The aging population and increasing use of assisted living facilities necessitate a better understanding of risk factors for adverse outcomes. Fever as a long-term risk factor in elderly populations remains understudied.

We analyzed data from 16,523 veterans in assisted living facilities between 2012-2022, examining the relationship between fever (defined as temperature ≥100.4°F) and mortality at 90-, 365-, and 730-days post-admission. Subjects were categorized by fever timing (none, at intake, or after intake), temperature severity, and percentage of days febrile.

Fever at intake and fever after admission were associated with significantly increased mortality compared to no fever (p < .001) at all time points. Higher fever temperatures (>105°F) and a greater percentage of days febrile (>5 %) correlated with worse mortality. Patients with fever at intake and a few percentage of days febrile (<5 %) had an OR of 1.24 (95 % CI 1.01-1.53) for mortality by 1 year compared to patients who did not have a fever. High (>105°F) early fever had an OR of 1.46 (95 % CI 1.20-1.78), and early fever with many days febrile (>5 %) had an OR of 1.53 (95 % CI 1.33-1.75) for mortality at 730 days compared to patients with no fever.

Fever in assisted living residents increases mortality risk for up to two years, depending on temperature severity and duration. These findings suggest a "long fever" phenomenon, where acute febrile episodes may have lasting consequences. Incorporating fever status into risk stratification may help identify high-risk patients requiring enhanced monitoring and care.

& STATEMENT OF IMPACTSARS-COV-2 infection can result in acute and long-lasting cognitive complaints, causing ongoing impairments in daily life which poses a challenge to society. Consequently, the evaluation and characterization of cognitive complaints, specifically in the domain of executive functions (EFs) affecting daily life, is imperative in formulating an effective neuropsychological response.In total 442 participants aged 18-65+ years from the Netherlands, Germany, Mexico, and Spain were included in an online questionnaire. Among others, the questionnaire consisted of demographics, the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning for Adults (BRIEF-A), measures of subjective disease progression severity and experienced subjective impairment in daily activities. To assess whether daily life activities are affected by EF impairments, the main BRIEF-A composite score (GEC) was analyzed. To determine whether disease-related COVID-19 factors predict EFs complaints in daily life, a stepwise regression analysis was performed with i) experienced disease severity, ii) time since disease, and iii) health risk factor as predictors.The study revealed noteworthy differences in the occurrence of EFs problems in daily life between both groups, as indicated by the GEC, which exhibited a medium effect size even 6 months post-COVID-19 diagnosis even in mild disease progression. The scores of the BRIEF-A subscales follow a domain-specific profile, and includes clinically relevant impairments in: Working memory, Plan/Organize, Task Monitor, Shift, which are affected by the experienced severity of the disease. This cognitive profile has important implications for targeted cognitive training in rehabilitation and has the potential for an applicability to other viruses as well.

BackgroundUnderstanding Long COVID's impact on healthcare workers (HCWs) is vital for patient safety and care quality. However, research on its prevalence among HCWs in Singapore and its work impact is lacking.ObjectiveThis study aims to assess Long COVID prevalence and its impact on work role functioning among HCWs in two Singapore tertiary hospitals, filling a critical gap in the literature.MethodsConducted from January to April 2023, this study evaluated Long COVID prevalence and its impact on HCWs' work-role functioning in two Singapore tertiary hospitals. HCWs over 21, having experienced ≥1 COVID-19 infection, participated in an online survey. Long COVID, defined by NICE criteria, entailed symptoms persisting for 4 or more weeks. Work-related functioning was assessed using WRFQv2.0. Descriptive analyses were conducted using STATA software.ResultsOut of 15,882 eligible participants, 573 responded (3.6% response rate). Long COVID prevalence (symptoms persisting for ≥4 weeks) was 47.5%, notably higher among younger HCWs (<40 years old), those with moderate/severe infections, and multiple infections. HCWs with Long COVID had significantly lower WRFQv2.0 mean scores compared to those without (85.1 vs. 74.3, p < 0.05). Additionally, HCWs with symptoms for ≥12 weeks had significantly lower scores than those without Long COVID (85.6 vs. 74.3, p < 0.05).ConclusionThis study underscores Long COVID's potential impact on HCWs' work role functioning, especially among those with prolonged symptoms. Tailored work adjustments are crucial for their successful return to pre-illness levels, highlighting the importance of addressing Long COVID in healthcare settings.

In this overview we summarize the current state of scientific knowledge on the epidemiology, etiology, clinical symptoms and therapy of post-COVID disease.The study is based on a search of the scientific literature available on PubMed and on our own clinical experience in the post-COVID outpatient clinic.The prevalence of post-COVID disease varies greatly depending on the survey method used. The symptoms of post-COVID are manifold, but fatigue, cardiopulmonary complaints, cognitive deficit, and pain syndromes are prominent. There are currently no surefire symptoms or specific markers that prove the presence of the disease. Therefore, diagnosis is often based on an exclusion of other diagnoses, which requires good interdisciplinary cooperation. Therapy for post-COVID disease is also not specific but is always individual and symptom-oriented. There have been various attempts to explain the pathogenesis of post-COVID, but the mechanisms behind the development of the condition have not yet been conclusively clarified. Persistence of the virus or of viral proteins may cause protracted infection or autoimmunity. Infection and inflammation of the endothelium of the small vessels and the hypercoagulation associated with this may lead to local cytokine dysregulation and organ damage. Further clarification of the pathogenesis of post-COVID and the establishment of effective diagnostic tools and therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. · Post-COVID is a commonly reported condition with variable symptoms. · Interdisciplinary exclusion of other diagnoses and therapy planning are important. · Clarification of pathogenesis and establishment of diagnostic markers are urgently needed. · Reisinger EC, Geerdes-Fenge H, Wossidlo C et al. Long/Post-Covid - An Interdisciplinary Challenge. Rofo 2025; DOI 10.1055/a-2578-1363.

Patients with post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) experience persistent, long-term health consequences following SARS-CoV-2 infection, including fatigue, hyperventilation, cognitive impairment, and limitations in daily activities. There is emerging evidence suggesting that exercise and respiratory therapy-based telerehabilitation is safe and could potentially improve physical capacity while reducing health care costs.

This study aims to evaluate the superiority of a multimodal, symptom-titrated telerehabilitation program over standard care in patients with PCC who are severely affected, using the highest oxygen uptake rate (VO2peak [mL/min/kg]) achieved during the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope (VE/VCO2 [full slope]) as primary outcomes. In addition, this study seeks to provide novel insights into the clinical and physiological adaptations associated with PCC, informing future rehabilitation strategies.

This prospective, randomized, waitlist-controlled trial was approved by the Rhineland-Palatinate Medical Association ethics committee. All procedures comply with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study comprises 3 examination time points, which include patient-reported outcomes, clinical assessments, and a CPET. It is structured into an 8-week intervention phase followed by an 8-week follow-up phase. Following baseline assessment, patients will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (IG) or the control group (CG). During the intervention phase, IG participants will receive a web-based, multimodal, symptom-titrated telerehabilitation program consisting of sports medicine consultations, weekly teleconsultations, a structured pacing approach, and exercise and respiratory therapy. In contrast, CG participants will receive treatment as usual, which includes a single sports medicine consultation on healthy habits and a self-directed pacing approach for managing symptoms and daily activities. During the follow-up phase, IG participants will continue training independently without teleconsultations, whereas CG participants will undergo the same telerehabilitation intervention as the IG. A follow-up assessment will be conducted for both groups to evaluate long-term effects. This study adheres to the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) guidelines and follows the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template.

Recruitment began in August 2023 and was extended until March 2025. As of March 2025, 80 participants have been recruited, and data analysis is ongoing. Final results are expected by December 2025, with a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data anticipated by July 2025.

This study is the first randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of multimodal and symptom-titrated telerehabilitation in patients with PCC who are severely affected. The integration of various objective diagnostic systems will provide valuable insights into emerging postviral fatigue syndromes, supporting the development of CPET-based diagnostics, personalized rehabilitation strategies, and future research on long-term telerehabilitation effectiveness. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, professional networks, and patient advocacy groups to ensure scientific, clinical, and public impact.

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) DRKS00032394; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00032394.

DERR1-10.2196/65044.

Up to 80% of patients who develop coronavirus disease-2019 (Covid-19) infection subsequently experience long covid/post-covid syndrome. The World Health Organization (WHO) has estimated that >770 million patients have been infected with Covid-19 globally. Even if only 10% of these patients develop long covid, > 75 million patients will suffer for a long period. Among the various symptoms of post-covid syndrome, fatigue is common, affecting up to 60% of the patients. As observed in other viral infections, elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines may play a role. Transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a noninvasive method that modulates the immune system via the central nervous system and has shown promising effects in autoimmune diseases and improving fatigue. In this pilot study, we investigated the feasibility of daily taVNS in patients with long covid-related fatigue. Additionally, the effects of taVNS on fatigue and quality of life will be analyzed.

A total of 45 adult patients with long covid associated fatigue syndrome will be enrolled in this study, and will be randomized to the above-threshold-stimulation, below-threshold-stimulation, or sham-stimulation arms, after being informed that they will feel the stimulation. The above-threshold-group will receive a 4-week-long left-sided cymba conchae taVNS with 25 Hz, 250 µs pulse width 28s/32s on/off paradigm for 4 h throughout the day. The below-threshold group will receive stimulation below the sensational threshold, whereas the sham group will receive no stimulation following application of a non-functional electrode. The daily stimulation protocol will be recorded either manually or using the provided app. Three well-established questionnaires, the Multidimensional-Fatigue-Inventory-20, Short-Form-36, and Beck-Depression-Inventory, and the newly established Post-Covid-Syndrome-Score will be completed both before and after 4 weeks of stimulation.

The primary endpoint has been set as the patients' average daily stimulation time after 4 weeks, while secondary endpoints include the effects of taVNS on fatigue and Quality of Live (QoL). As a non-invasive treatment option, taVNS may be a notable alternative for patients with post-covid related fatigue.

This study was approved by the local ethics committee (23/7798) and registered (DRKS00031974) (see supporting information files).

The ethical justifiability of this study was supported by prior research demonstrating the safety of taVNS. Patients will be recruited by general practitioners, and written informed consent will be obtained. All data will be pseudonymized for collection and storage. The study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals with the aim of providing evidence of the potential of taVNS in long covid management. The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

SARS-CoV-2 infection triggers a strong antibody response toward nucleocapsid protein (NP), suggesting its extracellular presence beyond intravirion RNA binding. Our co-culture experiments show NP decorates infected and proximal uninfected cell surfaces. We propose a mechanism whereby extracellular NP on uninfected cells contributes to COVID-19 pathogenicity. We show that NP binds to cell-surface sulfated glycosaminoglycans using its RNA-binding sites, facilitated by the flexible, positively charged linker. Coating uninfected lung-derived cells with NP attracted anti-NP IgG from lung fluids and sera of COVID-19 patients. Immune recognition was significantly higher in moderate versus mild COVID-19. Binding of anti-NP IgG in sera generated clusters, triggering C3b deposition via the classical complement pathway on SARS-CoV-2 non-susceptible cells co-cultured with infected cells. The heparin analog enoxaparin outcompeted NP binding, rescuing cells from anti-NP IgG-mediated complement deposition. Our findings reveal how extracellular NP may exacerbate COVID-19 damage and suggest preventative therapy avenues.

SARS-Cov-19 virus is known to attack multiple organ systems including the brain and as a result, numerous of these patients manifest neurocognitive disorders. Moreover COVID-19, causes gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea or constipation, loss of appetite and weight loss and these symptoms have been linked to neurocognitive dysfunction. According to studies, COVID-19 patients who report gastrointestinal symptoms as the predominant manifestations, perform worse on neurocognitive tests than those who do not suffer from such symptoms. In this study, we examined whether hospitalized COVID-19 patients with gastrointestinal symptoms presented neurocognitive dysfunction.

The study enrolled 92 COVID-19 patients, hospitalized for 6-20 days, who were divided into 2 groups: the gastrointestinal group (GI) (n = 44) who presented with predominant gastrointestinal symptoms such as anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain and the group without GI symptoms, (nGI) (n = 48), who reported fever, fatigue and symptoms from the respiratory system as the main symptoms. Neurocognitive assessment was performed by questionnaires administered to all patients, three months after the first positive PCR test for COVID-19.

T-test was conducted for each test. Results revealed that patients with GI symptoms had significantly lower performance on neuropsychological functions such as complex scanning and long-term memory, visuospatial perception, executive function, verbal working memory and short-term memory, compared to patients without GI symptoms.

We found that there was a significant relationship between cognitive function and GI symptoms. This indicates that COVID-19 patients with GI symptoms may be at increased risk for developing deficits with their memory and other aspects of cognition.

The most frequently reported post-coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms include shortness of breath, fatigue, and cognitive disturbances, with reports of persistent dyspnea ranging between 26% and 41%. There is an urgent need to understand the risk factors and predictors for persistent COVID-19 dyspnea in individuals at all levels of COVID-19 illness severity, to enable the implementation of targeted interventions for those likely to be most affected with persistent dyspnea. Thus, the purpose of this systematic review is to explore the risk factors and predictors that are associated with persistent dyspnea in the post-COVID-19 population. This review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered prospectively in PROSPERO as CRD42023466713. A search strategy was conducted across PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases, that included studies conducted from 2020 to March 2024. The Covidence platform was used for screening studies, scoring methodologic quality, and performing data extraction using a two-step independent review process. This review included 33 studies, addressing 83,920 participants across 20 countries. The strongest predictive risk factors for persistent dyspnea included the following: female sex, elevated body mass index, pulmonary comorbidities, pre-existing anxiety and depression, pre-COVID-19 physical limitations, the severity of the COVID-19 illness, and socioeconomic differences. Potential risk factors included increased age, smoking history, and COVID-19 variant type. The presence of biomarkers for persistent dyspnea in the post-COVID-19 population can be used by clinicians to prospectively identify those individuals who should be flagged. Early identification may then be leveraged for timely referral for prophylactic and rehabilitative interventions for dyspnea. A personalized plan to target those risk factors that are modifiable should follow.

Increased risks of death and hospitalisation for organ disorders after discharge for COVID-19 hospitalisation have been reported but their persistence is unknown.

We conducted a nationwide cohort study using the French claims database; subjects hospitalised for COVID-19 between 2020/01/01 and 2020/08/30 were followed up to 30-months and matched to controls from the general population (GP) not hospitalised for COVID-19 during this period. Outcomes were all-cause mortality and organ disorders-related hospitalisation identified using ICD-10 codes. Cumulative incidences were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) were estimated such as the adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratio on 6-month periods during the follow-up using Cox regressions.

63,990 COVID-19 subjects (mean age (SD) 65 years (18), 53.1% male) were matched to 319,891 controls. The weighted cumulative incidences of all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalisation were 5,218/105 person-years (PY) [95%CI 5,127; 5,305] and 16,334/105 PY [16,162; 16,664] among COVID-19 subjects and 4,013/105 [3,960; 4,047] and 12,095/105 PY [12,024; 12,197] among controls, respectively. COVID-19 subjects were more likely to be hospitalised for cardiovascular (IRR 1.22 [1.15; 1.29]), psychiatric (IRR 1.41 [1.29; 1.53]), neurological (IRR 1.50 [1.41; 1.61]), and respiratory events (IRR 1.99 [1.87; 2.12]). The excess risk strongly decreased after the first 6 months for all outcomes but remained significantly increased up to 30-month for neurological, respiratory disorders, chronic renal failure and diabetes.

COVID-19 hospitalised subjects were at increased risk of death or hospitalisation for various organ disorders up to 30 months after discharge, reflecting the multi-organ consequences of the disease.

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a chronic debilitating condition with no cure that shares commonality with long-COVID. This review examines current understanding of long-COVID symptoms, characteristics of the affected population, the connection with ME/CFS, and the potential for salubrinal, an agent known for its influence on cellular stress pathways, to mitigate these disorders It also describes the historical development and mechanism of action of salubrinal, to mitigate endoplasmic reticulum (ER)/cellular stress responses, that could potentially contribute to symptom improvement in both ME/CFS and long-COVID patients. Further research and clinical trials are warranted to advance our understanding of the potential role of salubrinal in improving the quality of life for individuals with long-COVID-related ME/CFS symptoms as well as ME/CFS patients.

Background: This study aims to identify the factors related to demographic variables and physical performance associated with quality of life (QoL) in post-COVID-19 pa-tients who have recovered from mild infection and were not hospitalized. Methods: Seventy-four post-COVID-19 individuals who recovered from mild COVID-19 infec-tion were assessed for the baseline demographic variables (age, sex, height, weight, body mass index; BMI) and clinical information (comorbidities, duration of COVID-19 infection, and exercise habits). Vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen sat-uration; SpO2) were measured. Physical performance was evaluated for upper- and lower-limb muscle strength, ability of balance, and cardiorespiratory performance. All participants were assessed for QoL. Results: Hand grip strength was negatively asso-ciated with gender and age while positively associated with the duration of COVID-19. Quadricep strength also showed a negative association with gender and duration of COVID-19. Age was positively associated with multiple quality of life dimensions, while emotional role limitations were negatively associated with the duration of COVID-19 and waist circumference. Mental health was negatively linked to BMI. Conclusions: This study highlights the complex impact of COVID-19 on physical per-formance and QoL, revealing that older adults often report better QoL despite reduced muscle strength, particularly in women. The findings emphasize the need for targeted rehabilitation programs addressing both physical and emotional health for vulnerable groups.

Most patients recover fully after an acute infection by SARS-CoV-2. Some, however, may develop pulmonary sequelae (PS) and/or long COVID (LC). However, whether these two clinical conditions have similar or different pathogenic mechanisms is unknown.

The levels of autoantibodies and 184 inflammatory and organ damage associated proteins in plasma were determined (by immunofluorescence and Olink panels, respectively) 1 year after an acute infection by SARS-CoV-2 in 51 patients with PS (DLCO < 80% ref), 31 patients with LC and 31 patients fully recovered (Rec). PS was defined by the presence of reduced carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) lower than 80% ref. LC was defined by the presence of chronic symptoms in the absence of an alternative diagnosis.

We found that patients with PS or LC both showed increased levels than Rec of anti-microbial, immune cell activation and recruitment related proteins. Patients with PS showed higher levels of anti-nuclear autoantibodies, whereas LC patients had increased levels of organ-damage associated proteins. In patients with PS most of the elevated proteins correlate with the impairment of lung function (DLCO). Finally, in PS we additionally performed the determinations at an earlier time point (6 months) and showed that the expression of CCL20 and IFN-ɣ was already higher at 6 months, while CCL3 and CCL19 increase from 6 to 12 months, suggesting a pathogenic role in PS persistence.

Patients with PS or LC have abnormal but different persistent circulatory immune and organ damage biomarkers, suggesting different underlying biology of both post-COVID conditions.

As the COVID-19 pandemic evolved, long COVID emerged as a significant threat to public health, characterized by one or more persistent symptoms impacting organ systems beyond 12 weeks of infection. Informative research has been derived from assessments of long COVID among the Chinese populace. However, none of these studies considered the COVID-19 experience of Chinese residents in Canada. Objectives: We aimed to fill this literature gap by delineating the long COVID experience, prevalence, and associated factors among a sample of Chinese residing in Canada during the pandemic. Methods: The present study employed a cross-sectional online survey questionnaire distributed to a sample of Canadian Chinese using a convenience sampling procedure from 22 December 2022 to 15 February 2023. Respondents were probed for sociodemographic background and health-, COVID-, and vaccine-related characteristics. Logistic LASSO regression was used for model building, and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with developing long COVID. Results: Among 491 eligible participants, 63 (12.83%) reported experiencing long COVID with a mean duration of 5.31 (95% CI: 4.06-6.57) months and major symptoms including difficulty concentrating (21.67%), pain/discomfort (15.00%), as well as anxiety/depression (8.33%). Our final model identified significant associations between long COVID and two or more COVID-19 infections (OR = 23.725, 95% CI: 5.098-110.398, p < 0.0001), very severe/severe symptoms (OR = 3.177, 95% CI: 1.160-8.702, p = 0.0246), over-the-counter medicine (OR = 2.473, 95% CI: 1.035-5.909, p = 0.0416), and traditional Chinese medicine (OR = 8.259, 95% CI: 3.016-22.620, p < 0.0001). Further, we identified a significant protective effect of very good/good health status (OR = 0.247, 95% CI: 0.112-0.544, p = 0.0005). Conclusions: Long COVID effected a notable proportion of Canadian Chinese for a prolonged period during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings underscore the importance of preexisting health status and reinfection prevention when managing long COVID. Moreover, our work indicates an association between using over-the-counter medicine or traditional Chinese medicine and long COVID experience among Canadian Chinese.

This study aimed to analyze the risk factors of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (LEDVT) in emergency inpatients in the post-epidemic era, and to establish a prediction model for identifying high-risk patients of LEDVT.

Emergency inpatients admitted to our hospital from June 2022 to June 2023 were divided into two groups: the epidemic group and the post-epidemic group. The baseline characteristics, blood routine, liver and kidney function, blood coagulation function, and LE ultrasonography were compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic analysis and receiver operating character (ROC) curve were used to establish and evaluate the effectiveness of a prediction model for LEDVT in the post-epidemic era.

A total of 967 patients were analyzed, including 388 cases in the epidemic group and 579 cases in the post-epidemic group. The portion of LEDVT cases in the post-epidemic group (33.2%) was significantly higher than that in the epidemic group (26.8%, P = 0.036). Binary Logistic regression analysis showed that age, smoking history, drinking history and glycosylated hemoglobin (HBA1c) were independent risk factors for thrombosis. The prediction model was established as P = 0.863 × age + 0.978 × smoking history + 0.702 × drinking history + 0.104 × HBA1c - 2.439. The area under the ROC curve was 0.718.

The incidence of LEDVT in emergency inpatients in the post-epidemic era was significantly higher than that in the epidemic period. Age, smoking and drinking history, and glycosylated hemoglobin are at high risk for thrombosis.

Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) are often reported to occur concurrently with mast cell activation disorders (MCADs) and hereditary alpha tryptasemia (HAT). However, it remains unclear whether evidence supporting this relationship exists.

To determine the prevalence of MCADs and HAT in patients diagnosed with having EDS and or POTS.

We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), Scopus, and Web of Science with the assistance of an experienced medical librarian. We focused on patients with any MCAD or HAT in conjunction with a diagnosis of POTS and/or EDS.

A total of 200 records were screened, 107 were excluded based on the title or abstract, 92 full texts were reviewed, and 1 record was not retrieved. No studies were identified that met our primary criterion of including patients diagnosed with any MCAD or HAT alongside POTS and/or EDS based on our prespecified diagnostic criteria.

Our review did not find evidence to confirm a relationship between MCADs, HAT, POTS, and EDS. However, it must be mentioned that 1 study revealed an association between mast cell activation syndrome, POTS, and EDS and came close to meeting the full diagnostic criteria for mast cell activation syndrome, unlike other studies. This indicates that further research using strict and validated diagnostic criteria is needed to clarify whether a true association between conditions exists.

Long COVID has emerged as a significant challenge since the COVID-19 pandemic, which was declared as an outbreak in March 2020, marked by diverse symptoms and prolonged duration of disease. Defined by the WHO as symptoms persisting or emerging for at least two months post-SARS-CoV-2 infection without an alternative cause, its prevalence varies globally, with estimates of 10-20% in Europe, 7.3% in the USA, and 3.0% in the UK. The condition's etiology remains unclear, involving factors, such as renin-angiotensin system overactivation, persistent viral reservoirs, immune dysregulation, and autoantibodies. Reactivated viruses, like EBV and HSV-6, alongside epigenetic alterations, exacerbate mitochondrial dysfunction and energy imbalance. Emerging evidence links SARS-CoV-2 to chromatin and gut microbiome changes, further influencing long-term health impacts. Diagnosis of long COVID requires detailed systemic evaluation through medical history and physical examination. Management is highly individualized, focusing mainly on the patient's symptoms and affected systems. A multidisciplinary approach is essential, integrating diverse perspectives to address systemic manifestations, underlying mechanisms, and therapeutic strategies. Enhanced understanding of long COVID's pathophysiology and clinical features is critical to improving patient outcomes and quality of life. With a growing number of cases expected globally, advancing research and disseminating knowledge on long COVID remain vital for developing effective diagnostic and management frameworks, ultimately supporting better care for affected individuals.

Post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) causes persistent symptoms that impair quality of life, and telerehabilitation (TR) provides an effective remote alternative for addressing these challenges.

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a TR-based exercise program on dyspnea, pain intensity, and functional capacity in individuals with PCS.

Sixty PCS patients were randomized into a telerehabilitation group (TG, n = 32) or a control group (CG, n = 28). The TG received supervised TR sessions twice a week for 6 weeks, while the CG performed unsupervised home exercises. Assessments were conducted at the baseline and the end of 6 weeks.

TG showed significantly greater improvements compared to CG. mMRC decreased by 1.16 (95% CI, 0.93-1.38) vs. 0.36 (95% CI, 0.17-0.55), NPRS by 1.44 (95% CI, 0.95-1.92) vs. 0.6 (95% CI, 0.28-0.93), and 5-TST improved by 6.8 s (95% CI, 5.59-8.01) vs. 2.12 s (95% CI, 1.08-3.17). Significant differences were also observed for PSQI (p = 0.018) and HADS-anxiety (p = 0.001).

A TR-based exercise program significantly reduced dyspnea and pain intensity while improving functional capacity in PCS patients, making it an effective alternative to unsupervised exercise regimens.

This study is prospectively registered at NCT05381675 ( clinicaltrials.gov ).

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic was a global health crisis with far-reaching consequences. Among these were physical and mental health complications that emerged weeks or even months after the initial COVID-19 infection, collectively termed "long COVID" or "post-COVID syndrome." Identifying the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical manifestations, and management strategies for long COVID is crucial for both clinicians and patients, which is the focus of this review. The prevalence of long COVID varies across studies, generally ranging from 5% to 20%. Prominent risk factors include female sex, older age, a high number of acute symptoms, lower socioeconomic status, and underlying comorbidities such as diabetes, asthma, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The clinical manifestations of long COVID are diverse; beyond the commonly reported symptoms of fatigue, malaise, ageusia, and anosmia, neuropsychiatric complications such as headache, cognitive deficits, and depression are also potential outcomes. Although there is currently no consensus on the management of long COVID, multidisciplinary care teams with appropriate referrals and follow-up diagnostic studies are essential in evaluating the clinical course of long COVID patients.

Hyperinflammation is a significant factor in long COVID, impacting over 65 million post-COVID-19 individuals globally. Herbal remedies, including propolis, show promise in reducing severity and pro-inflammatory cytokines. However, the natural pharmacological role of propolis in COVID-19 management remains underexplored. Employing network pharmacology and in silico techniques, we assessed propolis extract's potential in countering SARS-CoV-2-induced inflammation. We identified 80 flavonoids via LC-MS/MS QTOF and employed 11 anti-inflammatory drugs as references for inflammation target fishing. Utilizing in silico techniques encompassing target fishing, molecular docking, and dynamics, we examined propolis' effects. We identified 1105 gene targets connected to inflammation through multiple validated target predictors. By integrating SARS-CoV-2 DEGs from GSE147507 with these targets, we identify 25 inflammation-COVID-19-associated propolis targets, including STAT1, NOS2, CFB, EIF2K2, NPY5R, and BTK. Enrichment analyses highlighted primary pharmacological pathways related to Epstein-Barr virus infection and COVID-19. Molecular docking validated isokaempferide, iristectorigenin B, 3'-methoxypuerarin, cosmosiin, and baicalein-7-O-β-d-glucopyranoside, which exhibited strong binding affinity and stability with relevant genes. Moreover, our findings indicate that propolis ligands could potentially suppress reactivation of Epstein-Barr Virus infections in post-COVID-19 cases. However, this study has a limitation in that the concentration of each propolis compound has not been quantified. Therefore, further exploration of propolis compounds quantification and experimental validation are needed to support these findings.

The long-term symptomatology of COVID-19 has yet to be comprehensively described. The aim of the study was to describe persistent COVID-19 symptoms in a cohort of hospitalized and home-isolated patients.

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on long COVID patients. Long COVID symptoms were identified, and patients were divided into hospitalized (in-patients) and home-isolated (out-patients), as well as according to the number of symptoms. Patients were examined by a multidisciplinary medical team. Blood tests, high resolution chest computed tomography (CT), and physical and infectious examinations were performed. Finally, in-patients were evaluated at 2 time-points: on hospital admission (T0) and 3 months after discharge (Tpost).

There were 364 COVID-19 patients enrolled; 82% of patients reported one or more symptoms. The most reported symptom was fatigue. Chest CT showed alteration in 76% of patients, and pulmonary function alterations were observed in 44.7% of patients. A higher risk of presenting at least one symptom was seen in patients treated with corticosteroid, and a higher risk of presenting chest CT residual lesion was observed in hospitalized patients and in patients that received hydroxychloroquine treatment. Moreover, a higher risk of altered pulmonary function was observed in older patients.

Long-term sequelae are present in a remarkable number of long COVID patients and pose a new challenge to the health care system to identify long-lasting effects and improve patients' well-being. Multidisciplinary teams are crucial to develop preventive measures, and clinical management strategies.

To investigate the association between symptoms of long-term effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (long COVID) and sleep problems in a sample population from southern Brazil. This cross-sectional study used data from the SULcovid-19 survey, developed in the municipality of Rio Grande, RS, Brazil. The outcome, long COVID, was investigated through the presence of 18 symptoms, and the exposure variable was sleep problems. Poisson regression with robust adjustment for variance was used to estimate crude and adjusted prevalence ratios for the outcome-exposure relationship. Odds ratio was calculated through multinomial regression of the relationship between the number of symptoms of long COVID and sleep problems. Analyses were adjusted for sex, age, marital status, income, body mass index, smoking status, comorbidities, and hospital admission. A total of 2919 adults and older adults were interviewed. The prevalence of long COVID was 48.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 46.5-50.1%) and sleep problems were reported by 41.2% of the sample (95% CI 39.4-43.0%). Individuals with sleep problems were more likely to exhibit altered sensitivity (prevalence ratio [PR] 3.27; 95% CI 1.96-5.45), nasal congestion (PR 2.75; 95% CI 1.53-4.94), musculoskeletal symptoms (PR 1.75; 95% CI 1.48-2.06), respiratory issues (PR 1.58; 95% CI 1.24-2.01), and one or more symptom of long COVID (PR 1.27; 95% CI 1.15-1.39). Approximately one-half of the population analysed had long COVID, and four of 10 reported experiencing sleep problems. In addition, the sample tended to have experienced a greater number of symptoms compared with those who reported to sleep well.

Background Long COVID, or post-COVID condition, includes multi-system chronic sequelae that can last weeks, months, or even years in some individuals after recovery from COVID-19 infection. Prominent among these long-term sequelae are cognitive deficits that may prove to be problematic, especially for the working young adult population. The present study aimed to determine whether cognitive deficits are observed long after recovery from mild COVID-19 infection. Methods In this cross-sectional observational study, 29 young adult undergraduate medical students with a history of mild COVID-19 infection at least two years prior were included as cases, while 29 age- and sex-matched undergraduate medical students with no history of COVID-19 were recruited as controls. Sociodemographic data were collected, and the participants were then administered a series of cognitive tests using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox V3 software (Toolbox Assessments Inc., Chicago, USA; https://nihtoolbox.org/) to evaluate the cognitive functions, including executive function, cognitive flexibility, attention, working and episodic memory, and processing speed. Results The mean age of the cases and controls was 19.37 ± 0.92 and 19.65 ± 0.99 years, respectively. However,there was no statistically significant difference in cognitive function performance across any of the tested domains between cases and controls. Conclusion The results of our study indicate that, compared to healthy controls, cognitive functions were not impaired in young adults who previously had symptomatic mild COVID-19 infection.

An infection of SARS-CoV-1, the causative agent of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), may be followed by long-term clinical sequala. We hypothesized a greater 20-year multimorbidity incidence in people hospitalized for SARS-CoV-1 infection than those for influenza during similar periods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a territory-wide public healthcare database in Hong Kong. All patients aged ≥15 hospitalized for SARS in 2003 or influenza in 2002 or 2004 with no more than one of 30 listed chronic disease were included. Demographics, clinical history, and medication use were adjusted for in the inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighted Poisson regression analyses. We identified 1255 hospitalizations for SARS-CoV-1 infection and 687 hospitalizations for influenza. Overall crude multimorbidity incident rates were 1.5 per 100 person-years among SARS patients and 5.6 among influenza patients. Adjusted multimorbidity incidence rate ratio (IRR) was estimated at 0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70-0.86) for SARS patients compared with influenza patients. Analysis by follow-up period shows a potentially greater risk among SARS patients in the first year of follow-up (IRR 1.33, 95% CI 0.97-1.84), with the risk in influenza patients increasing in subsequent years. Subgroup analyses by age and sex showed consistent results with the main analysis that SARS-CoV-1 infection was not followed by a higher incidence of multimorbidity than influenza. Notable differences in the patterns of multimorbidity were identified between the two arms. To conclude, we found no evidence of a higher multimorbidity incidence after hospitalization for SARS than for influenza over the long-term.

The Post-acute Sequela of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) syndrome, also known as Long-COVID, often presents with subjective symptoms such as brain fog and cognitive fatigue. Increased tinnitus, and decreased hearing in noise ability also occur with PASC, yet whether auditory manifestations of PASC are linked with the cognitive symptoms is not known. Electrophysiology, specifically the Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR), provides objective measures of auditory processing. We hypothesized that ABR findings would be linked to PASC and with subjective feelings of cognitive fatigue. Eighty-two individuals, 37 with PASC (mean age: 47.5, Female: 83%) and 45 healthy controls (mean age: 38.5, Female: 76%), were studied with an auditory test battery that included audiometry and ABR measures. Peripheral hearing thresholds did not differ between groups. The PASC group had a higher prevalence of tinnitus, anxiety, depression, and hearing handicap in addition to increased subjective cognitive fatigue. ABR latency findings showed a significantly greater increase in the wave V latency for PASC subjects when a fast (61.1 clicks/sec) compared to a slow click (21.1 clicks/sec) was used. The increase in latency correlated with cognitive fatigue scores and predicted PASC status. The ABR V/I amplitude ratio was examined as a measure of central gain. Although these ratios were not significantly elevated in the full PASC group, to minimize the cofounding effect of age, the cohort was median split on age. Elevated V/I amplitude ratios were significant predictors of both predicted PASC group classification and cognitive fatigue scores in the younger PASC subjects compared to age-matched controls providing evidence of elevated central gain in younger individuals with PASC. More frequent tinnitus also significantly predicted higher subjective cognitive fatigue scores. Our findings suggest that PASC may alter the central auditory pathway and lead to slower conduction and elevated auditory neurophysiology responses at the midbrain, a pattern associated with the typical aging process. This study marks a significant stride toward establishing an objective measure of subjective cognitive fatigue through assessment of the central auditory system.

Some patients with chronic conditions are unreceptive to a psychological approach. This study aimed to explore the experience of Long Covid (LC) with an emphasis on patients' beliefs about the role of psychology. UK participants (n = 14) with either self-reported or diagnosed LC took part in semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis described three main themes: 'Living in uncertainty', 'Why should I trust you if you don't believe me?' and 'Once I know the cause people will believe me'. Transcending these themes was a tension between professional experts and experts by lived experience and a dichotomy between psychological and medical explanations. Overarching all themes was a sense that synthesising the biological and psychological components of LC could help to resolve this tension. In summary. living with LC is characterised by feeling disbelieved which can drive the rejection of psychology. Helping patients feel listened to may encourage a more positive approach to psychological support.

Long COVID lacks effective pharmaceutical treatment options. Psychedelic treatment for long COVID has received attention given anecdotal reports of neuropsychiatric symptom improvement. This study investigates the use of psilocybin for neuropsychiatric long COVID symptoms, examining online accounts of individuals with reported long COVID using psilocybin. We searched the Reddit communities, "r/LongCovid," and "r/covidlonghaulers" for terms, "psilocybin," "shrooms," and "magic mushrooms." Posts were included if they self-reported (1) neuropsychiatric symptoms of long COVID, (2) use of psilocybin, and (3) descriptions of the perceived effect or lack thereof on long COVID symptoms. Posts were manually coded to identify the nature of psilocybin ingestion, long COVID symptoms, and post's author's perceived effect on symptoms. The most common symptoms identified were fatigue (47.3%, N = 52), cognitive impairment (46.4%, N = 51), and depression (30.0%, N = 33). Of 110 posts meeting criteria, 78.2% (N = 86) reported any improvement in long COVID symptoms, while 11.8% (N = 13) reported worsening. For those with improvement, 77.9% (N = 67) reported improvement lasting beyond their acute psychedelic experience, while 5.8% (N = 5) reported improvement only during the experience. Given these findings, studies employing comparison social media data for other long COVID self-treatments and/or prospective observational studies of individuals self-treating neuropsychiatric long COVID symptoms with psychedelics may be warranted.

To study the emerging hotspot pattern of Long COVID (LC) in the U.S. population and investigate the correlation between Long COVID and state health system performance.

Using 2022 to 2024 Center for Disease Control and Prevention adult LC data, I applied the Getis-Ord Gi* statistic with the Mann-Kendall trend test to determine emerging temporal trends associated with local clustering patterns across the contiguous states. A Pearson's correlation tested LC rates and state health system performance.

A spatiotemporal trend map described discrete patterns. In 2023, Long COVID rates were highest in Southeastern states such as Mississippi and West Virginia, but by 2024, mixed patterns were observed in some states. The LC rates showed an inverse relationship with state health outcome scores (r = -0.69, P < 0.001). Emerging hotspot analysis identified Mississippi as a persistent hotspot for Long COVID. Northeastern states showed consistently persistent cold spots.

The states with better health outcomes showed a lower frequency of long COVID. The geographically emerging hot spots can guide focused intervention and resource allocation for these patients.

Objectives: To compare the health status, exercise capacity, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in survivors of COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) at 8, 12, and 24 months post-diagnosis. Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center follow-up study embedded within a larger multicenter cohort of adults with COVID-19 who required hospital admission. Eligible participants underwent clinical interviews, physical examinations, chest radiography, and the 6-min walk test (6MWT). Standardized scales were used to assess post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, depression, and HRQoL. Results: Out of 1295 patients with COVID-19, 365 developed ARDS, of whom 166 survived. After excluding deaths and loss to follow-up, 95 patients were monitored for 24 months. Over 60% of patients had persistent symptoms, though significant improvements were recorded in quality of life and physical recovery. More than 70% recovered their previous physical capacity, but 15% did not return to their usual lifestyle habits. Symptoms such as arthralgia and fatigue decreased, but cognitive issues, such as memory loss and insomnia, persisted. Radiological improvements were noted, although pulmonary function remained impaired. The prevalence of PTSD and anxiety decreased, while depression remained stable at around 30%. Conclusions: Long COVID continues to impose significant physical, mental, and social challenges. Symptoms like fatigue and anxiety have a profound impact on daily life. Strategies are urgently needed to help patients regain health and resume their normal lives.

Studies have indicated that COVID-19 infection may accelerate the aging process in organisms. However, it remains unknown whether contracting COVID-19 affects life expectancy. Furthermore, the underlying biological mechanisms behind these findings are still unclear.

We conducted a prospective cohort study on 56,504 participants of European ancestry from the UK Biobank who reported the time and number of COVID-19 infection between January 2020 and September 2023. The parental average longevity was used as a proxy for their own longevity. Linear regression was used to assess the relationship between COVID-19 infection and longevity. Furthermore, we investigated the shared genetic basis between COVID-19 and longevity using large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for COVID-19 (122,616 cases and 2,475,240 controls) and longevity (3,484 cases and 25,483 controls). Mendelian randomization (MR) and mediation analysis were utilized to assess causal relationships and potential mediators between COVID-19 susceptibility and longevity. Shared genetic loci between the two phenotypes were identified using conjunctional false discovery rate (conjFDR) statistical frameworks.

After controlling for relevant covariates, COVID-19 infection might not be significantly correlated with longevity. In all MR methods, generalized summary-data-based Mendelian randomization (GSMR) analysis revealed a significant decrease in longevity due to severe COVID-19 infection (OR = 0.91, 95%CI: 0.84-0.98, P = 0.015). Mediation analysis identified stroke and myocardial infarction as potential mediators between COVID-19 susceptibility and reduced longevity. At conjFDR < 0.05, we identified rs62062323 (KANSL1) and rs9530111 (PIBF1) as shared loci between COVID-19 and longevity.

Together, our findings provided preliminary evidence for the shared genetic basics between COVID-19 and aging. This discovery may have implications for personalized medicine and preventive strategies, helping identify individuals who may be more vulnerable to severe outcomes from COVID-19 due to their genetic makeup.

Patients with Long COVID (LC) often experience neuropsychiatric symptoms such as depression, anxiety, and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), collectively referred to as the physio-affective phenome of LC. Activated immune-inflammatory pathways and insulin resistance significantly contribute to the physio-affective phenome associated with LC.

In a cohort of 90 individuals, categorized into those with and without LC, we evaluated, 3-6 months following acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, the correlations between the Hamilton Depression (HAMD), Hamilton Anxiety (HAMA), and Fibro-Fatigue (FF) Rating Scale scores, and serum C-reactive protein (CRP), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), galanin-galanin receptor 1 (GAL-GALR1) signaling, insulin resistance, insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI1), S100B and neuron-specific enolase (NSE).

HAMD, HAMA, FF scores, CRP, PGE2, GAL-GALR1 signaling, insulin resistance, PAI1, NSE, and S100B are all higher in people with LC compared to those without LC. The HAMD/HAMA/FF scores were significantly correlated with PGE, CRP, GAL, GALR1, insulin resistance, and PAI1 levels, and a composite score based on peak body temperature (PBT) - oxygen saturation (SpO2) (PBT/SpO2 index) during the acute infectious phase. A combination of biomarkers explained a large part of the variance in CFS and affective scores (33.6%-42.0%), with GAL-GALR1 signaling, PGE2, and CRP being the top 3 most important biomarkers. The inclusion of the PBT/SpO2 index increased the prediction (55.3%-67.1%). The PBT/SpO2 index predicted the increases in GAL-GALR1 signaling.

These results indicate that the CFS and affective symptoms that are linked to LC are the consequence of metabolic aberrations, activated immune-inflammatory pathways, and the severity of inflammation during the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The benefits and challenges of electronic health records (EHRs) as data sources for clinical and epidemiologic research have been well described. However, several factors are important to consider when using EHR data to study novel, emerging, and multifaceted conditions such as postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection or long COVID. In this article, we present opportunities and challenges of using EHR data to improve our understanding of long COVID, based on lessons learned from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded RECOVER (REsearching COVID to Enhance Recovery) Initiative, and suggest steps to maximize the usefulness of EHR data when performing long COVID research.

More than 100 million people worldwide have been infected by SARS-CoV-2 virus, the virus responsible for the acute disease COVID-19. Multiple studies have shown how various symptoms in these patients can persist for several months after resolution of the acute process, a phenomenon known as post-COVID syndrome. Neurological symptoms are varied, but the great majority of patients present fatigue.

To analyse post-COVID fatigue.

We present a prospective, single-centre, case-control study comparing patients with fatigue in the context of post-COVID syndrome with patients with history of COVID-19 but without post-COVID fatigue. Data were recorded at baseline (April 2021) and at 6 months. Data were recorded on clinical variables, fatigue questionnaires, sleep disorders, depression, anxiety, cognitive impairment, and quality of life. Basic laboratory analysis was performed with blood samples collected at the 2 visits. In addition, a substudy of proinflammatory (IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokines was performed.

Fatigue as measured by the Chalder Fatigue Scale was mixed (physical and psychological) and of moderate intensity. At 6 months, physical fatigue improved, but psychological fatigue did not. Significant differences were found in sleepiness, cognitive impairment, anxiety, and quality of life. Significant alterations were observed in TNF-α levels, but not in the remaining cytokines.

Patients with fatigue presented a poorer quality of life, with an improvement being observed at 6 months, which suggests a course that may be self-limiting; however, this will have to be confirmed with longer studies.

The World Health Organization has declared the end of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) public health emergency. However, this did not indicate the end of COVID-19. Several months after the infection, numerous patients complain of respiratory or nonspecific symptoms; this condition is called long COVID. Even patients with mild COVID-19 can experience long COVID, thus the burden of long COVID remains considerable. Therefore, we conducted this study to comprehensively analyze the effects of long COVID using multi-faceted assessments.

We conducted a prospective cohort study involving patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between February 2020 and September 2021 in six tertiary hospitals in Korea. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after discharge. Long COVID was defined as the persistence of three or more COVID-19-related symptoms. The primary outcome of this study was the prevalence of long COVID after the period of COVID-19.

During the study period, 290 patients were enrolled. Among them, 54.5 and 34.6% experienced long COVID within 6 months and after more than 18 months, respectively. Several patients showed abnormal results when tested for post-traumatic stress disorder (17.4%) and anxiety (31.9%) after 18 months. In patients who underwent follow-up chest computed tomography 18 months after COVID-19, abnormal findings remained at 51.9%. Males (odds ratio [OR], 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.53; P=0.004) and elderly (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00-1.09; P=0.04) showed a significant association with long COVID after 12-18 months in a multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Many patients still showed long COVID after 18 months post SARS-CoV-2 infection. When managing these patients, the assessment of multiple aspects is necessary.

In 2019, emergence of the novel and communicable severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection took scientific communities by surprise and imposed significant burden on healthcare systems globally. Although the advent of this disease piqued the interest of academic centers, healthcare systems, and the general public, there is still much yet to be elucidated regarding epidemiology, pathophysiology, and long-term impacts of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It has been established that long COVID-19 can impact multiple organ systems, including the cardiovascular system, unfavorably. Although the pathophysiology of this damage is not well understood, adverse sequelae may range from chest pain and arrhythmias to heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction, or sudden cardiac death. For any postacute COVID-19 patient requiring a surgical procedure, the potential for cardiac injury secondary to long COVID-19 must be considered in the preoperative cardiac examination.

This literature review serves to add to the growing body of literature exploring postacute cardiovascular outcomes of COVID-19, with a focus on presurgical cardiac clearance in the adult patient. Specifically, this review studies the prevalence of cardiovascular symptomatology including chest pain, arrhythmias, blood pressure changes, myo-/pericarditis, HF, cardiomyopathy, orthostatic intolerance, and thromboembolism. Although current evidence is scarce in both quality and quantity, it is the goal that this review will highlight the negative impacts of long COVID-19 on cardiovascular health and encourage providers to be cognizant of potential sequelae in the context of the presurgical examination.

For this study, peer-reviewed and journal-published articles were selected based on established inclusion and exclusion criteria to address the question "How does long COVID-19 impact the presurgical cardiac examination of an adult scheduled to undergo a noncardiac procedure?" Inclusion criteria included human studies conducted in adult patients and published in peer-reviewed journals up until May 2024 examining the effects of long-COVID-19 infection on the cardiovascular system. Exclusion criteria eliminated unpublished reports, preprints, duplicate articles, literature regarding coronavirus strains other than COVID-19, studies regarding post-COVID-19 vaccination complications, animal studies, and studies conducted in people younger than 18 years of age. A total of 6,675 studies were retrieved from PubMed and Google Scholar. Following screening, 60 studies were included in final consideration.

Cardiovascular symptoms of postacute COVID-19 infection were encountered with the following percentages prevalence (total numbers of articles mentioning symptom/total number of articles [60]): chest pain (83.3), arrhythmias (88.3), hypertension (40.0), hypotension (16.7), myocarditis (80.0), pericarditis (51.7), HF (70.0), cardiomyopathy (55.0), orthostatic intolerance (56.7), and thromboembolic events (85.0).

The presence of persisting COVID symptoms may negatively impact the patient's physical examination, blood tests, electrocardiogram (ECG), imaging, and/or echocardiogram. Cardiac conditions associated with long COVID require special attention in the context of the presurgical candidate due to an increased risk of sudden cardiac death, myocarditis, stroke, and myocardial infarction - even in those who were healthy prior to acute COVID-19 infection. Until more specific scientific evidence comes to light, care of these patients should be viewed through the prism of the best practices already in use and clinicians should maintain a low threshold to pursue more extensive cardiac workup prior to surgery.

ObjectivesWhile most individuals infected with COVID-19 recover completely within a few weeks, some continue to experience lingering symptoms. This study was conducted to identify and describe the clinical and subclinical manifestations of adult patients from the long-term effects of COVID-19.MethodsThe study analyzed 205 medical records of inpatients (age ≥ 16 years, ≥ 4 weeks post-COVID-19 recovery, and a negative SARS-CoV-2 status at enrollment) at Thong Nhat Hospital, Vietnam, from 6 September 2021 to 26 August 2022, using R language software.ResultsThe majority of patients hospitalized with long COVID-19 symptoms (92.68%) had normal consciousness. The most common symptoms on admission were fatigue (59.02%), dyspnea (52.68%), and cough (42.93%). In total, 80% of patients observed respiratory symptoms, primarily dyspnea, while 42.44% reported neurological symptoms, with sleep disturbance being the most common. Noticeably, 42.93% of patients experienced respiratory failure in the post-COVID-19 period, resembling acute respiratory distress syndrome.DiscussionThese findings provide crucial insights into the epidemiology, clinical, and subclinical aspects of post-COVID-19 conditions, shedding light on the prevalence of common symptoms and the demographic distribution of affected patients. Understanding these manifestations is vital for patient well-being, improved clinical practice, and targeted healthcare planning, potentially leading to better patient care, management, and future interventions.

This study introduces a novel approach to understanding the impact of long COVID symptoms on daily life by integrating wearable devices to assess their influence on physical and mental quality of life, as well as perceived performance and satisfaction in daily activities.

By leveraging technology such as accelerometers and pulse oximeters alongside assessment tools like the SF-12 Health Survey, the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, and the Borg Scale, this research provides a comprehensive analysis that advances the field of occupational therapy.

An analytical observational study with 10 participants with long COVID and 10 healthy controls revealed that individuals with long COVID took significantly longer to complete tasks such as setting the table, sweeping, and climbing stairs, compared to the control group. Participants with long COVID also reported higher perceived exertion during all activities, as well as significantly worse physical health-related quality of life and lower satisfaction and performance in daily activities. Notably, perceived exertion correlated with reduced physical quality of life and diminished satisfaction and accomplishment in occupational tasks.

These findings emphasize the critical need for occupational therapy interventions to reduce perceived exertion, which could improve physical quality of life and enhance performance and satisfaction in daily activities for individuals with long COVID.