For: | Ji WB, Kwak JM, Kim J, Um JW, Kim SH. Risk factors causing structural sequelae after anastomotic leakage in mid to low rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(19): 5910-5917 [PMID: 26019455 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5910] |
---|---|
URL: | https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i19/5910.htm |
Number | Citing Articles |
1 |
Ri Na Yoo, Gun Kim, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Hyeon-Min Cho, HyungJin Kim. The fate of preserved sphincter in rectal cancer patients. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2018; 33(6): 745 doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3001-2
|
2 |
M. Shalaby, S. Emile, H. Elfeki, A. Sakr, S. D. Wexner, P. Sileri. Systematic review of endoluminal vacuum‐assisted therapy as salvage treatment for rectal anastomotic leakage. BJS Open 2019; 3(2): 153 doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50124
|
3 |
Pasquale Scognamiglio, Anja Seeger, Matthias Reeh, Nathaniel Melling, Karl F Karstens, Thomas Rösch, Jakob R Izbicki, Marcus Kantowski, Michael Tachezy. Challenges in the interdisciplinary treatment of leakages after left-sided colorectal surgery: endoscopic negative pressure therapy, open-pore film drainage therapy and beyond. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2023; 38(1) doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04418-5
|
4 |
Wenlong Qiu, Junguang Liu, Kunshan He, Gang Hu, Shiwen Mei, Xu Guan, Xishan Wang, Jie Tian, Jianqiang Tang. Blood perfusion assessment by near-infrared fluorescence angiography of epiploic appendages in prevention of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer: a case-matched study. Surgical Endoscopy 2024; 38(9): 5446 doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11085-2
|
5 |
H. Hasegawa, Y. Tsukada, M. Wakabayashi, S. Nomura, T. Sasaki, Y. Nishizawa, K. Ikeda, N. Takeshita, K. Teramura, M. Ito. Impact of near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green on structural sequelae of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection of malignant rectal tumors. Techniques in Coloproctology 2022; 26(7): 561 doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02631-y
|
6 |
Yun Hee Kang, Geon Park. Characteristics of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in anastomotic sinus and fistula following rectal cancer surgery. Clinical Imaging 2017; 41: 33 doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.08.019
|
7 |
Mahtab Zangui, Abbas Abdollahi, Mehdi Jabbari Nooghabi, Ali Jangjoo, Reza Roshan Ravan, Yasaman Navari, Fateme Shahabi. Laparoscopic Proctectomy in Locally Advance Rectal Cancer: Prolapse Delayed Anastomosis Compared to Immediate Anastomosis. Indian Journal of Surgery 2022; 84(5): 1014 doi: 10.1007/s12262-021-03191-5
|
8 |
Bobo Zheng, Quan Wang, Mingtian Wei, Yumin Yue, Xiaojun Li. Which site is better for prophylactic ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery? By the specimen extraction site or new site: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Oncology 2023; 13 doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1116502
|
9 |
Florian Kühn, Ulrich Wirth, Julia Zimmermann, Nicola Beger, Sandro M. Hasenhütl, Moritz Drefs, Christian Heiliger, Maria Burian, Jens Werner, Tobias S. Schiergens. Endoscopic vacuum therapy for in- and outpatient treatment of colorectal defects. Surgical Endoscopy 2021; 35(12): 6687 doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08172-5
|
10 |
Gang Tang, Donglin Du, Jie Tao, Zhengqiang Wei. Effect of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography on Anastomotic Leakage in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Propensity-Score-Matched Studies. Frontiers in Surgery 2022; 9 doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.815753
|
11 |
Elisa Bertocchi, Giuliano Barugola, Marco Benini, Paolo Bocus, Roberto Rossini, Marcello Ceccaroni, Giacomo Ruffo. Colorectal Anastomotic Stenosis: Lessons Learned after 1643 Colorectal Resections for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2019; 26(1): 100 doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.03.033
|
12 |
Peng Wang, Jian-Wei Liang, Hai-Tao Zhou, Zheng Wang, Zhi-Xiang Zhou. Surgical specimen extraction <i>via</i> a prophylactic ileostomy procedure: A minimally invasive technique for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2018; 24(1): 104-111 doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.104
|