HLA class I (HLA-I) molecules present intracellular antigenic peptides to CD8+ T cells during immune surveillance. In donors with type 1 diabetes, hyperexpression of HLA-I occurs in islets with residual insulin-producing β-cells as a hallmark of the disease. HLA-I hyperexpression is frequently detected beyond the islet boundary, forming a "halo." We hypothesized that this halo may reflect the diffusion of soluble forms of HLA-I (sHLA-I) from the islets to the surrounding pancreatic parenchyma. To verify this, we assessed the expression of total, cell surface, and sHLA-I in β-cell lines and isolated human islets after treatment with interferon-α (IFN-α) and IFN-γ. Consistent with the expression patterns of HLA-I in situ, the β-cell lines and cultured human islets dramatically upregulated total and surface HLA-I when exposed to IFNs. Concomitantly, sHLA-I release was significantly increased. HLA-I released within extracellular vesicles and cleaved forms of HLA-I did not significantly contribute to the sHLA-I pool. Rather, IFNs upregulated mRNA splice variants lacking the transmembrane domain. Our findings suggest that β-cells respond to IFNs by upregulating cell-associated and soluble forms of HLA-I. Soluble HLA-I may play a role in modulating islet inflammation during the autoimmune attack.

Hyperexpression of cell-associated HLA class I (HLA-I) induced by interferons is a hallmark feature of the residual insulin-containing pancreatic islets of people with type 1 diabetes. Soluble forms of HLA-I have also been described and are increased in the blood of individuals with viral infections and autoimmune disease, including type 1 diabetes. We assessed whether β-cells release soluble HLA-I (sHLA-I) in response to interferons. We confirm that human β-cells release significant levels of sHLA-I, demonstrate that this increases after interferon exposure, and define the release mechanism. We propose that sHLA-I may affect the activity of infiltrating CD8+ T cells in type 1 diabetes.

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) results from T cell-mediated destruction of pancreatic β-cells, requiring lifelong insulin therapy and glycemic monitoring. While genetic risk, particularly HLA class II, is well established, rising T1D incidence and earlier onset suggest environmental modifiers. Mouse models show that microbiome alterations influence β-cell autoimmunity, and human studies link microbiome composition to T1D, though specific microbial regulators remain unidentified. We examine host-microbiome interactions, including studies implicating enteroviruses in modulating islet autoimmunity. Mechanistic discoveries of microbial effects on diabetes have emerged from mouse model studies. We consider clinical applications, including microbiota-targeted therapies and biomarkers of microbiome-immune crosstalk. Future research should integrate microbial, genetic, environmental, and immune data using multi-omic approaches. Collaborative efforts combining immunology, microbiology, and clinical metadata will drive discovery and precision medicine in T1D.

Earlier studies of pancreases from donors with type 1 diabetes demonstrated enteroviral capsid protein VP1 in beta cells. In the context of a multidisciplinary approach undertaken by the nPOD-Virus group, we assessed VP1 positivity in pancreas and other tissues (spleen, duodenum and pancreatic lymph nodes) from 188 organ donors, including donors with type 1 diabetes and donors expressing autoantibody risk markers. We also investigated whether VP1 positivity is linked to the hyperexpression of HLA class I (HLA-I) molecules in islet cells.

Organ donor tissues were collected by the Network for Pancreatic Organ Donors with Diabetes (nPOD) from donors without diabetes (ND, n=76), donors expressing a single or multiple diabetes-associated autoantibodies (AAb+, n=20; AAb++, n=9) and donors with type 1 diabetes with residual insulin-containing islets (T1D-ICIs, n=41) or only insulin-deficient islets (T1D-IDIs, n=42). VP1 was assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and HLA-I using IHC and immunofluorescence, in two independent laboratories. We determined assay concordance across laboratories and overall occurrence of positive assays, on a case-by-case basis and between donor groups.

Islet cell VP1 positivity was detected in most T1D-ICI donors (77.5%) vs only 38.2% of ND donors (p<0.001). VP1 positivity was associated with HLA-I hyperexpression. Of those donors assessed for HLA-I and VP1, 73.7% had both VP1 immunopositivity and HLA-I hyperexpression (p<0.001 vs ND). Moreover, VP1+ cells were detected at higher frequency in donors with HLA-I hyperexpression (p<0.001 vs normal HLA-I). Among VP1+ donors, the proportion with HLA-I hyperexpression was significantly higher in the AAb++ and T1D-ICI groups (94.9%, p<0.001 vs ND); this was not restricted to individuals with recent-onset diabetes. Critically, for all donor groups combined, HLA-I hyperexpression occurred more frequently in VP1+ compared with VP1- donors (45.8% vs 16%, p<0.001).

We report the most extensive analysis to date of VP1 and HLA-I in pancreases from donors with preclinical and diagnosed type 1 diabetes. We find an association of VP1 with residual beta cells after diagnosis and demonstrate VP1 positivity during the autoantibody-positive preclinical stage. For the first time, we show that VP1 positivity and HLA-I hyperexpression in islet cells are both present during the preclinical stage. While the study of tissues does not allow us to demonstrate causality, our data support the hypothesis that enterovirus infections may occur throughout the natural history of type 1 diabetes and may be one of multiple mechanisms driving islet cell HLA-I hyperexpression.

Previous pathology studies have associated enterovirus infections with type 1 diabetes by examining the enterovirus capsid protein 1 (VP1) in autopsy pancreases obtained near diabetes diagnosis. The Network for Pancreatic Organ Donors with Diabetes (nPOD) has since obtained pancreases from organ donors with type 1 diabetes (with broad age and disease duration) and donors with disease-associated autoantibodies (AAbs), the latter representing preclinical disease. Two accompanying manuscripts from the nPOD-Virus Group report primary data from a coordinated analysis of multiple enterovirus indices. We aimed to comprehensively assess the association of multiple enterovirus markers with type 1 diabetes.

The nPOD-Virus Group examined pancreases from 197 donors, recovered between 2007 and 2019, classified into five groups: donors with type 1 diabetes, with residual insulin-containing islets (T1D-ICI group, n=41) or with only insulin-deficient islets (T1D-IDI, n=42); donors without diabetes who are AAb-negative (ND, n=83); and rare donors without diabetes expressing a single AAb (AAb+, n=22) or multiple AAbs (AAb++, n=9). We assessed the overall association of multiple indicators of enterovirus infection, case-by-case and between donor groups, as well as assay agreement and reproducibility, using various statistical methods. We examined data from 645 assays performed across 197 nPOD donors.

Detection of enterovirus indices by independent laboratories had high reproducibility, using both enterovirus-targeted and unbiased methods. T1D-ICI donors had significantly higher (p<0.001) proportions of positive assay outcomes (58.4%) vs T1D-IDI (10.3%), ND (17.8%) and AAb-positive donors (AAb+ 24.6%; AAb++ 35.0%). Head-to-head comparisons revealed increased proportions of donors positive in two independent assays among T1D-ICI vs ND donors (VP1/HLA class I [HLA-I], p<0.0001; VP1/enterovirus-specific RT-PCR (EV-PCR), p=0.076; EV-PCR/HLA-I, p=0.016; proteomics/HLA-I, p<0.0001; VP1/proteomics, p=0.06). Among 110 donors examined for three markers (VP1, EV-PCR and HLA-I), 83.3% of T1D-ICI donors were positive in two or more assays vs 0% of ND (p<0.001), 26.7% of AAb+ (p=0.006), 28.6% of AAb++ (p=0.023) and 0% of T1D-IDI (p<0.001) donors.

The nPOD-Virus Group conducted, to date, the largest and most comprehensive analysis of multiple indices of pancreatic enterovirus infections in type 1 diabetes; these were more prevalent in T1D-ICI and AAb++ donors than in other groups. Their preferential detection of these indices in donors with residual beta cells and autoimmunity implicates enterovirus infections across disease progression stages and supports a contribution to beta cell loss, directly or indirectly, even after diagnosis. The relatively small number of infected cells and the low amount of viral RNA support the existence of non-acute, low level, possibly persistent enterovirus infections in the pancreas.

The nPOD-Virus group collaboratively applied innovative technologies to detect and sequence viral RNA in pancreas and other tissues from organ donors with type 1 diabetes. These analyses involved the largest number of pancreas samples collected to date. The aim of the current work was to examine the presence of enterovirus RNA in pancreas and lymphoid tissues of organ donors with and without type 1 diabetes.

We analysed pancreas, spleen, pancreatic lymph nodes and duodenum samples from the following groups: (1) donors with type 1 diabetes (n=71) with (n=35) or without (n=36) insulin-containing islets; (2) donors with single or double islet autoantibody positivity without diabetes (n=22); and (3) autoantibody-negative donors without diabetes (control donors) (n=74). Five research laboratories participated in this collaborative effort using approaches for unbiased discovery of RNA viruses (two RNA-Seq platforms), targeted detection of Enterovirus A-D species using RT-PCR, and tests for virus growth in cell culture.

Direct RNA-Seq did not detect virus signal in pancreas samples, whereas RT-PCR detected enterovirus RNA confirmed by sequencing in low amounts in pancreas samples in three of the five donor groups: donors with type 1 diabetes with insulin-containing islets, 16% (5/32) being positive; donors with single islet autoantibody positivity, 53% (8/15) being positive; and non-diabetic donors, 8% (4/49) being positive. Detection of enterovirus RNA was significantly more frequent in single islet autoantibody-positive donors compared with donors with type 1 diabetes with insulin-deficient islets (p<0.001) and control (non-diabetic) donors (p=0.004). In some donors, pancreatic lymph nodes were also positive. RT-PCR detected enterovirus RNA also in the spleen of a small number of donors and virus enrichment in susceptible cell lines before RT-PCR resulted in much higher rate in spleen positivity, particularly in donors with type 1 diabetes. Interestingly, the enterovirus strains detected did not cause a typical lytic infection, possibly reflecting their persistence-prone nature.

This was the largest coordinated effort to examine the presence of enterovirus RNA in the pancreas of organ donors with type 1 diabetes, using a multitude of assays. These findings are consistent with the notion that donors with type 1 diabetes and donors with islet autoantibodies may carry a low-grade enterovirus infection in the pancreas and lymphoid tissues.

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an organ-specific autoimmune disease that results in the selective loss of pancreatic beta cells and an eventual deficit in insulin production to maintain glucose homeostasis. It is now increasingly accepted that this dynamic disease process is multifactorial; involves a variety of immune cells which contribute to an inflamed pancreatic microenvironment; and that the condition is heterogenous, resulting in variable rates of subsequent beta cell damage. In this review, we will explore the current understanding of the cellular interactions between both resident and infiltrating immune cells within the pancreatic environment, highlighting key mechanisms which may promote the beta cell destruction and islet damage associated with T1D.

After a century of extensive scientific investigations, there is still no curative or disease-modifying treatment available that can provide long-lasting remission for patients diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Although T1D has historically been regarded as a classic autoimmune disorder targeting and destroying pancreatic islet β-cells, significant research has recently demonstrated that β-cells themselves also play a substantial role in the disease's progression, which could explain some of the unfavorable clinical outcomes. We offer a thorough review of scientific and clinical insights pertaining to molecular mechanisms behind pathogenesis and the different therapeutic interventions in T1D covering over 20 possible pharmaceutical intervention treatments. The interventions are categorized as immune therapies, treatments targeting islet endocrine dysfunctions, medications with dual modes of action in immune and islet endocrine cells, and combination treatments with a broader spectrum of activity. We suggest that these collective findings can provide a valuable platform to discover new combinatorial synergies in search of the curative disease-modifying intervention for T1D. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This research delves into the underlying causes of T1D and identifies critical mechanisms governing β-cell function in both healthy and diseased states. Thus, we identify specific pathways that could be manipulated by existing or new pharmacological interventions. These interventions fall into several categories: (1) immunomodifying therapies individually targeting immune cell processes, (2) interventions targeting β-cells, (3) compounds that act simultaneously on both immune cell and β-cell pathways, and (4) combinations of compounds simultaneously targeting immune and β-cell pathways.

Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) is caused by a combination of genetic and environmental factors that trigger autoimmune-mediated destruction of pancreatic β-cells. Defects in β-cell stress response pathways such as autophagy may play an important role in activating and/or exacerbating the immune response in disease development. Previously, we discovered that β-cell autophagy is impaired prior to the onset of T1D, implicating this pathway in T1D pathogenesis.

To assess the role of autophagy in β-cell health and survival, and whether defects in autophagy render islets more immunogenic.

We knocked out the critical autophagy enzyme, ATG7, in the β-cells of mice (ATG7Δβ-cell) then monitored blood glucose, performed glucose tolerance tests, and evaluated bulk islet mRNA and protein. We also assessed MHC-I expression and presence of CD45+ immune cells in ATG7Δβ-cell islets and evaluated how impaired autophagy affects EndoC-βH1 HLA-I expression under basal and IFNα stimulated conditions. Lastly, we co-cultured ATG7Δβ-cell islet cells with diabetogenic BDC2.5 helper T cells and evaluated T cell activation.

We found that all ATG7Δβ-cell mice developed diabetes between 11-15 weeks of age. Gene ontology analysis revealed a significant upregulation of pathways involved in inflammatory processes, response to ER stress, and the ER-associated degradation pathway. Interestingly, we also observed upregulation of proteins involved in MHC-I presentation, suggesting that defective β-cell autophagy may alter the immunopeptidome, or antigen repertoire, and enhance β-cell immune visibility. In support of this hypothesis, we observed increased MHC-I expression and CD45+ immune cells in ATG7Δβ-cell islets. We also demonstrate that HLA-I is upregulated in EndoC β-cells when autophagic degradation is inhibited. This effect was observed under both basal and IFNα stimulated conditions. Conversely, a stimulator of lysosome acidification/function, C381, decreased HLA-I expression. Lastly, we showed that in the presence of islet cells with defective autophagy, there is enhanced BDC2.5 T cell activation.

Our findings demonstrate that β-cell autophagy is critical to cell survival/function. Defective β-cell autophagy induces ER stress, alters pathways of antigen production, and enhances MHC-I/HLA-I presentation to surveilling immune cells. Overall, our results suggest that defects in autophagy make β-cells more susceptible to immune attack and destruction.

The nPOD-Virus group collaboratively applied innovative technologies to detect and sequence viral RNA in pancreas and other tissues from organ donors with type 1 diabetes. These analyses involved the largest number of pancreas samples collected to date.

We analysed pancreas, spleen, pancreatic lymph nodes, and duodenum samples from the following donor groups: a) donors with type 1 diabetes (n=71), with (n=35) or without (n=36) insulin-containing islets, (b) donors with single or double islet autoantibody positivity without diabetes (n=22) and c) autoantibody-negative donors without diabetes (control donors) (n=74). Five research laboratories participated in this collaborative effort using approaches for unbiased discovery of RNA viruses (two RNA-Seq platforms), targeted detection of Enterovirus A-D species using RT-PCR, and tests for virus growth in cell-culture.

Direct RNA-Seq did not detect virus signal in pancreas samples, whereas RT-PCR detected enterovirus RNA confirmed by sequencing in low amounts in pancreas samples in three of the five donor groups, namely donors with type 1 diabetes with insulin-containing islets, 16% (5/32) donors being positive, donors with single islet autoantibody positivity with 53% (8/15) donors being positive, and non-diabetic donors with 8% (4/49) being enterovirus RNA positive. Detection of enterovirus RNA was significantly more frequent in single islet autoantibody-positive donors compared to donors with type 1 diabetes with insulin-deficient islets (p-value <0.001) and control donors (p-value 0.004). In some donors, pancreatic lymph nodes were also positive. RT-PCR detected enterovirus RNA also in spleen of a small number of donors and virus enrichment in susceptible cell lines before RT-PCR resulted in much higher rate in spleen positivity, particularly in donors with type 1 diabetes. Interestingly, the enterovirus strains detected did not cause a typical lytic infection, possibly reflecting their persistence-prone nature.

This was the largest coordinated effort to examine the presence of enterovirus RNA in pancreas of organ donors with type 1 diabetes, using a multitude of assays. These findings are consistent with the notion that both the subjects with type 1 diabetes and those with islet autoantibodies may carry a low-grade enterovirus infection in the pancreas and lymphoid tissues.

Coxsackievirus B (CVB) infection has long been considered an environmental factor precipitating Type 1 diabetes (T1D), an autoimmune disease marked by loss of insulin-producing β cells within pancreatic islets. Previous studies have shown CVB infection negatively impacts islet function and viability but do not report on how virus infection individually affects the multiple cell types present in human primary islets. Therefore, we hypothesized that the various islet cell populations have unique transcriptional responses to CVB infection. Here, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing on human cadaveric islets treated with either CVB or poly(I:C), a viral mimic, for 24 and 48 hours. Our global analysis reveals CVB differentially induces dynamic transcriptional changes associated with multiple cell processes and functions over time whereas poly(I:C) promotes an immune response that progressively increases with treatment duration. At the single-cell resolution, we find CVB infects all islet cell types at similar rates yet induces unique cell-type specific transcriptional responses with β, α, and ductal cells having the strongest response. Sequencing and functional data suggest that CVB negatively impacts mitochondrial respiration and morphology in distinct ways in β and α cells, while also promoting the generation of reactive oxygen species. We also observe an increase in the expression of the long-noncoding RNA MIR7-3HG in β cells with high viral titers and reveal its knockdown reduces gene expression of viral proteins as well as apoptosis in stem cell-derived islets. Together, these findings demonstrate a cell-specific transcriptional, temporal, and functional response to CVB infection and provide new insights into the relationship between CVB infection and T1D.

Diabetes mellitus is one of the world's most prevalent and complex metabolic disorders, and it is a rapidly growing global public health issue. It is characterized by hyperglycemia, a condition involving a high blood glucose level brought on by deficiencies in insulin secretion, decreased activity of insulin, or both. Prolonged effects of diabetes include cardiovascular problems, retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy, and vascular alterations in both macro- and micro-blood vessels. In vivo and in vitro models have always been important for investigating and characterizing disease pathogenesis, identifying targets, and reviewing novel treatment options and medications. Fully understanding these models is crucial for the researchers so this review summarizes the different experimental in vivo and in vitro model options used to study diabetes and its consequences. The most popular in vivo studies involves the small animal models, such as rodent models, chemically induced diabetogens like streptozotocin and alloxan, and the possibility of deleting or overexpressing a specific gene by knockout and transgenic technologies on these animals. Other models include virally induced models, diet/nutrition induced diabetic animals, surgically induced models or pancreatectomy models, and non-obese models. Large animals or non-rodent models like porcine (pig), canine (dog), nonhuman primate, and Zebrafish models are also outlined. The in vitro models discussed are murine and human beta-cell lines and pancreatic islets, human stem cells, and organoid cultures. The other enzymatic in vitro tests to assess diabetes include assay of amylase inhibition and inhibition of α-glucosidase activity.

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic condition in which beta cells are destroyed by immune cells. Despite progress in immunotherapies that could delay T1D onset, early detection of autoimmunity remains challenging. Here, we evaluate the utility of machine learning for early prediction of T1D using single-cell analysis of islets. Using gradient-boosting algorithms, we model changes in gene expression of single cells from pancreatic tissues in T1D and non-diabetic organ donors. We assess if mathematical modeling could predict the likelihood of T1D development in non-diabetic autoantibody-positive donors. While most autoantibody-positive donors are predicted to be non-diabetic, select donors with unique gene signatures are classified as T1D. Our strategy also reveals a shared gene signature in distinct T1D-associated models across cell types, suggesting a common effect of the disease on transcriptional outputs of these cells. Our study establishes a precedent for using machine learning in early detection of T1D.

Infection with coxsackie B viruses (CVBs) can cause diseases ranging from mild common cold-type symptoms to severe life-threatening conditions. CVB infections are considered to be prime candidates for environmental triggers of type 1 diabetes. This, together with the significant disease burden of acute CVB infections and their association with chronic diseases other than diabetes, has prompted the development of human CVB vaccines. The current study evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of the first human vaccine designed against CVBs associated with type 1 diabetes in a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled Phase I trial.

The main eligibility criteria for participants were good general health, age between 18 and 45 years, provision of written informed consent and willingness to comply with all trial procedures. Treatment allocation (PRV-101 or placebo) was based on a computer-generated randomisation schedule and people assessing the outcomes were masked to group assignment. In total, 32 participants (17 men, 15 women) aged 18-44 years were randomised to receive a low (n=12) or high (n=12) dose of a multivalent, formalin-inactivated vaccine including CVB serotypes 1-5 (PRV-101), or placebo (n=8), given by intramuscular injections at weeks 0, 4 and 8 at a single study site in Finland. The participants were followed for another 24 weeks. Safety and tolerability were the primary endpoints. Anti-CVB IgG and virus-neutralising titres were analysed using an ELISA and neutralising plaque reduction assays, respectively.

Among the 32 participants (low dose, n=12; high dose, n=12; placebo, n=8) no serious adverse events or adverse events leading to study treatment discontinuation were observed. Treatment-emergent adverse events considered to be related to the study drug occurred in 37.5% of the participants in the placebo group and 62.5% in the PRV-101 group (injection site pain, headache, injection site discomfort and injection site pruritus being most common). PRV-101 induced dose-dependent neutralising antibody responses against all five CVB serotypes included in the vaccine in both the high- and low-dose groups. Protective titres ≥8 against all five serotypes were seen in >90% of participants over the entire follow-up period.

The results indicate that the tested multivalent CVB vaccine is well tolerated and immunogenic, supporting its further clinical development.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04690426.

This trial was funded by Provention Bio, a Sanofi company.

To investigate gastrointestinal infection episodes (GIEs) in relation to the appearance of islet autoantibodies in The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) cohort.

GIEs on risk of autoantibodies against either insulin (IAA) or GAD (GADA) as the first-appearing autoantibody were assessed in a 10-year follow-up of 7,867 children. Stool virome was characterized in a nested case-control study.

GIE reports (odds ratio [OR] 2.17 [95% CI 1.39-3.39]) as well as Norwalk viruses found in stool (OR 5.69 [1.36-23.7]) at <1 year of age were associated with an increased IAA risk at 2-4 years of age. GIEs reported at age 1 to <2 years correlated with a lower risk of IAA up to 10 years of age (OR 0.48 [0.35-0.68]). GIE reports at any other age were associated with an increase in IAA risk (OR 2.04 for IAA when GIE was observed 12-23 months prior [1.41-2.96]). Impacts on GADA risk were limited to GIEs <6 months prior to autoantibody development in children <4 years of age (OR 2.16 [1.54-3.02]).

Bidirectional associations were observed. GIEs were associated with increased IAA risk when reported before 1 year of age or 12-23 months prior to IAA. Norwalk virus was identified as one possible candidate factor. GIEs reported during the 2nd year of life were associated with a decreased IAA risk.

For more than a century, enteroviral infections have been associated with autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes (T1D). Uncontrolled viral response pathways repeatedly presented during childhood highly correlate with autoimmunity and T1D. Virus responses evoke chemokines and cytokines, the "cytokine storm" circulating through the body and attack cells especially vulnerable to inflammatory destruction. Intra-islet inflammation is a major trigger of β-cell failure in both T1D and T2D. The genetic contribution of islet inflammation pathways is apparent in T1D, with several mutations in the interferon system. In contrast, in T2D, gene mutations are related to glucose homeostasis in β cells and insulin-target tissue and rarely within viral response pathways. Therefore, the current study evaluated whether enteroviral RNA can be found in the pancreas from organ donors with T2D and its association with disease progression.

Pancreases from well-characterized 29 organ donors with T2D and 15 age- and BMI-matched controls were obtained from the network for pancreatic organ donors with diabetes and were analyzed in duplicates. Single-molecule fluorescence in-situ hybridization analyses were performed using three probe sets to detect positive-strand enteroviral RNA; pancreas sections were co-stained by classical immunostaining for insulin and CD45.

There was no difference in the presence or localization of enteroviral RNA in control nondiabetic and T2D pancreases; viral infiltration showed large heterogeneity in both groups ranging from 0 to 94 virus+ cells scattered throughout the pancreas, most of them in the exocrine pancreas. Very rarely, a single virus+ cell was found within islets or co-stained with CD45+ immune cells. Only one single T2D donor presented an exceptionally high number of viruses, similarly as seen previously in T1D, which correlated with a highly reduced number of β cells.

No association of enteroviral infection in the pancreas and T2D diabetes could be found. Despite great similarities in inflammatory markers in islets in T1D and T2D, long-term enteroviral infiltration is a distinct pathological feature of T1D-associated autoimmunity and in T1D pancreases.

The hyperexpression of human leukocyte antigen class I (HLA-I) molecules on pancreatic beta-cells is widely accepted as a hallmark feature of type 1 diabetes pathogenesis. This response is important clinically since it may increase the visibility of beta-cells to autoreactive CD8+ T-cells, thereby accelerating disease progression. In this review, key factors which drive HLA-I hyperexpression will be explored, and their clinical significance examined. It is established that the presence of residual beta-cells is essential for HLA-I hyperexpression by islet cells at all stages of the disease. We suggest that the most likely drivers of this process are interferons released from beta-cells (type I or III interferon; possibly in response to viral infection) or those elaborated from influent, autoreactive immune cells (type II interferon). In both cases, Janus Kinase/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (JAK/STAT) pathways will be activated to induce the downstream expression of interferon stimulated genes. A variety of models have highlighted that HLA-I expression is enhanced in beta-cells in response to interferons, and that STAT1, STAT2 and interferon regulatory factor 9 (IRF9) play key roles in mediating these effects (depending on the species of interferon involved). Importantly, STAT1 expression is elevated in the beta-cells of donors with recent-onset type I diabetes, and this correlates with HLA-I hyperexpression on an islet-by-islet basis. These responses can be replicated in vitro, and we consider that chronically elevated STAT1 may have a role in maintaining HLA-I hyperexpression. However, other data have highlighted that STAT2-IRF9 may also be critical to this process. Thus, a better understanding of how these factors regulate HLA-I under chronically stimulated conditions needs to be gathered. Finally, JAK inhibitors can target interferon signaling pathways to diminish HLA-I expression in mouse models. It seems probable that these agents may also be effective in patients; diminishing HLA-I hyperexpression on islets, reducing the visibility of beta-cells to the immune system and ultimately slowing disease progression. The first clinical trials of selective JAK inhibitors are underway, and the outcomes should have important implications for type 1 diabetes clinical management.

Type 1 diabetes is around twice as common in the offspring of men with type 1 diabetes than in the offspring of women with type 1 diabetes, but the reasons for this difference are unclear. This Review summarises the evidence on the rate of transmission of type 1 diabetes to the offspring of affected fathers compared with affected mothers. The findings of nine major studies are presented, describing the magnitude of the effect observed and the relative strengths and weaknesses of these studies. This Review also explores possible underlying mechanisms for this effect, such as genetic mechanisms (eg, the selective loss of fetuses with high-risk genes in mothers with type 1 diabetes, preferential transmission of susceptibility genes from fathers, and parent-of-origin effects influencing gene expression), environmental exposures (eg, exposure to maternal hyperglycaemia, exogenous insulin exposure, and transplacental antibody transfer), and maternal microchimerism. Understanding why type 1 diabetes is more common in the offspring of men versus women with type 1 diabetes will help in the identification of individuals at high risk of the disease and can pave the way in the development of interventions that mimic the protective elements of maternal type 1 diabetes to reduce the risk of disease in individuals at high risk.

Enteroviruses are routinely detected with molecular methods within large cohorts that are at risk of type 1 diabetes. We aimed to examine the association between enteroviruses and either islet autoimmunity or type 1 diabetes.

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed and Embase for controlled observational studies from inception until Jan 1, 2023. Cohort or case-control studies were eligible if enterovirus RNA or protein were detected in individuals with outcomes of islet autoimmunity or type 1 diabetes. Studies in pregnancy or other types of diabetes were excluded. Data extraction and appraisal involved author contact and deduplication, which was done independently by three reviewers. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and National Health and Medical Research Council levels of evidence. Pooled and subgroup meta-analyses were done in RevMan version 5.4, with random effects models and Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios (ORs; 95% CIs). The study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021278863.

The search returned 3266 publications, with 897 full texts screened. Following deduplication, 113 eligible records corresponded to 60 studies (40 type 1 diabetes; nine islet autoimmunity; 11 both), comprising 12077 participants (5981 cases; 6096 controls). Study design and quality varied, generating substantial statistical heterogeneity. Meta-analysis of 56 studies showed associations between enteroviruses and islet autoimmunity (OR 2·1, 95% CI 1·3-3·3; p=0·002; n=18; heterogeneity χ²/df 2·69; p=0·0004; I²=63%), type 1 diabetes (OR 8·0, 95% CI 4·9-13·0; p<0·0001; n=48; χ²/df 6·75; p<0·0001; I²=85%), or within 1 month of type 1 diabetes (OR 16·2, 95% CI 8·6-30·5; p<0·0001; n=28; χ²/df 3·25; p<0·0001; I²=69%). Detection of either multiple or consecutive enteroviruses was associated with islet autoimmunity (OR 2·0, 95% CI 1·0-4·0; p=0·050; n=8). Detection of Enterovirus B was associated with type 1 diabetes (OR 12·7, 95% CI 4·1-39·1; p<0·0001; n=15).

These findings highlight the association between enteroviruses and islet autoimmunity or type 1 diabetes. Our data strengthen the rationale for vaccine development targeting diabetogenic enterovirus types, particularly those within Enterovirus B. Prospective studies of early life are needed to elucidate the role of enterovirus timing, type, and infection duration on the initiation of islet autoimmunity and the progression to type 1 diabetes.

Environmental Determinants of Islet Autoimmunity, European Association for the Study of Diabetes, JDRF, Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, and University of New South Wales.

In slowly progressive type 1 diabetes mellitus (SPIDDM), the pancreas shows sustained islet inflammation, pancreatitis, pancreatic acinar cell metaplasia/dysplasia (ADM), and intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN), a precancerous lesion. The mechanisms underlying these changes remain unclear. The presence of enterovirus (EV) encoded-capsid protein 1 (VP1) and -2A protease (2A^pro) and the innate immune responses of the pancreas were studied using immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization in 12 SPIDDM and 19 non-diabetic control pancreases. VP1, 2A^pro, and EV-RNA were detected in islets and the exocrine pancreas in all SPIDDM pancreases. Innate immune receptor, melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5), and interferon (IFN)-beta1 were intensified in the islets of SPIDDM patients with short disease duration. However, expressions of MDA5 and IFN-beta1were suppressed in those with longer disease duration. CD3⁺ T cell infiltration was observed in the VP1- and insulin-positive islets (insulitis) and exocrine acinar cells. CD11c⁺ dendritic cells (DCs) in islets were scarce in long-term SPIDDM. This study showed the consistent presence of EV, suggesting an association with inflammatory changes in the endocrine and exocrine pancreas in SPIDDM. Suppressed expressions of MDA5 and IFN-beta1, as well as decreased numbers of DCs in the host cells, may contribute to persistent EV infection and induction of ADM/PanIN lesions, which may potentially provide a scaffold for pancreatic neoplasms.

Evidence suggests that psychological and physical stress are relevant triggering factors for the onset of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). The underlying mechanisms involve a complex neuroendocrine structure, involving the central nervous system and the periphery. Psychological stress leads to an increase of serum glucocorticoid concentrations and catecholamines release increasing the insulin need and the insulin resistance. According to the β-cell stress hypothesis, also causes of increased insulin demand, such as rapid growth, overweight, puberty, low physical activity, trauma, infections, and glucose overload, are potentially relevant factors in development of T1D. It has also been demonstrated that chronic stress and obesity form a vicious circle which leads to a definitive metabolic failure, increasing the risk of developing T2D. In this review, we will provide the most recent data concerning the role of stress in the outcomes of T1D and T2D, with a focus on the role of physical and psychological stress on the onset of T1D.

Viral infections have been frequently associated with physiological and pathological changes in the endocrine system for many years. The numerous early and late endocrine complications reported during the current pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) reinforce the relevance of improving our understanding of the impact of viral infections on the endocrine system. Several viruses have been shown to infect endocrine cells and induce endocrine system disturbances through the direct damage of these cells or through indirect mechanisms, especially the activation of the host antiviral immune response, which may lead to the development of local or systemic inflammation or organ-specific autoimmunity. In addition, endocrine disorders may also affect susceptibility to viral infections since endocrine hormones have immunoregulatory functions. This review provides a brief overview of the impact of viral infections on the human endocrine system in order to provide new avenues for the control of endocrine diseases.

The devastating global pandemic Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19) isolated in China in January 2020 is responsible for an outbreak of pneumonia and other multisystemic complications. The clinical picture of the infection has extreme variability: it goes from asymptomatic patients or mild forms with fever, cough, fatigue and loss of smell and taste to severe cases ending up in the intensive care unit (ICU). This is due to a possible cytokine storm that may lead to multiorgan failure, septic shock, or thrombosis. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV -2), which is the virus that causes COVID 19, binds to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors, which are expressed in key metabolic organs and tissues, including pancreatic beta cells, adipose tissue, the small intestine and the kidneys. Therefore it is possible to state that newly-onset diabetes is triggered by COVID 19 infection. Although many hypotheses have clarified the potential diabetogenic effect of COVID 19, a few observations were reported during this pandemic. Two male patients admitted to us with devastating hyperglycemia symptoms were diagnosed with type 1/autoimmune diabetes mellitus within 3 months following COVID 19 infection. Autoantibodies and decreased C peptide levels were detected in these patients. We speculated that several mechanisms might trigger autoimmune insulitis and pancreatic beta-cell destruction by COVID 19 infection. We aim to raise awareness of the possible link between SARS-CoV-2 and newly onset type 1 diabetes mellitus. Further studies are needed to determine a more definitive link between the two clinical entities.

Enteroviral infection has been implicated consistently as a key environmental factor correlating with the appearance of autoimmunity and/or the presence of overt type 1 diabetes, in which pancreatic insulin-producing beta cells are destroyed by an autoimmune response. Genetic predisposition through variation in the type 1 diabetes risk gene IFIH1 (interferon induced with helicase C domain 1), which encodes the viral pattern-recognition receptor melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5), supports a potential link between enterovirus infection and type 1 diabetes.

We used molecular techniques to detect enterovirus RNA in peripheral blood samples (in separated cellular compartments or plasma) from two cohorts comprising 79 children or 72 adults that include individuals with and without type 1 diabetes who had multiple autoantibodies. We also used immunohistochemistry to detect the enteroviral protein VP1 in the pancreatic islets of post-mortem donors (n=43) with type 1 diabetes.

We observed enhanced detection sensitivity when sampling the cellular compartment compared with the non-cellular compartment of peripheral blood (OR 21.69; 95% CI 3.64, 229.20; p<0.0001). In addition, we show that children with autoimmunity are more likely to test positive for enterovirus RNA than those without autoimmunity (OR 11.60; 95% CI 1.89, 126.90; p=0.0065). Furthermore, we found that individuals carrying the predisposing allele (946Thr) of the common variant in IFIH1 (rs1990760, Thr946Ala) are more likely to test positive for enterovirus in peripheral blood (OR 3.07; 95% CI 1.02, 8.58; p=0.045). In contrast, using immunohistochemistry, there was no correlation between the common variant in IFIH1 and detection of enteroviral VP1 protein in the pancreatic islets of donors with type 1 diabetes.

Our data indicate that, in peripheral blood, antigen-presenting cells are the predominant source of enterovirus infection, and that infection is correlated with disease stage and genetic predisposition, thereby supporting a role for enterovirus infection prior to disease onset.

Adult-onset autoimmune (AOA) diabetes pathophysiology starts with immune changes, followed by dysglycaemia and overt disease. AOA diabetes can occur as classic type 1 diabetes when associated with severe loss of insulin secretion. More frequently, it is diagnosed as latent autoimmune diabetes in adults, a slowly progressing form with late onset, a long period not requiring insulin, and it is often misdiagnosed as type 2 diabetes. As its clinical presentation varies remarkably and immune markers often lack specificity, it is challenging to classify each case ad hoc, especially when insulin treatment is not required at diagnosis. Proper care of AOA diabetes aims to prevent complications and to improve quality of life and life expectancy. To achieve these goals, attention should be paid to lifestyle factors, with the aid of pharmacological therapies properly tailored to each individual clinical setting. Given the heterogeneity of the disease, choosing the right therapy for AOA diabetes is challenging. Most of the trials testing disease-modifying therapies for autoimmune diabetes are conducted in people with childhood onset, whereas non-insulin diabetes therapies have mostly been studied in the larger population with type 2 diabetes. More randomized controlled trials of therapeutic agents in AOA diabetes are needed.

Enteroviruses are believed to trigger or accelerate islet autoimmunity in genetically susceptible individuals, thereby resulting in loss of functional insulin-producing β-cells and type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Although enteroviruses are primarily involved in acute and lytic infections in vitro and in vivo, they can also establish a persistent infection. Prospective epidemiological studies have strongly associated the persistence of enteroviruses, especially coxsackievirus B (CVB), with the appearance of islet autoantibodies and an increased risk of T1DM. CVB can persist in pancreatic ductal and β-cells, which leads to structural or functional alterations of these cells, and to a chronic inflammatory response that promotes recruitment and activation of pre-existing autoreactive T cells and β-cell autoimmune destruction. CVB persistence in other sites, such as the intestine, blood cells and thymus, has been described; these sites could serve as a reservoir for infection or reinfection of the pancreas, and this persistence could have a role in the disturbance of tolerance to β-cells. This Review addresses the involvement of persistent enterovirus infection in triggering islet autoimmunity and T1DM, as well as current strategies to control enterovirus infections for preventing or reducing the risk of T1DM onset.

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by insulin deficiency and resultant hyperglycemia. Complex interactions of genetic and environmental factors trigger the onset of autoimmune mechanisms responsible for development of autoimmunity to β cell antigens and subsequent development of T1D. A potential role of virus infections has long been hypothesized, and growing evidence continues to implicate enteroviruses as the most probable triggering viruses. Recent studies have strengthened the association between enteroviruses and development of autoimmunity in T1D patients, potentially through persistent infections. Enterovirus infections may contribute to different stages of disease development. We review data from both human cohort studies and experimental research exploring the potential roles and molecular mechanisms by which enterovirus infections can impact disease outcome.

Enteroviruses, particularly the group B coxsackieviruses (CVBs), have been associated with the development of type 1 diabetes. Several CVB serotypes establish chronic infections in human cells in vivo and in vitro. However, the mechanisms leading to enterovirus persistency and, possibly, beta cell autoimmunity are not fully understood. We established a carrier-state-type persistent infection model in human pancreatic cell line PANC-1 using two distinct CVB1 strains and profiled the infection-induced changes in cellular transcriptome. In the current study, we observed clear changes in the gene expression of factors associated with the pancreatic microenvironment, the secretory pathway, and lysosomal biogenesis during persistent CVB1 infections. Moreover, we found that the antiviral response pathways were activated differently by the two CVB1 strains. Overall, our study reveals extensive transcriptional responses in persistently CVB1-infected pancreatic cells with strong opposite but also common changes between the two strains.

Beta-cell destruction in type 1 diabetes (T1D) results from the combined effect of inflammation and recurrent autoimmunity. Accumulating evidence suggests the engagement of cellular stress during the initial stage of the disease, preceding destruction and triggering immune cell infiltration. While the role of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in this process has been largely described, the participation of the other cellular organelles, particularly the mitochondria which are central mediator for beta-cell survival and function, remains poorly investigated. Here, we have explored the contribution of ER stress, in activating type-I interferon signaling and innate immune cell recruitment. Using human beta-cell line EndoC-βH1 exposed to thapsigargin, we demonstrate that induction of cellular stress correlates with mitochondria dysfunction and a significant accumulation of cytosolic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) that triggers neutrophils migration by an IL8-dependent mechanism. These results provide a novel mechanistic insight on how ER stress can cause insulitis and may ultimately facilitate the identification of potential targets to protect beta-cells against immune infiltration.

Although type 1 diabetes (T1D) is primarily a disease of the pancreatic beta-cells, understanding of the disease-associated alterations in the whole pancreas could be important for the improved treatment or the prevention of the disease. We have characterized the whole-pancreas gene expression of patients with recently diagnosed T1D from the Diabetes Virus Detection (DiViD) study and non-diabetic controls. Furthermore, another parallel dataset of the whole pancreas and an additional dataset from the laser-captured pancreatic islets of the DiViD patients and non-diabetic organ donors were analyzed together with the original dataset to confirm the results and to get further insights into the potential disease-associated differences between the exocrine and the endocrine pancreas. First, higher expression of the core acinar cell genes, encoding for digestive enzymes, was detected in the whole pancreas of the DiViD patients when compared to non-diabetic controls. Second, In the pancreatic islets, upregulation of immune and inflammation related genes was observed in the DiViD patients when compared to non-diabetic controls, in line with earlier publications, while an opposite trend was observed for several immune and inflammation related genes at the whole pancreas tissue level. Third, strong downregulation of the regenerating gene family (REG) genes, linked to pancreatic islet growth and regeneration, was observed in the exocrine acinar cell dominated whole-pancreas data of the DiViD patients when compared with the non-diabetic controls. Fourth, analysis of unique features in the transcriptomes of each DiViD patient compared with the other DiViD patients, revealed elevated expression of central antiviral immune response genes in the whole-pancreas samples, but not in the pancreatic islets, of one DiViD patient. This difference in the extent of antiviral gene expression suggests different statuses of infection in the pancreas at the time of sampling between the DiViD patients, who were all enterovirus VP1+ in the islets by immunohistochemistry based on earlier studies. The observed features, indicating differences in the function, status and interplay between the exocrine and the endocrine pancreas of recent onset T1D patients, highlight the importance of studying both compartments for better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of T1D.

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic autoimmune disease in which pancreatic islet β cells are destroyed by immune cells, ultimately leading to overt diabetes. The progressive increase in T1D incidence over the years points to the role of environmental factors in triggering or accelerating the disease process which develops on a highly multigenic susceptibility background. Evidence that environmental factors induce T1D has mostly been obtained in animal models. In the human, associations between viruses, dietary habits or changes in the microbiota and the development of islet cell autoantibodies or overt diabetes have been reported. So far, prediction of T1D development is mostly based on autoantibody detection. Future work should focus on identifying a causality between the different environmental risk factors and T1D development to improve prediction scores. This should allow developing preventive strategies to limit the T1D burden in the future.

The Diabetes Virus Detection (DiViD) study is the first study to laparoscopically collect pancreatic tissue and purified pancreatic islets together with duodenal mucosa, serum, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and stools from six live adult patients (age 24-35 years) with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes. The presence of enterovirus (EV) in the pancreatic islets of these patients has previously been reported.

In the present study we used reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) and sequencing to characterise EV genomes present in different tissues to understand the nature of infection in these individuals.

All six patients were found to be EV-positive by RT-qPCR in at least one of the tested sample types. Four patients were EV-positive in purified islet culture medium, three in PBMCs, one in duodenal biopsy and two in stool, while serum was EV-negative in all individuals. Sequencing the 5' untranslated region of these EVs suggested that all but one belonged to enterovirus B species. One patient was EV-positive in all these sample types except for serum. Sequence analysis revealed that the virus strain present in the isolated islets of this patient was different from the strain found in other sample types. None of the islet-resident viruses could be isolated using EV-permissive cell lines.

EV RNA can be frequently detected in various tissues of patients with type 1 diabetes. At least in some patients, the EV strain in the pancreatic islets may represent a slowly replicating persisting virus.