BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in CrossRef
For: Pang YF, Shu L, Xia CW. Retrospective comparative study of different surgical methods for gastric ulcer perforation: Efficacy and postoperative complications. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(2): 101896 [PMID: 40062002 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.101896]
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i2/101896.htm
Number Citing Articles
1
Kai-Yue Guan, Qing-Zhen Wu, Bo Ning, En-Qiang Ling-Hu. Exploration of a new method of a biopatch based on the central concept of the multi-layer repairWorld Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2025; 17(12): 113490 doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.113490
2
Saurabh Chauhan, Anil Kushwanshi, Sangeeta Rajput, Babita Chauhan. Retrospective Study on Various Surgical Approaches for Gastric Ulcer Perforation. A Comparative StudyJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences 2025; 17(Suppl 4): S3301 doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1352_25
3
Adem Tuncer, Cuneyt Kayaalp. Balancing emergency repair and oncological safety in gastric ulcer perforationsWorld Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2025; 17(10): 110382 doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i10.110382