Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major health problem recognized globally. HCV is a common cause of liver fibrosis that may lead to liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of HCV infection and genotyping among Egyptian and Saudi Arabian chronic patients using different molecular techniques. HCV RNA viral load was assessed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technology. For HCV genotyping, RT-PCR hybridization fluorescence-based method and reverse hybridization line probe assay (INNO-LiPA) were used. A total of 40 anti-HCV-positive patients with chronic hepatitis C were examined for HCV RNA, genotyping, and different laboratory investigations. In the present study, HCV genotypes 4, mixed 4.1b, and 1 were detected in patients of both countries, while genotype 2 was only detected in Saudi Arabian patients. Genotyping methods for HCV showed no difference in the classification at the genotype level. With regard to HCV subtypes, INNO-LiPA assay was a reliable test in HCV genotyping for the detection of major genotypes and subtypes, while RT-PCR-based assay was a good test at the genotype level only. HCV genotype 4 was found to be the predominant genotype among Egyptian and Saudi Arabian chronic patients. In conclusion, data analysis for detecting and genotyping HCV was an important factor for understanding the epidemiology and treatment strategies of HCV among Egyptian and Saudi Arabian chronic patients.

The extent of mixed hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype in different compartments (plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cell, PBMC) and possible association with treatment efficacy in HIV/HCV coinfected patients remains to be unknown.The objective of this study was to elucidate the frequency of mixed genotype infection (MG), its profile in different compartments during anti-HCV treatment, and the possible influence of different genotypes on the response rate.The compartmentalization of HCV population was investigated by next-generation sequencing in 19 HIV/HCV coinfected patients under anti-HCV treatment with peginterferon/ribavirin (P-R). Ten individuals were nonresponder (NR) or relapser (RE) to P-R treatment and 9 had a sustained virological response (SVR).Eleven/nineteen (58%) patients had MG in plasma compartment. Ten or 12 patients infected by a difficult to treat genotype (DTG) 1 or 4 as dominant strain, had an MG, whereas only 1/7 individuals infected by easy to treat genotype (ETG) harbored a mixed genotype, P = 0.006. HCV-RNA was more frequently detected in PBMC of NR (10/10) than in those of SVR (5/9), P = 0.032. Mixed genotype infection was detected in 6/15 (40%) PBMC-positive cases and was not associated with P-R treatment response. By multivariate analysis, MG in plasma samples was the most important viral factor affecting the treatment response (P = 0.0237).Detection of MG in plasma of HIV/HCV coinfected patients seems to represent the major determinant of response to P-R treatment. This finding may have important clinical implication in light of the new therapeutic approach in HIV/HCV coinfected individuals suggesting that combination treatment with direct acting antivirals could be less effective in MG.

The genotype of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an important indicator for antiviral therapeutic response. We hereby described development of a rapid HCV genotyping approach that enabled the identification of the six most common HCV subtypes of Asia, i.e., 1a, 1b, 2a, 3a, 3b, and 6a, in a single reaction. Using two dual-labeled, self-quenched probes that target the core region of the HCV genome, the exact subtype could be accurately identified by two-melting temperature codes determined from the two respective probes in a real-time PCR assay. Analytical sensitivity studies using armored RNA samples representing each of the six HCV subtypes showed that 5 copies/reaction of HCV RNA could be detected. The assay was evaluated using 244 HCV-positive serum samples and the results were compared with sequencing analysis. Of the 224 samples, subtype 3a (127, 52.3%) was the dominant, followed by 1b (51, 20.9%), 3b (47, 19.3%), 2a (8, 3.3%), 6a (4, 1.6%) and the least was subtype 1a (1, 0.4%). Moreover, 6 (2.5%) mixed infection samples were also detected. These results were fully concordant with sequencing analysis. We concluded that this real-time PCR-based assay could provide a rapid and reliable tool for routine HCV genotyping in most Asian countries.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping is required for tailoring the dose and duration of antiviral therapy, predicting virological response rates, and selecting future treatment options.

To establish whether baseline genotypes, performed by INNO-LiPA Version 1.0 (v1.0), before 2008, were valid for making treatment decisions now or whether genotypic determination should be repeated. Furthermore, to evaluate concordance between Abbott RealTime genotype II assay (RT) and genotyping by sequencing HCV C/E1, NS5A, NS5B.

Genotyping by RT and sequencing was performed on paired historic and current specimens from 50 patients previously baseline genotyped using INNO-LiPA.

Of 100 samples from 50 patients, ≥ 2 of HCV genomic target regions yielded a sequence that was suitable for genotyping, with 100% concordance, providing no evidence of recombination events. Genotype and subtype prediction based on RT and sequencing agreed in 62.8% historic and 72.7% current specimens, with a kappa coefficient score of 0.48 and 0.76, respectively. LiPA could not subtype 46% of HCV gt1 infections, and LiPA subgenotype was only in agreement with RT and sequencing in 28.6% cases, where matched baseline and historic specimens were available. Three patients were indeterminate by RT, and five patients with HCV gt1 infections could not be subtyped by RT. However, RT revealed mixed infections in five patients where sequencing detected only single HCV infection at 20% threshold.

Genotyping by sequencing, exhibited excellent concordance, with moderate to good agreement with RT, and could resolve RT indeterminates and subtype HCV-gt1 infections not possible by LiPA.

In patients with chronic hepatitis C, the hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA level is an important predictor of treatment response. To explore the relationship of HCV RNA with viral and demographic factors, as well as IL28B genotype, we examined viral levels in an ethnically diverse group of injection drug users (IDUs). Between 1998 and 2000, the Urban Health Study (UHS) recruited IDUs from street settings in San Francisco Bay area neighborhoods. Participants who were positive by HCV enzyme immunoassay were tested for HCV viremia by a branched-chain DNA assay. HCV genotype was determined by sequencing the HCV nonstructural 5B protein region. For a subset of participants, IL28B rs12979860 genotype was determined by Taqman. Among 1,701 participants with HCV viremia, median age was 46 years and median duration of injection drug use was 26 years; 56.0% were African American and 34.0% were of European ancestry (non-Hispanic). Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) prevalence was 13.9%. The overall median HCV RNA level was 6.45 log(10) copies/mL. In unadjusted analyses, higher levels were found with older age, male gender, African-American ancestry, hepatitis B virus infection, HIV-1 infection, and IL28B rs12979860-CC genotype; compared to participants infected with HCV genotype 1, HCV RNA was lower in participants with genotypes 3 or 4. In an adjusted analysis, age, gender, racial ancestry, HIV-1 infection, HCV genotype, and IL28B rs12979860 genotype were all independently associated with HCV RNA.

The level of HCV viremia is influenced by a large number of demographic, viral, and human genetic factors.

To evaluate the clinical applicability of an eligible assay for the true prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) mixed-genotype infections.

A newly developed HCV genotyping method targeting all six major HCV genotypes and 12 subtypes, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and a serotyping assay were utilized for the detection of HCV mixed-genotype infections using known HCV genotypes and unknown samples.

In a defined mix of HCV genotypes, a genotype present at levels as low as 8.3% was detected by our newly developed assay, showing a threefold increase in sensitivity over that of direct deoxyribonucleic (DNA) sequencing. A comparative study of the accuracy among the three genotyping methods was carried out on samples obtained from 50 thalassemic patients who received multiple blood transfusions. The results showed that viruses in approximately 42% of the samples from this group were determined to be infected with mixed genotypes by our newly developed method. A serotyping assay and RFLP analysis, performed with poor results, could identify only 18% and 10% of mixed-genotype infections, respectively.

The newly developed assay may be the method of choice when detection of genotypes present at low levels in mixed-genotype infections due to its higher level of sensitivity.

Limited information is available about genotypes of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in intravenous heroin users in Taiwan. The purpose of this study was to examine the concordance of the detection of antibody to HCV and HCV-RNA and to determine the distribution of HCV genotypes in male intravenous heroin users.

This was a cross-sectional study. The study population included 274 intravenous heroin drug users newly sentenced in a male prison in central Taiwan from November 2004 to February 2005, whose antibodies to HCV were positive, and antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus were negative. The mean age was 33.9 years (standard deviation, 7.8). The molecular diagnosis used to identify HCV-RNA was PCR.

Among 274 subjects, 214 subjects were found to contain HCV-RNA. Positive predictive value of HCV infection using antibody to HCV as an indicator was 78.1%. Among 214 subjects, HCV genotype 2a was the most predominant (58.9%, n = 126), followed by 1a (17.3%, n = 37), 1b (14.5%, n = 31), 2b (8.9%, n = 19) and 1a + 2b (0.4%, n = 1). Age-specific analysis also showed genotype 2a was the most prominent genotype among the 4 age groups, with the highest prevalence in groups aged 20 to 29 years and 30 to 39 years (53.3% and 67.6%, respectively).

The concordance of antibody to HCV and HCV-RNA is remarkable in selected high-risk groups. HCV genotype 2a is the most prevalent in male intravenous heroin users in central Taiwan, especially in aged 20 to 29 years and aged 30 to 39 years.

International standardization and coordination of the nomenclature of variants of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is increasingly needed as more is discovered about the scale of HCV-related liver disease and important biological and antigenic differences that exist between variants. Consistency in numbering is also increasingly required for functional and clinical studies of HCV. For example, an unambiguous method for referring to amino acid substitutions at specific positions in NS3 and NS5B coding sequences associated with resistance to specific HCV inhibitors is essential in the investigation of antiviral treatment. Inconsistent and inaccurate numbering of locations in DNA and protein sequences is becoming a problem in the HCV scientific literature.A group of experts in the field of HCV genetic variability, and those involved in development of HCV sequence databases, the Hepatitis Virus Database (Japan), euHCVdb (France), and the Los Alamos National Laboratory (United States), convened to reexamine the status of HCV genotype nomenclature, resolve conflicting genotype or subtype names among described variants of HCV, and draw up revised criteria for the assignment of new genotypes as they are discovered in the future. They also discussed how HCV sequence databases could introduce and facilitate a standardized numbering system for HCV nucleotides, proteins, and epitopes.A comprehensive listing of all currently classified variants of HCV incorporates a number of agreed genotype and subtype name reassignments to create consistency in nomenclature. A consensus proposal was drawn up for the classification of new variants into genotypes and subtypes, which recognizes and incorporates new knowledge of HCV genetic diversity and epidemiology. The proposed numbering system was adapted from the Los Alamos HIV database, with elements from the hepatitis B virus numbering system. The system comprises both nucleotides and amino acid sequences and epitopes, and uses the full-length genome sequence of isolate H77 (accession number AF009606) as a reference. It includes a method for numbering insertions and deletions relative to this reference sequence.

A structured literature review was performed to detail the frequency and etiology of chronic liver disease (CLD) in Aboriginal North Americans. CLD affects Aboriginal North Americans disproportionately and is now one of the most common causes of death. Alcoholic liver disease is the leading etiology of CLD, but viral hepatitis, particularly hepatitis C, is an important and growing cause of CLD. High rates of autoimmune hepatitis and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) are reported in regions of coastal British Columbia and southeastern Alaska. Non-alcoholic liver disease is a common, but understudied, cause of CLD. Future research should monitor the incidence and etiology of CLD and should be geographically inclusive. In addition, more research is needed on the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in this population.

The frequency that multiple different subtypes of hepatitis C virus (HCV) simultaneously infect a given individual is controversial. To address this question, heteroduplex mobility analysis (HMA) of portions of the HCV core and envelope 1 region was optimized for sensitive and specific detection of mixtures of HCV genomes of different genotype or subtype. Using the standard HCV genotyping approach of 5'-untranslated region (UTR) analysis, 28 of 374 (7.5%) chronic hepatitis C research subjects were classified as having either multiple-subtype HCV infections (n = 21) or switching HCV subtypes over time (n = 7), the latter pattern implying viral superinfection. Upon retesting of specimens by HMA, 25 of 28 multiple-subtype results could not be reproduced. All three patients with positive results were injection drug users with potential multiple HCV exposures. To address the hypothesis of tissue sequestration of multiple-subtype HCV infections, liver (n = 22), peripheral blood mononuclear cell (n = 13), perihepatic lymph node (n = 16), and serum (n = 19) specimens from 23 subjects with end-stage hepatitis C were collected and analyzed by the HMA technique. Whereas 5'-UTR results implicated mixed-subtype HCV infections in 2 subjects, HMA testing revealed no evidence of a second HCV subtype in any tissue compartment (0 of 70 compartments [0%]) or within any given subject (0 of 23 subjects [0%]). In summary, a large proportion of mixed-genotype and switching-genotype patterns generated by 5'-UTR analysis were not reproducible using the HMA approach, emphasizing the need for additional study.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) isolates have been classified into six main genotypes. Genotyping methods, and especially the widely used line probe assay (LiPA), are frequently based on the 5'-untranslated region (5'UTR). However, this region is not appropriate for discriminating HCV strains at the subtype level and for distinguishing many genotype 6 samples from genotype 1. We investigated the capacity of a novel LiPA (Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 assay) based on the simultaneous detection of 5'UTR and Core regions for genotypes 1 and 6 to provide correct HCV genotypes (characterized with a phylogenetic analysis) in a set of HCV strains mainly encountered in Western countries. The improvement was assessed by comparing the results to those obtained with the previous version of the assay. Of the 135 tested samples, 64.7% were concordant for genotype group and subtype with sequencing reference results using the Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 assay versus 37.5% with the previous version. The yield was mainly related to a better characterization of genotype 1, since the accuracy, tested in 62 genotype 1 samples, increased from 45.2% with the first version to 96.8% with the new one. However, this new version necessitates a specific PCR and could no longer be used after 5'UTR PCR used for current HCV infection diagnosis. Moreover, the information provided by 5'UTR hybridization is not reliable for correctly identifying the diversity within genotypes 2 and 4. Thus, the Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 assay remains a useful tool for clinical practice when only the discrimination between major HCV genotypes is necessary.

Hepatitis C virus is an RNA virus that is associated with chronic infection in the majority of people infected. Chronic infection with hepatitis C virus is the cause of significant morbidity and mortality worldwide and is associated with a large spectrum of liver disease including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. End-stage liver disease due to chronic hepatitis C virus infection is currently the leading indication for liver transplantation in the USA. Hepatitis C virus genotyping of viral isolates circulating in the blood during chronic infection has become an important part of hepatitis C virus monitoring in chronically infected patients, and is useful as a prognostic indicator and to direct duration of therapy. This review will summarize information on hepatitis C genotyping, describe the limitations of current commercially available methods, give information on more recently developed methods, and provide a look to the future in terms of where advances in hepatitis C virus genotyping assays need to be made.

The role of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still controversial. To determine the distribution and clinical implications of HCV genotypes in southern Taiwan, we analysed 418 patients with chronic HCV infections. HCV genotypes were determined using an HCV Line Probe Assay. The predominant HCV genotype was 1b (45.5%), followed by 2a/2c (30.9%) and 2b (6.9%). The prevalence of genotype 1b in HCC patients (60.3%) was significantly higher than in those with liver cirrhosis (38.7%) and chronic hepatitis (38.7%) (P=0.003 and P<0.001, respectively). Patients with chronic HCV 2a/2c infection had higher alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels than those with chronic HCV 1b infection (P<0.001). Univariate analysis revealed that disease severity was significantly correlated with older age, genotype 1b, lower ALT levels and lower viral load. Based on multiple logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for age and serum HCV RNA levels, HCV 1b infection was still a significant risk factor for HCC. In conclusion, the predominant genotypes in southern Taiwan were 1b and 2a/2c, and disease severity was associated with genotype 1b.

Genotype of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is of major importance for the outcome of treatment. The response rate is considerably lower for genotype 1, the predominant genotype in western countries.

To develop and evaluate a new, simple method for genotyping of HCV based on real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Taqman probes targeting the 5' non-coding region.

The method was compared with Innolipa on 220 serum samples representing genotypes 1-4, and was applied on a further 614 clinical samples.

Taqman typing of the 220 samples showed genotype 1 in 69, genotype 2 in 58, genotype 3 in 57 and genotype 4 in 19, while 17 were non-reactive. There was a complete concordance with Innolipa with the exception of seven samples, which were of genotype 1 by Taqman, but genotype 4 by Innolipa. Sequencing of these samples showed a subtype 4 variant which differed at two positions compared with subtypes 4b/c/d, which are targeted by the probe. By adding a modified probe, these genotype 4 variants could also be identified. Out of 614 consecutive clinical samples, 524 could be typed by the Taqman assay; 45.2% were genotype 1, 19.3% genotype 2, 33.8% genotype 3 and 1.7%, genotype 4.

The method was overall accurate and provides an attractive alternative for genotyping because processing time and costs are significantly reduced. Inclusion of probes targeting genotypes 5 and 6 is required for the method to be useful in areas where these genotypes are present.

International standardization and coordination of the nomenclature of variants of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is increasingly needed as more is discovered about the scale of HCV-related liver disease and important biological and antigenic differences that exist between variants. A group of scientists expert in the field of HCV genetic variability, and those involved in development of HCV sequence databases, the Hepatitis Virus Database (Japan), euHCVdb (France), and Los Alamos (United States), met to re-examine the status of HCV genotype nomenclature, resolve conflicting genotype or subtype names among described variants of HCV, and draw up revised criteria for the assignment of new genotypes as they are discovered in the future. A comprehensive listing of all currently classified variants of HCV incorporates a number of agreed genotype and subtype name re-assignments to create consistency in nomenclature. The paper also contains consensus proposals for the classification of new variants into genotypes and subtypes, which recognizes and incorporates new knowledge of HCV genetic diversity and epidemiology. A proposal was made that HCV variants be classified into 6 genotypes (representing the 6 genetic groups defined by phylogenetic analysis). Subtype name assignment will be either confirmed or provisional, depending on the availability of complete or partial nucleotide sequence data, or remain unassigned where fewer than 3 examples of a new subtype have been described. In conclusion, these proposals provide the framework by which the HCV databases store and provide access to data on HCV, which will internationally coordinate the assignment of new genotypes and subtypes in the future.

Molecular diagnostics plays an important role in the diagnosis and clinical management of a wide array of infectious diseases.

Advances in molecular technology and methods of detecting nucleic acid sequences have revolutionized the field of virology. These developments are reflected by the rapid diagnosis and monitoring of viral agents as well as assessment of clinical disease associated with viral infections. In addition to many commercially available molecular based assays, many laboratories offer in-house developed assays for a variety of viral targets. The introduction of real-time PCR technology has made a large impact on virology testing.

The role of real-time PCR for the diagnosis of viral infections is enhanced by the accuracy, rapidity and ability to quantitate viral target sequences.

The rate of spontaneous HCV viral clearance is reported as 20-25% but recent data indicate a higher frequency in some cohorts. The rate of spontaneous clearance in intravenous drug users has not been reported in an Irish setting.

To determine the rate of spontaneous hepatitis C viral clearance and genotype in an Irish intravenous drug-using cohort.

Drug users attending five drug treatment clinics in the Dublin were investigated. Data were prospectively recorded from January 1997 to June 2001 and follow-up testing completed in 2003. There were 496 HCV antibody positive patients identified and assessed for HCV RNA clearance. All were HIV and hepatitis B negative, 68.8% were male.

HCV RNA negativity (viral clearance) was documented in 38% of patients. Viral clearance was 47.4% in females and 34.5% in males (p = 000.6). Clearance was independent of age or duration of intravenous drug use. Viral clearance as defined as two negative consecutive HCV RNA tests, a minimum of one year apart, was sustained in 82.2% at two-year follow-up, giving an overall viral clearance of 31.1%. HCV genotype 1 and 3 were most commonly identified at 48.8% and 48.5% respectively in those with chronic infection.

Spontaneous HCV viral clearance occurs at a higher frequency than previously reported. Genotype 1 and 3 are commonest in the patient cohort.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) strains isolated from 68 haemodialysis Tunisian patients exhibiting chronic infection were genotyped targeting the NS5b region of the HCV genome using a prototype assay developed by Bayer HealthCare-Diagnostics (TRUGENE NS5b HCV). The overall results were compared to those obtained with another assay of the same company based on sequencing of the 5' non-coding region (TRUGENE HCV 5'NC genotyping kit). All strains could be typed by the 5'NC typing kit, but only 62 (91; 2%) by the NS5b prototype assay. All the 62 strains typed by both methods exhibited the same pattern at the type level: 57 were type 1, 3 were type 2, and 2 were type 4. At the subtype level, eight strains that gave undetermined results by the 5'NC kit were successfully typed by the NS5b kit; eight additional strains exhibited discrepant results. The overall agreement between the two assays was 74.2% at the subtype level. In conclusion, the NS5b region appears to be much more accurate than the 5'NC region to subtype HCV strains, especially in those isolated from patients attending haemodialysis centres where the subtype distribution suggests frequent nosocomial transmissions.

The efficacy and secondary effects of an induction dose of interferon-alpha2b (IFN-alpha2b) with ribavirin compared with standard combined treatment in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C infection were compared. A prospective study was undertaken between March 1998 and November 2001 in which 84 Spanish hospitals took part. Six hundred and fourteen naive patients (age range 18-65 years) diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and without cirrhosis or co-infection by other viruses, were included. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A (n = 304) received induction treatment with a daily dose of 5 MU of IFN-alpha2b for 4 weeks, followed by 5 MU three times a week with ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day, according to weight) until completing 1 year of treatment. Group B (n = 310) received the standard dose of IFN-alpha2b of 3 MU three times per week for 48 weeks together with ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day, according to weight). Both groups were completely comparable according to age, gender, body weight, transaminase levels, genotype, viral load and hepatic inflammatory activity (Knodell Index). No control group was included for ethical reasons. Pegylated interferon was not available at the time of the study. Serum baseline samples were collected for the determination of genotype. Samples were also collected at baseline, weeks 4, 12, 24, 48 and 72, in order to detect and quantify HCV-RNA. The efficacy of treatment was evaluated by means of sustained viral response (SVR) characterized by persistent negativity of HCV-RNA at the end of the follow-up period. At week 4, the response to treatment was greater in group A (49.6%) compared with group B (34.5%) (P = 0.0002), and was maintained until week 12 (64.1% compared with 55.8% respectively) (P = 0.03). These differences disappeared at week 24, when group A (69%) was compared with group B (65%) (NS). At week 48, the response rate for group A was 50.6% compared with group B 47.4% (NS), and at week 72, the SVR in group A was 46% compared with 40.3% for group B (NS). The global SVR was 43.1%. On analysing the response to treatment according to genotype and viral load, we found that the induction treatment was slightly superior in patients with genotype 1 and an elevated viral load (>2 x 10(6) copies/ml). They achieved a SVR in group A of 39.1% compared with 25.5% in group B (P < 0.05). However, this slight improvement obtained in group A, was achieved at the expense of a greater percentage of dropouts compared with group B (6.4% vs 2.2%, P < 0.01); a greater rate of side effects (58.5 vs 36.7%, P < 0.05) and also a greater percentage of neutropenia (3.1% vs 0.9%, P < 0.05). The induction treatment presented a better initial response, but this was not maintained at the end of treatment, and did not improve the results obtained with the standard treatment. Although the patients with genotype 1 and elevated viral load had a better response with the induction treatment, this was accompanied by a greater percentage of dropouts and secondary effects. It would be interesting to repeat this type of study in the future, using pegylated interferon.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a significant contemporary health problem in the United States and elsewhere. Because it is primarily transmitted via blood, hepatitis C infection presents risks for both nosocomial transmission to patients and occupational spread to health care workers. Recent insights into the pathogenesis, immunopathogenesis, natural history, and treatment of infection caused by this unique flavivirus provide a rationale for the use of new strategies for managing occupational hepatitis C infections when they occur. This article reviews this developing information. Recently published data demonstrate success rates in the treatment of "acute hepatitis C syndrome" that approach 100\%, and although these studies are not directly applicable to all occupational infections, they may provide important clues to optimal management strategies. In addition, the article delineates approaches to the prevention of occupational exposures and also addresses the difficult issue of managing HCV-infected health care providers. The article summarizes currently available data about the nosocomial epidemiology of HCV infection and the magnitude of risk and discusses several alternatives for managing exposure and infection. No evidence supports the use of immediate postexposure prophylaxis with immunoglobulin, immunomodulators, or antiviral agents. Based on the very limited data available, the watchful waiting and preemptive therapy strategies described in detail in this article represent reasonable interim approaches to the complex problem of managing occupational HCV infections, at least until more definitive data are obtained.

We compared the performance characteristics of a standardized direct sequencing method (TRUGENE HCV 5'NC; Visible Genetics Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and a reverse hybridization line probe assay (INNO-LiPA HCV II; Bayer Corp., Tarrytown, N.Y.) for genotyping of hepatitis C virus (HCV). Both methods are based on detection of sequence heterogeneity in the 5' noncoding (5'NC) region. Concordance between the genotyping methods was assessed by testing 172 samples representing the six major genotypes. Sequence analysis of the more phylogenetically informative nonstructural 5B (NS5B) region was also done with 148 (86%) samples to confirm the accuracy of and resolve discrepancies between the 5'NC genotyping results. The sensitivities of the methods were assessed by using the 5'NC amplicon from both the qualitative and quantitative AMPLICOR HCV tests (Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, Ind.). The ability of the methods to detect mixed-genotype infections was determined with mixtures of two different genotypes at relative concentrations ranging from 1 to 50%. Both 5'NC methods were able to genotype 99.4% of the samples with type agreement for 99.5% and subtype agreement for 68.2% of the samples. No or ambiguous subtype results were found by the line probe assay for 16.5% and by the TRUGENE 5'NC test for 17.1% of the samples. Discrepancies occurred between the line probe assay and NS5B results at the type level for 1.4% of the samples and at the subtype level for 14.2% of the samples. Discrepancies also occurred between the TRUGENE 5'NC and NS5B results at the type level for 2% of the samples and at the subtype level for 8.1% of the samples. We also found two distinct strains of HCV classified as type 2 by analysis of the 5'NC region that were type 1 by analysis of the NS5B region. The sensitivities of the two 5'NC genotyping methods were comparable and dependent on the amplification test used ( approximately 10(3) IU/ml with the qualitative HCV RNA tests and approximately 10(5) IU/ml with the quantitative HCV RNA tests). Genotype mixtures were successfully identified at a relative concentration of 5% by the line probe assay and 10% by the TRUGENE 5'NC test. In conclusion, the performance characteristics of the 5'NC methods were similar and both methods produced accurate results at the genotype level but neither method should be used for subtyping.

This study analyzes the effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), and thus immunologic status, on hepatitis C virus (HCV) load and quasispecies diversity in patients coinfected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and HCV. Three cohorts of coinfected patients were analyzed retrospectively over a period of 7 to 10 months: group A was antiretroviral drug naïve at baseline and then on HAART for the remainder of the study, group B did not receive antiretroviral therapy at any point, and group C was on HAART for the entire study. HCV quasispecies diversity was analyzed by sequencing hypervariable region 1. In a longitudinal analysis, there was no significant change from baseline in any immunologic, virologic, or quasispecies parameter in any of the three groups. However, in comparison to groups A and B, group C had significantly higher CD4+- and CD8+-cell counts, a trend toward a higher HCV load, and significantly increased number of HCV clones, entropy, genetic distance, and ratio of nonsynonymous substitutions per nonsynonymous site to synonymous substitutions per synonymous site (Ka/Ks). In addition, CD4+-cell count was positively correlated with HCV load, genetic distance, and Ka. Interestingly, patients infected with HCV genotype 2 or 3 had a significantly higher CD4+-cell count, HCV load, genetic distance, and Ka/Ks than those infected with genotype 1. These results suggest that there is no immediate effect of HAART on HCV but that, with prolonged HAART, immune restoration results in an increase in HCV load and quasispecies diversity.

Although the 5' untranslated region (5' UTR) is the most conserved region of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) genome, it has been suggested that interrogation of this region is sufficient for determination of the HCV genotype. We compared two methods of determination of the HCV genotype: (i) direct sequencing of the DNA of the NS-5b region and (ii) reverse line probe assay (LiPA; INNO-LiPA HCV II; Innogenetics N.V.) of the 5' UTR. There was 100% concordance between the two methods for genotype but only 80% concordance for subtype. A significant percentage of genotype 1a isolates were misclassified by LiPA as genotype 1b. Sequence analysis revealed that the only consistent difference in the 5' UTR for these genotype 1a isolates misclassified as genotype 1b was a single nucleotide (A/G) at position -99 of the HCV genome. All isolates with discordant results analyzed had a G at this position, consistent with LiPA determination of these samples as subtype 1b. However, sequence analysis of 222 nucleotides in the NS-5b region clearly identified all of these isolates as subtype 1a. Population distribution data from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center of over 200 samples analyzed by sequencing of the NS-5b region and over 1,000 samples analyzed by LiPA also indicated that INNO-LiPA HCV II cannot accurately differentiate HCV genotype 1a isolates from HCV genotype 1b isolates. We provide evidence that the A/G at position -99 represents a sequence polymorphism in the HCV genome that cannot differentiate subtype 1a from subtype 1b isolates. In conclusion, the 5' UTR is not heterogeneous enough for use in determination of the HCV subtype and cannot be used for differentiation of HCV genotypes 1a and 1b.

The US blood supply has been tested for human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) using nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) of pools of small number of samples since early 1999. Since the implementation of NAT under an investigational new drug (IND) application, the results for the yield and false positivity have been remarkably consistent for greater than 2 years of testing even among multiple programmes using two different test methodologies and manufacturers: Gen-Probe/Chiron transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) and Roche polymerase chain reaction. All programmes in the US and Canada use NAT as a criterion for cellular as well as frozen product release. The focus of this paper is to provide an update of the programmes in the US and Canada, provide data in support of p24 antigen replacement by HIV-1 NAT and discuss the projections of residual risk of HIV, HCV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) following NAT and the associated cost/benefit.

To determine the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes in the area of El Ferrol, as well as their distribution according to risk factors.

A total of 479 patients with hepatitis C were studied, including 254 with no known risk factors, 161 intravenous drug abusers (IVDA) and 64 with a history of blood transfusions. The presence of HCV RNA was studied by RT-PCR, and a reverse hybridization method (INNO-LiPA) was used for genotyping.

Genotype distribution was as follows: 1b, 269 (56.2%); 1a, 79 (16.5%); 3a, 59 (12.3%); 4c/4d, 35 (7.3%); 1, 19 (4.0%); 2a/2c, 3 (0.6%); 4, 3 (0.6%); 2b, 2 (0.4%). In 10 patients (2.1%) genotype could not be determined. In patients with no known risk factor, the predominant genotype was 1b, detected in 191 of the 254 patients in this group (75.2%). Distribution of genotypes was more varied in the IVDA group, with the most frequent being 1a in 49 (30.4%) and 3a in 43 (26.7%). In the 64 patients who had received transfusions, 1b was predominant, detected in 54 of 64 patients (84.4%).

The predominant HCV genotype in our area is 1b. Differences in genotype distribution were observed in the population groups studied, according to their underlying risk factors.

To review hepatitis C virus (HCV), describe the types of molecular-based tests available for the diagnosis and management of HCV infection, and discuss the appropriate utilization of these tests.

Current information is presented from the published literature, as well as new information where available.

A major cause of posttransfusion and community-acquired non-A, non-B hepatitis worldwide is HCV. Approximately 4 million people in the United States are infected with HCV, resulting in 8000 to 10,000 deaths annually. Because HCV is not readily cultured, in vitro molecular-based tests have been developed for use in the diagnosis and treatment of HCV-infected patients. Molecular tests include qualitative and quantitative nucleic acid amplification tests, branched DNA tests, and HCV genotyping assays. Qualitative HCV nucleic acid amplification tests are used routinely in association with serologic tests to help make a diagnosis of infection with HCV. Quantitative HCV testing and genotyping methods have been found to be valuable tools in the treatment of infected patients. A patient's pretreatment HCV viral load and the rate of virus decline during therapy have been shown to correlate with the likelihood of long-term response to antiviral therapy. Information pertaining to the genotype of HCV infecting patients has been shown to be helpful in making recommendations regarding treatment. Certain genotypes of HCV are much more responsive to therapy, allowing a shorter course of treatment.

Molecular tests are valuable tools for use in the diagnosis and treatment of patients infected with HCV.

Most patients with an acute infection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) will develop chronic hepatitis, and only about 15-20% of the cases will resolve spontaneously. The mechanism for the different outcomes in patients with acute HCV infection remains unclear. HCV genotype has been recognized as an important factor affecting the clinical course and outcome of chronic hepatitis C patients. In order to evaluate the role of HCV genotype in the clinical course and outcome of acute posttransfusion hepatitis C, 67 patients with acute posttransfusion hepatitis C from a prospective study of posttransfusion non-A, non-B hepatitis were enrolled. Thirty-nine patients (58.2%) were HCV genotype 1b. Among the 67 patients with acute posttransfusion hepatitis C, 53 (79.1%) progressed to chronic hepatitis. Significantly more patients with genotype 1b than non-1b genotypes developed chronic hepatitis (89.7% vs. 64.3%; P = 0.019). There was no significant difference in gender, mean age, amount of transfused blood, hepatitis symptoms, jaundice, incubation period, peak serum alanine transaminase, or serum HCV RNA titer between patients with HCV genotype 1b and non-1b infections. Patients who developed chronic hepatitis had a significantly greater incidence of genotype 1b infection (66.0% vs. 28.6%; P = 0.013) and a longer incubation period (7.3 weeks vs. 5.4 weeks; P = 0.052) than patients whose infection was resolved. Patients with a genotype 1b infection that resolved itself spontaneously all had an incubation period of less than 6 weeks. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that genotype 1b and an incubation period > or = 6 weeks were significant predictive factors for the development of chronic hepatitis. Therefore, the HCV genotype can influence the outcome of patients with acute HCV infection.

Serologic assays for diagnosis of hepatitis C infection may yield indeterminate results despite improvements in sensitivity and specificity through second- and third-generation assays. Direct detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA based on qualitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction or transcription-mediated amplification allows diagnosis in the early stages of acute infection and in patients unable to mount an antibody response. Quantitative HCV RNA assays are useful for selecting appropriate antiviral therapies, but until recently they have lacked comparability between tests. More sensitive qualitative assays should be used for determining duration of treatment or recognizing a sustained virologic response to therapy. Hepatitis C virus genotyping can be performed from a limited sequence analysis of the viral genome by using various techniques. Although newer genotyping methods are relatively practicable and are satisfactory for the discrimination of the majority of genotypes, discrimination between subtypes can be challenging. Serologic typing of HCV lacks sensitivity and specificity compared with molecular-based techniques. Recent advances in serologic assays and nucleic acid detection techniques allow physicians to make accurate diagnoses, and these assays serve as important tools in treatment planning.

Hepatitis C virus, a recently identified member of the family Flaviviridae, is an important cause of chronic viral hepatitis and cirrhosis. There are similarities in the nature of the immune response to this pathogen with immunity in other flavivirus and hepatotropic virus infections, such as hepatitis B. However, the high rate of viral persistence after primary hepatitis C infection, and the observation that neutralizing antibodies are not protective, would suggest that there are a number of important differences between hepatitis C, other flaviviruses, and hepatitis B. The phenomenon of quasispecies evolution and other viral factors have been proposed to contribute to immune evasion by hepatitis C virus. In the face of established persistent infection, virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes may exert some control over viral replication. However, these same effectors may also be responsible for the progressive liver damage characteristic of chronic hepatitis C infection. The nature of protective immunity, including the role of innate immune responses early after hepatitis C exposure, remains to be defined.

Blood samples from 477 hospital workers (HWs) at the Central Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Budapest, Hungary were tested for hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies by enzyme immunoassay (EIA), and 13 (2.7%) of these were found to be HCV antibody positive. Ten (2.7%) were from nursing/housekeeping staff and three (2.9%) from medical staff. HCV antibody positive HWs were detected in 10 of 17 work places, and the prevalence rates in these departments or units varied between 1.2% and 6.5%. The prevalence increased gradually with increasing age, being 0% in these under 21 years of age and 9.5% in those above 50 years of age. Eleven (85%) of 13 HCV antibody positive HWs had HCV RNA in their sera, four of them intermittently during the follow-up period. HCV genotype 1 was present in two HWs, 1b in six HWs, 3a in one HW and 4 in two HWs. Chronic hepatitis C has developed in six (46%) HCV antibody positive HWs. Although the source of infection through needlestick could only be traced directly in one case, circumstantial evidence indicated that the majority of infections were occupationally acquired, originating from percutaneous or mucocutaneous exposure.

Determination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes and subtypes is of rising clinical importance. In times where also an increasing need for cost effectiveness can be observed, the demand for fast and easy performable assays grows.

To evaluate and compare different genotyping methods regarding their reliability, practicability, and expense in the daily routine.

Sera of 39 patients infected with different HCV subtypes were examined by a serological genotyping assay (NS-4 IBA), by the widely used INNO-LiPA HCV II, and by a nucleotide sequencing method.

The tests performed equally well in terms of HCV subtyping and no different results were obtained. However, the serotyping assay provided the results in less than half the time needed by the other two assays. Significant differences were also observed regarding the 'hands on' times and the costs. The technical equipment which was necessary to perform the assays is significantly reduced using the serological assay.

Our study demonstrates that the serological test offers the opportunity to determine HCV genotypes and subtypes reliably, fast, easy, and cost effective.

To determine the hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype distribution in Taiwan and to clarify the relationship between genotype and the pathogenesis of HCV infection, 1,164 subjects positive for serum HCV antibodies and HCV RNA from three HCV hyperendemic areas (Masago, Tzukuan, and Taoyuan) and a tertiary referral center in Taiwan were studied during 1995-1997. HCV genotypes and viral loads were determined using Okamoto's method and branched DNA assay, respectively. Genotype 1b was the most prevalent in Tzukuan (61.9%), Taoyuan (76.9%), and the referral center (47.0%). By contrast, genotype 2a was the major HCV type in Masago (63.5%). Prevalence of genotype 1b positively and that of genotype 2a negatively correlated to age, regardless of study populations (P < 0.01). Based on multivariate analysis, the significant factors associated with the presence of cirrhosis, with or without hepatocellular carcinoma, in chronic hepatitis C patients were genotype 1b and age. In conclusion, these results underline that independent HCV outbreaks continue in HCV hyperendemic areas in Taiwan, concomitant with a changing relative prevalence of HCV genotypes in relation to age. Both the correlation of genotype 1b with age (cohort effect) and intrinsic properties of HCV genotypes are probably responsible for the association between genotype and the pathogenesis of HCV infection.

Serologic assays for diagnosis of hepatitis C infection may yield indeterminate results despite improvements in sensitivity and specificity through second- and third-generation assays. Direct detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA based on qualitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction or transcription-mediated amplification allows diagnosis in the early stages of acute infection and in patients unable to mount an antibody response. Quantitative HCV RNA assays are useful for selecting appropriate antiviral therapies, but until recently they have lacked comparability between tests. More sensitive qualitative assays should be used for determining duration of treatment or recognizing a sustained virologic response to therapy. Hepatitis C virus genotyping can be performed from a limited sequence analysis of the viral genome by using various techniques. Although newer genotyping methods are relatively practicable and are satisfactory for the discrimination of the majority of genotypes, discrimination between subtypes can be challenging. Serologic typing of HCV lacks sensitivity and specificity compared with molecular-based techniques. Recent advances in serologic assays and nucleic acid detection techniques allow physicians to make accurate diagnoses, and these assays serve as important tools in treatment planning.

Typing of hepatitis C virus (HCV) isolates from Argentine patients was performed by using different methodologies in a population of 243 patients. HCV subtype was assigned based upon restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). HCV RNA genomes obtained from serum samples were classified as belonging to clade 1 (53.5%), 2 (23. 0%), or 3 (8.6%); 14.8% of samples showed HCV mixed infections, more frequently implying different subtypes within the same clade. In addition to RFLP typing, phylogenetic relatedness among sequences from both 5' untranslated region (n = 50) and nonstructural 5B coding region (n = 15) was established.

Exposure to blood-borne pathogens poses a serious risk to health care workers (HCWs). We review the risk and management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in HCWs and also discuss current methods for preventing exposures and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis. In the health care setting, blood-borne pathogen transmission occurs predominantly by percutaneous or mucosal exposure of workers to the blood or body fluids of infected patients. Prospective studies of HCWs have estimated that the average risk for HIV transmission after a percutaneous exposure is approximately 0.3%, the risk of HBV transmission is 6 to 30%, and the risk of HCV transmission is approximately 1.8%. To minimize the risk of blood-borne pathogen transmission from HCWs to patients, all HCWs should adhere to standard precautions, including the appropriate use of hand washing, protective barriers, and care in the use and disposal of needles and other sharp instruments. Employers should have in place a system that includes written protocols for prompt reporting, evaluation, counseling, treatment, and follow-up of occupational exposures that may place a worker at risk of blood-borne pathogen infection. A sustained commitment to the occupational health of all HCWs will ensure maximum protection for HCWs and patients and the availability of optimal medical care for all who need it.

To date the true prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) mixed-genotype infections has not been established mainly because currently available methods are not suitable for the detection of mixed genotypes in a viral population. A novel semiautomated genotyping method, primer-specific and mispair extension analysis (S-PSMEA), which is more reliable than other genotyping assays was developed for detection of HCV mixed-genotype infections. A genotype present at levels as low as 0.8% in a defined mix of HCV genotypes was detected, showing a 20-fold increase in sensitivity over that of direct DNA sequencing. A total of 434 HCV isolates were genotyped and analyzed for a comparative study of the accuracy between S-PSMEA and four current genotyping methods. The results showed that viruses in approximately 40% of the samples from this group determined to be infected with mixed genotypes by S-PSMEA were undetected by direct DNA sequencing due to its low sensitivity. Type-specific PCR, line probe assay, and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis performed poorly, being able to identify only 38.5, 16.1, and 15.4% of mixed-genotype infections, respectively, that were detected by direct DNA sequencing. The prevalence of mixed-genotype infections detected by S-PSMEA was 7.9% (12 of 152 donors) among HCV-infected blood donors, 14.3% (15 of 105) among patients with chronic hepatitis C, and 17.1% (6 of 36) among thalassemia patients who had received multiple transfusions. The data lead us to conclude that HCV mixed-genotype infections are more common than previously estimated and that S-PSMEA may be the method of choice when detection of genotypes present at low levels in mixed-genotype infections is required due to its higher level of sensitivity.

Exposure to blood-borne pathogens poses a serious risk to health care workers (HCWs). We review the risk and management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in HCWs and also discuss current methods for preventing exposures and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis. In the health care setting, blood-borne pathogen transmission occurs predominantly by percutaneous or mucosal exposure of workers to the blood or body fluids of infected patients. Prospective studies of HCWs have estimated that the average risk for HIV transmission after a percutaneous exposure is approximately 0.3%, the risk of HBV transmission is 6 to 30%, and the risk of HCV transmission is approximately 1.8%. To minimize the risk of blood-borne pathogen transmission from HCWs to patients, all HCWs should adhere to standard precautions, including the appropriate use of hand washing, protective barriers, and care in the use and disposal of needles and other sharp instruments. Employers should have in place a system that includes written protocols for prompt reporting, evaluation, counseling, treatment, and follow-up of occupational exposures that may place a worker at risk of blood-borne pathogen infection. A sustained commitment to the occupational health of all HCWs will ensure maximum protection for HCWs and patients and the availability of optimal medical care for all who need it.

To examine the seroprevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in the Australian injecting drug-using community in the 1970s, and to compare the profile of HCV genotypes with that seen in the 1990s.

Investigation of stored sera that were collected from injecting drug users in the 1970s and comparison with sera collected in the 1990s.

Inner Sydney, 1974-1975 and 1994-1996.

The 1970s group comprised 141 consecutive injecting drug users who attended the Brisbane Street Methadone Clinic. The 1990s group comprised 88 consecutive, injecting drug users of European origin who were HCV antibody-positive and attended a primary healthcare facility (the Kirketon Road Centre).

HCV antibody prevalence (1970s); profile of HCV serotypes (1970s and 1990s); and serological evidence of hepatitis A and B.

84% of the 1970s group were HCV antibody-positive, of whom 92% were infected with HCV serotype 1 and 1% with serotype 3. In contrast, in the 1990s group, 69% were infected with HCV serotype 1 and 25% with serotype 3. The HCV-positive subjects from the early group were more likely than those from the recent group to have serological evidence of previous HBV infection.

The high prevalence of HCV among injecting drug users in the 1970s in Australia confirms an epidemic that has been present for at least 25 years. Over this period, the proportion of HCV genotype 1 infections has decreased and genotype 3 infections have emerged.

It is now recognised that mixed viral infection, or infection of an individual with two or more distinct strains of a single viral species, often occurs particularly with RNA viruses. Current methods for detection of mixed infection normally involve genotyping or cloning and DNA sequencing. These methods are not always accurate or sensitive at detecting mixed infection and cannot be used for large numbers of samples. Furthermore subsequent sequence determination of the coinfecting viruses is labour intensive. This paper describes a simple, generic method based upon PCR and heteroduplex mobility analysis (HMA) that can be used to rapidly determine mixed infection with two strains of the same virus. The utility of this method is illustrated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and TT virus (TTV) as examples. PCR-HMA detected mixed infection in 3 (8%) of 38 sera from intravenous drug users (IVDU) and 28 (30%) of 70 TTV-positive sera from Australia, China, and Vietnam. HMA can also be used to screen recombinant colonies to identify the sequences of the coinfecting viruses. The methods described here could be applied to analyse any PCR product containing two or more divergent sequences, whether derived from viruses, bacteria, or eukaryotic organisms.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been classified into different genotypes/subtypes with demonstrated clinical implications. Whether there is biological difference between genotypes is unknown. We determined HCV genotype in 120 anti-HCV-positive patients with end-stage renal disease and on haemodialysis, by both serological assay (which showed evidence of previous exposure) and by two molecular assays: restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and line-probe reverse hybridization (LiPA). In mixing experiments, RFLP and LiPA was able to detect the minor HCV genotypes (if present) in 5-30% and 1-2% of the viral population, respectively. Of the 120 patients studied, genotype-specific antibodies were detected in 50 (42%), and eight patients had reactivities to peptides derived from multiple genotypes (genotypes 1 and 2 and/or 3). Only genotype 1 infection was found by RFLP/LiPA in these eight patients with reactivities to multiple HCV genotypes. One-hundred and five of the 120 (88%) patients were positive for HCV RNA by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis and 14 were found to have mixed genotype infection. Follow-up serum samples (4-21 months later) were available in five patients (genotype 1a with another genotype/subtype). All five patients had a reduced number of HCV genotypes detected during follow-up; four of the five patients still had detectable genotype 1a, and one patient lost genotype 1a and was positive for genotype 2b only. These data showed that HCV mixed infection can be reliably detected by molecular methods and, in patients with end-stage renal disease and mixed genotype infection, there is a trend that during follow-up, HCV genotype 1 may prevail, or 'take over' the genotype 2 and 3 infection.