1
|
Ait Mohand J, Alves A, Brouquet A, Germain A, Bridoux V, Trilling B, Buscail E, Valibouze C, Leroy M, Desreumaux P, Zerbib P. Fate of ileorectal anastomosis for treating Crohn's disease in the era of biologics: Results from a French retrospective multicentre cohort study. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:1941-1949. [PMID: 39317953 DOI: 10.1111/codi.17185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Revised: 08/03/2024] [Accepted: 08/31/2024] [Indexed: 09/26/2024]
Abstract
AIM The rate of surgical recurrence following ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) remains poorly understood. Most studies were conducted before the advent of biologics. Our aim was to assess the fate of IRA in patients with CD during the biologics era and identify risk factors for endoscopic, clinical, and surgical recurrence. METHODS This retrospective multicentre cohort study included patients with CD who underwent IRA between 2006 and 2022. The association of patient characteristics and postoperative measures with each type of postoperative recurrence and need for a definitive stoma was investigated using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS During a median follow-up period of 60 months, the rates of endoscopic, clinical, and surgical postoperative recurrence were 70%, 59%, and 35%, respectively. The rate of perianal lesions was higher in patients who underwent a definitive stoma (70% vs. 35%, p = 0.007) and with endoscopic (50% vs. 25%, p = 0.038), clinical (54% vs. 24%, p = 0.006), and surgical (63% vs. 34%, p = 0.015) recurrence. The incidence of residual microscopic disease at the rectal margin was higher in patients with endoscopic recurrence (p = 0.047). Biologics were identified as protective factors against the need for a definitive stoma (p = 0.044). CONCLUSION IRA is a good treatment option for extensive colitis in patients with CD. However, its consideration should be weighed in the presence of perianal lesions, which have been shown to be a risk factor for delayed proctectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juba Ait Mohand
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital of Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
| | - Arnaud Alves
- Unité INSERM UMR 1086 ANTICIPE Registre spécialisé Des Tumeurs Digestives du Calvados-Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Université de Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| | - Antoine Brouquet
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Bicêtre Hospital, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | | | - Valerie Bridoux
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Bertrand Trilling
- TIMC, CHU Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, UMR 5525, VetAgro Sup, Grenoble INP, University of Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Etienne Buscail
- Department of Surgery, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil and Toulouse University, Toulouse, France
| | - Caroline Valibouze
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital of Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
| | - Maxime Leroy
- Department of Biostatistics, University Hospital of Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
| | - Pierre Desreumaux
- Inserm, U1286-INFINITE, Institute for Translational Research in Inflammation, University Hospital of Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
| | - Philippe Zerbib
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital of Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fujiyoshi K, Sudo T, Fujita F, Tanihara S, Ishida H, Shichijo S, Chino A, Nagasaski T, Takao A, Sasaki K, Akagi K, Matsubara T, Ueno H, Hirata K, Miyakura Y, Ishikawa T, Sunami E, Takahashi Y, Yamaguchi T, Tanakaya K, Tomita N, Ajioka Y. Marital status after colorectal surgery in familial adenomatous polyposis: a nationwide multicenter study in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 2024; 29:1274-1283. [PMID: 38819608 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02558-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) experience psychological and social challenges concerning future events such as marriage and childbirth alongside the medical risks of colorectal cancer (CRC) and FAP-related disease. We retrospectively investigated the rate of marriage and childbirth postoperatively in Japanese patients with FAP. METHODS We included 161 patients who had colorectal surgery and reported marital status from a national survey of 35 Japanese institutions. Participants were classified according to marital status: married before colectomy (80 patients), married after colectomy (13 patients), and unmarried (68 patients). RESULTS The marriage rate for all 161 patients (57.8%, standardized ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-1.14) was comparable to that in the general Japanese population (57.1%). The marriage rate among the 81 patients who were unmarried before colectomy was low (16.0%); however, the standardized marital ratio (0.75, 95% CI 0.34-1.15) was not significantly lower than that of the general population. In multivariable logistic regression, younger age (born after 1980, odds ratio [OR] 0.12, p < 0.001) and genetic testing (OR 4.06, p = 0.001) were associated with postoperative marriage. Seventy-one percent of patients with FAP who married after colectomy became pregnant and achieved delivery. CONCLUSIONS The marriage rate of patients with FAP was comparable to that of the general population whereas the rate after colectomy was low among patients with FAP. However, in patients with FAP, colorectal surgery itself may not lead to negative consequences in terms of fecundity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Fujiyoshi
- Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahimachi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan.
| | - Tomoya Sudo
- Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahimachi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan
- Study Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Sanbancho KS Building, 2 Sanbancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0075, Japan
| | - Fumihiko Fujita
- Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahimachi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan
| | - Shinichi Tanihara
- Department of Public Health, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahimachi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Ishida
- Study Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Sanbancho KS Building, 2 Sanbancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0075, Japan
- Department of Digestive Tract and General Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1981 Kamoda, Kawagoe, 350-8550, Japan
| | - Satoki Shichijo
- Study Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Sanbancho KS Building, 2 Sanbancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0075, Japan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan
| | - Akiko Chino
- Study Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Sanbancho KS Building, 2 Sanbancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0075, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Toshiya Nagasaski
- Study Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Sanbancho KS Building, 2 Sanbancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0075, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Akinari Takao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677, Japan
| | - Kazuhito Sasaki
- Study Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Sanbancho KS Building, 2 Sanbancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0075, Japan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Kiwamu Akagi
- Study Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Sanbancho KS Building, 2 Sanbancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0075, Japan
- Division of Molecular Diagnosis and Cancer Prevention, Saitama Cancer Center, 818 Komuro, Ina-machi, Kitaadachi-gun, Saitama, 362-0806, Japan
| | - Takaaki Matsubara
- Study Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Sanbancho KS Building, 2 Sanbancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0075, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan
| | - Hideki Ueno
- Study Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Sanbancho KS Building, 2 Sanbancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0075, Japan
- Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College, 3-2 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-8513, Japan
| | - Keiji Hirata
- Study Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Sanbancho KS Building, 2 Sanbancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0075, Japan
- Department of Surgery I, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1, Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu-shi, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Miyakura
- Study Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Sanbancho KS Building, 2 Sanbancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0075, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center Jichi Medical University, 1-847 Amanuma-cho, Omiya-ku, Saitama-shi, Saitama, 330-0834, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Ishikawa
- Study Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Sanbancho KS Building, 2 Sanbancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0075, Japan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan
| | - Eiji Sunami
- Study Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Sanbancho KS Building, 2 Sanbancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0075, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Kyorin University School of Medicine, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka-shi, Tokyo, 181-0004, Japan
| | - Yusuke Takahashi
- Study Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Sanbancho KS Building, 2 Sanbancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0075, Japan
- Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, 2-1-1 Hoenzaka, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 540-0006, Japan
| | - Tatsuro Yamaguchi
- Study Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Sanbancho KS Building, 2 Sanbancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0075, Japan
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677, Japan
| | - Kohji Tanakaya
- Study Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Sanbancho KS Building, 2 Sanbancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0075, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Iwakuni Clinical Center, 1-1-1 Atago-cho, Iwakuni-shi, Yamaguchi, 740-8510, Japan
| | - Naohiro Tomita
- Study Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Sanbancho KS Building, 2 Sanbancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0075, Japan
- Cancer Treatment Center, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, 4-14-1 Shibahara-cho, Toyonaka-shi, Osaka, 560-8565, Japan
| | - Yoichi Ajioka
- Study Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Sanbancho KS Building, 2 Sanbancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0075, Japan
- Division of Molecular and Diagnostic Pathology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 757 Ichibancho, Asahimachi-dori, Chuo Ward, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Falsetti I, Palmini G, Iantomasi T, Brandi ML, Tonelli F. Mechanisms of Action of Phytoestrogens and Their Role in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Pharmaceutics 2024; 16:640. [PMID: 38794302 PMCID: PMC11125335 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16050640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a rare disease characterized by the development of adenomatous polyps in the colon and rectum already in adolescence. If left untreated, patients develop colorectal cancer (CRC) with a 100% probability. To date, the gold standard of FAP management is surgery, which is associated with morbidity and mortality. A chemopreventive agent capable of delaying, preventing and reversing the development of CRC has been sought. Several classes of drugs have been used but to date no chemopreventive drug has been found for the management of this disease. In recent years, the importance of estrogen receptors in FAP and CRC, particularly the β subtype, has emerged. Indeed, the expression of the latter is strongly reduced in adenomatous polyps and CRC and is inversely correlated with the aggressiveness of the disease. Since phytoestrogens have a high affinity for this receptor, they have been suggested for use as chemopreventive agents in FAP and CRC. A combination of phytoestrogens and insoluble fibres has proved particularly effective. In this review, the various mechanisms of action of phytoestrogens were analyzed and the effectiveness of using phytoestrogens as an effective chemopreventive strategy was discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Falsetti
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy; (I.F.); (T.I.)
| | - Gaia Palmini
- Fondazione Italiana Ricerca sulle Malattie dell’Osso (FIRMO Onlus), 50129 Florence, Italy; (G.P.); (M.L.B.)
| | - Teresa Iantomasi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy; (I.F.); (T.I.)
| | - Maria Luisa Brandi
- Fondazione Italiana Ricerca sulle Malattie dell’Osso (FIRMO Onlus), 50129 Florence, Italy; (G.P.); (M.L.B.)
| | - Francesco Tonelli
- Fondazione Italiana Ricerca sulle Malattie dell’Osso (FIRMO Onlus), 50129 Florence, Italy; (G.P.); (M.L.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Trembath HE, Yeh JJ, Lopez NE. Gastrointestinal Malignancy: Genetic Implications to Clinical Applications. Cancer Treat Res 2024; 192:305-418. [PMID: 39212927 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-61238-1_15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Advances in molecular genetics have revolutionized our understanding of the pathogenesis, progression, and therapeutic options for treating gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the molecular landscape of GI cancers, focusing on key genetic alterations implicated in tumorigenesis across various anatomical sites including GIST, colon and rectum, and pancreas. Emphasis is placed on critical oncogenic pathways, such as mutations in tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, chromosomal instability, microsatellite instability, and epigenetic modifications. The role of molecular biomarkers in predicting prognosis, guiding treatment decisions, and monitoring therapeutic response is discussed, highlighting the integration of genomic profiling into clinical practice. Finally, we address the evolving landscape of precision oncology in GI cancers, considering targeted therapies and immunotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah E Trembath
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, 4303 La Jolla Village Drive Suite 2110, San Diego, CA, 92122, USA
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, 170 Manning Drive, CB#7213, 1150 Physician's Office Building, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7213, USA
| | - Jen Jen Yeh
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, 4303 La Jolla Village Drive Suite 2110, San Diego, CA, 92122, USA
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, 170 Manning Drive, CB#7213, 1150 Physician's Office Building, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7213, USA
| | - Nicole E Lopez
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, 4303 La Jolla Village Drive Suite 2110, San Diego, CA, 92122, USA.
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, 170 Manning Drive, CB#7213, 1150 Physician's Office Building, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7213, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rausa E, Colletti G, Ciniselli CM, Signoroni S, Duroni V, Cavalcoli F, Magarotto A, Ricci MT, Brignola C, Biasoni D, Verderio P, Vitellaro M. Superior rectal artery preservation to reduce anastomotic leak rates in familial adenomatous polyposis patients treated with total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol 2023; 27:1327-1334. [PMID: 37688717 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02858-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (TC/IRA) is one of the prophylactic surgical options in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). This study investigated the effectiveness of superior rectal artery (SRA) preservation during TC/IRA in reducing anastomotic leakage (AL). METHODS This retrospective study was based on prospectively collected data (01/2000 - 12/2022) at the National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy. FAP patients undergoing TC/IRA were enrolled. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Associations between SRA preservation and complications were investigated using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS The study population included 211 patients undergoing TC/IRA (Sex: 106 Male, 105 Female; Age: median 30 yrs, IQR: 20-48 yrs), 82 with SRA preservation (SRA group) and 129 without SRA preservation (controls). After PSM, 75 patients were considered for each group. SRA preservation was associated with fewer complications (OR 0.331, 95% CI 0.116; 0.942) in univariate logistic regression analysis. AL events were significantly fewer in the SRA group than in the control group (0 vs 12, p = 0.028). The SRA group had fewer overall surgical complication and pelvic sepsis rates (p = 0.020 and p = 0.028, respectively). Median operative time was significantly longer in the SRA group (340 min vs 240 min, p<0.001), and median hospital stay was significantly shorter (6 vs 7 days, p=0.017). Twenty-seven patients in the SRA group experienced intraoperative anastomotic bleeding, which was controlled endoscopically. Superimposable results were obtained analyzing the whole patient cohort. CONCLUSIONS SRA preservation can be considered an advantage in this patient population, despite adding a further technical step during surgery and thereby prolonging the operative time. Intraoperative endoscopic checking of possible anastomotic bleeding sites is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Rausa
- Unit of Hereditary Digestive Tract Tumors, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, Milan, Italy
| | - G Colletti
- Colorectal Surgery Division, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, Milan, Italy
| | - C M Ciniselli
- Unit of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, Milan, Italy.
| | - S Signoroni
- Unit of Hereditary Digestive Tract Tumors, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, Milan, Italy
| | - V Duroni
- Unit of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, Milan, Italy
| | - F Cavalcoli
- Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - A Magarotto
- Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - M T Ricci
- Unit of Hereditary Digestive Tract Tumors, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, Milan, Italy
| | - C Brignola
- Unit of Hereditary Digestive Tract Tumors, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, Milan, Italy
| | - D Biasoni
- Pediatric Surgical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - P Verderio
- Unit of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, Milan, Italy
| | - M Vitellaro
- Unit of Hereditary Digestive Tract Tumors, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, Milan, Italy
- Colorectal Surgery Division, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kabir M, Thomas-Gibson S, Tozer PJ, Warusavitarne J, Faiz O, Hart A, Allison L, Acheson AG, Atici SD, Avery P, Brar M, Carvello M, Choy MC, Dart RJ, Davies J, Dhar A, Din S, Hayee B, Kandiah K, Katsanos KH, Lamb CA, Limdi JK, Lovegrove RE, Myrelid P, Noor N, Papaconstantinou I, Petrova D, Pavlidis P, Pinkney T, Proud D, Radford S, Rao R, Sebastian S, Segal JP, Selinger C, Spinelli A, Thomas K, Wolthuis A, Wilson A. DECIDE: Delphi Expert Consensus Statement on Inflammatory Bowel Disease Dysplasia Shared Management Decision-Making. J Crohns Colitis 2023; 17:1652-1671. [PMID: 37171140 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Inflammatory bowel disease colitis-associated dysplasia is managed with either enhanced surveillance and endoscopic resection or prophylactic surgery. The rate of progression to cancer after a dysplasia diagnosis remains uncertain in many cases and patients have high thresholds for accepting proctocolectomy. Individualised discussion of management options is encouraged to take place between patients and their multidisciplinary teams for best outcomes. We aimed to develop a toolkit to support a structured, multidisciplinary and shared decision-making approach to discussions about dysplasia management options between clinicians and their patients. METHODS Evidence from systematic literature reviews, mixed-methods studies conducted with key stakeholders, and decision-making expert recommendations were consolidated to draft consensus statements by the DECIDE steering group. These were then subjected to an international, multidisciplinary modified electronic Delphi process until an a priori threshold of 80% agreement was achieved to establish consensus for each statement. RESULTS In all, 31 members [15 gastroenterologists, 14 colorectal surgeons and two nurse specialists] from nine countries formed the Delphi panel. We present the 18 consensus statements generated after two iterative rounds of anonymous voting. CONCLUSIONS By consolidating evidence for best practice using literature review and key stakeholder and decision-making expert consultation, we have developed international consensus recommendations to support health care professionals counselling patients on the management of high cancer risk colitis-associated dysplasia. The final toolkit includes clinician and patient decision aids to facilitate shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Misha Kabir
- Division of GI Services, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer or Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London , London, UK
| | - Siwan Thomas-Gibson
- Department of Surgery and Cancer or Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London , London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology or Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Phil J Tozer
- Department of Surgery and Cancer or Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London , London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology or Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Janindra Warusavitarne
- Department of Surgery and Cancer or Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London , London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology or Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Omar Faiz
- Department of Surgery and Cancer or Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London , London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology or Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ailsa Hart
- Department of Surgery and Cancer or Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London , London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology or Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Lisa Allison
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Austin G Acheson
- Department of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Semra Demirli Atici
- Department of Surgery, University of Health Sciences Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Pearl Avery
- Department of Gastroenterology or Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Mantaj Brar
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michele Carvello
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Matthew C Choy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Division of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Austin Academic Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Robin J Dart
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Justin Davies
- Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anjan Dhar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Darlington Memorial Hospital, County Durham & Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Teesside University, UK, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Shahida Din
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Bu'Hussain Hayee
- Department of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Kesavan Kandiah
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Konstantinos H Katsanos
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ioannina School of Health Sciences, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Christopher Andrew Lamb
- Translational & Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jimmy K Limdi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Manchester , Manchester, UK
| | - Richard E Lovegrove
- Department of Surgery, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust , Worcester, UK
| | - Pär Myrelid
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Nurulamin Noor
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ioannis Papaconstantinou
- Department of Surgery, Aretaieion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, A thens, Greece
| | - Dafina Petrova
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública [EASP], Granada, Spain
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health [CIBERESP], Madrid, Spain
| | - Polychronis Pavlidis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Thomas Pinkney
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - David Proud
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg Victoria, VIC, Australia
| | - Shellie Radford
- Department of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Rohit Rao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Shaji Sebastian
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
| | - Jonathan P Segal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Hospital Epping, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christian Selinger
- Department of Gastroenterology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kathryn Thomas
- Department of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals, UK
| | - Albert Wolthuis
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, The Netherlands
| | - Ana Wilson
- Department of Surgery and Cancer or Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London , London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology or Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Landay SL, Burns JA, Bickle ML, Baltich Nelson B, Nipp RD. Fertility preservation in reproductive-aged female patients with colorectal cancer: a scoping review. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:612. [PMID: 37796328 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08081-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in adults younger than 50 years is steadily increasing in the USA, and treatment for CRC can impact future fertility. However, fertility decision-making in female patients with CRC can be complex, with fertility preservation (FP) counseling occurring inconsistently. PURPOSE The goal of this scoping review was to assess the literature regarding the frequency and quality of fertility preservation (FP) discussions taking place among oncology clinicians and their reproductive-age female patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) in order to identify existing gaps in care and inform future research, interventions, or potential changes in practice. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the Ovid Medline, PsycInfo, and Scopus databases in order to identify studies pertaining to FP counseling in reproductive-age female patients with CRC. We used Covidence to screen studies for relevance and to extract data. Findings of interest included rate of fertility and/or FP discussions, patient characteristics associated with fertility discussions, initiators of discussions, rate of referrals to fertility specialists, patient utilization of FP services, and unmet fertility needs. We performed both quantitative and qualitative data synthesis. RESULTS We identified five studies that met our inclusion criteria, all published between 2007 and 2022. Frequency of fertility counseling discussions was low across studies, with a range of 15 to 52.5% of female patients with CRC receiving counseling. Patient characteristics which may be associated with likelihood of fertility discussion included age, parity, number of children, cancer location and stage, treatment type, and quality of life. The literature suggested that fertility discussions were initiated by clinicians about two-thirds of the time, and medical oncologists were the clinicians most likely to initiate. Studies did capture unmet fertility-related patient needs; participants who did not receive counseling often expressed desire for these discussions and regret that they did not occur. CONCLUSION Despite increasing incidence of CRC in patients at younger ages, this scoping review found a dearth of research conducted on young female CRC patients' experiences with fertility counseling and referrals. Notably, the existing research reveals that relatively few of these patients are receiving appropriate counseling. Additional research is needed to clarify current FP counseling practices, patient and clinician perceptions about FP, and ways to improve the quantity and quality of FP counseling in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia L Landay
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Jamie A Burns
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lenox Hill Hospital-Northwell Health, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY, USA
| | - Madison L Bickle
- OU Health Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | | - Ryan D Nipp
- OU Health Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Challine A, Voron T, O'Connell L, Chafai N, Debove C, Collard MK, Parc Y, Lefèvre JH. Does an Ileoanal Anastomosis Decrease the Rate of Successful Pregnancy Compared With an Ileorectal Anastomosis? A National Study of 1491 Patients. Ann Surg 2023; 277:806-812. [PMID: 35837902 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Report the rate of successful pregnancy in a national cohort of women with either an ileal pouch anal (IPAA) or ileorectal (IRA) anastomosis constructed after colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or polyposis. BACKGROUND Fertility after IPAA is probably impaired. All available data are corroborated by only small sample size studies. It is not known whether construction of IPAA versus IRA influences the odds of subsequently achieving a successful pregnancy, especially with increased utilization of the laparoscopic approach. METHODS All women (age: 12-45 y) undergoing IRA or IPAA in France for polyposis or IBD, between 2010-2020, were included. A control population was defined as women aged from 12 to 45 years undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy during the same period. The odds of successful pregnancy were studied using an adjusted survival analysis. RESULTS A total of 1491 women (IPAA=872, 58%; IRA=619, 42%) were included. A total of 220 deliveries (15%) occurred during the follow-up period of 71 months (39-100). After adjustment, the odds of successful pregnancy was not significantly associated with type of anastomosis (after IPAA: Hazard Ratio [HR]=0.79, 95% confidence interval=0.56-1.11, P =0.17). The laparoscopic approach increased the odds of achieving successful pregnancy (HR=1.79, 95% confidence interval=1.20-2.63, P =0.004). IRA and IPAA significantly impacted fertility when compared with the control population ( P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS In this large cohort study, total colectomy for polyposis or IBD was associated with reduced fertility compared with the general population. No difference in odds of achieving successful pregnancy was found between IRA and IPAA after adjustment. This analysis suggests laparoscopic surgery may be associated with greater likelihood of pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Challine
- Department of Digestive Surgery, APHP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Inserm UMR 1138, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Thibault Voron
- Department of Digestive Surgery, APHP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Lauren O'Connell
- Centre for Colorectal Disease, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Najim Chafai
- Department of Digestive Surgery, APHP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Clotilde Debove
- Department of Digestive Surgery, APHP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Maxime K Collard
- Department of Digestive Surgery, APHP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Yann Parc
- Department of Digestive Surgery, APHP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Jérémie H Lefèvre
- Department of Digestive Surgery, APHP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Risto A, Nordenvall C, Deputy M, Hermanson M, Lindforss U, Block M, Faiz O, Myrelid P. Colectomy reconstruction for ulcerative colitis in Sweden and England: a multicenter prospective comparison between ileorectal anastomosis and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis after colectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis. (CRUISE-study). BMC Surg 2023; 23:96. [PMID: 37085812 PMCID: PMC10122388 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-01984-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are no prospective trials comparing the two main reconstructive options after colectomy for Ulcerative colitis, ileal pouch anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis. An attempt on a randomized controlled trial has been made but after receiving standardized information patients insisted on choosing operation themselves. METHODS Adult Ulcerative colitis patients subjected to colectomy eligible for both ileal pouch anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis are asked to participate and after receiving standardized information the get to choose reconstructive method. Patients declining reconstruction or not considered eligible for both methods will be followed as controls. The CRUISE study is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center, open-label, controlled trial on satisfaction, QoL, function, and complications between ileal pouch anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis. DISCUSSION Reconstruction after colectomy is a morbidity-associated as well as a resource-intensive activity with the sole purpose of enhancing function, QoL and patient satisfaction. The aim of this study is to provide the best possible information on the risks and benefits of each reconstructive treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05628701.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton Risto
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University Hospital Linköping, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
- Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden.
| | - Caroline Nordenvall
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Center for Digestive Disease, Division of Coloproctology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mohammed Deputy
- St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Maria Hermanson
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ulrik Lindforss
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Center for Digestive Disease, Division of Coloproctology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mattias Block
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Omar Faiz
- Center for Digestive Disease, Division of Coloproctology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK
| | - Pär Myrelid
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University Hospital Linköping, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Desmoid disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Abdominal desmoid disease usually follows total proctocolectomy with IPAA or total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis. Sex, extraintestinal manifestations, and a 3'-mutation location have been identified as risk factors, but surgical risk factors are poorly understood. We hypothesized that pouch construction creates a higher risk of desmoid formation due to the increased stretch of the small-bowel mesentery. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the surgical risk factors for desmoid formation. DESIGN This was a retrospective, single-center, registry-based cohort study. SETTINGS This study was conducted at a single academic institution with a prospectively maintained hereditary colorectal cancer database between 1995 and 2015. PATIENTS All patients with familial polyposis (total 345) who underwent either proctocolectomy with a pouch or colectomy with an ileorectal anastomosis during the study period and met inclusion criteria were selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The development of symptomatic abdominal desmoid disease was the primary end point. Associations between desmoid formation and resection type, surgical approach, and other patient factors were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 172 (49%) patients underwent proctocolectomy/ileoanal pouch, whereas 173 (51%) underwent total colectomy/ileorectal anastomosis. Overall, 100 (28.9%) developed symptomatic desmoids after surgery. On univariable analysis, open surgery and pouch surgery were associated with desmoid development, along with extracolonic manifestations, family history of desmoids, mutation location, and a high desmoid risk score. On multivarible analysis, proctocolectomy with pouch was most strongly associated with desmoid disease ( p < 0.01). LIMITATIONS This study was limited by its retrospective nature, the lack of uniform desmoid screening, and the variable duration of follow-up. Unanalyzed confounding factors include polyposis severity and number of surgeries. CONCLUSIONS Patients with polyposis who underwent total proctocolectomy with pouch by any approach had significantly greater risk of developing desmoid disease than total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis, even when accounting for other risk factors. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B822 .RESULTADOS DE LOS PACIENTES SOMETIDOS A RESECCIÓN INTESTINAL ELECTIVA ANTES Y DESPUÉS DE LA IMPLEMENTACIÓN DE UN PROGRAMA DE DETECCIÓN Y TRATAMIENTO DE ANEMIA. ANTECEDENTES Se sabe que los pacientes anémicos que se someten a una cirugía electiva de cáncer colorrectal tienen tasas significativamente más altas de complicaciones posoperatorias y peores resultados. OBJETIVO Mejorar las tasas de detección y tratamiento de la anemia en pacientes sometidos a resecciones electivas de colon y recto a través de una iniciativa de mejora de calidad. DISEO Comparamos una cohorte histórica de pacientes antes de la implementación de nuestro programa de detección de anemia y mejora de la calidad del tratamiento con una cohorte prospectiva después de la implementación. ENTORNO CLINICO Hospital de atención terciaria. PACIENTES Todos los pacientes adultos con un nuevo diagnóstico de cáncer de colon o recto sin evidencia de enfermedad metastásica entre 2017 y 2019. INTERVENCIONES Detección de anemia y programa de mejora de la calidad del tratamiento. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO El resultado primario fue el costo hospitalario por ingreso. RESULTADOS Un total de 84 pacientes se sometieron a resección electiva de colon o recto antes de la implementación de nuestro proyecto de mejora de calidad de la anemia y 88 pacientes se sometieron a cirugía después. En la cohorte previa a la implementación, 44/84 (55,9 %) presentaban anemia en comparación con 47/99 (54,7 %) en la cohorte posterior a la implementación. Las tasas de detección (25 % a 86,4 %) y tratamiento (27,8 % a 63,8 %) aumentaron significativamente en la cohorte posterior a la implementación. El costo total medio por admisión se redujo significativamente en la cohorte posterior a la implementación (costo medio $16 827 vs. $25 796, p = 0,004); esta reducción significativa se observó incluso después de ajustar los factores de confusión relevantes (proporción de medias: 0,74, IC del 95 %: 0,65 a 0,85). El vínculo mecánico entre el tratamiento de la anemia y la reducción de costos sigue siendo desconocido. No hubo diferencias significativas en las tasas de transfusión de sangre, complicaciones o mortalidad entre los grupos. LIMITACIONES El diseño de antes y después está sujeto a sesgos temporales y de selección. CONCLUSIONES Demostramos la implementación exitosa de un programa de detección y tratamiento de anemia. Este programa se asoció con un costo por admisión significativamente reducido. Este trabajo demuestra el valor y los beneficios posibles de la implementación de un programa de detección y tratamiento de la anemia. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C15 . (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).
Collapse
|
11
|
Addison P, Keshinro AO, Schwartzberg DM. The Benefits and Drawbacks of Staging Pelvic Pouches. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2022; 35:445-452. [PMID: 36591400 PMCID: PMC9797283 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Since the mid-20th century, physicians have searched for way to improve the lives of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Early attempts of curative resection left the patients with a permanent stoma with only primitive stoma appliances available. Gradually, stoma care improved and operations were devised to give the patient bowel continuity without the need for a permanent ostomy. As these operations were evolving, benefits and drawbacks related to fertility, ease of small bowel reach to the pelvis, and postoperative pelvic sepsis were observed. In this article, we will elucidate the various ways pelvic pouches are used to treat UC and the rationale for the timing of surgery as well as the evolution of stoma care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Poppy Addison
- Department of Surgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Ajaratu O. Keshinro
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - David M. Schwartzberg
- Division of Colorectal Surgery and Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Department of Surgery, New York–Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sriranganathan D, Poo S, Segal JP. The impact of the ileoanal pouch on female fertility in ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:918-924. [PMID: 35322933 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIM Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is a restorative option for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) requiring surgery. The primary outcome of this study was the relative risk of infertility in women with UC undergoing restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) compared to the same patients before undergoing RPC. Infertility was defined as the inability to conceive after 1 year of regular sexual intercourse without contraception. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to include all relevant articles from 1946 from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies included reported on the fertility rate of a cohort with UC and also reported the rate after RPC in those within the cohort who underwent surgery. This study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021259745). RESULTS Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria and accounted for 793 patients pre-pouch and 802 post-pouch. The mean and median age of the patients at analysis was 36.8 and 32.7 years respectively; and the median duration of follow-up following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was 110.4 (68-139) months. Our results highlight that following RPC the relative risk of infertility is 4.17 (95% CI 1.99, 8.74) compared with patients before RPC who had UC. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this meta-analysis provide an update on a previous meta-analysis published over a decade ago and results remain congruent. This suggests that despite advancements in surgical techniques the risk to fertility remains similar to a decade ago. However, further high quality studies are needed to try and decipher independent risk factors associated with a decrease in infertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danujan Sriranganathan
- Department of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, College Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Stephanie Poo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UK
| | - Jonathan P Segal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hampel H, Kalady MF, Pearlman R, Stanich PP. Hereditary Colorectal Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2022; 36:429-447. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
14
|
Aelvoet AS, Buttitta F, Ricciardiello L, Dekker E. Management of familial adenomatous polyposis and MUTYH-associated polyposis; new insights. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2022; 58-59:101793. [PMID: 35988966 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2022.101793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) are rare inherited polyposis syndromes with a high colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Therefore, frequent endoscopic surveillance including polypectomy of relevant premalignant lesions from a young age is warranted in patients. In FAP and less often in MAP, prophylactic colectomy is indicated followed by lifelong endoscopic surveillance of the retained rectum after (sub)total colectomy and ileal pouch after proctocolectomy to prevent CRC. No consensus is reached on the right type and timing of colectomy. As patients with FAP and MAP nowadays have an almost normal life-expectancy due to adequate treatment of colorectal polyposis, challenges in the management of FAP and MAP have shifted towards the treatment of duodenal and gastric adenomas as well as desmoid treatment in FAP. Whereas up until recently upper gastrointestinal surveillance was mostly diagnostic and patients were referred for surgery once duodenal or gastric polyposis was advanced, nowadays endoscopic treatment of premalignant lesions is widely performed. Aiming to reduce polyp burden in the colorectum as well as in the upper gastrointestinal tract, several chemopreventive agents are currently being studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur S Aelvoet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Francesco Buttitta
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico di Sant'Orsola, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Luigi Ricciardiello
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico di Sant'Orsola, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cunningham LA, Gasior A, Kalady MF. Management of Colorectal Cancer in Hereditary Syndromes. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2022; 31:307-319. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2021.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
16
|
Stanich PP, Sullivan B, Kim AC, Kalady MF. Endoscopic Management and Surgical Considerations for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2022; 32:113-130. [PMID: 34798980 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2021.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is the development of many adenomatous colorectal polyps. Colonoscopy is recommended to start at age 10 to 12 years at intervals of 1 to 2 years. Colectomy is clearly indicated for malignancy or significant colorectal symptoms. After colectomy, endoscopic surveillance is still critical. Duodenal and gastric polyposis is also found in almost all patients with FAP. Screening with upper endoscopy and ampullary visualization is recommended, generally determined by age and staging of duodenal polyposis, but guidelines are increasingly factoring in ampullary and gastric manifestations. Surgical management of malignancy or advanced upper tract manifestations is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter P Stanich
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 West 12th Avenue, Suite 200, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
| | - Brian Sullivan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710, USA. https://twitter.com/gi_sullivan
| | - Alex C Kim
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, N924 Doan Hall, 410 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. https://twitter.com/CRS_HIPEC
| | - Matthew F Kalady
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 737 Doan Hall, 410 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. https://twitter.com/MattKaladyMD
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2020 for the Clinical Practice of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2021; 26:1353-1419. [PMID: 34185173 PMCID: PMC8286959 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01881-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Hereditary colorectal cancer (HCRC) accounts for < 5% of all colorectal cancer cases. Some of the unique characteristics commonly encountered in HCRC cases include early age of onset, synchronous/metachronous cancer occurrence, and multiple cancers in other organs. These characteristics necessitate different management approaches, including diagnosis, treatment or surveillance, from sporadic colorectal cancer management. There are two representative HCRC, named familial adenomatous polyposis and Lynch syndrome. Other than these two HCRC syndromes, related disorders have also been reported. Several guidelines for hereditary disorders have already been published worldwide. In Japan, the first guideline for HCRC was prepared by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR), published in 2012 and revised in 2016. This revised version of the guideline was immediately translated into English and published in 2017. Since then, several new findings and novel disease concepts related to HCRC have been discovered. The currently diagnosed HCRC rate in daily clinical practice is relatively low; however, this is predicted to increase in the era of cancer genomic medicine, with the advancement of cancer multi-gene panel testing or whole genome testing, among others. Under these circumstances, the JSCCR guidelines 2020 for HCRC were prepared by consensus among members of the JSCCR HCRC Guideline Committee, based on a careful review of the evidence retrieved from literature searches, and considering the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice settings in Japan. Herein, we present the English version of the JSCCR guidelines 2020 for HCRC.
Collapse
|
18
|
Kohzaki M, Ootsuyama A, Umata T, Okazaki R. Comparison of the fertility of tumor suppressor gene-deficient C57BL/6 mouse strains reveals stable reproductive aging and novel pleiotropic gene. Sci Rep 2021; 11:12357. [PMID: 34117297 PMCID: PMC8195996 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91342-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumor suppressor genes are involved in maintaining genome integrity during reproduction (e.g., meiosis). Thus, deleterious alleles in tumor suppressor-deficient mice would exhibit higher mortality during the perinatal period. A recent aging model proposes that perinatal mortality and age-related deleterious changes might define lifespan. This study aimed to quantitatively understand the relationship between reproduction and lifespan using three established tumor suppressor gene (p53, APC, and RECQL4)-deficient mouse strains with the same C57BL/6 background. Transgenic mice delivered slightly reduced numbers of 1st pups than wild-type mice [ratio: 0.81–0.93 (p = 0.1–0.61)] during a similar delivery period, which suggest that the tumor suppressor gene-deficient mice undergo relatively stable reproduction. However, the transgenic 1st pups died within a few days after birth, resulting in a further reduction in litter size at 3 weeks after delivery compared with that of wild-type mice [ratio: 0.35–0.68 (p = 0.034–0.24)] without sex differences, although the lifespan was variable. Unexpectedly, the significance of reproductive reduction in transgenic mice was decreased at the 2nd or later delivery. Because mice are easily affected by environmental factors, our data underscore the importance of defining reproductive ability through experiments on aging-related reproduction that can reveal a trade-off between fecundity and aging and identify RECQL4 as a novel pleiotropic gene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaoki Kohzaki
- Department of Radiobiology and Hygiene Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, 1-1 Iseigaoka Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, 807-8555, Japan.
| | - Akira Ootsuyama
- Department of Radiation Biology and Health, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, 1-1 Iseigaoka Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, 807-8555, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Umata
- Radioisotope Research Center, Facility for Education and Research Support, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, 1-1 Iseigaoka Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, 807-8555, Japan
| | - Ryuji Okazaki
- Department of Radiobiology and Hygiene Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, 1-1 Iseigaoka Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, 807-8555, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Clark-Snustad K, Butnariu M, Afzali A. Women's Health and Ulcerative Colitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2020; 49:769-789. [PMID: 33121695 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2020.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Although ulcerative colitis affects males and females at similar rates, certain sex-specific differences influence the disease-related risks and experiences of females with ulcerative colitis. This article reviews topics that affect females with ulcerative colitis, including the impact of disease on the menstrual cycle, fertility, child bearing, sexual health, and recommendations for health care maintenance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kindra Clark-Snustad
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Program, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington, 1959 Northeast Pacific Street, Box 356424, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Madalina Butnariu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W. 10(th) Ave. 2(nd) floor, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Anita Afzali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 West 12(th) Avenue, Room 280, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ileorectal Anastomosis Versus IPAA for the Surgical Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Markov Decision Analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63:1276-1284. [PMID: 32472777 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ileorectal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis results in decreased postoperative morbidity and better functional outcome but leads to increased risk for rectal cancer compared with IPAA. OBJECTIVE This study aims to compare ileorectal anastomosis with IPAA in ulcerative colitis by using a decision model. DESIGN A Markov simulation model was designed to simulate clinical events of ileorectal anastomosis and IPAA over a time horizon of 40 years with time cycles of 1 year. All probabilities and utilities were derived from observational studies, identified after a systematic literature search using MEDLINE. Primary outcomes were life-years and quality-adjusted life-years. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. SETTINGS A decision model using Markov simulation was designed. PATIENTS The base case was a 35-year-old patient with ulcerative colitis and a relatively preserved rectum. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES The primary outcome measures were (quality-adjusted) life-years. RESULTS The model resulted in lower life-years (36.22 vs 37.02) and higher quality-adjusted life-years (33.42 vs 31.57) for ileorectal anastomosis. This was confirmed after probabilistic sensitivity analysis. The model was sensitive to the utility of ileorectal anastomosis, IPAA, and end-ileostomy. A higher proportion of patients with ileorectal anastomosis will develop rectal cancer (7.6% vs 3.2%) and 43.5% of all patients with ileorectal anastomosis will end with an ileostomy as opposed to 23.0% of all patients with IPAA. LIMITATIONS The study was limited by characteristics inherent to modeling studies, including assumptions necessary to build the model, data input based on best available but often limited evidence, and unavoidable extra- and interpolation of data. CONCLUSIONS Ileorectal anastomosis was the preferred treatment option when quality-adjusted life-years were the outcome, with higher life-years for IPAA. This model highlights that both surgical strategies are useful in patients who have ulcerative colitis with a relatively spared rectum. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B249. ANASTOMOSIS ILEORRECTAL VERSUS ANASTOMOSIS ANAL CON RESERVORIO ILEAL EN EL TRATAMIENTO QUIRÚRGICO DE LA COLITIS ULCEROSA: ANÁLISIS DE DECISIÓN DE MARKOV: Las anastomosis ileorrectales en pacientes con colitis ulcerosa se encuentran asociadas con la disminución de la morbilidad postoperatoria y un mejor resultado funcional, pero conducen a un mayor riesgo de cáncer de recto cuando se las compara con casos de confección de un reservorio íleo-anal.Comparar las anastomosis ileorrectales con la anastomosis de un reservorio íleo-anal en casos de colitis ulcerosa, utilizando un modelo de procesos de decisión.Se diseñó un modelo de proceso de Markov para simular eventos clínicos en casos de anastomosis ileorrectales y anastomosis de reservorios íleo-anales en un horizonte temporal de 40 años comprendiendo ciclos temporales de 1 año. Todas las probabilidades y utilidades se derivaron de estudios observacionales, identificados después de una búsqueda sistemática de literatura usando MEDLINE. Los resultados primarios fueron años de vida y los años ajustados a la calidad de vida. Se realizaron los análisis de sensibilidad determinada y de probabilística.Se diseñó un modelo de decisión utilizando el proceso de simulación de Markov.El caso base fue el de un paciente de 35 años con colitis ulcerosa y con un recto relativamente sano.El resultado principal fué la medida de los años de vida (con ajuste en la calidad de vida).El modelo resultó en menos años de vida (36.22 frente a 37.02) y años de vida de menor calidad (33.42 frente a 31.57) para los casos de anastomosis ileorrectales. Esto se confirmó después del análisis de sensibilidad probabilística. El modelo era sensible a la utilidad de la anastomosis ileorrectal, la anastomosis del reservorio íleo-anal y la ileostomía terminal. Una mayor proporción de pacientes con anastomosis ileorectales desarrollarán cáncer de recto (7,6% frente a 3,2%) y el 43,5% de todos los pacientes con anastomosis ileorrectales terminarán con una ileostomía en comparación con el 23,0% de todos los pacientes con un reservorio íleo-anal.El analisis estuvo limitado por las características inherentes a los estudios de modelado, incluidas las suposiciones necesarias para construir el modelo, la entrada de datos basada en la mejor evidencia disponible pero a menudo limitada y la extrapolación e interpolación inevitable de datos.Las anastomosis ileorrectales fueron la opción de tratamiento preferida cuando el resultado fue ajustado en años con calidad de vida, con años de vida más larga para la anastomosis de reservorios íleo-anales. Este modelo destaca que ambas estrategias quirúrgicas son útiles en pacientes con colitis ulcerosa con rectos relativamente sanos. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B249.
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Polyps in gastrointestinal tract are mostly benign and result from hamartomas or lymphoid hyperplasia of submucosa. They usually occur as isolated lesions in children and are referred to as juvenile polyps. Multiple polyps with inherited origin are called polyposis and can be seen as a part of the syndrome. The polyps with adenomatous histopathology have malignant potential and necessitate genetic testing and colonoscopy to define the risk of cancer. Although simple endoscopic removal is adequate in the treatment of juvenile polyps, children with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) need total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). The timing of prophylactic colectomy and the type of surgical treatment are controversial in children. The clinical features, the assessment of cancer risk, and the alternatives of the surgical treatment of polyps are reviewed in this paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tutku Soyer
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lee S, Crowe M, Seow CH, Kotze PG, Kaplan GG, Metcalfe A, Ricciuto A, Benchimol EI, Kuenzig ME. Surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Has Unclear Impact on Female Fertility: A Cochrane Collaboration Systematic Review. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol 2020; 4:115-124. [PMID: 34056529 PMCID: PMC8158647 DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwaa010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims Surgical treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may impair female fertility. We conducted a systematic review to determine the risk of infertility and pregnancy outcomes in women with IBD who underwent surgery. Methods We identified studies evaluating the impact of IBD surgery on infertility and pregnancy outcomes. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled when data were presented using contingency tables. Odds ratios (OR) were pooled when raw numbers were not provided. GRADE was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence. Results Sixteen observational studies were included, comparing women with and without surgery, open and laparoscopic surgery and before and after surgery. All studies were of low quality. The effect of surgery on infertility at 12 months (RR 5.45, 95% CI 0.41 to 72.57) was uncertain. Similarly, the fertility effects of laparoscopic versus open surgery method were unclear (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.27). The impact of IBD surgery on pregnancy outcomes should be interpreted with caution. Surgery was associated with miscarriage (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.60), use of assisted reproductive technologies (RR 25.09, 95% CI 1.56 to 403.76) and caesarean section (RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.00 to 4.95), but not with stillbirth (RR 1.96, 95% CI 0.42 to 9.18), preterm birth (RR 1.91, 95% CI 0.67 to 5.48), low birth weight (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.08 to 4.83) or small for gestational age (RR 2.54, 95% CI 0.80 to 8.01). Conclusion The effect of surgical therapy for IBD on rates of female infertility and pregnancy-related outcomes was uncertain due to poor quality of existing literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangmin Lee
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Megan Crowe
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cynthia H Seow
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Paulo G Kotze
- IBD Outpatients Clinic, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Catholic University of Paraná (PUCPR), Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Gilaad G Kaplan
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Amy Metcalfe
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Amanda Ricciuto
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric I Benchimol
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario and CHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - M Ellen Kuenzig
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario and CHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Nearly 5% of colorectal cancers are hereditary colorectal cancers, including adenomatous polyposis. The aim of this review was to highlight the current management of adenomatous polyposis. The two main genetic conditions responsible for adenomatous polyposis are familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) (caused by an autosomal dominant mutation of the APC gene) and MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) (caused by bi-allelic recessive mutations of the MUTYH (MutY human homolog) gene). FAP is characterized by the presence of >1000 polyps and a young age at diagnosis (mean age of 10). In the absence of screening, the risk of colorectal cancer at age 40 is 100%. It is recommended to start screening at the age of 10-12 years. For patients with FAP and MAP, it is also recommended to screen the upper gastrointestinal tract (stomach and duodenum). In FAP, prophylactic surgery aims to reduce the risk of death without impairment of patient quality of life. The best age for prophylactic surgery is not well-defined; in Europe, prophylactic surgery is usually performed at age 20 as the risk of cancer increases sharply during the third decade. There are three main surgical procedures employed: total colectomy with an ileorectal anastomosis, restorative coloproctectomy with a J pouch anastomosis and coloproctectomy with a stoma. Restorative coloproctectomy with J pouch anastomosis is the reference procedure; however, disease can vary in severity from one patient to another and this must be taken into account to decide which procedure should be performed. In conclusion, the management of adenomatous polyposis is complex but is well-defined by guidelines, particularly in France.
Collapse
|
24
|
Monahan KJ, Bradshaw N, Dolwani S, Desouza B, Dunlop MG, East JE, Ilyas M, Kaur A, Lalloo F, Latchford A, Rutter MD, Tomlinson I, Thomas HJW, Hill J. Guidelines for the management of hereditary colorectal cancer from the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG)/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI)/United Kingdom Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG). Gut 2020; 69:411-444. [PMID: 31780574 PMCID: PMC7034349 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 276] [Impact Index Per Article: 55.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Revised: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Heritable factors account for approximately 35% of colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, and almost 30% of the population in the UK have a family history of CRC. The quantification of an individual's lifetime risk of gastrointestinal cancer may incorporate clinical and molecular data, and depends on accurate phenotypic assessment and genetic diagnosis. In turn this may facilitate targeted risk-reducing interventions, including endoscopic surveillance, preventative surgery and chemoprophylaxis, which provide opportunities for cancer prevention. This guideline is an update from the 2010 British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (BSG/ACPGBI) guidelines for colorectal screening and surveillance in moderate and high-risk groups; however, this guideline is concerned specifically with people who have increased lifetime risk of CRC due to hereditary factors, including those with Lynch syndrome, polyposis or a family history of CRC. On this occasion we invited the UK Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG), a subgroup within the British Society of Genetic Medicine (BSGM), as a partner to BSG and ACPGBI in the multidisciplinary guideline development process. We also invited external review through the Delphi process by members of the public as well as the steering committees of the European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG) and the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). A systematic review of 10 189 publications was undertaken to develop 67 evidence and expert opinion-based recommendations for the management of hereditary CRC risk. Ten research recommendations are also prioritised to inform clinical management of people at hereditary CRC risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin J Monahan
- Family Cancer Clinic, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Nicola Bradshaw
- Clinical Genetics, West of Scotland Genetics Services, Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sunil Dolwani
- Gastroenterology, Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - Bianca Desouza
- Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - James E East
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mohammad Ilyas
- Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Nottingham University, Nottingham, UK
| | - Asha Kaur
- Head of Policy and Campaigns, Bowel Cancer UK, London, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Genetic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Matthew D Rutter
- Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, UK
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Birmingham, UK
- Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Huw J W Thomas
- Family Cancer Clinic, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - James Hill
- Genetic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Vitellaro M, Piozzi G, Signoroni S, Ricci MT, Ciniselli CM, Cardani A, Vecchi I, Mancini A, Magarotto A, Verderio P, Massimino M, Ferrari A, Biasoni D. Short-term and long-term outcomes after preventive surgery in adolescent patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2020; 67:e28110. [PMID: 31802619 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Revised: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND APC gene pathogenic variants are characterized by a lifetime risk of nearly 100% to develop a colorectal carcinoma. International guidelines suggest a prophylactic surgery in the second decade. METHODS A descriptive analysis was performed evaluating a surgical series of adolescent patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) enrolled in the prospectively maintained hereditary polyposis registry. RESULTS Thirty-eight adolescent patients (median age 16 years; range, 7-19) underwent laparoscopic prophylactic surgery. APC gene pathogenic variants were detected in all patients, and six patients were proband. No patients were converted to open surgery. Median postoperative stay was five days (4-16). Early postoperative complications were one dural puncture and one anastomotic leakage. Regarding late complications, we observed one patient having small bowel obstruction 56 months after surgery. Pathological reports showed one patient with pTis adenocarcinoma in two separate sites; 33 patients with low-grade dysplasia, four with high-grade dysplasia. One patient developed a desmoid tumor 37 months after surgery. After a median follow-up of 40.5 months, no patients died or had a second abdominal surgery because of cancer in rectal stump. CONCLUSIONS Rectal sparing surgery was the first choice in the major respect of patients' quality of life. Laparoscopic prophylactic surgery for FAP is well accepted from adolescents. It represents a safe option due to the low incidence of post-surgical desmoids and quick postoperative recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Vitellaro
- Hereditary Digestive Tract Tumors Unit, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.,Colorectal Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Piozzi
- Colorectal Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Signoroni
- Hereditary Digestive Tract Tumors Unit, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Ricci
- Hereditary Digestive Tract Tumors Unit, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Maura Ciniselli
- Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Cardani
- Department of Critical and Supportive Therapy, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Irene Vecchi
- Department of Critical and Supportive Therapy, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Mancini
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Magarotto
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Verderio
- Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Maura Massimino
- Pediatric Oncology Section, Department of Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Section, Department of Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Biasoni
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Potter DD, Moir CR, Day CN, Harmsen WS, Pemberton JH. Fertility and Sexual Function in Women Following Pediatric Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis. J Pediatr Surg 2020; 55:59-62. [PMID: 31708201 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.09.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis (IPAA) is the standard of care for children requiring surgical treatment of severe colitis or polyposis syndromes. This study aims is to investigate the sexual function and fertility in women after undergoing childhood IPAA. METHODS A prospectively maintained colon and rectal database of consenting patients was queried from January 1980 to October 2015. We included all females that replied to at least 1 survey between the ages of 20 and 45 years that had undergone IPAA younger than 20 years of age. RESULTS Two hundred females met inclusion criteria, whereas 149 women replied to the sexual function questions. Ulcerative colitis was diagnosed in 122 (83%) patients, with the remainder having polyposis. Seven patients had a laparoscopic proctectomy. Only 2 patients had a pelvic infection, whereas 21 had intestinal obstruction postoperatively. A severely restricted sex life was reported in 6 (5%) patients. Of the 93 (62%) women who attempted pregnancy, 68 (73%) became pregnant. Median age of pregnancy and IPAA was 34 (range 22-45) and 17 years (range 9-20), respectively. Medical intervention to assist fertilization was required in 14/68. A total of 29 women reported problems during pregnancy with 58/68 (88%) giving birth to a live baby. Elective termination was reported in 2/68 surveys. Vaginal delivery occurred in 26/58 mothers with 27/58 planned and 9/58 unplanned cesarean sections. Age at IPAA, diagnosis, procedure type, pelvic infection, and obstruction were not associated with decreased fertility. All 7 patients operated laparoscopically have become pregnant. Change in pouch function after delivery was reported in 20/68 (32%, 5 missing) surveys. CONCLUSIONS 73% of women who desired children become pregnant, and 88% had a successful delivery after pediatric IPAA. Only 5% reported severely restricted sexual function. Changes in pouch function occurred with pregnancy and persisted in 1/3 after delivery. Minimally invasive techniques may improve fertility rates but equire continued follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV. TYPE OF STUDY Observational study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Dean Potter
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| | | | - Courtney N Day
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - W Scott Harmsen
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - John H Pemberton
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ardoino I, Signoroni S, Malvicini E, Ricci MT, Biganzoli EM, Bertario L, Occhionorelli S, Vitellaro M. Long-term survival between total colectomy versus proctocolectomy in patients with FAP: a registry-based, observational cohort study. TUMORI JOURNAL 2019; 106:139-148. [DOI: 10.1177/0300891619868019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Background: The best surgical choice for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is still debated. No prospective trials have been carried out to evaluate the pros and cons of the recommended procedures: total colectomy (ileorectal anastomosis [IRA]) vs restorative proctocolectomy (ileal pouch–anal anastomosis [IPAA]). The aim of this study was to provide a basis for tailored precision surgery in patients with FAP. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with FAP who underwent surgery and were registered in a dedicated database in Milan, Italy. Twenty-year survival related to surgical approach and prognostic factors were investigated using a Cox regression model. Results: A total of 925 patients underwent surgery between 1947 and 2015: 340 (36.8%) IPAA and 585 (63.2%) IRA. Colorectal cancer (CRC) at surgery was diagnosed in 28.6% of patients and a pathogenic APC variant was identified in 88%. During a median follow-up of 129 months, 150 patients died. The survival probability was significantly higher in the IRA than the IPAA group: 0.82 vs 0.75 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42–0.84). Multivariable regression modeling adjusted for propensity scores showed a similar difference, although no longer significant. Multivariable analysis indicated as independent risk factors CRC (HR 4.68, 95% CI 3.04–7.20) and age at surgery (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02–1.06). Among patients without cancer, the main risk factor for shorter survival was older age (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04–1.09). Conclusion: The study confirms excellent long-term results of surgical approaches with IRA and IPAA, suggesting that the best surgical choice may be an individually and clinically tailored approach, preferably at a young age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Ardoino
- Department of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Unit of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Bioinformatics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Signoroni
- Unit of Hereditary Digestive Tract Tumors, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Enzo Malvicini
- Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara and S. Anna University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Ricci
- Unit of Hereditary Digestive Tract Tumors, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Elia M. Biganzoli
- Unit of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Bioinformatics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Lucio Bertario
- Unit of Hereditary Digestive Tract Tumors, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Savino Occhionorelli
- Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara and S. Anna University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Marco Vitellaro
- Unit of Hereditary Digestive Tract Tumors, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ng KS, Gonsalves SJ, Sagar PM. Ileal-anal pouches: A review of its history, indications, and complications. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25:4320-4342. [PMID: 31496616 PMCID: PMC6710180 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Revised: 03/12/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has revolutionised the surgical management of ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Despite refinement in surgical technique(s) and patient selection, IPAA can be associated with significant morbidity. As the IPAA celebrated its 40th anniversary in 2018, this review provides a timely outline of its history, indications, and complications. IPAA has undergone significant modification since 1978. For both UC and FAP, IPAA surgery aims to definitively cure disease and prevent malignant degeneration, while providing adequate continence and avoiding a permanent stoma. The majority of patients experience long-term success, but “early” and “late” complications are recognised. Pelvic sepsis is a common early complication with far-reaching consequences of long-term pouch dysfunction, but prompt intervention (either radiological or surgical) reduces the risk of pouch failure. Even in the absence of sepsis, pouch dysfunction is a long-term complication that may have a myriad of causes. Pouchitis is a common cause that remains incompletely understood and difficult to manage at times. 10% of patients succumb to the diagnosis of pouch failure, which is traditionally associated with the need for pouch excision. This review provides a timely outline of the history, indications, and complications associated with IPAA. Patient selection remains key, and contraindications exist for this surgery. A structured management plan is vital to the successful management of complications following pouch surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kheng-Seong Ng
- John Goligher Colorectal Unit, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
- Institute of Academic Surgery, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales 2050, Australia
| | - Simon Joseph Gonsalves
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust, Huddersfield HD3 3EA, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Michael Sagar
- John Goligher Colorectal Unit, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lee S, Crowe M, Seow CH, Kotze PG, Kaplan GG, Metcalfe A, Ricciuto A, Benchimol EI, Kuenzig ME. The impact of surgical therapies for inflammatory bowel disease on female fertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 7:CD012711. [PMID: 31334846 PMCID: PMC6647933 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012711.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may require surgery, which may result in higher risk of infertility. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal anal pouch anastomosis (IPAA) may increase infertility, but the degree to which IPAA affects infertility remains unclear, and the impact of other surgical interventions on infertility is unknown. OBJECTIVES Primary objective• To determine the effects of surgical interventions for IBD on female infertility.Secondary objectives• To evaluate the impact of surgical interventions on the need for assisted reproductive technology (ART), time to pregnancy, miscarriage, stillbirth, prematurity, mode of delivery (spontaneous vaginal, instrumental vaginal, or Caesarean section), infant requirement for resuscitation and neonatal intensive care, low and very low birth weight, small for gestational age, antenatal and postpartum hemorrhage, retained placenta, postpartum depression, gestational diabetes, and gestational hypertension/preeclampsia. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane IBD Group Specialized Register from inception to September 27, 2018, to identify relevant studies. We also searched references of relevant articles, conference abstracts, grey literature, and trials registers. SELECTION CRITERIA We included observational studies that compared women of reproductive age (≥ 12 years of age) who underwent surgery to women with IBD who had a different type of surgery or no surgery (i.e. treated medically). We also included studies comparing women before and after surgery. Any type of IBD-related surgery was permitted. Infertility was defined as an inability to become pregnant following 12 months of unprotected intercourse. Infertility at 6, 18, and 24 months was included as a secondary outcome. We excluded studies that included women without IBD and those comparing women with IBD to women without IBD.. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened studies and extracted data. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess bias and GRADE to assess the overall certainty of evidence. We calculated the pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using random-effects models. When individual studies reported odds ratios (ORs) and did not provide raw numbers, we pooled ORs instead. MAIN RESULTS We identified 16 observational studies for inclusion. Ten studies were included in meta-analyses, of which nine compared women with and without a previous IBD-related surgery and the other compared women with open and laparoscopic IPAA. Of the ten studies included in meta-analyses, four evaluated infertility, one evaluated ART, and seven reported on pregnancy-related outcomes. Seven studies in which women were compared before and after colectomy and/or IPAA were summarized qualitatively, of which five included a comparison of infertility, three included the use of ART, and three included other pregnancy-related outcomes. One study included a comparison of women with and without IPAA, as well as before and after IPAA, and was therefore included in both the meta-analysis and the qualitative summary. All studies were at high risk of bias for at least two domains.We are very uncertain of the effect of IBD surgery on infertility at 12 months (RR 5.45, 95% CI 0.41 to 72.57; 114 participants; 2 studies) and at 24 months (RR 3.59, 95% CI 1.32 to 9.73; 190 participants; 1 study). Infertility was lower in women who received laparoscopic surgery compared to open restorative proctocolectomy at 12 months (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.27; 37 participants; 1 study).We are very uncertain of the effect of IBD surgery on pregnancy-related outcomes, including miscarriage (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.60; 776 pregnancies; 5 studies), use of ART (RR 25.09, 95% CI 1.56 to 403.76; 106 participants; 1 study), delivery via Caesarean section (RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.00 to 4.95; 20 pregnancies; 1 study), stillbirth (RR 1.96, 95% CI 0.42 to 9.18; 246 pregnancies; 3 studies), preterm birth (RR 1.91, 95% CI 0.67 to 5.48; 194 pregnancies; 3 studies), low birth weight (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.08 to 4.83), and small for gestational age (RR 2.54, 95% CI 0.80 to 8.01; 65 pregnancies; 1 study).Studies comparing infertility before and after IBD-related surgery reported numerically higher rates of infertility at six months (before: 1/5, 20.0%; after: 9/15, 60.0%; 1 study), at 12 months (before: 68/327, 20.8%; after: 239/377, 63.4%; 5 studies), and at 24 months (before: 14/89, 15.7%; after: 115/164, 70.1%; 2 studies); use of ART (before: 5.3% to 42.2%; after: 30.3% to 34.3%; proportions varied across studies due to differences in which women were identified as at risk of using ART); and delivery via Caesarean section (before: 8/73, 11.0%; after: 36/75, 48.0%; 2 studies). In addition, women had a longer time to conception after surgery (two to five months; 2 studies) than before surgery (5 to 16 months; 2 studies). The proportions of women experiencing miscarriage (before: 19/123, 15.4%; after: 21/134, 15.7%; 3 studies) and stillbirth (before: 2/38, 5.3%; after: 3/80: 3.8%; 2 studies) were similar before and after surgery. Fewer women experienced gestational diabetes after surgery (before: 3/37, 8.1%; after: 0/37; 1 study), and the risk of preeclampsia was similar before and after surgery (before: 2/37, 5.4%; after: 0/37; 1 study). We are very uncertain of the effects of IBD-related surgery on these outcomes due to poor quality evidence, including confounding bias due to increased age of women after surgery.We rated evidence for all outcomes and comparisons as very low quality due to the observational nature of the data, inclusion of small studies with imprecise estimates, and high risk of bias among included studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The effect of surgical therapy for IBD on female infertility is uncertain. It is also uncertain if there are any differences in infertility among those undergoing open versus laparoscopic procedures. Previous surgery was associated with higher risk of miscarriage, use of ART, Caesarean section delivery, and giving birth to a low birth weight infant, but was not associated with risk of stillbirth, preterm delivery, or delivery of a small for gestational age infant. These findings are based on very low-quality evidence. As a result, definitive conclusions cannot be made, and future well-designed studies are needed to fully understand the impact of surgery on infertility and pregnancy outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangmin Lee
- University of CalgaryCommunity Health SciencesCalgaryABCanada
| | - Megan Crowe
- University of OttawaSchool of Epidemiology and Public HealthOttawaONCanada
| | - Cynthia H Seow
- University of CalgaryDepartment of MedicineTRW Building Rm 6D183280 Hospital Drive NWCalgaryABCanadaT2N 4Z6
| | - Paulo G Kotze
- Catholic University of Paraná (PUCPR)IBD Outpatients Clinic, Colorectal Surgery UnitCuritibaBrazil
| | - Gilaad G Kaplan
- University of CalgaryDepartment of MedicineTRW Building Rm 6D183280 Hospital Drive NWCalgaryABCanadaT2N 4Z6
| | - Amy Metcalfe
- University of CalgaryDepartment of Obstetrics & GynecologyCalgaryAlbertaCanada
| | - Amanda Ricciuto
- The Hospital for Sick ChildrenDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & NutritionTorontoONCanada
| | - Eric I Benchimol
- The Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioDivision of Gastroenterology Hepatology & Nutrition401 Smyth RoadOttawaONCanadaK1H 8L1
- University of OttawaDepartment of PediatricsOttawaONCanada
| | - M Ellen Kuenzig
- The Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioDivision of Gastroenterology Hepatology & Nutrition401 Smyth RoadOttawaONCanadaK1H 8L1
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Colonic Surgery in Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 2019; 62:781-785. [PMID: 31188177 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
A 34-year-old woman is referred after a colonoscopy that revealed >100 polyps throughout her colon and rectum (). A random selection of 3 polyps is biopsied and reported as adenomas. She is adopted and is unaware of her biological family. She is found to have a deleterious germline variant in APC (c.1967-1974del). She works as a nurse and is married with 4 children (age: 17, 13, 11, and 6 years). She has had no prior abdominal operations.
Collapse
|
31
|
Recent Advances in Fertility Preservation and Counseling for Reproductive-Aged Women with Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review. Dis Colon Rectum 2019; 62:762-771. [PMID: 30730458 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of colorectal cancer among reproductive-aged women is increasing. Concerns regarding future fertility are secondary only to concerns regarding survival and may significantly impact quality of life among reproductive-aged female cancer survivors. Fertility preservation counseling reduces long-term regret and dissatisfaction among cancer survivors. Health care providers counseling patients with colorectal cancer must understand the impact of cancer treatment on future reproductive potential. OBJECTIVE This review aims to examine the effects that colorectal cancer treatments have on female fertility and summarize existing and emerging options for fertility preservation. DATA SOURCES EMBASE, National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE)/PubMed, Cochrane Review Library were the data sources for this review. STUDY SELECTION A systematic literature review was performed using exploded MeSH terms to identify articles examining the effect of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, as well as fertility preservation options for colorectal cancer on female fertility. Relevant studies were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the effect of colorectal cancer treatment on fertility. RESULTS There are limited data regarding the impact of colorectal surgery on fertility. The gonadotoxic effects of chemotherapy on reproductive capacity depend on age at the time of chemotherapy administration, cumulative chemotherapy, radiation dose, type of agent, and baseline fertility status. Chemotherapy-induced risks for colorectal cancers are considered low to moderate, whereas pelvic radiation with a dose of 45 to 50 Gray induces premature menopause in greater than 90% of patients. Ovarian transposition may reduce but not eliminate the damaging effect of radiation on the ovaries. Embryo and oocyte cryopreservation are considered standard of care for women desiring fertility preservation, with oocyte cryopreservation no longer being considered experimental. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation remains experimental but may be an option for select patients. The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists remains controversial and has not been definitively shown to preserve fertility. LIMITATIONS The limitations of this review are the lack of randomized controlled trials and high-quality studies, as well as the small sample sizes and the use of surrogate fertility markers. CONCLUSION Reproductive-aged women with colorectal cancer benefit from fertility preservation counseling before the initiation of cancer treatment.
Collapse
|
32
|
Management of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in Children and Adolescents: Position Paper From the ESPGHAN Polyposis Working Group. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2019; 68:428-441. [PMID: 30585891 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000002247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a well-described inherited syndrome, characterized by the development of hundreds to thousands of adenomas in the colorectum, with implications in children and adolescents. Almost all adult patients will develop colorectal cancer if they are not identified and treated early enough. Identifying and screening for FAP commences in adolescence. The syndrome is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait and caused by mutations in the adenomatous polyposis (APC) gene. This European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) position paper provides a guide for diagnosis, assessment, and management of FAP in children and adolescents.This is the first position paper regarding FAP published by ESPGHAN. Literature from PubMed, Medline, and Embase was reviewed and in the absence of evidence, recommendations reflect the opinion of paediatric and adult experts involved in the care of polyposis syndromes. Because many of the studies that form the basis for the recommendations were descriptive and/or retrospective in nature, these of the recommendations are supported on expert opinion. This position paper will instruct on the appropriate management and timing of procedures in children and adolescents with FAP.
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal dominant genetic disease with a high tendency to develop colorectal cancer. The timing and choice of preventive surgical interventions should be based on the number, size and severity of adenomas, combined with a variety of considerations, in order to effectively prevent cancer and make patients easy to accept. Total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) procedure, which could minimize the residual rectal mucosa and reduce the risk of adenoma recurrence, has become the first choice for patients with FAP. Besides, laparoscopic IPAA has obvious advantages such as cosmetic appearance, quick recovery, little adhesion and high pregnancy rate. Patients with FAP should be managed by experienced surgeons working in specialized medical centers in order to get the most reasonable treatment at the best time and achieve long-term effective outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai-Yu Li
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China
| | - Gang Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
A Decision Analysis for Rectal-Sparing Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: Total Colectomy With Ileorectal Anastomosis Versus Proctocolectomy With IPAA. Dis Colon Rectum 2019; 62:27-32. [PMID: 30394986 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are different approaches for the surgical management of rectal-sparing familial adenomatous polyposis with variable impacts on both quality of life and survival. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to quantify the trade-offs between total proctocolectomy with IPAA versus total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis using decision analysis. DESIGN We created a disease simulation Markov model to simulate the clinical events after IPAA and ileorectal anastomosis for rectal-sparing familial adenomatous polyposis in a cohort of individuals at the age 30 years. We used available literature to obtain different transition probabilities and health-states utilities. The output parameters were quality-adjusted life-years and life-years. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. SETTINGS A decision analysis using a Markov model was conducted at a single center. PATIENTS Patients with rectal-sparing familial adenomatous polyposis at age 30 years were included. Rectal-sparing familial adenomatous polyposis is defined as the presence of 0 to 20 polyps that can be removed endoscopically. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Quality-adjusted life-years were measured. RESULTS Our model showed that the mean quality-adjusted life-years for IPAA was 25.12 and for ileorectal anastomosis was 27.12 in base-case analysis. Mean life-years for IPAA were 28.81 and 28.28 for ileorectal anastomosis. A 1-way sensitivity analysis was performed for all of the parameters in the model. None of the deterministic sensitivity analyses changed the model results across the range of plausible values. Probabilistic analysis identified that, in 86.9% of scenarios, ileorectal anastomosis had improved quality-adjusted life-years compared with IPAA. LIMITATIONS The study was limited by characteristics inherent to modeling studies. CONCLUSIONS Ileorectal anastomosis was found to be preferable for patients with rectal-sparing familial adenomatous polyposis when quality of life is taken into consideration. This model was robust based on both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. These data should be taken into consideration when counseling patients regarding a surgical approach in rectal-sparing familial adenomatous polyposis. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A715.
Collapse
|
35
|
Challenging management of familial adenomatous polyposis with advanced colorectal cancer: laparoscopic partial resection and cold snare polypectomy. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7:E49-E52. [PMID: 30648139 PMCID: PMC6327744 DOI: 10.1055/a-0677-1845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Prophylactic extended colectomy may be indicated because most surgically untreated patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) develop colorectal cancer (CRC) in their lifetime. However, some patients refuse to undergo surgery to avoid degradation of their quality of life. We report that FAP is controllable with laparoscopic partial resection and postoperative polypectomy even when complicated by advanced CRC. We also discuss the utility of cold snare polypectomy for resection of polyps.
Collapse
|
36
|
Landerholm K, Wood C, Bloemendaal A, Buchs N, George B, Guy R. The rectal remnant after total colectomy for colitis - intra-operative,post-operative and longer-term considerations. Scand J Gastroenterol 2018; 53:1443-1452. [PMID: 30451043 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1529195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Acute severe colitis requires surgery in around 30% of the cases. Total colectomy with ileostomy is the standard procedure with distinct advantages to a laparoscopic approach. Less agreement exists regarding the formation or configuration of the retained rectal stump and its short-term and long-term management. In this review, aspects of management of the rectal remnant, including perioperative considerations, potential complications, medical treatment, surveillance and implications for proctectomy and reconstructive surgery are explored. METHODS A thorough literature review exploring the PubMed and EMBASE databases was undertaken to clarify the evidence base surrounding areas of controversy in the surgical approach to acute severe colitis. In particular, focus was given to evidence surrounding management of the rectal remnant. RESULTS There is a paucity of high quality evidence for optimal management of the rectal stump following colectomy, and randomised trials are lacking. Establishment of laparoscopic colectomy has been associated with distinct advantages as well as the emergence of unique considerations, including those specific to rectal remnant management. CONCLUSIONS Early surgical involvement and a multidisciplinary approach to the management of acute severe colitis are advocated. Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy and ileostomy should be the operation of choice, with division of the rectum at the pelvic brim leaving a closed intraperitoneal remnant. If the rectum is severely inflamed, a mucus fistula may be useful, and an indwelling rectal catheter is probably advantageous to reduce the complications associated with stump dehiscence. Patients electing not to proceed to proctectomy should undergo surveillance for dysplasia of the rectum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalle Landerholm
- a Department of Colorectal Surgery , Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , Oxford , UK
| | - Christopher Wood
- a Department of Colorectal Surgery , Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , Oxford , UK
| | - Alexander Bloemendaal
- a Department of Colorectal Surgery , Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , Oxford , UK
| | - Nicolas Buchs
- a Department of Colorectal Surgery , Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , Oxford , UK
| | - Bruce George
- a Department of Colorectal Surgery , Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , Oxford , UK
| | - Richard Guy
- a Department of Colorectal Surgery , Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , Oxford , UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Brown SR, Fearnhead NS, Faiz OD, Abercrombie JF, Acheson AG, Arnott RG, Clark SK, Clifford S, Davies RJ, Davies MM, Douie WJP, Dunlop MG, Epstein JC, Evans MD, George BD, Guy RJ, Hargest R, Hawthorne AB, Hill J, Hughes GW, Limdi JK, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, O'Connell PR, Pinkney TD, Pipe J, Sagar PM, Singh B, Soop M, Terry H, Torkington J, Verjee A, Walsh CJ, Warusavitarne JH, Williams AB, Williams GL, Wilson RG. The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20 Suppl 8:3-117. [PMID: 30508274 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
AIM There is a requirement of an expansive and up to date review of surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that can dovetail with the medical guidelines produced by the British Society of Gastroenterology. METHODS Surgeons who are members of the ACPGBI with a recognised interest in IBD were invited to contribute various sections of the guidelines. They were directed to produce a procedure based document using literature searches that were systematic, comprehensible, transparent and reproducible. Levels of evidence were graded. An editorial board was convened to ensure consistency of style, presentation and quality. Each author was asked to provide a set of recommendations which were evidence based and unambiguous. These recommendations were submitted to the whole guideline group and scored. They were then refined and submitted to a second vote. Only those that achieved >80% consensus at level 5 (strongly agree) or level 4 (agree) after 2 votes were included in the guidelines. RESULTS All aspects of surgical care for IBD have been included along with 157 recommendations for management. CONCLUSION These guidelines provide an up to date and evidence based summary of the current surgical knowledge in the management of IBD and will serve as a useful practical text for clinicians performing this type of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S R Brown
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - N S Fearnhead
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - O D Faiz
- St Mark's Hospital, Middlesex, Harrow, UK
| | | | - A G Acheson
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - R G Arnott
- Patient Liaison Group, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - S K Clark
- St Mark's Hospital, Middlesex, Harrow, UK
| | | | - R J Davies
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - M M Davies
- University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - W J P Douie
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | | | - J C Epstein
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - M D Evans
- Morriston Hospital, Morriston, Swansea, UK
| | - B D George
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - R J Guy
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - R Hargest
- University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - J Hill
- Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - G W Hughes
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - J K Limdi
- The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - T D Pinkney
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Pipe
- Patient Liaison Group, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - P M Sagar
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - B Singh
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - M Soop
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - H Terry
- Crohn's and Colitis UK, St Albans, UK
| | | | - A Verjee
- Patient Liaison Group, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - C J Walsh
- Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Arrowe Park Hospital, Upton, UK
| | | | - A B Williams
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Sarvepalli S, Burke CA, Monachese M, Leach BH, Laguardia L, O'Malley M, Kalady MF, Church JM. Natural history of colonic polyposis in young patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 88:726-733. [PMID: 29864420 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2018] [Accepted: 05/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Proctocolectomy prevents colorectal cancer in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Colorectal polyp progression is one of the indications for surgery. No data exist regarding the natural history of colorectal polyposis in young patients with FAP. This study examined the rate of polyposis progression and factors associated with it. METHODS Patients with FAP <30 years old who had undergone ≥2 colonoscopies since 2000 were identified. Rate of polyposis progression was calculated by review of polyp counts obtained from baseline and last colonoscopy, accounting for any polyps removed during the observation period. Endoscopic and non-endoscopic factors affecting the rate of polyposis progression were evaluated. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with rate of polyposis progression. RESULTS One hundred sixty-eight patients (52% female; median age, 13.5 years) were included. Median rate of polyposis progression was 25.4 polyps/year (interquartile range, 9.5-69.8). Highest median rate of polyposis progression (89 polyps/year) was associated with mutation in codon 1309. The rate of polyposis progression was independently associated with the location of mutation in the adenomatous polyposis coli gene, the number of polyps at the initial colonoscopy, and exposure to chemoprevention. Of the 39.9% of patients who underwent surgery, an increase in polyp number was the most common indication (53.7%). CONCLUSIONS The rate of polyposis progression in young patients with FAP varies with a median of about 25 new polyps per year. Progression is associated with distinct factors, which can be used in discussion with patients regarding the need for and timing of prophylactic colorectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shashank Sarvepalli
- Department of Hospital Medicine, Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Carol A Burke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Department of Colorectal Surgery; Digestive Disease and Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Sanford R. Weiss, MD, Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Marc Monachese
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Brandie H Leach
- Department of Colorectal Surgery; Digestive Disease and Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Sanford R. Weiss, MD, Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Lisa Laguardia
- Sanford R. Weiss, MD, Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Margaret O'Malley
- Sanford R. Weiss, MD, Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Matthew F Kalady
- Department of Colorectal Surgery; Digestive Disease and Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Sanford R. Weiss, MD, Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - James M Church
- Department of Colorectal Surgery; Digestive Disease and Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Sanford R. Weiss, MD, Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gastro-intestinal surgery and fertility. J Visc Surg 2018; 155 Suppl 1:S49-S55. [PMID: 29857942 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2018.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
In France, 10 to 15% of couples in the overall population have a fertility problem. Preservation of sexual and reproductive function should be a major concern for all patients capable of procreation who undergo treatment for gastro-intestinal disease. The gastro-intestinal diseases most often responsible for fertility disorders include chronic inflammatory diseases, intestinal cancer and hereditary diseases, such as the Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis. Obesity is responsible for a 20% loss of fertility but the effects of bariatric surgery on fertility are controversial. Nonetheless, in the light of progress in surgical techniques and better knowledge of gastro-intestinal disease the negative impact of surgery on fertility warrants attention. Effectively, fertility can be preserved after certain major gastro-intestinal operations such as cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal chemotherapy, total coloprotectomy with ileo-anal anastomosis and rectosigmoid resection, as long as the patient's age permits and resection of the reproductive organs is not necessary.
Collapse
|
40
|
Ishida H, Yamaguchi T, Tanakaya K, Akagi K, Inoue Y, Kumamoto K, Shimodaira H, Sekine S, Tanaka T, Chino A, Tomita N, Nakajima T, Hasegawa H, Hinoi T, Hirasawa A, Miyakura Y, Murakami Y, Muro K, Ajioka Y, Hashiguchi Y, Ito Y, Saito Y, Hamaguchi T, Ishiguro M, Ishihara S, Kanemitsu Y, Kawano H, Kinugasa Y, Kokudo N, Murofushi K, Nakajima T, Oka S, Sakai Y, Tsuji A, Uehara K, Ueno H, Yamazaki K, Yoshida M, Yoshino T, Boku N, Fujimori T, Itabashi M, Koinuma N, Morita T, Nishimura G, Sakata Y, Shimada Y, Takahashi K, Tanaka S, Tsuruta O, Yamaguchi T, Sugihara K, Watanabe T. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) Guidelines 2016 for the Clinical Practice of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer (Translated Version). J Anus Rectum Colon 2018; 2:S1-S51. [PMID: 31773066 PMCID: PMC6849642 DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2017-028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2017] [Accepted: 09/15/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Hereditary colorectal cancer accounts for less than 5% of all colorectal cancer cases. Some of the unique characteristics that are commonly encountered in cases of hereditary colorectal cancer include early age at onset, synchronous/metachronous occurrence of the cancer, and association with multiple cancers in other organs, necessitating different management from sporadic colorectal cancer. While the diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis might be easy because usually 100 or more adenomas that develop in the colonic mucosa are in this condition, Lynch syndrome, which is the most commonly associated disease with hereditary colorectal cancer, is often missed in daily medical practice because of its relatively poorly defined clinical characteristics. In addition, the disease concept and diagnostic criteria for Lynch syndrome, which was once called hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, have changed over time with continual research, thereby possibly creating confusion in clinical practice. Under these circumstances, the JSCCR Guideline Committee has developed the "JSCCR Guidelines 2016 for the Clinical Practice of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer (HCRC)," to allow delivery of appropriate medical care in daily practice to patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, Lynch syndrome, or other related diseases. The JSCCR Guidelines 2016 for HCRC were prepared by consensus reached among members of the JSCCR Guideline Committee, based on a careful review of the evidence retrieved from literature searches, and considering the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice settings in Japan. Herein, we present the English version of the JSCCR Guidelines 2016 for HCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideyuki Ishida
- Department of Digestive Tract and General Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitma Medical University, Kawagoe, Japan
| | - Tatsuro Yamaguchi
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kohji Tanakaya
- Department of Surgery, Iwakuni Clinical Center, Iwakuni, Japan
| | - Kiwamu Akagi
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Molecular Genetics, Saitama Prefectural Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Inoue
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Division of Reparative Medicine, Institute of Life Sciences, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan
| | - Kensuke Kumamoto
- Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, Aizuwakamatsu, Japan
| | - Hideki Shimodaira
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
| | - Shigeki Sekine
- Division of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, National Cancer Center, Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Tanaka
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akiko Chino
- Division of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naohiro Tomita
- Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Takeshi Nakajima
- Endoscopy Division/Department of Genetic Medicine and Service, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Takao Hinoi
- Department of Surgery, Institute for Clinical Research, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Japan
| | - Akira Hirasawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Miyakura
- Department of Surgery Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yoshie Murakami
- Department of Oncology Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kei Muro
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yoichi Ajioka
- Division of Molecular and Diagnostic Pathology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | | | - Yoshinori Ito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yutaka Saito
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Hamaguchi
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Megumi Ishiguro
- Department of Translational Oncology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Soichiro Ishihara
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yukihide Kanemitsu
- Colorectal Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kawano
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Mary's Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yusuke Kinugasa
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Norihiro Kokudo
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Division, Artificial Organ and Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiko Murofushi
- Radiation Oncology Department, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takako Nakajima
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Shiro Oka
- Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | | | - Akihiko Tsuji
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Japan
| | - Keisuke Uehara
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hideki Ueno
- Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kentaro Yamazaki
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Masahiro Yoshida
- Department of Hemodialysis and Surgery, Chemotherapy Research Institute, International University of Health and Welfare, Ichikawa, Japan
| | - Takayuki Yoshino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Narikazu Boku
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Michio Itabashi
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuo Koinuma
- Department of Health Administration and Policy, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan
| | - Takayuki Morita
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center, Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital, Aomori, Japan
| | - Genichi Nishimura
- Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Kanazawa Hospital, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - Yuh Sakata
- CEO, Misawa City Hospital, Misawa, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Shimada
- Division of Clinical Oncology, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi, Japan
| | - Keiichi Takahashi
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinji Tanaka
- Department of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Osamu Tsuruta
- Division of GI Endoscopy, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Toshiharu Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Toshiaki Watanabe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Takeshita E, Enomoto T, Saida Y. Alternative treatments for prophylaxis of colorectal cancer in familial adenomatous polyposis. JOURNAL OF THE ANUS RECTUM AND COLON 2018; 1:74-77. [PMID: 31583304 PMCID: PMC6768673 DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2017-007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Accepted: 04/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a rare, hereditary disease characterized by the presence of 100 or more adenomas distributed throughout the colon and rectum. If untreated, colorectal cancer develops in almost 100% of FAP patients. As prophylactic treatment, proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis remains the surgical treatment of choice. High rates of postoperative complications, however, have been reported with this procedure, including bowel dysfunction, incontinence, and reduced female fecundity. Some novel strategies for preventing hereditary colon cancers have been reported. This review summarizes alternative treatments, including the laparoscopic approach, chemoprevention, endoscopic management, and subtotal colectomy combined with endoscopic treatment, for prophylaxis of colorectal cancer in FAP patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emiko Takeshita
- Department of Surgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Enomoto
- Department of Surgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihisa Saida
- Department of Surgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Segelman J, Mattsson I, Jung B, Nilsson PJ, Palmer G, Buchli C. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage following ileosigmoid or ileorectal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20:304-311. [PMID: 29059489 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM Reconstruction with an ileosigmoidal anastomosis (ISA) or ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) is a surgical option after a subtotal colectomy. Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a problematic complication and high rates have been reported, but there is limited understanding of the risk factors involved. The aim of this study was to assess the established and potential predictors of AL following ISA and IRA. METHOD This was a retrospective cohort study including all patients who had undergone ISA or IRA at three Swedish referral centres for colorectal surgery between January 2007 and March 2015. Data regarding clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome were collected from medical records. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the association between patient and treatment related factors and the cumulative incidence of AL. RESULTS In total, 227 patients were included. Overall, AL was detected amongst 30 patients (13.2%). Amongst patients undergoing colectomy with synchronous ISA or IRA (one-stage procedure), AL occurred in 23 out of 120 (19.2%) compared with seven out of 107 (6.5%) after stoma reversal with ISA or IRA (two-stage procedure) (P = 0.004). In addition, the multivariate analyses revealed a statistically significantly lower odds ratio for AL following a two-stage procedure (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.03-0.41, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This study confirms high rates of AL following ISA and IRA. In particular, a synchronous procedure with colectomy and ISA/IRA carries a high risk of AL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Segelman
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - I Mattsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - B Jung
- Department of Surgery and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - P J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - G Palmer
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C Buchli
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Colorectal adenomatous polyposis syndromes encompass a diverse group of disorders with varying modes of inheritance and penetrance. Children may present with overt disease or within screening programs for families at high risk. We provide an overview of the array of pediatric polyposis syndromes, current screening recommendations, and surgical indications and technical considerations. Optimal disease management for these pediatric patients is still evolving and has implications for screening, surveillance, pediatric surgical management, and transition of care gastroenterologic neoplasia physicians and surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aodhnait S Fahy
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Christopher R Moir
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
The ileoanal pouch has become the standard restorative procedure of choice for patients with the classical phenotype in FAP (familial adenomatous polyposis) and also for ulcerative colitis (UC). Whilst we tend to encounter descriptive analyses comparing functional outcome, fertility and quality of life (QOL) between series in literature, there may be an urgent need to discuss the subtle technical modifications that may be pivotal for improving long-term QOL in FAP patients. Our aim is to review the current literature and discuss the aspects of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis that may require specific reevaluation for FAP. Surgical strategies aimed at minimizing post-interventional desmoid growth is one of the most important aspects. For this study, the following topics of interest were selected: Timing of surgery, IRA or ileoanal pouch for classical FAP, laparoscopic or conventional surgery, TME or mesenteric dissection, preservation of the ileocolic vessels, handsewn or double-staple anastomosis, shape and size of pouch, protective ileostomy, Last and definitely not least: how to manage desmoid plaques or desmoids at the time of prophylactic surgery. For the depicted technicalities of the procedure, a review of recent literature was performed and evaluated. For the topics selected, only sparse reference in literature was identified that was focused on the specific condition situation of FAP. Almost all pouch literature focusses on the procedural aspects, and FAP patients are always a very minor number. Therefore it becomes obvious that the specific entity is not adequately taken into account. This is a serious bias for identification of important steps in the procedure that may be beneficial for patients with either of the diseases. The results of this study demonstrate that several technical differences for construction of ileoanal pouches in FAP patients deserve more attention and prospective evaluation-perhaps even randomized trials. The role, importance and potential benefit or deterioration of outcome in most of the discussed technicalities remains unclear to date. Significant differences between the underlying diseases (UC and FAP) have not been taken into consideration, such as specifically the management of precursor desmoid lesions at the time of prophylactic surgery as well as prevention of desmoid tumors. Several of the aspects discussed in this paper should be prospectively evaluated in larger and exclusive series of FAP patients.
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
Awareness of hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes is important to facilitate their identification because affected patients are at increased risk for early onset, synchronous, and metachronous colorectal malignancies, and certain extracolonic malignancies depending on the syndrome. Identification of an affected individual allows for screening and early interventions for patients and their at-risk kindred. Genetic counseling and testing is important to the care of these patients. As knowledge of the genetic basis of these syndromes grows, unique genotype-phenotype profiles allow clinicians to tailor surveillance and treatment strategies based on individual risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katerina Wells
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, 3409 Worth Street, Suite 640, Dallas, TX 75246, USA
| | - Paul E Wise
- Division of General Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University Inherited Colorectal Cancer and Polyposis Registry, Washington University General Surgery Residency, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8109, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abdalla M, Landerholm K, Andersson P, Andersson RE, Myrelid P. Risk of Rectal Cancer After Colectomy for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A National Cohort Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 15:1055-1060.e2. [PMID: 28013111 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.11.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2016] [Revised: 09/19/2016] [Accepted: 11/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have an increased risk of rectal cancer, therefore reconstruction with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) generally is preferred to an ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) after subtotal colectomy. Similarly, completion proctectomy is recommended for patients with ileostomy and a diverted rectum, although this approach has been questioned because anti-inflammatory agents might reduce cancer risk. We performed a national cohort study in Sweden to assess the risk of rectal cancer in patients with UC who have an IRA, IPAA, or diverted rectum after subtotal colectomy. METHODS We collected data from the Swedish National Patient Register for a cohort of 5886 patients with UC who underwent subtotal colectomy with an IRA, IPAA, or diverted rectum from 1964 through 2010. Patients who developed rectal cancer were identified from the Swedish National Cancer Register. The risk of rectal cancer was compared between this cohort and the general population by standardized incidence ratio analysis. RESULTS Rectal cancer occurred in 20 of 1112 patients (1.8%) who received IRA, 1 of 1796 patients (0.06%) who received an IPAA, and 25 of 4358 patients (0.6%) with a diverted rectum. Standardized incidence ratios for rectal cancer were 8.7 in patients with an IRA, 0.4 in patients with an IPAA, and 3.8 in patients with a diverted rectum. Risk factors for rectal cancer were primary sclerosing cholangitis in patients with an IRA (hazard ratio, 6.12), and colonic severe dysplasia or cancer before subtotal colectomy in patients with a diverted rectum (hazard ratio, 3.67). CONCLUSIONS In an analysis of the Swedish National Patient Register, we found that the risk for rectal cancer after colectomy in patients with UC is low, in relative and absolute terms, after reconstruction with an IPAA. An IRA and diverted rectum are associated with an increased risk of rectal cancer, compared with the general population, but the absolute risk is low. Patients and their health care providers should consider these findings in making decisions to leave the rectum intact, perform completion proctectomy, or reconstruct the colon with an IRA or IPAA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maie Abdalla
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
| | | | - Peter Andersson
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Roland E Andersson
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Pär Myrelid
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Magro F, Gionchetti P, Eliakim R, Ardizzone S, Armuzzi A, Barreiro-de Acosta M, Burisch J, Gecse KB, Hart AL, Hindryckx P, Langner C, Limdi JK, Pellino G, Zagórowicz E, Raine T, Harbord M, Rieder F. Third European Evidence-based Consensus on Diagnosis and Management of Ulcerative Colitis. Part 1: Definitions, Diagnosis, Extra-intestinal Manifestations, Pregnancy, Cancer Surveillance, Surgery, and Ileo-anal Pouch Disorders. J Crohns Colitis 2017; 11:649-670. [PMID: 28158501 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1242] [Impact Index Per Article: 155.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2016] [Accepted: 02/01/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Magro
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Porto; MedInUP, Centre for Drug Discovery and Innovative Medicines; Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Rami Eliakim
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Sandro Ardizzone
- Gastrointestinal Unit ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco-University of Milan-Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Armuzzi
- IBD Unit Complesso Integrato Columbus, Gastroenterological and Endocrino-Metabolical Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta
- Department of Gastroenterology, IBD Unit, University Hospital Santiago De Compostela (CHUS), A Coruña, Spain
| | - Johan Burisch
- Department of Gastroenterology, North Zealand University Hospital, Frederikssund, Denmark
| | - Krisztina B Gecse
- First Department of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest,Hungary
| | | | - Pieter Hindryckx
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Cord Langner
- Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jimmy K Limdi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust; Institute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Unit of General Surgery, Second University of Naples,Napoli, Italy
| | - Edyta Zagórowicz
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Department of Oncological Gastroenterology Warsaw; Medical Centre for Postgraduate Education, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Tim Raine
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge,UK
| | - Marcus Harbord
- Imperial College London; Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London,UK
| | - Florian Rieder
- Department of Pathobiology /NC22, Lerner Research Institute; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition/A3, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Landerholm K, Abdalla M, Myrelid P, Andersson RE. Survival of ileal pouch anal anastomosis constructed after colectomy or secondary to a previous ileorectal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis patients: a population-based cohort study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2017; 52:531-535. [PMID: 28102092 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1278457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) affects bowel function, sexual function and reproduction less negatively than ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA), the standard reconstruction after colectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC). In younger UC patients, IRA may have a role postponing pelvic surgery and IPAA. The aim of the present study was to investigate the survival of IPAA secondary to IRA compared to IPAA as primary reconstruction, as this has not previously been studied in UC. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients with UC diagnosis between 1960 and 2010 in Sweden were identified from the National Patient Registry. From this cohort, colectomized patients reconstructed with primary IPAA and patients reconstructed with IPAA secondary to IRA were identified. The survival of the IPAA was followed up until pouch failure, defined as pouchectomy and ileostomy or a diverting ileostomy alone. RESULTS Out of 63,796 patients, 1796 were reconstructed with IPAA, either primarily (n = 1720) or secondary to a previous IRA (n = 76). There were no demographic differences between the groups, including length of follow-up (median 12.6 (IQR 6.7-16.6) years and 10.0 (IQR 3.5-15.9) years, respectively). Failure of the IPAA occurred in 103 (6.0%) patients with primary and in 6 (8%) patients after secondary IPAA (P = 0.38 log-rank). The 10-year pouch survival was 94% (95% CI 93-96) for primary IPAA and 92% (81-97) for secondary. CONCLUSIONS Patients choosing IRA as primary reconstruction do not have an increased risk of failure of a later secondary IPAA in comparison with patients with primary IPAA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalle Landerholm
- a Department of Surgery , Ryhov County Hospital , Jönköping , Sweden.,b Department of Surgery, Colorectal unit , Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Oxford , UK
| | - Maie Abdalla
- c Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine , Linköping University , Linköping , Sweden.,d Faculty of Medicine , Suez Canal University , Ismailia , Egypt
| | - Pär Myrelid
- c Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine , Linköping University , Linköping , Sweden.,e Department of Surgery , County Council of Östergötland , Linköping , Sweden
| | - Roland E Andersson
- a Department of Surgery , Ryhov County Hospital , Jönköping , Sweden.,c Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine , Linköping University , Linköping , Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chittleborough TJ, Warrier SK, Heriot AG, Kalady M, Church J. Dispelling misconceptions in the management of familial adenomatous polyposis. ANZ J Surg 2017; 87:441-445. [PMID: 28266097 DOI: 10.1111/ans.13919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2016] [Revised: 12/18/2016] [Accepted: 12/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis require surgical intervention at some point in their lives. The diagnosis is often apparent from their phenotype and family history, however, this is not always the case. Many factors can influence the surgical strategy although the polyposis burden and distribution remain the main consideration. While prophylactic removal of the rectum and colon is often required, sparing the rectum at the index surgery is safe in select patients. This article aims to dispel misconceptions in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J Chittleborough
- Department of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Satish K Warrier
- Department of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alexander G Heriot
- Department of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew Kalady
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Sanford R. Weiss, MD Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - James Church
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Sanford R. Weiss, MD Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Aziz O, Albeyati A, Derias M, Varsani N, Ashrafian H, Athanasiou T, Clark SK, Jenkins JT, Kennedy RH. Anastomotic leaks can be detected within 5 days following ileorectal anastomosis: a case-controlled study in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Colorectal Dis 2017; 19:251-259. [PMID: 27444690 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2015] [Accepted: 06/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
AIM To determine the earliest time point at which anastomotic leaks can be detected in patients undergoing total colectomy with primary ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis. METHOD This was a case-controlled study of 10 anastomotic leak patients vs 20 controls following laparoscopic total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis (from 96 consecutive patients between 2006 and 2013). Panel time-series data regression was performed using a double subscript structure to include both variables. A generalized least squares multivariate approach was applied in a random effects setting to calculate correlations for observations, with anastomotic leak being the dependent variable. Univariate and multivariate regression calculations were then performed according to individual observations at each recorded time point. Time-series analysis was used to determine when a variable became significant in the leak group. RESULTS Multivariate analysis identified a significant difference between leak and control groups in mean heart rate (P < 0.001), mean respiratory rate (P = 0.017) and mean urine output (P = 0.001). Time-point analysis showed that heart rate was significantly different between leak and control groups at postoperative day 4.25. Multivariate analysis identified a significant difference between groups in alanine transaminase (P = 0.006), bilirubin (P = 0.008), creatinine (P = 0.001), haemoglobin (P < 0.001) and urea (P = 0.007). There were no differences between groups with regard to markers of inflammation such as albumin, white blood cell count, neutrophil count and C-reactive protein. CONCLUSION Anastomotic leaks can be detected early (within 4.5 days of surgery) through changes in physiological, blood test and observational parameters, providing an opportunity for early intervention in these patients to salvage the anastomosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Aziz
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK.,The Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A Albeyati
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - M Derias
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - N Varsani
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - H Ashrafian
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - T Athanasiou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - S K Clark
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - J T Jenkins
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - R H Kennedy
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|