Acute severe ulcerative colitis (UC) (ASUC) requiring hospitalization affects up to 1 in 4 patients with UC. There is a paucity of prospective and multicenter clinical cohorts to study treatment trends and predictors of disease outcomes. Here, we conduct a US-based multicenter prospective clinical cohort of ASUC to study predictors of the need for medical rescue therapy and colectomy.

A total of 94 patients hospitalized for ASUC were included across 5 academic centers from December 2018 to December 2021. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected throughout the hospitalization. Patients were followed up to 1-year post-hospitalization to identify predictors of the need for rescue therapy and colectomy.

A total of 21 (22.3%) patients required colectomy within 1 year of admission with 11 (12%) requiring colectomy during the index admission. On multivariate analyses, a BMI < 21.5 kg/m2 (OR = 6.16, P = .02), a simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCAI) greater than 8 (OR = 14.44, P = .01) and an albumin level at admission lower than 2.4 g/dL (OR = 10.61, P = .04) were significant predictors of inpatient colectomy after adjusting for sex, age, and duration of disease.

In a prospective, multicenter cohort of patients hospitalized with ASUC, BMI, SCCAI, and albumin at admission were important determinants of colectomy risk during the index hospitalization and within 1 year of admission. Colectomy rates remain high-22.3% in this cohort across 5 academic, tertiary care centers-underscoring the need to identify the highest-risk patients, establish novel treatment and care paradigms, and examine opportunities to standardize care.

Up to 30% of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) will require urgent colectomy despite initiation of intravenous corticosteroids and rescue therapies. Janus kinase inhibitors, such as tofacitinib, have emerged as an effective agent for ASUC; however, there are currently limited data evaluating the risk of postoperative complications among patients who received tofacitinib treatment for an episode of ASUC compared with infliximab.

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, case-control study of patients hospitalized with ASUC who underwent colectomy, comparing patients treated with tofacitinib prior to colectomy with infliximab-treated controls. The primary outcome was rate of serious postoperative complications within 30 days of colectomy. Outcomes were compared between the tofacitinib-treated cases and infliximab-treated controls using multivariable regression adjusted for open surgery and cumulative corticosteroid exposure.

Forty-one tofacitinib-treated patients were compared with 68 infliximab-treated patients with ASUC. Compared with tofacitinib-treated patients, infliximab-treated patients had higher overall rates of overall (44 [64.7%] vs 13 [31.7%]; P = .002) and serious (19 [27.9%] vs 3 [12%]; P = .019) postoperative complications. No significant different risk for developing serious postoperative complications (odds ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.96; P = .061) was observed in multivariable analysis; however, a significantly lower rate of overall postoperative complications (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.87; P = .023) was observed in tofacitinib-treated patients compared with infliximab-treated patients.

We observed a significantly lower rate of overall postoperative complications in ASUC patients treated with tofacitinib compared with infliximab; however, no difference was observed in the risk for serious postoperative complications. Larger prospective trials are needed to confirm these findings.

One-third of patients presenting with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) are steroid-refractory and require either colectomy or rescue therapy. Timely identification of risk factors predictive of steroid non-response in ASUC patients is crucial for initiating early rescue therapy.

To identify factors predicting steroid failure or colectomy in ASUC.

Records of ASUC admissions over a six-year period in a tertiary inflammatory bowel disease center were included. Clinical variables, laboratory markers, and endoscopic scores at admission were obtained. The primary outcome was non-response to intravenous (IV) steroids. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with steroid non-response. Day-one and day-three composite indices were calculated. Their predictive value was assessed against the outcomes of steroid failure and requiring colectomy.

One hundred and three ASUC patients were included, of which 51 were steroid non-responders. Among non-responders, 48 received rescue therapy, and 6 underwent colectomy at index admission (3 after rescue therapy and 3 without). Day-one albumin (OR 0.906, P = 0.043) and being on oral steroids at entry (OR 3.009, P = 0.014) predicted non-response to steroids in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Admission hemoglobin level predicted steroid non-response only in univariate (OR 0.982, P = 0.047). Although an old score, Travis criteria predicted both steroid non-response (OR 8.4, P = 0.001) and requiring colectomy (OR 22.19, P = 0.006).

Lower albumin levels and being on oral steroids at admission for ASUC can predict IV steroid failure, and we suggest the possibility of early initiation of advanced therapy in this subgroup.

Despite the availability of several biologics for ulcerative colitis (UC), there remains a critical need to identify first-line treatment biologics. The superiority of infliximab (IFX) over vedolizumab (VED) and ustekinumab (UST) was evaluated as initial UC treatments in patients with biologic-naïve UC.

This multicenter, randomized control trial was conducted across 20 Japanese medical institutions. An independent center randomly allocated patients with UC (Mayo score ≥ 6) who had not previously used biologics to three treatment groups (IFX, VED, UST). The primary endpoint was the clinical remission (CR) rate at week 12, with other endpoints including the treatment continuation rate at week 26 and adverse events (AEs).

From May 2021 to June 2023, 107 cases were registered, including 104 for safety and 97 for efficacy evaluation. CR rate at week 12 was 36.4% (95%CI:20.4-54.9), 32.4% (95%CI:17.4-50.5) and 43.3% (95%CI:25.5-62.6) in IFX, VED, and UST group, respectively. Continuation rates at week 26 were 50.0%(IFX), 58.3% (VED), and 82.4% (UST). AEs related to study medication were 14.7% (IFX), 16.7% (VED), and 5.9% (UST). Predictors for CR at week 12 were thiopurine use in IFX (p = 0.04), lower baseline Mayo score (p = 0.007), and lower Patient report outcome 2 (p = 0.003) at week 2 in VED.

Due to small sample size, it is challenging to make conclusions for main endpoints from this study while our study suggested that use of thiopurines in IFX group and lower activity at enrollment in VED group may enhance treatment efficacy. (jRCT1031200329; available at https://jrct.niph.go.jp/ ).

Approximately one in every four patients with ulcerative colitis will develop acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). Historically, this was managed with intravenous steroids and surgery when steroids failed. The use of rescue therapy.

This review summarizes the latest research in the management of hospitalized patients with ASUC. Covering the historical data and success of rescue therapy with cyclosporine and then with infliximab changed outcomes and reduced the risk of colectomy during the hospitalization and at 1 year. More recently, more biologics and small molecules have been approved and more patients present to the hospital with ASUC already failing anti-tumor necrosis factor antagonists. More recent studies have shown some efficacy of rescue therapy with other classes of biologics (e.g. interleukins and anti-integrins). The more recently approved small molecules (i.e. tofacitinib and Upadacitinib) have shown a rapid onset in therapeutic efficacy in as little as 1 day with sustained response at 1 year in reducing the risk of colectomy following ASUC.

In the expert opinion, we discuss the challenges in the treatment of patients with ASUC. We summarize the data of current biologics and new small molecules and their emerging roles in the management of ASUC.

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a life-threatening medical emergency affecting over 20% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Up to 40% of patients are refractory to intravenous corticosteroids (IVCS) and require rescue medical therapy or immediate colectomy. The potent Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, upadacitinib and tofacitinib, have proven efficacy in a randomised control trial setting for moderate-to-severe UC, but not ASUC. We describe a case series of sequential rescue therapy with JAK inhibitors following the failure of dose-intensified infliximab in corticosteroid-refractory ASUC. Six adult (>16 years old) patients received sequential rescue therapy with a JAK inhibitor (upadacitinib n = 5, tofacitinib n = 1) following failure of IVCS and dose-intensified infliximab at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (QLD, Australia) between October 2023 and April 2024. All patients met the Truelove and Witts criteria for ASUC on admission. Data were captured during admission and at 90-days post-discharge. Co-primary outcomes were 90-day colectomy-free survival and inpatient clinical response (<4 non-bloody stools per day) 72 h after JAK-inhibitor initiation. Secondary outcomes included 90-day clinical (PRO-2 score < 1) and biochemical (faecal calprotectin (FCP) < 150 µg/g and C-reactive protein (CRP) < 5 mg/L) corticosteroid-free remission and adverse events. Median CRP on admission was 100 mg/L (interquartile range (IQR) 58-105), median FCP 3400 µg/g (IQR 910-4950) and median Mayo Endoscopic Score 3. Four out of six patients had a clinical response within 72 h of sequential JAK-inhibitor rescue therapy. Two patients underwent emergent inpatient colectomy for refractory disease - one of whom developed post-operative sepsis. Among the four JAK-responders at 90 days, all achieved corticosteroid-free clinical remission and three achieved biochemical remission. No other adverse events were recorded. There is a promising role for JAK inhibitors as sequential rescue therapy following the failure of dose-intensified infliximab in select patients with corticosteroid-refractory ASUC.

Patients hospitalized with moderately severe or acute severe ulcerative colitis (UC) may experience metabolic disturbances, including alterations in insulin resistance due to inflammation and the administration of glucocorticoids (GCs). This pilot study aimed to evaluate insulin sensitivity in patients hospitalized for moderately severe to severe UC.

Patients hospitalized for moderately-severely active UC at Örebro University Hospital, Sweden, were eligible for inclusion. Quantification of insulin sensitivity was performed using the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (HEC) methodology. Assessment of insulin sensitivity was performed during both the index flare and while patients were in steroid-free clinical, biochemical and endoscopic remission during follow-up. Additionally, healthy controls were evaluated using HEC for comparison.

Five patients with moderately-severely active UC, treated with intravenous GCs for ≥2 days, were included and underwent HEC assessment. During the index flare, four patients received second-line treatment with infliximab due to non-response to GC, and one patient was subsequently referred for acute subtotal colectomy. At inclusion, all five patients exhibited significantly reduced insulin sensitivity, and levels appeared similar regardless of the outcome of the index flare. At remission during follow-up, the insulin sensitivity was restored to levels comparable to healthy controls (n = 5).

The study demonstrates that patients with moderately severe to severe UC experience significant insulin resistance, irrespective of the outcome of the flare. The reduced insulin sensitivity is likely driven by a combination of active inflammation and GC treatment, as insulin sensitivity returned to normal levels when patients achieved remission during follow-up.

Refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains challenging despite the availability of various biologics. Advanced combination therapy (ACT) with biologics and Upadacitinib (UPA), a rapid-onset oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor, has shown promise in managing refractory IBD. However, its use in Asia has not been explored. This study aims to fill that gap by providing data from Taiwan.

This retrospective study included refractory IBD patients who received ACT with biologics and UPA, followed up at the Chang Gung Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center from July 2020 to August 2024. Patients were assessed for clinical response and remission at weeks 4, 12, and 24. Safety profiles were monitored throughout the follow-up period to evaluate the risk of adverse events.

Sixteen refractory IBD patients were enrolled. The median disease duration was 4.5 years [IQR 2.25-9.50]. The most common regimen was Ustekinumab plus UPA (63%). Clinical response rates at weeks 4, 12, and 24 were 88%, 83%, and 100%, respectively, while remission rates were 31%, 50%, and 80%. One patient (6.25%) experienced a minor adverse event (acne), with no major events like herpes zoster reactivation or major cardiac complications.

This is the first study in Asia to demonstrate that UPA-based ACT is both effective and safe in treating refractory IBD. However, the limitations of this retrospective, single-center study with a relatively small sample size highlight the need for future larger-scale, multi-center prospective studies to confirm these findings, identify predictors of treatment response, and evaluate long-term outcomes.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory bowel disease in which one-quarter of patients are at risk of developing a severe form of the disease known as acute severe UC (ASUC). This condition exposes patients to serious complications, including toxic megacolon, surgical intervention, and even death. The current therapeutic strategy relies on time-dependent, multi-step algorithms that integrate systemic corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and biologic agents (specifically infliximab) as medical therapy aimed at avoiding colectomy. Despite this approach, a significant proportion of patients fail to respond to either corticosteroids or infliximab and may require alternative therapeutic options if there is no urgent surgical necessity. These alternatives include other biologics or emerging small molecules, although the evidence supporting these treatments remains extremely low, even considering their well-documented and promising efficacy and safety in moderate-to-severe UC. Conversely, it is necessary to investigate whether infliximab can be effectively replaced or surpassed by other approved biological agents and small molecules as first-line therapy after steroid resistance. This review aims to summarise the available evidence on small molecules, specifically Janus kinase inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators.

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) affects up to 25% of patients with UC and is associated with an increased risk of colectomy. Despite improvements in medical management, individual patient prognostication and risk stratification in ASUC remains challenging. We explored clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic factors as potential predictors for colectomy in patients hospitalized with ASUC.

A retrospective analysis of patients with ASUC as defined by Truelove and Witts criteria admitted to the Mount Sinai Hospital between 2011 and 2020 was conducted. Data on disease history, medication use, clinical symptoms, and laboratory results during admission for ASUC were included. Colectomy risk during hospitalization and within one year was assessed.

We included 158 patients; 34 (21.5%) underwent colectomy during hospital admission and 41 (25.9%) within a year. On multivariable analysis, prior anti-TNF exposure (odds ratio [OR] 4.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.57-13.4, P = 0.005), and biologic use at admission (OR 3.31, 95%CI 1.14-9.63, P = 0.028) were associated with an increased risk of 1-year colectomy. Conversely, mesalamine use at admission decreased this risk (OR 0.31, 95%CI 0.13-0.72, P = 0.006). Other risk factors included recent UC-related hospitalization (< 1 year of admission), higher bowel movement frequency after 3 days of treatment, low hemoglobin and albumin levels, and elevated CRP. Infliximab treatment was associated with decreased risk of urgent (OR 0.30, 95%CI 0.13-0.73, P = 0.007) and 1-year colectomy (OR 0.31, 95%CI 0.14-0.73, P = 0.007).

In patients with ASUC, prior anti-TNF exposure is linked to a higher risk of both short- and long-term colectomy, while recycling infliximab may reduce colectomy risk.

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory condition of the colon driven by aberrant immune activation. Although advanced medical therapies form the cornerstone of ulcerative colitis management, unmet needs include failure to induce and sustain remission in a substantial proportion of patients and in managing acute severe ulcerative colitis. We review new treatment strategies that might improve patient outcomes in the management of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.

A literature search was conducted using the PubMed database, including studies published from inception to October 2024, selected for their relevance. Recognizing current limitations, this article reviews strategies to improve treatment outcomes in ulcerative colitis using advanced therapies. These approaches include early treatment initiation, dose optimization, positioning newer agents as first-line therapies, combination therapy, targeting novel therapeutic endpoints, and the management of acute severe ulcerative colitis.

The strategies discussed may contribute to establishing new standards of care aimed at achieving long-term remission and enhancing patient outcomes. Personalized therapy, which tailors treatment based on individual disease characteristics and risk factors, is anticipated to become a critical aspect of delivering more effective care in the future.

Tofacitinib is a rapidly acting Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor with increasing evidence of effectiveness in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). However, there are scarce prospective data analyzing the efficacy and rapidity of action in hospitalized ASUC.

The TRIUMPH study is a prospective open-label interventional trial of tofacitinib in hospitalized patients with ASUC conducted in 5 hospitals across Canada (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04925973). Eligible participants included biologic-naïve and experienced patients with ASUC refractory to 3 days of intravenous (IV) corticosteroids (Modified Truelove-Witts Severity Index [MTWSI] > 10 despite steroids). Participants were treated with tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily and assessed daily while in hospital. The primary outcome was day 7 clinical response (MTWSI reduction of > 3 from baseline and ≤ 10).

Among 24 subjects, 33.3% (8/24) had previous anti-TNF failure. Day 7 clinical response was achieved in 58.3% (14/24). The mean number of days to achieve clinical response was 2.4 (SD 1.3). Marked reduction in C-reactive protein was observed in responders within the first two days after tofacitinib initiation compared to nonresponders. Colectomy occurred in 25% (6/24) by 6 months, with no additional colectomy beyond this time point. Five participants reported a total of 13 adverse events.

Tofacitinib is an effective rescue therapy in hospitalized patients with steroid-refractory ASUC. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to compare JAK inhibitors with other rescue therapies, including infliximab in steroid-refractory ASUC (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04925973).

The role of various histologic scores in predicting outcomes in acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is unexplored.

Consecutive patients of ASUC undergoing sigmoidoscopy and histological assessment by two independent pathologists for Simplified Geboes score (SGS), Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI) and Nancy histological index (NHI)] were included. Primary outcome was the role of histology in predicting need for second-line therapy or colectomy.

Of 82 patients with ASUC (mean age: 36 years, males 47.5 %), non-response to steroids was observed in 27 (32.9 %) of cases. Sixteen patients required second-line drug therapy and 8 required colectomy. There was no significant association between the need for second-line therapy or colectomy and the baseline histological scores [NHI (p = 0.61), SGS (p = 0.116) and RHI (p = 0.109)]. All three scores performed poorly to predict the need for second-line treatment or colectomy within 28 days. There was no significant association between histological scores and steroid response (NHI (p = 0.796), SGS (p = 0.57) and RHI (p = 0.941)]. All three scores had a strong positive correlation observed between each other but not with endoscopic Mayo score.

The three histologic scores (SGS, RHI and NHI) performed poorly in prediction of need for second-line treatment or colectomy in ASUC. Future studies should study the impact of histologic assessment on long term outcomes in ASUC.

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a critical manifestation of ulcerative colitis (UC), often necessitating colectomy when medical management fails. Despite advancements in therapeutic interventions such as corticosteroids, biologics, and JAK inhibitors, a significant proportion of patients require surgery, with colectomy rates ranging from 10% to 15%.

This paper reviews the factors influencing the timing and necessity of colectomy in ASUC management, emphasizing the importance of multidisciplinary decision-making involving gastroenterologists and surgeons.

Key surgical indications include failure of medical therapy, toxic megacolon, perforation, uncontrolled bleeding, and systemic deterioration. Delays in surgery can result in higher morbidity and mortality rates, making timely intervention essential. This review highlights surgical techniques, including total colectomy and end ileostomy, and discusses potential complications, urging a balanced approach to optimize patient outcomes.

While corticosteroids have led to significant reduction in ASUC mortality over the last few decades, they are associated with significant side effects and up to 30% of patients have steroid refractory ASUC, which means we require safer and better therapies for patients with ASUC. Several salvage therapies have been proposed in guidelines; however, we lack high quality head-to-head randomised controlled trials to assess effectiveness and safety of these agents. Furthermore, the role of newer novel agents in ASUC management is unclear. We aim to present an up to date review and envisage future treatment of ASUC without steroids based on current trials and data. In summary, we conclude that ASUC treatment still heavily relies on corticosteroids despite the side effect profile. While infliximab and cyclosporine have extensive data, there are no prospective studies comparing them with corticosteroids as initial therapy. Novel therapies open up the possibility of oral options but require prospective data before any conclusion can be made.

Interventional clinical trials in acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) are characterized by substantial heterogeneity due to a lack of consensus in several key areas of trial design-this impedes clinical research efforts to identify novel therapies. The objective of this initiative was to achieve the first consensus and provide clear position statements on ASUC trial design.

A modified Delphi consensus approach was employed with a panel of 20 clinicians with international representation and expertise in ASUC trial design and delivery. Agreement was defined as at least 75% of participants voting as "agree" with each statement.

In total, 30 statements achieved consensus and were approved. Statements centred on proposing suitable eligibility criteria (disease extent, disease severity, prior therapy exposure), optimizing trial design (randomization, stratification, corticosteroid handling, timing of assessments), and recommending primary and secondary endpoints alongside defining key efficacy outcomes (clinical and endoscopic response and remission, treatment failure, quality of life).

The expansion of drugs to treat moderate-severe ulcerative colitis over the past decade, particularly the rapidly acting Janus kinase inhibitors, is promising and has reignited the interest in identifying suitable therapeutic candidates for ASUC. Clinical trials in this high-risk population are challenging to conduct and this consensus provides a framework for future trials to advance drug development.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by growing incidence and prevalence around the world in the last few decades. The range of available existing treatment and strategies for its management is being implemented. Given the introduction of newly developed molecules and the lack of specific guidelines, drug positioning may represent a tough clinical challenge. UC management is mostly medical, and it has been shifting toward a more personalized approach with the aim to create a tailored strategy depending on the patient's profile. A treat-to target strategy seems to be the best approach to reach disease control as it allows to carry out therapeutic choices based on objective and specific parameters: histological, ultrasonographic, and molecular targets may add to the already used clinical, endoscopic, and biochemical targets. In addition, dual-targeted therapy has emerged as an attractive therapeutic strategy for patients not achieving remission. This review aims to provide an overview of the available strategies to raise the bar in UC.

Mucosal deficiency is one of the most challenging conditions in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). Intravenous corticosteroids (CS) are the first-line treatment, with infliximab (IFX) used as a rescue therapy. However, the efficacy remains unsatisfactory. We investigated whether CS combined with IFX as first-line therapy would improve outcomes in patients with ASUC with mucosal deficiency.

A retrospective study was performed at a tertiary inflammatory bowel disease center. The primary outcomes included clinical remission, endoscopic improvement, and endoscopic remission at week 14. The secondary outcomes included the colectomy rate within 90 days and durable clinical remission.

A total of 43 patients with ASUC with mucosal deficiency were included in the analysis (25 in the CS combined with the IFX group and 18 in the CS sequential IFX group). At week 14, endoscopic improvement was observed in 21 of 25 patients (84.0%) receiving the CS combined with the IFX regimen, compared to 9 of 18 (50.0%) patients receiving the CS sequential IFX regimen (p = 0.017). Durable clinical remission rates were significantly higher in the combined group than in the sequential group (85.7% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.004). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of clinical and endoscopic remission at week 14 or colectomy rate within 90 days. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the CS combined with the IFX regimen was an independent predictive factor for a higher endoscopic improvement rate at week 14 (odds ratio (OR) 8.428, 95%confidence interval (CI) 1.539-46.153, p = 0.014) and a higher durable clinical remission rate (OR 10.800, 95%CI 2.095-55.666, p = 0.004).

CS combined with IFX as first-line therapy may be an effective induction strategy in patients with ASUC with mucosal deficiency. Further large-scale, multicenter prospective studies are needed.

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) poses challenges to patient management owing to its high surgical rate. This study aimed to identify predictors of colectomy in patients with ASUC.

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PubMed and Web of Science were searched up to April 2024.

Studies on the predictors of colectomy in adult patients with ASUC were eligible.

Two reviewers independently extracted the data using a prespecified data collection sheet. A qualitative synthesis was performed in tabular form. Random-effect meta-analyses were conducted using OR and 95% CI.

Forty-two studies were included in the systematic review. The reported variables can be categorised into biomarkers, auxiliary examination findings, demographic and clinical characteristics, and drug factors. Through meta-analysis, albumin (OR 0.39 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.59) per 1 g/dL increment, I2=0.0%), high C reactive protein level (2.63 (1.53 to 4.52), I2=29.6%), high erythrocyte sedimentation rate level (2.92 (1.39 to 6.14), I2=0.0%), low haemoglobin level (2.08 (1.07 to 4.07), I2=56.4%), fulfilling the Oxford criteria (4.42 (2.85 to 6.84), I2=0.0%), extensive colitis (1.85 (1.24 to 2.78), I2=47.5%), previous steroids (1.75 (1.23 to 2.50), I2=17.7%) or azathioprine (2.25 (1.28 to 3.96), I2=0.0%) use, and sarcopenia (1.90 (1.04 to 3.45), I2=0.0%) were identified as valuable predictors for colectomy within 1 year. The ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity (OR 2.41 (95% CI 1.72 to 3.39), I2=1.5%) was the only predictor found to predict colectomy over 1 year.

Identification of these predictors may facilitate risk stratification of patients with ASUC, drive personalised treatment and reduce the need for colectomy.

Overall, 30-40% patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis [ASUC] fail intravenous [IV] steroids, requiring medical rescue therapy/colectomy. Low baseline albumin predicts steroid non-response, and exclusive enteral nutrition [EEN] has been shown to improve steroid response and albumin levels. Albumin infusion, due to its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, might further improve steroid response in ASUC, which was evaluated in the present study.

In this open-label, randomised, controlled trial, patients with ASUC were randomised in 1:1 ratio to either albumin + standard of care [SOC] + EEN [Albumin arm] or SOC + EEN [SOC arm], over January 2021-February 2023. Both arms received 5 days of EEN with 400 mg IV hydrocortisone/day. Patients in the Albumin arm were administered 5 days of 20% weight/volume [w/v] intravenous albumin [100 ml]. Primary outcome was first, steroid failure [need for rescue medical therapy or colectomy] and second, proportion of patients with adverse events.

In all, 61 patients [albumin: 30, SOC: 31][mean age 31.6 ± 0.4 years, male 57.4%], were included. Baseline characteristics were comparable. There was no difference in steroid failure between Albumin and SOC arms (10/30 [33.33%] vs 13/31[41.94%], p = 0.49). No adverse events were reported with albumin infusions. Colectomy rate [10% vs 9.68%, p = 1], response to salvage medical therapy [88.89% vs 76.92%, p = 0.62] and median [interquartile range] duration of hospitalisation [10.5 [7-16] vs 10 [7-20], p = 0.43] were also comparable. The long-term composite outcome of colectomy and re-admission rates was numerically higher in the Albumin than the SOC arm [37.04% vs 17.86%, p > 0.05], although this did not reach statistical significance.

There was no benefit of intravenous albumin infusion as an adjunct to IV steroids and EEN in patients with ASUC.

Severe colitis is a well-defined condition encompassing several etiologies but is most often caused by severe ulcerative colitis or Clostridioides difficile infection. Severe colitis can evolve into toxic colitis, or toxic megacolon when associated with bowel dilation and systemic manifestations, resulting in a life-threatening scenario where multidisciplinary management is often required. Medical management continues to play an important role in the initial treatment of toxic megacolon. However, timely surgical intervention can be lifesaving.

The optimal dosing strategy for infliximab in steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is unknown. We compared intensified and standard dose infliximab rescue strategies and explored maintenance therapies following infliximab induction in ASUC.

In this open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial, patients aged 18 years or older from 13 Australian tertiary hospitals with intravenous steroid-refractory ASUC were randomly assigned (1:2) to receive a first dose of 10 mg/kg infliximab or 5 mg/kg infliximab (randomisation 1). Block randomisation was used and stratified by history of thiopurine exposure and study site, with allocation concealment maintained via computer-generated randomisation. Patients in the 10 mg/kg group (intensified induction strategy [IIS]) received a second dose at day 7 or earlier at the time of non-response; all patients in the 5 mg/kg group were re-randomised between day 3 and day 7 (1:1; randomisation 2) to a standard induction strategy (SIS) or accelerated induction strategy (AIS), resulting in three induction groups. Patients in the SIS group received 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6, with an extra 5 mg/kg dose between day 3 and day 7 if no response. Patients in the AIS group received 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 1, and 3, with the week 1 dose increased to 10 mg/kg and given between day 3 and day 7 if no response. The primary outcome was clinical response by day 7 (reduction in Lichtiger score to <10 with a decrease of ≥3 points from baseline, improvement in rectal bleeding, and decreased stool frequency to ≤4 per day). Secondary endpoints assessed outcomes to day 7 and exploratory outcomes compared induction regimens until month 3. From month 3, maintenance therapy was selected based on treatment experience, with use of thiopurine monotherapy, combination infliximab and thiopurine, or infliximab monotherapy, with follow-up as a cohort study up to month 12. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02770040, and is completed.

Between July 20, 2016, and Sept 24, 2021, 138 patients were randomly assigned (63 [46%] female and 75 [54%] male); 46 received a first dose of 10 mg/kg infliximab and 92 received 5 mg/kg infliximab. After randomisation 1, we observed no significant difference in the proportion of patients who had a clinical response by day 7 between the 10 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg groups (30 [65%] of 46 vs 56 [61%] of 92, p=0·62; risk ratio adjusted for thiopurine treatment history, 1·06 [95% CI 0·94-1·20], p=0·32). We found no significant differences in secondary endpoints including time to clinical response or change in Lichtiger score from baseline to day 7. Two patients who received 10 mg/kg infliximab underwent colectomy in the first 7 days compared with no patients in the 5 mg/kg group (p=0·21). Three serious adverse events occurred in three patients in both the 10 mg/kg group and 5 mg/kg group. After randomisation 2, the proportions of patients with clinical response at day 14 (34 [74%] of 46 in the IIS group, 35 [73%] of 48 in the AIS group, and 30 [68%] of 44 in the SIS group, p=0·81), clinical remission at month 3 (23 [50%], 25 [52%], 21 [48%], p=0·92), steroid-free remission at month 3 (19 [41%], 20 [42%], 18 [41%], p=1·0), endoscopic remission at month 3 (21 [46%], 22 [46%], 21 [48%], p=0·98), and colectomy at month 3 (three [7%] of 45, nine [19%] of 47, five [12%] of 43, p=0·20) were not significantly different between groups. Between day 8 and month 3, the proportion of patients with at least one infectious adverse event possibly related to infliximab was two (4%) of 46 in the IIS group, eight (17%) of 48 in the AIS group, and eight (18%) of 44 in the SIS group (p=0·082). No deaths occurred in the study.

Infliximab is a safe and effective rescue therapy in ASUC. In steroid-refractory ASUC, a first dose of 10 mg/kg infliximab was not superior to 5 mg/kg infliximab in achieving clinical response by day 7. Intensified, accelerated, and standard induction regimens did not result in a significant difference in clinical response by day 14 or in remission or colectomy rates by month 3.

Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, Gastroenterology Society of Australia, Gandel Philanthropy, Australian Postgraduate Award, Janssen-Cilag.

In children, ulcerative colitis (UC) is often more severe and extensive than in adults and hospitalization for acute exacerbations occurs in around a quarter of subjects. There is a need for effective drugs, which could avoid or reduce the use of corticosteroids which, especially in children, are burdened by a number of severe side effects. The introduction in therapy of monoclonal antibodies has completely changed the therapeutic scenario and the prognosis of the disease.

In this review, the use of the monoclonal antibodies directed against tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α or other inflammatory targets for the treatment of pediatric UC will be discussed. A search of the literature was done using the keywords 'pediatric,' 'ulcerative colitis,' 'inflammatory bowel disease,' 'monoclonal antibodies;' 'infliximab,' 'adalimumab,' 'golimumab,' vedolizumab," 'ustekinumab' and 'risankizumab.'

The use of monoclonal antibodies has greatly increased in recent years in pediatric UC, both in patients who did not respond to conventional therapies, and, more often, as initial therapy. Thanks to therapeutic drug monitoring and to the availability of biologics with different targets, therapy has become more targeted and personalized, with a significant improvement in response, in quality of life, and with a good safety profile.

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a potentially life-threatening complication of ulcerative colitis (UC) that can lead to significant morbidity and mortality, with a substantial number of patients needing colectomy. Infliximab (IFX) has been increasingly used as a rescue therapy for patients who have failed intravenous steroids and has been more frequently used as an induction and maintenance therapy in moderate-to-severe UC. Therefore, the number of patients admitted with ASUC previously exposed to IFX has been increasing, raising additional challenges in the medical management of these patients to avoid emergent colectomy. This narrative review intends to summarise the most recent evidence in the medical management of steroid-refractory ASUC patients previously exposed to IFX and to propose a treatment algorithm for approaching this difficult-to-treat group of patients.

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency that affects approximately 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis at some point in time in their lives. Outcomes of ASUC are highly variable. Approximately 30% of patients do not respond to corticosteroids and up to 50% of patients do not respond to rescue therapy (infliximab or cyclosporin) and require emergency colectomy. Data are emerging on infliximab dosing strategies, use of cyclosporin as a bridge to slower acting biologic agents and Janus kinase inhibition as primary and sequential therapy. In this review, we outline contemporary approaches to clinical management of ASUC in the setting of failure to respond to traditional rescue therapies.

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a potentially life-threatening medical emergency that occurs in up to 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis. Although intravenous corticosteroids remain the cornerstone of therapy, 30-40% of patients will not respond and need timely consideration of rescue therapy with (currently) either infliximab or ciclosporin or indeed colectomy, underscoring the importance of multidisciplinary care to ensure favourable outcomes for patients. We discuss the current evidence and present an approach to the management of ASUC for general and specialist clinicians caring for patients with ASUC.

The information in this review is derived from data published in peer- reviewed academic journals and registered clinical trials.

Management of acute severe colitis requires a multidisciplinary approach with early initiation with steroids and timely escalation of treatment to either medical rescue therapy or surgery.

Balancing the risks of delayed surgery vs. optimizing medical therapy, including accelerated dosing schedules for biologics, remains ambiguous.

The position on newer molecules like Janus Kinase inhibitors, such as tofacitinib, is a growing area with early real-world data showing promise for steroid refractory ASUC.

Developing predictive biomarkers and clinical risk scores for personalized rescue therapy selection is an evolving area of research.

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), characterised by bloody diarrhoea and systemic inflammation, is associated with a significant risk of colectomy and a small risk of mortality. The landmark trial of cortisone in 1955 was pivotal for two reasons: first, for establishing the efficacy of a drug that remains a first-line therapy today and, second, for producing the first set of disease severity criteria and clinical trial endpoints that shaped the subsequent ASUC trial landscape. Trials in the 1990s and at the turn of the millennium established the efficacy of infliximab and ciclosporin, but since then, there has been little progress in drug development for this high-risk population. This systematic review evaluates all interventional randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in patients hospitalised with severe UC. It provides an overview of the efficacy of treatments from past to present and assesses the evolution of trial characteristics with respect to study populations, eligibility criteria and study designs over time. This review details ongoing RCTs in this field and provides a perspective on the challenges for future clinical trial programmes and how these can be overcome to help deliver novel ASUC therapies.

Inflammatory bowel disease increases the risk of colorectal neoplasia. A particular problem arises in patients who have undergone subtotal colectomy leaving a rectal remnant. The risk of future rectal cancer must be accurately estimated and weighed against the risks of further surgery or surveillance. The aim of this study was to estimate the 10-year cumulative incidence of rectal cancer in such patients.

A nationwide study using England's hospital administrative data was performed. A cohort of patients undergoing subtotal colectomy between April 2002 and March 2014 was identified. A competing risks survival analysis was performed to calculate the cumulative incidence of rectal cancer. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on endoscopic surveillance was investigated using time-trend analysis.

A total of 8120 patients were included and 61 patients (0.8%) were diagnosed with cancer. The cumulative incidence of rectal cancer was 0.26% (95% c.i. 0.17% to 0.39%), 0.49% (95% c.i. 0.36% to 0.68%), and 0.77% (95% c.i. 0.57% to 1.02%) at 5, 10, and 15 years respectively. A previous diagnosis of colonic dysplasia (HR 3.34, 95% c.i. 1.01 to 10.97; P = 0.047), primary sclerosing cholangitis (HR 5.42, 95% c.i. 1.34 to 21.85; P = 0.018), and elective colectomy (HR 1.83, 95% c.i. 1.11 to 3.02; P = 0.018) was associated with an increased incidence of rectal cancer. Regarding endoscopic surveillance, there was a 43% decline in endoscopic procedures performed in 2020 (333 procedures) compared with 2019 (585 procedures).

The incidence of rectal cancer after subtotal colectomy is low. Asymptomatic patients without evidence of rectal dysplasia should be carefully counselled on the possible benefits and risks of prophylactic proctectomy.

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency for which colectomy is required in patients who do not respond to rescue therapy. While previous studies have predominantly focused on predicting outcome to first-line corticosteroid therapy, there is a need to understand the factors associated with response to rescue therapies in order to improve clinical outcomes. We reviewed the evidence regarding factors associated with response to rescue therapy in adults with ASUC and identified future directions for research.

A systematic search of the literature was conducted, and 2 reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion.

Of 3509 records screened, 101 completed studies were eligible for inclusion. We identified 42 clinical, hematological, biochemical, endoscopic, or pharmacological factors associated with response to rescue therapy. Older age (≥50 years), thiopurine experience, and cytomegalovirus or Clostridioides difficile infection were associated with a higher risk of nonresponse to rescue therapy. Biochemical factors associated with poorer response included an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥30mg/L on admission, hypoalbuminemia and an elevated ratio of CRP to albumin. Severe endoscopic findings, including a Mayo endoscopic score of 3 or Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity ≥5, portended poorer outcomes. The role of fecal calprotectin and therapeutic value of measuring infliximab drug levels in ASUC remain to be defined.

Response to rescue therapy can be predicted by several specific factors, which would aid clinical decision-making. Existing and emerging factors should be integrated within predictive and prognostic models to help improve clinical outcomes.

Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis (ASUC) is a severe form of ulcerative colitis relapse which requires hospitalization and intensive medical intervention to avoid colectomy. The timely recognition of patients at risk of corticosteroid failure and the early initiation of medical rescue therapy are paramount in the management of ASUC. The choice of medical rescue therapy is influenced by multiple factors, especially patient's prior treatment history. This decision should involve the patient and ideally a multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals, including gastroenterologists, radiologists, surgeons and enterostomal therapists. Although several predictive models have been developed to predict corticosteroid failure in ASUC, there is no single validated tool that is universally utilized. At present, infliximab and cyclosporine are the only agents systematically evaluated and recommended for medical rescue therapy, with recent reports of off-label utilization of tofacitinib and upadacitinib in small case series. The available evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of these oral small molecules for ASUC is insufficient to provide definitive recommendations. Early decision-making to assess the response to medical rescue therapy is essential, and the decision to pursue surgery in the case of treatment failure should not be delayed.

Background: The Mayo Score [MS], endoscopic Mayo Score [eMS] and the Ulcerative Colitis Index of Severity [UCEIS] are employed in the assessment of ulcerative colitis [UC] severity. This study compared the aforementioned indices in terms of predictory value for response to remission induction treatment with anti-TNF and anti-integrin biologics. Methods: A total of 38 patients were retrospectively evaluated in the study, 23 male and 15 female, aged 18-74 years old who had undergone a total of 53 biological therapy courses with either infliximab [IFX] or vedolizumab [VDZ] at the Department of Gastroenterology of the Medical University of Łódź. The clinical and endoscopic activity of UC was assessed at the outset of biological therapy and the 14th week remission induction assessment juncture. Results: The study analyzed 19 IFX and 34 VDZ treatment courses. The response rate of patients receiving IFX reached 73.67% and the response rate was 58.82% for VDZ. The mean MS, eMS and UCEIS improved among all patient groups: 8.316 ± 1.974 to 4.158 ± 2.218 (p < 0.05), 2.632 ± 0.597 to 1.790 ± 0.713 (p < 0.05) and 4.790 ± 1.745 to 3.000 ± 1.453 (p < 0.05) for IFX, 7.088 ± 2.234 to 3.618 ± 2.412 (p < 0.05), 2.706 ± 0.524 to 1.677 ± 1.065 (p < 0.05) and 4.235 ± 1.350 to 2.735 ± 1.880 (p < 0.05) for VDZ. Conclusions: The outcome assessment in induction treatment of UC includes clinical data and endoscopic evaluation. Severity of inflammatory lesion activity according to the eMS and UCEIS indices correlates with the overall disease presentation as evaluated with MS. The UCEIS provides an overall better predictor for biological induction treatment when compared with the eMS in both patient groups, particularly in those receiving VDZ. It provides a promising alternative to the eMS and can be employed for both initial disease severity assessment as well as for treatment response monitoring.

Tofacitinib is indicated in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC); however, given its rapid onset of action, it may constitute an alternative in patients with hospitalized severe acute UC. There are few data on this indication in the literature. The aim of this study was to describe the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in the management of patients with hospitalized UC, as well as its clinical characteristics and other treatment patterns.

Descriptive observational study of adults and children with CUAG treated with tofacitinib between June 2019 and December 2022 in Colombia. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were collected, therapeutic response was evaluated in different periods of time and descriptive analysis of quantitative and qualitative variables was performed.

Six patients (five adults and one pediatric), mean age 33.2 (SD: 8.5) years, with CUAG. Symptom remission was obtained in 100% of patients at day 7 after tofacitinib initiation. In three patients information was obtained beyond 6 months, with 100% clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic remission and without requiring colectomy. In the case of the pediatric patient, symptom remission was achieved one week after starting tofacitinib, remaining in clinical, biochemical and endoscopic remission beyond 6 months. No serious adverse events were reported in any of the cases.

Tofacitinib represents a rescue therapeutic alternative in CUAG, with rapid clinical response, adequate tolerance and less need for colectomy, being sustained for periods beyond 6 months.

Treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) has been revolutionized by the arrival of biotherapies and technical progress in interventional endoscopy and surgery. (Sub)total emergency colectomy is required in the event of complicated severe acute colitis: colectasis, perforation, hemorrhage, organ failure. Corticosteroid therapy is the reference treatment for uncomplicated severe acute colitis, while infliximab and ciclosporin are 2nd-line treatments. At each step, before and after each line of treatment failure, surgery should be considered as an option. In cases refractory to medical treatment, the choice between surgery and change in medication must weigh the chronic symptoms associated with the disease against the risks of postoperative complications and functional sequelae inherent to surgery. Detection of dysplastic lesions necessitates chromoendoscopic imaging with multiple biopsies and anatomopathological verification. Endoscopic treatment of these lesions remains reserved for selected patients. These different indications call for multidisciplinary medical-surgical discussion. Total coloproctectomy with ileo-anal anastomosis (TCP-IAA) is the standard surgery, and it holds out hope for healing. Modalities depend on patient characteristics, previous emergency colectomy, and presence of dysplasia. It may be carried out in one, in two modified, or in three phases. The main complications are anastomotic fistula, short-term pouch-related fistula, ileo-anal pouch syndrome, pouchitis and long-term digestive and sexual disorders. For selected cases, an alternative can consist in total colectomy with ileo-rectal anastomosis or permanent terminal ileostomy. The objective of this update is to clarify the indications, modalities, and results of surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis in accordance with the most recent data in the literature.

The influence of concomitant prednisolone on clinical outcomes and safety in infliximab-treated ulcerative colitis (UC) patients is unknown.

A retrospective cohort study was performed, including 147 UC patients treated with infliximab at a tertiary inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) centre. Primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CFCR) at week 14 and week 52. Patients were grouped according to prednisolone tapering regimens: standard (≤5 mg/week), fast (>5 mg/week), direct discontinuation or no prednisolone. Patients intolerant to corticosteroids and patients stopping corticosteroids in preparation for surgery including colectomy during their initial admission were excluded.

There was no overall association between prednisolone exposure or no exposure and CFCR at weeks 14 or 52 of infliximab. The proportion of patients with C reactive protein ≤5 mg/L was higher in the standard tapering at week 14 as compared with faster regimens or no prednisolone. In subgroup analyses, the standard tapering was associated with a higher rate of CFCR at week 14 compared with the fast-tapering regimen in patients receiving ≥40 mg prednisolone at initiation of infliximab (64.3% vs 26.3%, p=0.04) and among patients admitted with acute severe UC (66.6% vs 23.5%, p<0.05). Similar data were seen at week 52. Prednisolone did not affect infliximab trough levels but increased infection rates (10/77 vs 2/70, p=0.03), in particular C. difficile infection.

In UC patients with limited disease burden, prednisolone did not affect effectiveness of infliximab. However, patients with increased disease burden seem to benefit from corticosteroid combination therapy.

Colectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC) is common despite therapeutic advances. Post-operative morbidity and mortality demonstrate an association between hospital volumes and outcomes. This single-centre retrospective study examines outcomes after emergency colectomy for UC.

Patient demographics, perioperative variables and outcomes were collected in Beaumont Hospital between 2010 and 2023. Univariant analysis was used to assess relationships between perioperative variables and morbidity and length of stay (LOS).

A total of 115 patients underwent total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy for UC, 8.7 (±3.8) per annum. Indications were refractory acute severe colitis (88.7%), toxic megacolon (6.1%), perforation (4.3%), or obstruction (0.9%). Over 80% of cases were performed laparoscopically. Pre-operative steroid (93%) and biologic (77.4%) use was common. Median post-operative LOS was 8 days (interquartile range 6-12). There were no 30-day mortalities, and 30-day post-operative morbidity was 38.3%. There was no association between time to colectomy ( P  = 0.85) or biologic use ( P  = 0.24) and morbidity. Increasing age was associated with prolonged LOS ( P  = 0.01). Laparoscopic approach (7 vs. 12 days P  =0.01, 36.8% vs. 45% P  = 0.66) was associated with reduced LOS and morbidity.

This study highlights contemporary outcomes after emergency colectomy for UC at a specialist high-volume, tertiary referral centre, and superior outcomes after laparoscopic surgery in the biologic era.

Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) supplementation of the standard of care (SOC) augments steroid responsiveness in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). EEN is known to alter gut microbial composition. The present study investigates EEN-driven gut microbial alterations in patients with ASUC and examines their correlations with clinical parameters.

Stool samples from patients with ASUC (n = 44) who received either EEN-supplemented SOC (EEN group; n = 20) or SOC alone (SOC group; n = 24) for 7 days were collected at baseline (day 0) and postintervention (day 7). Microbiome analysis was carried out using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing followed by data processing using QIIME2 and R packages.

Seven-day EEN-conjugated corticosteroid therapy in patients with ASUC enhanced the abundances of beneficial bacterial genera Faecalibacterium and Veillonella and reduced the abundance of Sphingomonas (generalized linear model fitted with Lasso regularization with robustness of 100%), while no such improvements in gut microbiota were observed in the SOC group. The EEN-associated taxa correlated with the patient's clinical parameters (serum albumin and C-reactive protein levels). Unlike the SOC group, which retained its preintervention core microbiota, EEN contributed Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a beneficial gut bacterial taxon, to the gut microbial core. EEN responders showed enhancement of Ligilactobacillus and Veillonella and reduction in Prevotella and Granulicatella. Analysis of baseline gut microbiota showed relative enhancement of certain microbial genera being associated with corticosteroid response and baseline clinical parameters and that this signature could conceivably be used as a predictive tool.

Augmentation of clinical response by EEN-conjugated corticosteroid therapy is accompanied by beneficial gut microbial changes in patients with ASUC.