This review article has for major main objectives to give an overlook of the major physiological effects of somatostatin on different organs. It will cover first the general aspect of the hormone, its cDNA and its protein maturation process, as well as its characterization in various organs. This aspect will be followed by the factors involved in the control of its secretion, its intracellular mode of action, and its general action on physiological processes. Secondly, the review will focus on the pancreas, looking at its in vivo and in vitro actions with special attention on its effects on normal pancreas growth and pancreatic tumors.

Somatostatin is an important modulator of neurotransmission in the central nervous system and acts as a potent inhibitor of hormone and exocrine secretion and regulator of cell proliferation in the periphery. These pleiotropic actions occur through interaction with five G protein-coupled somatostatin receptor subtypes (sst(1) (-) (5)) that are widely expressed in the brain and peripheral organs. The characterization of somatostatin's effects can be investigated by pharmacological or genetic approaches using newly developed selective sst agonists and antagonists and mice lacking specific sst subtypes. Recent evidence points toward a divergent action of somatostatin in the brain and in the periphery to regulate circulating levels of ghrelin, an orexigenic hormone produced by the endocrine X/A-like cells in the rat gastric mucosa. Somatostatin interacts with the sst(2) in the brain to induce an increase in basal ghrelin plasma levels and counteracts the visceral stress-related decrease in circulating ghrelin. By contrast, stimulation of peripheral somatostatin-sst(2) signaling results in the inhibition of basal ghrelin release and mediates the postoperative decrease in circulating ghrelin. The peripheral sst(2)-mediated reduction of plasma ghrelin is likely to involve a paracrine action of D cell-derived somatostatin acting on sst(2) bearing X/A-like ghrelin cells in the gastric mucosa. The other member of the somatostatin family, named cortistatin, in addition to binding to sst(1) (-) (5) also directly interacts with the ghrelin receptor and therefore may simultaneously modulate ghrelin release and actions at target sites bearing ghrelin receptors representing a link between the ghrelin and somatostatin systems.

In 1972, Brazeau et al. isolated somatostatin (somatotropin release-inhibiting factor, SRIF), a cyclic polypeptide with two biologically active isoforms (SRIF-14 and SRIF-28). This event prompted the successful quest for SRIF receptors. Then, nearly a quarter of a century later, it was announced that a neuropeptide, to be named cortistatin (CST), had been cloned, bearing strong resemblance to SRIF. Evidence of special CST receptors never emerged, however. CST rather competed with both SRIF isoforms for specific receptor binding. And binding to the known subtypes with affinities in the nanomolar range, it has therefore been acknowledged to be a third endogenous ligand at SRIF receptors. This review goes through mechanisms of signal transduction, pharmacology, and anatomical distribution of SRIF receptors. Structurally, SRIF receptors belong to the superfamily of G protein-coupled (GPC) receptors, sharing the characteristic seven-transmembrane-segment (STMS) topography. Years of intensive research have resulted in cloning of five receptor subtypes (sst(1)-sst(5)), one of which is represented by two splice variants (sst(2A) and sst(2B)). The individual subtypes, functionally coupled to the effectors of signal transduction, are differentially expressed throughout the mammalian organism, with corresponding differences in physiological impact. It is evident that receptor function, from a physiological point of view, cannot simply be reduced to the accumulated operations of individual receptors. Far from being isolated functional units, receptors co-operate. The total receptor apparatus of individual cell types is composed of different-ligand receptors (e.g. SRIF and non-SRIF receptors) and co-expressed receptor subtypes (e.g. sst(2) and sst(5) receptors) in characteristic proportions. In other words, levels of individual receptor subtypes are highly cell-specific and vary with the co-expression of different-ligand receptors. However, the question is how to quantify the relative contributions of individual receptor subtypes to the integration of transduced signals, ultimately the result of collective receptor activity. The generation of knock-out (KO) mice, intended as a means to define the contributions made by individual receptor subtypes, necessarily marks but an approximation. Furthermore, we must now take into account the stunning complexity of receptor co-operation indicated by the observation of receptor homo- and heterodimerisation, let alone oligomerisation. Theoretically, this phenomenon adds a novel series of functional megareceptors/super-receptors, with varied pharmacological profiles, to the catalogue of monomeric receptor subtypes isolated and cloned in the past. SRIF analogues include both peptides and non-peptides, receptor agonists and antagonists. Relatively long half lives, as compared to those of the endogenous ligands, have been paramount from the outset. Motivated by theoretical puzzles or the shortcomings of present-day diagnostics and therapy, investigators have also aimed to produce subtype-selective analogues. Several have become available.

Although somatostatin inhibits pancreatic exocrine secretion, the inhibitory mechanism of endogenous somatostatin is not clearly understood.

To investigate the effect of endogenous somatostatin on the interaction between endogenous insulin and exogenous cholecystokinin (CCK) in exocrine secretion of the totally isolated, perfused rat pancreas.

Endogenous releases of somatostatin and insulin were induced by 18 mM glucose. Streptozotocin (75 mg/kg) or cysteamine (300 mg/kg) was injected into rats 24 hours before the experiment to deplete insulin or somatostatin in the pancreas.

Glucose (18 mM) enhanced CCK (10 pM)-stimulated secretions of fluid and amylase in the normal pancreas, which was further elevated by a somatostatin antagonist. Exogenous insulin (100 nM) also enhanced CCK-stimulated secretions in the streptozotocin-treated pancreas, which was also markedly increased by the somatostatin antagonist. The glucose (18 mM)-enhanced CCK-stimulated secretions were much higher in the cysteamine-treated pancreas than in the normal pancreas, which was dose-dependently reduced by exogenous somatostatin (30, 100 pM). However, endogenous or exogenous somatostatin did not modify the pancreatic responses to CCK alone.

Endogenous somatostatin inhibits the interaction of endogenous insulin and CCK on pancreatic exocrine secretion in the rat rather than reducing the action of CCK alone or endogenous release of insulin.

Numerous studies have reported diverse effects of gut-derived regulatory peptides on growth of the normal pancreas, pancreatic neoplasms induced experimentally in animals, and pancreatic cancer cell lines, but the results of these investigations are rather controversial. The stimulatory effect of epidermal growth factor (EGF) on cell proliferation of pancreatic cell lines is well established. Whether this action can be modulated by somatostatin is not clear. Furthermore, it is not certain whether another regulatory peptide, cholecystokinin (CCK), affects the proliferation of these cells. In the present study we investigated the presence of CCK-A and CCK-B, as well as somatostatin-2 (SSTR2) receptors by RT-PCR, and studied the actions of EGF, CCK and octreotide on DNA synthesis in the human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line Capan-2. Octreotide, a long-acting somatostatin analogue was used as somatostatin agonist. Cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium. They were incubated in serum free medium containing 0.2% BSA in the absence (control) or the presence of the peptides. [3H]-thymidine incorporation into DNA was measured after 48 h of incubation. By means of RT-PCR analysis we were able to demonstrate SSTR2 expression, but not CCK-A or CCK-B receptor mRNA in Capan-2 cells. DNA synthesis evaluated by [3H]-thymidine incorporation was found to be increased by 45.2 +/- 5.6% in response to EGF (10(-8) M) and decreased by 11.7 +/- 2.6% to octreotide (10(-8) M) compared to controls (P < 0.01). The increase in [3H]-thymidine incorporation was significantly lower when EGF treatment was combined with octreotide administration (10.1 +/- 2.5% over control). In the concentration range of 10(-11)-10(-8) M, CCK did not alter significantly the incorporation of [3H]-thymidine into DNA in Capan-2 cells. In conclusion, these data support a role for EGF as a growth factor for the human pancreatic cancer cell Capan-2. Somatostatin may play an important role in regulating cell proliferation in Capan-2 cells both under basal, and growth factor-stimulated conditions. Our results suggest, however, that CCK receptors are not expressed, and CCK does not affect cell proliferation in this transformed pancreatic cell line.

A CCK-deficient mouse mutant generated by gene targeting in embryonic stem cells was analyzed to determine the importance of CCK for growth and function of the exocrine pancreas and for pancreatic adaptation to dietary changes. RIAs confirmed the absence of CCK in mutant mice and demonstrated that tissue concentrations of the related peptide gastrin were normal. CCK-deficient mice are viable and fertile and exhibit normal body weight. Pancreas weight and cellular morphology appeared normal, although pancreatic amylase content was elevated in CCK-deficient mice. We found that a high-protein diet increased pancreatic weight, protein, DNA, and chymotrypsinogen content similarly in CCK-deficient and wild-type mice. This result demonstrates that CCK is not required for protein-induced pancreatic hypertrophy and increased proteolytic enzyme content. This is a novel finding, since CCK has been considered the primary mediator of dietary protein-induced changes in the pancreas. Altered somatostatin concentrations in brain and duodenum of CCK-deficient mice suggest that other regulatory pathways are modified to compensate for the CCK deficiency.

Effects of intrapancreatic cholinergic activation by electrical field stimulation (EFS) on secretin-stimulated pancreatic exocrine secretion were investigated in the totally isolated perfused rat pancreas. EFS at 15 V, 2 ms, and 8 Hz for 45 min markedly increased spontaneous pancreatic secretion. This increase was completely inhibited by tetrodotoxin (1 microM) but not by hexamethonium (100 microM). Atropine (2 microM) significantly reduced the EFS-evoked volume flow and amylase output by 52% and 80%, respectively. EFS further increased the secretin (12 pM)-stimulated pancreatic secretion of fluid and amylase. The increases of the two parameters were significantly suppressed by atropine by 28% and 72%, respectively. Interestingly, EFS significantly increased concentrations of somatostatin-like immunoreactivity in portal venous effluents. When pertussis toxin (200 ng/ml) or rabbit antisomatostatin serum (0.1 ml/10 ml; titer of 1:50,000) was intra-arterially administered, EFS further increased the secretin-stimulated pancreatic secretion. In conclusion, the activation of intrapancreatic cholinergic neurons potentiated the secretin action on pancreatic exocrine secretion in the rat. This potentiating effect was significantly reduced by local somatostatin released during EFS that activated intrapancreatic cholinergic tone.

The involvement of somatostatin in urethane-anesthesia-evoked suppression of gastric acid secretion has been described. The present study has examined the role of endogenous somatostatin in diminished pancreatic enzyme secretion during anesthesia, while monitoring acid secretion concurrently. Rats were anesthetized with either urethane or sodium pentobarbital. An indwelling catheter was placed into the right jugular vein. The esophagus and the pylorus were ligated, and the stomach was perfused with saline. The common bile duct was ligated at the hepatic hilum, and cannulated at the duodenal end of the duct for collecting pure pancreatic juice. Purified somatostatin monoclonal antibody (CURE.S6) or control antibody (keyhole limpet hemacyanin, KLH) was injected iv in increasing doses (0.05; 0.15; 0.5; and 1.5 mg) every 30 min (n = 6). Gastric acid and pancreatic amylase secretions were measured. The effect of the antibodies on CCK-8-stimulated (0.25-2.50 nmol/kg/h) pancreatic amylase secretion was also tested. During urethane anesthesia somatostatin antibody induced a dose-dependent increase in acid output, while control antibody did not change it. Basal pancreatic amylase secretion was not affected by either somatostatin or by control antibody. Pancreatic secretory responses to high but not to low doses CCK-8 were found to be significantly increased following immunoneutralization of somatostatin. In sodium pentobarbital-anesthetized rats somatostatin antibody stimulated basal acid secretion but did not affect basal pancreatic amylase secretion. Our data indicate that in anesthetized rats endogenous somatostatin mediates suppression of basal gastric acid secretion but not that of basal pancreatic amylase secretion, and this action does not depend on the type of anesthesia. Furthermore, endogenous somatostatin may play a physiological role in modulating stimulated pancreatic enzyme secretion in this species.