Minimally invasive right hemicolectomy for cancer with complete mesocolic excision is a difficult procedure to perform. The aim of this single-center prospective study was to evaluate whether preoperative angio-CT colonography (A-CTC) improved the quality of lymph node dissection during this surgery.

All patients undergoing elective minimally invasive right hemicolectomy for colon adenocarcinoma with complete mesocolic excision between 01/2020 and 12/2023 have been prospectively included. The primary endpoint was the number of lymph nodes examined in the surgical specimen, including the total number of lymph nodes and the percentage of patients with at least 12 lymph nodes examined. Secondary endpoints included operating time, intraoperative complications, overall postoperative morbidity, and length of hospital stay. A propensity score was constructed with groups matched 3:1 using nearest neighbor matching based on the propensity score.

Of the 161 patients included, 44 had A-CTC (27%) and 117 had conventional CT scans. After propensity score matching, patients in the A-CTC group had significantly more lymph nodes on the surgical specimen (24 vs. 20, p = 0.006) and a better quality of lymph node dissection (≥ 12 examined lymph nodes: 100% vs. 87%, p < 0.001). Median operative times were similar between the two groups (184 vs. 180 min, p = 0.07), but two patients (2%) in the conventional CT group experienced an intraoperative bleeding complication. Postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay were comparable.

Preoperative 3D reconstruction of vascular anatomy with A-CTC is useful and improves the quality of lymph node dissection during minimally invasive right hemicolectomy for cancer.

In vivo residual arterial pedicle length (RAPL) has been proposed as a quality indicator for central vascular ligation (CVL [i.e., RAPL ≤ 10 mm]) in colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. However, its survival association in non-routine CVL practice requires clarification. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of measuring RAPL alongside its oncological associations in non-routine CVL surgery.

A prospective cohort study at Concord Hospital was conducted on anterior resection (AR) or right hemicolectomy (RH) patients with stage I to III CRC (1995-2019). Using surveillance computed tomography (CT), RAPL of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) or ileo-colic artery (ICA) pedicle was measured independently by two observers. The intra-class correlation coefficient assessed the reproducibility of the measurements. Kaplan-Meier and univariate Cox regression analyses estimated overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), while univariate and multivariate linear regression models tested correlations between RAPL and clinicopathological features.

A total of 1425 patients underwent a CRC operation. Post-operative CTs were reviewed in 424 patients, with 422 (mean age 69.0 years [SD 12.3]; 54.0% males) RAPLs measured. The majority studied underwent an AR (59.2%). Excellent inter-rater reliability was noted in AR (ICC = 0.97; P < 0.001) and RH (ICC = 0.89; P < 0.001) patients. No association was observed between RAPL and OS or DFS in either group. Also, RAPL lacked association with nodal harvest in either AR (P = 0.54) or RH (P = 0.16) patients.

The value of RAPL as a quality marker of CRC surgery in non-routine CVL practice has not been confirmed. Furthermore, its lack of association with nodal harvest emphasizes the importance and the need for comprehensive pathology examination of the specimen following resection of CRC.

Background: Global colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is significant, constituting 15% of all cancer cases with 1.4 million new diagnoses annually. Recent research suggests categorizing CRC into three clinical groups: right colon cancer (RCC), left colon cancer (LCC), and rectal cancer, each with distinct embryological and molecular characteristics. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 189 patients (103 men, 86 women) undergoing surgery for RCC and LCC from January 2018 to December 2023 was performed. Results: LCC was a more common localization (98, 51.85%) than RCC (91, 48.15%). Patients with RCC were older than patients with LCC (70 (36-92, IQR 11) vs. 68 (38-84, IQR 12.5) years; p = 0.02). The duration of surgical procedure was comparable in both groups (225 (120-420, IQR 80) vs. 210 (105-505, IQR 85) minutes; p = 0.16). Complications occurred in 16 (17.58%) patients with RCC and in 15 (15.31%) patients with LCC (p = 0.72). One-year overall survival was 92.76% (SE 2.16%) (91.57% (SE 3.43%) in the RCC group and 93.99% (SE 2.61%) in the LCC group; p = 0.79). Conclusions: Colon cancer incidence is increasing globally due to economic and lifestyle factors. Our study reflects this trend, noting a rise in cases from 2018 to 2023. Despite several differences, overall survival rates do not significantly differ between RCC and LCC patients. Understanding clinical disparities is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

This study investigates the effectiveness of a three-dimensional reconstruction mathematical model (3D-IPR) for preoperative planning in locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) with threatened surgical margins. The objective was to evaluate the utility of a 3D-IPR surgical planner tool in cases of LACC with threatened surgical margins. Additionally, the study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the 3D-IPR model against conventional CT scans in determining the infiltration of neighboring structures.

This Single-center, prospective, observational, comparative, non-randomized study. INCLUSIóN CRITERIA: Patients over 18 years old undergoing surgery for LACC as indicated by a radiologist's analysis of CT scans. Preoperative confirmation of neoplasm by colonoscopy.

patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, suspected carcinomatosis on preoperative CT and patients with unresectable tumors. All patients were selected consecutively.

Intervention involved using a 3D-IPR model as a surgical planning tool for patients with LACC. The 3D-IPR provided detailed metrics about the tumor and surrounding structures to assist in surgical planning. Surgical procedures were guided by the radiological assessments from CT scans and intraoperative findings, with surgeries categorized based on surgical margins as R0, R1, or R2. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic accuracy of the 3D-IPR model in determining tumor infiltration of neighboring structures compared to conventional CT scans. The measure used to assess this outcome was the definitive pathological report of tumor infiltration, which served as the gold standard for comparison. Demographic, intraoperative, morbidity, mortality, and pathological data were analyzed.

21 patients were assessed, 1 excluded with a final sample of 20 patients. 3D-IPR model demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy for tumor infiltration of neighboring structures compared to conventional CT scans, with sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value, and Negative Predictive Value of 70 %, 90 %, 87.5 %, and 75 %, respectively. Surgeries were predominantly minimally invasive (70 %), with no major complications or mortality within 30 days, and a 0 % conversion rate to open surgery.

The 3D-IPR model significantly enhances preoperative planning accuracy, reducing the risk of incomplete resections and improving surgical outcomes. This technology offers a reliable basis for surgical decisions, potentially improving patient prognosis and survival rates.

Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) with D3 lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer is gaining acceptance. However, this procedure has not yet been standardized like total mesorectal excision. Ergonomics is very important in this surgery (e.g. patient positioning, port placement) and identification of vascular anatomy is a critical step. The aim of this work is to present ten procedural steps that are simple and reproducible.

The French position is adopted. The surgeon stands between the patient's legs. Four ports are placed: a camera port 2.5 cm to the left of the umbilicus; two working ports-a 12 mm right-hand port 5-7 cm below the umbilicus in the midline and a 5 mm left-hand port 2.5 cm medial and at the level of anterior superior iliac spine-and an assistant port at the level of the umbilicus at the pararectal line. This is most comfortable position in the 'caudal to cranial approach' for CME dissection. The right-hand instrument always dissects parallel to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) axis so there is less chance of injury to major vascular structures. When clipping the ileocolic, right colic and gastrocolic trunk (GCT) branches, the instrument is always perpendicular to these structures, giving ease of clipping and division. An intentional attempt is made to dissect all tributaries of the GCT. This avoids inadvertent injury and bleeding. Identifying the SMA/superior mesenteric vein (SMV) axis and ileocolic pedicle is the most crucial step. We use surface landmarks for this-the ligamentum teres and SMA/SMV are both midline structures. Giving traction on the transverse mesocolon just below the ligamentum makes the pulsatile SMA visible irrespective of the patient's body mass index. Giving traction at the ileocaecal junction mesentery makes the ileocolic pedicle prominent. These two landmarks for identification of the vascular anatomy make this technique unique and reproducible. CME dissection is done caudal to cranial and lateral to medial. Supracolic and lateral mobilization of the colon is simple. While starting dissection in the right paracolic gutter the already dissected CME plane make this step easier. Anastomosis can be made intracorporeal or extracorporeal.

Ergonomics and landmarks for identification of the vascular anatomy make this technique simple and reproducible.

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is being increasingly used for the treatment of right-sided colon cancer, although there is still no strong evidence that CME provides better long-term oncological outcomes than D2 dissection. The controversy is mainly regarding the survival benefit from extended lymph node dissection emphasized by CME.

This multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02619942) was performed across 17 hospitals in China. Patients diagnosed with stage T2-T4aNanyM0 or TanyN + M0 right-sided colon cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo either CME or D2 dissection during laparoscopic right colectomy. The primary outcome was the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), and the main secondary outcome was the 3-year overall survival (OS).

Between January 11, 2016, and December 26, 2019, 1,072 patients were randomly assigned (536 patients to CME and 536 patients to D2 dissection). In total, 995 patients (median age 61 years, 59% male) were included in the primary analysis (CME [n = 495] v D2 dissection [n = 500]). No significant differences were found between the groups in 3-year DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.54 to 1.02]; P = .06; 86.1% in the CME group v 81.9% in the D2 group) or in 3-year OS (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.43 to 1.16]; P = .17; 94.7% in the CME group v 92.6% in the D2 group).

This trial failed to find evidence of superior DFS outcome for CME compared with standard D2 lymph node dissection in primary surgical excision of right-sided colon cancer. Standard D2 dissection should be the routine procedure for these patients. CME should only be considered in patients with obvious mesocolic lymph node involvement.

This study aims to delineate anatomical landmarks crucial for complete mesocolic excision, focusing on Gerota's fascia, which guides surgical dissection in right-sided colon cancer, forming the posterior limit. Employing a multimodal approach, the research aims to understand the fascial anatomy and its variations under pathological conditions.

Three methods were applied: a pilot dissection on an embalmed cadaver for clear anatomical presentation of prerenal fascia, Mimics segmentation of the fascia and its relationship with the colon, and a retrospective analysis of MDCTA scans from 196 patients (mean age 65.73 y, 118 F/78 M). Systematic measurements of fascial thickness were taken at key renal levels-upper pole, hilum, lower pole, and infra-renal. Covariates analyzed included Body Mass Index, age, and sex.

The pilot dissection revealed the renal fascia of Gerota as the only true retrocolic compact connective tissue and the fusion fascia of Toldt as a mesh of strands of loose connective tissue and fat lobules. MDCTA showed clearer visualization of Gerota's fascia at the hilum and inferior renal pole, predominantly on the left. There were significant differences in fascial thickness between sides (1.30 mm on the right and 1.34 mm on the left) and a positive correlation with BMI, whereas age and sex showed no significant effects.

Gerota's fascia is a critical anatomical landmark in CME for right colon cancer. This study highlights the fascia's structural integrity, unaffected by the tumor, underscoring its importance in surgical navigation.

Ex vivo tissue morphometric (TM) measurements have been proposed as a quality marker for colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. However, their survival associations require clarification. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of capturing TM measurements based on ex vivo fresh specimen images and explore the association between these TM measurements and survival outcomes.

A prospective cohort study at Concord Hospital, Sydney was conducted with Stage I to III CRC patients (2009-2019) who underwent an anterior resection (AR) or right hemicolectomy (RH). Using high-resolution digital photographs of fresh CRC specimens, ex vivo tissue morphometric (TM) measurements-resected mesentery area (TM A), distances from high vascular tie to tumour (TM B) and bowel wall (TM C), and bowel length (TM D)-were recorded using Image J. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) estimates and their associations to clinicopathological variables were investigated with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Linear regression models tested association between TM measurements and lymph node (LN) yield.

Of the 1,425 patients who underwent CRC surgery, TM measurements were performed on 312 patients, with an average age of 69.4 years (SD 12.3), of whom 52.9% were male. The majority had an AR (57.8%). Among AR patients, a 5-year OS rate of 77.4% and a DFS rate of 70.1% were observed, with TM measurements bearing no relationship to survival outcomes. Similarly, RH patients exhibited a 5-year OS rate of 67.2% and a DFS rate of 63.1%, with TM measurements again showing no association with survival. Only TM D (P = 0.02) measurements were associated with the number of LNs examined.

This study successfully demonstrates the feasibility of measuring TM measurements on photographs of ex vivo fresh specimens following CRC surgery. The lack of association with survival outcomes questions the utility of TM measurements as a quality metric of CRC surgery.

Colon cancer is a global health concern, ranking fifth in both new diagnoses and deaths among tumors worldwide. Surgical intervention remains the primary treatment for localized cases, with a historical evolution marked by a focus on short-term outcomes. While Japan pioneered radical tumor removal with a systematic categorization of lymph nodes (D1, D2, D3), the dissemination of Japanese practices to the West was delayed until 90th of last century. Discrepancies between Japanese D3 dissection and the CME with CVL principle persist, with variations in longitudinal margins and recommended procedures. Non-randomized trials indicate the superiority of D3 over D2, but a consensus is lacking.

This prospective, international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial employs a two-arm, parallel-group, open-label design to rigorously compare the 5-year overall survival outcomes between D2 and D3 lymph node dissection in stage II-III right colon cancer. Building on prior studies, the trial aims to address existing knowledge gaps and provide a comprehensive evaluation of the outcomes associated with D3 dissection. The study population comprises patients with right colon cancer, ensuring a focused investigation into the specific context of this disease. The trial design emphasizes its global scope and collaboration across multiple centers, enhancing the generalizability of the findings.

This study's primary objective is to elucidate the potential superiority in 5-year overall survival benefits of D3 lymph node dissection compared to the conventional D2 approach in patients with stage II-III right colon cancer. By examining this specific subset of patients, the research aims to contribute valuable insights into optimizing surgical strategies for improved long-term outcomes. The trial's international and multicenter nature enhances its applicability across diverse populations. The outcomes of this study may inform future guidelines and contribute to the ongoing discourse surrounding the standardization of colon cancer surgery, particularly in the context of right colon cancer.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03200834. Registered on June 27, 2017.

In colon cancer surgery, ensuring the complete removal of the primary tumor and draining lymph nodes is crucial. Lymphatic drainage in the colon follows the vascular supply, typically progressing from pericolic to paraaortic lymph nodes. While NCCN guidelines recommend the removal of 10-12 lymph nodes for adequate oncological resection, achieving complete oncological resection involves more than just meeting these numerical targets. Various techniques have been developed and studied over time to attain optimal oncological outcomes. A key technique central to this goal is identifying the ileocolic vessels at their origin from the superior mesenteric vessels. Complete excision of the visceral and parietal mesocolon ensures the intact removal of the specimen, while D3 lymphadenectomy targets all draining regional lymph nodes. Although these principles emphasize different aspects, they ultimately converge to achieve the same goal of complete oncological resection. This article aims to simplify the surgical steps that align with the principle of central vascular ligation and mesocolon mobilization while ensuring adequate D3 dissection.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has numerous applications in pathology, supporting diagnosis and prognostication in cancer. However, most AI models are trained on highly selected data, typically one tissue slide per patient. In reality, especially for large surgical resection specimens, dozens of slides can be available for each patient. Manually sorting and labelling whole-slide images (WSIs) is a very time-consuming process, hindering the direct application of AI on the collected tissue samples from large cohorts. In this study we addressed this issue by developing a deep-learning (DL)-based method for automatic curation of large pathology datasets with several slides per patient.

We collected multiple large multicentric datasets of colorectal cancer histopathological slides from the United Kingdom (FOXTROT, N = 21,384 slides; CR07, N = 7985 slides) and Germany (DACHS, N = 3606 slides). These datasets contained multiple types of tissue slides, including bowel resection specimens, endoscopic biopsies, lymph node resections, immunohistochemistry-stained slides, and tissue microarrays. We developed, trained, and tested a deep convolutional neural network model to predict the type of slide from the slide overview (thumbnail) image. The primary statistical endpoint was the macro-averaged area under the receiver operating curve (AUROCs) for detection of the type of slide.

In the primary dataset (FOXTROT), with an AUROC of 0.995 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.994-0.996] the algorithm achieved a high classification performance and was able to accurately predict the type of slide from the thumbnail image alone. In the two external test cohorts (CR07, DACHS) AUROCs of 0.982 [95% CI: 0.979-0.985] and 0.875 [95% CI: 0.864-0.887] were observed, which indicates the generalizability of the trained model on unseen datasets. With a confidence threshold of 0.95, the model reached an accuracy of 94.6% (7331 classified cases) in CR07 and 85.1% (2752 classified cases) for the DACHS cohort.

Our findings show that using the low-resolution thumbnail image is sufficient to accurately classify the type of slide in digital pathology. This can support researchers to make the vast resource of existing pathology archives accessible to modern AI models with only minimal manual annotations.

The optimum surgical approach to splenic flexure cancers (SFCs) remains uncertain. The aim of this survey was to explore the opinions of an international surgical community on the management and outcomes of SFC.

A questionnaire was constructed comprising five sections (information about respondents; definition and prognosis of SFC; operative approach; approach in specific scenarios; outcomes) and circulated through an international dissemination committee and social media.

The survey received 576 responses over 4 weeks across 50 countries. There was no consensus regarding the definition of the splenic flexure, whilst the proportion of respondents who did and did not think that patients with SFC had a worse outcome was equal. The overall preferred operative approach was left hemicolectomy [203 (35.2%)], followed by segmental resection [167 (29%)], extended right hemicolectomy [126 (21.9%)] and subtotal colectomy [7 (12%)]. The stated pedicles for ligation varied between resection types and also within the same resection. One hundred and sixty-six (28.8%) respondents thought a segmental resection was associated with the worst survival and 190 (33%) thought it was associated with the best quality of life.

This survey confirms a lack of consensus across all aspects SFC treatment. The differing approaches described are likely to represent different beliefs around the variable anatomy of this region and the associated lymphatic drainage. Future studies are required to address such inconsistencies and identify the optimum surgical strategy, whilst also incorporating quality-of-life metrics and patient-reported outcomes. A one-size-fits-all approach is probably not appropriate with SFC, and a more bespoke approach is required.

According to the concept of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer, Hohenberger translated this concept to colonic cancer by introducing complete mesocolic excision (CME). The concept of this surgical technique was further elucidated by Benz et al. in the form of an open book approach. This article presents and demonstrates in a video a case of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME and D3 lymphadenectomy using open book approach in the treatment of a T3N1M0 distal ascending colonic adenocarcinoma. The final pathology report confirmed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma with a maximum tumor size of 55 mm and 0/60 lymph nodes. The mesocolic fascia was intact and R0 was achieved. The final staging was pT3pN0pM0. However, D3 lymphadenectomy is not universally adopted due to concerns of higher morbidity we believe that with adequate training and supervision CME with D3 LDN is feasible and safe to be offered to all right-sided colorectal cancers with curative intent treatment.

According to Hohenberger's original description, complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer involves precise dissection of the avascular embryonic plane between the parietal retroperitoneum and visceral peritoneum of the mesocolon. This ensures mesocolic integrity, access to high ligation of the supplying vessels at their origin and an associated extended lymphadenectomy. Results from centres which have adopted this approach routinely have demonstrated that oncological outcomes can be improved by the rigorous implementation of established principles of cancer surgery. Meticulous anatomical dissection along embryonic planes is a well-established principle of precision cancer surgery used routinely by the specialist colorectal surgeon. Therefore, the real question concerns the need for true central vascular ligation and associated extended (D3) lymphadenectomy or otherwise, particularly along the superior mesenteric vessels when performing a right colectomy. Whether this approach results in improved overall or disease-free survival remains unclear and its role remains controversial particularly given the potential for significant morbidity associated with a more extensive central vascular dissection. Current literature is limited by considerable bias, as well as inconsistent and variable terminology, and the results of established randomized trials are awaited. As a result of the current state of equipoise, various national guidelines have disparate recommendations as to when complete mesocolic excision should be performed if at all. This article aims to review the rationale for and technical aspects of complete mesocolic excision, summarize available short and long term outcome data and address current controversies.

The modified complete mesocolic excision (mCME) procedure for right-sided colon cancer is a tailored approach based on the original complete mesocolic excision (CME) methodology. Limited studies evaluated the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic mCME using objective surgical quality assessments in patients with right colon cancer. The objectives of the PIONEER study were to evaluate oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic mCME and to identify optimal clinically relevant endpoints and values for standardizing laparoscopic right colon cancer surgery based on short-term outcomes of procedures performed by expert laparoscopic surgeons.

This is an ongoing prospective, multi-institutional, single-arm study conducted at five tertiary colorectal cancer centers in South Korea. Study registrants included 250 patients scheduled for laparoscopic mCME with right-sided colon adenocarcinoma (from the appendix to the proximal half of the transverse colon). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival. Secondary outcomes included 3-year overall survival, incidence of morbidity in the first 4 weeks postoperatively, completeness of mCME, central radicality, and distribution of metastatic lymph nodes. Survival data will be available after the final follow-up date (June 2024).

The postoperative complication rate was 12.9%, with a major complication rate of 2.7%. In 87% of patients, central radicality was achieved with dissection at or beyond the level of complete exposure of the superior mesenteric vein. Mesocolic plane resection with an intact mesocolon was achieved in 75.9% of patients, as assessed through photographs. Metastatic lymph node distribution varied by tumor location and extent. Seven optimal clinically relevant endpoints and values were identified based on the analysis of complications in low-risk patients.

Laparoscopic mCME for right-sided colon cancer produced favorable short-term postoperative outcomes. The identified optimal clinically relevant endpoints and values can serve as a reference for evaluating surgical performance of this procedure.

Colon cancer is a disease with a worldwide spread. Surgery is the best option for the treatment of advanced colon cancer, but some aspects are still debated, such as the extent of lymphadenectomy. In Japanese guidelines, the gold standard was D3 dissection to remove the central lymph nodes (203, 213, and 223), but in 2009, Hoenberger et al. introduced the concept of complete mesocolic excision, in which surgical dissection follows the embryological planes to remove the mesentery entirely to prevent leakage of cancer cells and collect more lymph nodes. Our study describes how lymphadenectomy is currently performed in major Italian centers with an unclear indication on the type of lymphadenectomy that should be performed during right hemicolectomy (RH).

CoDIG 2 is an observational multicenter national study that involves 76 Italian general surgery wards highly specialized in colorectal surgery. Each center was asked not to modify their usual surgical and clinical practices. The aim of the study was to assess the preference of Italian surgeons on the type of lymphadenectomy to perform during RH and the rise of any new trends or modifications in habits compared to the findings of the CoDIG 1 study conducted 4 years ago.

A total of 788 patients were enrolled. The most commonly used surgical technique was laparoscopic (82.1%) with intracorporeal (73.4%), side-to-side (98.7%), or isoperistaltic (96.0%) anastomosis. The lymph nodes at the origin of the vessels were harvested in an inferior number of cases (203, 213, and 223: 42.4%, 31.1%, and 20.3%, respectively). A comparison between CoDIG 1 and CoDIG 2 showed a stable trend in surgical techniques and complications, with an increase in the robotic approach (7.7% vs. 12.3%).

This analysis shows how lymphadenectomy is performed in Italy to achieve oncological outcomes in RH, although the technique to achieve a higher lymph node count has not yet been standardized. Trial registration (ClinicalTrials.gov) ID: NCT05943951.

Debate regarding the risks and merits of complete mesocolic excision and extended lymphadenectomy is ongoing, particularly for right-sided colon cancers. In this article, we hope to provide a succinct yet encompassing review of the relevant literature. We posit that complete mesocolic excision with D3 dissection is indicated in select patients with colon cancers, particularly those distal to the cecum.

Positive pathologic lymph nodes in colorectal cancer represent an important prognostic indicator. Whether lymph node distribution or the number of metastatic nodes is more strongly associated with survival prediction remains controversial.

Among 3449 colorectal cancer surgeries performed at Nagasaki University Hospital and five affiliated institutions from April 2016 to March 2022, we investigated 604 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection and were diagnosed with pathological stage III cancer. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had central vessel metastasis (LND3 group, n=42) or not (LND1/2 group, n=562). After adjusting for background factors using propensity score matching, the LND3 group included 42 patients and the LND1/2 group included 40 patients. Patient background characteristics and prognosis were compared between these two groups.

Before matching, frequencies of right-side colon cancer (64.3% vs 38.1%, p=0.001), multivisceral resection (11.9% vs 4.4%, p=0.039), clinical N2 status (40.5% vs 22.6%, p=0.032), and pathological N2 (73.8% vs 22.6%, p<0.001) were all greater, and the number of lymph nodes retrieved was higher (24 vs 19, p=0.042) in the LND3 group. After matching, no differences in any clinical factors were evident between groups. Five-year RFS (44.8% vs 77.1%, p=0.004) and OS (43.1% vs 83.2%, p<0.001) were worse in the LND3 group. Adjuvant chemotherapy improved RFS (adjuvant chemotherapy (+) vs adjuvant chemotherapy (-): 62.1% vs 27.7%, p=0.047) in the LND3 group.

LND3-positive patients show poorer prognosis than LND1/2 patients and should be treated with an appropriate perioperative treatment strategy.

Conventional laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy requires a small abdominal incision to extract the specimen, which becomes an important source of postoperative complications and impairs perioperative experience. Transvaginal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES VIIIA) avoids this small incision by extracting the specimen through the vagina. Here we describe the design of a multicenter, open-label, parallel, noninferior, phase III randomized controlled trial (NCT05495048). The aim of this study is to confirm that the NOSES VIIIA procedure is not inferior to small-incision assisted right hemicolectomy in long-term oncological efficacy. A total of 352 female patients with right colon adenocarcinoma/high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia will be randomly assigned to the NOSES VIIIA arm and the small-incision arm in a 1:1 ratio. The primary end point of this trial is 3 year disease-free survival. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05495048 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Colonic stenting reduces morbidity and stoma formation for left-sided colon cancer obstruction, and a prolonged interval between stenting and surgery with neoadjuvant chemotherapy administered might result in a lower stoma rate and tumor reduction.

The study aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of elective surgery following colonic stenting compared with elective surgery following colonic stenting and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with left-sided colon cancer obstruction.

This is a prospective multicenter cohort study.

This study was conducted at 5 medical centers.

Patients ( n = 100) with acute left-sided colon cancer obstruction undergoing colonic stenting between December 2015 and December 2019 were included.

Patients were assigned to the stenting-alone or chemotherapy group.

The primary outcomes measured were laparoscopic surgery and stoma rate.

Of the 100 patients who underwent colonic stenting, 52 were assigned to the stenting group and 48 were assigned to the chemotherapy group. No statistically significant differences were detected in stent-related complications. The adverse events associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were well tolerated. The level of hemoglobin (117.2 vs 107.6 g/L; p = 0.008), albumin (34.2 vs 31.5 g/L; p < 0.001), and prealbumin (0.19 vs 0.16 g/L; p = 0.001) was significantly increased, and the bowel wall thickness (1.09 vs 2.04 mm; p < 0.001) was significantly decreased preoperatively in the chemotherapy group compared with the stenting group. The number of mean harvested lymph nodes was greater in the chemotherapy group than in the stenting group (25.6 vs 21.8; p = 0.04). Laparoscopic surgery was performed more frequently (77.1% vs 40.4%; p < 0.001) and a stoma was created less frequently (10.4% vs 28.8%; p = 0.02) in the chemotherapy group than in the stenting group.

This trial was limited by the nonrandomized design and a short follow-up period.

This study suggests that elective surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and colonic stenting is a safe, effective, and well-tolerated treatment approach with a high laparoscopic resection rate and a low stoma rate. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B980 .

ANTECEDENTES:La colocación de stents colónicos reduce la morbilidad y la formación de estomas por obstrucción por cáncer de colon izquierdo, y el intervalo prolongado entre la colocación de stents y la cirugía con quimioterapia neoadyuvante administrada podría resultar en una menor tasa de estomas y reducción del tumor.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los resultados a corto plazo de la cirugía electiva después de la colocación de stent en el colon en comparación con la cirugía electiva después de la colocación de stent en el colon y la quimioterapia neoadyuvante en pacientes con obstrucción por cáncer de colon izquierdo.DISEÑO:Estudio prospectivo de cohorte multicéntrico.ENTORNO CLINICO:Este estudio se realizó en 5 centros médicos.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes (n=100) con obstrucción aguda por cáncer de colon izquierdo que se sometieron a colocación de stent colónico entre diciembre de 2015 y diciembre de 2019.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes fueron asignados al grupo de stent solo o quimioterapia.MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO PRINCIPALES:Los resultados primarios medidos fueron la cirugía laparoscópica y la tasa de ostomía.RESULTADOS:De los 100 pacientes que se sometieron a la colocación de stent colónico, 52 fueron asignados al grupo de colocación de stent y 48 al grupo de quimioterapia. No se detectaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en las complicaciones relacionadas con el stent. Los eventos adversos asociados con la quimioterapia neoadyuvante fueron bien tolerados. Hemoglobina (117,2 g/l vs. 107,6 g/l; p = 0,008), albúmina (34,2 g/l vs. 31,5 g/l; p < 0,001) y prealbúmina (0,19 g/l vs. 0,16 g/l; p = 0,001) aumentaron significativamente y el grosor de la pared intestinal (1,09 mm vs. 2,04 mm; p < 0,001) disminuyó significativamente antes de la operación en el grupo de quimioterapia en comparación con el grupo de colocación de stent. El número medio de ganglios linfáticos extraídos fue mayor en el grupo de quimioterapia que en el grupo de stent (25,6 vs. 21,8; p = 0,04). La cirugía laparoscópica se realizó con mayor frecuencia (77,1 % vs. 40,4 %; p < 0,001) y se creó un estoma con menos frecuencia (10,4 % vs. 28,8 % ; p = 0,02) en el grupo de quimioterapia que en el grupo de colocación de stent.LIMITACIONES:Este ensayo estuvo limitado por el diseño no aleatorio y el corto período de seguimiento.CONCLUSIONES:Este estudio sugiere que la cirugía electiva después de la quimioterapia neoadyuvante y la colocación de stent colónico es un tratamiento seguro, efectivo y bien tolerado, con una alta tasa de resección laparoscópica y una baja tasa de estoma. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B980 . (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).

Colon cancer is a common disease internationally. Outcomes have not improved to the same degree as in rectal cancer, where the focus on total mesorectal excision and pathological feedback has significantly contributed to improved survival and reduced local recurrence. Colon cancer surgery shows significant variation around the world, with differences in mesocolic integrity, height of the vascular ligation and length of the bowel resected. This leads to variation in well-recognised quality measures like lymph node yield. Pathologists are able to assess all of these variables and are ideally placed to provide feedback to surgeons and the wider multidisciplinary team to improve surgical quality over time. With a move towards complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation to remove the primary tumour and all mechanisms of spread within an intact package, pathological feedback will be central to improving outcomes for patients with operable colon cancer. This review focusses on the key quality measures and the evidence that underpins them.

Colon and rectal cancer imaging has traditionally been performed to assess for distant disease (typically lung and liver metastases) and to assess the resectability of the primary tumor. With technological and scientific advances in imaging and the evolution of treatment options, the role of imaging has expanded. Radiologists are now expected to provide a precise description of primary tumor invasion extent, including adjacent organ invasion, involvement of the surgical resection plane, extramural vascular invasion, lymphadenopathy, and response to neoadjuvant treatment, and to monitor for recurrence after clinical complete response.

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) involves sharp dissection through the embryological planes. However, it may be associated with high mortalities and morbidities especially in colorectal emergencies. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of CME with CVL in complicated colorectal cancers (CRCs). This was a retrospective study of emergency CRC resection in a tertiary center between March 2016 and November 2018. A total of 46 patients, with a mean age of 51 years, underwent an emergency colectomy for cancer (males, 26 [56.5%]; females, 20 [43.5%]). CME with CVL was performed for all patients. The mean operative time and blood loss were 188 min and 397 mL, respectively. Only five (10.8%) patients presented with burst abdomen, whereas only three (6.5%) presented with anastomotic leakage. The mean length of vascular tie was 8.7 cm, and the mean number of harvested lymph nodes (LNs) was 21.2. Emergency CME with CVL is a safe and feasible technique when performed by a colorectal surgeon and will result in obtaining a superior specimen with a large number of LNs.

Despite its potential oncologic benefit, complete mesocolic excision (CME) has rarely been offered to elderly patients. The present study evaluated the effect of age on postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing laparoscopic right colectomies with CME for right-sided colon cancer (RCC).

Data of patients undergoing laparoscopic right colectomies with CME for RCC between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Selected patients were divided into two groups: the under-80 group and the over-80 group. Surgical, pathological, and oncological outcomes among the groups were compared.

A total of 130 patients were selected (95 in the under-80 group and 35 in the over-80 group). No difference was found between the groups in terms of postoperative outcomes, except for median length of stay and adjuvant chemotherapy received, which were in favor of the under-80 group (5 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001 and 26.3% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.003, respectively). No difference between the groups was found regarding overall survival and disease free survival. Using multivariate analysis, only the ASA score > 2 (p = 0.01) was an independent predictor of overall complications.

laparoscopic right colectomy with CME for RCC was safely performed in elderly patients ensuring similar oncological outcomes compared to younger patients.

The purpose of this study was to compare the "caudal to cranial" (CC) versus "medial to lateral" (ML) approach for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Pertinent data from all patients with stage II and III between January 2015 and August 2017 were entered into a retrospective database. A total of 175 patients underwent the ML (N = 109) or CC approach (N = 66). Patient characteristics were equivalent between groups. The CC group showed a shorter surgical time 170.00 (145.00, 210.00) vs. (206.50 (178.75, 226.25) min) than the ML group (p < 0.001). The time to oral intake was shorter in the CC group than in the ML group ((3.00 (1.00, 4.00) vs. 3.00 (2.00, 5.00) days; p = 0.007). For the total harvested lymph nodes, there was no statistical significance between the CC group 16.50 (14.00, 21.25) and the ML group 18.00 (15.00, 22.00) (p = 0.327), and no difference was found in the positive harvested lymph nodes (0 (0, 2.00) vs. 0 (0, 1.50); p = 0.753). Meanwhile, no differences were found in other perioperative or pathological outcomes, including blood loss and complications. For 5-year prognosis, overall survival rates were 75.76% in the CC group and 82.57% in the ML group (HR 0.654, 95% CI 0.336-1.273, p = 0.207); disease-free survival rates were 80.30% in the CC group and 85.32% in the ML group (HR 0.683, 95% CI 0.328-1.422, p = 0.305). Both approaches were safe and feasible and resulted in excellent survival. The CC approach was beneficial in terms of the surgical time and time to oral intake.

Several procedures have been proposed to reduce the rates of recurrence in patients with right-sided colon cancer. Different procedures for a radical right colectomy (RRC), including extended D3 lymphadenectomy, complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation have been associated with survival benefits by some authors, but results are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to assess the variability in definition and reporting of RRC, which might be responsible for significant differences in outcome evaluation.

PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review to identify the definitions of RRC. Primary aims were to identify surgical steps and different nomenclature for RRC. Secondary aims were description of heterogeneity and overlap among different RRC techniques.

Ninety-nine articles satisfied inclusion criteria. Eight surgical steps were identified and recorded as specific to RRC: Central arterial ligation was described in 100% of the included studies; preservation of mesocolic integrity in 73% and dissection along the SMV plane in 67%. Other surgical steps were inconstantly reported. Six differently named techniques for RRC have been identified. There were 35 definitions for the 6 techniques and 40% of these were used to identify more than one technique.

The only universally adopted surgical step for RRC is central arterial ligation. There is great heterogeneity and consistent overlap among definitions of all RRC techniques. This is likely to jeopardise the interpretation of the outcomes of studies on the topic. Consistent use of definitions and reporting of procedures are needed to obtain reliable conclusions in future trials. PROSPERO CRD42021241650.

The concept of complete mesocolic excision (CME) and central vascular ligation (CVL) in right colonic resections appears to improve the oncological outcomes. The highest rate of complications reported in the literature in patients undergoing CME is related to difficult surgical manuevers and intraoperative bleeding due to the central vascular dissection.

We used preoperative findings obtained with the CT angiography, multiplanar reformation (MPR), maximum intesity projection (MIP) and 3D volume rendering (VR) technique to verify if this preoperative radiological assessment had significant benefits regarding the difficulty of dissection of the embryological planes, the identification of vascular structures and central lymph nodes with reduction in mean operative time, intraoperative complications and better short-term outcomes versus standard contrast enhanced CT scan. We also have administered a questionnaire to investigate the subjective responses on the degree of difficulty of the surgical procedure both by the surgical team expert in CME and by a group of young surgeons.

Statistical analysis showed that overall operative time was significant shorter in patients underwent to radiological assessment (224,5 min; range 160-300 versus 252,6 min; range 200-340; p-value 0.023) with a significant lower rate of intraoperative complication (2.7% versus 4.2%; p-value 0.043). No differences were reported with respect to blood loss, conversion rate, anastomotic leakage or other surgical results. Analysis of the questionnaire underlined a progressive awareness of the correspondence between the radiological imaging and the surgical field.

The possibility of identifying the characteristics and course of the vascular structures along the axis of the superior mesenteric vessels certainly increases the surgeon's knowledge of the operating field, making him more confident with surgical maneuvers and significantly reducing the duration of the operating time and intraoperative complications.

Microscopically positive (R1) margins to lymph node metastases (R1LNM) are associated with poorer oncological outcomes in patients with Stage III colon cancer. R1LNM margins are more common in right-sided cancer, although the cause of this phenomenon is unknown. We sought to investigate whether differences in surgical quality account for the higher rate of R1LNM in right-sided cancers.

Patients treated for Stage III colon cancer from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018 were identified using the Danish national cancer registry. Indicators of surgical quality (mesocolic resection grade, median lymph node yield, and length to the distal colonic margin) were compared according to tumour site and margin status.

In all, 1765 patients were included, 981 (55.6%) with right-sided cancers. R1LNM margins were more common in right-sided cancers (14.4% vs. 6.1%, P < 0.001). All three surgical quality indicators were higher in patients with right-sided cancers (mesocolic resection planes 81.7% vs. 69.5%, P < 0.001; median lymph node yield 28 vs. 25, P < 0.001; ≥5 cm to the distal colon margin 81.2% vs. 53.6%, P < 0.001). When stratified according to margin status, no differences in mesocolic resection planes or resectate length were noted, whilst median lymph node yield was higher in patients with R1LNM margins (29 vs. 27, P = 0.009).

Surgical quality does not appear to be poorer in patients undergoing surgery for right-sided versus left-sided colon cancers in Denmark. Suboptimal surgery does not appear to be responsible for R1LNM margins, implying that these margins may be a surrogate for more aggressive biology.

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right colonic cancer is a more complex operation than standard right hemicolectomy but evidence to support its routine use is still limited. This prospective multicentre study evaluated the effect of CME on long-term survival in colorectal cancer centres in Germany (RESECTAT trial). The primary hypothesis was that 5-year disease-free survival would be higher after CME than non-CME surgery. A secondary hypothesis was that there would be improved survival of patients with a mesenteric area greater than 15 000 mm2.

Centres were asked to continue their current surgical practices. The surgery was classified as CME if the superior mesenteric vein was dissected; otherwise it was assumed that no CME had been performed. All specimens were shipped to one institution for pathological analysis and documentation. Clinical data were recorded in an established registry for quality assurance. The primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival for stages I-III. Multivariable adjustment for group allocation was planned. Using a primary hypothesis of an increase in disease-free survival from 60 to 70 per cent, a sample size of 662 patients was calculated with a 50 per cent anticipated drop-out rate.

A total of 1004 patients from 53 centres were recruited for the final analysis (496 CME, 508 no CME). Most operations (88.4 per cent) were done by an open approach. Anastomotic leak occurred in 3.4 per cent in the CME and 1.8 per cent in the non-CME group. There were slightly more lymph nodes found in CME than non-CME specimens (mean 55.6 and 50.4 respectively). Positive central mesenteric nodes were detected more in non-CME than CME specimens (5.9 versus 4.0 per cent). One-fifth of patients had died at the time of study with recorded recurrences (63, 6.3 per cent), too few to calculate disease-free survival (the original primary outcome), so overall survival (not disease-specific) results are presented. Short-term and overall survival were similar in the CME and non-CME groups. Adjusted Cox regression indicated a possible benefit for overall survival with CME in stage III disease (HR 0.52, 95 per cent c.i. 0.31 to 0.85; P = 0.010) but less so for disease-free survival (HR 0.66; P = 0.068). The secondary outcome (15 000 mm2 mesenteric size) did not influence survival at any stage (removal of more mesentery did not alter survival).

No general benefit of CME could be established. The observation of better overall survival in stage III on unplanned exploratory analysis is of uncertain significance.

Treatment for early colon cancer has progressed rapidly, with endoscopic resection and minimally invasive surgery. It is important to select patients without risk of lymph node metastasis before deciding on endoscopic resection for early colon cancer treatment. Pathological risk factors include histologic grade of cancer cell differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor budding, and deep submucosal invasion. These risk factors for predicting lymph node metastasis are crucial for determining the treatment strategy of endoscopic excision and radical resection for early colon cancer. A multidisciplinary approach is emphasized to establish a treatment strategy for early colon cancer to minimize the risk of complications and obtain excellent oncologic outcomes by selecting an appropriate treatment optimized for the patient's stage and condition. Therefore, we aimed to review the optimal multidisciplinary treatment strategies, including endoscopy and surgery, for early colon cancer.

A causal treatment effect of complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer on the risk of recurrence has been shown, but it is still unclear whether this is caused solely by a risk reduction of local recurrence.

The goal of this study was to assess to what extent complete mesocolic excision contributes to the risk of local recurrence.

This study was a posthoc analyses of data from a population-based cohort. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and competing risk analyses were used to estimate the possible causal effects of complete mesocolic excision.

Data were collected from the 4 public colorectal cancer centers in the Capital Region of Denmark.

Patients undergoing elective colon resections for right-sided colon cancer without distant metastases during the period 2010-2013 were included. One center performed complete mesocolic excision and the remaining 3 centers performed conventional resections.

The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of solely local recurrence 5.2 years after surgery. Secondary outcomes were solely distant recurrence and both local and distant recurrence diagnosed within 180 days.

A total of 807 patients were included with 186 undergoing complete mesocolic excision and 621 conventional resections. The 5.2-year cumulative incidence of a solely local recurrence was 3.7% (95% CI, 0.5-6.1) after complete mesocolic excision compared with 7.0% (5.0-8.9) in the control group, and the absolute risk reduction of complete mesocolic excision was 3.7% (2.5-7.1; p = 0.035). The absolute risk reduction on local and distant recurrence was 3.4% (1.3-5.6; p = 0.002) and on solely distant recurrence was 3.1% (0.0-6.2; p = 0.052).

The recurrence risk after conventional resection might be underestimated by the use of inappropriate modalities to diagnose local recurrence for some patients and the shorter duration in this group.

This study shows a causal treatment effect of complete mesocolic excision on the risk of a solely local recurrence and of distant recurrence with or without local recurrence. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B832 .RIESGO DE RECURRENCIA LOCAL DESPUÉS DE LA ESCISIÓN MESOCÓLICA COMPLETA PARA EL CÁNCER DE COLON DEL LADO DERECHO: ANÁLISIS DE SENSIBILIDAD POST-HOC DE UN ESTUDIO POBLACIONALANTECEDENTES:Se ha demostrado un efecto del tratamiento causal de la escisión mesocólica completa para el cáncer de colon del lado derecho sobre el riesgo de recurrencia, pero aún no está claro si esto se debe únicamente a una reducción del riesgo de recurrencia local.OBJETIVO:Evaluar en qué medida la escisión mesocólica completa se atribuye al riesgo de recurrencia local.DISEÑO:Análisis posthoc de datos de una cohorte poblacional. Se utilizaron análisis de probabilidad inversa de ponderación del tratamiento y de riesgo competitivo para estimar los posibles efectos causales de la escisión mesocólica completa.AJUSTE:Datos de los cuatro centros públicos de cáncer colorrectal en la Región Capital de Dinamarca.PACIENTES:Pacientes sometidos a resecciones de colon electivas por cáncer de colon derecho sin metástasis a distancia durante el período 2010-2013. Un centro realizó escisión mesocólica completa, el resto resecciones convencionales.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue la incidencia acumulada de la recidiva local únicamente, 5,2 años después de la cirugía. Los resultados secundarios fueron únicamente la recidiva a distancia y ambas,la recidiva local y a distancia diagnosticada dentro de los 180 días.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron un total de 807 pacientes, 186 sometidos a escisión mesocólica completa y 621 resecciones convencionales. La incidencia acumulada de 5,2 años de una recidiva únicamente local fue del 3,7% (IC del 95%: 0,5 a 6,1) después de la escisión mesocólica completa en comparación con el 7,0% (5,0 a 8,9) en el grupo de control, y la reducción del riesgo absoluto de la escisión mesocólica completa fue del 3,7% (2,5-7,1; p = 0,035). La reducción del riesgo absoluto de recidiva local y distante fue del 3,4% (1,3-5,6; p = 0,0019) y de recidiva únicamente a distancia 3,1% (0,0-6,2; p = 0,052).LIMITANTES:El riesgo de recurrencia después de la resección convencional podría subestimarse por el uso de modalidades inapropiadas para el diagnostico de la recurrencia local en algunos pacientes y la duración más corta en este grupo.CONCLUSIÓN:Este estudio muestra un efecto del tratamiento causal de la escisión mesocólica completa sobre el riesgo de una recidiva únicamente local y de recidiva a distancia con o sin recidiva local. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B832 . (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

Complete mesocolic excision with D3 lymph node dissection in right-sided colon cancer is associated with improved oncological outcomes, but can potentially be associated with higher rates of complications compared to conventional D2 right hemicolectomy. This study aims to evaluate the oncological and perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent D3 right hemicolectomy, comparing to conventional right hemicolectomy.

From 2015 to 2020, 360 patients underwent right hemicolectomy for colonic malignancies. Data was retrospectively analysed from a prospectively collected database. A propensity-score-matched analysis was performed between the two groups to evaluate their outcomes.

About 88(24.4%) patients underwent D3 right hemicolectomy, with the rest undergoing D2 right hemicolectomy. After propensity-matched analysis, D3 right hemicolectomy had a higher lymph node yield (median of 26 versus 23, p = 0.005), lower overall recurrence rate (11.7% versus 25.7%, p = 0.03), and lower overall mortality rate (14.5% versus 30.1%, p = 0.02) There were no significant differences in the complication rates. There were no anastomotic leaks. D3 right hemicolectomy was associated with an improved 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) with a hazard ratio of 0.63 (P = 0.21), and also an improved 3-year overall survival (OS) with a hazard ratio of 0.68 (P = 0.31).

D3 right hemicolectomy is associated with a higher lymph node yield, without increasing morbidity or mortality. It is also associated with significantly lower recurrence and overall mortality rates in this study. Short term 3-year DFS and OS also trend towards favouring D3 right hemicolectomy. However, this study is limited by the small sample size and retrospective nature.

Exact lymph node staging is essential in rectal cancer therapy.

The aim of the study was to assess the impact of intra-arterial indigo carmine injection after transanal total mesorectal excision on the number of retrieved lymph nodes.

This was a retrospective, nonrandomized study.

The study was conducted at a tertiary hospital by a multidisciplinary team.

Patients who underwent transanal total mesorectal excision for suspected rectal cancer between 2013 and 2019 were included.

Rectal cancer specimens received ex vivo intra-arterial indigo carmine injection to stain lymph nodes.

Outcome measures included the number of retrieved lymph nodes with or without staining.

Specimens of 189 patients were analyzed, of which 108 (57.1%) were stained with indigo carmine. A mean of 19.8 ± 6.1 lymph nodes was identified in stained samples compared to 16.0 ± 4.9 without staining ( p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that 3.2 additional lymph nodes were found in stained specimens (95% CI: 1.0 to 5.3; p = 0.02). In stained specimens the adequate lymph node count (≥12) was increased in univariable (odds ratio: 3.24, 95% CI: 1.13 to 10.65; p = 0.03) but not in multivariable analysis. Indigo carmine injection had no effect on the number of positive lymph nodes or the nodal stage. Chemoradiotherapy reduced the lymph node count by 2.5 ( p = 0.008). After staining, 95.0% of patients with chemoradiotherapy had ≥12 lymph nodes retrieved. The median follow-up of patients was 24.2 months with a local recurrence rate of 3.3%.

The study is limited by its retrospective design and the nonrandomized allocation.

Ex vivo intra-arterial indigo carmine injection increases the number of isolated lymph nodes after transanal total mesorectal excision regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Indigo carmine injection is not associated with nodal upstaging or an increased number of tumor-positive lymph nodes. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B839 .

ANTECEDENTES:La estadificación exacta de los ganglios linfáticos es esencial en la tratamiento del cáncer de recto.OBJETIVO:El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar el impacto de la inyección intraarterial de índigo carmín después de la escisión total del mesorrecto por vía transanal con relación al número de ganglios linfáticos recuperados en el espécimen quirúrgico..DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo no aleatorizado.AJUSTE:El estudio se llevó a cabo en un hospital de tercer nivel por un equipo multidisciplinario.PACIENTES:Pacientes a quienes se les practicó escisión total del mesorrecto por vía transanal por sospecha de cáncer de recto entre 2013 y 2019.INTERVENCIONES:Al espécimen quirúrgico que se obtuvo, se le practicó inyección intraarterial ex vivo, de índigo carmín para teñir los ganglios linfáticos.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El número de ganglios linfáticos recuperados con o sin tinción.RESULTADOS:Se analizaron muestras de 189 pacientes, de los cuales 108 (57,1%) fueron teñidos con índigo carmín. Se identificó una media de 19,8 ± 6,1 ganglios linfáticos en las muestras teñidas en comparación con 16,0 ± 4,9 sin tinción ( p < 0,001). El análisis multivariado mostró que se encontraron 3.2 ganglios linfáticos adicionales en las muestras teñidas (intervalo de confianza del 95%: 1,0 a 5,3; p = 0,02). En las muestras teñidas, el recuento adecuado de ganglios linfáticos (≥12) aumentó en el análisis univariado (razón de posibilidades: 3,24, intervalo de confianza del 95%: 1,13 a 10,65; p = 0,03) pero no en el multivariado. La inyección de índigo carmín no tuvo ningún efecto sobre el número de ganglios linfáticos positivos o el estadio ganglionar. La quimiorradioterapia redujo el recuento de ganglios linfáticos en 2,5 ( p = 0,008). Después de la tinción, en el 95,0% de los pacientes con quimiorradioterapia se recuperaron ≥12 ganglios linfáticos. La mediana de seguimiento de los pacientes fue de 24,2 meses con una tasa de recurrencia local del 3,3%.LIMITACIONES:El estudio está limitado por su diseño retrospectivo y la asignación no aleatoria.CONCLUSIONES:La inyección ex vivo de índigo carmín intraarterial aumenta el número de ganglios linfáticos aislados después de la escisión total del mesorrectal por vía transanal a pesar de la quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante. La inyección de índigo carmín no se asocia con un aumento del estadio de los ganglios ni con un mayor número de ganglios linfáticos positivos para tumor. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B839 . (Traducción-Eduardo Londoño-Schimmer ).

It remains a technical challenge to perform "superior mesenteric artery (SMA) first" approach for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolon excision (CME) as the vascular anatomy of the right colon varies a lot, which may cause difficulty in early location of SMA and the risk of vascular damage during central vascular ligation (CVL). The purpose of this study was to describe a new "SMA first" approach for laparoscopic CME with CVL in right hemicolectomy with Treitz's ligament and ileocolic vascular pedicle as the anatomical landmarks for early identification of and exposure of SMA.

This procedure was performed on 21 patients with right colon cancer between March 2020 and August 2021. To start, the transverse mesocolon was retracted to expose the ligament of Treitz, and the pedicle of ileocolic vessels was anteriorly grasped. Next, the peritoneum near the right border of the ligament of Treitz was divided along the left side of SMA until the peritoneum below the ileocolic vessels. Next, the mesenteric lymphatic adipose tissue outside of the sheath of SMA was dissected from medial to lateral. Then, laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME) was performed. Patients' preoperative baseline characteristics and intraoperative and postoperative complications were examined.

The median operative time was 180 min, and the median intraoperative blood loss was 50 ml (interquartile range 40-90). Chylous leakage occurred in four patients, and all the patients resolved with percutaneous drainage. The total harvested lymph nodes was 21.0 (range 16-27). The median times to first flatus and liquid diet intake were both 3.0 days. The median number of postoperative hospital days was 10.0 days. No severe postoperative complications, such as abdominal infection, anastomotic leakage, or bleeding, were observed.

This new "SMA first" approach is safe and technically feasible for laparoscopic CME with CVL in right hemicolectomy.

The following article summarizes technical aspects of how to operate in the mesentery during complete mesocolic excision (CME). Increasingly, CME is being adopted and as such it is important to establish the anatomical basis of the techniques involved. This review thus serves to provide that foundation and explains the surgical techniques built on it.

Purpose: It is unclear whether the principles of open complete mesocolic excision (CME) can be safely applied to laparoscopic surgery. Furthermore, definitions vary over how radical optimal CME surgery should be. We report morbidity and oncological outcomes for laparoscopic CME without routine gastro-pancreatico-colic trunk (GPCT) dissection. Materials and Methods: An observational study with consecutive data for patients with Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage I-III colon adenocarcinoma who underwent elective laparoscopic resection between 2006 and 2015. Data were retrieved for demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment, and histology from prospectively maintained databases. Standardized, routinely video recorded, laparoscopic resections were performed in two United Kingdom centers from The National Training Programme for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) were reported using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression. Results: Laparoscopic CME was performed in 567 patients, 52.7% (288/546) women, median (interquartile range [IQR]) age 73 (65-80) years. Median (IQR) length of stay was 4 (3-5) days with 4.0 (2.2-5.7)-year follow-up. Significant DFS predictors (hazard ratio [HR]) by multivariable Cox regression were age >80 years (1.9), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 3 and 4 (HR = 1.1), right colon cancer (1.7), UICC stage III (3.4), and intramesocolic grade (2.2). Overall 4-year DFS (95% confidence interval) was 81.3% (77-85). Four-year DFS by UICC grades I, II, and III was 94.6% (89-99), 83.4% (77-88), and 72.2% (66-78), respectively (log-rank P = .001). Morbidity by Clavien-Dindo grade was III 18 (3.2%), IV 4 (0.7%) and V 7 (1.2%). Conclusion: This large series suggests standardized laparoscopic CME without routine GPCT dissection has a low morbidity and achieves equivalent outcomes to the most radical open CME techniques.