Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive and lethal forms of cancer, characterized by a highly desmoplastic tumor microenvironment. One main risk factor is chronic pancreatitis (CP). Progression of CP to PDAC is greatly influenced by persistent inflammation promoting genomic instability, acinar-ductal metaplasia, and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) formation. Components of the extracellular matrix, including immune cells, can modulate this progression phase. This includes cells of the innate immune system, such as natural killer (NK) cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, mast cells, neutrophils, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), either promoting or inhibiting tumor growth. On one hand, innate immune cells can trigger inflammatory responses that support tumor progression by releasing cytokines and growth factors, fostering tumor cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. On the other hand, they can also activate immune surveillance mechanisms, which can limit tumor development. For example, NK cells are cytotoxic innate lymphoid cells that are able to kill tumor cells, and active dendritic cells are crucial for a functioning anti-tumor immune response. In contrast, mast cells and MDSCs rather support a pro-tumorigenic tumor microenvironment that is additionally sustained by platelets. Once thought to play a role in hemostasis only, platelets are now recognized as key players in inflammation and cancer progression. By releasing cytokines, growth factors, and pro-angiogenic mediators, platelets help shape an immunosuppressive microenvironment that promotes fibrotic remodeling, tumor initiation, progression, metastasis, and immune evasion. Neutrophils and macrophages exist in different functional subtypes that can both act pro- and anti-tumorigenic. Understanding the complex interactions between innate immune cells, platelets, and early precursor lesions, as well as PDAC cells, is crucial for developing new therapeutic approaches that can harness the immune and potentially also the coagulation system to target and eliminate tumors, offering hope for improved patient outcomes.

Cyclic nucleotides are synthesized by adenylyl and/or guanylyl cyclase, and downstream of this synthesis, the cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase families (PDEs) specifically hydrolyze cyclic nucleotides. PDEs control cyclic adenosine-3',5'monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine-3',5'-monophosphate (cGMP) intracellular levels by mediating their quick return to the basal steady state levels. This often takes place in subcellular nanodomains. Thus, PDEs govern short-term protein phosphorylation, long-term protein expression, and even epigenetic mechanisms by modulating cyclic nucleotide levels. Consequently, their involvement in both health and disease is extensively investigated. PDE inhibition has emerged as a promising clinical intervention method, with ongoing developments aiming to enhance its efficacy and applicability. In this comprehensive review, we extensively look into the intricate landscape of PDEs biochemistry, exploring their diverse roles in various tissues. Furthermore, we outline the underlying mechanisms of PDEs in different pathophysiological conditions. Additionally, we review the application of PDE inhibition in related diseases, shedding light on current advancements and future prospects for clinical intervention. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Regulating PDEs is a critical checkpoint for numerous (patho)physiological conditions. However, despite the development of several PDE inhibitors aimed at controlling overactivated PDEs, their applicability in clinical settings poses challenges. In this context, our focus is on pharmacodynamics and the structure activity of PDEs, aiming to illustrate how selectivity and efficacy can be optimized. Additionally, this review points to current preclinical and clinical evidence that depicts various optimization efforts and indications.

G-quadruplex (G4) structures are non-canonical nucleic acid conformations that play crucial roles in gene regulation, DNA replication, and telomere maintenance. Recent studies have highlighted G4 ligands as promising anticancer agents due to their ability to modulate oncogene expression and induce DNA damage. By stabilizing G4 structures, these ligands affect tumor progression. Additionally, they have been implicated in tumor immunity modulation, particularly through the activation and immunogenic cell death induction of the cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)-stimulator of interferon genes (STING) signaling pathway. Moreover, their disruption of telomere maintenance and regulation of key oncogenes, such as c-MYC and KRAS, position them as candidates for immune-based therapeutic interventions. Despite their therapeutic potential, challenges remain in optimizing their clinical applications, particularly in patient stratification and elucidating their immunomodulatory effects. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms through which G4 ligands influence tumor progression and immune regulation, highlighting their potential role in future cancer immunotherapy strategies.

In recent years, precision medicine for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has made significant strides, particularly with advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies. Targeted 7therapies and Anti-PD-(L)1 Therapies have emerged as vital treatment options, yet KRAS mutations, especially KRAS G12C, have been historically difficult to address. Due to the unique activation mechanism of KRAS G12C has led to the development of specific inhibitors, such as AMG 510 and MRTX849, which show promising therapeutic potential. However, results from the CodeBreaK 200 Phase III trial indicated that AMG 510 did not significantly improve overall survival compared to docetaxel. Resistance after prolonged use of KRAS G12C inhibitors continues to pose a challenge, prompting interest in new drugs and combination strategies. KRAS mutations can impair tumor-infiltrating T cell function and create an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, making the combination of KRAS G12C inhibitors with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies particularly appealing. Preliminary data suggest these combinations may enhance both survival and quality of life, though safety concerns remain a barrier. Ongoing research is crucial to refine treatment regimens and identify suitable patient populations. This review focuses on the development of KRAS G12C inhibitors in monotherapy and combination therapies for NSCLC, discussing major clinical trials and future research directions.

Various bioactive materials, including peptides, have become potential candidates for slowing cancer growth and metastasis. Among bioactive peptides, a synthetic cell-penetrating peptide referred to as rat sarcoma (RAS)-binding peptide (RBP) was suggested as a potential entity that targets RAS with high affinity in MDA-MB-231 cancer cells. This RAS binding further inhibits the RAS-rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (RAF) protein-protein interaction. The current study revealed that RBP effectively suppresses proliferation and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) phosphorylation by disrupting the RAS-RAF interaction. This intervention not only inhibits cell migration and invasion but also has substantial potential for preventing metastasis. The RAS-RAF-ERK1/2 pathway is a key target for anticancer drug development because of frequent ERK and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in human cancers. MDA-MB-231, a triple-negative breast cancer cell line, harbors a G13D Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog mutation, making it resistant to many drugs. In addition to its in vitro antitumor activity, RBP was identified as a potent antagonist that substantially arrests tumor growth and invasiveness in in vivo chicken egg and mouse xenograft tumor models. Notably, histopathological analyses revealed increased immune cell infiltration and decreased Ki-67 expression, confirming the ability of RBP to inhibit tumor cell proliferation. Taken together, these findings highlight RBP as a therapeutic anticancer biomaterial capable of impeding the progression and metastasis of RAS-mutated cancers.

This review addresses oxidative stress and redox signaling in the pancreas under healthy physiological conditions as well as in acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, and diabetes. Physiological redox homeodynamics is maintained mainly by NRF2/KEAP1, NF-κB, protein tyrosine phosphatases, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator 1α (PGC1α), and normal autophagy. Depletion of reduced glutathione (GSH) in the pancreas is a hallmark of acute pancreatitis and is initially accompanied by disulfide stress, which is characterized by protein cysteinylation without increased glutathione oxidation. A cross talk between oxidative stress, MAPKs, and NF-κB amplifies the inflammatory cascade, with PP2A and PGC1α as key redox regulatory nodes. In acute pancreatitis, nitration of cystathionine-β synthase causes blockade of the transsulfuration pathway leading to increased homocysteine levels, whereas p53 triggers necroptosis in the pancreas through downregulation of sulfiredoxin, PGC1α, and peroxiredoxin 3. Chronic pancreatitis exhibits oxidative distress mediated by NADPH oxidase 1 and/or CYP2E1, which promotes cell death, fibrosis, and inflammation. Oxidative stress cooperates with mutant KRAS to initiate and promote pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Mutant KRAS increases mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS), which trigger acinar-to-ductal metaplasia and progression to pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN). ROS are maintained at a sufficient level to promote cell proliferation, while avoiding cell death or senescence through formation of NADPH and GSH and activation of NRF2, HIF-1/2α, and CREB. Redox signaling also plays a fundamental role in differentiation, proliferation, and insulin secretion of β-cells. However, ROS overproduction promotes β-cell dysfunction and apoptosis in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Clinically approved treatments for advanced liver cancer often lack potency because of the heterogeneous characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This complexity is largely driven by context-dependent inflammatory responses brought on by diverse etiologies, such as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), the genetic makeup of cancer cells, and the versatile adaptability of immune cells, such as myeloid cells. In this review, we discuss the evolutionary dynamics of the immune landscape, particularly that of liver-resident Kupffer cells (KCs), TREM2+, and SPP1+ macrophages with an active role during liver disease progression, which eventually fuels hepatocarcinogenesis. We highlight exploitable immunomodulatory avenues amenable to mitigate both the inherent pathological characteristics of liver cancers and the associated external factors that favor malignancy, paving a roadmap toward improving the management and therapeutic outcome for patients with HCC.

Pancreatic cancer is among the most challenging tumors to treat, and due to its immune tolerance characteristics, existing immunotherapy methods are not effective in alleviating the disease. Oncolytic virus therapy, a potential new strategy for treating pancreatic cancer, also faces the limitation of being ineffective when used alone. Elucidating the key host endogenous circular RNAs (circRNAs) involved in M1 virus-mediated killing of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cells may help overcome this limitation. Here, we report that the oncolytic virus M1, a nonpathogenic alphavirus, exhibits different cell viability-inhibitory effects on different pancreatic cancer cells in the clinical stage. Through high-throughput circRNA sequencing, we found that circRNA expression varies among these cells. Further gain-of-function and loss-of-function experiments have shown that circ-1584 can selectively enhance the anti-pancreatic cancer effects of the M1 virus in vitro and in vivo. Additionally, circ-1584 may negatively regulate miR-578 to modulate the anti-pancreatic cancer effects of the M1 virus. Our findings lay the foundation for using circRNA as an adjuvant to enhance the M1 virus efficacy against pancreatic cancer.

Inflammation, a hallmark of cancer, has been associated with tumor progression, transition into malignant phenotype and efficacy of anticancer treatments in cancer. It affects all stages of cancer, from the initiation of carcinogenesis to metastasis. Chronic inflammation induces immunosup-pression, providing an environment conducive to carcinogenesis, whereas acute inflammation induces an antitumor immune response, leading to tumor suppression. Solid tumors have an inflammatory tumor microenvironment (TME) containing cancer cells, immune cells, stromal cells, and soluble molecules, which plays a key role in tumor progression and therapy response. Both cancer cells and stromal cells in the TME are highly plastic and constantly change their phenotypic and functional properties. Cancer-associated inflammation, the majority of which consists of innate immune cells, plays an important role in cancer cell plasticity, cancer progression and the development of anticancer drug resistance. Today, with the combined used of advanced technologies, such as single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial molecular imaging analysis, the pathways linking chronic inflammation to cancer have been largely elucidated. In this review article, we highlighted the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in cancer-associated inflammation and its effects on cancer progression and treatment response. We also comprehensively review the mechanisms linking chronic inflammation to cancer in the setting of GI cancers.

Neutrophils are traditionally viewed as uncomplicated exterminators that arrive quickly at sites of infection, kill pathogens, and then expire. However, recent studies employing modern transcriptomics coupled with novel imaging modalities have discovered that neutrophils exhibit significant heterogeneity within organs and have complex functional roles ranging from tissue homeostasis to cancer and chronic pathologies. This has revised the view that neutrophils are simplistic butchers, and there has been a resurgent interest in neutrophils. The spleen was described as a granulopoietic organ more than 4 decades ago, and studies indicate that neutrophils are briefly retained in the spleen before returning to circulation after proliferation. Transcriptomic studies have discovered that splenic neutrophils are heterogeneous and distinct compared with those in blood. This suggests that a unique hematopoietic niche exists in the splenic microenvironment, i.e., capable of programming neutrophils in the spleen. During severe systemic inflammation with an increased need of neutrophils, the spleen can adapt by producing neutrophils through emergency granulopoiesis. In this review, we describe the structure and microanatomy of the spleen and examine how cells within the splenic microenvironment help to regulate splenic granulopoiesis. A focus is placed on exploring the increase in splenic granulopoiesis to meet host needs during infection and inflammation. Emerging technologies such as single-cell RNA sequencing, which provide valuable insight into splenic neutrophil development and heterogeneity, are also discussed. Finally, we examine how tumors subvert this natural pathway in the spleen to generate granulocytic suppressor cells to promote tumor growth.

The Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) mutation is one of the most prevailing mutations in various tumors and is difficult to cure. Long-term proliferation in carcinogenesis is primarily initiated by oncogenic KRAS-downstream signaling. Recent research suggests that it also activates the autocrine effect and interplays the tumor microenvironment (TME). Here, we discuss the emerging research, including KRAS mutations to immune evasion in TME, which induce immunological modulation that promotes tumor development. This review gives an overview of the existing knowledge of the underlying connection between KRAS mutations and tumor immune modulation. It also addresses the mechanisms to reduce the effect of oncogenes on the immune system and recent advances in clinical trials for immunotherapy in KRAS-mutated cancers.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) immune cell therapies have revolutionized oncology, particularly in hematological malignancies, yet their efficacy against solid tumors remains limited due to challenges such as dense stromal barriers and immunosuppressive microenvironments. With advancements in nanobiotechnology, researchers have developed various strategies and methods to enhance the CAR cell efficacy in solid tumor treatment. In this Review, we first outline the structure and mechanism of CAR-T (T, T cell), CAR-NK (NK, natural killer), and CAR-M (M, macrophage) cell therapies and deeply analyze the potential of these cells in the treatment of solid tumors and the challenges they face. Next, we explore how biomaterials can optimize these treatments by improving the tumor microenvironment, controlling CAR cell release, promoting cell infiltration, and enhancing efficacy. Finally, we summarize the current challenges and potential solutions, emphasize the effective combination of biomaterials and CAR cell therapy, and look forward to its future clinical application and treatment strategies. This Review provides important theoretical perspectives and practical guidance for the future development of more effective solid tumor treatment strategies.

The three RAS genes (HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS) comprise the most frequently mutated oncogene family in cancer. KRAS is the predominant isoform mutated in cancer and is most prevalently mutated in major causes of cancer deaths including lung, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers. Despite extensive academic and industry efforts to target KRAS, it would take nearly four decades before approval of the first clinically effective KRAS inhibitors for the treatment of KRAS mutant lung cancer. We revisit past anti-KRAS strategies and painful lessons learned and then focus on the rapidly evolving landscape of direct RAS inhibitors, resistance mechanisms, and potential combination treatments.

Tumorigenesis embodies the formation of a heterotypic tumour microenvironment (TME) that, among its many functions, enables the evasion of T cell-mediated immune responses. Remarkably, most TME cell types, including cancer cells, fibroblasts, myeloid cells, vascular endothelial cells and pericytes, can be stimulated to deploy immunoregulatory programmes. These programmes involve regulatory inducers (signals-in) and functional effectors (signals-out) that impair CD8+ and CD4+ T cell activity through cytokines, growth factors, immune checkpoints and metabolites. Some signals target specific cell types, whereas others, such as transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), exert broad, pleiotropic effects; as signals-in, they trigger immunosuppressive programmes in most TME cell types, and as signals-out, they directly inhibit T cells and also modulate other cells to reinforce immunosuppression. This functional diversity and redundancy pose a challenge for therapeutic targeting of the immune-evasive TME. Fundamentally, the commonality of regulatory programmes aimed at abrogating T cell activity, along with paracrine signalling between cells of the TME, suggests that many normal cell types are hard-wired with latent functions that can be triggered to prevent inappropriate immune attack. This intrinsic capability is evidently co-opted throughout the TME, enabling tumours to evade immune destruction.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) exhibits a complex microenvironment with diverse cell populations influencing patient prognosis. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) was used to identify prognosis-related cell types, and DNA methylation (DNAm)-based models were developed to predict outcomes based on their cellular characteristics.

We integrated scRNA-seq, bulk data, and clinical information to identify key cell populations associated with prognosis. The TCGA dataset was used for validation, and cell composition was inferred from DNAm data. Prognostic models were constructed based on cell-type-specific DNAm markers, and genomic features were compared across risk groups. Nomograms were created to assess treatment responses in different risk levels.

Epithelial and T cells were major prognostic factors. Genomic analysis showed that epithelial cells in PDAC followed a malignant trajectory. DNAm data from TCGA confirmed the association of higher epithelial and T cell proportions with worse prognosis. Prognostic models based on DNAm markers of these cells effectively predicted patient survival, especially 5-year overall survival (AUC = 0.834). High-risk group with epithelial cell model showed altered pathways (tight junctions, NOTCH, and P53 signaling), while high-risk group with T cell model had changes in glycolysis, hypoxia, and NOTCH signaling, with more KRAS or TP53 mutations. Low-risk groups in the T cell model displayed stronger antitumor immune responses. Treatment predictions and nomograms were developed for clinical use.

scRNA-seq and DNAm data integration enabled the creation of predictive models based on epithelial and T cell-specific methylation patterns, offering robust prognosis prediction for PDAC patients.

Bone metastasis (BM) is a common complication of cancer and contributes to a higher mortality rate in patients with cancer. The treatment of BM remains a significant challenge for oncologists worldwide. The colony‑stimulating factor (CSF) has an important effect on the metastasis of multiple cancers. In vitro studies have shown that CSF acts as a cytokine, promoting the colony formation of hematopoietic cells by activating granulocytes and macrophages. Other studies have shown that CSF not only promotes cancer aggressiveness but also correlates with the development and prognosis of various types of cancer. In recent years, the effect of CSF on BM has been primarily investigated using cellular and animal models, with limited clinical studies available. The present review discussed the composition and function of CSF, as well as its role in the progression of BM across various types of cancer. The mechanisms by which osteoclast‑ and osteoblast‑mediated BM occur are comprehensively described. In addition, the mechanisms of action of emerging therapeutic agents are explored for their potential clinical applications. However, further clinical studies are required to validate these findings.

KRAS inhibitors demonstrate clinical efficacy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC); however, resistance is common. Among patients with KRASG12C-mutant PDAC treated with adagrasib or sotorasib, mutations in PIK3CA and KRAS, and amplifications of KRASG12C, MYC, MET, EGFR, and CDK6 emerged at acquired resistance. In PDAC cell lines and organoid models treated with the KRASG12D inhibitor MRTX1133, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling associate with resistance to therapy. MRTX1133 treatment of the KrasLSL-G12D/+; Trp53LSL-R172H/+; p48-Cre (KPC) mouse model yielded deep tumor regressions, but drug resistance ultimately emerged, accompanied by amplifications of Kras, Yap1, Myc, Cdk6, and Abcb1a/b, and co-evolution of drug-resistant transcriptional programs. Moreover, in KPC and PDX models, mesenchymal and basal-like cell states displayed increased response to KRAS inhibition compared to the classical state. Combination treatment with KRASG12D inhibition and chemotherapy significantly improved tumor control in PDAC mouse models. Collectively, these data elucidate co-evolving resistance mechanisms to KRAS inhibition and support multiple combination therapy strategies. Significance: Acquired resistance may limit the impact of KRAS inhibition in patients with PDAC. Using clinical samples and multiple preclinical models, we define heterogeneous genetic and non-genetic mechanisms of resistance to KRAS inhibition that may guide combination therapy approaches to improve the efficacy and durability of these promising therapies for patients. See related commentary by Marasco and Misale, p. 2018.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a digestive system malignancy characterized by challenging early detection, limited treatment alternatives, and generally poor prognosis. Although there have been significant advancements in immunotherapy for hematological malignancies and various solid tumors in recent decades, with impressive outcomes in recent preclinical and clinical trials, the effectiveness of these therapies in treating PDAC continues to be modest. The unique immunological microenvironment of PDAC, especially the abnormal distribution, complex composition, and variable activation states of tumor-infiltrating immune cells, greatly restricts the effectiveness of immunotherapy. Undoubtedly, integrating data from both preclinical models and human studies helps accelerate the identification of reliable molecules and pathways responsive to targeted biological therapies and immunotherapies, thereby continuously optimizing therapeutic combinations. In this review, we delve deeply into how PDAC cells regulate the immune microenvironment through complex signaling networks, affecting the quantity and functional status of immune cells to promote immune escape and tumor progression. Furthermore, we explore the multi-modal immunotherapeutic strategies currently under development, emphasizing the transformation of the immunosuppressive environment into an anti-tumor milieu by targeting specific molecular and cellular pathways, providing insights for the development of novel treatment strategies.

Cell adhesion regulates specific migratory patterns, location, communication with other cells, physical interactions with the extracellular matrix, and the establishment of effector programs. Proper immune control of cancer strongly depends on all these events occurring in a highly accurate spatiotemporal sequence. In response to cancer-associated inflammatory signals, effector immune cells navigating the bloodstream shift from their patrolling exploratory migration mode to establish adhesive interactions with vascular endothelial cells. This interaction enables them to extravasate through the blood vessel walls and access the cancer site. Further adhesive interactions within the tumor microenvironment (TME) are crucial for coordinating their distribution in situ and for mounting an effective anti-tumor immune response. In this review, we examine how alterations of adhesion cues in the tumor context favor tumor escape by affecting effector immune cell infiltration and trafficking within the TME. We discuss the mechanisms by which tumors directly modulate immune cell adhesion and migration patterns to affect anti-tumor immunity and favor tumor evasion. We also explore indirect immune escape mechanisms that involve modifications of TME characteristics, such as vascularization, immunogenicity, and structural topography. Finally, we highlight the significance of these aspects in designing more effective drug treatments and cellular immunotherapies.

This study aims to investigate the interplay between tumor-associated endothelial cells (TECs) and immune cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME) and its impact on tumor prognosis. We conducted single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of tumor, normal, and lymph node tissues obtained from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients to reveal the role of TECs in tumor angiogenesis and their significant heterogeneity. Meanwhile, we identified genes highly expressed in TECs and constructed TEC signatures (TEC.Sig). Next, we calculated TEC scores of samples based on TEC.Sig. Patients with higher TEC scores exhibited a higher frequency of KRAS mutations, which was associated with increased infiltration of neutrophils and immature dendritic cells (iDCs), and decreased numbers of natural killer (NK), CD4 + T, and CD8 + T effector memory (Tem) cells, indicating an inflammation-dominated immunosuppressive phenotype. In contrast, BAP1 mutations and CXCL12 overexpression showed a contrasting trend. Spatial transcriptomics analysis and histological experiments further confirmed that TECs interacted with various tumor-killing immune cells through the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis. Multiple tumor immunotherapy datasets confirmed that the TEC.Sig could predict patient responses to immunotherapy. The TEC score is a promising and reliable biomarker for predicting genetic mutations and prognosis in ICC patients. Enhancing the regulation of the CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling pathway may represent a potential novel therapeutic target for ICC treatment.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is notorious for its resistance to various treatment modalities. The genetic heterogeneity of PDAC, coupled with the presence of a desmoplastic stroma within the tumor microenvironment (TME), contributes to an unfavorable prognosis. The mechanisms and consequences of interactions among different cell types, along with spatial variations influencing cellular function, potentially play a role in the pathogenesis of PDAC. Understanding the diverse compositions of the TME and elucidating the functions of microscopic neighborhoods may contribute to understanding the immune microenvironment status in pancreatic cancer. As we delve into the spatial biology of the microscopic neighborhoods within the TME, aiding in deciphering the factors that orchestrate this intricate ecosystem. This overview delineates the fundamental constituents and the structural arrangement of the PDAC microenvironment, highlighting their impact on cancer cell biology.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and is projected to be the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths by 2030. Mutations in KRAS are found in the vast majority of PDAC cases and plays an important role in the development of the disease. KRAS drives tumor cell proliferation and survival through activating the MAPK pathway to drive cell cycle progression and to lead to MYC-driven cellular programs. Moreover, activated KRAS promotes a protumorigenic microenvironment through forming a desmoplastic stroma and by impairing antitumor immunity. Secretion of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and protumorigenic macrophages results in an immunosuppressive environment while secretion of secrete sonic hedgehog and TGFβ drive fibroblastic features characteristic of PDAC. Recent development of several small molecules to directly target KRAS marks an important milestone in precision medicine. Many molecules show promise in preclinical models of PDAC and in early phase clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the underlying cell intrinsic and extrinsic roles of KRAS in PDAC tumorigenesis, the pharmacologic development of KRAS inhibition, and therapeutic strategies to target KRAS in PDAC.

The pleiotropic roles of nSMase2-generated ceramide include regulation of intracellular ceramide signaling and exosome biogenesis. We investigated the effects of eliminating nSMase2 on early and advanced PDA, including its influence on the microenvironment. Employing the KPC mouse model of pancreatic cancer, we demonstrate that pancreatic epithelial nSMase2 ablation reduces neoplasia and promotes a PDA subtype switch from aggressive basal-like to classical. nSMase2 elimination prolongs survival of KPC mice, hinders vasculature development, and fosters a robust immune response. nSMase2 loss leads to recruitment of cytotoxic T cells, N1-like neutrophils, and abundant infiltration of anti-tumorigenic macrophages in the pancreatic preneoplastic microenvironment. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that nSMase2-expressing PDA cell small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) reduce survival of KPC mice; PDA cell sEVs generated independently of nSMase2 prolong survival of KPC mice and reprogram macrophages to a proinflammatory phenotype. Collectively, our study highlights previously unappreciated opposing roles for exosomes, based on biogenesis pathway, during PDA progression.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents a fatal clinical challenge characterized by a dismal 5-year overall survival rate, primarily due to the lack of early diagnosis and limited therapeutic efficacy. Immunotherapy, a proven success in multiple cancers, has yet to demonstrate significant benefits in PDAC. Recent studies have revealed the immunosuppressive characteristics of the PDAC tumor microenvironment (TME), including immune cells with suppressive properties, desmoplastic stroma, microbiome influences, and PDAC-specific signaling pathways. In this article, we review recent advances in understanding the immunosuppressive TME of PDAC, TME differences among various mouse models of pancreatic cancer, and the mechanisms underlying resistance to immunotherapeutic interventions. Furthermore, we discuss the potential of targeting cancer cell-intrinsic pathways and TME components to sensitize PDAC to immune therapies, providing insights into strategies and future perspectives to break through the barriers in improving pancreatic cancer treatment.

Currently, there are no optimal biomarkers available for distinguishing patients who will respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapies. Consequently, the exploration of novel biomarkers that can predict responsiveness to ICIs is crucial in the field of immunotherapy.

We estimated the proportions of 22 immune cell components in 10 cancer types (6,128 tumors) using the CIBERSORT algorithm, and further classified patients based on their tumor immune cell proportions in a pan-cancer setting using k-means clustering. Differentially expressed immune genes between the patient subgroups were identified, and potential predictive biomarkers for ICIs were explored. Finally, the predictive value of the identified biomarkers was verified in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received ICIs.

Our study identified two subgroups of patients with distinct immune infiltrating phenotypes and differing clinical outcomes. The patient subgroup with improved outcomes displayed tumors enriched with genes related to immune response regulation and pathway activation. Furthermore, CCL5 and CSF2 were identified as immune-related hub-genes and were found to be prognostic in a pan-cancer setting. Importantly, UC and ESCC patients with high expression of CCL5 and low expression of CSF2 responded better to ICIs.

We demonstrated CCL5 and CSF2 as potential novel biomarkers for predicting the response to ICIs in patients with UC and ESCC. The predictive value of these biomarkers in other cancer types warrants further evaluation in future studies.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-producing tumors have been reported in various organs, and the prognosis of patients with G-CSF-producing pancreatic cancers is particularly dismal. In this report, we present a case of G-CSF-producing anaplastic carcinoma of the pancreas (ACP), characterized by early postoperative recurrence and rapid, uncontrolled growth.

A 74-year-old man presented to our hospital with complaints of abdominal fullness and pain after eating. On admission, it was observed that the peripheral leukocyte counts and serum G-CSF levels were significantly elevated (23,770/µL and 251 pg/mL, respectively). Computed tomography of the abdomen revealed a pancreatic head tumor involving the superior mesenteric vein. Pathologically, ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration confirmed ACP. Subsequently, we performed a subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal vein reconstruction and partial transverse colon resection. On postoperative day (POD) 7, the leukocyte count decreased from 21,180/μL to 8490/μL; moreover, computed tomography revealed liver metastasis. Therefore, mFOLFILINOX chemotherapy was initiated on POD 30. However, the tumor exhibited rapid progression, and the patient died on POD 45.

G-CSF-producing ACP is rare, and the prognosis of patients is extremely poor. Basic research is required to develop effective drugs against G-CSF-producing tumors, and large-scale studies using national databases are needed to develop multidisciplinary treatment methods.

Innate inflammation promotes tumor development, although the role of innate inflammatory cytokines in established human tumors is unclear. Herein, we report clinical and translational results from a phase Ib trial testing whether IL1β blockade in human pancreatic cancer would alleviate myeloid immunosuppression and reveal antitumor T-cell responses to PD1 blockade. Patients with treatment-naïve advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 10) were treated with canakinumab, a high-affinity monoclonal human antiinterleukin-1β (IL1β), the PD1 blocking antibody spartalizumab, and gemcitabine/n(ab)paclitaxel. Analysis of paired peripheral blood from patients in the trial versus patients receiving multiagent chemotherapy showed a modest increase in HLA-DR+CD38+ activated CD8+ T cells and a decrease in circulating monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) by flow cytometry for patients in the trial but not in controls. Similarly, we used patient serum to differentiate monocytic MDSCs in vitro and showed that functional inhibition of T-cell proliferation was reduced when using on-treatment serum samples from patients in the trial but not when using serum from patients treated with chemotherapy alone. Within the tumor, we observed few changes in suppressive myeloid-cell populations or activated T cells as assessed by single-cell transcriptional profiling or multiplex immunofluorescence, although increases in CD8+ T cells suggest that improvements in the tumor immune microenvironment might be revealed by a larger study. Overall, the data indicate that exposure to PD1 and IL1β blockade induced a modest reactivation of peripheral CD8+ T cells and decreased circulating monocytic MDSCs; however, these changes did not lead to similarly uniform alterations in the tumor microenvironment.

Dysregulation of the epigenomic landscape of tumor cells has been implicated in the pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer. However, these alterations are not only restricted to neoplastic cells. The behavior of other cell populations in the tumor stroma such as cancer-associated fibroblasts, immune cells, and others are mostly regulated by epigenetic pathways. Here, we present an overview of the main cellular and acellular components of the pancreatic cancer tumor microenvironment and discuss how the epigenetic mechanisms operate at different levels in the stroma to establish a differential gene expression to regulate distinct cellular phenotypes contributing to pancreatic tumorigenesis.

Pancreatic and biliary tract cancers are digestive system tumors with dismal prognosis and limited treatment options. The effectiveness of conventional surgical interventions, radiation therapy, and systemic therapy is restricted in these cases. Furthermore, clinical trials have shown that immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors has only demonstrated modest clinical results when applied to patients with pancreatobiliary tumors. This highlights the importance of implementing combination immunotherapy approaches or exploring alternative therapeutic strategies to improve treatment outcomes.

We reviewed the relevant literature on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy for pancreatobiliary cancers from PubMed/Medline and ClinicalTrials.gov and retrieved the relevant data accordingly. Attention was additionally given to the examination of grey literature with the aim of obtaining additional details regarding ongoing clinical trials. We mainly focused on abstracts and presentations and e-posters and slides of recent important annual meetings (namely ESMO Immuno-Oncology Congress, ESMO Congress, ASCO Virtual Scientific Program, ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium).

CAR-T cell therapy has emerged as a promising and evolving treatment approach for pancreatic and biliary tract cancer. This form of adoptive cell therapy utilizes genetic engineering to modify the expression of specific antibodies on the surface of T cells enabling them to target specific cancer-associated antigens and to induce potent anti-tumor activity. The aim of this review is to provide an updated summary of the available evidence from clinical trials that have explored the application of CAR-T cell therapy in treating pancreatobiliary cancers.

While the utilization of CAR-T cell therapy in pancreatobiliary cancers is still in its initial phases with only a limited amount of clinical data available, the field is advancing rapidly, incorporating novel technologies to mitigate potential toxicities and enhance antigen-directed tumor eradication.

Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) is the most frequently mutated oncogene, occurring in various tumor types. Despite extensive efforts over the past 40 years to develop inhibitors targeting KRAS mutations, resistance to these inhibitors has eventually emerged. A more precise understanding of KRAS mutations and the mechanism of resistance development is essential for creating novel inhibitors that target specifically KRAS mutations and can delay or overcome resistance. Immunotherapy has developed rapidly in recent years, and in-depth dissection of the tumor immune microenvironment has led researchers to shift their focus to patients with KRAS mutations, finding that immune factors play an essential role in KRAS-mutant (KRAS-Mut) tumor therapy and targeted drug resistance. Breakthroughs and transitions from targeted therapy to immunotherapy have provided new hope for treating refractory patients. Here, we reviewed KRAS mutation-targeted treatment strategies and resistance issues, focusing on our in-depth exploration of the specific immune status of patients with KRAS mutations and the impact of body immunity following KRAS inhibition. We aimed to guide innovative approaches combining RAS inhibition with immunotherapy, review advances in preclinical and clinical stages, and discuss challenges and future directions.

RAS and MYC rank amongst the most commonly altered oncogenes in cancer, with RAS being the most frequently mutated and MYC the most amplified. The cooperative interplay between RAS and MYC constitutes a complex and multifaceted phenomenon, profoundly influencing tumor development. Together and individually, these two oncogenes regulate most, if not all, hallmarks of cancer, including cell death escape, replicative immortality, tumor-associated angiogenesis, cell invasion and metastasis, metabolic adaptation, and immune evasion. Due to their frequent alteration and role in tumorigenesis, MYC and RAS emerge as highly appealing targets in cancer therapy. However, due to their complex nature, both oncogenes have been long considered "undruggable" and, until recently, no drugs directly targeting them had reached the clinic. This review aims to shed light on their complex partnership, with special attention to their active collaboration in fostering an immunosuppressive milieu and driving immunotherapeutic resistance in cancer. Within this review, we also present an update on the different inhibitors targeting RAS and MYC currently undergoing clinical trials, along with their clinical outcomes and the different combination strategies being explored to overcome drug resistance. This recent clinical development suggests a paradigm shift in the long-standing belief of RAS and MYC "undruggability", hinting at a new era in their therapeutic targeting.

Modest response rates to immunotherapy observed in advanced lung cancer patients underscore the need to identify reliable biomarkers and targets, enhancing both treatment decision-making and efficacy. Factors such as PD-L1 expression, tumor mutation burden, and a 'hot' tumor microenvironment with heightened effector T cell infiltration have consistently been associated with positive responses. In contrast, the predictive role of the abundantly present tumor-infiltrating myeloid cell (TIMs) fraction remains somewhat uncertain, partly explained by their towering variety in terms of ontogeny, phenotype, location, and function. Nevertheless, numerous preclinical and clinical studies established a clear link between lung cancer progression and alterations in intra- and extramedullary hematopoiesis, leading to emergency myelopoiesis at the expense of megakaryocyte/erythroid and lymphoid differentiation. These observations affirm that a continuous crosstalk between solid cancers such as lung cancer and the bone marrow niche (BMN) must take place. However, the BMN, encompassing hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, differentiated immune and stromal cells, remains inadequately explored in solid cancer patients. Subsequently, no clear consensus has been reached on the exact breadth of tumor installed hematopoiesis perturbing cues nor their predictive power for immunotherapy. As the current era of single-cell omics is reshaping our understanding of the hematopoietic process and the subcluster landscape of lung TIMs, we aim to present an updated overview of the hierarchical differentiation process of TIMs within the BMN of solid cancer bearing subjects. Our comprehensive overview underscores that lung cancer should be regarded as a systemic disease in which the cues governing the lung tumor-BMN crosstalk might bolster the definition of new biomarkers and druggable targets, potentially mitigating the high attrition rate of leading immunotherapies for NSCLC.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a clinically challenging tumor to combat due to its advanced stage at diagnosis as well as its resistance to currently available therapies. The absence of early symptoms and known detectable biomarkers renders this disease incredibly difficult to detect/manage. Recent advances in the understanding of PC biology have highlighted the importance of cancer-immune cell interactions, not only in the tumor micro-environment but also in distant systemic sites, like the bone marrow, spleen and circulating immune cells, the so-called macro-environment. The response of the macro-environment is emerging as a determining factor in tumor development by contributing to the formation of an increasingly immunogenic micro-environment promoting tumor homeostasis and progression. We will summarize the key events associated with the feedback loop between the tumor immune micro-environment (TIME) and the tumor immune macroenvironment (TIMaE) in pancreatic precancerous lesions along with how it regulates disease development and progression. In addition, liquid biopsy biomarkers capable of diagnosing PC at an early stage of onset will also be discussed. A clearer understanding of the early crosstalk between micro-environment and macro-environment could contribute to identifying new molecular therapeutic targets and biomarkers, consequently improving early PC diagnosis and treatment.

Oncogenic KRAS impairs antitumor immune responses. As effective strategies to combine KRAS inhibitors and immunotherapies have so far proven elusive, a better understanding of the mechanisms by which oncogenic KRAS drives immune evasion is needed to identify approaches that could sensitize KRAS-mutant lung cancer to immunotherapy. In vivo CRISPR-Cas9 screening in an immunogenic murine lung cancer model identified mechanisms by which oncogenic KRAS promotes immune evasion, most notably via upregulation of immunosuppressive COX2 in cancer cells. Oncogenic KRAS potently induced COX2 in both mouse and human lung cancer, which was suppressed using KRAS inhibitors. COX2 acted via prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) to promote resistance to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in lung adenocarcinoma. Targeting COX2/PGE2 remodeled the tumor microenvironment by inducing proinflammatory polarization of myeloid cells and influx of activated cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, which increased the efficacy of ICB. Restoration of COX2 expression contributed to tumor relapse after prolonged KRAS inhibition. These results provide the rationale for testing COX2/PGE2 pathway inhibitors in combination with KRASG12C inhibition or ICB in patients with KRAS-mutant lung cancer. Significance: COX2 signaling via prostaglandin E2 is a major mediator of immune evasion driven by oncogenic KRAS that promotes immunotherapy and KRAS-targeted therapy resistance, suggesting effective combination treatments for KRAS-mutant lung cancer.