Hepatic malignancies in explanted livers are not uncommon; however, finding primary nonhepatic malignancies in explanted livers of any etiology is very rare. Given its rarity, we present a case of low-grade B-cell lymphoma in the liver explant of a patient with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis cirrhosis after orthotopic liver transplantation. Preorthotopic liver transplantation workup was notable for periportal lymphadenopathy that was negative for malignancy per ultrasound-guided biopsy, so this finding was surprising. This unexpected diagnosis of lymphoma despite negative workup during pretransplant evaluation underscores the importance for liver transplant centers to conduct thorough investigations for malignancies before transplantation.

The diagnostic value of liver biopsy has been confirmed in patients with abnormal liver test results; however, little data are available on its application in patients with portal hypertension. This study aimed to investigate the utility of liver biopsy for the etiological diagnosis of unexplained portal hypertension, and explore the clinical and pathological characteristics of each etiology. A retrospective observational analysis was conducted on 1367 patients who underwent liver biopsy at the Second Hospital of Nanjing from 2017 to 2019. Of these, 188 patients with unexplained portal hypertension were enrolled. The clinical and pathological characteristics were collected and reassessed in a multidisciplinary team meeting. Among these patients, 174 (92.6%, 174/188) had a definite etiological diagnosis through liver biopsy. The main etiologies were autoimmune hepatitis in 47 patients (25%, 47/188), autoimmune hepatitis-primary biliary cirrhosis overlap syndrome in 41 patients (21.8%, 41/188), and porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) in 40 patients (21.3%, 40/188). Compared to liver cirrhosis, PSVD patients were younger and the liver function damage of which was subtler. The widths of portal vein diameter were widest in PSVD but the liver stiffness measurement were almost normal. Splenomegaly was common in PSVD, but ascites were less frequent than in autoimmune hepatitis (25.0% vs 51.1%, P = .013). Based on the histological patterns, we found that cholestatic liver diseases such as primary biliary cirrhosis, autoimmune hepatitis-primary biliary cirrhosis overlap syndrome, and progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis could lead to non-cirrhotic portal hypertension, while vascular liver diseases such as PSVD and Budd-Chiari syndrome could also show fibrous proliferation as the disease progresses. Liver biopsy is safe and valuable for etiological diagnosis of unexplained portal hypertension. Cirrhosis is the leading cause of portal hypertension, and porto-sinusoidal vascular diseases should also be considered. Clinical features may be helpful in suggesting the cause; however, pathological examination is still indispensable for disease diagnosis and progression assessment.

Cirrhosis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality globally and in India. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to ascertain the etiological spectrum and changing trends of cirrhosis in India.

We searched electronic databases, including Pubmed/Medline, Scopus, and Embase. We included original studies that reported the etiology of cirrhosis in the Indian population.

We included 158 studies (adults: 147, children: 11). The overall pooled estimate of alcohol as a cause of cirrhosis in adults was 43.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 39.8-46.6%; I2 = 97.8%), followed by nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/cryptogenic in 14.4%, 95% CI (11.7-17.3%; I2 = 98.4%), hepatitis B virus (HBV) in 11.5%, 95% CI (9.8-13.3%; I2 = 96.6%), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in 6.2%, 95% CI (4.8-7.8%; I2 = 97.2%) of the included patients. The most common cause of cirrhosis in all zones was alcohol-related. Comparison of etiologies over time revealed a reduction in the viral hepatitis-related and an increase in the proportion of alcohol-related and NAFLD/cryptogenic-related cirrhosis. The overall pooled estimates of various etiologies in children were: HBV in 10.7%, 95% CI (4.6-18.7%; I2 = 91.0%), NAFLD/Cryptogenic in 22.3%, 95% CI (9.0-39.2%; I2 = 96.7%), and HCV in 2.0%, 95% CI (0.0-8.5%; I2 = 94.6%).

Alcohol is the most common etiology of cirrhosis in adults in India. The proportions of alcohol and NAFLD-related cirrhosis are increasing, and those of viral hepatitis-related cirrhosis are reducing. The results of our meta-analysis will help formulate health policies and the allocation of resources.

Porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) is one of the common causes of portal hypertension and has overlapping features with early cirrhosis. The differentiation of PSVD from cirrhosis requires a liver biopsy, which is invasive and has potential complications. This systematic review aimed at summarizing the current evidence on the performance of noninvasive modalities for differentiating PSVD from cirrhosis.

A comprehensive search of electronic databases of MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus was conducted from 2000 to October 2022 for the studies comparing the elastographic and radiological features of PSVD and cirrhosis, using liver biopsy as the gold standard.

A total of 12 studies were included in the systematic review. Transient elastography (TE) as a modality was studied in five studies, MR elastography (MRE) in two, contrast CT in two, Contrast CT and MRI in two, and ARFI in only one. Both TE and MRE showed a significantly lower liver stiffness measurement and a higher splenic stiffness measurement with a higher SSM/LSM ratio with PSVD, compared to cirrhosis. Among the radiological features, focal nodular hyperplasia-like lesions, portal vein abnormalities (intrahepatic and extrahepatic), and a larger spleen size favored a diagnosis of PSVD. In contrast, surface nodularity and atrophy of segment IV with a segment I hypertrophy favored a diagnosis of cirrhosis.

Elastography and cross-sectional imaging can help differentiate PSVD from early cirrhosis with good accuracy. Further studies are required to assess the diagnostic role of a combination of both modalities.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a major cause of chronic liver disease globally and in India. The already high burden of NAFLD in India is expected to further increase in the future in parallel with the ongoing epidemics of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Given the high prevalence of NAFLD in the community, it is crucial to identify those at risk of progressive liver disease to streamline referral and guide proper management. Existing guidelines on NAFLD by various international societies fail to capture the entire landscape of NAFLD in India and are often difficult to incorporate in clinical practice due to fundamental differences in sociocultural aspects and health infrastructure available in India. A lot of progress has been made in the field of NAFLD in the 7 years since the initial position paper by the Indian National Association for the Study of Liver on NAFLD in 2015. Further, the ongoing debate on the nomenclature of NAFLD is creating undue confusion among clinical practitioners. The ensuing comprehensive review provides consensus-based, guidance statements on the nomenclature, diagnosis, and treatment of NAFLD that are practically implementable in the Indian setting.

The article presents clinical observation of a patient with cryptogenic cirrhosis of the liver, a chronic diffuse progressive liver disease, which is manifested by structural rearrange¬ment of its parenchyma. Cryptogenic cirrhosis is cirrhosis of uncertain etiology that lacks definitive clinical and histological criteria for a specific disease. Cryptogenic cirrhosis accounts for nearly 5% to 30% of cases of cirrhosis and nearly 10% of liver transplants. The problem of cirrhosis of the liver is extremely relevant, because this pathology is observed mainly in young and able-bodied people. In addition, it takes the first place among the causes of mortality from diseases of the digestive system. To clarify the diagnosis, laboratory and instrumental diagnostic methods of investigation were performed. Due to severe thrombocytopenia and minor leukopenia, myelodysplastic syndrome was suspected. Metabolic disorders that can be considered as probable in the occurrence of the above-mentioned changes in the liver parenchyma had been ruled out.

To study the prevalence of risk factors for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in middle-aged (40-59 years) and elderly patients (≥60 years) with cryptogenic cirrhosis as compared to those with hepatitis B or C virus (HBV or HCV) related cirrhosis.

Between August 2013 and December 2014, cases (cryptogenic cirrhosis) and controls (HBV/HCV cirrhosis) above 40 years of age were prospectively recruited and assessed for the cause and prevalence of risk factors for NAFLD.

One hundred eighteen cases (male-74%; age 55 (40-74) years; median (range); Child's class A:B:C-46:38:16) and 59 controls (male-80%; age 55.5 (40-69) years; Child's class A:B:C-56:30:14) were enrolled. Obesity (53% v/s 39%, P-0.081), diabetes mellitus (DM) (52% v/s 27%; P-0.002), family history of DM (30% v/s 13%; P-0.016), family history of Obesity (21% v/s 3.5%; P-0.002) and metabolic syndrome (65% v/s 44%; P-0.01) were more among cases than controls. Lifetime weight as obese was also longer in cases than in controls (5.9 ± 6.2 years v/s 3.2 ± 5.1 years, P-0.002). On subgroup analysis, in elderly age group, DM (55% v/s 17%, P-0.006), family history of DM (40% v/s 11%, P-0.025), metabolic syndrome (76% v/s 44%, P-0.017) and family history of obesity (19% v/s 0, P-0.047) were more common in cases as compared to controls, where as in the middle-age group, family history of obesity was the only significant factor (22% v/s 5%, P-0.025). Lifetime weight as obese was longer in cases than controls in both middle and elderly age groups.

Among middle-aged and elderly patients with cirrhosis, there was a higher prevalence of risk factors for NAFLD in those with cryptogenic cirrhosis, compared to those with HBV or HCV cirrhosis.

Living donor liver transplant (LDLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been controversial in terms of selection and outcome. We share our experience of LDLT for HCC in Indian patients.

Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing LDLT for HCC discovered either preoperatively or incidentally on explant pathology was done. Preoperative characteristics and explant histopathology findings were recorded. Overall, recurrence-free survival and factors predicting recurrence were analyzed.

Six hundred and eleven LDLT were performed between June 2011 and October 2019. HCC constituted 6.5% (n = 53) of transplant activity. Forty had preoperative diagnosis, while 13 were detected incidentally. The median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was 18 for patients with HCC. Only in 10 patients (19%), HCC was the primary indication for liver transplant (LT), and the rest had undergone transplant for progressive decompensation. Thirty-two patients were within up-to-7, while 21 were outside up-to-7 criteria. Overall 5-year survival was 85.4% and recurrence-free survival was 83.3% after a median follow-up of 35 months (13-59). This was similar to LDLT for other indications (81.2% at 5 years). Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence After Transplant (RETREAT) score was best able to predict recurrence (p = 0.03) with odds ratio of 6.8.

Patients with HCC in India present late for liver transplant. Most patients have some form of decompensation before they undergo LT. In selected patients, overall survival was comparable with other indications for LDLT with acceptable recurrence rates. RETREAT score was best to predict recurrence.

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension consists of a group of diseases characterized by signs and complications of portal hypertension, which differ from cirrhosis through histological alterations, hemodynamic characterization and, clinical outcome. Because of the similarities in clinical presentation and imaging signs, frequently these patients, and particularly those with porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD), are misdiagnosed as having liver cirrhosis and thus raising difficulties in their diagnosis. The most challenging differentiation to be considered is between PSVD and cirrhosis and, although not pathognomonic, liver biopsy is still the standard of diagnosis. Although they still require extended validation before being broadly used, new non-invasive methods for the diagnosis of porto-sinusoidal vascular disease, like transient elastography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound or metabolomic profiling, have shown promising results. Another issue is the differentiation between PSVD and chronic extrahepatic portal vein obstruction, especially now when it is known that 40% of patients suffering from PSVD develop portal vein thrombosis. In this particular case, once the portal vein thrombosis occurred, the diagnosis of PSVD is impossible according to the current guidelines. Moreover, so far, the differentiation between PSVD and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome has not been clear so far in particular circumstances. In this review we highlighted the diagnostic challenges regarding the PSVD, as well as the current techniques used in the evaluation of these patients.