in one patient each. Interventional treatment was accompanied by mild and self-limiting bleeding complications in nine patients, moderate intra-abdominal bleeding requiring transfusions (2 units) in one patient and peritoneal bleeding requiring surgical rescue in one patient. Four patients in each group developed intestinal gangrene requiring surgery. One patient died 52 days after unsuccessful interventional treatment. CONCLUSIONS Compared to medical treatment alone, interventional treatment doubled response rates at the cost of increased bleeding complications.
Collapse
|
22
|
Teng F, Sun KY, Fu ZR. Tailored classification of portal vein thrombosis for liver transplantation: Focus on strategies for portal vein inflow reconstruction. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:2691-2701. [PMID: 32550747 PMCID: PMC7284174 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i21.2691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is currently not considered a contraindication for liver transplantation (LT), but diffuse or complicated PVT remains a major surgical challenge. Here, we review the prevalence, natural course and current grading systems of PVT and propose a tailored classification of PVT in the setting of LT. PVT in liver transplant recipients is classified into three types, corresponding to three portal reconstruction strategies: Anatomical, physiological and non-physiological. Type I PVT can be removed via low dissection of the portal vein (PV) or thrombectomy; porto-portal anastomosis is then performed with or without an interposed vascular graft. Physiological reconstruction used for type II PVT includes vascular interposition between mesenteric veins and PV, collateral-PV and splenic vein-PV anastomosis. Non-physiological reconstruction used for type III PVT includes cavoportal hemitransposition, renoportal anastomosis, portal vein arterialization and multivisceral transplantation. All portal reconstruction techniques were reviewed. This tailored classification system stratifies PVT patients by surgical complexity, risk of postoperative complications and long-term survival. We advocate using the tailored classification for PVT grading before LT, which will urge transplant surgeons to make a better preoperative planning and pay more attention to all potential strategies for portal reconstruction. Further verification in a large-sample cohort study is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Teng
- Department of Liver Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China
| | - Ke-Yan Sun
- Department of Liver Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China
| | - Zhi-Ren Fu
- Department of Liver Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bhangui P, Fernandes ESM, Di Benedetto F, Joo DJ, Nadalin S. Current management of portal vein thrombosis in liver transplantation. Int J Surg 2020; 82S:122-127. [PMID: 32387201 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Nontumoral portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is present at liver transplantation (LT) in 5-26% of cirrhotic patients, and is known to affect post LT outcomes. Up to 31% of patients who are found to have PVT at the time of LT, would have had PVT at the time of initial listing, but others develop PVT during the waiting period. Adequate screening and treatment of the PVT on the waiting list for LT is thus essential so that a portoportal anastomoses can be performed at the time of LT. Early PVT (Yerdel Grade I/II) can be usually managed by thrombectomy, whereas Grade III PVT may require a jump graft from the superior mesenteric vein to the graft PV. Complete portomesenteric thrombosis is a huge challenge, and sometimes a cause for denying a LT in these patients, with multivisceral transplant being the only alternative. The presence of spontaneous, or previously surgically created portosytemic shunts like the leinorenal shunt, may serve as a good inflow option (renoportal anastomosis) in these patients to establish a physiological reconstruction. Although challenging, good outcomes are possible in patients with complex PVT if the appropriate surgical technique is chosen to ensure portal inflow and resolution of PHT post LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prashant Bhangui
- Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta-The Medicity, Delhi-NCR, India.
| | - Eduardo S M Fernandes
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery - Rio de Janeiro Federal University and Liver Transplant Unit - São Lucas Hospital RJ, Brazil
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Dong-Jin Joo
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ikegami T, Yoshizumi T, Tomiyama T, Inokuchi S, Mori M. Extensive portal thrombectomy with secure shunt ligation should be more strongly emphasized in the real-world setting. J Hepatol 2020; 72:199-201. [PMID: 31679789 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Toru Ikegami
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
| | - Tomoharu Yoshizumi
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
| | - Takahiro Tomiyama
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
| | - Shoichi Inokuchi
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
| | - Masaki Mori
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bhangui P, Lim C, Levesque E, Salloum C, Lahat E, Feray C, Azoulay D. Novel classification of non-malignant portal vein thrombosis: A guide to surgical decision-making during liver transplantation. J Hepatol 2019; 71:1038-1050. [PMID: 31442476 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2019] [Revised: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is present at liver transplantation in 5% to 26% of cirrhotic patients, and the prevalence of complex PVT as defined here (grade 4 Yerdel, and grade 3,4 Jamieson and Charco) has been reported in 0% to 2.2%. Adequate portal inflow is mandatory to ensure graft and patient survival after liver transplantation. With time, the proposed classifications of non-tumoral chronic PVT have evolved from being anatomy-based, to also incorporating functional parameters. However, none of the currently proposed classifications are directed towards decision-making, regarding the choice of inflow to the graft during transplantation and the outcomes thereof. The present scoping review i) addresses the limits of the currently available classifications in terms of surgical decisiveness, ii) clarifies the concept of physiological or non-physiological portal inflow reconstruction, and subsequently, iii) proposes a new classification of non-tumoral PVT in candidates for liver transplantation; to help tailor the surgical strategy to an individual patient, in order to provide portal inflow to the graft together with control of prehepatic portal hypertension whenever feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prashant Bhangui
- Medanta Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta-The Medicity, New Delhi, India
| | - Chetana Lim
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Eric Levesque
- Liver Intensive Care Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Chady Salloum
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Eylon Lahat
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Sheba Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Cyrille Feray
- Department of Hepatology, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Daniel Azoulay
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Sheba Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hanafy AS, Abd-Elsalam S, Dawoud MM. Randomized controlled trial of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in the management of acute non-neoplastic portal vein thrombosis. Vascul Pharmacol 2019; 113:86-91. [PMID: 29886103 DOI: 10.1016/j.vph.2018.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2018] [Revised: 04/09/2018] [Accepted: 05/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Anticoagulation therapy is the main line of treatment for acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in the absence of cirrhosis. However, the use of this therapy in cirrhotic PVT is still with doubtful evidence. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared to warfarin for the management of acute non-neoplastic PVT in Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related compensated cirrhosis. METHODS Out of 578 patients with chronic HCV infection, 80 patients with acute PVT who had undergone splenectomy due to hypersplenism and 4 patients with acute PVT due to portal pyemia were selected. The patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the study group (n = 40), in which the patients received rivaroxaban 10 mg/12 h, or the control group (n = 40), in which the patients received warfarin. RESULTS In the rivaroxaban group, the resolution of PVT was achieved in 34 patients (85%) within 2.6 ± 0.4 months and delayed, partial recanalization after 6.7 ± 1.2 months (n = 6.15%). Complications such as major bleeding, abnormal liver functions, death, or recurrence did not occur during treatment, and patients in this group showed improved short-term survival rate (20.4 ± 2.2 months) compared to the survival rate in the control group (10.6 ± 1.8 months) in which warfarin achieved complete resolution in 45% of patients. Complications such as severe upper GI tract bleeding (43.3%), hepatic decompensation (22.5%), progression to mesenteric ischemia (12.5%), recurrence (10%), and death (20%) were observed in the control group. The duration until complete resolution of thrombus correlated with age, the extent of the thrombus, creatinine level, and MELD score. The recurrence after complete resolution of thrombus correlated with age, the extent of the thrombus, thrombogenic gene polymorphism, and the use of warfarin. CONCLUSION Rivaroxaban was effective and safe in acute HCV-related non-neoplastic PVT with improved short-term survival rate; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03201367.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amr Shaaban Hanafy
- Internal Medicine Department, Hepatology Division, Zagazig University, Egypt.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Portomesenteric Thrombosis Secondary to Acute Cholecystitis: A Case Report. Case Rep Gastrointest Med 2018; 2018:9409081. [PMID: 30159180 PMCID: PMC6106975 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9409081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Portomesenteric venous thrombosis (PMVT) is an uncommon clinical problem. Common risk factors include intra-abdominal infections, abdominal surgeries, malignancy, cirrhosis, and inherited thrombophilia. Early recognition and treatment of PMVT are important to avoid serious complications like mesenteric ischemia and infarction. Acute cholecystitis is a clinical condition encountered daily but rarely may be complicated by development of portomesenteric venous thrombosis. Only few cases have been reported of superior mesenteric vein thrombosis secondary to cholecystitis. We report a case of a forty-one-year-old male patient who developed partial portal and superior mesenteric vein thrombosis after mild acute cholecystitis for which surgery had been deferred. Patient had no other identifiable risk factors for thrombosis. Patient was successfully treated with 6 months of anticoagulation with warfarin and complete recanalization of portomesenteric veins was achieved at the end of treatment.
Collapse
|
28
|
Hicks AM, DeRosa A, Raj M, Do R, Yu KH, Lowery MA, Varghese A, O'Reilly EM. Visceral Thromboses in Pancreas Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2018; 17:e207-e216. [PMID: 29306522 PMCID: PMC6752720 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2017.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2017] [Revised: 11/06/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Within gastrointestinal malignancies, primary hepatocellular carcinoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are frequently associated with visceral thromboses (VT). Thrombus formation in the portal (PVT), mesenteric (MVT), or splenic vein (SVT) system leads to portal hypertension and intestinal ischemia. VT in PDAC may convey a risk of increased distal thrombosis and poses therapeutic uncertainty regarding the role of anticoagulation. An increasing number of reports describe VT associated with PDAC. It is possible that early diagnosis of these events may help reduce morbidity and speculatively improve oncologic outcomes. To perform a systematic review to study PVT, MVT, and SVT associated with PDAC, and to provide a comprehensive review. Medline/PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Data Extraction and Assessment: Two blinded independent observers extracted and assessed the studies for diagnosis of PVT, MVT, and SVT in PDAC. Studies were restricted to English-language literature published between 2007 and 2016. Eleven articles were identified. Five case reports and 7 retrospective studies were found, with a total of 127 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. The mean age at diagnosis was 64 years. PVT was found in 35% (n = 46), SVT in 52% (n = 65), and MVT in 13% (n = 15). Mean follow-up time was 26 months. Only 3 of the selected articles studied the impact of anticoagulation in VT. All patients with nonvisceral thrombosis (eg, deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary emboli) were therapeutically treated; in contrast, patients with VT only rarely received treatment. VT in PDAC is a frequent finding at diagnosis or during disease progression. Evidence to guide treatment choices is limited, and current management is based on inferred experience from nononcologic settings. Anticoagulation appears to be safe in VT, with most of the large studies recommending a careful assessment for patients at a high risk of bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antonio DeRosa
- Medical Library, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Micheal Raj
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Richard Do
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kenneth H Yu
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Maeve A Lowery
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Anna Varghese
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kawano Y, Murata S, Taniai N, Yoshioka M, Hirakata A, Mizuguchi Y, Shimizu T, Kanda T, Ueda J, Takada H, Yoshida H, Akimaru K, Onozawa S, Kumita S, Uchida E. Interventional Treatment of Severe Portal Vein Thrombosis after Living-Donor Liver Transplantation. J NIPPON MED SCH 2017; 83:206-210. [PMID: 27890896 DOI: 10.1272/jnms.83.206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a rare complication of liver transplantation which can lead to graft failure and patient death. Treatment can be difficult, especially in cases of PVT from the intrahepatic portal vein to the proximal jejunal veins. A 55-year-old woman had undergone living-donor liver transplantation with splenectomy for end-stage liver cirrhosis due to hepatitis C with hepatocellular carcinoma. Ten months after transplantation, massive ascites and slight abdominal pain developed, and computed tomography revealed a PVT between the intrahepatic portal vein and the superior mesenteric vein. Repeated interventional radiology procedures were used in combination with thrombolysis, thrombectomy, and metallic stent replacement to obtain favorable portal flow to the graft. Five years after being treated, the patient is well, with favorable portal flow having been confirmed. In conclusion, repeated and assiduous interventional radiological treatment combined with thrombolytic therapy, thrombectomy, and metallic stent replacement could be important for severe PVT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youichi Kawano
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lancellotti S, Basso M, Veca V, Sacco M, Riccardi L, Pompili M, De Cristofaro R. Presence of portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis is strongly associated with low levels of ADAMTS-13: a pilot study. Intern Emerg Med 2016; 11:959-67. [PMID: 27220954 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-016-1467-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2016] [Accepted: 05/13/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) dramatically changes the prognosis of cirrhotic patients, especially those waiting for liver transplantation. However, the possible contribution to PVT of von Willebrand factor (VWF) and ADAMTS-13 is poorly documented. The aim of our study was to assess the presence of alterations of VWF and ADAMTS-13 serum levels in cirrhotic patients with PVT. Twenty-four patients with PVT (group PVT) and 60 without PVT (group without PVT) were enrolled. A comprehensive analysis of biochemical and hemostatic parameters was performed. ADAMTS-13 activity was significantly lower in group A (median 16.8 vs. 69.1 %, p = 0.0047). Group PVT, compared to group without PVT, showed a significantly higher VWF:act, (median 308.4 vs 203.3 %, p = 0.032), whereas no difference was observed for VWF:Ag, FVIII level and the presence of risk factors for venous thromboembolism. No correlation was found between the Child-Pugh score and ADAMTS-13 activity. In multivariable logistic regression analysis performed on data concerning both group PVT and without PVT, only the ADAMTS-13 activity (p = 0.007) was independently and inversely associated with PVT. In conclusion, ADAMTS-13 activity is independently associated with PVT in cirrhotic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Lancellotti
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Institute of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Center for Hemorrhagic and Thrombotic Diseases and Haemophilia Center, "A. Gemelli" Hospital, Catholic University School of Medicine, Largo A. Gemelli, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Basso
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Institute of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Center for Hemorrhagic and Thrombotic Diseases and Haemophilia Center, "A. Gemelli" Hospital, Catholic University School of Medicine, Largo A. Gemelli, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Vito Veca
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Institute of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Center for Hemorrhagic and Thrombotic Diseases and Haemophilia Center, "A. Gemelli" Hospital, Catholic University School of Medicine, Largo A. Gemelli, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Monica Sacco
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Institute of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Center for Hemorrhagic and Thrombotic Diseases and Haemophilia Center, "A. Gemelli" Hospital, Catholic University School of Medicine, Largo A. Gemelli, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Riccardi
- Department of Digestive, Endocrine and Metabolic System, Institute of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, "A. Gemelli" Hospital, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Pompili
- Department of Digestive, Endocrine and Metabolic System, Institute of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, "A. Gemelli" Hospital, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Raimondo De Cristofaro
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Institute of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Center for Hemorrhagic and Thrombotic Diseases and Haemophilia Center, "A. Gemelli" Hospital, Catholic University School of Medicine, Largo A. Gemelli, 00168, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sarin SK, Philips CA, Kamath PS, Choudhury A, Maruyama H, Nery FG, Valla DC. Toward a Comprehensive New Classification of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Patients With Cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2016; 151:574-577.e3. [PMID: 27575821 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.08.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Shiv K Sarin
- Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Use of Left Gastric Vein as an Alternative for Portal Flow Reconstruction in Liver Transplantation. Case Rep Surg 2016; 2016:8289045. [PMID: 27595034 PMCID: PMC4993930 DOI: 10.1155/2016/8289045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2016] [Accepted: 07/18/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Portal vein thrombosis is observed in up to 10% of liver transplant candidates, hindering execution of the procedure. A dilated gastric vein is an alternative to portal vein reconstruction and decompression of splanchnic bed. We present two cases of patients with portal cavernoma and dilated left gastric vein draining splanchnic bed who underwent liver transplantation. The vein was dissected and sectioned near the cardia; the proximal segment was ligated with suture and the distal segment was anastomosed to the donor portal vein. Gastroportal anastomosis is an excellent option for portal reconstruction in the presence of thrombosis or hypoplasia. It allows an adequate splanchnic drainage and direction of hepatotrophic factors to the graft.
Collapse
|
33
|
Gao PJ, Gao J, Li Z, Hu ZP, Leng XS, Zhu JY. Liver transplantation in adults with portal vein thrombosis: Data from the China Liver Transplant Registry. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2016; 40:327-332. [PMID: 26500198 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2015.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2015] [Revised: 05/07/2015] [Accepted: 05/11/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a common complication in patients with liver cirrhosis. During liver transplantation (LT), PVT may complicate the procedure and lead to a poor prognosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate patients enrolled in the China Liver Transplant Registry, to understand the influence of PVT to the LT recipients. METHODS We collected data from patients who underwent LT and were entered into the China Liver Transplant Registry. All data of medical records and follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The preoperative condition, duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative early and late PVT, and survival rates were compared between patients with PVT and those without PVT. Multivariate Cox analysis and survival analysis were used to determine the influence of PVT. RESULTS A total of 20,524 cases were recruited into the study. In all, 1810 (8.82%) patients were diagnosed with preoperative PVT of various severities. All patients were followed up for an average of 30.25±33.25months (up to a maximum of 171.68months). Patients with PVT had a significantly longer operating time, more intraoperative blood loss and a higher rate of post-LT PVT (P<0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that PVT did not reduce the recipients' survival rate (HR=0.89, 95% CI: 0.774-1.024, P=0.103). There was no significant difference in cumulative survival rate (P=0.059) between patients without PVT, and patients with PVT. CONCLUSIONS PVT increases the difficulty of LT, but doesn't reduce the survival rate. Therefore, PVT is not an absolute contraindication for LT in experienced transplantation centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Ji Gao
- Department of hepatobiliary surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
| | - Jie Gao
- Department of hepatobiliary surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
| | - Zhao Li
- Department of hepatobiliary surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
| | - Zhi Ping Hu
- Department of hepatobiliary surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
| | - Xi Sheng Leng
- Department of hepatobiliary surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
| | - Ji Ye Zhu
- Department of hepatobiliary surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Pretransplant Portal Vein Recanalization-Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in Patients With Complete Obliterative Portal Vein Thrombosis. Transplantation 2016; 99:2347-55. [PMID: 25905983 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000000729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic, obliterative portal vein (PV) thrombosis (PVT) represents a relative contraindication to liver transplantation (LT) in some centers. When PV thromboembolectomy is not feasible, alternative techniques (portacaval hemitransposition, portal arterialization, multivisceral transplantation) are associated with suboptimal outcomes. In cases where a chronically thrombosed PV has become obliterated, we developed PV recanalization (PVR)-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) to potentiate LT. We evaluated the impact of PVR-TIPS on liver function, transplant eligibility, and long-term outcomes after LT. METHODS Forty-four patients with chronic obliterative main PVT were identified during our institutional LT selection committee. After joint imaging review by transplant surgery/radiology, these patients underwent PVR-TIPS to potentiate transplant eligibility. Patients were followed by hepatology/transplant until LT, and ultimately in posttransplant clinic. The TIPS venography and serial ultrasound/MRI were used subsequently to document PV patency. RESULTS The main PV (MPV) was completely thrombosed in 17 of 44 (39%) patients; near complete (>95%) occlusion was noted in 27 of 44 (61%) patients. Direct transhepatic and transsplenic punctures were required in 11 of 43 (26%) and 3 of 43 (7%) cases, respectively. Technical success was 43 of 44 (98%) cases. At PVR-TIPS completion, persistence of MPV thrombus was noted in 33 of 43 (77%) cases. One-month TIPS venography demonstrated complete resolution of MPV thrombosis in 22 of 29 (76%) without anticoagulation. Thirty-six patients were listed for transplantation; 18 (50%) have been transplanted. Eighty-nine percent MPV patency rate and 82% survival were achieved at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS The PVR-TIPS may be considered for patients with obliterative PVT who are otherwise appropriate candidates for LT. The high rate of MPV patency post-TIPS placement suggests flow reestablishment as the dominant mechanism of thrombus resolution.
Collapse
|
35
|
Pardo F, Pons JA, Briceño J. V Reunión de Consenso de la Sociedad Española de Trasplante Hepático sobre receptores de riesgo elevado, escenarios actuales de inmunosupresión y manejo del hepatocarcinoma en espera de trasplante. Cir Esp 2015; 93:619-37. [PMID: 26187597 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2015.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2015] [Accepted: 04/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
36
|
V Reunión de Consenso de la Sociedad Española de Trasplante Hepático sobre receptores de riesgo elevado, escenarios actuales de inmunosupresión y manejo del hepatocarcinoma en espera de trasplante. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2015; 38:600-18. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2015.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2015] [Revised: 06/11/2015] [Accepted: 06/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
37
|
Imaging Diagnosis of Splanchnic Venous Thrombosis. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015; 2015:101029. [PMID: 26600801 PMCID: PMC4620257 DOI: 10.1155/2015/101029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2015] [Accepted: 04/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a broad term that includes Budd-Chiari syndrome and occlusion of veins that constitute the portal venous system. Due to the common risk factors involved in the pathogenesis of these clinically distinct disorders, concurrent involvement of two different regions is quite common. In acute and subacute SVT, the symptoms may overlap with a variety of other abdominal emergencies while in chronic SVT, the extent of portal hypertension and its attendant complications determine the clinical course. As a result, clinical diagnosis is often difficult and is frequently reliant on imaging. Tremendous improvements in vascular imaging in recent years have ensured that this once rare entity is being increasingly detected. Treatment of acute SVT requires immediate anticoagulation. Transcatheter thrombolysis or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is used in the event of clinical deterioration. In cases with peritonitis, immediate laparotomy and bowel resection may be required for irreversible bowel ischemia. In chronic SVT, the underlying cause should be identified and treated. The imaging manifestations of the clinical syndromes resulting from SVT are comprehensively discussed here along with a brief review of the relevant clinical features and therapeutic approach.
Collapse
|
38
|
|
39
|
Abstract
Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is the blockage or narrowing of the portal vein by a thrombus. It is relatively rare and has been linked with the presence of an underlying liver disease or prothrombotic disorders. We present a case of a young male who presented with vague abdominal symptoms for approximately one week. Imaging revealed the presence of multiple nonocclusive thrombi involving the right portal vein, the splenic vein, and the left renal vein, as well as complete occlusion of the left portal vein and the superior mesenteric vein. We discuss pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and management of both acute and chronic thrombosis. The presence of PVT should be considered as a clue for prothrombotic disorders, liver disease, and other local and general factors that must be carefully investigated. It is hoped that this case report will help increase awareness of the complexity associated with portal vein thrombosis among the medical community.
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a rare event in the general medical setting that commonly complicates cirrhosis with portal hypertension, and can also occur with liver tumors. The diagnosis is often incidental when a thrombus is found in the portal vein on imaging tests. However, PVT may also present with clinical symptoms and can progress to life-threatening complications of ischemic hepatitis, liver failure, and/or small intestinal infarction. This article reviews the pathophysiology of this disorder, with a major focus on PVT in patients with cirrhosis, and presents detailed guidelines on optimal diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed Abdul Basit
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nevada School of Medicine, 2040 West Charleston Boulevard, Suite 300, Las Vegas, NV 89102, USA
| | - Christian D Stone
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nevada School of Medicine, 2040 West Charleston Boulevard, Suite 300, Las Vegas, NV 89102, USA
| | - Robert Gish
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Alway Building, Room M211, 300 Pasteur Drive, MC: 5187 Stanford, CA 94305-5187, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ma J, Yan Z, Luo J, Liu Q, Wang J, Qiu S. Rational classification of portal vein thrombosis and its clinical significance. PLoS One 2014; 9:e112501. [PMID: 25393320 PMCID: PMC4231054 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2014] [Accepted: 10/19/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is commonly classified into acute (symptom duration <60 days and absence of portal carvernoma and portal hypertension) and chronic types. However, the rationality of this classification has received little attention. In this study, 60 patients (40 men and 20 women) with PVT were examined using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). The percentage of vein occlusion, including portal vein (PV) and superior mesenteric vein (SMV), was measured on CT image. Of 60 patients, 17 (28.3%) met the criterion of acute PVT. Symptoms occurred more frequently in patients with superior mesenteric vein thrombosis (SMVT) compared to those without SMVT (p<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in PV occlusion between patients with and without symptoms. The frequency of cavernous transformation was significantly higher in patients with complete PVT than those with partial PVT (p<0.001). Complications of portal hypertension were significantly associated with cirrhosis (p<0.001) rather than with the severity of PVT and presence of cavernoma. These results suggest that the severity of PVT is only associated with the formation of portal cavernoma but unrelated to the onset of symptoms and the development of portal hypertension. We classified PVT into complete and partial types, and each was subclassified into with and without portal cavernoma. In conclusion, neither symptom duration nor cavernous transformation can clearly distinguish between acute and chronic PVT. The new classification system can determine the pathological alterations of PVT, patency of portal vein and outcome of treatment in a longitudinal study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingqin Ma
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiping Yan
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- * E-mail:
| | - Jianjun Luo
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qingxin Liu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianhua Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shijing Qiu
- Bone and Mineral Research Laboratory, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bieker TM. Sonographic Evaluation of a Cavoportal Hemitransposition Liver Transplant. JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY 2014. [DOI: 10.1177/8756479314549195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Extensive portal vein thrombosis is no longer considered a contraindication for liver transplantation. With cavoportal hemitransposition (portal diversion) or other surgical techniques, patients with portal vein thrombosis who would otherwise succumb to their liver disease are able to receive a transplant. A series of three cases is presented describing the evaluation and liver transplant procedures in patients with portal vein thrombosis. Sonography is shown to be an important tool both for diagnosing portal vein thrombosis and evaluating the portal system following transplantation.
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a fairly common complication of liver cirrhosis. Importantly, occlusive PVT might influence the prognosis of patients with cirrhosis. Evidence from a randomized controlled trial has shown that anticoagulation can prevent the occurrence of PVT in patients with cirrhosis without prior PVT. Evidence from several case series has also demonstrated that anticoagulation can achieve portal vein recanalization in patients with cirrhosis and PVT. Early initiation of anticoagulation therapy and absence of previous portal hypertensive bleeding might be positively associated with a high rate of portal vein recanalization after anticoagulation. However, the possibility of spontaneous resolution of partial PVT questions the necessity of anticoagulation for the treatment of partial PVT. In addition, a relatively low recanalization rate of complete PVT after anticoagulation therapy suggests its limited usefulness in patients with complete PVT. Successful insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) not only recanalizes the thrombosed portal vein, but also relieves the symptomatic portal hypertension. However, the technical difficulty of TIPS potentially limits its widespread application, and the risk and benefits should be fully balanced. Notably, current recommendations regarding the management of PVT in liver cirrhosis are insufficient owing to low-quality evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingshun Qi
- Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, No. 17 West Changle Road, Xi'an, 710032 China
| | - Guohong Han
- Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, No. 17 West Changle Road, Xi'an, 710032 China
| | - Daiming Fan
- Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, No. 17 West Changle Road, Xi'an, 710032 China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Liu PH, Lee YH, Hsia CY, Hsu CY, Huang YH, Chiou YY, Lin HC, Huo TI. Surgical resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21:1825-33. [PMID: 24499831 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3510-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2013] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The long-term survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) who received surgical resection (SR) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains unclear. We compared the efficacy of SR and TACE by using a propensity score analysis. METHODS A total of 247 and 181 HCC patients with PVTT undergoing SR and TACE, respectively, were evaluated. One hundred eight pairs of matched patients were selected from each treatment arm by using a propensity score analysis. RESULTS Of all patients, the estimated 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of patients receiving SR and TACE were 85 versus 60 %, 68 versus 42 %, and 61 versus 33 %, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients selected for SR were significantly younger and had better liver functional reserve, performance status, and smaller tumor burden. In the propensity model, the survival benefit of SR remained significant. The estimated 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of patients receiving SR and TACE were 84 versus 71 %, 69 versus 50 %, and 59 versus 35 %, respectively (p = 0.004). The two groups of patients in the propensity score analysis were similar in baseline characteristics. In the Cox proportional hazards model, patients receiving TACE had a 2.044-fold increased risk of mortality compared with patients receiving SR (95 % confidence interval: 1.284-3.252, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS For either unselected patients or patients in the propensity model, SR provides significantly better long-term survival than TACE. SR should be considered as a priority treatment in this subgroup of HCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Po-Hong Liu
- Faculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ponziani FR, Zocco MA, Senzolo M, Pompili M, Gasbarrini A, Avolio AW. Portal vein thrombosis and liver transplantation: implications for waiting list period, surgical approach, early and late follow-up. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2014; 28:92-101. [PMID: 24582320 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2014.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2013] [Revised: 09/19/2013] [Accepted: 01/19/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a well-known and relatively common complication of liver cirrhosis. In the past, PVT was considered as a contraindication for liver transplantation (LT). To characterize prevalence, risk factors, perioperative management and outcome of PVT in the setting of LT, the English literature published between 1991 and 2011 was reviewed. Of 6807 articles, 280 were selected, and 39 experiences were analyzed in detail (methodology, type and duration of treatments, peri-operative management, strategy to avoid recurrence, strengths and weaknesses, Oxford evidence level, citations). 3/39 studies were prospective; 9/39 were based on prospectively recorded databases; no studies of 1, 2a, 3a level of evidence were present; 5/39 were recognized as level 2b, 23/39 as level 3b, and 8/39 as level 4. High complication rate has been reported with consequent effect on graft and patient survival. Overall, PVT presents today good results similar to those obtained in patients without PVT undergoing LT even if they require a higher transfusion number and a longer ICU/hospital stay. Reported cases were retrospectively stratified according to Yerdel classification. Grade 1-2 patients (76%) do well with eversion thromboendovenectomy, resection of damaged vein and porto-portal anastomosis. Results of patients with grade 3-4 (24%) are inferior, however data on outcome in this subsets are fragmented and do not allow a reliable analysis. Moreover, results obtained in grade 3-4 cases are better in transplant centers with large specific experience. The small number of reports suggests caution. The role of anticoagulant treatment is still debated. Although in cirrhotics with PVT LT remains a demanding procedure, PVT should not be considered a contraindication anymore.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Romana Ponziani
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Catholic University, Agostino Gemelli Hospital, Rome, Italy.
| | - Maria Assunta Zocco
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Catholic University, Agostino Gemelli Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Senzolo
- Department of surgical, Oncological, and Gastroenterological Sciences University hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Maurizio Pompili
- Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University, Agostino Gemelli Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Catholic University, Agostino Gemelli Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alfonso Wolfango Avolio
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Division of General Surgery and Organs Transplantation, Catholic University, Agostino Gemelli Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Song S, Kwon CHD, Shin M, Kim TS, Lee S, Moon HH, Park JB, Kim SJ, Joh JW, Lee SK. A new technique for complete portal vein and superior mesenteric vein thrombosis in a liver transplant recipient. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2013; 12:67-70. [PMID: 23901822 DOI: 10.6002/ect.2012.0285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
We describe a deceased-donor liver transplant recipient with grade 3 complete portal vein and superior mesenteric vein thromboses, which was successfully managed with an extensive thrombectomy through the venotomy site of superior mesenteric vein. In this case report, we suggest our method as an option for grade 3 portal vein thromboses, and discuss other options available for recipients with portal vein thromboses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanghyun Song
- Department of Surgery, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Anseo-dong San 16-5 Cheonan-si Chungcheongnam-do, Korea 330-715
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Management of nonneoplastic portal vein thrombosis in the setting of liver transplantation: a systematic review. Transplantation 2013; 94:1145-53. [PMID: 23128996 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e31826e8e53] [Citation(s) in RCA: 161] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nonneoplastic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is frequent in patients with cirrhosis who undergo liver transplantation (LT); however, data on its impact on outcome and strategies of management are sparse. METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed by analyzing studies that report on PVT in LT recipients and were published between January 1986 and January 2012. RESULTS Of 25,753 liver transplants, 2004 were performed in patients with PVT (7.78%), and approximately half presented complete thrombosis. Thrombectomy/thromboendovenectomy was employed in 75% of patients; other techniques included venous graft interposition and portocaval hemitransposition. Overall, the presence of PVT significantly increased 30-day (10.5%) and 1-year (18.8%) post-LT mortality when compared to patients without PVT (7.7% and 15.4%, respectively). However, only complete PVT accounted for this increased mortality. Rethrombosis occurred in up to 13% of patients with complete PVT and in whom no preventative strategies were used, and was associated with increased morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS PVT is common in patients with cirrhosis undergoing LT, and it affects survival when it is complete, at least in the short term after transplant. Therefore, screening for this condition is essential, alongside adequate treatment strategies to attempt repermeation of the PV and prevent thrombosis extension.
Collapse
|
48
|
Pécora RAA, Canedo BF, Andraus W, Martino RBD, Santos VR, Arantes RM, Pugliese V, D´Albuquerque LAC. Trombose de veia porta no transplante hepático. ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA 2012; 25:273-8. [DOI: 10.1590/s0102-67202012000400012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2011] [Accepted: 06/17/2012] [Indexed: 02/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUÇÃO: A trombose de veia porta foi considerada contraindicação ao transplante de fígado no passado em razão da elevada morbi-mortalidade. Diversos avanços permitiram melhora dos resultados. OBJETIVO: Revisão dos avanços e das estratégias cirúrgicas utilizadas para realização do transplante de fígado na vigência de trombose de veia porta. MÉTODO: Revisão da literatura nas bases de dados Medline, Scielo, Lilacs cruzando os descritores: portal vein thrombosis, liver transplantation, vascular complications, jump graft, graft failure, multivisceral transplant. Foram estudados a epidemiologia, fatores de risco, classificação, diagnóstico, estratégias cirúrgicas e resultados. CONCLUSÃO: A trombose de veia porta deixou de ser contraindicação para o transplante hepático. O cirurgião dispõe atualmente de uma série de estratégias para realização do transplante, variando conforme o grau da trombose. Apesar de implicar em maior morbidade e taxas de re-trombose, os resultados do transplante na presença de trombose portal são semelhantes aos observados nas séries habituais.
Collapse
|
49
|
Mizuno S, Murata Y, Kuriyama N, Ohsawa I, Kishiwada M, Hamada T, Usui M, Sakurai H, Tabata M, Isaji S. Living donor liver transplantation for the patients with portal vein thrombosis: use of an interpositional venous graft passed posteriorly to the pancreatic parenchyma without using jump graft. Transplant Proc 2012; 44:356-9. [PMID: 22410015 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.01.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is difficult to reconstruct the portal vein (PV) using a long interpositional venous graft in living donor liver transplant (LDLT) patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT), which involves the confluence of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and splenic vein (SV). We successfully performed LDLT for three patients with PVT using an interpositional vascular conduit passing posterior to the pancreas without a jump graft. METHODS Three of 130 patients who underwent LDLT in our hospital between March 2002 and June 2011 required this technique. After indentifying the location of the SMV, SV and gastrocolic trunk, we ligated and cut the posterior superior pancreaticoduodenal vein and other short branches from the PV. The PV was drawn inferiorly to the pancreas and transected at the confluence of SMV and SV. The external iliac vein or internal jugular vein was sacrificed as a graft for anastomosis to the cut end of the SMV using 6-0 polypropylene running sutures. Then the venous graft was drawn superiorly to the pancreas by passing it posterior to the pancreas parenchyma for anastomosis to the liver graft PV. The interpositional vein was placed posterior to the pancreas where the PV used to be. RESULTS All three patients displayed favorable postoperative courses with the Doppler ultrasound demonstrating good portal flow perioperatively. The postoperative portogram demonstrated patency of the vascular graft. CONCLUSION This method is easy and helpful to treat portal vein thrombosis, by providing the shortest route between the PV of the donor and the SMV of the recipient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Mizuno
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Qi X, Han G. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the treatment of portal vein thrombosis: a critical review of literature. Hepatol Int 2012; 6. [PMID: 26201472 PMCID: PMC7101972 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-011-9324-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Reports of successful transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) surgery in patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) are considered anecdotal owing to the technical difficulty of the procedure and potential procedure-related complications. A literature review was undertaken to determine the feasibility and safety of TIPS in the treatment of PVT. All studies in which TIPS was attempted in patients with PVT were identified by searching through the PUBMED and MEDLINE databases. A total of 424 PVT patients undergoing TIPS were reported in 54 articles. The success rate of TIPS insertion was 67-100% in 19 case series. Further, 85 patients with portal cavernoma underwent successful TIPS insertions. Three therapeutic strategies of TIPS placement were used: (1) TIPS placement followed by portal vein recanalization via the shunt, (2) portal vein recanalization via percutaneous approaches followed by TIPS placement, and (3) TIPS insertion between a hepatic vein and a large collateral vessel without portal vein recanalization. Four approaches were used to access the portal vein: transjugular, transhepatic, transsplenic, and transmesenteric. Intra-abdominal hemorrhage secondary to hepatic capsule perforation was lethal in only three patients. No episode of pulmonary embolism was reported. Other procedure-related complications were reversible. The overall incidence of shunt dysfunction and hepatic encephalopathy was 8-33% and 0-50%, respectively. In conclusion, the reviewed studies uniformly support the feasibility and safety of TIPS for PVT even in the presence of portal cavernoma. Further, several major issues that remain unresolved are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingshun Qi
- Fourth Military Medical University, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, 15 West Changle Road, Xi'an, 710032, China
| | - Guohong Han
- Fourth Military Medical University, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, 15 West Changle Road, Xi'an, 710032, China.
| |
Collapse
|