Zollinger Ellison syndrome (ZES) is a rare syndrome caused by gastrin hypersecretion from a gastrinoma. Gastrinoma treatment has two goals: the control of acid hypersecretion and the control of tumor growth. While therapy for the syndrome is univocally based on proton pump inhibitors, the one for disease control is still debated. We here aimed at evaluating the role of somatostatin analogs (SSAs) in the control of tumor progression in a series of ZES patients.

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of ZES patients, followed and managed from 1990 to 2019, was performed. The patients' clinical, pathological, treatment, and follow-up data were analyzed. Data regarding SSAs therapy start, dosage, duration, and side effects were collected.

33 patients with ZES were diagnosed. Fourteen patients (42%) had a grade 1 (G1) neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN), five had G2 (15%), none had G3. Fifteen patients (45%) had metastatic disease. Overall, 12 (36%) underwent SSAs therapy. The median treatment duration was 36 months. Eight patients (67%) had a sustained response to SSAs, four (33%) showed an early progression, with a significant difference in terms of PFS between the patients with early and late progression (84 vs 2 months, p = 0.004). No differences in terms of OS and PFS were observed between the treated and non-treated patients, despite the proportion of metastatic patients was greater in the SSAs-treated group (75% vs 29% in the non-treated group, p = 0.01).

Present data support the use of SSAs in ZES, considering that gastrinoma is mainly a well-differentiated low-grade tumor (G1 or G2), with a high expression of somatostatin receptors.

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) associated with pancreatic or duodenal gastrinoma is characterized by gastric acid hypersecretion, which typically leads to gastroesophageal reflux disease, recurrent peptic ulcers, and chronic diarrhea. As symptoms of ZES are nonspecific and overlap with other gastrointestinal disorders, the diagnosis is often delayed with an average time between the onset of symptoms and final diagnosis longer than 5 years. The critical step for the diagnosis of ZES is represented by the initial clinical suspicion. Hypergastrinemia is the hallmark of ZES; however, hypergastrinemia might recognize several causes, which should be ruled out in order to make a final diagnosis. Gastrin levels > 1000 pg/mL and a gastric pH below 2 are considered to be diagnostic for gastrinoma; some specific tests, including esophageal pH-recording and secretin test, might be useful in selected cases, although they are not widely available. Endoscopic ultrasound is very useful for the diagnosis and the local staging of the primary tumor in patients with ZES, particularly in the setting of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Some controversies about the management of these tumors also exist. For the localized stage, the combination of proton pump inhibitory therapy, which usually resolves symptoms, and surgery, whenever feasible, with curative intent represents the hallmark of gastrinoma treatment. The high expression of somatostatin receptors in gastrinomas makes them highly responsive to somatostatin analogs, supporting their use as anti-proliferative agents in patients not amenable to surgical cure. Other medical options for advanced disease are super-imposable to other neuroendocrine neoplasms, and studies specifically focused on gastrinomas only are scant and often limited to case reports or small retrospective series. The multidisciplinary approach remains the cornerstone for the proper management of this composite disease. Herein, we reviewed available literature about gastrinoma-associated ZES with a specific focus on differential diagnosis, providing potential diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are relatively rare neoplasms with 6.4-times increasing age-adjusted annual incidence during the last four decades. NENs arise from neuroendocrine cells, which release hormones in response to neuronal stimuli and they are distributed into organs and tissues. The presentation and biological behaviour of the NENs are highly heterogeneous, depending on the organ. The increased incidence is mainly due to increased awareness and improved detection methods both in the majority of sporadic NENs (non-inherited), but also the inherited groups of neoplasms appearing in at least ten genetic syndromes. The most important one is multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1), caused by mutations in the tumour suppressor gene MEN1. MEN-1 has been associated with different tumour manifestations of NENs e.g. pancreas, gastrointestinal tract, lungs, thymus and pituitary. Pancreatic NENs tend to be less aggressive when arising in the setting of MEN-1 compared to sporadic pancreatic NENs. There have been very important improvements over the past years in both genotyping, genetic counselling and family screening, introduction and validation of various relevant biomarkers, as well as newer imaging modalities. Alongside this development, both medical, surgical and radionuclide treatments have also advanced and improved morbidity, quality of life and mortality in many of these patients. Despite this progress, there is still space for improving insight into the genetic and epigenetic factors in relation to the biological mechanisms determining NENs as part of MEN-1. This review gives a comprehensive update of current evidence for co-occurrence, diagnosis and treatment of MEN-1 and neuroendocrine neoplasms and highlight the important progress now finding its way to international guidelines in order to improve the global management of these patients.

We report here the first case of life-threatening hypomagnesemia in a Zollinger-Ellison syndrome patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) syndrome. The severe symptomatic hypomagnesemia proved to be due to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), but withdrawal of PPIs led to early severe peptic complications despite a substitution by histamine H2-receptor antagonist therapy. Simultaneous management of life-threatening hypomagnesemia, severe gastric acid hypersecretion and MEN1-associated gastrinomas was complex. A total gastrectomy was performed in order to definitely preclude the use of PPIs in this frail patient who was not eligible for curative pancreatoduodenal resection.

About 30% of patients with MEN1 develop a Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Meanwhile it is well established that the causative gastrinomas are almost exclusively localized in the duodenum and not in the pancreas, MEN1 gastrinomas occur multicentric and are associated with hyperplastic gastrin cell lesions and tiny gastrin-producing micro tumors in contrast to sporadic duodenal gastrinomas. Regardless of the high prevalence of early lymphatic metastases, the survival is generally good with an aggressive course of disease in only about 20% of patients. Symptoms can be controlled medically. The indication, timing, type, and extent of surgery are highly controversial and are discussed in detail in this article by a thorough and critical review of literature. More radical procedures, like partial pancreaticoduodenectomy, are weighed against less aggressive local excision of gastrinomas and the pros and cons of both approaches are discussed in terms of long-term morbidity, biochemical cure, and survival.

Neuroendocrine gastro-entero-pancreatic neoplasms (GEP-NENs) constitute a heterogeneous group of tumors, whose incidence has increased over the years. The most frequent site for primary disease is the stomach followed by small and large intestine, and pancreas. In the last decade, a dramatic growing in the incidence of small, incidental GEP-NENs has been recorded. In parallel, an increasing attitude toward more conservative approaches instead of surgical management has being widely spreading. This is particularly true for small, asymptomatic, pancreatic NEN as for these tumor forms an active surveillance has proven to be safe and feasible. Primary site and biological features of the neoplasms lead to different strategies and indications for surveillance and follow-up. This review focuses on the current evidence on modality and timing of surveillance and conservative treatment of incidentally discovered lesions.

Analyze the role of somatostatin analogues (SSAs) in the treatment of sporadic and MEN1-related gastrinomas, trying to define whether recent trials have changed the landscape of gastrinoma therapy.

We evaluate the rationale of SSA use in the treatment of gastrinomas, summarize the current literature concerning the effect of SSAs on the control of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) and gastrinomas tumor progression and discuss their role in the most recent guidelines.

The medical treatment of gastrinoma and related ZES is aimed at controlling acid hypersecretion and tumor progression, in inoperable patients. The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) to control the syndrome is a cornerstone in the ZES therapy. SSAs are not usually indicated for antisecretory purpose, because PPIs are considered the treatment of choice, due to their long lasting high efficacy and oral availability. The antiproliferative effect of SSAs has been established by two placebo-controlled trials that have clearly demonstrated a significant increase in progression free survival in patients affected by non-functioning well-differentiated advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The recent ENETS guidelines recommend the use of SSAs in advanced well differentiated NETs as antiproliferative agents.

The high sstr-expression in gastrinomas make them highly responsive to SSAs and support the use of such drugs to counteract the tumour growth in patients not amenable to surgical cure. Unfortunately, limited data, mainly case reports or small series, support the use of SSAs in advanced gastrinomas, therefore, it is difficult to quantify their ability to control tumour growth and disease progression.

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are increasing in frequency and have a varied spectrum with regard to histology, clinicopathologic background, stage, and prognosis. They are usually discovered incidentally, are for the most part benign and are associated with hypergastrinaemia (secondary either to chronic atrophic gastritis or rarely Zollinger-Ellison syndrome; types 1 and 2, respectively) or more rarely sporadic type 3. Applications of recent staging and grading systems - namely using Ki-67 proliferative indices - (from ENETS and WHO 2010) can be particularly helpful in further categorising these tumours. The natural history of Type 1 gastric carcinoids is generally (>95%) favourable and simple surveillance is usually recommended for small (<1 cm) T1 tumours, with local (endoscopic or surgical) resection for larger lesions. Other potential therapies such as somatostatin analogues and gastrin receptor antagonists may offer newer therapeutic possibilities. Rarely, gastric NENs have a malignant course and this is usually confined to Type 2 and especially Type 3 tumours; the latter mimic the biological course of gastric adenocarcinoma and require radical oncological therapies. Most duodenal NENs, apart from gastrinomas (that are not dealt with here) are sporadic and non functional. They are also increasing in frequency probably due to incidental discovery at endoscopy or imaging for other reasons and this may account for their overall good prognosis. Peri-ampullary and ampullary NENs may have a more aggressive outcome and should be carefully appraised and treated (often with surgical resection).

In the present paper the increasing difficulty of diagnosis of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) due to issues raised in two recent papers is discussed. These issues involve the difficulty and need to withdraw patients suspected of ZES from treatment with Proton Pump Inhibitors (omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole) and the unreliability of many gastrin radioimmunoassays. The clinical context of each of these important issues is reviewed and the conclusions in these articles commented from the perspective of clinical management.

Cushing's syndrome and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome occur occasionally as a result of neuroendocrine cancers. The concurrence of the two syndromes has been considered to confer a poor clinical and therapeutic outcome. In this study, we are reviewing two patients with pancreatic islet cell carcinomas and with both Zollinger-Ellison and Cushing's syndromes, one followed up for more than 5 years, and the other still receiving therapy, 5 years since diagnosis. A literature review showed that surgery has limited utility as the majority of these patients had metastases at the time of diagnosis. Proton-pump inhibitors, ketoconazole, and somatostatin antagonists have a major role in controlling symptoms. Interferon and systemic chemotherapeutic agents play a role in the management of metastatic and fast-growing cases. Chemoembolization and bland embolization show encouraging results in controlling liver metastases. The latter was used effectively and more than once in the two patients presented herein. On the basis of recent molecular genetics studies, target therapy may be helpful, however, ongoing trials will define it's utility. As the data confers a worse prognosis versus other pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, the relatively favorable outcome of the two patients reported herein may reflect the impact of multiple therapeutic modalities.

Gastrinomas are functional neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system. Surgery is first line treatment in gastrinomas, however often fails to be curative. This manuscript reviews current strategies of medical treatment of surgically non-curable gastrinoma. Symptomatic treatment with H(+)-K(+)-ATPase proton-pump inhibitors suppresses hypersecretion of gastric acid and substantially improves quality of life in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Further medical therapy is only recommended in cases of progressive metastatic gastrinoma. In well differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (G1 and G2) a so-called biotherapy with somatostatin analogues exists as first-line and chemotherapy with streptocotozin plus doxorubicine/5-FU as second-line medical treatment option. In poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (G3) chemotherapy with etoposide plus cisplatin is possible. Prospective future therapeutic strategies may include treatment with novel somatostatin analogues as well as angiogenesis inhibitors and kinase inhibitors targeting tumor-specific signaling cascades.

This review gives an introduction to the classification and staging of neuroendocrine tumors, as the prognostic implications of these classifications influence therapeutic decisions. The indications for biotherapy are given, together with a short update on the mechanism of somatostatin analogs and interferon-alpha therapy. This is followed by an in-depth description of the use of biotherapy, its results with respect to symptomatic and antiproliferative treatment, as well as its side-effects.

The assessment of fasting serum gastrin (FSG) is essential for the diagnosis and management of patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES). Although many studies have analyzed FSG levels in patients with gastrinoma, limited information has resulted from these studies because of their small size, different methodologies, and lack of correlations of FSG levels with clinical, laboratory, or tumor features in ZES patients. To address this issue, we report the results of a prospective National Institutes of Health (NIH) study of 309 patients with ZES and compare our results with those of 2229 ZES patients in 513 small series and case reports in the literature. In the NIH and literature ZES patients, normal FSG values were uncommon (0.3%-3%), as were very high FSG levels >100-fold normal (4.9%-9%). Two-thirds of gastrinoma patients had FSG values <10-fold normal that overlap with gastrin levels seen in more common conditions, like Helicobacter pylori infection or antral G-cell hyperplasia/hyperfunction. In these patients, FSG levels are not diagnostic of ZES, and gastrin provocative tests are needed to establish the diagnosis. Most clinical variables (multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 status, presence or absence of the most common symptoms, prior medical treatment) are not correlated with FSG levels, while a good correlation of FSG values was found with other clinical features (prior gastric surgery, diarrhea, duration from onset to diagnosis). Increasing basal acid output, but not maximal acid output correlated closely with increasing FSG. Numerous tumoral features correlated with the magnitude of FSG in our study, including tumor location (pancreatic > duodenal), primary size (larger > smaller) and extent (liver metastases > local disease). In conclusion, this detailed analysis of FSG in a large number of patients with ZES allowed us to identify important clinical guidelines that should contribute to improved diagnosis and management of patients with ZES.

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome is characterised by refractory peptic ulcer disease, severe diarrhoea and gastric acid hypersecretion associated with an islet-cell tumour of the pancreas (gastrinoma). The true incidence and prevalence of this rare disease is unknown; in the US, the frequency is one per one million people and the age at presentation varies from 7 to 90 years. Zollinger-Ellison syndrome is sporadic in 62-80% of cases and in 20-38% of cases is associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1). The diagnosis of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome is certain when the plasma gastrin is >1000 pg/mL and the basal acid output is >15 mEq/h in patients with an intact stomach, >5 mEq/h in gastrectomised patients, or when this hypergastrinemia is associated with a pH <2. The treatment is based on control of gastric acid hypersecretion and of the malignant tumour and its possible metastases. Proton pump inhibitors are the most effective antisecretory drugs and can be administered in the elderly at high dosages without drug-related adverse effects. As an initial therapy, daily dosages of omeprazole 80-100 mg or pantoprazole 40-160 mg are employed. In long-term treatment the doses can be greatly reduced once effective control of the gastric output has been established. Intravenous proton pump inhibitors may be administered when patients cannot take oral therapy, particularly in acute conditions. All sporadic localised gastrinomas should be excised if possible. When liver metastases are also present, their debulking may improve symptoms and survival, and facilitate medical treatment. There is some controversy as to the surgical approach for gastrinomas associated with MEN 1. Somatostatin analogues can be useful in reducing gastric acid hypersecretion, serum gastrin and gastric enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells and can thus contribute to treating the disease more effectively. Their antiproliferative effect can be used in treating liver metastases. Chemotherapy is not the therapy of choice in patients with gastrinomas and is indicated only in those with malignant progressive disease; interferon alpha, embolisation and chemoembolisation are not advisable for the elderly. The treatment of elderly Zollinger-Ellison syndrome patients, similarly to all elderly oncological patients, should be based on the use of comprehensive geriatric assessment. This will enable the clinician to define the functional status of the elderly person, to decide whether the patient can tolerate surgery and/or the stress of antineoplastic therapy, and finally, to determine whether this patient can tolerate an aggressive treatment for Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or whether the only possible choice is palliative relief of symptoms.

With the introduction of longer-acting somatostatin analogues symptomatic relief is easy to achieve in patients with functionally active endocrine tumours and will be further facilitated by still longer-acting formulations. The consequences of gastric acid hypersecretion in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome can be prevented by all proton-pump inhibitors currently on the market. Despite the various antiproliferative strategies that have been offered to patients with metastatic disease, available data are controversial and, more importantly, are supported by few prospective and controlled studies. Most experts agree that surgery with curative extirpation of the primary in the absence of metastases and tumour debulking in metastatic disease should be intended wherever possible. Controversy concerns residual disease. According to our view, any further antiproliferative strategy should consider the growth characteristics and biology of a given tumour (Figure 4). In the case of rapid progression, chemotherapy should be offered if tumours originate from the pancreas or reveal an undifferentiated histology. In contrast, chemotherapy should not be offered to patients with well-differentiated non-functional or functional tumours (carcinoid syndrome) arising from the intestine. The same applies for patients with tumours with no or only slow growth within an given observation period of 3-12 months. These patients should be treated only symptomatically. Patients with tumours of slow progression might favourably respond to long-acting somatostatin analogues. We start with octreotide and offer patients not responding to octreotide monotherapy additional IFN alpha. If further tumour progression takes place, hepatic artery embolization is the next step (Figure 5) followed by chemotherapy, the latter in patients with tumours of pancreatic origin only. This strategy recognizes the severity of side-effects of the different therapeutic modalities and starts with octreotide because of its very few side-effects. Other groups start with chemoembolization followed by octreotide, alpha-interferon or its combinations (Ahlman et al, 1996). Ongoing studies will, it is hoped, answer the question of the ideal sequence of therapeutic strategies. Every available patient with metastasised gastrointestinal endocrine tumours should be included in one of the ongoing European multicentre trials.

We assessed the effects of pirenzepine (2 mg/kg per os) on gastric secretion and gastrin and histamine release in response to food and histamine dihydrochloride infusion in four dogs during 24 weeks of treatment and for 15 weeks after the end of treatment. The results were compared to those obtained in the same animals in control experiments, before treatment, and in four untreated dogs. Pirenzepine absorption was checked by measuring plasma concentrations. Pirenzepine led to a significant reduction in acid and pepsin secretion in response to histamine. In response to food, the reduction in secretion was concomitant with a reduction in gastrin and histamine release. Baseline concentrations of gastrin were reduced, while those of histamine were unchanged. No side effects were observed. After treatment, a long time lapse (about 15 weeks) was required for acid and pepsin secretion and gastrinemia to return to control levels, while histamine release in response to food normalized rapidly. Pirenzepine fixes selectively to M1 muscarinic receptors of the synaptic ganglion, thus inhibiting the effect of vagal stimulation, especially on pepsin secretion. Our data suggest that it might also fix to M1 receptors located on ECL cells, thereby reducing histamine release. In addition, pirenzepine probably fixes to other muscarinic receptors inhibiting gastrin release and resulting in a G and secretory cell mass reduction, probably by increasing somatostatin release.

The effects of three months of treatment with octreotide on gastric acid hypersecretion induced by hypergastrinaemia were investigated in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (n = 5) or antral G-cell hyperfunction (n = 4). Gastric acid secretion, fasting plasma gastrin concentrations and clinical findings were examined, and a morphometrical analysis of oxyntic endocrine cells was performed.

Administration of octreotide 100 mcg b.d. subcutaneously significantly decreased the volume density of argyrophil cells (P < 0.05) as well as basal and pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion (P < 0.05). Although partial or complete loss of inhibition was found in most patients after 3 months, gastrin levels were decreased during the first 2 months of treatment (P < 0.05). Fundic D-cells were not affected by treatment. Positive correlations were observed between volume density of argyrophil cells and basal acid output (r = 0.65); plasma gastrin and basal acid output (r = 0.74); plasma gastrin concentrations and volume density of argyrophil cells (r = 0.80).

These results support the important role of the enterochromaffin-like cell in maintaining acid secretion, and indicate a specific role for octreotide in the therapy of gastric acid hypersecretion associated with hypergastrinaemic diseases.

This study reports the effects of 4 and 5-year treatment with octreotide (200 micrograms sc bid) in the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES). No symptoms related to acid hypersecretion were observed in the four patients throughout the study, and upper GI endoscopy was normal. Basal acid output (BAO) measured 12 h after injection, was below 10 mmol h-1 in three to four patients and previous ranitidine treatment was discontinued. In the fourth case (pretreatment BAO value: 115 mmol h-1), BAO progressively decreased to 42 mmol h-1 after 5 years of octreotide treatment. At the end of the study, serum gastrin levels were 58.5% (30-68) of the pretreatment values and two patients had normal gastrin levels. Peak acid output (PAO) decreased markedly after 2, 4 and 5 years, by 68% (35-89) suggesting that octreotide had exerted an antitrophic effect on parietal cell mass. Diffuse hyperplasia of fundic argyrophil cells present in two patients before octreotide, decreased during the treatment. Mean argyrophil cell density for all patients was not significantly modified. Antral gastrin-cell density was in the normal range. No long-term side effect of octreotide treatment was observed. Although octreotide may not be considered as a substitute for benzimidazoles in the treatment of ZES, its specific properties may be of therapeutic benefit in some ZES patients.

Single subcutaneous doses of the somatostatin analogue, SMS 201-995, were evaluated for the degree and duration of effects on acid secretion, serum gastrin levels, and gastric emptying in eight human male subjects (mean age 44 years) over an 8-h period. All the subjects received subcutaneous 50-micrograms and 100-micrograms doses of SMS 201-995 and placebo on three separate days in a double-blind random order. Drug or placebo was administered at time 0 followed by peptone meals at time 0, 2, 4, and 6-h. Peptone meals were evacuated at time 1, 3, 5 and 7-h to create 'basal' conditions between alternate hours. Gastric acid secretion was determined hourly beginning at time--1. Both the 50-micrograms and 100-micrograms doses of SMS 201-995 significantly inhibited 'basal' and peptone meal-stimulated gastric acid secretion throughout the 8-h measurement period. The minimum effective plasma concentration of SMS 201-995 for inhibition of peptone meal-stimulated gastric acid secretion was approximately 1000 pg/ml. Peptone meal-stimulated plasma gastrin concentrations were inhibited for 5 and 7 h after 50-micrograms and 100-micrograms doses of SMS 201-995, respectively, whereas 'basal' plasma gastrins were inhibited for 4 and 6 h, respectively. Gastric emptying determined by marker dilution was not significantly enhanced compared to placebo. These results indicate prolonged and potent effects of single subcutaneous doses of SMS 201-995 on peptone-meal stimulated acid secretion and gastrin release.

Octreotide is an analogue of somatostatin. Like endogenous somatostatin, it exerts a potent inhibitory effect on the release of anterior pituitary growth hormone and thyroid-stimulating hormone, and peptides of the gastroenteropancreatic endocrine system, while overcoming some of the shortcomings of exogenously administered somatostatin, namely a short duration of action, a need for intravenous administration and postinfusion rebound hypersecretion of hormone. Clinical studies have shown that octreotide is effective in the treatment of acromegaly and thyrotrophinomas. In comparative trials octreotide was significantly superior to bromocriptine in patients with acromegaly. Octreotide also appears to provide a significant advantage over existing therapies in the management of the carcinoid syndrome and offers considerable therapeutic potential in reversing carcinoid crises which may be life-threatening. Trials in patients with tumours producing vasoactive intestinal peptide demonstrated that octreotide may be an effective first-line choice for this condition, which has usually metastasised and become refractory to traditional symptomatic therapy. In limited studies in patients with high-output secretory diarrhoea, including cryptosporidium-related diarrhoea associated with AIDS and in patients with small bowel fistulas, octreotide has been shown to be effective in reducing stool/fistula output. However, well-designed clinical trials are still required to confirm its long term usefulness in these disorders. Similarly, although the use of octreotide in other conditions such as neonatal hypoglycaemia caused by nesidioblastosis, reactive pancreatitis, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, postprandial hypotension and the dumping syndrome has provided encouraging preliminary results, more studies are needed to clarify the place of octreotide in their treatment. Overall, octreotide appears to be well tolerated with the most frequently reported reactions being pain at the site of injection and gastrointestinal symptoms such as abdominal cramps, nausea, bloating, flatulence, diarrhoea and steatorrhoea. These adverse effects usually abate with time. Additionally, octreotide, like endogenous somatostatin, may also result in cholelithiasis, presumably by altering fat absorption and possibly by decreasing motility of the gallbladder. Thus, octreotide represents a new departure from traditional therapies in the treatment of various pathophysiological states associated with excessive peptide production and secretion. It offers a significant advantage over existing therapies in the medical management of patients with acromegaly, thyrotrophinomas, the carcinoid syndrome, tumours producing vasoactive intestinal peptide and severe secretory diarrhoea in whom conventional management options have either become exhausted or have provided suboptimal symptomatic relief.

Antisecretory drugs are major tools for management of the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES). Cimetidine was first used as a successful substitute of total gastrectomy. However with high dosage side effects and an escape from control were observed. As a more potent H2-receptor antagonist ranitidine has obvious advantages and is still largely used. Famotidine is more promising with a longer duration of action and given at lower dosages. Omeprazole could be considered as a treatment of choice with specific action on the proton pump and no side effects. However, with this drug the danger of permanent hypergastrinaemia being associated with fundic carcinoïd induction should be appreciated. Long-acting somatostatin has theoretical advantages in reducing simultaneously acid and gastrin secretion with a potential antitrophic effect. Larger studies are needed to precisely assess the therapeutic potential of the last three drugs.