Postpolypectomy syndrome (PPS), also known as postpolypectomy coagulation syndrome or transmural burn syndrome, is a rare complication following colonic polypectomy characterized by abdominal pain, fever, and leukocytosis. Herein, we present a case of a patient in his 70s who developed abdominal pain and fever after a polypectomy. He was diagnosed with PPS, which rapidly progressed to septic shock necessitating left hemicolectomy. Pathological findings confirmed intestinal necrosis and severe electrocoagulation injury. Despite surgical intervention, the patient succum to multiple complications. While usually mild, approximately 0.07% of PPS cases require hospitalization due to localized peritonitis from electrocautery. Conservative management is effective, though severe complications are rare. Despite its generally favorable prognosis, our case highlights rapid progression to fatal septic shock postsurgery. Recognition of PPS is crucial, particularly in patients with abdominal pain postpolypectomy, as it can lead to life-threatening outcomes.

Postendoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) is commonly observed after performing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for esophageal neoplasia. However, data on the incidence and risk factors for PEECS in the esophagus are lacking due to an unclear definition of PEECS and varied clinical settings. Therefore, we aimed to determine the risk factors for PEECS in patients undergoing ESD for esophageal neoplasia.

We retrospectively reviewed data of relevant clinical and endoscopy-specific parameters from 202 consecutive patients with esophageal neoplasias (139 carcinomas and 63 dysplasias) who underwent ESD under general anesthesia. Esophageal PEECS was defined by satisfying at least two of the following criteria: fever ≥ 37.8 °C, leukocytosis ≥ 10,800/mm3, and localized chest pain ≥ 5/10 points as assessed on a numeric rating scale within 24 h after ESD. Significant factors associated with PEECS were determined by regression analysis.

PEECS was recorded in 98 of 202 (48.5%) patients. Patients with PEECS exhibited a larger tumor size (25.0 vs. 17.0 mm, P = 0.002), longer procedure (40.0 vs. 29.5 min, P = 0.021) and hemostasis times (5.0 vs. 3.5 min, P = 0.004), required greater submucosal injection volume (60.0 mL vs. 50.0 mL, P = 0.030), and had a lower rate of local steroid injection (4.1% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.029) than those without PEECS. Multivariate regression analysis revealed tumor size ≥ 17 mm (P = 0.047), procedure time ≥ 33 min (P = 0.027), and hemostasis time ≥ 5 min (P = 0.007) as risk factors for PEECS. In addition, local steroid injection was a significant negatively associated factor (P = 0.001).

Patients with a large tumor, prolonged procedure and hemostasis times are at a high risk of PEECS occurrence. Further, local steroid injection is a negatively associated factor.

Postpolypectomy syndrome (PPS) is a relevant adverse event that can appear after polypectomy. Several publications mention postpolypectomy syndrome using different criteria to define it. The aim of this study is to detect potential risk factors and predictors for developing PPS and to define the main criteria of PPS.

In this retrospective monocentric study, 475 out of 966 patients who underwent colonoscopy with polypectomy from October 2015 to June 2020 were included. The main criterion of PPS is defined as the development of postinterventional abdominal pain lasting more than six hours.

A total of 9.7% of the patients developed PPS, which was defined as local abdominal pain around the polypectomy area after six hours. A total of 8.6% of the study population had abdominal pain within six hours postintervention. A total of 3.7% had an isolated triad of fever, leukocytosis, and increased CRP in the absence of abdominal pain. Increased CRP combined with an elevated temperature over 37.5 °C seems to be a positive predictor for developing PPS. Four independent risk factors could be detected: serrated polyp morphology, polypoid configurated adenomas, polyp localization in the cecum, and the absence of intraepithelial neoplasia.

Four independent risk factors for developing PPS were detected. The combination of increased CRP levels with elevated temperature seems to be a predictor for this pathology. As expected, the increasing use of cold snare polypectomies will reduce the incidence of this syndrome. Key summary: Our monocentric study on 966 patients detected four independent risk factors for developing PPS: pedunculated polyp, resected polyps in the cecum, absence of IEN, and serrated polyp morphology. The combination of increased CRP levels with elevated temperature seems to be a predictor for this pathology.

Post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) is a rare complication following endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, many aspects of PEECS are still controversial and there is a lack of up-to-date review. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive review on PEECS.

The English-language literature was searched for articles on PEECS, with a focus on its pathogenesis, definition, and diagnosis, incidence rate, risk factors, prevention, management, and prognosis.

Many aspects of PEECS are still controversial such as etiology, diagnostic criteria, prevention and management. The recent studies tend to agree on the diagnostic criteria for PEECS, defined as localized abdominal tenderness and fever or inflammatory response without delayed perforation. Most patients with PEECS have a favorable prognosis with conservative treatment and more high-quality studies are needed in the controversial aspects mentioned above.

Although cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has spread rapidly, it still remains controversial whether CSP is safe for pedunculated (Ip) polyps.

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether CSP for Ip polyps measuring less than 10 mm in diameter might be associated with an increased rate of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB).

A total of 1641 colorectal polyps in 634 patients were resected at Omori Red Cross Hospital between April 2018 and December 2018. The polyps were divided into two groups depending on the morphology: the Ip group (90 polyps), and the non-Ip group (1551 polyps).

Among the 1641 polyps, there was no case of DPPB, including in the Ip group. Immediate bleeding occurred in a total of 101 (6.2%) cases. Polyp location in the rectum (OR (95% CI), 3.61 (1.843-7.092); p < 0.001), polyp diameter ≥ 6 mm (OR (95% CI), 2.65 (1.702-4.132); p < 0.001), Ip morphology (OR (95% CI), 15.66 (9.262-26.49); p < 0.001), and treatment with antithrombotic agents (OR (95% CI), 2.18 (1.358-3.501); p = 0.0012) were identified as significant risk factors for immediate bleeding.

This is the first study conducted to examine the safety of CSP for Ip polyps measuring less than 10 mm in diameter. CSP can be performed with a high level of safety even for Ip polyps. Based on our findings, we believe that Ip polyps could be included as an indication for CSP. However, prospective, randomized studies are necessary to confirm our results.

The incidence of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome (PECS) can be decreased by closing mucosal defects. However, large mucosal defects after colorectal ESD cannot be closed endoscopically. We established line-assisted complete clip closure (LACC), a novel technique for large mucosal defects after colorectal ESD. We evaluated the prophylactic efficacy of LACC for preventing PECS.

Sixty-one consecutive patients on whom LACC after colorectal ESD was attempted from January 2016 to August 2016 were analyzed. After exclusion of patients with incomplete LACC and adverse events during ESD, 57 patients comprised the LACC group. In contrast, 495 patients who did not undergo closure of a mucosal defect comprised the control group. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for patients' backgrounds. Treatment outcomes were evaluated between the groups.

Median resected specimen size in the LACC-attempted group was 35 mm (range, 20-72 mm), and LACC success rate was 95% (58/61). Median procedure time of LACC was 14 min. In the LACC group, incidence of PECS was only 2%, and no delayed bleeding or perforation occurred. Propensity score matching created 51 matched pairs. Adjusted comparisons between the LACC and control groups showed a lower incidence of PECS (0% vs 12%, respectively; P = 0.03) and shorter hospitalization (5 vs 6 days, respectively; P < 0.001) in the LACC group.

This study suggests that LACC can effectively reduce the incidence of PECS, although further large-scale studies are warranted.

To investigate post endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) of the esophagus.

We analyzed 55 consecutive cases with esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous neoplasms at a tertiary referral hospital in South Korea. Esophageal PEECS was defined as "mild" meeting one of the following criteria without any obvious perforation: fever (≥ 37.8 °C), leukocytosis (> 10800 cells/μL), or regional chest pain more than 5/10 points as rated on a numeric pain intensity scale. The grade of PEECS was determined as "severe" when meet two or more of above criteria.

We included 51 cases without obvious complications in the analysis. The incidence of mild and severe esophageal PEECS was 47.1% and 17.6%, respectively. Risk factor analysis revealed that resected area, procedure time, and muscle layer exposure were significantly associated with PEECS. In multivariate analysis, a resected area larger than 6.0 cm2 (OR = 4.995, 95%CI: 1.110-22.489, P = 0.036) and muscle layer exposure (OR = 5.661, 95%CI: 1.422-22.534, P = 0.014) were independent predictors of esophageal PEECS. All patients with PEECS had favorable outcomes with conservative management approaches, such as intravenous hydration or antibiotics.

Clinicians should consider the possibility of esophageal PEECS when the resected area exceeds 6.0 cm2 or when the muscle layer exposure is noted.

Several reports have described major adverse events after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), such as perforation or bleeding. However, few studies have discussed the occurrence of post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) after colorectal ESD. In addition, the occurrence of fever without abdominal pain in patients requires postoperative management similar to that required for PEECS. Therefore, we have defined post-ESD inflammatory syndrome (PEIS) composed of both PEECS and fever without abdominal pain. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between the findings of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) imaging and PEIS in patients.

Between January 2015 and October 2015, we performed colorectal ESD in 100 patients; after this, all patients underwent abdominal examinations by MDCT scans. Nine patients who experienced intraoperative perforations or penetrations were excluded; 91 patients were enrolled in our prospective study. MDCT findings in patients were classified according to the amount of extraluminal gas. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of extraluminal gas and were assessed for co-occurring PEIS.

Among the 91 patients, extraluminal gas was observed in 31 (34%); of these, PEIS occurred in 14 (15%) patients. Patients with extraluminal gas had increased incidence of PEIS compared with patients without extraluminal gas (29% vs 8%, P = .014).

Extraluminal gas was detected by MDCT in many cases and significantly correlated with the occurrence of PEIS, even in cases without obvious intraoperative perforation or penetration. MDCT findings after ESD may be useful for predicting PEIS and appropriate perioperative management.

Perforation is one of the major complications of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). In the present study, we investigated the clinical outcomes of and management strategies for ESD-related perforations.

Between February 2010 and April 2014, a total of 3821 patients who underwent ESD for an upper gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasm were analyzed using the Yonsei University Severance Hospital database. Clinical outcomes of and management strategies for perforations in 90 patients (2.4 %) were analyzed. The risk factors for the development of perforation were also investigated.

The mean age of our subjects was 64.7 ± 12.2 years (male to female ratio, 3.2:1), and the mean size of the resected specimens was 39.4 ± 12.5 mm. Endoscopically visible perforations (visible perforation group) were noted in 74 of the 90 patients (82.2 %), and clinically suspected perforations (suspected perforation group) were noted in 16 patients (17.8 %). Immediate closure with endoclips was attempted in cases with a visible perforation and was successful in 72 (97.3 %) cases. Two patients in whom endoscopic closure failed underwent surgery. Conservative care, including fasting and intravenous antibiotic administration, was attempted in the suspected perforation group, and all the patients were treated successfully without surgery. The mean durations of fasting, antibiotic treatment, and hospital stay were 3.8 ± 3.1, 6.8 ± 4.2, and 8.7 ± 5.3 days, respectively. Subgroup analysis of perforation type (visible perforation vs. suspected perforation) revealed no significant difference in the clinical course. Tumor location at the upper or middle third of the stomach was significantly associated with perforation.

Most of the ESD-related perforations in upper gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasm could be managed successfully in a non-surgical manner under strict monitoring.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a promising treatment for large gastrointestinal superficial neoplasms, although it is technically difficult, and perforation and delayed bleeding are well-known adverse events. However, there have been no large studies about electrocoagulation syndrome after colorectal ESD. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and clinical significant risk factors of post-ESD coagulation syndrome (PECS).

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a referral cancer center. A total of 336 patients with colorectal neoplasms (143 adenomas or serrated lesions and 193 carcinomas) underwent ESD from January 2011 to June 2013. Incidence, outcome, and factors associated with occurrence of PECS were investigated.

Occurred in 32 patients (9.5%). The median time until PECS was 15.5 h, and the median period of PECS was 32.5 h. Fever (≥37.6 °C) after ESD was found in 41% of the PECS group and 9% of the non-PECS group (P < 0.001). All PECS cases were managed conservatively. On multivariate analysis, female patients (odds ratio [OR] = 3.2, P = 0.002), lesion location at ascending colon and cecum (OR = 3.5, P = 0.001), and resected specimen ≥40 mm (OR = 2.1, P = 0.05) were independent risk factors for PECS.

Occurred in 32 patients (9.5%) with colorectal ESD; however, all cases had a good outcome with conservative management. Female sex, tumor location at the ascending colon and cecum, and resected specimen ≥40 mm were independently significant risk factors for PECS.

Colonoscopy is largely performed in daily clinical practice for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Although infrequent, different complications may occur during the examination, mostly related to the operative procedures. These complications range from asymptomatic and self-limiting to serious, requiring a prompt medical, endoscopic or surgical intervention. In this review, the complications that may occur during colonoscopy are discussed, with a particular focus on prevention, diagnosis, and therapeutic approaches.

The aim of the present study was to develop a rat model of colonic microperforation secondary to thermal injury for future studies to assess new treatments.

Twenty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats were used in this study. Hot biopsy forceps were used for all treatments. All lesions were created in proximal left colon using the soft coagulation setting. The power setting tested was 40 W, and the durations of monopolar soft coagulation application evaluated were 2, 3, and 4 s.

In the acute phase, 48 h after thermal injury, durations of cautery of 2 and 3 s resulted in transmural necrosis, whereas with 4 s microperforation was obtained. In the late phase, 7 d after the damage, only duration of cautery of 4 s showed deep cautery effects, with signs of peritonitis.

We determined optimal power settings and duration of therapy in a rat model for producing electrocautery that involves transmural necrosis with microperforation.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is not a common treatment for colorectal neoplasms because of its technical difficulties and has a higher incidence of complication. In particular, perforation is one of the severe complications and these patients require surgical intervention. However, whether prophylactic closure after colorectal ESD prevents perforation and other complications is not known. In the present study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of prophylactic closure for a large mucosal defect after colorectal ESD using a conventional clip and over-the-scope clip (OTSC) system. From April 2010 to December 2012, 68 patients with colorectal tumors were treated with ESD. The prohylactic closure was indicated for patients with excessive coagulation in the muscularis propria or larger resection size. The closure group reduced the peritoneal inflammatory reaction and abdominal symptoms without increasing complications. The closure group also had a significantly lower WBC count (post operative day 1), CRP (post operative day 4) and abdominal pain after colorectal ESD compared to the non-closure group. Perforation occurred in 1 case, and postoperative bleeding in 2 cases, with only 1 bleeding case needing an emergency endoscopy in the non-closure group. One perforation case needed emergency surgery because the endoscopic treatment was ineffective. Without increasing adverse effects, the prophylactic closure efficiently reduced the inflammatory reaction and abdominal symptoms of colorectal ESD in patients with large superficial colorectal neoplasms.

Although linked with perforation, serositis, delayed bleeding, and incomplete resection, hot biopsy forceps electrocauterization (HBF) is still widely used for diminutive colonic polypectomy.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of HBF in comparison with conventional snare polypectomy (CSP).

Randomized, blinded, controlled trial.

Academic endoscopy unit.

Ten swine.

Eighty-two paired polypectomies (41 HBF, 41 CSP) of small, minimally elevated, artificial lesions. Standardized technique using coagulating current at 25 W. HBF: the tissue was avulsed after 1 to 2 seconds of current caused blanching of the artificial pedicle. CSP: the polyp was removed by snare diathermy.

Histopathology of resected specimens and polypectomy sites in colectomy specimens at necropsy (lateral mucosal and depth of ulceration, necrosis and inflammation).

Some (21%) of the HBF specimens were ablated and uninterpretable. All CSP specimens yielded interpretable specimens. Mucosal necrosis adjacent to HBF resection sites varied widely, between 1.5 and 9 mm (mean 5.7 mm, standard deviation ± 2). There was visible mucosa under the HBF ulcer in 14% of cases. The depth of necrosis in the colon wall was significantly different between the two techniques, with partial muscularis propria (MP) necrosis in 14 of 41 lesions (34%) with HBF, compared with 1 of 41 (2%) of CSP (P < .001), and full-thickness MP necrosis in 9 of 41 lesions (22%) with HBF, compared with 1 of 41 (2%) of CSP (P = .014). There was full-thickness MP inflammation in 13 of 41 lesions (32%) with HBF compared with 5 of 41 (12%) of CSP (P = .06). Transmural subserosal inflammation was seen in 13 of 41 lesions (32%) with HBF compared with 4 of 41 (10%) of CSP (P = .027). There was no relationship between visible lateral mucosal injury and depth of injury (rs = -0.07).

Animal study.

Despite use of the standardized HBF technique, there is a wide range of lateral mucosal and deep thermal injury as well as residual target mucosa. HBF also results in a significantly greater depth of tissue injury, with a high proportion of transmural necrosis. Ensuring minimal blanching of the mucosa during the procedure does not protect from deep injury. In comparison to conventional snare polypectomy, HBF is imprecise, potentially ineffective, and hazardous.

Adequate colonic imaging is generally an invasive procedure with attendant risks, particularly perforation. Endoscopy, barium enema and computed tomographic colonography (CTC) are the main techniques for investigating patients with symptoms of, or screening for, colorectal cancer. The potential complications of these investigations have to be weighed against the benefits. This article reviews the literature on the incidence, presentation and management of iatrogenic colonic perforation at colonic imaging.

A literature review of relevant studies was undertaken using PubMed, Cochrane library and personal archives of references. Manual cross-referencing was performed, and relevant references from selected articles were reviewed. Studies reporting complications of endoscopy, barium enema and CT colonography were included in this review.

Twenty-four studies were identified comprising 640,433 colonoscopies, with iatrogenic perforation recorded in 585 patients (0.06%). The reported perforation rate with double-contrast barium enema was between 0.02 and 0.24%. Serious complications with CTC were infrequent, though nine perforations were reported in a case series of 24,365 patients (0.036%) undergoing CTC.

Perforation remains an infrequent and almost certainly under-reported, complication of all colonic imaging modalities. Risk awareness, early diagnosis and active management of iatrogenic perforation minimizes an adverse outcome.

Our objective was to (1) determine whether more complications are reported by patients 30 days after outpatient colonoscopy than are discussed at our monthly morbidity and mortality conferences, (2) identify complications resulting in visits to the emergency department or physician's office or leading to hospitalization, and (3) assess which factors put patients at highest risk. A secondary goal was to determine the rate of work lost after outpatient colonoscopy.

Trained interviewers performed standardized telephone interviews of consecutive outpatients undergoing colonoscopy at Georgetown University Hospital over a 1-year period.

One thousand one hundred ninety-six patients were contacted 30 days after outpatient colonoscopy and participated in our study. Twenty patients had complications that required a visit to an emergency department or physician. Ninety percent of these cases (18) were detected at 30 days, but 15% (3) were discussed at morbidity and mortality conferences. All seven complications that necessitated hospitalization were identified at 30 days, but only two were discussed at our morbidity and mortality conference. The most common complications reported by patients were abdominal discomfort (5.4%) and rectal bleeding (2.1%).

More complications are detected by means of contacting patients 30 days after outpatient colonoscopy than are discussed at our morbidity and mortality conferences.

We investigated the effect of antibiotics for the prevention of infectious complications subsequent to endscopic treatment of the colon and rectum. Thirty-three patients who underwent endoscopic polypectomies and/or hot-biopsies were divided into two groups: (A, n = 17) with and (B, n = 16) without prophylactic administration of antibiotics. The oral lavage solution method with isotonic magnesium citrate was used for bowel preparation. For group A, 250 mg of kanamycin was administered orally four times, at 30-min intervals, after the oral lavage solution of isotonic magnesium citrate was administered, and 3.2 g of clavulanic acid-ticarcillin was administered by drip infusion after the endoscopic treatment. Latent inflammatory reactions were assessed based on blood cell analysis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum C-reactive protein, and serum phospholipase A2 activity before and the day after the endoscopic treatment. Postoperative platelet, white blood cell, and neutrophil counts were significantly increased in group B, while increases in these parameters were all suppressed in group A. These results suggested that bacterial infections developed subsequent to endoscopic surgery on the colon and rectum. Although we do not need to administer antibiotics to all patients, in patients at high risk of infection, such as those with leukemia or diabetes mellitus, endoscopic polypectomy or hot-biopsy of the colon and rectum should be performed with the administration of antibiotics.

Unsuspected problems are commonly encountered during colonoscopic polypectomy. This paper identifies the most frequent difficulties and describes solutions to them. One of the most important pitfalls is overlooking a lesion or tumour in the colon; this can only be solved by better training, experience and care, although it may happen in the best of hands with the most knowledgeable colonoscopist. Other pitfalls addressed include the stuck snare, use of a gastroscope for the difficult sigmoid polyp, and methods to aid discovery and retrieval of the polypectomy specimen.

Virtually all colonic polyps may be removed endoscopically and with great safety provided the endoscopist is experienced with diagnostic colonoscopy as well as electrosurgical principles and hazards. Many polypoid protrusions will not require total removal or even sampling. Those lesions thought to need formal surgical management will require not only adequate tissue sampling but also accurate localization for the surgeon.

The diagnostic and therapeutic contribution of fiberoptic endoscopy to the advancement of the knowledge of gastrointestinal disease and to its proper management is already established. Technical refinements in the new instruments and extensive acceptance of the advantages of the method makes fiberendoscopy a procedure widely used throughout the world. Therefore, the appreciation of its potential risk of complications and hazards is justified. This review summarizes the complications and hazards of fiberoptic gastrointestinal endoscopy gleaned from reports of endoscopic surveys and individual experiences. Causes and means whereby complications related to upper intestinal and colonic endoscopy can be prevented or treated are discussed.