Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is used when biliary drainage using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography fails. Recently, it has been adopted as a primary biliary drainage method, and its indications have expanded. Since EUS-BD can cause adverse events (AEs), such as bile leakage and stent migration, which do not occur in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, endoscopists need to be well-versed in its management and preventive techniques. EUS-BD includes several procedures, such as EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS), EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS), EUS-guided antegrade stenting (EUS-AS), and EUS-guided rendezvous (EUS-RV). A recent meta-analysis reported that the overall AE rate of EUS-BD was 13.7% (EUS-CDS, 11.9%; EUS-HGS, 15.5%; EUS-AS, 9.9%; and EUS-RV, 8.8%). Among various EUS-BD techniques, EUS-CDS and EUS-HGS are the most frequently reported. Tubular self-expandable metal stents have been traditionally used in EUS-CDS; however, lumen-apposing metal stents have recently gained popularity. A systematic review showed that the rates of early AEs were similar between self-expandable metal stents and lumen-apposing metal stents; however, stent maldeployment was more problematic with lumen-apposing metal stents. Although tubular self-expandable metal stents are used in EUS-HGS, stent maldeployment remains a serious issue, and available devices and technical tips for preventing this AE should be well understood. Furthermore, AEs, such as sepsis, cholangitis, and bleeding, can occur, and strategies to mitigate these risks are essential. In this narrative review, we discussed AEs related to EUS-BD with a focus on management options and strategies for prevention.

Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD), including choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS), are alternative methods for biliary drainage in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Data on long-term outcomes, adverse events (AEs), and quality of life (QoL) after EUS-CDS and PTBD are limited. Therefore, we created a registry to evaluate the outcomes of both drainage procedures.Patients with distal MBO who underwent EUS-CDS or PTBD after unsuccessful ERCP were included in this multicenter investigator-initiated prospective registry over an 18-month inclusion period. Primary end points were procedure-related AEs and mortality within 90 days post-procedure. Secondary end points included technical and clinical success, reinterventions, hospital stay, and QoL.55 patients were included, with 12 patients undergoing PTBD (technical success 100%) and 43 patients EUS-CDS (technical success 97.7%). Prior to ERCP, 7/12 patients in the PTBD group and 12/43 patients in the EUS-CDS group opted for best supportive care. The 90-day mortality rate was 66.7% in the PTBD group and 20.9% in the EUS-CDS group (P = 0.005). Furthermore, 11/12 patients (91.7%) in the PTBD group and 19/43 (44.2%) in the EUS-CDS group developed one or more AEs (P = 0.004). The median post-procedural hospital stay was 4 days (interquartile range [IQR] 2-6) in the PTBD group vs. 1 day (IQR 1-2) in the EUS-CDS group (P = 0.001).When both modalities were available and technically feasible, gastroenterologists preferred EUS-CDS over PTBD. EUS-CDS seems to be associated with lower mortality and AE rates, shorter hospital admission, and fewer reinterventions, but a randomized controlled trial should confirm these observations.

 Preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage may lead to complications (16 %-24 %), potentially hampering surgical exploration. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) may reduce drainage-related complications; however, in the absence of surgeon-reported outcomes, it is unknown whether EUS-CDS may hamper surgical exploration. This study assessed the impact of preoperative EUS-CDS on pancreatoduodenectomy.

 Consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy after preoperative biliary drainage were included in all eight centers performing EUS-CDS in the mandatory Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit (Jan 2020-Dec 2022). The primary outcome was major postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes included bile leak grade B/C, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade B/C, and overall postoperative complications. A propensity score-matching (1:3) analysis was performed. Surgeons performing pancreatoduodenectomy after EUS-CDS completed a survey on surgical difficulty.

 937 patients with pancreatoduodenectomy after preoperative biliary drainage were included (42 EUS-CDS, 895 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP]). Major postoperative complications occurred in 8 patients (19.0 %) in the EUS-CDS group and 292 (32.6 %) in the ERCP group (relative risk [RR] 0.50; 95 %CI 0.23-1.07). No significant differences were observed in overall complications (RR 0.95; 95 %CI 0.51-1.76), bile leak (RR 1.25; 95 %CI 0.31-4.98), or POPF (RR 0.62; 95 %CI 0.25-1.56). Results were similar after matching. The survey was completed for 29 pancreatoduodenectomies; surgery was not (13, 45 %), "slightly" (9, 31 %), "clearly" (5,17 %), and "severely" (2, 7 %) more complex because of EUS-CDS.

 This early experience suggests that preoperative biliary drainage with EUS-CDS does not increase the rate of complications after pancreatoduodenectomy and only infrequently hampers surgical exploration.

 We aimed to determine risk factors for technical failure of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS), evaluate short- and long-term consequences, and identify salvage techniques in patients with biliary obstruction.

 This retrospective multicenter study of EUS-CDS (2018-2024) included technical failure, classified as type 1 (digestive flange mispositioned), type 2 (biliary flange mispositioned), type 3 (stent deployment failure), type 4 (catheter/lumen-apposing metal stent [LAMS] through the bile duct), and type 5 (others). Controls were successful EUS-CDS in the same center and period. The primary end point was risk factors for failure. Secondary end points were endoscopic rescue techniques and immediate- and long-term consequences.

 Technical failure occurred in 7 % (95 %CI 5-9). Across 23 centers, 296 patients were analyzed (mean age 71 [SD 16] years, 53 % male), including 100 technical failures: type 1 (26 %), type 2 (41 %), type 3 (11 %), type 4 (6 %), type 5 (16 %). Risk factors for technical failure in multivariate analysis included CBD diameter ≤ 15 mm, duodenal stenosis, wired technique, and low operator experience (≤ 10 LAMS). Endoscopic salvage was successful in 77 %, with 53 % using a covered metal stent and 22 % using a new LAMS. Early failures were mild in 56 % of cases, but 12 % resulted in death within 30 days. Immediate endoscopic salvage reduced severe clinical adverse events (P < 0.001) and increased success rates (P < 0.001).

 EUS-CDS failures were not rare and were severe in half of cases. Recognizing risk factors, identifying failures during the procedure, and knowing endoscopic salvage methods are crucial.

Biliary drainage in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) carries a higher risk of difficult biliary cannulation (DBC) during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). After the failure of standard cannulation, endoscopists may proceed with advanced cannulation techniques and/or with endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD).This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients with DMBO and a dilated common bile duct (CBD; >12 mm) who underwent ERCP for endoscopic biliary drainage in four European centers. The rates of DBC, technical and clinical success, and procedure-related adverse events (AEs) were assessed. The predictive factors for AEs were also investigated through regression analysis. The EUS-BD approach was considered either as the first option after standard cannulation failure or as the final option after advanced cannulation failure.1016 patients with DMBO were included in the study, with 524 (51.6%) matching the definition of DBC. Clinical success was achieved in 956 patients (94.1%). Procedure-related AEs were experienced by 167 patients (16.4%). Patients with DBC had a higher risk of AEs (P=0.003); however, patients undergoing "early" EUS-BD showed a risk of AEs comparable with those managed with standard cannulation (P=0.38). An attempt at any advanced cannulation technique was independently associated with the occurrence of AEs (P=0.001).The risk of AEs is higher in patients with DMBO and DBC, this appears to be mainly related to the advanced cannulation techniques. In patients with a dilated CBD (>12 mm), "early" EUS-BD may minimize the risk of AEs.

Biliary drainage by ERCP in patients with malignant distal bile duct obstruction (MBO) is frequently associated with adverse events, such as pancreatitis, hampering patient outcomes. EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) with a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) is a promising alternative in patients with MBO but is associated with a worrisome risk of stent dysfunction. Placement of a fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) through the LAMS, thereby changing the axis of biliary drainage toward the descending duodenum, may decrease the risk of stent dysfunction while maintaining high technical success and low adverse event rates.

This was a prospective single-center pilot study in patients with pathology-confirmed MBO without gastric outlet obstruction. The primary outcome was stent dysfunction, defined as recurrent jaundice after initial clinical success, ongoing jaundice in combination with persistent bile duct dilatation, or cholangitis.

Overall, 27 consecutive patients eligible for EUS-CDS were enrolled. The placement of a LAMS was successful in 24 of 27 patients (89%), and placement of a FCSEMS through the LAMS was successful in 20 of 24 (83%); in the remaining 4 patients, a coaxial double-pigtail plastic stent was placed. Two of these 20 patients experienced persistent jaundice requiring stent revision (10%), leading to a clinical success rate of 90%. No patients developed stent dysfunction after initial clinical success.

This study showed a stent dysfunction rate of 10% after technically successful EUS-CDS with placement of a FCSEMS through the LAMS. Improving the design of LAMSs may further reduce the rate of stent dysfunction. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05595122.).

Patients with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) are often treated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) combined with biliary stent placement for tumor progression. However, certain patients die within 30 days after the procedure, increasing healthcare resource consumption and patient burden. Therefore, the development of early mortality prediction models is important for optimizing treatment decisions. The present study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 285 patients with MBO, including demographic information, laboratory indicators and tumor-related factors. Logistic regression and artificial neural network (ANN) models were used to construct a prediction tool, and the model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. The logistic regression model, which identified the cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level and a history of previous ERCP surgery as independent risk factors, had an AUC of 0.727 and an accuracy of 65.0%. The ANN model, which combined five variables, namely CA19-9, history of previous ERCP surgery, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), liver metastasis and carcinoembryonic antigen, demonstrated that NLR was the most weighted predictor. Furthermore, the ANN model had an AUC of 0.813, an accuracy of 88.2% and a specificity that was markedly higher than that of the logistic regression model (95.5 vs. 83.3%). However, the ANN model was revealed to be slightly less sensitive compared with the logistic regression model (61.1 vs. 61.2%). In conclusion, compared with logistic regression, the ANN model had a greater performance level in terms of predictive power and specificity, and is suitable for capturing complex non-linear relationships. However, its complexity and risk of overfitting need to be further optimized. The present study provides a new tool for the accurate prediction of the risk of early death after ERCP in patients with MBO, which could help improve individualized treatment strategies.

 Stent misdeployment (SMD) is a feared and poorly characterized technical challenge of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) using lumen-apposing stents. We aimed to ascertain the rate of stent misdeployment in EUS-CDS for malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) and describe its outcomes while identifying variables associated with its occurrence.

 This was a post hoc analysis of two randomized controlled trials comparing EUS-CDS vs. endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in MDBO. The primary end point was rate of SMD, classified as misdeployment of the distal flange (type I), proximal flange (type II), contralateral bile duct wall injury (type III), or double mucosal puncture (type IV). Multivariable analysis was performed to identify variables associated with SMD and/or technical failure, and with clinical failure or stent dysfunction.

 152 patients were included. Technical success was 93.4 %. SMD occurred in 11 patients (7.2 %; 95 %CI 3.1 %-11.4 %): 8 type I, 1 type II, and 2 type III. Endoscopic salvage of SMD was successful in 81.8 %. Misdeployment led to adverse events in four patients (two mild, two moderate), giving an overall SMD-related adverse event rate of 2.6 % (95 %CI 0.7 %-6.6 %). On multivariable analysis, extrahepatic bile duct diameter of ≤ 15 mm was associated with increased odds of SMD and/or technical failure.

 SMD was relatively common in EUS-CDS and was associated with an extrahepatic bile duct diameter of ≤ 15 mm. The majority of misdeployments could be rescued endoscopically with low risk for adverse events.

We present the case of a 70-year-old patient of Caucasian origin under palliative chemotherapy for metastasized colorectal cancer, who presented with signs of complete small bowel obstruction six months after placement of a diverting ileostomy. Following previous tumor perforation, he was not considered a candidate for further surgical intervention.Thus, endoscopic ultrasound-guided enterocolostomy (i.e., ileosigmoidostomy) with a lumen-apposing metal stent was successfully performed in a coloenteric approach to restore the passage.Oral nutrition could be resumed the next day, and the patient could be discharged in substantially improved condition after three days.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is among the most lethal cancers, characterized by late diagnosis, rapid progression, and limited therapeutic options. Despite advancements, only 20% of patients are eligible for surgical resection at diagnosis, the sole curative treatment. Multidisciplinary evaluation is critical to optimize care, stratifying patients based on resectability into resectable, borderline resectable, locally advanced, and metastatic stages. Preoperative imaging, such as computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), remains central for staging, for vascular assessment, and tissue acquisition. Endoscopic and systemic approaches are pivotal for addressing complications like biliary obstruction and improving outcomes. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been considered for years the gold standard for biliary drainage, although EUS-guided drainage is increasingly utilized due to its efficacy in both resectable and unresectable disease. Systemic therapies play a key role in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and palliative settings, with ongoing trials exploring their impact on survival and resectability chance. This review highlights the evolving multidisciplinary approaches tailored to the disease stage, focusing on biliary drainage techniques, systemic therapies, and their integration into comprehensive care pathways for PDAC. The continuous refinement of these strategies offers incremental survival benefits and underscores the importance of personalized, multidisciplinary management.

Difficult biliary cannulation (DBC) is a marker for prolonged procedure time and a higher rate of adverse events (AEs) during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We previously showed that endoscopic ultrasound-assisted rendezvous (EUS-RV) procedures had a higher single-session success rate than precut papillotomy (PCP) in cases of DBC. The present randomized study aimed to compare the technical success and AE rates of the two approachesThis was an open-label randomized controlled trial in a tertiary care setting. Patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) and DBC were enrolled. The patients were randomized to PCP with a needle-knife or EUS-RV. The primary outcome was technical success; secondary outcomes were the AE rate, procedure duration, and length of hospital stay (LOS).208 patients were enrolled, 104 in each group. There were no statistically significant differences in technical success (93.3% PCP vs. 97.1% EUS-RV; P = 0.33; odds ratio [OR] 0.4, 95%CI 0.1-1.6) and overall AE rate (11.5% PCP vs. 5.8% EUS-RV; P=0.14; OR 0.5, 95%CI 0.8-5.9). Pancreatitis was higher in the PCP group (8.7% vs. 1.9%; P=0.06; OR 4.8, 95%CI 1.0-22.9). The mean duration of the procedure was significantly higher for EUS-RV (47 vs. 27 minutes; P<0.001). LOS was similar in the two groups (1.2 PCP vs. 1.1 days EUS-RV; P=0.25).Both PCP and EUS-RV have comparable rates of success, AEs, mortality, and LOS. EUS-RV could be used as an alternative to PCP in patients with MDBO and DBC.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is considered the gold standard for treating benign and malignant biliary obstructions. However, its use in complex biliary obstructions is limited. Over the past decades, therapeutic endosonography (EUS) and emerging technologies such as lumen-apposing metal stents have enabled endoscopic treatment of conditions previously requiring non-endoscopic or surgical approaches. Studies show that EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy is a reliable alternative to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the treatment of distal malignant biliary obstructions and can be considered a primary drainage modality in centers with adequate expertise. For malignant hilar biliary obstructions, draining at least 50% of viable liver tissue often requires combining different modalities. The treatment strategy in these patients should be individualized, depending on the Bismuth classification, patient physical status, and intended systemic therapy. Due to the lack of evidence, general recommendations cannot be made for EUS-guided hepaticoduodenostomy or combined procedures with transhepatic bridging stents. These novel techniques should be limited to selected palliative cases where conventional methods have failed and conducted within clinical trials to generate evidence before broader application.

Multiple endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided therapeutic interventions have been developed for the management of benign and malignant pancreaticobiliary and gastrointestinal luminal pathology. Recent high-quality evidence is increasingly validating these interventions and positioning them within evidence-based therapeutic algorithms.

Here we review therapeutic EUS-guided interventions including pancreatic fluid collection drainage, gastroenterostomy, biliary drainage, pancreatic duct drainage and gallbladder drainage. The most up-to-date high-quality evidence supporting these interventions is presented including comparative data with other conventional treatment options. Newer emerging interventions such as tumor ablation are also reviewed. Current controversies and future avenues for research are discussed. The key role of EUS-guided interventions in managing pancreaticobiliary pathology in patients with a surgically altered anatomy is highlighted.

Multiple EUS therapeutic interventions have evolved from experimental or rescue options to now well established first- and second-line interventions over other endoscopic, percutaneous and surgical alternatives with the support of high-quality data. Further research is needed to better optimize patient selection and guide long term postintervention follow-up.

EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is an effective biliary drainage technique for patients with altered anatomy or duodenal strictures. EUS-guided hepaticojejunostomy (EUS-HJS) can be used to create a fistula between the left hepatic duct and the jejunum in patients with a history of total gastrectomy. No specific data on this technique have been published. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of EUS-HJS in patients with a history of total gastrectomy.

This retrospective multicenter study included all adult patients who underwent EUS-HJS at 3 tertiary French centers and 1 tertiary Swiss center between May 2011 and February 2023. The primary outcome was clinical success, which was defined as the disappearance of pruritus, jaundice, and/or cholangitis. An improvement in bilirubin >30% within the first week and/or bilirubin normalization within 1 month after the procedure were also considered indicators of clinical success. Secondary outcomes were technical success, rate of adverse events, need for endoscopic revision, possibility of resuming anticancer treatment, median survival, and technical differences compared with EUS-HGS.

Twenty-one patients with history of complete gastrectomy who underwent EUS-HJS were included. Technical success was achieved in 100% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 85-100). Clinical success was achieved in 80% of patients (95% CI, 58-92). The incidence of recorded adverse events was 33% (95% CI, 17-55), with cholangitis being the most frequent adverse event. Seven patients (39%) were able to benefit from anticancer treatment after the procedure. Median survival time was 6 months (interquartile range, 1.5-12).

EUS-HJS is an effective and feasible procedure for patients whose anatomy has been altered by total gastrectomy.

Hyperplasia at the distal side of an EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) stent is one of the most frequent causes of stent dysfunction. However, risk factors for hyperplasia during EUS-HGS remain unclear. The aim of the present study was to determine the most appropriate stent site during EUS-HGS to obtain prolonged stent patency.

This study included 100 consecutive patients who underwent successful EUS-HGS using a partially covered, self-expandable, metal stent (PCSEMS) between January 2017 and September 2022. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the distal site of the PCSEMS at the intrahepatic bile duct, the peripheral side group and the central side group.

There were 30 patients in the peripheral side group and 70 in the central side group. The diameter of the intrahepatic bile duct at the PCSEMS deployment site was significantly greater in the central side group (mean 7.90 mm) than in the peripheral side group (mean 4.25 mm; P < 0.05). Stent patency was significantly longer in the central side group than in the peripheral side group (median, 60 days vs. 144 days, P = 0.011), although overall survival was not significantly different. Hyperplasia was significantly more frequent in the peripheral side group. On multivariate analysis, the site of the PCSEMS (peripheral) was the only risk factor for stent dysfunction.

In conclusion, the distal site of the PCSEMS deployed at the hepatic hilar site from the confluence between B2 and B3 might play a role in obtaining longer stent patency.

Malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ) encompasses a range of diseases stemming from malignant tumors such as cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic cancer, and primary liver cancer, among others, which cause obstruction in both intra- and extra-hepatic bile ducts. This obstruction may lead to elevated bilirubin levels, hepatic function impairment, and a low rate of successful surgical resection in clinical settings. There are various minimally invasive treatment options for MOJ, including endoscopic biliary drainage, ultrasound-guided procedures, and percutaneous biliary tract puncture drainage.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided interventions have revolutionized the management of malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) and gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), providing minimally invasive alternatives with improved outcomes. These procedures have significantly reduced the need for high-risk surgical interventions or percutaneous alternatives and have provided effective palliative care for patients with advanced gastrointestinal and bilio-pancreatic malignancies. EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) techniques, including hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS), choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS), and antegrade stenting (EUS-AS), offer high technical and clinical success rates, with a good safety profile particularly when Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is not feasible. EUS-HGS, which allows biliary drainage by trans-gastric route, is primarily used for proximal stenosis or in case of surgically altered anatomy; EUS-CDS with Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent (LAMS) for distal MBO (dMBO), EUS-AS as an alternative of EUS-HGS in the bridge-to-surgery scenario or when retrograde access is not possible and EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) with LAMS in case of dMBO with cystic duct patent without dilation of common bile duct (CDB). EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) has already established its role as an effective alternative to surgical GE and enteral self-expandable metal stent, providing relief from GOO with fewer complications and faster recovery times. However, we do not yet have strong evidence on how to combine the different EUS-guided drainage techniques with EUS-GE in the setting of double obstruction. This comprehensive review aims to synthesize growing evidence on this topic by randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series not only to summarize the efficacy, safety, and technical aspects of these procedures but also to propose a treatment algorithm based essentially on the anatomy and stage of the neoplasm to guide clinical decision-making, incorporating the principles of personalized medicine. This review also highlights the transformative impact of EUS-guided interventions on the treatment landscape for MBO and GOO. These techniques offer safer and more effective options than traditional approaches, with the potential for widespread clinical adoption. Further research is needed to refine these procedures, expand their applications, and improve patient care and quality of life.

Pancreatic cancer serves as the third leading cause of cancer-associated morbidity and mortality in the United States, with a 5-year survival rate of only 12% with an expected increase in incidence and mortality in the coming years. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas constitute most pancreatic malignancies. Certain genetic syndromes, including Lynch syndrome, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, hereditary pancreatitis, familial adenomatous polyposis, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, familial pancreatic cancer mutation, and ataxia telangiectasia, confer a significantly higher risk. Screening for pancreatic malignancies currently targets patients with germline mutations or those with significant family history. Screening the general population is not currently viable owing to overall low incidence and lack of specific tests. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and its applied advances are increasingly being used for surveillance, diagnosis, and management of pancreatic malignancies and have now become an indispensable tool in their management. For patients with risk factors, EUS in combination with magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is used for screening. The role of endoscopic modalities has been expanding with the increased utilization of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, EUS-directed therapies include EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration and EUS-fine-needle biopsy (FNB). EUS combined with FNB has the highest specificity and sensitivity for detecting pancreatic cancer amongst available modalities. Studies also recognize that artificial intelligence assisted EUS in the early detection of pancreatic cancer. At the same time, surgical resection has been historically considered the only curative treatment for pancreatic cancer, over 80% of patients present with unresectable disease. We also discuss EUS-guided therapies of physicochemicals (radiofrequency ablation, brachytherapy, and intratumor chemotherapy), biological agents (gene therapies and oncolytic viruses), and immunotherapy. We aim to perform a detailed review of the current burden, risk factors, role of screening, diagnosis, and endoscopic advances in the treatment modalities available for pancreatic cancer.

 We assessed efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) vs. endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as first-line intervention in malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO).

 PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched until 01 /12 /2023 for randomized controlled trials of EUS-BD vs. ERCP for primary biliary drainage in patients with inoperable MDBO. The primary outcome was technical success. Secondary outcomes were clinical success, adverse events, mean procedure time, 1-year stent patency, and overall survival. Relative risk (RR) with 95 %CI were calculated using a random effects model.

 Five studies (519 patients) were included. RR (95 %CI) for EUS-BD was 1.06 (0.96 to 1.17; P = 0.27) for pooled technical success and 1.02 (0.97 to 1.08; P = 0.45) for clinical success. 1-year stent patency was similar between the groups (RR 1.15, 0.94 to 1.42; P = 0.17), with lower reintervention with EUS-BD (RR 0.58, 0.37 to 0.9; P = 0.01). The RR was 0.85 (0.49 to 1.46; P = 0.55) for adverse events and 0.97 (0.10 to 0.17; P = 0.98) for severe adverse events. On subgroup analysis, EUS-guided placement of lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) outperformed ERCP in terms of technical success (RR 1.17, 1.01 to 1.35; P = 0.03). Procedure time was lower with EUS-BD (standardized mean difference -2.36 minutes [-2.68 to -2.05; P < 0.001]).

 EUS-BD showed a statistically significant lower reintervention rate than ERCP, but with similar technical success, stent patency, clinical success, and safety. Technical success of EUS-BD with LAMS was better than ERCP.

Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) encompasses an array of procedures to manage pancreaticobiliary and luminal gastrointestinal disorders. Therapeutic EUS procedures include EUS-guided rendezvous of the pancreatic and biliary ducts, as well as direct drainage of the bile duct, pancreatic duct, and gallbladder, drainage of pancreatic fluid collections, and luminal anastomosis creation. These procedures have a range of required equipment, approaches, clinical outcomes, and adverse events dependent on both procedure-related and patient-related factors. In expert hands, these procedures provide patients with less invasive options and can achieve excellent clinical outcomes.

The effectiveness of various primary upfront drainage techniques for distal malignant biliary obstructions (dMBO) is not well-established.

To compare the technical and clinical success rates and adverse event (AE) rates of various primary drainage techniques.

We systematically reviewed RCTs comparing the technical and clinical success and AE rates of EUS-choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) with lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS), EUS-CDS with self-expandable metal stents (SEMS), EUS-hepaticogastrostomy (HGS), ERCP, and PTBD performed upfront.

Six RCTs involving 583 patients were analyzed. EUS-CDS with LAMS showed significantly higher technical success compared to EUS-CDS with SEMS (RR 1.21, 95 % CI 1.07-1.37) and ERCP (RR 1.17, 95 % CI 1.07-1.28). EUS-CDS with LAMS had the highest rank in technical success (SUCRA = 0.86). The clinical success rate was also higher with EUS-CDS with LAMS than with ERCP (RR 1.12, 1.01-1.25). PTBD was the worst ranked procedure for safety (SUCRA score = 0.18), while EUS-CDS with LAMS was the top procedure for procedural time (SUCRA score = 0.83).

EUS-CDS with LAMS has the highest technical and clinical success rates and is significantly superior to ERCP as the upfront technique for dMBO treatment. PTBD should be abandoned as first-line treatment due to the poor safety profile.

In a recent issue of the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, a meta-analysis investigated the safety and efficacy of electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent (ECE-LAMS) implantation for managing malignant biliary obstruction following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. This manuscript endeavors to offer a comprehensive look at the progression of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) technologies, weighing their merits and drawbacks against traditional percutaneous methods. Several meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials have compared the performance of EUS-BD and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage (PTCD). These studies revealed that the technical success rate, clinical success rate, and adverse events were similar between EUS-BD and PTCD. Nevertheless, given that most of these studies predate 2015, the safety and effectiveness of novel EUS-BD techniques, including ECE-LAMS, compared with those of percutaneous biliary drainage remain elusive. Further investigation is imperative to ascertain whether these novel EUS-BD techniques can safely and efficaciously replace conventional percutaneous therapeutic approaches.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has dramatically spread and improved in the last two decades and is changing the paradigm of drainage in case of malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). EUS-BD can be achieved from different routes, including the common bile duct (choledochoduodenostomy), intrahepatic bile ducts (hepaticogastrostomy), and gallbladder as a rescue (cholecystogastrostomy/cholecystoduodenostomy). EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is a valuable option for biliary drainage in MBO when ERCP fails or is not feasible. EUS-HGS has demonstrated high efficacy with a good rate of technical and clinical success. The safety profile is also overall favorable, although severe adverse events may occur in a significant proportion of patients. From a technical perspective, EUS-HGS is considered one of the most demanding procedures in biliopancreatic endoscopy, requiring multiple steps and high technical skills and experience. In this comprehensive review, technical tips and clinical outcomes of EUS-HGS are reviewed according to the latest evidence in the literature.

The consensus-based TOKYO criteria were proposed as a standardized reporting system for endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage. The primary objective was to address issues arising from the inconsistent reporting of stent outcomes across studies, which has complicated the comparability and interpretation of study results. However, the original TOKYO criteria were not readily applicable to recent modalities of endoscopic biliary drainage such as biliary drainage based on endoscopic ultrasound or device-assisted endoscopy. There are increasing opportunities for managing hilar biliary obstruction and benign biliary strictures through endoscopic drainage. Biliary ablation has been introduced to manage benign and malignant biliary strictures. In addition, the prolonged survival times of cancer patients have increased the importance of evaluating overall outcomes during the period requiring endoscopic biliary drainage rather than solely focusing on the patency of the initial stent. Recognizing these unmet needs, a committee has been established within the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society to revise the TOKYO criteria for current clinical practice. The revised criteria propose not only common reporting items for endoscopic biliary drainage overall, but also items specific to various conditions and interventions. The term "stent-demanding time" has been defined to encompass the entire duration of endoscopic biliary drainage, during which the overall stent-related outcomes are evaluated. The revised TOKYO criteria 2024 are expected to facilitate the design and reporting of clinical studies, providing a goal-oriented approach to the evaluation of endoscopic biliary drainage.

In patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction, drainage via Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) is indicated in clinical guidelines following a failed Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, current interest lies in evaluating its role as a first-line treatment. Through this letter, we present a case report that represents this clinical scenario, as well as a brief summary of the most recent literature supporting the use of EUS-CDS as a first-line treatment for malignant distal biliary obstruction.

Objectives: The current study compared potential risks, complications, and the impact on clinical outcomes among elderly and younger patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Methods: Procedure-related complications, risk factors, and clinical outcomes following complications in elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) and younger who underwent biliary ERCP were evaluated. Results: Median age of 63 (48-74) of 1164 patients who underwent biliary ERCP for the first time, and 266 (22.8%) were elderly. Comorbidities were statistically significant (81 [30.5%] versus 78 [8.7%], p < 0.001), and periampullary diverticulum (PAD) was detected more commonly in the elderly group (79 [29.7%] vs. 103 [11.5%], p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in cannulation technique, cannulation time, and cannulation success in both groups, while the total ERCP procedure time was higher in the elderly group (22 [16-29] vs. 20 [14-29], p = 0.030). Regarding the procedure-related complications, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (26 [9.8%] vs. 71 [7.9%], p = 0.292). In the case of complications, the length of hospitalization stay was statistically longer in the elderly group. Moreover, the elderly had a longer length of hospitalization, experiencing pancreatitis and a higher probability of developing moderate/severe pancreatitis. In multivariate and univariate analysis, prolonged cannulation time was found to be an independent risk factor in patients ≥75 years of age. Conclusions: This study showed that while ERCP-related complication rates in elderly patients are comparable to younger patients, it can be associated with worse outcomes following the complication and prolonged length of hospitalization.

Placement of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) across the duodenal major papilla carries a risk of duodenobiliary reflux (DBR). The suprapapillary method of stent placement may reduce DBR and improve stent patency compared with the transpapillary method. This study compared the clinical outcomes between the suprapapillary and transpapillary methods for distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO).

Between January 2021 and January 2023, consecutive patients with DMBO from 6 centers in South Korea were randomly assigned to either the suprapapillary arm or transpapillary method arm in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the duration of stent patency, and secondary outcomes were the cause of stent dysfunction, adverse events, and overall survival rate.

Eighty-four patients were equally assigned to each group. The most common cause of DMBO was pancreatic cancer (50, 59.5%), followed by bile duct (20, 23.8%), gallbladder (11, 13.1%), and other cancers (3, 3.6%). Stent patency was significantly longer in the suprapapillary group (median, 369 days [interquartile range, 289-497] vs 154 days [interquartile range, 78-361]; P < .01). Development of DBR was significantly lower in the suprapapillary group (9.4% vs 40.8%, P < .01). Adverse events and overall survival rate were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

The placement of SEMSs using the suprapapillary method resulted in a significantly longer duration of stent patency. It is advisable to place the SEMS using the suprapapillary method in DMBO. Further studies with a larger number of patients are required to validate the benefits of the suprapapillary method. (Clinical trial registration number: KCT0005572.).

Hepaticogastrostomy drainage through endoscopic ultrasound (EUS-HGS) has emerged in the 2010s as a new technique for biliary decompression in cases of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) failure for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). Substantial technical and procedural progress in performing EUS-HGS has been achieved, allowing high technical and clinical success and an acceptable risk of adverse events in studies mainly focusing on short-term outcomes. However, the long-term effects of EUS-HGS and the risk of recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) have not been fully evaluated.

To evaluate the long-term effects of EUS-HGS and the risk of RBO.

Data from 211 patients undergoing technically successful EUS-HGS in three academic centers were retrospectively collected. Clinical success, adverse events, RBO, and reinterventions were evaluated.

In total, 198 patients underwent technically successful EUS-HGS for MBO. The median overall survival was 144 days [108, 2011] after the procedure. Mean patient age was 69.39 (12.91) years. The cause of MBO was pancreatic cancer (n = 98, 49.5%) followed by cholangiocarcinoma (n = 29, 14.6%). The location of MBO was distal in 27.6% of cases and proximal in 68.4%. Adverse events were observed during the follow-up in 65 patients (33%). On multivariate analysis, the use of partially covered self-expandable metal stents (PCSEMS) was associated with a lower risk of RBO (HR = 0.47 [0.24-0.95], p = 0.034). Additionally, patients with distal stenoses had a trend toward better stent patency (HR = 0.06[0-0.77], p = 0.031). RBO developed in 38 cases (19.1%) mainly due tumor ingrowth (36.8%) with a high success rate of endoscopic management.

While RBO occurred in a notable proportion of patients, the primary cause of mortality was progression of the underlying malignancy rather than stent dysfunction. The efficiency of stents, particularly PCSEMS, and the high success rate of endoscopic management for RBO underscore the effectiveness and reliability of these treatments in managing biliary complications.

Lumen-apposing metal stents have ushered a new frontier for interventional endoscopic ultrasound. Initial use for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections has rapidly expanded to the bile duct, gallbladder and small bowel. Intra-luminal applications for short strictures have also emerged. Electrocautery enhancement has made the stent delivery speedy. While the advent of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) has brought a paradigm shift in the practice of interventional endoscopic ultrasound, their use is associated with certain technicalities that any advanced endosonologist should know. Understanding indications for LAMS is critical and their use in appropriate settings. Troubleshooting in tricky situations is always a challenge and the background considerations for their use include knowing the target organ, cautery and puncture technique, managing partially opened LAMS and also managing maldeployment. In this review, we discuss the intricacies and technical tips for the use of lumen-apposing metal stents.