|
1
|
Muhammad S, Gao Y, Guan X, QingChao T, Fei S, Wang G, Chen Y, Liu Z, Jiang Z, Kaur K, Tatiana K, Ul Ain Q, Wang X, He J. Laparoscopic natural orifice specimen extraction, a minimally invasive surgical technique for mid-rectal cancers: Retrospective single-center analysis and single-surgeon experience of selected patients. J Int Med Res 2022; 50:3000605221134472. [PMID: 36440806 PMCID: PMC9712411 DOI: 10.1177/03000605221134472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and short-term outcomes of middle rectal resection followed by transanal specimen extraction. METHODS Forty-four patients with small mid-rectal tumors underwent laparoscopic rectal resection followed by transanal specimen extraction. RESULTS The procedure was successful in all patients without intraoperative conversion or additional access. The mean operation time was 182.7 minutes (range, 130-255 minutes), the mean blood loss was 26.5 mL (range, 5-120 mL), the mean postoperative exhaust time was 31.3 hours (range, 16-60 hours), and the mean length of hospital stay was 9.5 days (range, 8-19 days). One patient developed anastomotic leakage, which was treated by intravenous antibiotics and daily pelvic cavity flushes through the abdominal drainage tube. No infection-related complications or anal incontinence were observed. The mean tumor size was 2.1 cm (range, 1.6-3.2 cm), the mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 16.5 (range, 6-31), and the mean follow-up time was 8.5 months (range, 2-16 months). By the last follow-up, no signs of recurrence had been found in any patient. CONCLUSION The combination of standard laparoscopic proctectomy and transanal specimen extraction could become a well-established strategy for selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shan Muhammad
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National
Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical
Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
- Laboratory of Translational Medicine, National Cancer
Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese
Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021,
China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer
Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese
Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021,
China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital
of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China
| | - YiBo Gao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National
Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical
Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
- Laboratory of Translational Medicine, National Cancer
Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese
Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021,
China
| | - Xu Guan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer
Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese
Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021,
China
| | - Tang QingChao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital
of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China
| | - Shao Fei
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National
Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical
Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
- Laboratory of Translational Medicine, National Cancer
Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese
Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021,
China
| | - Guiyu Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital
of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China
| | - Yinggang Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital
of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer
Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese
Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021,
China
| | - Zheng Jiang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer
Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese
Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021,
China
| | - Kavanjit Kaur
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital
of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China
| | | | - Qurat Ul Ain
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital
of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China
| | - Xishan Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer
Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese
Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021,
China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital
of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China
| | - Jie He
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National
Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical
Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
- Laboratory of Translational Medicine, National Cancer
Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese
Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021,
China
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Wang J, Hong J, Wang Q, Luo F, Guo F. A Novel Method of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery (NOSES) during Laparoscopic Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2021; 2021:6610737. [PMID: 33574839 PMCID: PMC7857920 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6610737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
We propose a modification to the reconstruction method of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) during laparoscopic anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer (RC) and evaluated its feasibility and short-term safety by comparing surgical and postoperative outcomes with those of conventional LAR. Twenty patients with RC underwent "double-purse" NOSES-LAR from October 2017 to June 2018. Data of clinicopathological characteristics, surgical and postoperative outcomes, and follow-up findings in NOSES-LAR cases were collected and retrospectively compared with those of conventional LAR to clarify the clinical benefits. The median postoperative hospital stay was lower in the double-purse NOSES group than the conventional group (6.6 vs. 7.1 days, respectively). In the conventional group, anastomotic leakage and incision site infection occurred in one patient each. In contrast, there were no complications in the double-purse group. There were no significant differences in blood loss, surgical duration, and time of the first flatus between the two groups. Additionally, "double-purse" NOSES-LAR was more economical than the conventional LAR. "Double-purse" NOSES-LAR is a safe, feasible, and minimally invasive promising procedure for LAR of RC with faster recovery, while requiring less surgical skills and lower clinical costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200090, China
| | - Jun Hong
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200090, China
| | - Qianwei Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200090, China
| | - Fen Luo
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200090, China
| | - Fenghua Guo
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200090, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Ng HI, Sun WQ, Zhao XM, Jin L, Shen XX, Zhang ZT, Wang J. Outcomes of trans-anal natural orifice specimen extraction combined with laparoscopic anterior resection for sigmoid and rectal carcinoma: An observational study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97:e12347. [PMID: 30235691 PMCID: PMC6160107 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000012347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal carcinoma is currently the third most frequent cancer worldwide. Conventional open surgery was replaced by laparoscopic anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for the treatment of sigmoid and rectal carcinomas; however, it needed an incision to harvest the specimen, which contributed to complications. In 2013, trans-anal natural orifice specimen extraction laparoscopic anterior resection (Ta-NOSE-LAR) to treat sigmoid and rectal carcinoma was performed in our hospital for the first time. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of Ta-NOSE-LAR in sigmoid and rectal carcinoma.Seventy-three patients diagnosed with sigmoid and rectal carcinoma were enrolled between September 2013 and June 2016. Thirty-five patients underwent Ta-NOSE-LAR, whereas the others underwent traditional laparoscopic anterior resection (LAR). We compared the operative data, postoperative complications, pathological evaluation results, and incision-related complications between the 2 groups.Our result showed that the operative time, specimen length, tumor size, amount of total lymph nodes, and lymph node metastasis between the 2 groups were not statistically different. Further, without abdominal scaring for harvesting the specimen, the operative blood loss (49.29 ± 14.63 vs 69.29 ± 13.54 mL, P < .001) and post-operation hospital stay (5.77 ± 0.94 vs 6.76 ± 0.75 days, P < .001) of the Ta-NOSE-LAR group were less than those of the LAR group. Besides, the follow-up data showed that 2 patients were lost to follow-up, and 1 patient had liver metastasis 2 years after surgery in the LAR group, whereas the others showed no regional recurrence, distant metastases, or critical complications.Ta-NOSE-LAR is a valuable and alternative surgical method to treat sigmoid and rectal carcinoma, with the advantages of being a scarless procedure and having a lower post-operation hospital stay duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoi-Ioi Ng
- General Surgery Department of Beijing Friendship Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University
- National Digestive Disease Center, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Wu-qing Sun
- General Surgery Department of Beijing Friendship Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University
- National Digestive Disease Center, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Xiao-mu Zhao
- General Surgery Department of Beijing Friendship Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University
- National Digestive Disease Center, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Lan Jin
- General Surgery Department of Beijing Friendship Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University
- National Digestive Disease Center, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Xi-xi Shen
- General Surgery Department of Beijing Friendship Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University
- National Digestive Disease Center, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Zhong-tao Zhang
- General Surgery Department of Beijing Friendship Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University
- National Digestive Disease Center, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Jin Wang
- General Surgery Department of Beijing Friendship Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University
- National Digestive Disease Center, Beijing, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Zattoni D, Popeskou GS, Christoforidis D. Left colon resection with transrectal specimen extraction: current status. Tech Coloproctol 2018; 22:411-423. [PMID: 29948523 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1806-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 05/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Full laparoscopic left colectomy with transrectal specimen extraction is proposed as an improvement of the minimally invasive surgical technique. This paper reviews in detail the current status of left-sided colectomy and upper rectum resection with transrectal specimen extraction. METHODS A systematic review was performed of all types of publications on colorectal resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE). We only included studies reporting on left colectomy, sigmoidectomy, and high anterior resection with transrectal specimen extraction (TRSE), excluding transanal (TASE), transvaginal, or transcolonic specimen extraction. Surgical techniques, patient characteristics, and outcomes were reviewed in detail. RESULTS Thirty-five papers reported on TRSE (2 randomized clinical trials, 7 case-matched series, 19 case series, 5 case reports, and 2 articles on surgical technique). We found a wide variety of innovative anastomotic and specimen extraction techniques. After excluding duplicates and papers reporting mixed TRSE and TASE results, outcomes in patients undergoing TRSE from 23 publications showed a conversion rate to conventional laparoscopy of 3.7% (21/559), overall morbidity 9.5% (53/559) [major in 2.9% (16/559), intra-abdominal infection in 2.1% (12/559)]. No mortality was reported. Postoperative anal incontinence was rarely reported. Several studies showed a decrease in postoperative pain and some in length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS Colectomy with TRSE is feasible and seems safe in selected patients. Reported outcomes seem in general similar to conventional laparoscopic colectomy with a possible benefit in postoperative pain and length of hospital stay. Obvious selection bias and lack of high quality trials do not allow firm conclusions to be drawn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Zattoni
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale per gli Infermi di Faenza, 48018, Faenza, Italy.
| | - G S Popeskou
- Department of General Surgery, Queen Elisabeth University Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - D Christoforidis
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale Civico di Lugano, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Totally Laparoscopic Resection for Low Sigmoid and Rectal Cancer Using Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Techniques. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2018; 27:e74-e79. [PMID: 28731950 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A minilaparotomy for specimen extraction during laparoscopy occasionally results in postoperative wound complications. We have performed a totally laparoscopic resection for early colorectal cancer using the natural orifice specimen extraction technique. METHODS From 2008 to 2013, we have performed a totally laparoscopic resection for clinical stage I and IIA low sigmoid colon and rectal cancers. A prospectively maintained database was reviewed to assess the outcomes after surgery. RESULTS In total, 40 patients had high anterior resections using transanal specimen extraction, and 32 patients had low anterior resections with transanal pull-through. Eight patients (11%) reported conversion to conventional laparoscopic colorectal resections; anastomotic leakages occurred in 4 patients (5.6%). No mortality or cancer recurrence was observed during 42.5±16.2 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS One natural orifice specimen extraction technique, known as transanal specimen extraction, has emerged as a promising form of totally laparoscopic surgical intervention for early-stage cancers of the low sigmoid colon and rectum.
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Cheong C, Kim NK. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Indian J Surg Oncol 2017; 8:591-599. [PMID: 29203993 PMCID: PMC5705499 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-017-0624-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2016] [Accepted: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Although laparoscopic resection for colon cancer has been proven safe and feasible when compared with open resection, currently no clear evidence is available regarding minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. This type of surgery may benefit patients by allowing fast recovery of normal dietary intake and bowel function, reduced postoperative pain, and shorter hospitalization. Therefore, minimally invasive surgeries such as laparoscopic or robot surgery have become the predominant treatment option for colon cancer. Specifically, the proportion of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Korea increased from 42.6 to 64.7% until 2013. However, laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is more difficult and technically demanding. In addition, the procedure requires a prolonged learning curve to achieve equivalent outcomes relative to open surgery. It is very challenging to approach the deep and narrow pelvis using laparoscopic instruments. However, robotic surgery provides better vision with a high definition three-dimensional view, exceptional ergonomics, Endowrist technology, enhanced dexterity of movement, and a lack of physiologic tremor, facilitated by the use of an assistant in the narrow and deep pelvis. Recently, an increasing number of reports have compared the outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for colon cancer. Such reports have prompted a discussion of the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery, including robotic surgery, for rectal cancer. The aim of this review is to summarize current data regarding the clinical outcomes, including oncologic outcomes, of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chinock Cheong
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752 South Korea
| | - Nam Kyu Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752 South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Uptake of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision in North America: Initial Assessment of a Structured Training Program and the Experience of Delegate Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 2017; 60:1023-1031. [PMID: 28891845 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transanal total mesorectal excision is a new approach to curative-intent rectal cancer surgery. Training and surgeon experience with this approach has not been assessed previously in America. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to characterize a structured training program and to determine the experience of delegate surgeons. DESIGN Data were assimilated from an anonymous, online survey delivered to attendees on course completion. Data on surgeon performance during hands-on cadaveric dissection were collected prospectively. SETTINGS This study was conducted at a single tertiary colorectal surgery referral center, and cadaveric hands-on training was conducted at a specialized surgeon education center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The main outcome measurement was the use of the course and surgeon experience posttraining. RESULTS During a 12-month period, eight 2-day transanal total mesorectal excision courses were conducted. Eighty-one colorectal surgeons successfully completed the course. During cadaveric dissection, 71% achieved a complete (Quirke 3) specimen; 26% were near complete (Quirke 2), and 3% were incomplete (Quirke 1). A total of 9.1% demonstrated dissection in the incorrect plane, whereas 4.5% created major injury to the rectum or surrounding structures, excluding the prostate. Thirty eight (46.9%) of 81 surgeon delegates responded to an online survey. Of survey respondents, 94.6% believed training should be required before performing transanal total mesorectal excision. Posttraining, 94.3% of surgeon delegates planned to use transanal total mesorectal excision for distal-third rectal cancers, 74.3% for middle-third cancers, and 8.6% for proximal-third cancers. The most significant complication reported was urethral injury; 5 were reported by the subset of survey respondents who had performed this operation postcourse. LIMITATIONS The study was limited by inherent reporting bias, including observer and recall biases. CONCLUSIONS Although this structured training program for transanal total mesorectal excision was found to be useful by the majority of respondents, the risk of iatrogenic injury after training remains high, suggesting that this training pedagogy alone is insufficient. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A335.
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent developments in classical minimally invasive surgical procedures for colon resection aimed to minimize or even eliminate abdominal wall incisions, thus improving postoperative pain, patient recovery and aesthetics. A promising approach is the total laparoendoscopic colectomy (LEC) with transanal sample extraction. The aim of this study was the comparison of total LEC with conventional laparoscopic assisted surgery (LAS) and extraction incision. METHOD We included 168 consecutive patients (LEC:112; LAS:56) with diverticular disease, rectal prolapse, benign or malignant tumors and analyzed retrospectively. The specimen was extracted transanally by LEC with a specially developed rectoscope; the LAS group required a minilaparotomy of 5 cm. The primary outcome was postoperative pain. Secondary outcomes included operating time, minor and major complication rates, number and length of extracted specimens, additional pain medication and duration of hospital stay. RESULTS The measured postoperative pain score values did not significantly differ between the two groups; however, consumption of postoperative pain medication was significantly higher in the LAS-group (p < 0.001). Due to the learning curve, the median operating time in the LEC group (120 min) was slightly longer than in the LAS group (100 min); however, it was reduced to 95 min in the last 50 operations. Patients in the LEC group were discharged from hospital one day earlier (median duration of hospital stay 6 days, p = 0.003). Compliaction rates were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION The technique of total LEC with transanal specimen extraction is designed to avoid a minilaparotomy and its associated morbidities. The LEC operation is feasible for a large group of patients, including overweight patients. The superiority of LEC in terms of reduced pain medication, shorter hospital stay and faster patient recovery, as shown in this study, needs to be confirmed by randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up periods.
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Huang CC, Chen YC, Huang CJ, Hsieh JS. Totally Laparoscopic Colectomy with Intracorporeal Side-to-End Colorectal Anastomosis and Transrectal Specimen Extraction for Sigmoid and Rectal Cancers. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 23:1164-8. [PMID: 26597363 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4984-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The techniques of intracorporeal anastomosis and specimen extraction after laparoscopic colectomy via a natural orifice have gained interest increasingly. We evaluated the feasibility of our unique techniques for colorectal reconstruction and report immediate postoperative outcomes in patients with rectosigmoid cancer. METHODS Patients with sigmoid or rectal cancer were selected depending on the size of the tumor and its distance from the anal verge. Demographic data, operative parameters, and postoperative outcomes were assessed. After complete resection of the tumor, all patients underwent an intracorporeal side-to-end colorectal anastomosis following transrectal specimen extraction. RESULTS Laparoscopic resection with our technique of intracorporeal anastomosis was successful in 32 patients. The average operative time was 192 ± 29 min, and mean blood loss was 51 ± 18 ml. All patients experienced mild postoperative pain, and bowel function returned before postoperative day 3 in most patients. They had an uneventful postoperative course with a median hospital stay of 6 days. Major perioperative complications or anastomotic leak were not encountered in this study. The mean size of the lesion was 3.3 ± 1.8 cm, and the mean number of harvested nodes was 14 ± 6. During the follow-up period, there were no functional disorders associated with the intracorporeal anastomosis or transrectal specimen extraction. CONCLUSIONS Intracorporeal side-to-end colorectal anastomosis with transrectal specimen extraction in laparoscopic colorectal surgery is a safe and effective procedure for patients with rectosigmoid malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao-Chun Huang
- Department of Surgery, Pingtung Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Pingtung, Taiwan
| | - Yin-Che Chen
- Department of Surgery, Pingtung Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Pingtung, Taiwan
| | - Che-Jen Huang
- Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jan-Sing Hsieh
- Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Wolthuis AM, Overstraeten ADBV, D’Hoore A. Laparoscopic natural orifice specimen extraction-colectomy: A systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:12981-12992. [PMID: 25278692 PMCID: PMC4177477 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i36.12981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2013] [Revised: 03/28/2014] [Accepted: 04/29/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the last 20 years, laparoscopic colorectal surgery has shown equal efficacy for benign and malignant colorectal diseases when compared to open surgery. However, a laparoscopic approach reduces postoperative morbidity and shortens hospital stay. In the quest to optimize outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal surgery, reduction of access trauma could be a way to improve recovery. To date, one method to reduce access trauma is natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE). NOSE aims to reduce access trauma in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The specimen is delivered via a natural orifice and the anastomosis is created intracorporeally. Different methods are used to extract the specimen and to create a bowel anastomosis. Currently, specimens are delivered transcolonically, transrectally, transanally, or transvaginally. Each of these NOSE-procedures raises specific issues with regard to operative technique and application. The presumed benefits of NOSE-procedures are less pain, lower analgesia requirements, faster recovery, shorter hospital stay, better cosmetic results, and lower incisional hernia rates. Avoidance of extraction site laparotomy is the most important characteristic of NOSE. Concerns associated with the NOSE-technique include bacterial contamination of the peritoneal cavity, inflammatory response, and postoperative outcomes, including postoperative pain and the functional and oncologic outcomes. These issues need to be studied in prospective randomized controlled trials. The aim of this systematic review is to describe the role of NOSE in minimally invasive colorectal surgery.
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Sajid MS, Bhatti MI, Sains P, Baig MK. Specimen retrieval approaches in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections: a literature-based review of published studies. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2014; 2:251-61. [PMID: 25146342 PMCID: PMC4219147 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/gou053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the published studies reporting various specimen retrieval incisions being used by colorectal surgeons in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections (LCR). METHODS Standard medical electronic databases were searched to find relevant articles and a summary conclusion was generated. RESULTS There were 43 studies reporting various approaches used for the purpose of specimen retrieval in 2388 patients undergoing LCR. The most common approaches were periumbilical midline incision (1260 reported case in the literature), transverse incision (583 reported cases in the literature) in the right- or left iliac fossa, depending on the side of colonic resection, and Pfannensteil incision (293 reported cases in the literature). Periumbilical midline incision was associated with the higher risk of developing incisional hernia (odds ratio 53.72; 95% confidence interval 7.48-386.04; Z = 3.96; P = 0.0001). In terms of surgical site infection (SSI), there was no difference between the three common approaches to specimen retrieval. Transanal and transvaginal approaches were associated with higher risk of SSI. CONCLUSIONS Midline, transverse and Pfannensteil incisions were the most commonly used approaches for specimen retrieval following LCR. Midline incision was associated with higher risk of incisional hernia. Risk of SSI was similar in all three common approaches. The transanal and transvaginal approaches pose a higher risk of SSI. These conclusions are based on the combined outcome of published case series, case reports and comparative studies. Randomized, controlled trials with longer follow-up are required before recommending the routine use of any approach for specimen retrieval in patients undergoing LCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad S Sajid
- Department of General & Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery, Worthing Hospital, Worthing, UK and Department of General Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kings Lynn NHS Foundation Trust, Kings Lynn, UK
| | - Muhammad I Bhatti
- Department of General & Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery, Worthing Hospital, Worthing, UK and Department of General Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kings Lynn NHS Foundation Trust, Kings Lynn, UK
| | - Parv Sains
- Department of General & Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery, Worthing Hospital, Worthing, UK and Department of General Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kings Lynn NHS Foundation Trust, Kings Lynn, UK
| | - Mirza K Baig
- Department of General & Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery, Worthing Hospital, Worthing, UK and Department of General Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kings Lynn NHS Foundation Trust, Kings Lynn, UK
| |
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Leung ALH, Cheung HYS, Fok BKL, Chung CCC, Li MKW, Tang CN. Prospective randomized trial of hybrid NOTES colectomy versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for left-sided colonic tumors. World J Surg 2014; 37:2678-82. [PMID: 23942527 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2163-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We conducted a randomized study of a laparoscopic technique for removing left-sided colon tumors that can reduce postoperative pain and other wound-related complications compared to the conventional technique. It is a novel technique of hybrid natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) colectomy (HNC) whereby laparoscopic colonic mobilization, transection, and anastomosis are performed intracorporeally. The specimen is then delivered through the anus using the transanal endoscopic operation (TEO) device, precluding the need for mini-laparotomy. We compared the short-term outcomes of patients who underwent HNC with those who underwent conventional laparoscopic colectomy (CL). METHODS Patients suffering left-sided colonic tumor were recruited and were randomized into two groups: HNC and CL. Operative data and complications were prospectively recorded and analyzed. RESULTS During a 3-year period, we recruited 70 patients (35 per group). No significant difference was observed between the two groups with respect to operating time (105 vs. 100 min, p = 0.851), blood loss (30 vs. 30 ml, p = 0.954), or length of hospital stay (5 vs. 5 days, p = 0.990). The maximum pain score during the first week was significantly lower in the HNC group (1 vs. 2, p = 0.017). No patients in the HNC group developed wound infection, whereas four patients in the CL group did so (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS With this hybrid NOTES technique, selected patients with left-sided colonic tumors can enjoy the full benefits of minimally invasive surgery with significantly less wound pain and a lower wound infection rate than are observed with CL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Lik Hang Leung
- Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, 3 Lok Man Road, Chai Wan, Hong Kong SAR, China,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
13
|
Akladios C, Faller E, Afors K, Puga M, Albornoz J, Redondo C, Leroy J, Wattiez A. Totally laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) techniques, particularly suitable for bowel endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21:1095-102. [PMID: 24858985 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2014] [Revised: 03/16/2014] [Accepted: 05/14/2014] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the feasibility of natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) techniques in 41 patients undergoing bowel resection for treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis. In all patients laparoscopic treatment of rectovaginal endometriosis with bowel resection had been performed. In 32 patients the classic approach was adopted (group 1), and in 9 a NOSE technique was performed (group 2). Demographic, operative, and postoperative data were compared. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 16.0. When needed, qualitative variables were compared using the χ(2) test or the Fisher exact test. Quantitative variables using the t-test were used. The threshold of statistical significance was set at p = .05. No statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups. Eight complications (19.5%) were observed, 2 minor (4.8%) and 6 major (14.6%). Of major complications, 2 were observed in the NOSE group (n = 2; 22.2%). It was concluded that the NOSE technique is a feasible approach in patients undergoing bowel resection for treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cherif Akladios
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Emilie Faller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Karolina Afors
- Institut de Recherche Contre le Cancer de l'Appareil Digestif, Strasbourg, France
| | - Marco Puga
- Institut de Recherche Contre le Cancer de l'Appareil Digestif, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jaime Albornoz
- Institut de Recherche Contre le Cancer de l'Appareil Digestif, Strasbourg, France
| | - Christina Redondo
- Institut de Recherche Contre le Cancer de l'Appareil Digestif, Strasbourg, France
| | - Joel Leroy
- Institut de Recherche Contre le Cancer de l'Appareil Digestif, Strasbourg, France
| | - Arnaud Wattiez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
|
14
|
Rodríguez-Zentner H, Juárez H, Ríos J, Cáceres M, López J. Total colectomy with transvaginal specimen extraction due to colonic inertia. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGÍA DE MÉXICO (ENGLISH EDITION) 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2013.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
|
15
|
Total colectomy with transvaginal specimen extraction due to colonic inertia. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGÍA DE MÉXICO 2014; 79:153-4. [PMID: 24656513 DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2013.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2013] [Revised: 06/05/2013] [Accepted: 07/31/2013] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
|
16
|
Franklin ME, Liang S, Russek K. Natural orifice specimen extraction in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: transanal and transvaginal approaches. Tech Coloproctol 2012; 17 Suppl 1:S63-7. [PMID: 23250638 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-012-0938-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2011] [Accepted: 09/06/2011] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was designed to evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent various laparoscopic colorectal procedures with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) at our institute over a 20-year period. Specifically, the study aimed to investigate whether transanal and transvaginal approaches are safe and effective alternatives for extracting the specimen during laparoscopic colorectal surgeries. METHODS We analyzed a prospectively designed database of a consecutive series of patients who underwent various laparoscopic colorectal surgeries for different rectal pathologies between April 1991 and May 2011 at the Texas Endosurgery Institute. The selection criteria for the NOSE approach were based on disease entities, site and size of tumors, and distance of colorectal lesions from the anal verge. RESULTS A total of 303 patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal procedures with the NOSE approach for specimen extraction, including 277 transanal and 26 transvaginal extractions. The operative time for procedures with transanal specimen extraction was 164.7 ± 47.5 min, the estimated blood loss was 87.5 ± 46.7 ml, and the rate of postoperative complications was 3.6 %. For laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with transvaginal specimen extraction, the operative time was 159 ± 27.1 min and the estimated blood loss was 83.5 ± 14.4 ml. Intraoperatively, transvaginal extraction was associated with 2 complications (7.7 %); however, this procedure was not associated with any postoperative complications. The length of hospital stay was 6.9 ± 2.8 and 5.5 ± 2.5 days for patients who underwent transanal extraction and transvaginal extraction, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Both transanal and transvaginal specimen extractions in laparoscopic colorectal surgeries are safe and effective approaches with comparable postoperative complication rates. In comparison with transanal specimen extraction, transvaginal extraction is more complicated due to the anatomy of the pouch of Douglas. The transvaginal approach thus needs more effective extraction devices for preventing injury to adjacent organs, especially the sigmoid colon and rectum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M E Franklin
- The Texas Endosurgery Institute, 4242 E Southcross Blvd., Suite 1, San Antonio, TX 78222, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
17
|
Wolthuis AM, Van Geluwe B, Fieuws S, Penninckx F, D'Hoore A. Laparoscopic sigmoid resection with transrectal specimen extraction: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14:1183-8. [PMID: 22022977 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02869.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
AIM A systematic review was performed to identify differences in surgical technique, postoperative morbidity, length of hospital stay and safety for procedures involving left-sided laparoscopic colectomy with natural orifice specimen extraction. METHOD A PubMed search was performed to retrieve studies reporting on left-sided laparoscopic colorectal resection with transrectal specimen extraction. The quality of the different reports was assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Six studies were included and all but one were cohort studies. Studies on transanal, transvaginal or transcolonic specimen extraction were excluded, as were reports on paediatric surgery. RESULTS Six papers (including 94 patients) fulfilled the search criteria. The techniques reported were not standardized and this technical heterogeneity hampered pooled analysis. A meta-analysis could also not be performed because of differences in inter-study methods, study population and results. All studies showed, nevertheless, that the technique is feasible with low morbidity and short postoperative hospital stay. No anal dysfunction was reported. CONCLUSION To date, the evidence in favour of left-sided laparoscopic colectomy with transrectal specimen extraction is weak (level IV-V). Future clinical research should focus on standardization of the technique. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to show the superiority of this approach with regard to postoperative pain and morbidity, hospital stay, recovery, function and cosmesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M Wolthuis
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Gasthuisberg Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
18
|
Franklin ME, Liang S, Russek K. Integration of transanal specimen extraction into laparoscopic anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a consecutive series of 179 patients. Surg Endosc 2012; 27:127-32. [PMID: 22833263 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2440-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2012] [Accepted: 06/05/2012] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES This prospective study focused on patients with rectal cancer who underwent transanal specimen extraction after laparoscopic anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and specifically aims to investigate whether the transanal approach can be accepted as a safe and effective method for extracting the malignant specimen from the peritoneal cavity. PATIENTS AND METHODS A prospectively designed database of a consecutive series of patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal malignancy with various tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classifications from April 1991 to May 2011 at the Texas Endosurgery Institute was analyzed. Patient selection for transanal specimen extraction and intracorporeal anastomosis was made on the basis of size of the pathology and distance of rectal lesions from the anal verge. RESULTS 179 anterior resections were completed laparoscopically with intracorporeal anastomosis and transanal specimen extraction. The operating time for the entire procedures including resection, anastomosis, and specimen extraction was 170.9 ± 51.2 min, blood loss during the procedures was 86.4 ± 37.7 ml, and distance of the lower edge of the lesion from the anal verge was measured to be 11.3 ± 7.3 cm. Postoperatively, three patients developed anastomotic leakage with a leak rate of 1.7%, and the overall major complication rate after the procedures was 5.0%. Length of hospital stay was 6.9 ± 2.8 days. Two-year follow-up showed development of anal stenosis in three patients (2.0%) and erectile dysfunction in one patient (0.36%) after surgery. Finally, 9 out of 179 patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection with transanal specimen extraction were confirmed to have cancer recurrence, with 2-year local recurrence rate of 5.0%. CONCLUSIONS Transanal specimen extraction in laparoscopic rectal cancer resection is a safe and effective approach with comparable local cancer recurrence rate and postoperative complication rates, suggesting it can be integrated into laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Collapse
|
|
19
|
Outcomes for consecutive patients undergoing single-site laparoscopic colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16:849-56. [PMID: 22125171 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1783-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2011] [Accepted: 11/11/2011] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single-site laparoscopy (SSL) represents an innovation whose wider adoption may be limited by technical challenges and a current dearth of outcomes data. METHODS A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed on all consecutive laparoscopic colorectal resections, including elective and emergent surgeries. Patient demographics and operative details were collected, and outcomes were analyzed for 30 days following surgery. RESULTS Forty-one single-site laparoscopic procedures were performed, with 12 (29%) being nonelective. Surgeries included seven right colectomies, eight sigmoidectomies, four ileocolectomies, five total colectomies, two low anterior resections, and two abdominoperineal resections. The most frequent indication for surgery was inflammatory bowel disease (31.7%), followed by cancer (24.4%) and diverticular disease (24.4%). Thirty-seven percent of the patients had undergone previous abdominal surgery, with 64% of these having undergone previous laparotomy. One (2.5%) patient required conversion to multiple trocar laparoscopy, and five (12%) required conversion to laparotomy. Mean length of hospital stay was 4.2 days for SSL without a conversion. There was one anastomotic leak, no postoperative bleeding, no surgical site infections, and no deaths. The readmission rate was 14%. CONCLUSIONS SSL is safe when applied to unselected patients undergoing colorectal surgery, including those patients who have undergone a previous laparotomy.
Collapse
|
|
20
|
Coomber RS, Sodergren MH, Clark J, Teare J, Yang GZ, Darzi A. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery applications in clinical practice. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 4:65-74. [PMID: 22442743 PMCID: PMC3309895 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v4.i3.65] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2011] [Revised: 01/25/2012] [Accepted: 03/02/2012] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
To review natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) applications in clinical practice and assess the evidence base for each application as reported in the literature. An electronic literature search was performed. Inclusion criteria were publications relating to NOTES applications in humans. For each type of operation the highest level of evidence available for clinical NOTES publications was evaluated. Morbidity and short-term operative outcomes were compared with gold standard published evidence where available. Finally, registered trials recruiting patients for NOTES applications were identified. Human NOTES publications with the highest level of evidence in each application are identified. There were no RCTs in the literature to date. The strongest evidence came in the form of large, multi-centre trials with 300-500 patients. The results are encouraging, comparable with gold standard techniques on morbidity and mortality. While short-term operative outcomes were also similar when compared to the gold standard techniques, other than improved cosmesis little else can definitely be concluded as a clear benefit of a NOTES procedure. The most common procedures are cholecystectomy, appendicectomy and peritoneoscopy mainly performed via transvaginal access. It is evident that morbidity appears to be higher when the transgastric route is used. The safety profile of hybrid NOTES transvaginal procedures is beginning to be confirmed as is evident from the large number of procedures presented in this review. A number of authors have presented work on pure NOTES procedures but the results are inconsistent and thus the vast majority of NOTES procedures worldwide are performed in a hybrid fashion with a variable amount of laparoscopy. This review of the clinical applications of NOTES summarises the growing evidence behind this surgical discipline and highlights NOTES procedures with an acceptable safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ross S Coomber
- Ross S Coomber, Mikael H Sodergren, James Clark, Julian Teare, Guang-Zhong Yang, Ara Darzi, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Hospital, South Wharf Rd, Paddington, W2 1NY, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
21
|
Diana M, Wall J, Costantino F, D'agostino J, Leroy J, Marescaux J. Transanal extraction of the specimen during laparoscopic colectomy. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13 Suppl 7:23-27. [PMID: 22098513 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02774.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
AIM To assess the current state of the art of transanal specimen extraction in colonic resections. METHOD A systematic literature search was conducted including the terms 'transrectal or transanal specimen extraction', 'Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction' and 'laparoscopic colectomy' for the period from 1955 to May 2011. Exclusion criteria were abdomino-perineal resections, pull-through technique, experimental studies and paediatric population. RESULTS Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria, representing 154 patients. The overall postoperative complication rate was 10%. The risks of peritoneal contamination and sphincter dysfunction were evaluated by a single study of each. CONCLUSION Transanal extraction is a feasible option to minimize incisions in colorectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Diana
- Department of Surgery, IRCAD/EITS, Hôpitaux Universitaires, Strasbourg, France
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
22
|
Awad ZT. Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with transrectal extraction of the colon and ileorectal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 2011; 26:869-71. [PMID: 21938571 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1926-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2011] [Accepted: 06/02/2011] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the growing acceptance of laparoscopic colon surgery, an abdominal incision is needed to remove the specimen and perform an anastomosis. METHODS Five trocars (one 12 mm and four 5 mm) were used. The video describes the technique of performing laparoscopic subtotal colectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, transrectal removal of the gallbladder and the entire colon, and intracorporeal stapled ileorectal anastomosis in a 27-year-old female with colonic inertia and biliary dyskinesia. RESULTS There were no intraoperative complications. The operating time was 180 min. Blood loss was 10 cc. The patient was discharged home on postoperative day 4. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with transrectal removal of the colon is a safe and effective procedure that can be added to the armamentarium of surgeons performing laparoscopic colon surgery. This technique may provide both an attractive way to reduce abdominal wall morbidity and a bridge to NOTES colon surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziad T Awad
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville, 633 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
|
23
|
Awad ZT. Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with transrectal extraction of the colon and ileorectal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 2011. [PMID: 21938571 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1926-4.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the growing acceptance of laparoscopic colon surgery, an abdominal incision is needed to remove the specimen and perform an anastomosis. METHODS Five trocars (one 12 mm and four 5 mm) were used. The video describes the technique of performing laparoscopic subtotal colectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, transrectal removal of the gallbladder and the entire colon, and intracorporeal stapled ileorectal anastomosis in a 27-year-old female with colonic inertia and biliary dyskinesia. RESULTS There were no intraoperative complications. The operating time was 180 min. Blood loss was 10 cc. The patient was discharged home on postoperative day 4. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with transrectal removal of the colon is a safe and effective procedure that can be added to the armamentarium of surgeons performing laparoscopic colon surgery. This technique may provide both an attractive way to reduce abdominal wall morbidity and a bridge to NOTES colon surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziad T Awad
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville, 633 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
|
24
|
Leroy J, Costantino F, Cahill RA, D'Agostino J, Morales A, Mutter D, Marescaux J. Laparoscopic resection with transanal specimen extraction for sigmoid diverticulitis. Br J Surg 2011; 98:1327-1334. [PMID: 21560119 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/22/2011] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This prospective study evaluated the technical aspects and microbiological consequences of laparoscopic resection with transanal specimen extraction and per ano transcolonic stapler anvil insertion in patients requiring elective operation for previous diverticulitis. METHODS Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy was performed with three ports, and specimen extraction carried out transanally through a complete opening of the rectal stump. A triple-stapled anastomosis restored colonic continuity. Systematic intraoperative bacteriological sampling was performed. Intraoperative data as well as microbiological and postoperative outcomes were evaluated prospectively. RESULTS Sixteen consecutive patients were studied over a 6-month period. All procedures were technically satisfactory, with a mean(s.d.) operating time of 120·9(41·9) min. No conversion or additional access was required. Four of the 16 patients developed complications, but none required intervention. Although polybacterial growth was present in all peritoneal culture samples, no infection-related complications were observed. Two patients had an extended course of perioperative antibiotic cover owing to overt peritoneal cavity contamination during surgery, and in two further patients antibiotics were instituted empirically following the development of postoperative fever alone. CONCLUSION Transanal specimen extraction in addition to per ano transcolonic stapler anvil insertion allows laparoscopic sigmoid resection to be performed with just three ports. Although intraperitoneal bacterial contamination occurs, this does not appear to translate into infectious morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Leroy
- Institute of Research Against Digestive Cancer-European Institute of TeleSurgery, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, 67091 Strasbourg Cedex, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
25
|
Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer: past, present, and future. Int J Surg Oncol 2011; 2011:490917. [PMID: 22312511 PMCID: PMC3263673 DOI: 10.1155/2011/490917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2011] [Accepted: 06/20/2011] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
A rapid progression from conventional open surgery to minimally invasive approaches in the surgical management of colorectal cancer has occurred over the last 2 decades. Initial concerns that this new approach was oncologically inferior to open surgery were ultimately refuted when several prospective randomized trials concluded that laparoscopic colectomy could achieve similar oncologic outcomes to open surgery. On the contrary, level 1 data has not yet matured regarding the oncologic safety of minimally invasive approaches for rectal cancer. We review the published literature pertaining to the evolution of minimally invasive techniques used to treat colorectal cancer surgery, including barriers to adoption, and the prospects for future advances related to innovative techniques.
Collapse
|
|
26
|
Lamadé W, Rieber F, Friedrich C, Basar T, Ulmer C, Bannier O, Thon KP. Sashimi NOTES--extraction of bulky specimens in no-scar operations. MINIM INVASIV THER 2011; 20:247-52. [PMID: 21793781 DOI: 10.3109/13645706.2010.541707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
A major obstacle in no-scar surgery is the extraction of large, bulky or rigid specimen. Thus, a method is needed that allows for extraction of large specimens without situs contamination in women and men. It should enable safe treatment of infectious or malignant disease while preserving pathologic workup. Five patients suffering from diverticulitis with expected bulky and rigid specimen were enrolled into this early series. Preparation was performed transumbilically in single-port technique. To prevent new scar formation, the incision was limited to the base of the umbilicus without extension onto the sound abdominal skin. A functionally and topologically extracorporeal compartment was created within the abdomen by introduction and insufflation of a tear-proof impermeable retrieval bag. The specimen was sliced in a controlled fashion inside the compartment along a pre-marked geometry. Controlled specimen dissection in a dedicated intraabdominal resection compartment was feasible. The dissected specimen could be retrieved through the 1.5 cm umbilical incision without spillage of material. The geometry of the extracted organ was reconstructed in detail allowing for uncompromised pathological workup. Extraction of bulky and rigid specimen is possible through natural orifices by the proposed controlled dissection method enabling the pathologist to reconstruct anatomical affiliation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfram Lamadé
- Department of Surgery, Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Stuttgart, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
Diana M, Perretta S, Wall J, Costantino FA, Leroy J, Demartines N, Marescaux J. Transvaginal specimen extraction in colorectal surgery: current state of the art. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13:e104-e111. [PMID: 21564461 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02599.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The expected benefit of transvaginal specimen extraction is reduced incision-related morbidity. OBJECTIVES A systematic review of transvaginal specimen extraction in colorectal surgery was carried out to assess this expectation. SEARCH STRATEGY The following keywords, in various combinations, were searched: NOSE (natural orifices specimen extraction), colorectal, colon surgery, transvaginal, right hemicolectomy, left hemicolectomy, low anterior resection, sigmoidectomy, ileocaecal resection, proctocolectomy, colon cancer, sigmoid diverticulitis and inflammatory bowel diseases. SELECTION CRITERIA SELECTION CRITERIA included large bowel resection with transvaginal specimen extraction, laparoscopic approach, human studies and English language. Exclusion criteria were experimental studies and laparotomic approach or local excision. All articles published up to February 2011 were included. RESULTS Twenty-three articles (including a total of 130 patients) fulfilled the search criteria. The primary diagnosis was colorectal cancer in 51% (67) of patients, endometriosis in 46% (60) of patients and other conditions in the remaining patients. A concurrent gynaecological procedure was performed in 17% (22) of patients. One case of conversion to laparotomy was reported. In two patients, transvaginal extraction failed. In left- and right-sided resections, the rate of severe complications was 3.7% and 2%, respectively. Two significant complications, one of pelvic seroma and one of rectovaginal fistula, were likely to have been related to transvaginal extraction. The degree of follow up was specified in only one study. Harvested nodes and negative margins were adequate and reported in 70% of oncological cases. CONCLUSION Vaginal extraction of a colorectal surgery specimen shows potential benefit, particularly when associated with a gynaecological procedure. Data from prospective randomized trials are needed to support the routine use of this technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Diana
- IRCAD/EITS, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
29
|
Rieder E, Spaun GO, Khajanchee YS, Martinec DV, Arnold BN, Smith Sehdev AE, Swanstrom LL, Whiteford MH. A natural orifice transrectal approach for oncologic resection of the rectosigmoid: an experimental study and comparison with conventional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 2011; 25:3357-63. [PMID: 21556994 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1726-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2011] [Accepted: 04/02/2011] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A transrectal (TR) approach for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) makes sense for colorectal surgery because the colotomy can be incorporated into subsequent anastomosis. Because cancer is a primary indication for left-sided colon resection, oncologic standards will have to be met by a NOTES procedure. This study aimed to assess whether pure TR rectosigmoidectomy can be performed with strict adherence to oncologic principles compared with a conventional laparoscopically assisted approach (LAP). METHODS Human male cadavers were allocated to either TR (n = 4) or LAP (n = 2). A simulated sigmoid lesion was created at 25 cm. Transrectal retrograde mobilization of the rectosigmoid was performed using conventional transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) instrumentation. After ligation of the superior hemorrhoidal artery and further mobilization, the specimen was delivered transanally and divided extracorporeally. Using a circular stapler, NOTES colorectal anastomosis was performed. Lymph node yield, adequate resection margins, and operative time were compared with LAP. RESULTS Transrectal retrograde rectosigmoid dissection was achieved in all attempts (4/4) and showed numbers of lymph nodes (median, 5; range, 3-6) similar to the LAP group (median, 4.5; range, 2-7). One pure TR approach failed to resect the lesion. Three TR procedures required additional mobilization via an abdominal approach to provide adequate margins. The mean length of TR specimens was 16 ± 4 cm compared with 31 ± 9 cm achieved by LAP (p < 0.01). The TR operative time was significantly longer (247 ± 15 vs 110 ± 14 min). CONCLUSION Lymph node yield during TR rectosigmoidectomy was similar to that achieved by the LAP approach. However, conventional TEM instrumentation alone did not permit adequate colon mobilization. This indicates a need for flexible instrumentation or other technical solutions to perform true NOTES colectomies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erwin Rieder
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Program, Legacy Health, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
30
|
Nishimura A, Kawahara M, Suda K, Makino S, Kawachi Y, Nikkuni K. Totally laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy with transanal specimen extraction. Surg Endosc 2011; 25:3459-63. [PMID: 21553173 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1716-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2010] [Accepted: 03/28/2011] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conventional techniques for laparoscopic-assisted colectomy (LAC) require abdominal minilaparotomy for extraction of the specimen. Abdominal wound complications often increase the invasiveness of LAC. To decrease the incidence of wound complications, natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) has been reported. However, only a few devices that allow smooth extraction and reduced intracorporeal contamination have been reported previously. We performed totally laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy using transanal specimen extraction (TASE) and the Alexis(®) wound retractor (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA). We document this simple and safe technique and its short-term results. METHODS We prospectively collected data on 18 patients who underwent totally laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy with TASE from April 2009 to July 2010. Lymph node dissection and transection of proximal and distal colon were performed in conventional manner. The transected rectal stump was opened transversely, and a long Babcock grasper was inserted transanally through the opened rectal stump. One of a pair of Alexis rings was held and pulled out of the anus. The other ring was placed in the opened rectal stump. The specimen was then extracted transanally through the Alexis. After the Alexis had been removed, the rectal opening was reclosed with a linear stapler. End-to-end colorectal anastomosis was then performed using the double-stapling technique. RESULTS Transanal extraction was achieved in 17 cases. We switched to conventional LAC in a case involving a bulky specimen. In 16 cases not including the combined cholecystectomy case, mean operation time was 241 min. One case was complicated by anastomotic leakage and wound infection, while another had enterocolitis. Median hospital stay was 6 days. All patients remained disease free. Mean Wexner score at 12 months after operation was 2.3. CONCLUSION Totally laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy using TASE and the Alexis appears to be feasible, safe, and oncologically acceptable for selected cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Nishimura
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Nagaoka Chuo General Hospital, Nagaoka, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
31
|
Wolthuis AM, Meuleman C, Tomassetti C, D'Hooghe T, Fieuws S, Penninckx F, D'Hoore A. Laparoscopic sigmoid resection with transrectal specimen extraction: a novel technique for the treatment of bowel endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2011; 26:1348-55. [PMID: 21427115 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multidisciplinary laparoscopic treatment is the standard of care for radical treatment of deep infiltrating pelvic endometriosis. If bowel resection is necessary, a muscle-split or Pfannenstiel incision is also required. The avoidance of any laparotomy could decrease surgical stress response, give a faster return to normal bowel function, decrease post-operative pain and reduce wound complications and incisional hernias. We assessed post-operative outcome after a full laparoscopic sigmoid resection for bowel endometriosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-one patients who underwent elective full laparoscopic sigmoid resection for bowel endometriosis from September 2009 to September 2010 were matched for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class and BMI to 21 patients who underwent a conventional laparoscopic sigmoid resection. Groups were compared for peri-operative factors, complications, length of hospital stay, post-operative pain (Visual Analog Scale: VAS), analgesics consumption and inflammatory response (plasma C-reactive protein: CRP). RESULTS Median operating time was 15 min shorter with transrectal specimen extraction (P = 0.003). VAS-scores and use of analgesics were higher in the conventional laparoscopic group (P = 0.0005). Mean CRP-level tended to be higher in the transrectal specimen extraction group (38%, P = 0.054) but there was no difference in increase in CRP level between groups (P = 0.15). There were no anastomotic leaks or reinterventions in either group, and the median hospital stay was similar. At follow-up, no wound infections or incisional hernias were observed and no patients reported anal dysfunction. CONCLUSION Full laparoscopic sigmoid resection reduced operating times and decreased post-operative VAS-scores and analgesic requirements compared with the conventional laparoscopic sigmoid resection for bowel endometriosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M Wolthuis
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
32
|
García JIR, Gijón MM, Castro PG, Folgueras AL, González JJG. [Laparoscopic recto-sigmoidal resection with transanal extraction of the surgical specimen (NOSE) as a treatment for early colorectal cancer (description of the technique)]. Cir Esp 2011; 89:547-9. [PMID: 21315322 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2010.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2010] [Revised: 04/26/2010] [Accepted: 05/01/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
|
33
|
Saad S, Hosogi H. Laparoscopic left colectomy combined with natural orifice access: operative technique and initial results. Surg Endosc 2011; 25:2742-7. [PMID: 21301880 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1574-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2010] [Accepted: 12/24/2010] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery for colon resection has improved patient outcome, but a minilaparotomy still is necessary to extract the specimen and place the anvil of the circular stapler into the proximal colon. This wound can cause postoperative pain, wound infection, and hernia. This report describes a new approach that combine classical laparoscopic left colon resection and natural orifice access using an operating rectoscope, with the aim to minimize abdominal wall trauma. METHODS Laparoscopic left colon dissection for diverticular disease or small tumors was performed using a standard four-port technique. An operating rectoscope was transanally inserted into the rectum to remove the specimen and to pass the anvil of the circular stapler into the abdominal cavity. A straight needle was tied to the rod of the anvil to simplify its placement into the proximal colon so that a double-stapled anastomosis could be performed in the usual manner. Outcome parameters such as complications, conversions, operative time, and postoperative pain were prospectively recorded in a database. RESULTS Surgery was performed for 15 patients with diverticular disease or small tumors. No intraoperative complications or conversions occurred. The median operating time was 145 min. The postoperative pain level was low, and only 3 of 15 patients needed opioid analgesia on postoperative day 1. The median postoperative hospital stay was 7 days. Blood oozing from the anastomotic site in one patient was the only recorded adverse event. For malignancies, tissue margins and lymphadenectomy were oncologically adequate. The 4-week follow-up period was uneventful. CONCLUSION The described technique, a combination of laparoscopic and natural orifice surgery, has the potential to avoid incision-related morbidity of the minilaparotomy in laparoscopic left colon resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Saad
- Department of General Surgery, Clinic Gummersbach, Academic Hospital University of Cologne, Wilhelm-Breckow-Allee 20, 51643, Gummersbach, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
34
|
Saad S, Hosogi H. Natural orifice specimen extraction for avoiding laparotomy in laparoscopic left colon resections: a new approach using the McCartney tube and the tilt top anvil technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2011; 20:689-92. [PMID: 20874237 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2010.0303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Classical laparoscopic left colon resection requires a minilaparotomy. This wound can cause pain and morbidity. We describe our technique to avoid minilaparotomy by natural orifice specimen extraction. METHODS A four-port standard laparoscopic dissection for diverticular disease and small tumors of the left colon was performed. A silicon McCartney tube was transanally inserted into the rectum to remove the specimen and to pass the anvil of the circular stapler into the abdominal cavity. The head of the anvil was mechanically pretilted to facilitate introduction into the proximal colon. Double-stapled anastomosis was performed in the usual manner. RESULTS Eight patients with diverticular disease or small tumors were operated. There were no adverse events. Operating time ranged between 95 and 180 minutes. For malignancies, tissue margins and lymphadenectomy were oncologically adequate. Four week follow-up was uneventful. CONCLUSION The described natural orifice specimen extraction technique has the potential to avoid incision-related morbidity of the minilaparotomy in laparoscopic left colon resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Saad
- Department of General Surgery, Clinic Gummersbach, Academic Hospital, University of Cologne, Gummersbach, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
35
|
Combined single-port and endoluminal technique for laparoscopic anterior resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2011; 20:253-6. [PMID: 20729696 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0b013e3181e21b33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the technical feasibility and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic anterior resection using combined single-port and endoluminal technique. METHODS A single port was placed at the umbilicus. Sigmoid colon was retracted using transabdominal sutures. After adequate mobilization, the colon was stapled distal to the lesion using noncutting endostapler, and the rectum was opened distal to the staple line. The transanal endoscopic operation device was placed transanally and the anvil of a circular stapler was then delivered through the device into the peritoneal cavity. The anvil was placed intraluminally through a colotomy made proximal to the lesion; after this, the colon was transected above the colotomy site. The specimen was next delivered transanally through the transanal endoscopic operation device. Finally, the rectum was closed with endostapler and intracorporeal side-to-end colorectal anastomosis was constructed using the circular stapler. RESULTS This technique was attempted in an 80-year-old woman with a 3 cm sessile polyp in the distal sigmoid. Laparoscopic anterior resection was arranged as the polyp was not amenable to endoscopic removal. The operative time was 150 minutes. There was no intraoperative complication. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 6, with a maximum pain score of 3. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic anterior resection using this combined single-port and endoluminal technique is feasible for small lesions in the sigmoid colon or upper rectum. The technique avoids multiple trocar incisions and a minilaparotomy for specimen retrieval.
Collapse
|
|
36
|
Wolthuis AM, Penninckx F, D'Hoore A. Laparoscopic sigmoid resection with transrectal specimen extraction has a good short-term outcome. Surg Endosc 2010; 25:2034-8. [PMID: 21136110 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1472-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2010] [Accepted: 11/05/2010] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transrectal specimen extraction in laparoscopic sigmoid resection avoids a muscle-split incision for specimen retrieval. A technique for transrectal specimen extraction is described, and the results of a pilot study concerning feasibility are presented. METHODS All consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid resection with transrectal specimen extraction were included in this observational study. A specimen retrieval pouch was used to facilitate specimen extraction. All preoperative and operative data, postoperative morbidity, and short-term outcome were gathered in a database. RESULTS The described technique was used to treat 21 patients. The median age of the patients was 41 years (interquartile range [IQR], 34-66 years). The median body mass index (BMI) was 23 kg/m2 (IQR, 22-26 kg/m2), and 90% of the patients were women. Of the 21 patients, 13 (62%) underwent a resection for endometriosis, 5 (24%) had resection for diverticular disease, and 3 (14%) underwent a tumor resection. The median operating time was 105 min (IQR, 90-110 min), and the median intraoperative blood loss was 10 ml (IQR, 0-20 ml). All the procedures except one (95%) were performed within 2 h. The median length of the extracted specimen was 20 cm (IQR, 13-25 cm). There was one anastomotic leak (5%), treated by emergency laparotomy and creation of a new colorectal anastomosis. None of the patients required a temporary diverting stoma, and no postoperative mortality occurred. The median hospital stay was 6 days (IQR, 5-7 days). All the patients did well during a median follow-up period of 3.6 months, and none reported any anal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic sigmoid resection with transrectal specimen extraction is feasible and has a good short-term outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert M Wolthuis
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Gasthuisberg Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
37
|
Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Kim HJ, Park SY, Jun SH. Clinical outcome of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with transvaginal resection, anastomosis, and retrieval of specimen. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53:1473-9. [PMID: 20940594 DOI: 10.1007/dcr.0b013e3181f1cc17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of this study is to evaluate the technical feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of totally laparoscopic colectomy with transvaginal anastomosis and extraction of specimen in female patients with right-sided colon cancer. METHODS A review of prospectively collected database at the Kyungpook National University Hospital from April 2007 to December 2007 revealed a series of 14 consecutive patients affected by right colon cancer were operated by use of the totally laparoscopic colectomy with transvaginal anastomosis and extraction of specimen approach. For this approach, the bowel was fully mobilized and a D3 lymphadenectomy was performed with established laparoscopic technique, followed by transvaginal anastomosis and removal of the resected specimen. Data regarding clinicopathological outcomes, surgical morbidity, and short-term oncologic results were analyzed. RESULTS No case required an open conversion, but in 2 patients the planned transvaginal retrieval of the specimen was aborted because of inadequate posterior colpotomy. The median operative time was 150.0 minutes (range, 110-330 min) and the median blood loss was 50.0 mL (range, 20.0-115 mL). The median tumor size was 4.0 cm and the number of harvested lymph nodes was 36.0 (range, 13-65). There was no surgical mortality or major morbidity, except one case of postoperative ileus that was conservatively managed. No patient experienced complications directly associated the transvaginal approach; nor did any patient have infection or prolonged spotting from the extraction site postoperatively. Recovery after the procedure was rapid and the median hospital stay was 7.0 days (range, 6-12 d). With a median follow-up 34 months, one patient experienced distant metastasis (7.1%). CONCLUSIONS In selected cases, totally laparoscopic colectomy with transvaginal anastomosis and extraction of specimen is feasible and reproducible and may be an alternative technique for treatment of women with right colon cancer. This approach may provide both an attractive way to increase patient comfort and a bridge to "pure" natural orifice colon surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Seok Park
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
38
|
Rieder E, Swanstrom LL. Advances in cancer surgery: natural orifice surgery (NOTES) for oncological diseases. Surg Oncol 2010; 20:211-8. [PMID: 20832296 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2010.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a new concept that attempts to reduce the impact of surgery on the patient. In surgical oncology several studies have already revealed that a minimally invasive approach provides at least the same, if not a better, long-term outcome. One could hypothesize that a less invasive approach such as NOTES could further enhance such advantages. Since its initial description, NOTES has become clinical reality and today nearly every organ is accessible by a transluminal approach, in at least the experimental setting. Subsequent to published research, first clinical studies on NOTES in oncology were reported and the accuracy of transgastric peritoneoscopy for staging of pancreas cancer was shown to be similar to laparoscopy in humans. A NOTES gastro-jejunostomy via transgastric access has also been proposed to decrease invasiveness of palliative treatment of duodenal, biliary and pancreatic cancers. Colorectal cancer resection via transanal access would offer a clear-cut patient advantage over laparoscopic and would not be subject to the frequent criticism of violating an innocent second organ, as the colon or rectum is always breached in a colectomy. Natural orifice endoluminal therapies, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection, already have been clinically applied for several years. Improved techniques or instruments evolving from NOTES technology might enhance its widespread use for the treatment of early malignancies and thereby again will provide a tremendous benefit for the patient. Although still somewhat controversial, the subject of natural orifice surgery in oncological disease indicates that current laboratory efforts to introduce NOTES into cancer surgery could be ready for cautious clinical investigations. The final determination of patient benefit will need well-constructed prospective study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erwin Rieder
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Program, Legacy Health, Portland OR, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
39
|
Leroy J, Costantino F, Cahill RA, Donnatelli GF, Kawai M, Hurng Sheng Wu, Marescaux J. Fully laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis involving percutaneous endoluminal colonic anvil control (PECAC). Surg Innov 2010; 17:79-84. [PMID: 20504781 DOI: 10.1177/1553350610371335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A novel technique for secure placement of the anvil for mechanical stapled anastomosis in the proximal colon without exteriorization of the bowel is described. METHODS After standard laparoscopic segmental colonic mobilization, a needle-cannula from a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy kit is passed under direct endoscopic vision transparietally into the colon at the site intended for anvil placement. A wire passed through the cannula into the colon is then withdrawn endoscopically per ano. The stapler anvil is fixed to the wire and pulled back along the intestine before being positioned by traction through the needle puncture site. After distal specimen transection, a standard stapled anastomosis is performed. RESULTS The technique is illustrated in 2 patients undergoing laparoscopic sigmoidectomy by either a single port or a multiport procedure with transanal specimen extraction. CONCLUSION By positioning the anvil without colon exteriorization, this technique enables pure intraperitoneal colonic anastomoses that may advance natural orifice operating.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joël Leroy
- IRCAD/EITS, Hopitaux Universitaires, Strasbourg, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
40
|
Eshuis EJ, Voermans RP, Stokkers PCF, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Fockens P, Bemelman WA. Laparoscopic resection with transcolonic specimen extraction for ileocaecal Crohn's disease. Br J Surg 2010; 97:569-74. [PMID: 20155789 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease can be performed entirely laparoscopically. However, an incision is needed for specimen extraction. This prospective observational study assessed the feasibility of endoscopic transcolonic specimen removal. METHODS Endoscopic specimen removal was attempted in a consecutive series of ten patients scheduled for laparoscopic ileocolic resection. Primary outcomes were feasibility, operating time, reoperation rate, pain scores, morphine requirement and hospital stay. To assess applicability, outcomes were compared with previous data from patients who had laparoscopically assisted operations. RESULTS Transcolonic removal was successful in eight of ten patients; it was considered not feasible in two patients because the inflammatory mass was too large (7-8 cm). Median operating time was 208 min and median postoperative hospital stay was 5 days. After surgery two patients developed an intra-abdominal abscess, drained laparoscopically or percutaneously, and one patient had another site-specific infection. The operation took longer than conventional laparoscopy, with no benefits perceived by patients in terms of cosmesis or body image. CONCLUSION Transcolonic removal of the specimen in ileocolic Crohn's disease is feasible in the absence of a large inflammatory mass but infection may be a problem. It is unclear whether the technique offers benefit compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J Eshuis
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
41
|
|