Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), a rare incurable low-grade B-cell lymphoma, exhibits heterogeneous survival outcomes. We evaluated the prognostic performance of a novel modified staging system of WM (MSS-WM) through comparison with existing models in a single-center cohort of 294 symptomatic WM patients. MSS-WM demonstrated significant stratification capacity (p < 0.0001), with 5-year overall survival rates of 89% (low-risk), 84% (low-intermediate), and 52% (intermediate/high-risk). All MSS-WM factors, including age, serum albumin, and LDH demonstrated independent prognostic impact. In addition, high beta-2 microglobulin level also showed negative prognostic impacts (p = 0.0002). While high concordance of MSS-WM and the revised IPSS (rIPSS-WM) was confirmed, the rIPSS-WM exhibited better predictive accuracy. However, MSS-WM's simplified structure enhances clinical utility, enabling rapid risk stratification: 89% 5-year survival in low-risk vs 52% in high-risk groups. This practical staging system requires no complex calculations, making it preferable for routine clinical implementation while maintaining comparable prognostic discrimination.

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare type of lymphoma, with no optimal treatment. Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors have shown promising outcomes, yet achieving deep remission (very good partial remission or complete remission) remains challenging. and time-limited therapy with proteasome inhibition has not been reported. We conducted a phase II clinical trial (NCT04463953) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining zanubrutinib, ixazomib, and dexamethasone (ZID) in patients with newly diagnosed WM.

A total of 27 patients were enrolled in the study. Patients received ZID induction therapy for up to six 28-day cycles, followed by consolidation therapy for a total of 24 cycles. The primary endpoint was the deep remission rate.

Overall, 24 of the 27 enrolled patients completed induction treatment. One patient (4.2%) achieved complete remission. Ten patients (41.6%) achieved very good partial remission. The overall, major, and deep remission rates were 100%, 95.8%, and 45.8%, respectively. The median time to response was 2 months (range, 1-5). Five of the 22 patients had a CXCR4 mutation, with no disparity in deep remission between the patients with and without a CXCR4 mutation (40% vs. 50%; P = 0.594). The median abnormal lymphocyte (7.6% vs. 1.6%; P = 0.0019) and plasma cells (0.28%-0.02%; P = 0.0306) in bone marrow were significantly reduced after treatment. The median follow-up was 30.9 months (range, 15-42). The estimated median progression-free survival and overall survival were 40 months (95% confidence interval, 35.5-44.5) and not reached, respectively, with no difference in patients with/without CXCR4 mutations. The most common adverse event was hematologic toxicity.

The ZID regimen might offer deep remission and provide a time-limited Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in patients with WM.

Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) have shown prominent clinical efficacy in patients with B cell malignancies, such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, mantle cell lymphoma, diffuse large B cell lymphoma, and Waldenström's macroglobulinemia. Nevertheless, numerous factors contribute to BTKi resistance, encompassing genetic mutations, chromosomal aberrations, dysregulation of protein expression, tumor microenvironment, and metabolic reprogramming. Accordingly, potential therapeutic strategies have been explored to surmount BTKi resistance, including noncovalent BTKi, BTK proteolysis-targeting chimeras, and combination therapies. Herein, we summarize the mechanisms responsible for BTKi resistance as well as the current preclinical and clinical strategies to address BTKi resistance in B cell malignancies treatment.

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a therapeutically validated drug target. Small-molecule inhibitors of BTK have changed the treatment paradigms of multiple B-cell malignancies and evolved over three generations to overcome clinical challenges. Four drugs are now approved by the FDA, including the first-in-class drug ibrutinib and successively approved acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib, and pirtobrutinib. The third-generation drug pirtobrutinib, which binds non-covalently to BTK, is expected to overcome resistance mutations at the covalent binding Cys481 residue of the first and second-generation drugs that covalently bind to BTK. However, some newly identified non-Cys481 resistance mutations to pirtobrutinib have shown their co-resistance to some of the covalent inhibitors, and this leaves a major unmet need that is promoting the development of next-generation BTK-targeted therapeutics. More non-covalent BTK inhibitors with differentiated binding modes are under development, and the ongoing development focus of next-generation therapeutics involves new and alternative directions to target BTK using dual-binding inhibitors and degraders of BTK, as well as its allosteric inhibitors. Recent exploration of the differentiated features of BTK inhibitors in various aspects has shown the possible link between their different features and different functional and therapeutic consequences. This review summarizes the key differentiated features of the BTK inhibitors approved by the FDA and others under development to add knowledge for their therapeutic application and future development. Long-term follow-up updates of clinical outcomes of the earlier developed drugs are also included, together with direct and indirect comparisons of efficacy and safety between the different generations of drugs. The ongoing development status of next-generation BTK-targeted therapeutics is described, with a discussion on their therapeutic potential and some limitations.

Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM) is distinguished from other indolent lymphomas by its unique molecular landscape and clinical behavior. With the emergence of new therapeutic options and improved survival rates, it has become increasingly important to balance the goal of prolonging survival with minimizing treatment-related toxicities.

This review focuses on the current therapeutic strategies for WM, emphasizing the clinical effectiveness of various agents and treatment groups and their associated toxicity profiles. Additionally, we discuss emerging therapies and combinations, which have shown encouraging preliminary results.

WM remains an incurable disease, yet its indolent nature and the growing array of therapeutic options have significantly improved outcomes in first- and subsequent-line settings. Chemoimmunotherapy and BTK inhibitors have demonstrated high efficacy and durable responses, with the latter offering a stem-cell-sparing approach. However, unlike in CLL or multiple myeloma, evidence supporting the superiority of targeted agents over chemoimmunotherapy is not available. Consequently, treatment decisions depend on patient characteristics and shared decision-making to carefully balance risks, select appropriate regimens, and encourage clinical trial participation to advance in understanding this rare disease.

Over the last decade, covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have become a standard option for treating patients with symptomatic Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM) in the frontline or relapsed settings. However, the definition of intolerance and resistance to covalent BTK inhibitors has not been established. Understanding the best approaches to managing such patients is crucial to avoiding premature abandonment of effective therapy or pursuing futile therapies unlikely to be effective in controlling symptomatic disease progression. With the advent of noncovalent BTK inhibitors and BCL2 antagonists, in addition to clinical trials evaluating phospholipid-drug conjugates, antibody-drug conjugates, and bispecific antibodies, the present Consensus Panel 5 aims to establish working definitions for intolerance and resistance to covalent BTK inhibitors, as well as provide strategies to identify and manage these issues not infrequently encountered in clinical practice.

Relevant studies have demonstrated the poor treatment outcomes and prognosis for double-expressor diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DE-DLBCL) in the rituximab era. Zanubrutinib plus R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin/liposomal doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone; ZR-CHOP) has shown efficacy in untreated non-GCB DLBCL patients with extranodal involvement. However, its efficacy in newly diagnosed DE-DLBCL remains uncertain.

This retrospective study sought to assess the efficacy and safety of ZR-CHOP in comparison to R-CHOP in treatment-naïve patients with DE-DLBCL.

This study assessed 78 patients with newly diagnosed DE-DLBCL who were admitted between June 2017 and January 2024. Among them, 55 patients received the R-CHOP regimen, while 23 patients were treated with the ZR-CHOP regimen. The clinical characteristics were well balanced between the two groups.

The complete response rates (CRR) were higher in the ZR-CHOP group than the R-CHOP group, regardless of whether patients completed 4 or 6 treatment cycles (P= 0.019; P= 0.025). ORR in the ZR-CHOP group showed a higher trend than that in the R-CHOP group (P= 0.624; P= 0.219). The median follow-up period was 23.3 months, and the predicted median progression free survival (PFS) in the R-CHOP group was 22.8 months, whereas the median PFS in the ZR-CHOP group was not reached. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates in the ZR-CHOP group showed a beneficial trend compared with the R-CHOP group, but there was no statistical difference (P= 0.072). However, the PFS of the ZR-CHOP group was longer than that of the R-CHOP group in patients with Ki67 index >75% (P= 0.034) and p53 expression >50% (P= 0.0033). The predicted median overall survival (OS) in the ZR-CHOP and R-CHOP groups were not reached. The 1-, 2- and 3-year OS rates were not significantly different between the two groups (P= 0.29). The most common adverse event in both groups was hematotoxicity, but there was no significant difference in the incidence of all adverse events between the two groups.

First-line treatment with the ZR-CHOP regimen improved CRR in the untreated patients with DE-DLBCL and prolonged PFS in the Ki67 index >75% subgroup and the p53 expression >50% subgroup.

Chemotherapy remains the primary therapeutic strategy for most tumors, particularly those at advanced stages with distant metastases and resistance to molecularly targeted therapy or immunotherapy. There are many manifestations of chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal toxicity (CIGT), including chemotherapy-induced diarrhea (CID) and chemotherapy-induced constipation (CIC). Although the World Health Organisation and the International Association Against Cancer have different grading criteria and strategies for the prevention and treatment of CIGT, there are still many unanswered questions that need to be clarified. This review critically describes pathological mechanisms and clinical research, analyzing the variability in diagnostic criteria and the absence of standardization in grading severity. We identify a critical gap in understanding the molecular underpinnings of CID and CIC and suggest targeted areas for future research, including developing personalized treatment approaches based on genetic profiling. The findings suggest a comprehensive treatment approach combining pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies to enhance life quality and treatment adherence. This review will offer a comprehensive bird-eye of pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical manifestations, and therapeutic strategies of CIGT, thereby enriching accessible references to clinicians, and helping them to prevent and control CID and CIC.

The diagnosis and treatment of Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) are the subjects of this two-part review, which aims to provide current and thorough knowledge of these topics. The first portion of the study, previously published, investigated the epidemiology, etiology, clinicopathological aspects, differential diagnosis, prognostic factors, and impact on WM-specific groups. Specifically, this second section examines both the standard consolidated method and the new therapeutic strategy to handle the complex topic of the treatment of WM.

WM has no cure, but therapies can improve survival. Treatment for WM/LPL patients should be initiated when they exhibit symptoms, and the IgM level should not determine WM treatment.Current guidelines suggest various initial personalized therapy treatments, typically chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) or BTK inhibitors (BTKi).Patients with WM can be put into three groups based on their MYD88 and CXCR4 mutational status: those with MYD88 mutations but no CXCR4 mutations (MYD88MUT/CXCR4WT), those with both MYD88 and CXCR4 mutations (MYD88MUT/CXCR4MUT) and those who do not have both MYD88 and CXCR4 mutations (MYD88WT/CXCR4WT).The objective of treatment is to alleviate symptoms and mitigate the risk of organ impairment.The timing of response evaluations, including BM, should be established on a case-by-case basis, informed by clinical and laboratory assessments.Patients with relapsed/refractory WM following chemotherapy and covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors may choose non-covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors, novel anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, BCL-2 inhibitors, or more intensive chemotherapy regimens.Patients who are younger and healthier and have not responded to both CIT and BTKi may be good candidates for an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT).Second-generation anti-CD19 CAR T cells exhibit anti-WM activity in both in vitro and in vivo settings.From 2.4% to 11% of patients with WM undergo histological transformation, predominantly to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The median duration between diagnosis and transformation is 4.6 years.WM patients have a higher risk of secondary cancers.HSV and HZV prophylaxis may be beneficial for patients needing extensive treatment. Screening for Hepatitis B is necessary. Pneumocystis jiroveci prophylaxis is highly recommended. SARS-CoV- 2 and seasonal flu vaccines should be available to all WM patients.

Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a significant cause of morbidity associated with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). The phase 3 ASPEN study compared the efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib with ibrutinib in patients with WM. This ad hoc analysis examined treatment outcomes with zanubrutinib or ibrutinib on PN symptoms associated with WM in patients enrolled in ASPEN. Logistic regression was performed between PN symptom resolution and several predictors. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was assessed using the validated European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30. Forty-nine patients with PN symptoms were included (zanubrutinib treated, n = 27; ibrutinib treated, n = 22). Overall, 35 patients (71.4%) experienced resolution of PN symptoms, with a median time to resolution of 10.1 months (range, 1-46.8). In cohort 1 (MYD88 mutation), the median time to PN symptom resolution was 4.6 months (range, 1.1-46.8) with zanubrutinib and 14.1 months (range, 1-44) with ibrutinib. Logistic regression demonstrated a significant relationship between PN symptom resolution and both major response and lower baseline anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibody levels. Patients with PN symptom resolution had greater improvement in HRQOL. Physical functioning improved in patients with PN symptom resolution and was unchanged in patients without resolution. Improvements observed in PN symptoms may be in response to a reduction in immunoglobulin M. Although further investigation is required, this analysis supports the potential use and further exploration of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors to treat PN symptoms in patients with WM. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03053440.

Cardio-oncology is an emerging multidisciplinary field intended to mitigate and manage cardiovascular side effects and risks associated with cancer therapies. Clinician awareness of drug interaction management among cancer treatments, cardiovascular medications, and supportive care agents is important for optimizing efficacy and safety. Historically, chemotherapies have been associated with pharmacodynamic interactions with few, but important, pharmacokinetic interactions. The advent of oral targeted inhibitors has introduced more complex pharmacokinetic interactions, especially via cytochrome P450 pathways. Given the accelerated development of oncology therapies, clinicians need to be familiar with reviewing multiple sources for interaction information as well as adjusting and monitoring regimens when contending with drug interaction challenges.

A 75-year-old man with blurred vision and nasal bleeding was diagnosed with hyperviscosity syndrome and central retinal vein occlusion secondary to Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Serum total protein and IgM levels were undetectable. Because of the severe symptoms, we determined that immediate plasma-exchange treatment was required to decrease the blood viscosity. The initial plasma exchange was performed using the membrane isolation method with a predilution standby. A saline predilution replacement was prepared to decrease the total membrane pressure (TMP); however, the predilution protocol was not used because the planned treatment volume could be achieved without increasing the TMP. After two consecutive days of membrane plasma exchange, all serum biochemical tests were measurable, and IgM was below 4000 mg/dL. After chemotherapy, his visual symptoms improved, and he was discharged. Since it is difficult to assess the risk of elevated TMP prior to initial plasma exchange, membrane plasma exchange with a predilution standby may be a useful strategy for initial plasma exchange for hyperviscosity syndrome in terms of safety and efficiency.

Waldenström macroglobulinemia is an indolent B-cell lymphoma which although remains incurable, there are a lot of treatment options. Today, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors have a central role in the management of the disease either as monotherapy or combination with other regimens, due to their efficacy, ease of administration, and safety profile. However, there is still active clinical investigation to further increase their efficacy and improve safety profile. Combinations based on BTK inhibitors may offer advantages. Second- and third-generation BTK inhibitors are also evaluated in combinations aiming to improve the depth of response, overcome genetic factors associated with poorer outcomes and reduce toxicity and duration of therapy.

Clinical trials in cancer are ideally built on a foundation of sound mechanistic rationale and well-validated drug activity in relevant disease models. The screening of approved and investigational drugs in cell-based phenotypic assays can provide evidence of drug activity, but alternative screening paradigms are needed to develop and optimize multidrug combination regimens. Here, we utilize in vitro screening outcomes across a panel of lymphoma cell lines to dissect the activity of four small-molecule drugs (Venetoclax, Ibrutinib, Prednisolone, and Lenalidomide) currently under investigation within ongoing clinical trials in lymphoma. Data from multiple concentration ranges and time points show that synergistic drug combinations promote apoptosis and cytotoxicity responses at concentrations and time points that are consistent with in vivo drug exposures. To fully map the interaction landscape of these agents in relevant cell models, we developed an in vitro assay format that facilitated time-course evaluations involving concurrent multidrug exposure which further highlighted rapid, synergistic apoptosis induction as a central engine for the activity of this multicomponent targeted therapy. In addition to several instances of exceptional drug+drug synergy, the genetically similar diffuse large B cell lymphoma models also displayed substantial heterogeneity in the degree of synergism between drug pairs. A parallel survey of chemotherapies exhibited limited combination benefit, supporting recent findings that multicomponent chemotherapy outcomes are driven by individual drug activity. Collectively, these data demonstrate how in vitro drug screening data can identify multidrug combinations that exploit drug synergy to overcome the functional diversity of human malignancies.

The optimal therapeutic approach for relapsed/refractory (R/R) Waldenström's Macroglobulinaemia (WM) has not been clearly defined, especially after treatment with chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) and covalent Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (cBTKi). The PembroWM trial is a multi-centre, phase II, single-arm study assessing the safety, tolerability and efficacy of rituximab with pembrolizumab in R/R WM patients who had received at least one prior line of treatment, with all having relapsed post-CIT and most also exposed to cBTKi. A total of 17 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 70, and median of three prior lines of therapy with 15 either refractory or intolerant of a cBTKi. A significant proportion was identified as genomically high risk with BTKC481, CXCR4 and MYD88 L265P wild-type aberrations. Twenty-four-week overall response rate was 50% (60% CI 39.3%-60.7%), and median duration of response was 11.6 months (IQR: 6.3-17). The median progression-free survival was 13.6 months (95% CI 3-19.8), and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Treatment was well tolerated, with minimal numbers of immune-mediated AEs typically seen with checkpoint inhibitors. PembroWM is the first study to evaluate the feasibility of PD-1 axis modulation in WM and has shown that in combination with Rituximab the combination is safe and deliverable.

Waldenström macroglobulinemia is a rare non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) characterized by lymphoplasmacytic bone marrow infiltration associated with an immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal gammopathy. Over the past two decades, a number of important novel therapies have emerged for the treatment of relapsed and refractory (R/R) WM. The purpose of this review is to discuss these novel agents.

Chemoimmunotherapy which formed the basis treatment for R/R WM is slowly being replaced by novel targeted agents. These therapies, including Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, proteasome inhibitors, and B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors, have widened the landscape of management. Emerging therapies currently under investigation, such as bispecific T-cell engagers, chimeric antigen T-cell receptor therapy, and novel small molecule inhibitors, have additionally shown the potential to improve response and survival. The treatment of R/R WM has greatly evolved, in large part due to a greater understanding of the biology of WM, and the evaluation of novel targeted agents in the basket trials of NHL, showing early activity in the small WM cohorts. Combination regimens with these established and emerging novel therapies have the potential to further improve disease control and induce higher rates of deep responses. Strategies aimed at altering the disease trajectory would require randomized controlled trials to provide relevant data on optimal integration and sequencing of more effective and tolerable regimens earlier in the disease course.

Adverse events of atrial fibrillation (AF) have been commonly reported in lymphoma patients in treating Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi). The incidence rate of AF can vary depending on the specific types of BTKi and the patient population. Totally 45 published studies have revealed that the overall incidence rate of AF is 5% (95% CI 4%-7%). By performing a subtype single-rate analysis, the second-generation BTKi shows a lower AF incidence rate and lower cardiovascular toxicity. In the subtype single-rate analysis, we conclude the different AF incidence rates of Ibrutinib (10%, 95% CI 7%-13%), Acalabrutinib (4%, 95% CI 1%-6%), Orelabrutinib (0%, 95% CI 0%-1%), and Zanubrutinib (0%, 95% CI 0%-1%). The comprehensive analysis of AF inspires us to better predict and manage AF and other cardiovascular events in treating lymphoma. Meticulous evaluation, collaboration between cardiologists and hematologists, and discovery of new biomarkers are essential for its management.

Patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) have disparate outcomes. Newer therapies have emerged since the development of International Prognostic Scoring System, and MYD88L265P mutation is now frequently assessed at diagnosis, warranting reexamination of the prognostic parameters.

We reviewed records of 889 treatment-naïve patients with active WM, consecutively seen between January 01, 1996, and December 31, 2017, to identify clinical predictors of overall survival (OS) in univariate analyses. Patients with complete data for the parameters significant on the univariate analyses (n = 341) were included in a multivariable analysis to derive a prognostic model, subsequently validated in a multi-institutional cohort.

In the derivation cohort (n = 341), age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.9 [95% CI, 1.2 to 2.1]; P = .0009), serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) above upper limit of normal (HR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.3 to 4.5]; P = .007), and serum albumin <3.5 g/dL (HR, 1.5 [95% CI, 0.99 to 2.3]; P = .056) were independently prognostic. By assigning a score of 1 point each to albumin <3.5 g/dL (HR, 1.5) and age 66-75 years (HR 1.4) and 2 points for age >75 years (HR, 2.6) or elevated LDH (HR, 2.3), four groups with distinct outcomes were observed on the basis of the composite scores. Five-year OS was 93% for the low-risk (score 0), 82% for low-intermediate risk (score 1), 69% for intermediate-risk (score 2), and 55% for the high-risk (score ≥3; P < .0001) groups. In the validation cohort (N = 335), the model maintained its prognostic value, with a 5-year OS of 93%, 90%, 75%, and 57% for the four groups, respectively (P < .0001).

Modified Staging System for WM (MSS-WM), utilizing age, albumin, and LDH is a simple, clinically useful, and externally validated prognostic model that reliably risk-stratifies patients with symptomatic WM into four groups with distinct prognosis.

Published research suggests that patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are neither commonly collected nor reported in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for solid tumors. Little is known about these practices in RCTs for hematological malignant neoplasms.

To evaluate the prevalence of PROs as prespecified end points in RCTs of hematological malignant neoplasms, and to assess reporting of PROs in associated trial publications.

All issues of 8 journals known for publishing high-impact RCTs (NEJM, Lancet, Lancet Hematology, Lancet Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Blood, JAMA, and JAMA Oncology) between January 1, 2018, and December 13, 2022, were searched for primary publications of therapeutic phase 3 trials for adults with hematological malignant neoplasms. Studies that evaluated pretransplant conditioning regimens, graft-vs-host disease treatment, or radiotherapy as experimental treatment were excluded. Data regarding trial characteristics and PROs were extracted from manuscripts and trial protocols. Univariable analyses assessed associations between trial characteristics and PRO collection or reporting.

Ninety RCTs were eligible for analysis. PROs were an end point in 66 (73%) trials: in 1 trial (1%) as a primary end point, in 50 (56%) as a secondary end point, and in 15 (17%) as an exploratory end point. PRO data were reported in 26 of 66 primary publications (39%): outcomes were unchanged in 18 and improved in 8, with none reporting worse PROs with experimental treatment. Trials sponsored by for-profit entities were more likely to include PROs as an end point (49 of 55 [89%] vs 17 of 35 [49%]; P < .001) but were not significantly more likely to report PRO data (20 of 49 [41%] vs 6 of 17 [35%]; P = .69). Compared with trials involving lymphoma (18 of 29 [62%]) or leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (18 of 28 [64%]), those involving plasma cell disorders or multiple myeloma (27 of 30 [90%]) or myeloproliferative neoplasms (3 of 3 [100%]) were more likely to include PROs as an end point (P = .03). Similarly, compared with trials involving lymphoma (3 of 18 [17%]) or leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (5 of 18 [28%]), those involving plasma cell disorders or multiple myeloma (16 of 27 [59%]) or myeloproliferative neoplasms (2 of 3 [67%]) were more likely to report PROs in the primary publication (P = .01).

In this systematic review, almost 3 of every 4 therapeutic RCTs for blood cancers collected PRO data; however, only 1 RCT included PROs as a primary end point. Moreover, most did not report resulting PRO data in the primary publication and when reported, PROs were either better or unchanged, raising concern for publication bias. This analysis suggests a critical gap in dissemination of data on the lived experiences of patients enrolled in RCTs for hematological malignant neoplasms.

First-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, ibrutinib, has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular toxicities. Zanubrutinib is a more selective, next-generation BTK inhibitor. In this analysis, incidence rates of atrial fibrillation, symptomatic (grade ≥2) ventricular arrhythmia, and hypertension were evaluated in a pooled analysis of 10 clinical studies with zanubrutinib monotherapy in patients (N = 1550) with B-cell malignancies and a pooled analysis of head-to-head studies comparing zanubrutinib with ibrutinib (ASPEN cohort 1; ALPINE). Among the 10 studies, most patients (median age, 67 years) were male (66.3%) and had CLL/SLL (60.5%). Overall incidence and exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIR) for atrial fibrillation, symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia, and hypertension were lower with zanubrutinib than ibrutinib. Despite a similar prevalence of preexisting cardiovascular events in ASPEN and ALPINE, atrial fibrillation/flutter incidence rates (6.1% vs 15.6%) and EAIR (0.2 vs 0.64 persons per 100 person-months; P < .0001) were lower with zanubrutinib than with ibrutinib. Symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia incidence was low for both zanubrutinib (0.7%) and ibrutinib (1.7%) with numerically lower EAIR (0.02 vs 0.06 persons per 100 person-months, respectively) for zanubrutinib. The hypertension EAIR was lower with zanubrutinib than ibrutinib in ASPEN but similar between treatment arms in ALPINE. The higher hypertension EAIR in ALPINE was inconsistent with other zanubrutinib studies. However, fewer discontinuations (1 vs 14) and deaths (0 vs 6) due to cardiac disorders occurred with zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib in ALPINE. These data support zanubrutinib as a treatment option with improved cardiovascular tolerability compared with ibrutinib for patients with B-cell malignancies in need of BTK inhibitors. These trials were registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as # NCT03053440, NCT03336333, NCT03734016, NCT04170283, NCT03206918, NCT03206970, NCT03332173, NCT03846427, NCT02343120, and NCT03189524.

Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) are targeted treatments for B-cell tumors but have significant side effects. This study assesses and contrasts the side effects of BTKis alone and its four combination therapies.

The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was used to analyze the data on three BTKis monotherapies and combinations of ibrutinib with rituximab, obinutuzumab, venetoclax, and lenalidomide in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database up to December 2022.

We analyzed the top 20 PTs for each treatment regimen. In monotherapies, atrial fibrillation (ROR (95% CI): 9.88 (9.47-10.32)) in zanubrutinib and rash (6.97 (5.42-8.98)) in acalabrutinib had higher associations. In combinations, infection (6.86 (6.11-7.70)), atrial fibrillation (27.96 (22.61-34.58)) and myelosuppression (10.09 (8.89-11.46)) were vital signals when ibrutinib was combined with obinutuzumab, and pyrexia (4.22 (2.57-6.93)) had a high signal value when combined with lenalidomide. Hemorrhage had a lower signal value when combined with venetoclax compared to ibrutinib alone (2.50 (2.18-2.87) vs 3.60 (3.52-3.68)).

The ibrutinib-obinutuzumab combo has the highest risk of infection, atrial fibrillation, and myelosuppression, and the ibrutinib-lenalidomide combo has the highest risk of pyrexia. However, the ibrutinib-venetoclax combo has a lower risk of hemorrhage than monotherapy.

Clinical management of Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia has seen major progress in the recent years, triggered by our improved understanding of the biology of the disease and the development of new therapies. Based on this there are multiple treatment options available for patients with WM ranging from classical immunochemotherapy to targeted approaches blocking key enzymes involved in lymphoma growth. This review summarizes our current knowledge about diagnostics and treatment of this rare but recurrent lymphoma subtype, which often presents a major clinical challenge in daily clinical life.

Imbalances in protein and noncoding RNA levels in vivo lead to the occurrence of many diseases. In addition to the use of small molecule inhibitors and agonists to restore these imbalances, recently emerged targeted degradation technologies provide a new direction for disease treatment. Targeted degradation technology directly degrades target proteins or RNA by utilizing the inherent degradation pathways, thereby eliminating the functions of pathogenic proteins (or RNA) to treat diseases. Compared with traditional therapies, targeted degradation technology which avoids the principle of traditional inhibitor occupation drive, has higher efficiency and selectivity, and widely expands the range of drug targets. It is one of the most promising and hottest areas for future drug development. Herein, we systematically introduced the in vivo degradation systems applied to degrader design: ubiquitin-proteasome system, lysosomal degradation system, and RNA degradation system. We summarized the development progress, structural characteristics, and limitations of novel chimeric design technologies based on different degradation systems. In addition, due to the lack of clear ligand-binding pockets, about 80% of disease-associated proteins cannot be effectively intervened with through traditional therapies. We deeply elucidated how to use targeted degradation technology to discover and design molecules for representative undruggable targets including transcription factors, small GTPases, and phosphatases. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive and systematic overview of targeted degradation technology-related research advances and a new guidance for the chimeric design of undruggable targets.

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have revolutionized the landscape for the treatment of hematological malignancies, solid tumors, and, recently, autoimmune disorders. The BTK receptor is expressed in several hematopoietic cells such as macrophages, neutrophils, mast cells, and osteoclasts. Similarly, the BTK receptor is involved in signaling pathways such as chemokine receptor signaling, Toll-like receptor signaling, and Fc receptor signaling. Due to their unique mechanism, these agents provide a diverse utility in a variety of disease states not limited to the field of malignant hematology and are generally well-tolerated.

Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare malignant B cell lymphoma which occurs in around 1-2% of all hematologic tumors. Ibrutinib was approved in China for WM on the basis of two global pivotal studies which enrolled no Chinese patients. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of ibrutinib in Chinese patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) WM.

This was an open-label, single-arm, multicenter phase 4 study conducted across five sites in China. Enrolled patients with clinicopathological confirmed WM received ibrutinib 420 mg once daily orally until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was major response rate (MRR, partial response [PR], or better) according to the modified consensus criteria from the Sixth International Workshop on WM.

Seventeen patients were enrolled; at data cutoff (March 19, 2022), MRR was 64.7% (90% confidence interval [CI] 42.0-83.4) and overall response rate was 100% (90% CI 83.8-100.0). One (5.9%) patient achieved very good PR, 10 (58.8%) achieved PR, and six (35.3%) achieved minor response. The median duration of response (PR or better) was 14.8 months (95% CI 10.8-not estimable [NE]). Median progression-free survival was 18.4 months (95% CI 12.9-NE). All patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) related to the study drug, and grade ≥ 3 TEAEs were reported in 13 (76.5%) patients. There were no TEAEs leading to dose reduction or death. The median model estimated maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve during 24 h after dosing at steady state were 40.5 ng/mL and 204 ng·h/mL, respectively.

Ibrutinib demonstrated durable responses in Chinese patients with r/r WM. Treatment was well tolerated with no new safety signals compared with the pivotal global studies. Ibrutinib exposure was also comparable between Chinese and non-Chinese patients.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04042376.

Data on the risk of invasive fungal infections (IFI) with ibrutinib treatment are scarce.

This study aimed to determine IFI incidence and risk factors in ibrutinib-treated patients in real-life settings.

We constituted a cohort of ibrutinib incident users in the French National Healthcare Database. All patients ≥18 years with a first dispensing of ibrutinib between 21 November 2014 and 31 December 2019 were included. Patients were followed from the cohort entry date until IFI, ibrutinib discontinuation, death, or 31 December 2020, whichever came first. The cumulative incidence function method was used to estimate the probability of IFI accounting for competing risk of death. A multivariate cause-specific Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess independent IFI risk factors.

Among 6937 ibrutinib-treated patients, 1-year IFI cumulative incidence was 1.3%, with invasive aspergillosis being the most frequent. Allogenic or autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) (hazard ratio [HR] 3.59, 95% confidence interval [1.74; 7.41]), previous anticancer treatment (HR 2.12, CI 95% [1.34; 3.35]) and chronic respiratory disease (HR 1.66, [1.03; 2.67]) were associated with higher risk of IFI. Besides neutropenia and corticosteroids, use of anti-CD20 agents was significantly more frequent in patients having experienced IFI (HR 3.68, [1.82; 7.45]).

In addition to patients with ASCT history, severe neutropenia or treated with corticosteroids, our findings support active surveillance of IFIs in those with chronic respiratory disease, previously treated, or treated with anti-CD20 agents in combination with ibrutinib. Further studies are needed to optimise IFI prophylaxis in these patient subgroups.

Despite the early success of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors in the treatment of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), these single-target drug therapies have limitations in their clinical applications, such as drug resistance. Several alternative strategies have been developed, including the use of dual inhibitors, to maximize the therapeutic potential of these drugs.

Recently, the pharmacological activity of KIN-8194 was repurposed to serve as a 'dual-target' inhibitor of BTK and Hematopoietic Cell Kinase (HCK). However, the structural dual inhibitory mechanism remains unexplored, hence the aim of this study.

Conducting predictive pharmacokinetic profiling of KIN-8194, as well as demonstrating a comparative structural mechanism of inhibition against the above-mentioned enzymes.

Our results revealed favourable binding affinities of -20.17 kcal/mol, and -35.82 kcal/mol for KIN-8194 towards HCK and BTK, respectively. Catalytic residues Arg137/174 and Lys42/170 in BTK and Arg303 and Lys75/173/244/247 in HCK were identified as crucial mediators of the dual binding mechanism of KIN-8194, corroborated by high per-residue energy contributions and consistent high-affinity interactions of these residues. Prediction of the pharmacokinetics and physicochemical properties of KIN-8194 further established its inhibitory potential, evidenced by the favourable absorption, metabolism, excretion, and minimal toxicity properties. Structurally, KIN-8194 impacted the stability, flexibility, solvent-accessible surface area, and rigidity of BTK and HCK, characterized by various alterations observed in the bound and unbound structures, which proved enough to disrupt their biological function.

These structural insights provided a baseline for the understanding of the dual inhibitory activity of KIN- 8194. Establishing the cruciality of the interactions between the KIN-8194 and Arg and Lys residues could guide the structure-based design of novel dual BTK/HCK inhibitors with improved therapeutic activities.

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a unique CD20+, B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, characterized by lymphoplasmacytic infiltration of the bone marrow and circulating monoclonal immunoglobulin M. The clinical manifestations and outcomes of patients are highly variable. High-level evidence supports integration of monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab, to the chemotherapy backbone to treat WM. However, its contemporary management has become more nuanced, with deeper understanding of the pathophysiology and incorporation of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors to the treatment paradigm. Prior knowledge of the patients' MYD88L265P and CXCR4 mutation status may aid in the treatment decision-making. Currently, the two frequently utilized approaches include fixed-duration chemoimmunotherapy and BTK inhibitor-based continuous treatment until progression. Randomized trials comparing these two vastly divergent approaches are lacking. Recent studies demonstrating efficacy of B cell lymphoma-2 (BCL2) inhibitors and non-covalent BTK inhibitors in patients, previously exposed to a covalent BTK inhibitor, are a testament to the rapidly expanding options against WM.

Data regarding the safety of co-administration of ibrutinib with anticoagulants in real-life settings are scarce. Using a nationwide database, we conducted a nested case-control study in a cohort of new users of ibrutinib to assess the risk of clinically relevant bleeding (CRB) associated with anticoagulation. Cases were patients with a diagnosis of CRB, defined as hospitalization with a diagnosis of bleeding. The date of CRB constituted the index date. Up to four controls were matched on sex, age at index date and duration of follow-up. The risk of CRB associated with anticoagulation in patients receiving ibrutinib was estimated using conditional logistic regression models, providing odds ratios (OR) adjusted for risk factors of bleeding. Among 614 cases and 2407 matched controls, the risk of CRB was significantly higher in patients receiving both ibrutinib and anticoagulants (adjusted OR [aOR] 2.54, confidence interval [CI] 95% [1.94; 3.32]). When considering anticoagulant class, aOR was 1.99 (CI 95% [1.19; 3.33]) for VKA, 2.48 (CI 95% [1.76; 3.47]) for direct oral anticoagulants and 3.40 (CI 95% [2.01; 5.75]) for parenteral anticoagulants. In conclusion, this study found a 2.5-fold increased risk of CRB in patients receiving both ibrutinib and anticoagulants in real-life settings, and similar aOR among oral anticoagulants.

In recent years, Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have provided significant advances in the treatment of patients with B-cell malignancies. Ibrutinib was the first BTK inhibitor to be approved, and it changed the standard-of-care treatment for diseases such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, mantle cell lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, and Waldenström macroglobulinemia, improving efficacy outcomes and safety compared to chemotherapy. In this article, we review the development of zanubrutinib, a next-generation BTK inhibitor, from molecular design to patient-related outcomes. We start this journey by providing insights into the discovery of BTK and the physiologic, genetic, and molecular characterization of patients lacking this kinase, together with the brief treatment landscape in the era of chemo-immunotherapies. Zanubrutinib was originally developed by applying a structure-activity strategy to enhance the specificity as well as enzymatic and pharmacokinetic properties. Preclinical studies confirmed greater specificity and better bioavailability of zanubrutinib compared with that of ibrutinib, which supported the initiation of clinical trials in humans. Preliminary clinical results indicated activity in B-cell malignancies together with an improved safety profile, in line with less off-target effects described in the preclinical studies. The clinical program of zanubrutinib has since expanded significantly, with ongoing studies in a wide range of hemato-oncological diseases and in combination with many other therapies. Zanubrutinib currently is approved for various B-cell malignancies in multiple countries. This story highlights the importance of multidisciplinary collaborative research, from bench to bedside, and provides an example of how the commitment to finding improved treatment options should always run parallel to patient care.

Rituximab-based chemo-immunotherapy is currently the standard first-line treatment for Waldenstrom macroglobulinaemia (WM), while ibrutinib has emerged as an alternative. In the absence of randomised trials (RCTs) comparing these regimens, the optimal first-line treatment for WM remains uncertain. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to assess the efficacy and safety of first-line treatment regimens for WM. We searched key databases from January 2007 to March 2023, including phase II and III trials, including treatment-naïve WM patients treated with rituximab-based regimens or ibrutinib. Response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities were evaluated. Four phase III and seven phase II trials were included among 736 unique records. Pooled response rates from all comparative and non-comparative trials were 46%, 33% and 26% for bendamustine rituximab (BR), bortezomib-dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, rituximab (BDRC) and ibrutinib rituximab (IR), respectively. Two-year pooled PFS was 89%, 81% and 82% with BR, BDRC and IR, respectively. Neuropathy was more frequent with bortezomib, while haematologic and cardiac toxicities were more common with chemo-immunotherapy and ibrutinib-based regimens respectively. Our findings suggest that BR yields higher response rates than bortezomib or ibrutinib-based combinations. RCTs comparing BR against emerging therapies, including novel Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors, are warranted.

Hepatitis due to hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation can be serious and potentially fatal, but is preventable. HBV reactivation is most commonly reported in patients receiving chemotherapy, especially rituximab-containing therapy for hematological malignancies and those receiving stem cell transplantation. Patients with inactive and even resolved HBV infection still have persistence of HBV genomes in the liver. The expression of these silent genomes is controlled by the immune system. Suppression or ablation of immune cells, most importantly B cells, may lead to reactivation of seemingly resolved HBV infection. Thus, all patients with hematological malignancies receiving anticancer therapy should be screened for active or resolved HBV infection by blood tests for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen. Patients found to be positive for HBsAg should be given prophylactic antiviral therapy. For patients with resolved HBV infection, there are two approaches. The first is pre-emptive therapy guided by serial HBV DNA monitoring, and treatment with antiviral therapy as soon as HBV DNA becomes detectable. The second approach is prophylactic antiviral therapy, particularly for patients receiving high-risk therapy, especially anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Entecavir and tenofovir are the preferred antiviral choices. Many new effective therapies for hematological malignancies have been introduced in the past decade, for example, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy, novel monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibody drug conjugates, and small molecule inhibitors, which may be associated with HBV reactivation. Although there is limited evidence to guide the optimal preventive measures, we recommend antiviral prophylaxis in HBsAg-positive patients receiving novel treatments, including Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors, and CAR-T cell therapy. Further studies are needed to determine the risk of HBV reactivation with these agents and the best prophylactic strategy.

Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is an immunoglobulin M monoclonal gammopathy produced by a bone marrow lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, an indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma in which the cure is still an unmet challenge. Combinations with alkylating agents, purine analogs, and monoclonal antibodies, Bruton tyrosine kinase, and proteasome inhibitors are used for the treatment of relapsed and refractory patients. Moreover, new additional agents can be seen on the horizon as potential effective therapies. No consensus on a preferred treatment in the relapsed setting is available yet.

Despite substantial progress in the clinical management of Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM) and the emergence of chemotherapy-free approaches such as BTK inhibitors, WM is still a disease in which current treatments fail to cure and are in part associated with significant toxicities, compromising treatment outcome and quality of life. Thus, the vision for future front-line therapy should be to develop regimens which combine improved efficacy and excellent applicability with a low toxicity profile. Conventional immunochemotherapy such as bendamustine-rituximab is highly active but limited by hematotoxicity and long-lasting immunosuppression. Thus, further intensification of this treatment concept will most likely not be successful. Chemotherapy-free approaches such as BTK inhibitors have already changed the treatment landscape in WM, but still have major limitations such as the need for non-fixed duration treatment. Most probably, the combination of non-chemotherapy based, targeted approaches with different modes of action will ensure that we at least come closer to our vision of achieving functional cure in WM in the near future.

The discovery of MYD88 (L265P) mutation led to investigating BTK inhibitors in Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). Ibrutinib, the first-in-class agent, was approved based on a phase II trial in relapsed/refractory patients. In the phase III iNNOVATE study, the combination of rituximab and ibrutinib was compared with rituximab and placebo in treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory patients. Second-generation BTK inhibitor, zanubrutinib, was compared with Ibrutinib in MYD88-mutated WM patients in the phase III ASPEN trial, whereas acalabrutinib was investigated in a phase II trial. Here, we discuss the role of BTK inhibitors in treatment-naïve patients with WM based on currently available evidence.

Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is defined as a lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) with immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal gammopathy and morphologic evidence of bone marrow infiltration by LPL. Immunophenotyping and genotyping provide a firm pathological basis for diagnosis and are particularly valuable in differential diagnosis between WM and related diseases. Emerging technologies in mutational analysis present new opportunities, but challenges remain around standardization of methodologies and reporting of mutational data across centers.

The review provides an overview of the diagnosis of WM, with a particular focus on the role of immunophenotyping and genotyping.

Demonstration of LPL with a bone marrow biopsy is essential to reach a definitive diagnosis of WM. However, MYD88L265P and a typical WM immunophenotypic profile are valuable for the differential diagnosis of WM and related diseases, such as marginal zone lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. These methodologies must be utilized across centers and with appropriate standards followed in the evaluation and reporting of sensitivities and specificities. The diagnostic and/or prognostic value of mutations in genes such as CXCR4 and TP53 that are currently not routinely evaluated in the diagnosis of WM should be explored.

The efficacy of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) remains suboptimal in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treatment. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the outcomes of combining anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) with BTKi therapy versus BTKi monotherapy for patients with CLL. We searched for relevant studies in the Pubmed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases until December 2022. We estimated the effective results using a hazard ratio (HR) for survival outcomes and relative risk (RR) for response outcomes and safety. Four randomized controlled trials (including 1056 patients) were found until November 2022 and fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Progression-free survival was significantly improved with the addition of anti-CD20 mAb to BTKi over BTKi (HR 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-0.97), whereas pooled analysis of overall survival did not favor combination therapy compared to BTKi monotherapy (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.50-1.04). Combination therapy was related to a statistically better complete response (RR, 2.03; 95% CI 1.01 to 4.06) and an undetectable minimal residual disease rate (RR, 6.43; 95% CI 3.54 to 11.67). The risk of grade ≥ 3 adverse events was comparable between the two groups (RR, 1.08; (95% CI 0.80 to 1.45). Overall, adding anti-CD20 mAb to BTKi revealed superior efficacy than BTKi alone in untreated or previously treated CLL patients without affecting the safety of single-agent BTKi. Conducting further randomized studies to confirm our results and determine the optimal therapy for managing patients with CLL is essential.

Hypoproliferative anemia is a frequently encountered adverse event in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Secondary pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) is a rare but recognized immune related adverse event. With the burgeoning use of ICIs, the association of secondary PRCA with an underlying lymphoproliferative disorder is often overlooked.

We report a case of a 67-year-old non-Hispanic Caucasian male with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer, who developed severe transfusion dependent anemia with reticulocytopenia while receiving treatment with olaparib and pembrolizumab. His bone marrow findings demonstrated erythroid hypoplasia, in addition to a CD5-negative, CD10-negative monotypic B-cell population and a somatic MYD88L265P mutation. With a presence of an IgM-paraprotein, he was diagnosed with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) with secondary PRCA and treated with 6 cycles of bendamustine and rituximab. He achieved a complete response with this regimen and was transfusion independent.

In this case, underlying WM was uncovered through systematic investigation of anemia caused by ICI therapy. This report highlights the possibility of a lymphoproliferative disorder in patients with concerns for PRCA with prior ICI exposure. If identified, treating the underlying lymphoproliferative disorder is highly efficacious in the management of the secondary PRCA.

Ibrutinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for multiple B-cell malignancies, including Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia in 2014. Although the drug portends favorable outcomes, it also bears a profile of side effects. Current literature describes only two cases of nonhemorrhagic pericardial effusion associated with ibrutinib use, and here we present the third. This case recounts an episode of serositis causing pericardial and pleural effusions and diffuse edema after eight years of maintenance ibrutinib for Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM).

A 90-year-old male with WM and atrial fibrillation presented to the emergency department for a week of progressive periorbital and upper and lower extremity edema, dyspnea, and gross hematuria, despite increasing at-home diuretic dose. The patient was on 140 mg ibrutinib twice daily. Labs showed stable creatinine, serum IgMs of 97, and negative serum and urine protein electrophoresis. Imaging revealed bilateral pleural effusions and pericardial effusion with impending tamponade. All other workup was unrevealing, diuretics were ceased, pericardial effusion was monitored with serial echocardiograms, and ibrutinib was exchanged for low-dose prednisone.

After five days, the effusions and edema dissipated, hematuria resolved, and patient was discharged. Resumption of lower dose ibrutinib one month later led to a subsequent return of edema, which again subsided with cessation. Reevaluation of maintenance therapy continues outpatient.

Patients on ibrutinib presenting with dyspnea and edema should be monitored for pericardial effusion; the drug should be held in exchange for anti-inflammatory therapy, and future management should involve cautious, low-dose resumption, or exchange for alternative therapy.