There is increasing recognition that the pathophysiology of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) plays a pivotal role in the development of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the mechanisms underlying this role are not known.

The Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation Mechanisms of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction Leading to Pre-Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (WISE Pre-HFpEF) is a prospective cohort study enrolling 180 women and men undergoing clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography for suspected ischemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease. The study aims to investigate (1) CMD-related ischemia contribution to myocellular damage and impaired left ventricular (LV) relaxation as determined invasively by ultra-high sensitivity cardiac troponin I (u-hs-cTnI) measurements in the coronary sinus/great cardiac vein and LV pressure-volume loops, respectively, during provocative stress testing with isometric handgrip, and (2) CMD-related ischemic myocellular damage contribution to LV diastolic dysfunction progression as assessed using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging obtained at enrollment and 1-2 years later, along with prospectively repeated ambulatory u-hs-cTnI measurements.

The WISE pre-HFpEF study is designed to investigate whether ischemic myocardial damage secondary to CMD contributes to the progression of LV diastolic dysfunction. The findings from this study will provide new understanding of the role of CMD in HFpEF development as well as the potential benefits of CMD-directed therapies for the prevention and treatment of HFpEF.

ClilicalTrial.gov, NCT03876223.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is well-known cause of angina, yet treatment options remain limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the current literature and provides a contemporary evaluation of treatments using a stringent definition for CMD with accurate methods of microvascular assessment in accordance with recent consensus guidelines. Methods and Results: A search strategy was conducted independently by two authors (CK and RR). Studies were required to be prospective trials in adult patients with documented CMD by IC doppler wire, thermodilution techniques, or perfusion imaging via PET/MRI. CMD was defined as either coronary flow reserve (CFR)/myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) < 2.5, and/or index of microvascular resistance (IMR) > 25. Methodological quality of studies was assessed via the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The primary and secondary endpoints were change in CFR/MPR/IMR and change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores respectively. Two-sided p-values were used and considered significant if p < 0.05. A total of 11,360 records were identified, from which 14 were included in this review covering 9 different treatments. Two treatments (quinapril and ranolazine) showed significant improvement in both CFR and angina. Three ranolazine trials were pooled in meta-analysis. The standardised mean difference showed a weak positive effect (0.24) with wide intervals (-0.21 to 0.26) which was not statistically significant (p = 0.20). We subsequently reviewed all treatments as mentioned in recent European consensus statements. Conclusions: The overall quality of evidence surrounding treatments for CMD is of "low", with lack of robust data highlighting the dire need for higher quality trials in this area.

Ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) is an increasingly recognized condition in patients presenting with angina and positive stress tests but without significant coronary artery stenosis. This review addresses the pathophysiology, diagnostic approaches, and management strategies associated with INOCA, emphasizing epicardial coronary spasms and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) as underlying mechanisms and myocardial bridging (MB) as a risk factor. Diagnostic modalities include both non-invasive techniques and invasive procedures, such as acetylcholine provocation testing, to differentiate vasospasm from microvascular causes. The paper discusses a potential interference between vasodilators used in trans-radial access and coronary spasm testing. Long-term management approaches for INOCA patients, including pharmacologic therapies and lifestyle interventions, are reviewed.

Coronary artery disease is one of the leading public health problems in the world in terms of mortality and economic burden from the disease. Traditionally, the focus of research and clinical pathways leading to the diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease was on the more common variant of the disease resulting from atherosclerosis in the epicardial coronary arteries. However, coronary microvasculature, representing the vast majority of the total heart circulation, has the greatest influence on overall coronary resistance and, therefore, blood flow. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), characterized by structural or functional abnormalities in the microvasculature, significantly impacts myocardial perfusion. Endothelial dysfunction results in inadequate coronary dilation during exercise or spontaneous spasm in the microvasculature or epicardial arteries. A significant proportion of people presenting for coronary angiography in the context of angina have unobstructed epicardial coronary arteries yet are falsely reassured about the benign nature of their condition. Meanwhile, increasing evidence indicates that patients diagnosed with CMD as well as vasospastic angina (VSA) face an increased risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACEs), including death. The aim of this review is to outline the current practice with regard to invasive and non-invasive methods of CMD and VSA diagnosis and assess the evidence supporting the existing treatment strategies. These include endotype-specific pharmacological therapies, a holistic approach to lifestyle modifications and risk factor management and novel non-pharmacological therapies. Furthermore, the review highlights critical gaps in research and suggests potential areas for future investigation, to improve understanding and management of these conditions.

Coronary microvascular disease (CMD) is one of the commonest causes of cardiac chest pain. The condition is more prevalent in women, and incidence is known to increase with age, hypertension, and diabetes. The pathophysiological pathways are heterogenous and related to intrinsic vascular and endothelial dysfunction. Furthermore, this entity is known to be associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Despite this, there is inertia amongst cardiologists to further evaluate patients with non-critical coronary artery disease and suspected CMD. With refinement in technology, we have now better understanding of CMD and invasive testing in the catheterization laboratory is a viable option for confirming the diagnosis of CMD. However, despite advances in diagnosing and stratifying this entity, therapeutic options remain limited and poorly defined. In this editorial, we will briefly focus on the pathophysiology and invasive assessment and therapeutic options available for CMD.

Coronary microvascular disease (CMD) comprises a spectrum of conditions characterized by the functional and structural abnormalities of coronary microcirculation, affecting vessels typically smaller than 500 μm. Despite its clinical significance as a contributor to myocardial ischemia, CMD frequently remains underdiagnosed due to the limitations of current diagnostic approaches. Invasive testing, including coronary reactivity assessment, is considered the gold standard, but it is resource-intensive and not always accessible. Non-invasive methods, such as positron emission tomography (PET) and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE), offer alternatives but are limited by varying accuracy and accessibility. Amid these diagnostic challenges, there is increasing interest in circulating biomarkers as adjuncts in CMD evaluation. Biomarkers associated with endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and oxidative stress, detectable through routine blood tests, may assist in CMD diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapeutic monitoring. These biomarkers can offer insights into CMD pathogenesis and enable early, non-invasive screening to identify patients who may benefit from more invasive investigations. This narrative review examines studies assessing biomarkers in CMD patients with diagnoses confirmed through invasive techniques. Our objective is to focus on circulating biomarkers linked to the invasive evaluation of coronary microcirculation, aiming to advance the understanding of the underlying mechanisms of this prevalent condition and enhance diagnostic accuracy and the clinical management of affected patients.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) comprises a wide spectrum of structural and/or functional abnormalities of coronary microcirculation that can lead to myocardial ischemia. Emerging evidence has indicated that CMD is a relevant cause of morbidity and mortality and is associated with a high risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction as well as poor quality of life. This review aims to elucidate briefly the pathogenesis and diagnostic modalities of CMD and to shed light on contemporary evidence on the prognostic impact of CMD. Finally, we will provide an overview of novel emerging therapeutic strategies for CMD.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a common cause of angina with no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA), and effective treatment options are limited.

This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus (CS) Reducer (Neovasc, Inc/Shockwave Medical) for treatment of angina in patients with CMD.

This Phase II trial enrolled 30 patients with ANOCA, invasively diagnosed CMD, and Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class 3 to 4 angina despite medical therapy. CMD was defined by coronary flow reserve (CFR) ≤2.5 and/or ≤50% increase in coronary blood flow (CBF) in response to intracoronary infusion of acetylcholine. Invasive coronary microvascular function testing was performed before and at 120 days postimplantation. The primary endpoint was change in microvascular function at 120 days. Secondary endpoints were changes in CCS angina class and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores.

Mean age was 54.8 ± 11.0 years; 67% (20/30) were women. In patients with low baseline CFR (endothelium-independent CMD), CFR increased significantly from 2.1 (1.95-2.30) to 2.7 (2.45-2.95) (n = 19; P = 0.0011). Patients with abnormal CBF response to acetylcholine at baseline (endothelium-dependent CMD) had an increase in CBF response to acetylcholine: -11.0% (-20.15% to 5.85%) to 11.5% (-4.82% to 39.29%) (n = 11; P = 0.042). There was a significant improvement in CCS angina class from 4.0 (3.25-4.0) to 2.0 (2.0-3.0) (P < 0.001) and increase in each domain of the SAQ questionnaire (P < 0.006 for all).

This study demonstrates that the CS Reducer is associated with significant improvement in angina, quality of life, and coronary microvascular function in patients with CMD and may emerge as a novel therapy for patients with ANOCA.

Few data are available on long-term drug therapy and its potential prognostic impact after Takotsubo syndrome (TTS). Aim of the study is to evaluate clinical characteristics and long-term outcome of TTS patients on Renin Angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi).

TTS patients were enrolled in the international multicenter GEIST (GErman Italian Spanish Takotsubo) registry. Median follow-up was 31 (Interquartile range 12-56) months. Comparison of RASi treated vs. untreated patients was performed within the overall population and after 1:1 propensity score matching for age, sex, comorbidities, type of trigger and in-hospital complications.

clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04361994, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04361994 RESULTS: Of the 2453 TTS patients discharged alive, 1683 (68%) received RASi therapy. Patients with RASi were older (age 71 ± 11 vs 69 ± 13 years, P = .01), with higher prevalence of hypertension (74% vs 53%, P < .01) and diabetes (19% v s15%, P = .01), higher admission left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (41 ± 11% vs 39 ± 12%, P < .01) and lower rates of in-hospital complications (18.9% vs 29.6%, P < .01). At multivariable analysis, RASi therapy at discharge was independently associated with lower mortality (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45-0.87, P < .01). Survival analysis showed that at long term, patients treated with RASi had lower mortality rates in the overall cohort (log-rank P = .001). However, this benefit was not found among patients treated with RASi in the matched cohort (log-rank P = .168). Potential survival benefit of RASi were present, both in the overall and matched cohort, in 2 subgroups: patients with admission LVEF ≤ 40% (HR 0.54 95% CI 0.38-0.78, P = .001; HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.95, P = .030) and diabetes (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23-0.73, P = .002; HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.82, P = .011).

Long-term therapy with RASi after a TTS episode was not associated with lower mortality rates at propensity score analysis. However, potential survival benefit can be found among patients with admission LVEF ≤ 40% or diabetes.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is an etiology for angina with non-obstructive coronary disease. However, the initial adoption of CMD assessment, whether planned or conducted ad hoc, is limited. We characterize planned and ad hoc CMD assessments and highlight evolving trends of a CMD referral center.

We analyzed outpatient data from the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry from 2021 to 2023. Patients were categorized into planned or ad hoc CMD assessment groups, and baseline characteristics, hospital stay, medications, and physiological measurements were compared. Secondary analysis evaluated a CMD referral center's evolution.

Of 101 included outpatients, 67.3 % underwent ad hoc procedures and 32.7 % planned procedures. Average age was 63.1 ± 10.1 years. The planned procedure group was 87.9 % female, and the ad hoc procedure group was 51.5 % female. There were no significant differences in index of microvascular resistance or coronary flow reserve between groups. Hospital stay duration was <1 day for both groups, and neither reported complications. Ad hoc patients were more frequently prescribed aspirin before (64.7 % vs. 36.4 %, p = 0.007) and after the procedure (66.2 % vs. 39.4 %, p = 0.01). CMD rates were higher for planned procedures (30.3 % vs. 10.3 %, p = 0.01). We observed that CMD referral centers have more planned procedures and a higher rate of positive results over time.

CMD referral centers' planned procedures, and subsequent positive cases, increased over time. This emphasizes the importance of planned procedures, appropriate patient selection, and increased awareness of CMD among healthcare providers.

Coronary Microvascular Disease (CMD) Registry, NCT05960474, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05960474.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) involves functional or structural abnormalities of the coronary microvasculature resulting in dysregulation of coronary blood flow (CBF) in response to myocardial oxygen demand. This perfusion mismatch causes myocardial ischemia, which manifests in patients as microvascular angina (MVA). CMD can be diagnosed non-invasively via multiple imaging techniques or invasively using coronary function testing (CFT), which assists in determining the specific mechanisms involving endothelium-independent and dependent epicardial and microcirculation domains. Unlike traditional coronary artery disease (CAD), CMD can often occur in patients without obstructive atherosclerotic epicardial disease, which can make the diagnosis of CMD difficult. Moreover, MVA due to CMD is more prevalent in women and carries increased risk of future cardiovascular events. Successful treatment of symptomatic CMD is often patient-specific risk factor and endotype targeted. This article aims to review newly identified mechanisms and novel treatment strategies for managing CMD, and outline sex-specific differences in the presentation and pathophysiology of the disease.

Qualitative myocardial perfusion (QMP) derived from myocardial contrast echocardiography reflects the capillary flow, while coronary flow velocity reserve from Doppler spectrum (D-CFVR) of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) is used to assess coronary microvascular function, particularly after excluding severe epicardial coronary stenosis. The present study aimed to assess the relationship of QMP and D-CFVR in detecting coronary microvascular disease (CMVD) by using adenosine triphosphate stress myocardial contrast echocardiography (ATP stress MCE).

Seventy-two patients (mean age: 54.22 ± 12.78 years) with chest pain and <50% coronary stenosis diagnosed by quantitative coronary angiography or dual-source CT underwent ATP stress MCE. The distribution of myocardial perfusion and CFVR value was estimated by experienced physicians. Of the 72 LAD with 0%-50% diameter stenosis, 15 (21%) exhibited abnormal CFVR and 31 (43%) displayed abnormal perfusion with ATP stress MCE. Eleven of the 15 LAD territories (73%) with abnormal CFVR values showed abnormal perfusion. However, CFVR was considered normal in 20 LAD territories (35%), despite the presence of perfusion defect in the territory.

Abnormal myocardial perfusion during ATP stress MCE was found in a sizable percentage of patients in whom CFVR of the supplying vessel was considered normal.

Lately, a large number of stable ischemic patients, with no obstructed coronary arteries are being diagnosed. Despite this condition, which is being described as angina with no obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA), was thought to be benign, recent evidence report that it is associated with increased risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes. ANOCA is more frequent in women and, pathophysiologically, it is predominantly related with microvascular dysfunction, while other factors, such as endothelial dysfunction, inflammation and autonomic nervous system seem to also play a major role to its development, while other studies implicate ANOCA and microvascular dysfunction in the pathogenesis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. For establishing an ANOCA diagnosis, measurement including coronary flow reserve (CFR), microvascular resistance (IMR) and hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR) are mostly used in clinical practice. In addition, new modalities, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) are being tested and show promising results for future diagnostic use. Regarding management, pharmacotherapy consists of a wide selection of drugs, according to the respected pathophysiology of the disease (vasospastic angina or microvascular dysfunction), while research for new treatment options including interventional techniques, is currently ongoing. This review, therefore, aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of all aspects related to ANOCA, from pathophysiology to clinical managements, as well as clinical implications and suggestions for future research efforts, which will help advance our understanding of the syndrome and establish more, evidence-based, therapies.

Cardiovascular disease is the predominant cause of mortality on a global scale. Research indicates that women exhibit a greater likelihood of presenting with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) when experiencing symptoms of myocardial ischemia in comparison to men. Additionally, women tend to experience a higher burden of symptoms relative to men, and despite the presence of ischemic heart disease, they are frequently reassured erroneously due to the absence of obstructive CAD. In cases of ischemic heart disease accompanied by symptoms of myocardial ischemia but lacking obstructive CAD, it is imperative to consider coronary microvascular dysfunction as a potential underlying cause. Coronary microvascular dysfunction, characterized by impaired coronary flow reserve resulting from functional and/or structural abnormalities in the microcirculation, is linked to adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Lifestyle modifications and the use of anti-atherosclerotic and anti-anginal medications may offer potential benefits, although further clinical trials are necessary to inform treatment strategies. This review aims to explore the prevalence, underlying mechanisms, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic interventions for coronary microvascular dysfunction.

The mechanism underlying ischaemic heart disease (IHD) has been primarily attributed to obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). However, non-obstructive coronary arteries are identified in >50% of patients undergoing elective coronary angiography, recently leading to growing interest in the investigation and management of angina/ischaemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA/INOCA). INOCA is an umbrella term encompassing a multiple spectrum of possible pathogenetic entities, including coronary vasomotor disorders which consist of two major endotypes: coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and vasospastic angina. Both conditions can coexist and be associated with concomitant obstructive CAD. Particularly, CMD refers to myocardial ischaemia due to reduced vasodilatory capacity of coronary microcirculation secondary to structural remodelling or impaired resting microvascular tone (functional) or a combination of both. CMD is not a benign condition and is more prevalent in women presenting with chronic coronary syndrome compared to men. In this setting, an impaired coronary flow reserve has been associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. ANOCA/INOCA patients also experience impaired quality of life and associated increased healthcare costs. Therefore, research in this scenario has led to better definition, classification, and prognostic stratification based on the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. The development and validation of non-invasive imaging modalities, invasive coronary vasomotor function testing and angiography-derived indices provide a comprehensive characterisation of CMD. The present narrative review aims to summarise current data relating to the diagnostic approach to CMD and provides details on the sequence that therapeutic management should follow.

Dysfunction of the coronary microvasculature has become increasingly recognized as an important mechanism of myocardial ischemia in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease. The causes and management of coronary microvascular dysfunction remain poorly understood and are still largely based on extrapolation of epicardial coronary artery disease data. Quantification of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve have improved diagnosis, though important questions remain. In this review, we explain current understanding of the spectrum of pathophysiology of coronary microvascular dysfunction, summarize current diagnostic techniques to assess for coronary microvascular dysfunction, and appraise the limited data on management options specifically for patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Angina pectoris may arise from obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) or in the absence of significant CAD (ischemia with nonobstructed coronary arteries [INOCA]). Therapeutic strategies for patients with angina and obstructive CAD focus on reducing cardiovascular events and relieving symptoms, whereas in INOCA the focus shifts toward managing functional alterations of the coronary circulation. In obstructive CAD, coronary revascularization might improve angina status, although a significant percentage of patients present angina persistence or recurrence, suggesting the presence of functional mechanisms along with epicardial CAD. In patients with INOCA, performing a precise endotype diagnosis is crucial to allow a tailored therapy targeted toward the specific pathogenic mechanism. In this expert opinion paper, we review the evidence for the management of angina, highlighting the complementary role of coronary revascularization, optimal medical therapy, and lifestyle interventions and underscoring the importance of a personalized approach that targets the underlying pathobiology.

The traditional approach to management of cardiovascular disease relies on grouping clinical presentations with common signs and symptoms into pre-specified disease pathways, all uniformly treated according to evidence-based guidelines ("one-size-fits-all"). The goal of precision medicine is to provide the right treatment to the right patients at the right time, combining data from time honoured sources (e.g., history, physical examination, imaging, laboratory) and those provided by multi-omics technologies. In patients with ischemic heart disease, biomarkers and intravascular assessment can be used to identify endotypes with different pathophysiology who may benefit from distinct treatments. This review discusses strategies for the application of stratified management to patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes.

Ischaemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) has been a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for decades. Several studies have demonstrated that INOCA is associated with an increased risk of death, adverse cardiovascular events, poor quality of life and high healthcare cost. Although there is increasing recognition of this entity in the Western population, in the Asian population, INOCA remains elusive and its prevalence uncertain. Despite its prognostic significance, diagnosis of INOCA is often delayed. In this review, we identified the multiple barriers to its diagnosis and management, and proposed strategies to overcome them.

This article provides a summary of the clinical spectrum of no obstructive coronary arteries. We describe the pathologies, invasive and noninvasive assessment, and management strategies.

Background and Objectives: The assessment of coronary microcirculation may facilitate risk stratification and treatment adjustment. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' clinical presentation and treatment following coronary microcirculation assessment, as well as factors associated with an abnormal coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) values. Materials and Results: This retrospective analysis included 223 patients gathered from the national registry of invasive coronary microvascular testing collected between 2018 and 2023. Results: The frequency of coronary microcirculatory assessments in Poland has steadily increased since 2018. Patients with impaired IMR (≥25) were less burdened with comorbidities. Patients with normal IMR underwent revascularisation attempts more frequently (11.9% vs. 29.8%, p = 0.003). After microcirculation testing, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were added more often for patients with IMR and CFR abnormalities, respectively, as compared to control groups. Moreover, patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD, defined as CFR and/or IMR abnormality), regardless of treatment choice following microcirculation assessment, were provided with trimetazidine (23.2%) and dihydropyridine CCBs (26.4%) more frequently than those without CMD who were treated conservatively (6.8%) and by revascularisation (4.2% with p = 0.002 and 0% with p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariable analysis revealed no association between angina symptoms and IMR or CFR impairment. Conclusions: The frequency of coronary microcirculatory assessments in Poland has steadily increased. Angina symptoms were not associated with either IMR or CFR impairment. After microcirculation assessment, patients with impaired microcirculation, expressed as either low CFR, high IMR or both, received additional pharmacotherapy treatment more often.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a common cause of ischemia but no obstructive coronary artery disease that results in an inability of the coronary microvasculature to meet myocardial oxygen demand. CMD is challenging to diagnose and manage due to a lack of mechanistic research and targeted therapy. Recent evidence suggests we can improved patient outcomes by stratifying antianginal therapies according to the diagnosis revealed by invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation. This review article appraises the evidence for management of CMD, which includes treatment of cardiovascular risk, antianginal therapy and therapy for atherosclerosis.

Cardiac disease is the leading cause of death in women. Among women with recurrent chest pain, abnormal electrocardiograms, and/or stress tests who undergo coronary angiography, as many as 50% have normal or <50% coronary artery obstructive disease. Pharmacologic stress assessment of coronary artery flow reserve in these women frequently demonstrates an inability to increase blood flow to >2.5 times normal flow. Contributory factors include abnormal epicardial or microvascular reactivity, microvascular remodeling or rarefaction, autonomic dysfunction, or coronary plaque rupture/erosion. Assessment is necessary of serum biomarkers and coronary artery flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, microvascular resistance, and epicardial/microvascular spasm. Aggressive treatment of women with positive tests is necessary because these women have an increased incidence of recurrent chest pain, repeated hospitalizations and coronary angiograms, and cardiac death.

Coronary vasomotor dysfunction embraces two specific clinical entities: coronary (micro)vascular spasm and microvascular dysfunction. The clinical manifestations of these entities are respectively called vasospastic angina (VSA) and microvascular angina (MVA). Over the years, these diseases have become more and more prominent and several studies aimed to investigate the best diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Patients with coronary vasomotor disorders are often undertreated due to the absence of evidence-based guidelines. The purpose of this overview is to illustrate the various therapeutic options available for the optimized management of these patients.

A Medline search of full-text articles published in English from 1980 to April 2022 was performed. The main analyzed aspects of vasomotor disorders were treatment options. We also performed research on "Clinicaltrial.gov" for ongoing trials.

Coronary (micro)vascular spasm and microvascular dysfunction are clinical entities characterized by high prevalence and clinical representation. Several therapeutic strategies, both innovative and established, are available to optimize treatment and improve the quality of life of these patients.

Increasing evidence has shown that coronary spasm and vasomotor dysfunction may be the underlying cause in more than half of myocardial infarctions with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) as well as an important cause of chronic chest pain in the outpatient setting. We review the contemporary understanding of coronary spasm and related vasomotor dysfunction of the coronary arteries, the pathophysiology and prognosis, and current and emerging approaches to diagnosis and evidence-based treatment.

Ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) is defined as patients with evidence of myocardial ischemia without obstructive coronary artery disease. About 3-4 million people in the United States have INOCA, more commonly affecting women, and carries adverse morbidity, mortality, and relatively high healthcare costs. The pathophysiology of INOCA appears to be multi-factorial with a variety of contributing mechanisms. Diagnosis of INOCA is suggested by non-invasive or invasive testing consistent with myocardial ischemia. Due to the high prevalence of coronary risk factors and atherosclerosis in the INOCA population, current treatment strategies target angina, coronary atherosclerosis, and atherosclerotic risk factors, as well as burgeoning treatment of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Ongoing clinical trials are assessing different options.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is becoming increasingly recognized as an important contributor to the development of ischemic heart diseases. Without obstructive coronary artery disease, the physiological function of the coronary microcirculation can be altered by structural, functional, and molecular factors, leading to myocardial ischemia. CMD can significantly impact the quality of life and prognosis and imposes a huge financial burden on healthcare systems and people. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) for treating CMD. A systematic literature review identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ACEIs with placebo in CMD patients. Review Manager, 5.3 for Windows, was utilized. Using the Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) method, improvement in coronary flow reserve (CFR) and systolic blood pressure events was pooled as mean difference (MD) in a meta-analysis model with a fixed effect model, whereas the number of chest pain episodes was pooled as MD with a random effect model. Five randomized controlled trials involving 209 patients were included in the analysis. The analysis demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in CFR in the ACEIs group compared to the placebo group (MD -0.3, 95% CI -0.61 to 0.01, P = 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the number of chest pain episodes between the ACEIs and placebo groups (MD 1.79, 95% CI -3.99 to 7.58, P = 0.54). Similarly, no significant difference in blood pressure change was observed between the two groups (MD 4.02, 95% CI -3.25 to 11.28, P = 0.28). In conclusion, the appropriate treatment for CMD is a source of contention because adequate data is lacking. Our findings suggest that ACEIs may have a positive effect on improving CFR in patients with microvascular angina. However, ACEIs did not demonstrate a significant impact on the number of chest pain episodes or systolic blood pressure in this patient population. Further research, including RCTs with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up durations, is warranted to provide more conclusive evidence on the role of ACEIs in CMD management.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a common cause of ischemia but no obstructive coronary artery disease that results in an inability of the coronary microvasculature to meet myocardial oxygen demand. CMD is challenging to diagnose and manage due to a lack of mechanistic research and targeted therapy. Recent evidence suggests we can improved patient outcomes by stratifying antianginal therapies according to the diagnosis revealed by invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation. This review article appraises the evidence for management of CMD, which includes treatment of cardiovascular risk, antianginal therapy and therapy for atherosclerosis.

Since the four working groups of the Chinese Society of Cardiology issued first expert consensus on coronary microvascular diseases (CMVD) in 2017, international consensus documents on CMVD have increased rapidly. Although some of these documents made preliminary recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of CMVD, they did not provide classification of recommendations and levels of evidence. In order to summarize recent progress in the field of CMVD, standardize the methods and procedures of diagnosis and treatment, and identify the scientific questions for future research, the four working groups of the Chinese Society of Cardiology updated the 2017 version of the Chinese expert consensus on CMVD and adopted a series of measures to ensure the quality of this document. The current consensus has raised a new classification of CMVD, summarized new epidemiological findings for different types of CMVD, analyzed key pathological and molecular mechanisms, evaluated classical and novel diagnostic technologies, recommended diagnostic pathways and criteria, and therapeutic strategies and medications, for patients with CMVD. In view of the current progress and knowledge gaps of CMVD, future directions were proposed. It is hoped that this expert consensus will further expedite the research progress of CMVD in both basic and clinical scenarios.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) comprises a variety of pathogenic mechanisms that impair the microcirculation of the heart. Clinical studies have shown that 30-50% of patients suffering from myocardial ischemia without significant coronary artery stenosis have CMD. The disease is associated with ele - vated mortality and poor quality of life. Whenever a patient presents with symptoms of angina pectoris and no underlying disease is detected by the usual methods, CMD should be considered a possible cause.

This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed and on current international guidelines and recommendations of specialty societies.

The diagnosis of CMD is based on objective evidence of a microvascular origin of symptoms. The guidelines contain a class IIa recommendation for invasive coronary flow reserve and microvascular resistance measurements. Noninvasive tests such as positron emission tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging are less accurate and are given a class IIb recommendation. No highquality therapeutic trials are available to date, and the treatment of CMD is thus based on that of chronic coronary syndrome. Lifestyle modification is performed to reduce risk factors. Patients with an abnormal coronary flow reserve or elevated microvascular resistance can be treated with an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker. Beta-blockers and calcium channel antagonists can relieve angina pectoris. Statins lower the LDL level and have positive pleiotropic effects. First-line treatment can be supplemented with further medications.

Approximately 25% of patients with CMD have symptoms that do not respond to intensive treatment with the currently available modalities. New treatments, including interventional therapies, are being studied. Their long-term benefit remains to be assessed and compared to that of the existing methods.

In the past decade, scientific and clinical research has provided a translational perspective on myocardial infarction (MI) with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). MINOCA is characterized by clinical documentation of an acute MI but angiography shows no significant coronary artery obstruction (stenosis <50%). The prevalence of MINOCA is estimated to range from approximately 6 to 10% among MI patients, and those with this condition have a poor prognosis, experiencing high rates of mortality, rehospitalization, and socioeconomic burden. MINOCA represents a major unmet need in cardiovascular medicine, with uncertain clinical management. It is a complex condition that can be caused by various factors, including atherosclerosis, plaque rupture, coronary vasospasm, and microvascular dysfunction. Effective management of MINOCA depends on identifying the underlying mechanism of the infarction, thus a systematic diagnostic approach is recommended. Contemporary data shows that a significant number of patients exhibit structural and functional abnormalities in coronary microcirculation, which is referred to as coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). CMD plays a crucial role in patients with signs and symptoms of myocardial ischemia and non-obstructive coronary artery stenosis, including MINOCA. Furthermore, conducting a thorough evaluation of coronary function can have significant prognostic and therapeutic implications, since personalized patient management strategies based on this assessment have been shown to improve symptoms and prognosis. Therefore, an accurate and timely diagnosis of CMD is essential for effective patient management, which can be achieved through various invasive and non-invasive methods. This review will discuss the pathophysiological understanding, current diagnostic techniques, and management strategies of patients with MINOCA and CMD.

The vascular endothelium is a multifunctional cellular system which directly influences blood components and cells within the vessel wall in a given tissue. Importantly, this cellular interface undergoes critical phenotypic changes in response to various biochemical and hemodynamic stimuli, driving several developmental and pathophysiological processes. Multiple studies have indicated a central role of the endothelium in the initiation, progression, and clinical outcomes of cardiac disease. In this review we synthesize the current understanding of endothelial function and dysfunction as mediators of the cardiomyocyte phenotype in the setting of distinct cardiac pathologies; outline existing in vivo and in vitro models where key features of endothelial cell dysfunction can be recapitulated; and discuss future directions for development of endothelium-targeted therapeutics for cardiac diseases with limited existing treatment options.

The purpose of this review is threefold: (i) to give an overview of well-established invasive methods for assessing patients with ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) in the cardiac catheterization laboratory; (ii) to describe the prognostic and treatment implications based on these findings, and (iii) to discuss current knowledge gaps and future perspectives.

Recent studies have demonstrated that invasive coronary function testing not only allows for risk stratification of patients with INOCA but also guides medical therapy with improvement in symptoms and quality of life. Based on these findings, invasive coronary function assessment is now a class 2a recommendation in the 2021 ACC/AHA chest pain guideline to improve the diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction and to enhance risk stratification. Invasive functional testing for patients with INOCA is well established and easily performed in the catheterization laboratory. Comprehensive invasive assessment is a key to differentiating INOCA endotypes and optimizing both medical therapy and preventive strategies including lifestyle modification.

Coronary microvascular endothelial cells (CMECs) react to changes in coronary blood flow and myocardial metabolites and regulate coronary blood flow by balancing vasoconstrictors-such as endothelin-1-and the vessel dilators prostaglandin, nitric oxide, and endothelium-dependent hyperpolarizing factor. Coronary microvascular endothelial cell dysfunction is caused by several cardiovascular risk factors and chronic rheumatic diseases that impact CMEC blood flow regulation, resulting in coronary microcirculation dysfunction (CMD). The mechanisms of CMEC dysfunction are not fully understood. However, the following could be important mechanisms: the overexpression and activation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase (Nox), and mineralocorticoid receptors; the involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) caused by a decreased expression of sirtuins (SIRT3/SIRT1); forkhead box O3; and a decreased SKCA/IKCA expression in the endothelium-dependent hyperpolarizing factor electrical signal pathway. In addition, p66Shc is an adapter protein that promotes oxidative stress; although there are no studies on its involvement with cardiac microvessels, it is possible it plays an important role in CMD.

Anginal symptoms in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease are frequently related to vasomotor disorders of the coronary circulation. Although frequently overlooked, a distinct diagnosis of different vasomotor disorders can be made by intracoronary function testing. Early detection and treatment seems beneficial, but little evidence is available for the medical treatment of these disorders. Nevertheless, there are several pharmacotherapeutic options available to treat these patients and improve quality of life.

We performed an extensive yet non-systematic literature search to explore available pharmacotherapeutic strategies for addressing vasomotor disorders in individuals experiencing angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease. This article presents a comprehensive overview of therapeutic possibilities for patients exhibiting abnormal vasoconstriction (such as spasm) and abnormal vasodilation (like coronary microvascular dysfunction).

Treatment of vasomotor disorders can be very challenging, but a general treatment algorithm based on the existing evidence and the best available current practice is feasible.

Centers specializing in coronary function testing are critical to ensure a systematic approach to the diagnosis and treatment of angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA). Management leveraging lifestyle, pharmacology, and device-based therapeutic options for ANOCA can improve angina burden and quality of life in affected patients. Multidisciplinary care teams that can tailor and titrate therapies based on individual patient needs are critical to the success of comprehensive programs. As coronary function testing for ANOCA is more widely adopted, collaborative research initiatives will be fundamental to improve ANOCA care. These efforts will require standardized symptom assessments and data collection, which will propel future large-scale clinical trials.

Abnormal structure and function of the coronary microvasculature have been implicated in the pathophysiology of multiple cardiovascular disease processes. This article reviews recent research progress related to coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and salient clinical takeaways.

CMD is prevalent in patients with signs and symptoms of ischemia and no obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease (INOCA), particularly in women. CMD is associated with adverse outcomes, including most frequently the development of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. It is also associated with adverse outcomes in patient populations including hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, and acute coronary syndromes. In patients with INOCA, stratified medical therapy guided by invasive coronary function testing to define the subtype of CMD leads to improved symptoms. There are invasive and non-invasive methodologies to diagnose CMD that provide prognostic information and mechanistic information to direct treatment. Available treatments improve symptoms and myocardial blood flow; ongoing investigations aim to develop therapy to improve adverse outcomes related to CMD.

A considerable number of patients with angina or myocardial ischemia have no significant coronary artery disease on invasive angiography. In recent years, several steps towards a better comprehension of the pathophysiology of these conditions, angina or ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA/INOCA), have been made. Nevertheless, several gaps in knowledge still remain. This review is intended to provide a comprehensive overview of ANOCA and INOCA, with a particular focus on pathophysiology, recent diagnostic innovations, gaps in knowledge and treatment modalities.