Hemangiomas represent 3% of all benign esophageal tumors. Conventional esophagectomy is the standard treatment with its invasive nature and possible surgical complications. Now, less invasive techniques are used with better results. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is one of the novel noninvasive methods used for en bloc removal of tumors. No available data about the use of ESD in removing esophageal hemangioma. Here, we studied the validity and safety of ESD as a minimally invasive procedure to remove esophageal hemangioma.

Three patients were diagnosed with esophageal hemangioma and underwent ESD with en bloc resection. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was performed before ESD to better evaluate the layer of origin and vascularity and guard against perforation. Patients were followed up postintervention to document possible complications.

Among the 3 studied patients, one presented with chronic abdominal pain, the second was complaining of dysphagia, and the third patient was diagnosed accidentally. Pathology reports confirmed the diagnosis of hemangiomas in all cases with no atypia and complete removal of the lesions. No complications were reported during the procedure or over the follow-up period.

ESD is a proper, minimally invasive method with good en bloc resection that can be used in cases of esophageal hemangiomas.

With the development of endoscopic techniques, endoscopic therapy began to play an important role in the management of esophageal hemangiomas.

A large esophageal submucosal tumor (2.5 cm), which was suspected to be an esophageal hemangioma, was diagnosed in a 50-year-old woman.

Esophageal hemangioma INTERVENTIONS:: Endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed for tumor removal.

Histopathological results revealed hemangioma. No complication or recurrence was observed in the 17-month follow-up period.

Our successful experience showed that endoscopic submucosal dissection is an effective and a safe approach to treat large esophageal hemangiomas (2.5 cm).

A 58-year-old male was diagnosed esophageal hemangioma during a endoscopy in regular examination. The patient was referred to the department of gastroenterology in our hospital to treatment. Combined endoscopic band ligation (EBL) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) was performed for diagnostic treatment. Histopathological results revealed hemangioma. Even though several approaches such as esophagectomy, endoscopic removal, sclerotherapy, and laser therapy have been used to remove the esophageal hemangiomas, recently less invasive methods were preferred. Here we describe a case of esophageal hemangioma removed by EBL & EMR.

Benign esophageal and paraesophageal masses and cysts are a rare but important group of pathologies. Although often asymptomatic, these lesions can cause a variety of symptoms and, in some cases, demonstrate variable biological behavior. Contemporary categorization relies heavily on endoscopic ultrasound and other imaging modalities and immunohistochemical analysis when appropriate. Minimally invasive options including endoscopic, laparoscopic, and thoracoscopic methods are increasingly used for symptomatic or indeterminate lesions.

Benign esophageal lesions have a wide spectrum of clinical and pathologic features. Understanding the endoscopic and pathologic features of esophageal lesions is essential for their detection, differential diagnosis, and management. The purpose of this review is to provide updated features that may help physicians to appropriately manage these esophageal lesions. The endoscopic features of 2997 patients are reviewed. In epithelial lesions, the frequency of occurrence was in the following order: glycogenic acanthosis, heterotopic gastric mucosa, squamous papilloma, hyperplastic polyp, ectopic sebaceous gland and xanthoma. In subepithelial lesions, the order was as follows: hemangioma, leiomyoma, dysphagia aortica and granular cell tumor. Most benign esophageal lesions can be diagnosed according to their endoscopic appearance and findings on routine biopsy, and submucosal lesions, by endoscopic resection. Management is generally based upon the confidence of diagnosis and whether the lesion causes symptoms. We suggest endoscopic resection of all granular cell tumors and squamous papillomas because, while rare, these lesions have malignant potential. Dysphagia aortica should be considered in the differential diagnosis of dysphagia in the elderly.

In a 58-year-old male, upper digestive endoscopy revealed a protruding lesion in the esophagus on a medical examination. The patient was referred to the Department of Surgery in our hospital to undergo surgery. On the initial consultation, upper digestive endoscopy showed a smooth, soft, black purple, type II protruding lesion measuring approximately 25 mm at 35 cm apart from the incisor. For diagnostic treatment and patient's request, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) was performed. The resected specimen measured 25 mm x 25 mm. The histological findings suggested cavernous hemangioma. To treat esophageal hemangioma, esohagectomy, tumor enucleation, or sclerotherapy has been performed. However, recently, thorough preoperative examination, such as endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), has facilitated endoscopic resection, such as EMR.

Hemangiomas are tumors of vascular origin and represent less than 3% of benign neoplasm of the esophagus. We herein report a case of a 55-year-old man, who presented transitory dysphagia and weight loss. A malignancy could not be excluded by a complete work-up, including esophagogram, endoscopic biopsies, CT scan, esophageal endoscopic ultrasonography, PET and thoracoscopic biopsies. Only after partial esophagectomy with laparoscopic gastric mobilization was histological diagnosis obtained. In fact, on microscopic observation of the specimen, the neoplasm appeared to be a cavernous hemangioma of the esophageal submucosa with transparietal extension.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy has changed in recent years from a largely diagnostic to a highly therapeutic procedure. Technical advances in endoscopic ultrasound as well as new devices designed for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) have opened the field to many therapeutic possibilities. Endoscopic resection is technically challenging, and while our colleagues in the Far East have been using such techniques for over a decade, EMR in the West is still in its infancy. The decision to resect a benign esophageal tumor must take several factors into account including whether the patient is symptomatic; characteristics of the particular tumor (including the potential for malignant transformation, risk of bleeding, and obstruction); and the available therapeutic options. Endoscopic resection of benign esophageal tumors is an attractive option as it is a safe and minimally invasive procedure. Its use is limited, however, to smaller tumors arising from the mucosal or submucosal layers. In this article we examine the techniques used in endoscopic mucosal resection and review the literature on this subject.

Esophageal hemangioma is an extremely rare tumor. We report a case of a 39-year-old man who was found to have an hemangioma which extended from the hypopharynx to the upper thoracic esophagus revealed by endoscopic examination. Computed tomography (CT) images, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and angiography were useful in the diagnosis. He was successfully treated by fulguration using potassium titanyl phosphate/yttrium aluminum garnet (KTP/YAG laser) four times and no recurrence has been seen. This patient has since been followed up carefully and additional fulguration will be performed if necessary. KTP/YAG laser is useful for the treatment of a large hemangioma as a less invasive method.

Haemangioma of the oesophagus is uncommon in patients with benign oesophageal tumours. We present a patient with an oesophageal haemangioma detected during mass screening of the upper gastrointestinal tract. The patient, a 59-year-old man, had neither abdominal complaints nor a history of gastrointestinal diseases. Endoscopic examination revealed a blue-coloured submucosal tumour (approximately 3 cm in diameter) at the middle portion of oesophagus. Endoscopic Doppler ultrasonography showed an homogeneous and hypoechoic mass without blood flow in the submucosal layer of the oesophagus. However, a magnetic resonance imaging scan did not give a typical image for oesophageal haemangioma. Therefore, partial resection of the tumour was performed to obtain a differential diagnosis using the procedures of endoscopic ligation and polypectomy. Histological examination of the resected tissue showed a cavernous haemangioma in the oesophagus. This endoscopic technique may be useful for the differential diagnosis of oesophageal haemangioma.

Submucosal hemorrhage of the esophagus is an uncommon complication of endoscopy. It has a characteristic appearance and is most likely to occur in patients with cervical osteophytes. It is important to recognize the lesion so that unnecessary biopsies are not taken and other investigations are limited.

We report herein the case of a 46-year-old man in whom an esophageal hemangioma was successfully treated by endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS). The patient was admitted to hospital after a routine upper gastrointestinal series demonstrated a filling defect in the esophagus. Endoscopy, computed tomography (CT) images, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) subsequently revealed a hemangioma in the middle esophagus. EIS was performed using 99% ethanol and 1% polydocanol, and 4 weeks later, the tumor had almost disappeared. This patient has since been followed up carefully with periodic endoscopy and barium studies and additional sclerotherapy will be performed if necessary.

Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal submucosal lesions is still not established. We evaluated the clinical usefulness of two resection methods for submucosal lesions, using a "nonrandomized surgeon" design.

The strip biopsy method was evaluated at Tenri Hospital and the aspiration lumpectomy method was used at Kyoto University Hospital. The inclusion criteria for selecting patients were endosonographic findings indicating a tumor location within the submucosa.

Seventy-seven patients were treated. The size of the specimens (mean +/- SEM) was 20.7 +/- 0.9 mm for the aspiration lumpectomy group and 14.0 +/- 0.8 mm for the strip biopsy group (p < 0.01). Aspiration lumpectomy was adequate for a definitive histologic diagnosis in 95% of the cases (36 of 38) as compared with 77% (30 to 39) of the cases treated by strip biopsy (p = 0.047). The eradication rate was 87% for the aspiration lumpectomy group, and 74% for the strip biopsy group (p = 0.274). The complication rate resulting from these procedures (hemorrhage, mean 5%) was acceptable. Repeated endoscopic examinations revealed no recurrence except for one lymphangioma.

Endoscopic resection, especially aspiration lumpectomy, provides a significant benefit for accurate final diagnosis and eradication of submucosal lesions.