This study shows for the first time the presence of intra and extrapancreatic ganglionar neurons and telocytes in Octodon degus such as those described in human and guinea pig pancreas. Pancreatic ganglionar neurons were identified by their histological characteristics as well as their positive immunostaining with mouse anti-human neuron specific enolase (NSE) antibody. Somatostatin secreting delta cells (D cells) in the islets of Langerhans were identified by positive immunostaining with rabbit antihuman polyclonal somatostatin antibody. Electron microscopy evidenced the presence of some unmyelinated axons in the interlobular spaces or septa, usually located adjacent to blood vessels and the exocrine epithelial ducts. The presence of telocytes with at least 2 telopodes was observed in the interlobular space, frequently in close spatial relationship with blood vessels and nerve endings. Telocytes were often observed in the vicinity or even in close proximity with both secretory acini and exocrine epithelial ducts and regulatory nerves and blood vessel apparatuses. A possible framework has been put forward within which such structures might contribute to elicit physiological responses in the pancreas. Further studies of synaptic interactions within and between pancreatic neuron cells are needed to help clarify the morphological results reported here. A broad overview of the field of neurogastroenterology with focus on the pancreas of O. degus related to the enteric nervous system (ENS) is provided in order to help design future studies on the connections of specific neurons forming pancreatic pathways, their neurotransmission processes and how disruption of these pathways may contribute to pancreatic disease.

Nitric oxide (NO), a ubiquitous gaseous signaling molecule, contributes to both pancreatic physiology and pathophysiology.

The present review provides a general overview of NO synthesis, signaling, and function. Further, it specifically discusses NO metabolism and its effects in the exocrine pancreas and focuses on the role of NO in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis and pancreatic ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Unfortunately, the role of NO in pancreatic physiology and pathophysiology remains controversial in numerous areas. Many questions regarding the messenger molecule still remain unanswered.

Probably the least is known about the downstream targets of NO, which need to be identified, especially at the molecular level.

In numerous mammals, nitric oxide (NO) influences the activity of the exocrine and endocrine pancreas. In this study, immunocytochemistry was utilized to investigate the expression of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) in the pancreas of sheep. In double immunocytochemical staining, the co-localization of nNOS with vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP), neuropeptide Y (NPY) or substance P (SP) was studied. The presence of nNOS was confined to the intrapancreatic neurones (9.6 +/- 1.3%) as well as to nerve fibres of the endocrine pancreas and intrapancreatic ganglia. nNOS-immunoreactive (IR) neurones were round and oval in shape and predominantly (83.3 +/- 2.6%) belonged to the middle-size group (25-50 mum). Numerous, fine islets supplying nNOS-IR nerve terminals were devoid of VIP, SP or NPY. Moderately numerous, non-varicose nNOS-IR nerve fibres of intrapancreatic ganglia frequently expressed VIP or NPY, but not SP; 2.2 +/- 0.6% of nNOS-IR intrapancreatic neurones displayed lack of VIP, whereas 7.5 +/- 0.8% were VIP-IR. All nNOS-IR neurones were devoid of SP. The frequencies of nNOS-IR/NPY-IR and nNOS-IR/NPY-negative intrapancreatic neurones were 2.2 +/- 0.4% and 6.1 +/- 1.1%, respectively. Comparison with other mammals indicated that nitrergic innervation of the ovine pancreas is species-determined and may be a reflection of the ruminants' digestion specificity. The possible origin of nNOS-IR nerve fibres and functional significance of NO in the pancreas of sheep were discussed.

The expression of DbetaH and several neuropeptides was investigated in neuronal elements of the ovine pancreas using double immunocytochemical stainings. Immunoreactivities to DbetaH, NPY, VIP and SP were seen to various extents in nerve terminals associated with the acini, islets, ducts, blood vessels, interlobular connective tissue as well as in the neurons of intrapancreatic ganglia. The expression of CGRP was limited to nerve fibers lying in the connective tissue septa, amongst the acini and in close vicinity to the pancreatic blood vessels. Single GRP-positive nerve endings were located around the acini, ducts and in the interlobular connective tissue. With the exception of the ductal system in a co-localization of NPY with DbetaH was frequently found in all regions of the pancreas. Moderately numerous blood vessel-associated VIP-positive nerve fibers as well as the vast majority of VIP-containing intrapancreatic neurons were found to co-express DbetaH. Single SP-immunoreactive (IR) nerve fibers of the exocrine pancreas and interlobular connective tissue as well as SP-positive intrapancreatic neurons additionally showed the presence of DbetaH. The co-localization of VIP and NPY was found in nerve terminals located around the blood vessels and acini, in the connective tissue septa as well as in numerous pancreatic neuronal perikarya. Rare nerve terminals located between the acini and around small blood vessels as well as several neurons of intrapancreatic ganglia were VIP-IR/ SP-IR. Simultaneous expression of SP and CGRP was found in nerve fibers supplying large pancreatic arteries and veins, interlobular connective tissue and, occasionally, around the acini. Throughout the pancreas the population of CGRP-positive nerve endings showed lack of VIP and NPY. In a moderate number of GRP-containing nerve fibers, a co-expression of NPY was noted. Nerve terminals containing both GRP and VIP were detected sporadically, whereas none of the GRP-positive nerve terminals showed expression of SP. We conclude that the presented noradrenergic as well as peptidergic innervation patterns of the ovine pancreas are species-dependent. On the basis of the occurrence of DbetaH, NPY, VIP and SP (alone or in combination) in pancreatic neuronal elements we can suggest that these substances presumably act as regulators of the endocrine and/or exocrine pancreas. Involvement of CGRP and GRP in the ovine pancreas physiology seems to be of minor importance. The co-localization study indicated that the pancreas of the sheep is innervated from several sources including intrinsic as well as extrinsic ganglia.

The parasympathetic (PNS) and sympathetic (SNS) and nervous systems densely innervate the exocrine pancreas. Efferent PNS pathways, consisting of central dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (DMV) and peripheral pancreatic neurons, stimulate exocrine secretion. The DMV integrates cortical (olfactory, gustatory) and gastric, and intestinal vagal afferent input to determine central PNS outflow during cephalic, gastric and intestinal phases of exocrine secretion. Pancreatic neurons integrate DMV input with peripheral enteric, sympathetic, and, possibly, afferent axon reflexes to determine final PNS input to all exocrine effectors. Gut and islet hormones appear to modulate both central and peripheral PNS pathways. Preganglionic sympathetic neurons in the intermediolateral (IML) column of the spinal cord receive inputs from brain centers, some shared with the PNS, and innervate postganglionic neurons, mainly in prevertebral ganglia. Sympathetic innervation of the exocrine pancreas is primarily indirect, and inhibits secretion by decreasing blood flow and inhibiting transmission in pancreatic ganglia. Interactions between SNS and PNS pathways appear to occur in brain, spinal cord, pancreatic and prevertebral ganglia, and at neuroeffector synapses. Thus, the PNS and SNS pathways regulating the exocrine pancreas are directly or indirectly antagonistic at multiple sites: the state of exocrine secretion reflects the balance of these influences. Despite over a century of study, much remains to be understood about the connections of specific neurons forming pancreatic pathways, their processes of neurotransmission, and how disruption of these pathways contributes to pancreatic disease.

Gastrointestinal (GI) smooth muscle responses to stimulation of the nonadrenergic noncholinergic inhibitory nerves have been suggested to be mediated by polypeptides, ATP, or another unidentified neurotransmitter. The discovery of nitric-oxide (NO) synthase inhibitors greatly contributed to our understanding of mechanisms involved in these responses, leading to the novel hypothesis that NO, an inorganic, gaseous molecule, acts as an inhibitory neurotransmitter. The nerves whose transmitter function depends on the NO release are called "nitrergic", and such nerves are recognized to play major roles in the control of smooth muscle tone and motility and of fluid secretion in the GI tract. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor, discovered by Furchgott and Zawadzki, has been identified to be NO that is biosynthesized from l-arginine by the constitutive NO synthase in endothelial cells and neurons. NO as a mediator or transmitter activates soluble guanylyl cyclase and produces cyclic GMP in smooth muscle cells, resulting in relaxation of the vasculature. On the other hand, NO-induced GI smooth muscle relaxation is mediated, not only by cyclic GMP directly or indirectly via hyperpolarization, but also by cyclic GMP-independent mechanisms. Numerous cotransmitters and cross talk of autonomic efferent nerves make the neural control of GI functions complicated. However, the findingsrelated to the nitrergic innervation may provide us a new way of understanding GI tract physiology and pathophysiology and might result in the development of new therapies of GI diseases. This review article covers the discovery of nitrergic nerves, their functional roles, and pathological implications in the GI tract.

Whether nitric oxide is cytodestructive or cytoprotective is of obvious clinical importance. The debate on this subject in the past decade has generated much "heat and light". This paper focuses on the actions of NO on the nervous system and reexamines the controversial issue and the contribution of the authors and their colleagues in the light of recent findings. We also report new findings, critically assesses previous experimental data, and share perspectives on this important subject.

The distribution of nitric oxide synthase in both neuronal and non-neuronal pancreatic tissues and the role of nitric oxide in the control of exocrine pancreatic secretion are reviewed in this article. Earlier reports based on in vivo studies suggested that nitric oxide can affect the secretory activity of the exocrine pancreas through changes in pancreatic blood flow. More recently, the employment of either nitric oxide synthase inhibitors or nitric oxide donors in in vitro preparations has provided evidence that nitric oxide can exert a direct action on this gland independently on its vascular effects. Most research in this area seems to indicate that modulation of exocrine pancreatic function by nitric oxide is exerted via activation of guanylate cyclase and generation of cGMP, although other pathways cannot be excluded. Experiments performed over the last year in our laboratory reveal a novel and interesting mechanism based on the ability of nitric oxide to control the release of endogenous neurotransmitter in the pancreas and, subsequently, the nerve-mediated enzyme secretion.

Acetylcholine (ACh), the major parasympathetic neurotransmitter, is released by intrapancreatic nerve endings during the preabsorptive and absorptive phases of feeding. In beta-cells, ACh binds to muscarinic M(3) receptors and exerts complex effects, which culminate in an increase of glucose (nutrient)-induced insulin secretion. Activation of PLC generates diacylglycerol. Activation of PLA(2) produces arachidonic acid and lysophosphatidylcholine. These phospholipid-derived messengers, particularly diacylglycerol, activate PKC, thereby increasing the efficiency of free cytosolic Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](c)) on exocytosis of insulin granules. IP3, also produced by PLC, causes a rapid elevation of [Ca(2+)](c) by mobilizing Ca(2+) from the endoplasmic reticulum; the resulting fall in Ca(2+) in the organelle produces a small capacitative Ca(2+) entry. ACh also depolarizes the plasma membrane of beta-cells by a Na(+)- dependent mechanism. When the plasma membrane is already depolarized by secretagogues such as glucose, this additional depolarization induces a sustained increase in [Ca(2+)](c). Surprisingly, ACh can also inhibit voltage-dependent Ca(2+) channels and stimulate Ca(2+) efflux when [Ca(2+)](c) is elevated. However, under physiological conditions, the net effect of ACh on [Ca(2+)](c) is always positive. The insulinotropic effect of ACh results from two mechanisms: one involves a rise in [Ca(2+)](c) and the other involves a marked, PKC-mediated increase in the efficiency of Ca(2+) on exocytosis. The paper also discusses the mechanisms explaining the glucose dependence of the effects of ACh on insulin release.

The distribution of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) in neuronal and non-neuronal porcine pancreatic tissues was examined using nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide hydrogen phosphate diaphorase (NADPHd) enzymehistochemistry and neuronal type NOS immunohistochemistry. NOS-containing perikarya were regularly discernible in the pancreatic ganglia, whereas positive thin nerve fibers appeared within nerve bundles of the interlobular spaces and as thin varicose fibers in the vicinity of pancreatic blood vessels. Vascular endothelium showed intense staining for NADPHd and most of the islet cells were NOS immunoreactive. The above morphological findings indicate that nitrergic innervation of the porcine pancreas is very similar to that of the pancreata of other mammalian species and suggest that nitric oxide of both neuronal and extraneuronal origin may regulate blood flow and secretion of the porcine pancreas.

Nitric oxide (NO) may subserve different functions in different central neurons subjected to axotomy. The difference may depend on whether the neurons basally express neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS), a biosynthetic enzyme of NO. This is supported by our previous finding that suggests the differential role of NO in neurons of nucleus dorsalis (ND) and red nucleus (RN) which have different basal expression of nNOS. This study aimed to establish firmly the functions of NO, as revealed by nNOS immunoreactivity and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate diaphorase (NADPH-d) histochemistry, by the administration of endogenous NO donor, l-arginine (l-arg), and NOS inhibitor, l-N(G)-nitroarginine methyl ester (l-NAME). To relate the role of NO to glutamate receptors (GluR), the distributions of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR) and N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) in the two nuclei were revealed by immunohistochemical techniques. nNOS immunoreactivity was void in ND neurons, but expressed weakly in the RN normally. It was induced in ipsilateral ND neurons and upregulated on both sides of RN after spinal cord hemisection. Neuronal loss in the ipsilateral ND was augmented by l-arg, but reduced by l-NAME. In the contralateral RN, l-arg attenuated neuronal loss. NMDAR1 was present in most neurons in ND. After axotomy, some NMDAR1 immunoreactive neurons of the ipsilateral ND were induced to express NOS, whereas RN neurons showed strong staining for NMDAR1 and all the AMPA subunits. Most of the NOS-positive neurons in the RN were coexistent with GluR2 in normal rats and those subjected to axotomy. The present data demonstrated that NO exerted neurodestructive function in the non-NOS-containing ND neurons characterized by NMDAR as the predominant glutamate receptor. NO might be beneficial to the NOS-containing RN neurons. This could be attributed to the presence of GluR2. Possible diverse synthesizing pathways of NO in two different central nuclei were suggested from the observation that NOS was colocalized with NADPH-d in ND neurons, but not in RN neurons.

This paper reviews the work related to nitric oxide (NO) done by the author and his postgraduates and colleagues in the past 7 years in the National University of Singapore. Our work shows that (i) NADPH-d and NO synthase (NOS) are often but not always identical; (ii) NO (as indicated by NADPH-d histochemistry and NOS immunohistochemistry) is generated in some endocrine (thyroid, parathyroid and ultimobranchial glands) and immune (thymus and bursa of Fabricius) organs and the cochlea. It is noted from the above studies that NO could possibly regulate blood flow through the various organs via its presence in the vascular endothelial cells and also via nitrergic neurons innervating the blood vessels. It could also regulate the activity of the secretary cells of these organs by being present in them, as well as acting through nitrergic neurons closely related to them. The paper also examines the Janus-faced nature of NO as a neuroprotective and neurodestructive agent, and the apparent noninvolvement of peroxynitrite and inducible NOS in neuronal death occurring in the red nucleus and nucleus dorsalis after spinal cord hemisection.