Primary graft dysfunction is a major early complication following liver transplantation, potentially leading to retransplantation or patient death. Coagulation Factor V (FV) and ALT have emerged as important biomarkers in assessing liver function, yet their role as early predictors of graft loss has not been fully validated. The aim of this study is to conduct an internal validation of published results on the applicability of FV and ALT for diagnosing graft dysfunction and its predictive ability for graft loss within the first 90 days. We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 513 adult recipients from 2012 to 2023 at the Regional University Hospital of Málaga. FV and ALT levels were measured on postoperative day 2, and patients were categorized based on FV <37.5 and ALT >1539. The association with 90-day graft loss was analyzed. Graft loss occurred in 43 patients (8.4%) within the first 90 days. The combination of FV <37.5 and ALT >1539 on postoperative day 2 demonstrated a specificity of 99% and a test efficiency of 94% in predicting graft loss. Patients meeting both criteria had a 74-fold increased risk of graft loss, with most losses occurring within the first week, and a median survival of 4 days. These findings suggest that FV and ALT on postoperative day 2 are reliable early markers for predicting graft loss, enabling risk stratification and guiding critical decisions regarding early retransplantation in the immediate postoperative period.

Given the scarce donor supply, an increasing number of so-called marginal or extended criteria donor (ECD) organs are used for liver transplantation. These ECD liver grafts are however known to be associated with a higher rate of early allograft dysfunction and primary non-function because of a greater vulnerability to ischemia-reperfusion injury. The end-ischemic hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) technique may improve outcomes of liver transplantation with ECD grafts by decreasing reperfusion injury.

HOPExt trial is a comparative open-label, multicenter, national, prospective, randomized, controlled study, in two parallel groups, using static cold storage, the gold standard procedure, as control. The trial will enroll adult patients on the transplant waiting list for liver failure or liver cirrhosis and/or liver malignancy requiring liver transplantation and receiving an ECD liver graft from a brain-dead donor. In the experimental group, ECD liver grafts will first undergo a classical static cold (4 °C) storage followed by a hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) for a period of 1 to 4 h. The control group will consist of the classic static cold storage which is the gold standard procedure in liver transplantation. The primary objective of this trial is to study the efficacy of HOPE used before transplantation of ECD liver grafts from brain-dead donors in reducing postoperative early allograft dysfunction within the first 7 postoperative days compared to simple cold static storage.

We present in this protocol all study procedures in regard to the achievement of the HOPExt trial, to prevent biased analysis of trial outcomes and improve the transparency of the trial results. Enrollment of patients in the HOPExt trial has started on September 10, 2019, and is ongoing.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03929523. Registered on April 29, 2019, before the start of inclusion.

Liver transplantation remains the only definitive treatment for advanced liver disease and liver failure. Current allocation schemes utilized for liver transplantation mandate a 'sickest first' approach, thus most liver transplants occur in patients with severe systemic illness. For intensive care providers who care for liver transplant recipients, a foundation of knowledge of technical considerations of orthotopic liver transplantation, basic management considerations, and common complications is essential. This review highlights the authors' approach to intensive care management of the postoperative liver transplant recipient with a review of common issues, which arise in this patient population.

The number of centers offering liver transplantation continues to increase globally and the number of patients receiving liver transplantation also continues to increase. The number of patients with advanced liver disease far outpaces organ availability and, therefore, patients undergoing liver transplant are sicker at the time of transplant. Outcomes for liver transplant patients continue to improve owing to advancements in surgical technique, immunosuppression management, and intensive care management of liver disease both pretransplant and posttransplant.

Given a global increase in liver transplantation, an increasing number of intensive care professionals are likely to care for this patient population. For these providers, a foundational knowledge of the common complications and key management considerations is essential.

Despite continuous progress in the field of liver transplantation, considerable proportion of patients still suffer from the postoperative graft dysfunction. Clinically, it presents as early allograft dysfunction (EAD), and its more severe form defined as primary nonfunction (PNF). Posttransplant liver dysfunction translates into significantly worse treatment outcomes.

Both entities are multifactorial, with donor (graft), recipient, and procedure-related factors playing the key roles. Ischemia-reperfusion injury is a major driver of their development. So far, various noninvasive (pharmacological) and invasive strategies have been tested to mitigate its negative effects. This article pre-sents the current approach to diagnosis, prediction, and management of EAD and PNF.

Different pharmacological interventions may be considered to improve graft function after liver transplantation. Machine perfusion seems to be the most effective method at the moment.

Introduction: Early graft dysfunction (EAD) complicates liver transplantation (LT). The aim of this analysis was to discriminate between the weight of each variable as for its predictive value toward patient and graft survival. Methods: We reviewed all LT performed at the Medical University of Innsbruck between 2007 and 2018. EAD was recorded when one of the following criteria was present: (i) aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels >2,000 IU/L within the first 7 days, (ii) bilirubin levels ≥10mg/dL or (iii) international normalized ratio (INR) ≥1.6 on postoperative day 7. Results: Of 616 LT, 30.7% developed EAD. Patient survival did not differ significantly (P = 0.092; log rank-test = 2.87), graft survival was significantly higher in non-EAD patients (P = 0.008; log rank-test = 7.13). Bilirubin and INR on postoperative day 7 were identified as strong mortality predictors (Bilirubin HR = 1.71 [1.34, 2.16]; INR HR = 2.69 [0.51, 14.31]), in contrast to AST (HR = 0.91 [0.75, 1.10]). Similar results were achieved for graft loss estimation. A comparison with the Model for Early Allograft Function (MEAF) and the Liver Graft Assessment Following Transplantation (L-GrAFT) score identified a superior discrimination potential but lower specificity. Conclusion: Contrarily to AST, bilirubin and INR have strong predictive capacity for patient and graft survival. This fits well with the understanding, that bile duct injury and deprivation of synthetic function rather than hepatocyte injury are key factors in LT.

Liver transplantation (LT) is a life-saving treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease and acute liver failure. However, in-hospital death cannot be avoided. We designed this study to analyze patients' in-hospital mortality rate after LT and the factors correlated with in-hospital death.

The data of patients who received LT in our hospital between January 11, 2015, and November 19, 2019, were obtained from the China Liver Transplant Registry and medical records. The in-hospital mortality rate was calculated, and factors related to mortality, cause of death, and factors related to cause of death were analyzed by reviewing patients' data.

A total of 529 patients who underwent cadaveric LT were enrolled in this study. Modified piggyback orthotopic LT was performed for all patients. Seventy patients died in the hospital after LT, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 13.2%. Factors including model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, Child-Pugh grading, intraoperative blood loss, and anhepatic phase were correlated with in-hospital death. MELD score and intraoperative blood loss were determined as the two independent risk factors of in-hospital death. The first two causes of death were infection (34.3%) and primary non-function (15.7%). Pulmonary fungal infection was the main cause of infectious death. MELD score was the independent risk factor for infectious death, and both body mass index of donors and cold ischemic time were independent risk factors of primary non-function.

In-hospital death poses a threat to certain patients undergoing LT. Our study suggests that the main cause of in-hospital death is an infection, followed by primary non-function.

The complement system anchors the innate inflammatory response by triggering both cell-mediated and antibody-mediated immune responses against pathogens. The complement system also plays a critical role in sterile tissue injury by responding to damage-associated molecular patterns. The degree and duration of complement activation may be a critical variable controlling the balance between regenerative and destructive inflammation following sterile injury. Recent studies in kidney transplantation suggest that aberrant complement activation may play a significant role in delayed graft function following transplantation, confirming results obtained from rodent models of renal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Deactivating the complement cascade through targeting anaphylatoxins (C3a/C5a) might be an effective clinical strategy to dampen reperfusion injury and reduce delayed graft function in liver transplantation. Targeting the complement cascade may be critical in donor livers with mild to moderate steatosis, where elevated lipid burden amplifies stress responses and increases hepatocyte turnover. Steatosis-driven complement activation in the donor liver may also have implications in rejection and thrombolytic complications following transplantation. This review focuses on the roles of complement activation in liver I/R injury, strategies to target complement activation in liver I/R, and potential opportunities to translate these strategies to transplanting donor livers with mild to moderate steatosis.

Ischemia/reperfusion injury during liver transplantation can cause severe damage to the graft. The objective of this randomized, double-blind study was to evaluate the possible protective effects of L-alanyl-glutamine on the liver graft.

The sample included 33 patients from a liver transplantation service in Northeastern Brazil. Before cold ischemia, the patients received 50 g of L-alanyl-glutamine (treatment group) or saline (control group) through the portal vein. The graft was biopsied at the time of recovery, at the beginning of warm ischemia, and at the end of transplantation to determine malondialdehyde (MDA), heat-shock protein (Hsp)70, nuclear factor kappa-beta (NFkB), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and reduced glutathione (GSH) levels.

The blood parameters were similar in the two groups. In the treatment group, MDA did not increase at the beginning of cold ischemia and decreased at the end of transplantation. This phenomenon was not observed in the control group. GSH, SOD, Hsp70, and NFkB levels were similar in the two groups.

Our findings suggest that preconditioning with L-alanyl-glutamine attenuates the effects of ischemia/reperfusion-related oxidative stress and reduces lipid peroxidation in the grafts of liver transplantation patients.

The susceptibility of extended criteria livers to ischemia reperfusion injury is a major obstacle in organ cold preservation. Normothermic extracorporeal liver perfusion (NELP) has been investigated to reduce ischemic damage, restore physiologic function, and assess viability of the liver prior to transplant. The goal of this study is to compare physiological parameters of livers maintained continuously on NELP to those preserved in cold solution.

Livers from 9 female landrace pigs were subjected to either 20 minutes (W20-NELP), 40 minutes (W40-NELP), or 60 minutes (W60-NELP) of warm ischemia followed by 6 hours of NELP followed by a 2-hour NELP evaluation phase. This was compared with 3 livers subjected to 40 minutes of warm ischemia time followed by 6 hours of cold storage (W40-Cold) and a 2-hour NELP evaluation phase. Groups were compared with the 2-way analysis of variance test.

NELP stabilized transaminases accompanied by significant improvement in bile production and decline in lactate and INR values in all W-NELP groups. Histologic analysis demonstrated significant improvement from 0 hour (mild-to-moderate sinusoidal dilation and zone 3 necrosis) to the end of the NELP run (minimal necrosis and mild IRI). Comparison of W40-NELP and W40-Cold revealed greater bile production and oxygen extraction ratio in W40-NELP. In contrast, markers of cellular and functional damage were increased in the W40-Cold group.

NELP improves metabolic and functional parameters of livers with either short or extended warm ischemia times compared with livers subjected to comparable cold ischemia times.

Early post-transplantation alterations in liver tests are caused by a variety of etiologies including rejection, biliary or vascular complications, and preservation/reperfusion injury (PRI).

The aim of this study was to show the correlation between histopathologic changes of PRI and the alterations in liver tests in the early post-transplantation period.

Between April 2013 and August 2014, histopathologic findings of protocol, time-zero, Tru-Cut, liver needle biopsies were evaluated in 94 cases of cadaveric liver transplantation. The histopathologic changes included ballooning degeneration, micro- and macro-vesicular steatosis, bilirubinostasis, apoptotic cells, bile plugs and neutrophilic infiltration. These histopathologic changes were compared with the early (15 days) post-transplantation liver laboratory findings.

Clinico-pathologic evaluation of all 94 cases was done by assessment of PRI findings in time-zero biopsies and possible causes of allograft injury were appraised. In 21 patients, a specific cause for allograft injury was found including rejection and/or surgical complications. In the remaining 73 cases, there was no specific cause for allograft injury and histopathologic findings of time-zero liver needle biopsies supported PRI. We classified liver laboratory tests alterations as: hepatocellular damage (elevation of transaminases and lactate dehydrogenase), cholestatic damage (elevation of alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin) and mixed. Hepatocellular and cholestatic alterations in liver function tests were associated with the presence of marked apoptotic bodies and neutrophilic aggregates in time zero biopsies, respectively. On the other hand, macrovesicular steatosis was dominantly associated with mixed (hepatocellular and cholestatic) laboratory alterations of liver tests.

Any discrepancy between histopathologic changes in time-zero biopsies and pattern of early liver laboratory alterations may be considered as a warning for causes other than PRI.

The effectiveness of liver preservation solutions remains in evidence. Cold ischemia time, steatosis, expanded criterion donors, operational cost, and survival represent important roles in its success. In a prospective cohort study between August 2009 and April 2014, 178 patients were allocated into an Institut Georges Lopez - 1 (IGL-1) solution group (63.5%) or histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) group (36.5%). There were no differences among recipient's characteristics including age, skin color, gender, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, acute rejection, cholestasis, and reperfusion syndrome incidences. Also, donors, age average, skin color, donor risk index, time in intensive care unit, hemodynamic variables, infections, and steatosis incidences were similar. The average cold ischemia time was 494 minutes in the IGL-1 group and 489 minutes in the HTK group (P = .77). Alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase serum levels on the first postoperative day were 707 and 1185 mg/dL, respectively, with IGL-1 and 1298 and 2291 mg/dL, respectively, with HTK (P = .016) and similar at day 15 (P > .88). The incidence of delayed graft function was 4.5% with IGL-1 and 4.6% with HTK (P = .90). The incidence primary nonfunction was 2.7% with IGL-1 and 3.1% with HTK (P = .71). The incidence of perioperative death was 11.5% with IGL-1 and 13.8% with HTK (P = .94). The survival in 30 months was 86% in IGL-1 group and 82% in HTK group (P = .66). Both preservation solutions are efficient to liver transplantations with deceased donors. Major prospective trials are necessary to evaluate each preservation solution's particularities. The preservation solution availability in each transplantation center must guide its use at the present moment.

The balance of risk (BAR) is a prediction system after liver transplantation.

To assess the BAR system, a retrospective observational study was performed in 402 patients who had transplant surgery between 1997 and 2012. The BAR score was computed for each patient. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and model calibration. The cutoff value with the best Youden index was selected. Statistical analysis employed the Kaplan-Meier method (log-rank test) for survival, the Mann-Whitney test for group comparison, and multiple logistic regression analysis.

3-month survival was 46% for BAR ≥ 11 and 77% for BAR <11 (p = 0.001); 12-month survival was 44% for BAR ≥ 11 and 69% for BAR <11 (p = 0.001). Factors of survival <3 months were BAR ≥ 11 [odds ratio (OR) 3.08; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.75-5.42; p = 0.001] and intrasurgical use of packed red blood cells (RBC) above 6 units (OR 4.49; 95% CI 2.73-7.39; p = 0.001). For survival <12 months, factors were BAR ≥ 11 (OR 2.94; 95% CI 1.67-5.16; p = 0.001) and RBC >6 units (OR 2.99; 95% CI 1.92-4.64; p = 0.001).

Our study contributes to the incorporation of the BAR system into Brazilian transplantation centers.

Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) dramatically influences graft and patient outcomes. A lack of consensus on an EAD definition hinders comparisons of liver transplant outcomes and management of recipients among and within centers. We sought to develop a model for the quantitative assessment of early allograft function [Model for Early Allograft Function Scoring (MEAF)] after transplantation. A retrospective study including 1026 consecutive liver transplants was performed for MEAF score development. Multivariate data analysis was used to select a small number of postoperative variables that adequately describe EAD. Then, the distribution of these variables was mathematically modeled to assign a score for each actual variable value. A model, based on easily obtainable clinical parameters (ie, alanine aminotransferase, international normalized ratio, and bilirubin) and scoring liver function from 0 to 10, was built. The MEAF score showed a significant association with patient and graft survival at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Hepatic steatosis and age for donors; cold/warm ischemia times and postreperfusion syndrome for surgery; and intensive care unit and hospital stays, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and Child-Pugh scores, body mass index, and fresh frozen plasma transfusions for recipients were factors associated significantly with EAD. The model was satisfactorily validated by its application to an independent set of 200 patients who underwent liver transplantation at a different center. In conclusion, a model for the quantitative assessment of EAD severity has been developed and validated for the first time. The MEAF provides a more accurate graft function assessment than current categorical classifications and may help clinicians to make early enough decisions on retransplantation benefits. Furthermore, the MEAF score is a predictor of recipient and graft survival. The standardization of the criteria used to define EAD may allow reliable comparisons of recipients' treatments and transplant outcomes among and within centers.

The dye indocyanine green is familiar to anaesthetists, and has been studied for more than half a century for cardiovascular and hepatic function monitoring. It is still, however, not yet in routine clinical use in anaesthesia and critical care, at least in Europe. This review is intended to provide a critical analysis of the available evidence concerning the indications for clinical measurement of indocyanine green elimination as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in two areas: its role in peri-operative liver function monitoring during major hepatic resection and liver transplantation; and its role in critically ill patients on the intensive care unit, where it is used for prediction of mortality, and for assessment of the severity of acute liver failure or that of intra-abdominal hypertension. Although numerous studies have demonstrated that indocyanine green elimination measurements in these patient populations can provide diagnostic or prognostic information to the clinician, 'hard' evidence - i.e. high-quality prospective randomised controlled trials - is lacking, and therefore it is not yet time to give a green light for use of indocyanine green in routine clinical practice.

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) causes complications in liver transplantation, which result in poor prognosis. Recipients who develop PGD usually experience a longer intensive care unit and hospital stay and have higher mortality and graft loss rates compared with those without graft dysfunction. However, because of the lack of universally accepted definition, early diagnosis of graft dysfunction is difficult. Additionally, numerous factors affect the allograft function after transplantation, making the prediction of PGD more difficult. The present review was to analyze the literature available on PGD and to propose a definition.

A search of PubMed (up to the end of 2012) for English-language articles relevant to PGD was performed to clarify the characteristics, risk factors, and possible treatments or interventions for PGD.

There is no pathological diagnostic standard; many documented definitions of PGD are different. Many factors, such as donor status, procurement and transplant process and recipient illness may affect the function of graft, and ischemia-reperfusion injury is considered the direct cause. Potential managements which are helpful to improve graft function were investigated. Some of them are promising.

Our analyses suggested that the definition of PGD should include one or more of the following variables: (1) bilirubin ≥ 10 mg/dL on postoperative day 7; (2) international normalized ratio ≥ 1.6 on postoperative day 7; and (3) alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase >2000 IU/L within 7 postoperative days. Reducing risk factors may decrease the incidence of PGD. A majority of the recipients could recover from PGD; however, when the graft progresses into primary non-function, the patients need to be treated with re-transplantation.

In this review, we briefly summarize three fruitful, emerging areas in liver transplantation research, quality of life; risk assessment; and patient safety. Our goal is to highlight recent findings in these areas, with a call for increased integration of social scientists and transplant clinicians to address how best to shape policy and improve outcomes.

After liver transplantation, recipients generally experience clinically significant, sustained improvement in their physical, social and emotional well being. However, a sizeable minority of patients do experience excess morbidity that may benefit from ongoing surveillance and/or intervention. There is growing body of research that describes risks associated with liver transplantation, which can be useful aids to better inform decision making by patients, clinicians, payers, and policy makers. In contrast, there has been a relative lack of empirical data on transplant patient safety vulnerabilities, placing the field of surgery in stark contrast to other high-risk industries, wherein such assessments inform continuous process improvement.

Health services and outcomes research has grown in importance in the liver transplantation literature, but several important questions remain unanswered that merit programmatic, interdisciplinary research.

Ischemia/reperfusion injury is an obstacle especially in steatotic livers, including those with steatosis induced by acute toxic stress. Recently, a modified histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solution, HTK-N, has been developed. This solution contains N-acetylhistidine, amino acids, and iron chelators. This study was designed to test the effects of HTK-N on preservation injury to rat livers after acute toxic injury.

Microvesicular steatosis was induced by a single dose of ethanol (8 g/kg BW). Livers were harvested and stored at 4 °C for 8 h with HTK or HTK-N before transplantation. Tissue and blood samples were taken at 1, 8, and 24 h after reperfusion to compare serum liver enzymes (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and lactate dehydrogenase), standard histology, and immunohistochemistry for myeloperoxidase (MPO), caspase-3, and inducible nitric oxide synthase. Survival was compared after 1 week. For statistics, Analysis of Variance and t test were used.

HTK-N improved survival from 12.5% in HTK to 87.5% (p < 0.05). Furthermore, liver enzymes were decreased to 2-75% of HTK values (p < 0.05). Necrosis and leukocyte infiltration and MPO, caspase-3, and iNOS expression after transplantation were decreased (p < 0.05).

This study demonstrates that HTK-N protects liver grafts with microvesicular steatosis caused by acute toxic injury from cold ischemic injury better than standard HTK most likely via inhibition of hypoxic injury and oxidative stress and amelioration of the inflammatory reaction occurring upon reperfusion.

Initial poor graft function (IPGF) is a major factor influencing the clinical outcome after liver transplantation (LT), but there is no reliable method to assess and predict graft dysfunction. To help clinicians determine prognosis in the early postoperative period, individual parameters and complex scoring systems have been suggested, but most of them are inaccurate because of the multifactorial nature of transplantation courses. Therefore, the aim of our study was to retrospectively evaluate predictive criteria for retransplantation. Forty-two patients were enrolled in this study: 18 who experienced primary non-function (PNF) and 24 with delayed graft function (DGF). All of the patients were treated with the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS). They were into 3 subgroups: patients who survived without LT (n = 20; 47.7%); patients who underwent LT (n = 16; 37%), and patients who died before transplantation (n = 6; 14%). Stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed with the intent to find the risk factors for LT or death after MARS treatment (second analysis). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed on significant variables in the logistic regression model with the intent to individually predict variables for LT or death. After a stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis enrolling all of the previously reported features only 2 variables, tumor necrosis factor (TFN)-α and Glasgow coma score (GCS) score, were statistically significant. TNF-α was an unique independent risk factor for retransplantation or death after MARS treatment (odds ratio [OR] 1.235; P = .013). Conversely, GCS score was protective against retransplantation or death (OR 0.150; P = .003). Starting from these assumptions, a predictive model was created using these 2 variables. On ROC analysis, the combined score showed an area under the curve greater than that of the 2 variables considered separately. Validating these results with a larger number of patients, we considered these 2 factors as subjective parameters to determine outcomes and the difference between PNF and DGF.

While studies in animal models have linked Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 signaling to the pathophysiology of ischemia/reperfusion (IR) injury and liver fibrosis, the relevance of TLR4 activation after human liver transplantation is unknown. The TLR4 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) D299G is situated within the extracellular domain and diminishes receptor binding to danger-associated molecular patterns.

We studied the influence of TLR4 D299G on IR injury and graft survival in 430 deceased donor LT recipients. Compared with livers expressing wild-type (WT) alleles, livers with a TLR4 loss-of-function allele were significantly more likely to have initial good graft function (IGGF) (OR 2.20, p=0.01). In contrast, there was no effect of recipient TLR4 genotype on the rate of IGGF.

The effect of TLR4 D299G on long-term graft survival was analyzed based on hepatitis C virus (HCV) serostatus. In HCV infected recipients, multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between the presence of recipient, but not donor TLR4 D299G and long-term graft failure (HR 2.48, CI 1.28-4.81; p=0.007). There was no difference in graft survival between TLR4 mutant and WT recipients among non-HCV infected recipients.

Collectively, these results demonstrate the differential effects of donor and recipient TLR4 signaling in human liver transplantation. Donor TLR4 contributed to sterile injury following cold preservation and the recipient TLR4 genotype was linked with poor allograft survival among HCV infected recipients.

Previously, decreased organic anion transport through multidrug resistance protein 2 (Mrp2) was observed without any notable cell lysis, even when the livers were stored for 8 hours in University of Wisconsin solution (UW). The aim of this study was to examine the bile flow and its constituents, markers of graft dysfunction without necrosis in cold ischemic livers, using the following preservation media: UW, ET-Kyoto solution (ET-K) and histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (HTK).

Rat livers were stored at 4 degrees C for 8 hours in the preservation media, and reperfused to collect the bile and determine their constituents. Glycyrrhizin (GL) and/or glutathione (GSH) were added to the media as necessary. The transport efficiency of Mrp2 was assessed by the biliary excretion of 5-carboxyfluorescein (CF), a fluoroprobe excreted from Mrp2. The Intracellular distribution of Mrp2 was determined by immunostaining.

Livers stored for 8 hours exhibited significantly decreased bile production and biliary glutathione (GSH) levels without notable cell lysis. CF excretion was significantly delayed in all solutions. However, these markers were remarkably improved by the redistribution of Mrp2 from the cytoplasm to the canalicular membrane, when the livers were exposed to UW in the presence of GL. Moreover, livers exposed to the Kyoto and HTK solutions increased their bile production and organic anion transport in the presence of GL and GSH.

These results suggest that the addition of GL and GSH to preservation solutions improves bile production and biliary organic anion transport by increasing Mrp2 localization to the bile canaliculi in post-cold ischemic livers. (248 words).

Acute liver failure is a potentially devastating clinical syndrome that, without liver transplantation (Tx), is associated with high mortality. Rapid deterioration in clinical status and a shortage of deceased human organs prohibits liver Tx in many patients. Bridging to liver Tx has been attempted by various approaches, for example, bioartificial liver support, extracorporeal pig liver perfusion, and hepatocyte Tx, but none of these approaches has convincingly improved patient survival. The orthotopic Tx of a genetically engineered pig liver could theoretically provide successful bridging. Immediate availability, perfect metabolic condition, adequate size-match and hepatocyte mass, and freedom from potentially pathogenic microorganisms could be assured. The advantages and disadvantages of bridging by pig liver Tx compared with other approaches are discussed. The selection of patients for an initial clinical trial of pig liver Tx would be similar to that of various prior trials in patients experiencing rapid and severe deterioration in liver function. The ability to give truly informed consent for a pig bridging procedure at the time of listing for liver Tx renders the patient with acute-on-chronic liver failure or primary allograft failure is a preferable candidate for this procedure than a patient who is admitted urgently with acute (fulminant) liver failure in whom consent may not be possible. Although several barriers to successful pig organ xenoTx remain, for example, coagulation dysfunction between pig and primate, if these can be resolved by further genetic engineering of the organ-source pigs, a pig liver may prove life saving to patients dying rapidly of liver failure.

The definition of an extended criteria donor for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) remains controversial. The donor risk index (DRI) has become the main tool to define the marginality of hepatic grafts in the United States. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the prognostic ability of DRI among a cohort of Italian patients undergoing OLT.

From December 2006 to March 2008, we prospectively calculated DRI in all consecutive cadaveric grafts. Recipient inclusion criteria were: adult patients with chronic liver disease enlisted for primary OLT. The primary end point was the incidence of primary graft dysfunction (PDF), namely, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >2000 U/mL and prothrombin time <40% on postoperative days 2-7.

We enrolled 74 donor-recipient pairs fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Donor characteristics included DRI 1.7 (range, 0.9-3.0); age 57 years (range, 18-81); ultrasound signs of steatosis in 22 donors (30%); and ischemia time was 536 minutes (range, 290-690). Recipient characteristics are: age 55 years (range, 27-68); hepatocellular carcinoma in 36 subjects (49%); MELD was 16 (range, 7-39); and Child-Pugh score was 8 (range, 6-14). In terms of the primary end points, the DRI did not provide a significant PDF predictor (P = .84). Among all evaluated donor and recipient variables, the following were related to the incidence of graft PDF: donor age (P = .07), ultrasound signs of steatosis (P = .02), donor AST (P = .05), cell saver infusion (P = .07), and warm (P = .04) and cold ischemia (P = .07) times.

The preliminary data of this study showed a poor correlation between DRI and PDF incidence after OLT.

Restoration of blood supply to an organ after a critical period of ischemia results in parenchymal injury and dysfunction of the organ referred to as reperfusion injury. Ischemia reperfusion injury is often seen in organ transplants, major organ resections and in shock. Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) is an adaptational response of briefly ischemic tissues which serves to protect against subsequent prolonged ischemic insults and reperfusion injury. Ischemic preconditioning can be mechanical or pharmacological. Direct mechanical preconditioning in which the target organ is exposed to brief ischemia prior to prolonged ischemia has the benefit of reducing ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) but its main disadvantage is trauma to major vessels and stress to the target organ. Remote (inter organ) preconditioning is a recent observation in which brief ischemia of one organ has been shown to confer protection on distant organs without direct stress to the organ.

To discuss the evidence for remote IPC (RIPC), underlying mechanisms and possible clinical applications of RIPC. METHODS OF SEARCH: A Pubmed search with the keywords "ischemic preconditioning," "remote preconditioning," "remote ischemic preconditioning," and "ischemia reperfusion" was done. All articles on remote preconditioning up to September 2006 have been reviewed. Relevant reference articles from within these have been selected for further discussion.

Experimental studies have demonstrated that the heart, liver, lung, intestine, brain, kidney and limbs are capable of producing remote preconditioning when subjected to brief IR. Remote intra-organ preconditioning was first described in the heart where brief ischemia in one territory led to protection in other areas. Translation of RIPC to clinical application has been demonstrated by the use of brief forearm ischemia in preconditioning the heart prior to coronary bypass and in reducing endothelial dysfunction of the contra lateral limb. Recently protection of the heart has been demonstrated by remote hind limb preconditioning in children who underwent surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass for congenital heart disease. The RIPC stimulus presumably induces release of biochemical messengers which act either by the bloodstream or by the neurogenic pathway resulting in reduced oxidative stress and preservation of mitochondrial function. Studies have demonstrated endothelial NO, Free radicals, Kinases, Opioids, Catecholamines and K(ATP) channels as the candidate mechanism in remote preconditioning. Experiments have shown suppression of proinflammatory genes, expression of antioxidant genes and modulation of gene expression by RIPC as a novel method of IRI injury prevention.

There is strong evidence to support RIPC. The underlying mechanisms and pathways need further clarification. The effective use of RIPC needs to be investigated in clinical settings.

T-cell depletion is an essential aspect of clinical immunosuppression. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of two dosage regimens in this setting. We retrospectively compared 246 patients (group 1) who received a 10-day antithymocyte globulin (ATG) induction protocol with 226 patients (group 2) who received a 3-day protocol. The 6-month rejection rate was 22.3% in group 1 and 12.7% in group 2 (P = 0.03). The sub-analysis showed a higher rejection rate in patients with cholestatic disease (P = 0.01), who were more numerous in group 1. This resulted in an overall difference between the groups. Rates of de novo malignancies and recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma were identical. Viral infection rates were 16% and 18%, respectively (P > 0.5). The rates of bacterial and fungal infection were also similar (37% vs. 42%, P > 0.1). However, infection and ATG administration are independent risk factors for survival. A lower rate of fatal infection was observed in group 2 (P = 0.01), while the 10-day ATG regimen had a detrimental effect on patients who had infection (P < 0.0001). Our results strongly support the application of 3-day ATG induction therapy regimen after orthotopic liver transplantation, as it is associated with the same rejection rate as long-term ATG induction therapy, without the negative survival effect of the latter due to lethal infection.

Despite satisfactory overall results reported, early post-operative period after liver transplantation (LT) still represents a critical time with persistently high rate of graft loss. We retrospectively reviewed our experience of 17 yr in LT, analysing the impact on grafts and patient survivals of the acute complications affecting the graft in the early period following LT. To evaluate the changes that occurred over the years in case of early acute graft failure (EAGF), the study population was divided into three equal groups of 223 patients corresponding to three different periods. Ninety (13.5%) experienced an EAGF. Causes of EAGF were hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) in 32 cases (4.8%), primary graft non-function in 29 cases (4.3%), caval stenosis in 19 (2.8%), early irreversible acute rejection in 6 (0.9%) and portal vein thrombosis in 4 (0.6%). The use of elderly donors and the introduction of the piggyback technique proved to be associated with a higher incidence of HAT and caval stenosis, respectively. Female recipients of male donors were independently associated with Primary graft non-function. Of 90 patients with EAGF, 20 (22.2%) died within the first month after LT, 34 (37.8%) underwent retransplantation (ReLT) and 36 (40%) received conservative treatment. Conservative treatments increased from 3.6% in the first group to 47.0 and 66.8% in the second and third one (p = 0.000). One-year graft and patient survival of patients with EAGF significantly improved over the three eras analysed. The incidence of EAGF remains consistent. Nevertheless, a better understanding of the clinical situations and changes in treatment strategies have led to significant improvements in terms of graft and patient survival rates, now close to the survival rate of EAGF-free patients.

The aim of this cohort study was to assess the cumulative effect of marginal donor criteria on initial graft function and patient survival after liver transplantation.

We included 734 consecutive patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation at the Vienna General Hospital between January 1993 and December 2003. We employed the local registry of the Department of Transplant Surgery, where variables of all patients are routinely and prospectively recorded. Primary outcome was initial graft function, secondary outcome was patient survival.

Cumulative number of marginal donor criteria was significantly and linearly associated with an increased rate of primary dysfunction (PDF; p = 0.005). In patients with more than three cumulative marginal donor criteria the rate of PDF was 36%. Patient survival was not influenced by the cumulative number of donor criteria (log-rank test, p = 0.81). Independent marginal donor criteria to predict PDF were cold ischemia time >10 h [odds ratio (OR) 0.56; 95% CI 0.32-0.98] and donor peak serum sodium >155 mEq/L (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.26-0.77), as assessed in a multivariate regression model.

The use of marginal liver donors with more than three marginal donor criteria shows deleterious effects on initial graft function. Noteworthy, patient survival was not associated with marginal donor criteria, which may be explained by early and successful retransplantation of liver recipients with primary non-function.

Based on experimental work and clinical small studies, histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solution was found to be suitable not only for heart and kidney preservation but also for liver preservation. We decided, therefore, to use this preservation solution for clinical liver preservation in a prospective multi-centre trial. Enrolment to the study was from 1996 to 1999 in four European centres, and the results of 214 patients with HTK-preserved organs were analysed. Analysis showed a primary dysfunction (PDF) rate of 8.8%, with a primary non-function (PNF) rate of 2.3% and initial poor function (IPF) in 6.5%. Patient survival rate at 1 year was 83% and 1-year graft survival rate was 80%. In a univariate and a multivariate analysis PDF, early surgical complications and tendentiously severe infections (septicaemia, pneumonia, cholangitis) were identified as independent risk factors for graft and patient survival. Preservation with HTK can be regarded as an established alternative to preservation with University of Wisconsin (UW) solution when preservation times are short. Definitive assessment of the efficacy of preservation solutions requires further prospective randomised clinical trials that compare HTK and UW.

This paper provides a review of the practice of liver transplantation with the main emphasis on UK practice and indications for transplantation.

This section reviews the process of referral and assessment of patients with liver disease with reference to UK practice.

The practice of brainstem death and cadaveric organ donation is peculiar to individual countries and rates of donation and potential areas of improvement are addressed.

The technical innovations that have led to liver transplantation becoming a semi-elective procedure are reviewed. Specific emphasis is made to the role of liver reduction and splitting and living related liver transplantation and how this impacts on UK practice are reviewed. The complications of liver transplan-tation are also reviewed with reference to our own unit. Immunosuppression:The evolution of immunosuppression and its impact on liver transplantation are reviewed with some reference to future protocols.

The role of retransplantation is reviewed.

The results of liver transplantation are reviewed with specific emphasis on our own experience.

The future of liver transplantation is addressed.

This paper provides a review of the practice of liver transplantation with the main emphasis on UK practice and indications for transplantation.

This section reviews the process of referral and assessment of patients with liver disease with reference to UK practice.

The practice of brainstem death and cadaveric organ donation is peculiar to individual countries and rates of donation and potential areas of improvement are addressed.

The technical innovations that have led to liver transplantation becoming a semi-elective procedure are reviewed. Specific emphasis is made to the role of liver reduction and splitting and living related liver transplantation and how this impacts on UK practice are reviewed. The complications of liver transplan-tation are also reviewed with reference to our own unit. Immunosuppression:The evolution of immunosuppression and its impact on liver transplantation are reviewed with some reference to future protocols.

The role of retransplantation is reviewed.

The results of liver transplantation are reviewed with specific emphasis on our own experience.

The future of liver transplantation is addressed.