Colorectal cancer (CRC) is highly prevalent worldwide, and despite notable progress in treatment still leads to significant morbidity and mortality. The use of nanoparticles as a drug delivery system has become one of the most promising strategies for cancer therapy. Targeted nanoparticles could take advantage of differentially expressed molecules on the surface of tumor cells, providing effective release of cytotoxic drugs. Several efforts have recently reported the use of diverse molecules as ligands on the surface of nanoparticles to interact with the tumor cells, enabling the effective delivery of antitumor agents. Here, we present recent advances in targeted nanoparticles against CRC and discuss the promising use of ligands and cellular targets in potential strategies for the treatment of CRCs.

Standard chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) or gastric cancer (GC) consists of two-drug, usually fluoropyrimidine-based, combinations, with or without the addition of biological agents. Studies of triple-drug regimens combining 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) with both oxaliplatin and irinotecan have shown promising efficacy in studies of patients with mCRC or GC. However, improved efficacy has often been achieved at the expense of high rates of grade 3 or 4 toxicities such as neutropenia and diarrhoea, occasionally even resulting in toxic deaths.

We performed a phase II study of previously untreated patients with mCRC or GC to assess the safety and efficacy of our 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid/oxaliplatin/irinotecan (FUFOXIRI) regimen with weekly administration of irinotecan 70 mg/m(2), oxaliplatin 50 mg/m(2), FA 500 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15 and 22, repeated from day 36.

A total of 22 patients were enrolled, 11 each with mCRC and GC receiving a median of four cycles per patient. The FUFOXIRI regimen was generally well tolerated with no toxic deaths, neutropenic fever or grade 4 toxicities. Most common grade 3 side effects were diarrhoea and neutropenia each affecting 24% of patients. Dose reductions due to toxicity were performed in 48% of all and 60% of patients having received at least two cycles of FUFOXIRI. The overall response rate was 46% (all partial responses), 55% and 36% for patients with mCRC and GC, respectively. Median progression-free survival for all patients, mCRC and GC patients was 9.5, 10.0 and 8.0 months, respectively. The median overall survival for all patients was 16.5, 18.0 and 15.0 months for patients with mCRC and GC, respectively.

These data show excellent tolerance and efficacy of the FUFOXIRI regimen in both mCRC and GC. Therefore, FUFOXIRI is a promising backbone for future studies incorporating biologic 'targeted' agents for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers.

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of the combination of weekly oxaliplatin x 4, weekly irinotecan x 4 and capecitabine Monday through Friday for 4 weeks of every 6 week cycle in patients with solid tumors; to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of these agents in this combination; to observe patients for clinical anti-tumor response.

Twenty-two patients with metastatic solid tumors received oxaliplatin 60 mg/m(2) weekly x 4, irinotecan beginning at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) weekly x 4, and capecitabine Monday through Friday for 4 weeks of every 6 week cycle, initially at 1,000 mg twice daily (bid).

The MTD was oxaliplatin 60 mg/m(2) weekly x 4, irinotecan 50 mg/m(2) weekly x 4 and capecitabine 450 mg bid Monday through Friday for 4 weeks of every 6 week cycle. One of six patients at this dose level developed DLT of nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Among patients treated with a constant capecitabine dose of 450 mg bid, there was a higher mean AUC of 5-FU in women than in men (mean +/- SD: 892 +/- 287 nM h vs. 537 +/- 182 nM h; Mann-Whitney two-tailed, P = 0.02). There was one complete response in a patient with gastric cancer.

The novel schedule of weekly oxaliplatin, weekly irinotecan, and capecitabine Monday through Friday, all administered for 4 weeks of every 6 week cycle, evaluated in this phase I trial is well-tolerated and demonstrated activity in a patient with gastric cancer.

The past years' therapy for colorectal cancer has evolved rapidly with the introduction of novel cytotoxic agents such as irinotecan, capecitabine and oxaliplatin. Further advances have been achieved with the integration of targeted agents such as bevacizumab, cetuximab and recently, panitumumab. As a result, third-line treatment is now a necessary step in the optimal treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC).

We conducted a literature review of English language publications on third-line therapy for MCRC from January 2000 to April 2007. Data on median overall survival (mOS), median time to progression (mTTP) and response rate were recorded.

We found 27 articles and 22 abstracts to fulfil the criteria. Patients who received regimens containing oxaliplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) demonstrated mTTP up to 7 months and a mOS of 16 months. With irinotecan and 5-FU, mOS around 8 months were reported and with cetuximab combined with irinotecan, the highest mOS was 9.8 months.

Third-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer may improve mOS for patients with MCRC. Therefore, randomized studies should be conducted in the future.

The clinical management of metastatic (stage IV) colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common challenge faced by surgeons and physicians. The last decade has seen exciting developments in the management of CRC, with significant improvements in prognosis for patients diagnosed with stage IV disease. Treatment options have expanded from 5-fluorouracil alone to a range of pharmaceutical and interventional therapies, improving survival, and providing a cure in selected cases. Enhanced understanding of the biologic pathways most important in colorectal carcinogenesis has led to a new generation of drugs showing promise in advanced disease. It is hoped that in the near future the treatment paradigm of metastatic CRC will be analogous to that of a chronic illness, rather than a rapidly terminal condition. This overview discusses the epidemiology of advanced CRC and currently available therapeutic options including medical, surgical, ablative and novel modalities in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Recently, major developments in the treatment of colon cancer have emerged. These developments include improvements in surgical technique and staging and the introduction of new molecularly targeted pharmacologic agents. Improvements in surgical management involve enhanced staging techniques, allowing more accurate determination of risk of recurrence. Newer agents, such as oxaliplatin, cetuximab, and bevacizumab, now are approved for the treatment of colon cancer. The data associated with use of oxaliplatin in adjuvant and metastatic settings continue to mature; survival benefits are expected to become more fully apparent in the next two years. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody that neutralizes vascular endothelial growth factor, when combined with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (IFL), was superior to IFL alone in achieving median and progression-free survival. Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor, when given in combination with irinotecan, achieved an increased objective response and increased time to progression, compared with cetuximab alone, in patients refractory to irinotecan-containing regimens. In addition to surgical and pharmacologic developments, the recognition that genetics and molecular markers play an important role in carcinogenesis has heightened research to integrate this knowledge into practice. Nurses play a pivotal role in the care of patients with colon cancer and must be conversant in the new advances in treatment.

Treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer include surgical resection, radiation, hepatic chemoembolization, immunotherapy and intravenous chemotherapy. Complete surgical resection of liver metastases is feasible only for solitary or unilobar metastasis. Unresectable hepatic metastases of colorectal origin are resistant to radiation and immunotherapy, and the unsatisfactory results of systemic chemotherapy and chemoembolization have led to more aggressive treatment. A new method that combines systemic chemotherapy and chemoembolization is proposed. In this study, data from a total of 40 patients with unresectable hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer were collected. All of these patients received combined chemoembolization and systemic chemotherapy. Embolization was performed by the selective cannulation of right and left hepatic artery. Equal amounts of a mixture of 10 ml lipiodol, 1,500 mg 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and 15 mg leucovorin was deployed selectively in equal parts into the main right and left hepatic artery. Two weeks following chemoembolization, patients underwent systemic chemotherapy with 2,600 mg/m2 5-FU continuous infusion for 24 h and received 150 mg leucovorin intravenous bolus. The course of chemotherapy was repeated weekly for 24 weeks. The median follow-up period was 27 months (range 10-36 months). Following the intention-to-treat principle, the objective tumor response rate was 47.5%. The median disease-free interval was 12 months and the median survival time was 16 months. Most of the patients (73%) died of hepatic failure, while the second largest group died of abdominal carcinomatosis. In conclusion, the results of this study are of sufficient interest to justify future randomized trials.

For more than 40 years, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been considered the most effective systemic agent for managing advanced colorectal cancer. However, continuous-infusion (CI) schedules of 5-FU require central venous access devices, which are associated with catheter complications and are an inconvenience to patients. The novel oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine appears to offer comparable efficacy while providing a more convenient schedule that is often preferred by patients. Published phase II/III clinical studies of capecitabine-based regimens for colorectal cancer were compared with key studies of CI 5-FU-based regimens to assess safety, efficacy, quality of life, and pharmacoeconomics. Studies were identified via Medline searches and conference abstracts dating back to 1997. Qualitative analyses show that capecitabine as a single agent as well as in combination regimens is an effective first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer, providing a higher response rate compared with standard 5-FU/leucovorin. Costs associated with capecitabine also appear to be lower than those associated with catheter-based therapies. Capecitabine offers physicians a more convenient treatment for advanced colorectal cancer, with manageable toxicity and antitumor activity comparable to that of CI therapies.

The combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin (LV) with oxaliplatin has become one of the standard treatments for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Two consecutive phase II trials assessed the efficacy and safety of combined therapy with oxaliplatin and high-dose 5-FU without LV for patients with advanced CRC. A total of 89 patients were enrolled in both trials. Fifty-nine patients in trial A underwent a scheduled regimen of biweekly oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) and weekly nonmodulated 5-FU 3.0 g/m(2). Increased incidence of toxicity led to a 25% reduction in the starting dose of 5-FU (2.25 g/m(2)) for trial B. Patients treated in trial B showed a higher cumulative dose and relative dose intensity for oxaliplatin and 5-FU than those treated in trial A. Response to treatment, time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and duration of response were evaluated as efficacy variables. Overall response rate was preserved despite the reduction in 5-FU dose (55.9% and 63.0%, respectively). Median durations of responses were 10.6 and 10.4 months, median TTPs were 7.7 and 7.3 months, and OS times were 21.7 and 13.1 months, respectively. Reduction in the starting 5-FU dose from 3.0 to 2.25 g/m(2) resulted in a decrease in the main grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities (neutropenia, 22.0% to 10.0%) and nonhematologic toxicities (diarrhea, 52.5% to 23.3%; nausea/vomiting, 18.6% to 3.3%). Neurosensory toxicity was similar in both trials (16.9% and 16.7%). Biweekly oxaliplatin in combination with nonmodulated high-dose 5-FU is an active, well-tolerated treatment that offers a lower cost than a modulated schedule for patients with advanced, metastatic CRC.

Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) is the only platinum compound to show clinical activity in colorectal cancer. The efficacy of a combination of oxaliplatin with various schedules of fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) as first- or second-line treatment for advanced metastatic colorectal cancer has been investigated in large phase III trials. FOLFOX4 (an oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA regimen) as first-line therapy (n = 795) was superior to irinotecan/5-FU/FA (IFL). Response rates were 45% vs 31%, and median progression-free survival duration was 8.7 vs 6.9 months. The survival advantage shown by FOLFOX4 over the irinotecan combination (median survival duration 19.5 vs 14.8 months) may be confounded by differences in post-study treatment but equivalent efficacy is supported by another phase III trial of oxaliplatin and irinotecan combinations. As first-line therapy, oxaliplatin added to various 5-FU/FA regimens more than doubled the response rates from 16-22.6% to 48.3-53% and the median duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer with oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA than 5-FU/FA alone (7.9-9 versus 5.3-6.2 months, respectively). In disease resistant to irinotecan-based therapies, the oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) regimen had superior efficacy to 5-FU/FA alone in a pivotal phase III trial (n = 816). Response rates and median durations of progression-free survival were 9.6% vs 0.7% and 5.6 vs 2.6 months, respectively. An oxaliplatin-induced cumulative peripheral sensory neuropathy (evident when total dose reaches approximate, equals 800 mg/m(2)) is dose limiting. The most frequently occurring grade 3 or 4 toxicities in oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA-recipients were neutropenia (up to 48%) and neurological toxicities (up to 18%). Gastrointestinal effects (diarrhoea [ approximate, equals 12%], nausea, vomiting, or mucositis/stomatitis [up to 6%]) are manageable. Withdrawals from oxaliplatin treatment were due to neuropathy (up to 10%), diarrhoea and/or vomiting (1%) or cutaneous toxicity (1%).

As first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, oxaliplatin with 5-FU/FA consistently improves response rates and progression-free survival compared with various regimens of 5-FU/FA alone. The significant survival advantage shown by oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA (FOLFOX4) compared with first-line therapy with irinotecan/5-FU/FA (IFL) is encouraging but may require further confirmation. Oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA produces a significantly higher response rate and longer progression-free survival than 5-FU/FA in patients failing irinotecan-based therapies, and as such is also a useful second-line treatment. Although cumulative neurotoxicity is dose limiting, oxaliplatin has a manageable tolerability profile. Oxaliplatin as first- or second-line therapy is a valuable addition to the limited, but expanding, armamentarium of cytotoxic agents useful in advanced metastatic colorectal cancer.